Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Oh no we'll all have to fess up to liking sex , how embarrassing. Are you worried if you have to opt in OP ? I'm not. " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Maybe they should apply similar efforts to block shite from PPI companies, fake Viagra companies, personal injury companies, people trying to sell me fucking phone contracts, people trying to sell shit I already own, Nigerian scam artists and annoying bloody god bothering wank stains trying to save my soul- now that would be a more popular use of time and energy " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Maybe they should apply similar efforts to block shite from PPI companies, fake Viagra companies, personal injury companies, people trying to sell me fucking phone contracts, people trying to sell shit I already own, Nigerian scam artists and annoying bloody god bothering wank stains trying to save my soul- now that would be a more popular use of time and energy " Some kinds of porn do need blocking but I agree that the above "Internet shite" should be blocked too | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I cant wait to ask my boss to ring the internet provider up to opt out of adult blocking. Should be interesting" (y) | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Maybe they should apply similar efforts to block shite from PPI companies, fake Viagra companies, personal injury companies, people trying to sell me fucking phone contracts, people trying to sell shit I already own, Nigerian scam artists and annoying bloody god bothering wank stains trying to save my soul- now that would be a more popular use of time and energy Some kinds of porn do need blocking but I agree that the above "Internet shite" should be blocked too " Do they need blocking or is it a good way to track those interested in more dangerous pursuits? This sounds very similar to the ott reaction after Dunblane when the government pretty much wiped out target shooting clubs who were operating perfectly safely, to help cut gun crime- well that worked out well didn't it? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think its a great move. I also understand looking at the worst type of porno will be made illegal!" It's illegal at the moment. Making things illegal is easy. Actually stopping people doing illegal things is the tricky bit. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think its a great move. I also understand looking at the worst type of porno will be made illegal! It's illegal at the moment. Making things illegal is easy. Actually stopping people doing illegal things is the tricky bit." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"another pile of crap populism from the Coalition that has cut funding to many of the Agencies who catch the user's of that vile type of media.. pity he didn't have the same sized bollocks when sorting out big alcohol and big tobacco.. " The problem's the same. Lynton Crosby. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"another pile of crap populism from the Coalition that has cut funding to many of the Agencies who catch the user's of that vile type of media.. pity he didn't have the same sized bollocks when sorting out big alcohol and big tobacco.. The problem's the same. Lynton Crosby." That will be the same none advising advisor who also owns a company advising err big tobacco, but didn't give any advice at all ever on the plain packaging.. suppose in the number 10 household they get freebies.. does have a knack of choosing some interesting 'advisors'.. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Firstly this will take time to implement and all the ISP's will have to agree on the blocking filters. Secondly it is virtually impossible to both police this and track it, the cost are completely unjustifiable. Thirdly as i already said in another post it is so easy to circumvent making it totally pointless. Totally agree that child porn etc should be blocked or removed but reality it is a pointless task because someone somewhere will find a way. If you think all this is scary just be thankful you dont know about the deep web !! Now that really is scary !! " Child porn is illegal! it has been illegal for many years! No ISP as far as I know has knowingly let people view or make child porn. Search engines like Google have always removed links to sites that show child porn as soon as they are pointed out! I am not sure what the hell the PM is getting at? People use the internet as a communication tool, people create sites and content. Sometimes these sites or content in them are illegal. Why is it the ISP's fault if people do this? It is the people that are creating them or viewing them that are breaking the law. It is like telling Royal mail that they need to open every letter and parcel to check the contents. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Call Me Dave is gonna tell us what he's gonna do on Jeremy Whine on Radio 2 shortly" He tried telling Woman's Hour back at 10.00 this morning but fared no better than he did when gralloched by an under par Andrew Marr yesterday. Watch out for how Cameron tries to dodge the reduction in real terms funding for CEOPs. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think its a great move. I also understand looking at the worst type of porno will be made illegal! It's illegal at the moment. Making things illegal is easy. Actually stopping people doing illegal things is the tricky bit." I agree, but I think we need more personal responsibility. It is not for the government to block everything we do just in case. We need better define laws and better define punishments. And when someone breaks a law they need to be punished. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I am not sure what the hell the PM is getting at? " May 2015.. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think its a great move. I also understand looking at the worst type of porno will be made illegal! It's illegal at the moment. Making things illegal is easy. Actually stopping people doing illegal things is the tricky bit. I agree, but I think we need more personal responsibility. It is not for the government to block everything we do just in case. We need better define laws and better define punishments. And when someone breaks a law they need to be punished. " It can't be done. If the banks with all their IT wizzardry and money can't stop phishing etc and the big multinationals with similar resources can't stop others hacking their systems, if terrorists can continue to use cyberspace to hide and plot, despite the best endeavours of GCHQ and the Pentagon, what chance do we have with a few quid and a plan hastily written on the back of a fag packet (in the spaces between the print). | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I am not sure what the hell the PM is getting at? May 2015.." So to win the election the PM is giving us what we think we want, they really we have no idea what we want? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I am not sure what the hell the PM is getting at? May 2015.." Trying to get Lynton Crosby out of the headlines. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Aslong as your not a massive asexual tory werido all you have to do is say yes to your internet provider and then you get your porn back. I think thats pretty much the top and bottom of it. Such a good government strategy, I think not." Phrasing! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think its a great move. I also understand looking at the worst type of porno will be made illegal! It's illegal at the moment. Making things illegal is easy. Actually stopping people doing illegal things is the tricky bit. I agree, but I think we need more personal responsibility. It is not for the government to block everything we do just in case. We need better define laws and better define punishments. And when someone breaks a law they need to be punished. It can't be done. If the banks with all their IT wizzardry and money can't stop phishing etc and the big multinationals with similar resources can't stop others hacking their systems, if terrorists can continue to use cyberspace to hide and plot, despite the best endeavours of GCHQ and the Pentagon, what chance do we have with a few quid and a plan hastily written on the back of a fag packet (in the spaces between the print)." We have good laws already! We just need to be able to enforce them. At the moment it seems like we are not able to. How often have you heard of a case of someone committing a crime, but it seems to go on for ages and ages. People are not being punished! and people see that people are not being punished so just carry on committing crimes. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I am not sure what the hell the PM is getting at? May 2015.. So to win the election the PM is giving us what we think we want, they really we have no idea what we want?" has any Government known what we want, or actually given a toss once in office that they renege on much of what the promise.. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I am not sure what the hell the PM is getting at? May 2015.. So to win the election the PM is giving us what we think we want, they really we have no idea what we want? has any Government known what we want, or actually given a toss once in office that they renege on much of what the promise.. " + | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I am not sure what the hell the PM is getting at? May 2015.. So to win the election the PM is giving us what we think we want, they really we have no idea what we want? has any Government known what we want, or actually given a toss once in office that they renege on much of what the promise.. " ofcourse they haven't | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I notice most people have missed the bit where search engines will be made to report people who search for certain terms. You know, like the way the Chinese arrest people for searching for "Tainamen Square". I wonder what words might bring the bully boys around ? "Lynton Crosby" perhaps ? "Tory party Jimmy Savile" perchance ?" Schh.. for some on here mentioning the Tory party in anything but glowing sycophantic terms will have you sent off to your own forum.. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Maybe they should apply similar efforts to block shite from PPI companies, fake Viagra companies, personal injury companies, people trying to sell me fucking phone contracts, people trying to sell shit I already own, Nigerian scam artists and annoying bloody god bothering wank stains trying to save my soul- now that would be a more popular use of time and energy " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I bet that ISP's will have to keep a record of everyone that has asked for the blokes to be removed. " The females will get removed too unless it's Gay Porn of course | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23401076 Just wondered how they will decide what sites are blocked would sites like fab be blocked. Will it work the same way as mobile phones? " What about the people that will have to go though every site on the internet and give it a rating? Actually they will have to go though every page on every internet site. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well Fab will be in the block as the site is adult content and the network filtering of the mobile operators may operate in how you turn on/off differently to your home broadband but yes similar issues with over and under blocking." Internet porn filters are like using big square holes to filter out flour. It will only work if the bits you are filtering out are big and not square shaped. Filters can only block what they are told to block. Unless a site is marked some how as porn then how can it be blocked? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So, we're all just going to bellyache about this and say "nanny state" surely someone can see the bigger picture here? If they can glide through a bill to block or track porn sites, then maybe a bill to block or track everything else they deem necessary. How about political opponent points of view? Bad news stories about them? How about being fed what someone else wants to feed you, rather than free choice? Where there's a will there's a way, the paedo sicko's will find another way, but the rest of us have to ask permission to view what we want to see. Why not monitor the paedo's properly, get them some physiological help and chemical castration at the same time! Take away their desires and give them a way to rewire their sickness. " I think the problem is that some people believe that anyone who accesses porn are peados and rapist. They believe all people that are viewing such material needs to be monitored. Then again these are the same people that think if you do not go to a COE church every Sunday you are some sort of terrorist. (I guessing I have just put myself on some sort of watch list now, I have mentioned the words Peado, porn and terrorist on the same post) | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"For sake of argument if you were to google how do i find pedo in my area to see if neighbour has been convicted of an offence could the fact you type pedo in the search make you a suspicious person by authorities. In principal its great idea but policing in correct and fair way will be difficult." As you have mention the word Pedo on a swinging site you are now on a GCHQ and NSA watch list | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" ... How often have you heard of a case of someone committing a crime, but it seems to go on for ages and ages. People are not being punished! ... " Exactly, if the 2 twats who clearly murdered lee rigby are being held as murder SUSPECTS. The justice system in this country is already flawed. Imagine how hard it will be for the authorities to convict an IP address ! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" If they can glide through a bill to block or track porn sites, then maybe a bill to block or track everything else they deem necessary. How about political opponent points of view? Bad news stories about them? How about being fed what someone else wants to feed you, rather than free choice? " Give that man a cigar! They tried dancing with the devil and Murdoch and co. shat on their shoes so now they are going to jump on the bandwagon with cries of "we must protect the little ones" to basically repeal a right to a free media. If kiddie or violent porn, which is already illegal, is available on the public internet then let him gather a group of selected independent journalists, free speech campaigners and a couple of high court judges and demonstrate it at a randomly chosen location, so no freaked searches etc. He will not be able to. Google, all major UK ISP's, the Internet Watch Foundation, CEOPS, Microsoft etc etc all work quietly and effectively to remove it. This shit is traded person to person via encrypted files on filesharing sites. The police know this but are letting him run because it will get them more money and power to abuse. Cameron is "threatening" Google, f**k that made me laugh. Maybe the guys in Mountain View should teach him a lesson as to where the real power on the net lies and just remove any mention of him for a few days. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" If they can glide through a bill to block or track porn sites, then maybe a bill to block or track everything else they deem necessary. How about political opponent points of view? Bad news stories about them? How about being fed what someone else wants to feed you, rather than free choice? Give that man a cigar! They tried dancing with the devil and Murdoch and co. shat on their shoes so now they are going to jump on the bandwagon with cries of "we must protect the little ones" to basically repeal a right to a free media. If kiddie or violent porn, which is already illegal, is available on the public internet then let him gather a group of selected independent journalists, free speech campaigners and a couple of high court judges and demonstrate it at a randomly chosen location, so no freaked searches etc. He will not be able to. Google, all major UK ISP's, the Internet Watch Foundation, CEOPS, Microsoft etc etc all work quietly and effectively to remove it. This shit is traded person to person via encrypted files on filesharing sites. The police know this but are letting him run because it will get them more money and power to abuse. Cameron is "threatening" Google, f**k that made me laugh. Maybe the guys in Mountain View should teach him a lesson as to where the real power on the net lies and just remove any mention of him for a few days. " Yep, the PM is saying that ISPs should be blocking sites that contain illegal material. One simple question for the PM. How would an ISP know a site contains illegal material? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" If they can glide through a bill to block or track porn sites, then maybe a bill to block or track everything else they deem necessary. How about political opponent points of view? Bad news stories about them? How about being fed what someone else wants to feed you, rather than free choice? Give that man a cigar! They tried dancing with the devil and Murdoch and co. shat on their shoes so now they are going to jump on the bandwagon with cries of "we must protect the little ones" to basically repeal a right to a free media. If kiddie or violent porn, which is already illegal, is available on the public internet then let him gather a group of selected independent journalists, free speech campaigners and a couple of high court judges and demonstrate it at a randomly chosen location, so no freaked searches etc. He will not be able to. Google, all major UK ISP's, the Internet Watch Foundation, CEOPS, Microsoft etc etc all work quietly and effectively to remove it. This shit is traded person to person via encrypted files on filesharing sites. The police know this but are letting him run because it will get them more money and power to abuse. Cameron is "threatening" Google, f**k that made me laugh. Maybe the guys in Mountain View should teach him a lesson as to where the real power on the net lies and just remove any mention of him for a few days. Yep, the PM is saying that ISPs should be blocking sites that contain illegal material. One simple question for the PM. How would an ISP know a site contains illegal material?" They cant thats the whole point, it would be virtually impossible to keep an up to date catalogue of every site UK based let alone on the world wide web. UK government were told before if they wanted to track the UK's net activity for one day they would need an aircraft hanger full to the brim with servers and thats just for ONE DAY's worth of surfing !! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" If they can glide through a bill to block or track porn sites, then maybe a bill to block or track everything else they deem necessary. How about political opponent points of view? Bad news stories about them? How about being fed what someone else wants to feed you, rather than free choice? Give that man a cigar! They tried dancing with the devil and Murdoch and co. shat on their shoes so now they are going to jump on the bandwagon with cries of "we must protect the little ones" to basically repeal a right to a free media. If kiddie or violent porn, which is already illegal, is available on the public internet then let him gather a group of selected independent journalists, free speech campaigners and a couple of high court judges and demonstrate it at a randomly chosen location, so no freaked searches etc. He will not be able to. Google, all major UK ISP's, the Internet Watch Foundation, CEOPS, Microsoft etc etc all work quietly and effectively to remove it. This shit is traded person to person via encrypted files on filesharing sites. The police know this but are letting him run because it will get them more money and power to abuse. Cameron is "threatening" Google, f**k that made me laugh. Maybe the guys in Mountain View should teach him a lesson as to where the real power on the net lies and just remove any mention of him for a few days. Yep, the PM is saying that ISPs should be blocking sites that contain illegal material. One simple question for the PM. How would an ISP know a site contains illegal material? They cant thats the whole point, it would be virtually impossible to keep an up to date catalogue of every site UK based let alone on the world wide web. UK government were told before if they wanted to track the UK's net activity for one day they would need an aircraft hanger full to the brim with servers and thats just for ONE DAY's worth of surfing !! " Instead of put controls on what people can watch, listen to, read, eat and drink. Maybe the government should be finding way of punishing people that have committed real crimes ! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" If they can glide through a bill to block or track porn sites, then maybe a bill to block or track everything else they deem necessary. How about political opponent points of view? Bad news stories about them? How about being fed what someone else wants to feed you, rather than free choice? Give that man a cigar! They tried dancing with the devil and Murdoch and co. shat on their shoes so now they are going to jump on the bandwagon with cries of "we must protect the little ones" to basically repeal a right to a free media. If kiddie or violent porn, which is already illegal, is available on the public internet then let him gather a group of selected independent journalists, free speech campaigners and a couple of high court judges and demonstrate it at a randomly chosen location, so no freaked searches etc. He will not be able to. Google, all major UK ISP's, the Internet Watch Foundation, CEOPS, Microsoft etc etc all work quietly and effectively to remove it. This shit is traded person to person via encrypted files on filesharing sites. The police know this but are letting him run because it will get them more money and power to abuse. Cameron is "threatening" Google, f**k that made me laugh. Maybe the guys in Mountain View should teach him a lesson as to where the real power on the net lies and just remove any mention of him for a few days. Yep, the PM is saying that ISPs should be blocking sites that contain illegal material. One simple question for the PM. How would an ISP know a site contains illegal material? They cant thats the whole point, it would be virtually impossible to keep an up to date catalogue of every site UK based let alone on the world wide web. UK government were told before if they wanted to track the UK's net activity for one day they would need an aircraft hanger full to the brim with servers and thats just for ONE DAY's worth of surfing !! Instead of put controls on what people can watch, listen to, read, eat and drink. Maybe the government should be finding way of punishing people that have committed real crimes !" Absolutely we would also like to know how they are gonna police the already convicted sex offenders that are on the register ?? Maybe they should have their internet removed completely or software installed to stop them looking ?? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"it seems all very 1984 to me, is watching porn bad- no. is it wrong to let pedos watch porn bad- no. is letting pedos watch child porn bad- yes. is letting children watch porn bad- not really, i remember watching porn and reading porn mags as a kid, if its out there kids will find a way. is having porn beeing thrust on kids bad- yes. but im not sure this is happening. would an opt in system stop pedos watching child porn-no. seems like a vote grabbing move from a struggling goverment." How many parents would have the blocks kept on? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If you want to watch rape why not go to prison and wait your turn anything that protects children from perverts is worth it and if you have to ask your isp to allow porn whats the hardship " I would agree, except this measure protects nobody from anything. It's smoke and mirrors that achieves nothing and costs lots but not directly through the government so they don't have to mention that. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If you want to watch rape why not go to prison and wait your turn anything that protects children from perverts is worth it and if you have to ask your isp to allow porn whats the hardship I would agree, except this measure protects nobody from anything. It's smoke and mirrors that achieves nothing and costs lots but not directly through the government so they don't have to mention that." More red tape, more mid managers getting money for doing not a lot. I am a true conservative and I can say that this is not a conservative policy. Conservatives so not believe in restricting people! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If you want to watch rape why not go to prison and wait your turn anything that protects children from perverts is worth it and if you have to ask your isp to allow porn whats the hardship I would agree, except this measure protects nobody from anything. It's smoke and mirrors that achieves nothing and costs lots but not directly through the government so they don't have to mention that." If the PM was worried about this sort thing why has he cut funding to "Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre". Surely if he was really worried about this sort of stuff he would be increasing funding ! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If you want to watch rape why not go to prison and wait your turn anything that protects children from perverts is worth it and if you have to ask your isp to allow porn whats the hardship I would agree, except this measure protects nobody from anything. It's smoke and mirrors that achieves nothing and costs lots but not directly through the government so they don't have to mention that. More red tape, more mid managers getting money for doing not a lot. I am a true conservative and I can say that this is not a conservative policy. Conservatives so not believe in restricting people!" er, which conservative government in the past 50 years has come close to "not restricting people". | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"And as re only porn I'd ever view would not breach any current legislation - if I have to do the same with my ISP - I'll happily make another 2 minute phone call!" As will every 12 year old boy... But the government can pretend they did something. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think this site will be affected if it happens as in work. They have done this as some people have been caught watching porn in work. Anyway since then. I can't get on fab on my phone in work. When I try the address changes several times Worthing a few seconds, by itself and one of the addresses says "block" and a budge of characters, etc. Then the wifi homepage of my workplace comes up. So I think this kind of action will affect all fab users and I think the runner of the website should contact whoever to sort it out." Why on earth would you access a sex site on your works internet??? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"And as re only porn I'd ever view would not breach any current legislation - if I have to do the same with my ISP - I'll happily make another 2 minute phone call! As will every 12 year old boy... But the government can pretend they did something." 12 yr old boys won't have passed the credit check for the contract though will they! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think this site will be affected if it happens as in work. They have done this as some people have been caught watching porn in work. Anyway since then. I can't get on fab on my phone in work. When I try the address changes several times Worthing a few seconds, by itself and one of the addresses says "block" and a budge of characters, etc. Then the wifi homepage of my workplace comes up. So I think this kind of action will affect all fab users and I think the runner of the website should contact whoever to sort it out. Why on earth would you access a sex site on your works internet??? " And even if you did/could - if access was revoked by your company - how is that the site owners responsibility?? Wise up! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One i think will be funny are the people that rent a property or room in a house and the internet is supplied by the landlord, can see a few red faces when asking the landlord to remove the porn filter !! " That's me and my landlord is my dad lol | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One i think will be funny are the people that rent a property or room in a house and the internet is supplied by the landlord, can see a few red faces when asking the landlord to remove the porn filter !! That's me and my landlord is my dad lol " Ha ha ha lmao pmsl !!! " Dad dad remove the filter i wanna get on Fab " lmao !!!! Sorry lol that really tickled me | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think this site will be affected if it happens as in work. They have done this as some people have been caught watching porn in work. Anyway since then. I can't get on fab on my phone in work. When I try the address changes several times Worthing a few seconds, by itself and one of the addresses says "block" and a budge of characters, etc. Then the wifi homepage of my workplace comes up. So I think this kind of action will affect all fab users and I think the runner of the website should contact whoever to sort it out. Why on earth would you access a sex site on your works internet??? And even if you did/could - if access was revoked by your company - how is that the site owners responsibility?? Wise up! " Someone got caught using the staffs computer to watch/download porn . Since then though I can't access fab on my phone. I reply to my messages for this site. Not exactly porn is it | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think this site will be affected if it happens as in work. They have done this as some people have been caught watching porn in work. Anyway since then. I can't get on fab on my phone in work. When I try the address changes several times Worthing a few seconds, by itself and one of the addresses says "block" and a budge of characters, etc. Then the wifi homepage of my workplace comes up. So I think this kind of action will affect all fab users and I think the runner of the website should contact whoever to sort it out. Why on earth would you access a sex site on your works internet??? And even if you did/could - if access was revoked by your company - how is that the site owners responsibility?? Wise up! Someone got caught using the staffs computer to watch/download porn . Since then though I can't access fab on my phone. I reply to my messages for this site. Not exactly porn is it " No, a site where you message people for sex and can see pictures of cocks and gaping cum filled pussies isn't porn, silly me | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think this site will be affected if it happens as in work. They have done this as some people have been caught watching porn in work. Anyway since then. I can't get on fab on my phone in work. When I try the address changes several times Worthing a few seconds, by itself and one of the addresses says "block" and a budge of characters, etc. Then the wifi homepage of my workplace comes up. So I think this kind of action will affect all fab users and I think the runner of the website should contact whoever to sort it out. Why on earth would you access a sex site on your works internet??? And even if you did/could - if access was revoked by your company - how is that the site owners responsibility?? Wise up! Someone got caught using the staffs computer to watch/download porn . Since then though I can't access fab on my phone. I reply to my messages for this site. Not exactly porn is it No, a site where you message people for sex and can see pictures of cocks and gaping cum filled pussies isn't porn, silly me " Well if you wanted to wank over something. You wouldn't come on here would you? Unless you were going to have a last minute meet with a member. Which a lot of people don't do. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think this site will be affected if it happens as in work. They have done this as some people have been caught watching porn in work. Anyway since then. I can't get on fab on my phone in work. When I try the address changes several times Worthing a few seconds, by itself and one of the addresses says "block" and a budge of characters, etc. Then the wifi homepage of my workplace comes up. So I think this kind of action will affect all fab users and I think the runner of the website should contact whoever to sort it out. Why on earth would you access a sex site on your works internet??? And even if you did/could - if access was revoked by your company - how is that the site owners responsibility?? Wise up! Someone got caught using the staffs computer to watch/download porn . Since then though I can't access fab on my phone. I reply to my messages for this site. Not exactly porn is it No, a site where you message people for sex and can see pictures of cocks and gaping cum filled pussies isn't porn, silly me Well if you wanted to wank over something. You wouldn't come on here would you? Unless you were going to have a last minute meet with a member. Which a lot of people don't do. " So all those people on cam pulling their lodger aren't wanking then?? Wonder what they are doing lol Just because you don't use it to wank doesn't mean it's not a porn site. It has adult content not meant for underage eyes. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is all just another money making, controlling the public, spin doctor load of election crap !!! So heres my say to Mr C. " Dear Dave, After listening to you interview this afternoon with Jeremy Vine regarding the filters you intend to deploy on all pornography on the internet in the UK I have only this to say to you..... Get a grip you egotistical idiot, instead of wasting hundreds of thousands of tax payers and companies money on a pointless waste of time concentrate on getting the country back to where it should be and leave us to wank, shag and oggle as much porn as we want to. Just cos you have 4 kids and probably dont get any anymore dont punish the British public !! Instead concentrate on the scam emails, prolific paedophiles and thieving bank managers let alone the rest of the scumbags getting away with murder etc that you seem to think are ok to roam are streets !!!! To the people of the UK i say wank away, watch as much porn as your eyes and bits can handle !! Spank your monkey till your blind, rub one out till you cant see for your eyesight will soon be unable to savour the delights of porn no more !! Here endeth my rant and as for you Dave grow a pair and do something useful for once " Guess you'll be opting IN then.... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Cracking idea....!!!! If I want it I can ask for it.... Some free Wi fi hotspots already censor.... Try logging on to Fabs in Maccy Ds..... " Go to KFC you can there | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think it is dangerous - I have work colleagues who's wives wouldn't let them opt for the block to be lifted. There is likely to be a significant rise is sexual assault and rape if you tamper with this sort of thing. This needs more thought. " you are seriously suggesting that cos some guys may have their internet access limited or curtailed.. that some of them will turn into rapists and start sexually assaulting people.. you were spot on the 'more thought'.. maybe they will stash some porn mags and that will keep them in check.. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think it is dangerous - I have work colleagues who's wives wouldn't let them opt for the block to be lifted. There is likely to be a significant rise is sexual assault and rape if you tamper with this sort of thing. This needs more thought. you are seriously suggesting that cos some guys may have their internet access limited or curtailed.. that some of them will turn into rapists and start sexually assaulting people.. you were spot on the 'more thought'.. Just proposing a theory that the social effects of mass sexual repression should not be played with to gain political popularity. Are you an expert in this field? maybe they will stash some porn mags and that will keep them in check.. " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think it is dangerous - I have work colleagues who's wives wouldn't let them opt for the block to be lifted. There is likely to be a significant rise is sexual assault and rape if you tamper with this sort of thing. This needs more thought. you are seriously suggesting that cos some guys may have their internet access limited or curtailed.. that some of them will turn into rapists and start sexually assaulting people.. you were spot on the 'more thought'.. Just proposing a theory that the social effects of mass sexual repression should not be played with to gain political popularity. Are you an expert in this field? maybe they will stash some porn mags and that will keep them in check.. " you don't need to be an 'expert' in any field to see that what you are saying is some plucked out of the air comment.. nothing to back it up, no references and no sensible reason to think there would or possibly may be what you theorise.. agree that the proposal is a populist move and said so previously on the thread.. 'sexual repression', please.. even if the scheme could be implemented (many 'experts' indeed doubt it)it wont stop you or I accessing porn if we so choose.. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It will all be forgotten about within a few months, Cameron will utter those inevitable words....."Not until after the 2015 election" Pre election rhetoric " like the smoking and alcohol issue he espoused then u turned on.. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think it is dangerous - I have work colleagues who's wives wouldn't let them opt for the block to be lifted. There is likely to be a significant rise is sexual assault and rape if you tamper with this sort of thing. This needs more thought. you are seriously suggesting that cos some guys may have their internet access limited or curtailed.. that some of them will turn into rapists and start sexually assaulting people.. you were spot on the 'more thought'.. Just proposing a theory that the social effects of mass sexual repression should not be played with to gain political popularity. Are you an expert in this field? maybe they will stash some porn mags and that will keep them in check.. you don't need to be an 'expert' in any field to see that what you are saying is some plucked out of the air comment.. nothing to back it up, no references and no sensible reason to think there would or possibly may be what you theorise.. agree that the proposal is a populist move and said so previously on the thread.. 'sexual repression', please.. even if the scheme could be implemented (many 'experts' indeed doubt it)it wont stop you or I accessing porn if we so choose.. " have you had a wank today yet? You seem very tense! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" even if the scheme could be implemented (many 'experts' indeed doubt it)it wont stop you or I accessing porn if we so choose.. " I see a rise in anonymous VPN subscriptions! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think it is dangerous - I have work colleagues who's wives wouldn't let them opt for the block to be lifted. There is likely to be a significant rise is sexual assault and rape if you tamper with this sort of thing. This needs more thought. you are seriously suggesting that cos some guys may have their internet access limited or curtailed.. that some of them will turn into rapists and start sexually assaulting people.. you were spot on the 'more thought'.. Just proposing a theory that the social effects of mass sexual repression should not be played with to gain political popularity. Are you an expert in this field? maybe they will stash some porn mags and that will keep them in check.. you don't need to be an 'expert' in any field to see that what you are saying is some plucked out of the air comment.. nothing to back it up, no references and no sensible reason to think there would or possibly may be what you theorise.. agree that the proposal is a populist move and said so previously on the thread.. 'sexual repression', please.. even if the scheme could be implemented (many 'experts' indeed doubt it)it wont stop you or I accessing porn if we so choose.. have you had a wank today yet? You seem very tense! " Being sexually tense doesn't turn you into a rapist. However you may become more snappy and lose your temper more. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" have you had a wank today yet? You seem very tense! " am pretty chilled ty.. that your only response then..? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Maybe they should apply similar efforts to block shite from PPI companies, fake Viagra companies, personal injury companies, people trying to sell me fucking phone contracts, people trying to sell shit I already own, Nigerian scam artists and annoying bloody god bothering wank stains trying to save my soul- now that would be a more popular use of time and energy " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Maybe they should apply similar efforts to block shite from PPI companies, fake Viagra companies, personal injury companies, people trying to sell me fucking phone contracts, people trying to sell shit I already own, Nigerian scam artists and annoying bloody god bothering wank stains trying to save my soul- now that would be a more popular use of time and energy " Spot on another government time and money waister, as if that's going to stop VPN and other private networks. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"dont know if this has already been asked... BUT ,,,, would FAB be considered pornographic, if this does come into play (sorry its a long thread) " That would most likely depend on how they choose to define it I should imagine. If they use terms like 'adult content' in the legislation then it may well affect sites like this. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"dont know if this has already been asked... BUT ,,,, would FAB be considered pornographic, if this does come into play (sorry its a long thread) That would most likely depend on how they choose to define it I should imagine. If they use terms like 'adult content' in the legislation then it may well affect sites like this." I asked this earlier in this thread and I got told it did. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |