FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

PC Keith Blakelock

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

On the news it says they have just arrested a 44 year old man for his murder in the Broadwater Farm riots of 1985.

I never realised there was an ongoing investigation! It surprises me its taken this long for them to make an arrest, especially after the last guy they arrested, jailed and had to release

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atisfy janeWoman
over a year ago

Torquay

I'd be very interested in hearing how they are able, or are hoping, to prove this after 28 years have passed.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow

Murder cases are never closed till there's a conviction. More so for the murder of a Police Officer.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"I'd be very interested in hearing how they are able, or are hoping, to prove this after 28 years have passed.

"

Exactly what I thought when I heard the news

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I thought they had already banged up someone for it a long while ago? I'm sure similar diligence would be applied if it was a member of public

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Murder cases are never closed till there's a conviction. More so for the murder of a Police Officer."

Maybe never closed, but do they all have ongoing investigations?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atisfy janeWoman
over a year ago

Torquay


"I thought they had already banged up someone for it a long while ago? I'm sure similar diligence would be applied if it was a member of public "

Winston Silcott....who wasn't even on the Broadwater Farm estate on the night of the horrific killing of PC Blakelock.

I hope they get it right this time, without false witnesses that they used the first time around.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

So does that places the suspect in his mid-teens at the time of the murder..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow


"I'd be very interested in hearing how they are able, or are hoping, to prove this after 28 years have passed.

Exactly what I thought when I heard the news"

Maybe the same way they secured convictions against Stuart Hall.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"So does that places the suspect in his mid-teens at the time of the murder.. "

16, according to the BBC

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-23425600

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *isscheekychopsWoman
over a year ago

The land of grey peas and bacon

There are special departments in the police that solely deal with cold cases

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"I'd be very interested in hearing how they are able, or are hoping, to prove this after 28 years have passed.

Exactly what I thought when I heard the news

Maybe the same way they secured convictions against Stuart Hall."

Wasnt that the victims coming forward? Sadly, PC Blakelock cannot do that?!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Shame they didn't get it right first time. This is my one and only argument against death penalty. Mistakes!!!!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *allDarkFoxForYouMan
over a year ago

Winchester/London


"There are special departments in the police that solely deal with cold cases "

Yup it's called " new tricks " innit

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow


"I'd be very interested in hearing how they are able, or are hoping, to prove this after 28 years have passed.

Exactly what I thought when I heard the news

Maybe the same way they secured convictions against Stuart Hall.

Wasnt that the victims coming forward? Sadly, PC Blakelock cannot do that?!"

No, but perhaps there's new evidence.

After all it wasn't that Hall was convicted after a trial before a jury - he confessed, presumably because he knew his chances of being acquitted were slim.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top