FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Online pornography to be blocked by default, PM to announce

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Every household in the UK is to have pornography blocked by their internet provider unless they choose to receive it, David Cameron is to announce.

In addition, Mr Cameron will say possessing online pornography depicting rape will be illegal, bringing England and Wales in line with Scotland.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23401076

would thats means this site as well?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Oh no we'll all have to fess up to liking sex , how embarrassing.

Are you worried if you have to opt in OP ? I'm not.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow

Relax. It's no more than a Cameron diversionary tactic which has been overtaken by the imminent birth of a wean.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Aslong as your not a massive asexual tory werido all you have to do is say yes to your internet provider and then you get your porn back. I think thats pretty much the top and bottom of it. Such a good government strategy, I think not.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I cant wait to ask my boss to ring the internet provider up to opt out of adult blocking. Should be interesting

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I think its a great move. I also understand looking at the worst type of porno will be made illegal!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

As i said in the other thread on this, the most stupidest and pointless piece of legislation.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Oh no we'll all have to fess up to liking sex , how embarrassing.

Are you worried if you have to opt in OP ? I'm not. "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Maybe they should apply similar efforts to block shite from PPI companies, fake Viagra companies, personal injury companies, people trying to sell me fucking phone contracts, people trying to sell shit I already own, Nigerian scam artists and annoying bloody god bothering wank stains trying to save my soul- now that would be a more popular use of time and energy

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Maybe they should apply similar efforts to block shite from PPI companies, fake Viagra companies, personal injury companies, people trying to sell me fucking phone contracts, people trying to sell shit I already own, Nigerian scam artists and annoying bloody god bothering wank stains trying to save my soul- now that would be a more popular use of time and energy "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Maybe they should apply similar efforts to block shite from PPI companies, fake Viagra companies, personal injury companies, people trying to sell me fucking phone contracts, people trying to sell shit I already own, Nigerian scam artists and annoying bloody god bothering wank stains trying to save my soul- now that would be a more popular use of time and energy "

Some kinds of porn do need blocking but I agree that the above "Internet shite" should be blocked too

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I cant wait to ask my boss to ring the internet provider up to opt out of adult blocking. Should be interesting"

(y)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tomComMan
over a year ago

Wellingborough

I bet that ISP's will have to keep a record of everyone that has asked for the blokes to be removed.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Maybe they should apply similar efforts to block shite from PPI companies, fake Viagra companies, personal injury companies, people trying to sell me fucking phone contracts, people trying to sell shit I already own, Nigerian scam artists and annoying bloody god bothering wank stains trying to save my soul- now that would be a more popular use of time and energy

Some kinds of porn do need blocking but I agree that the above "Internet shite" should be blocked too "

Do they need blocking or is it a good way to track those interested in more dangerous pursuits?

This sounds very similar to the ott reaction after Dunblane when the government pretty much wiped out target shooting clubs who were operating perfectly safely, to help cut gun crime- well that worked out well didn't it?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

All of the worst stuff is on the dark web any how so people are not using google to find it. It's found using the tor browser and I'm not technically savy enough to know whether a simple isp porn ban is going to stop this. You can find all sorts on the dark web apparently I've used it for accessing silk road which is like ebay for every imaginable drug you could ever want. Apparently you can hire hitmen and all on it, not that I've ever required a hitman.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Firstly this will take time to implement and all the ISP's will have to agree on the blocking filters.

Secondly it is virtually impossible to both police this and track it, the cost are completely unjustifiable.

Thirdly as i already said in another post it is so easy to circumvent making it totally pointless.

Totally agree that child porn etc should be blocked or removed but reality it is a pointless task because someone somewhere will find a way.

If you think all this is scary just be thankful you dont know about the deep web !! Now that really is scary !!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow

[Removed by poster at 22/07/13 11:58:02]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow


"I think its a great move. I also understand looking at the worst type of porno will be made illegal!"

It's illegal at the moment.

Making things illegal is easy. Actually stopping people doing illegal things is the tricky bit.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I think its a great move. I also understand looking at the worst type of porno will be made illegal!

It's illegal at the moment.

Making things illegal is easy. Actually stopping people doing illegal things is the tricky bit."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire

another pile of crap populism from the Coalition that has cut funding to many of the Agencies who catch the user's of that vile type of media..

pity he didn't have the same sized bollocks when sorting out big alcohol and big tobacco..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow


"another pile of crap populism from the Coalition that has cut funding to many of the Agencies who catch the user's of that vile type of media..

pity he didn't have the same sized bollocks when sorting out big alcohol and big tobacco..

"

The problem's the same. Lynton Crosby.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Call Me Dave is gonna tell us what he's gonna do on Jeremy Whine on Radio 2 shortly

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


"another pile of crap populism from the Coalition that has cut funding to many of the Agencies who catch the user's of that vile type of media..

pity he didn't have the same sized bollocks when sorting out big alcohol and big tobacco..

The problem's the same. Lynton Crosby."

That will be the same none advising advisor who also owns a company advising err big tobacco, but didn't give any advice at all ever on the plain packaging..

suppose in the number 10 household they get freebies..

does have a knack of choosing some interesting 'advisors'..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tomComMan
over a year ago

Wellingborough


"Firstly this will take time to implement and all the ISP's will have to agree on the blocking filters.

Secondly it is virtually impossible to both police this and track it, the cost are completely unjustifiable.

Thirdly as i already said in another post it is so easy to circumvent making it totally pointless.

Totally agree that child porn etc should be blocked or removed but reality it is a pointless task because someone somewhere will find a way.

If you think all this is scary just be thankful you dont know about the deep web !! Now that really is scary !! "

Child porn is illegal! it has been illegal for many years! No ISP as far as I know has knowingly let people view or make child porn.

Search engines like Google have always removed links to sites that show child porn as soon as they are pointed out!

I am not sure what the hell the PM is getting at?

People use the internet as a communication tool, people create sites and content. Sometimes these sites or content in them are illegal. Why is it the ISP's fault if people do this? It is the people that are creating them or viewing them that are breaking the law.

It is like telling Royal mail that they need to open every letter and parcel to check the contents.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow


"Call Me Dave is gonna tell us what he's gonna do on Jeremy Whine on Radio 2 shortly"

He tried telling Woman's Hour back at 10.00 this morning but fared no better than he did when gralloched by an under par Andrew Marr yesterday.

Watch out for how Cameron tries to dodge the reduction in real terms funding for CEOPs.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

This is coming from the torries!! trust me they have more to worry about than any of us, years of covered up child molesting by highly respected torry mp's, so whats the question gonna be "do you like porn or not?" if you do say yes your a dirty pervert peado, desperate tactics by Cameron to get some sort of public acknowledgement! by moving his party away from child molesting accusation in past few years!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tomComMan
over a year ago

Wellingborough


"I think its a great move. I also understand looking at the worst type of porno will be made illegal!

It's illegal at the moment.

Making things illegal is easy. Actually stopping people doing illegal things is the tricky bit."

I agree, but I think we need more personal responsibility. It is not for the government to block everything we do just in case.

We need better define laws and better define punishments. And when someone breaks a law they need to be punished.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


"

I am not sure what the hell the PM is getting at? "

May 2015..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow


"I think its a great move. I also understand looking at the worst type of porno will be made illegal!

It's illegal at the moment.

Making things illegal is easy. Actually stopping people doing illegal things is the tricky bit.

I agree, but I think we need more personal responsibility. It is not for the government to block everything we do just in case.

We need better define laws and better define punishments. And when someone breaks a law they need to be punished. "

It can't be done.

If the banks with all their IT wizzardry and money can't stop phishing etc and the big multinationals with similar resources can't stop others hacking their systems, if terrorists can continue to use cyberspace to hide and plot, despite the best endeavours of GCHQ and the Pentagon, what chance do we have with a few quid and a plan hastily written on the back of a fag packet (in the spaces between the print).

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tomComMan
over a year ago

Wellingborough


"

I am not sure what the hell the PM is getting at?

May 2015.."

So to win the election the PM is giving us what we think we want, they really we have no idea what we want?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow


"

I am not sure what the hell the PM is getting at?

May 2015.."

Trying to get Lynton Crosby out of the headlines.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Aslong as your not a massive asexual tory werido all you have to do is say yes to your internet provider and then you get your porn back. I think thats pretty much the top and bottom of it. Such a good government strategy, I think not."

Phrasing!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tomComMan
over a year ago

Wellingborough


"I think its a great move. I also understand looking at the worst type of porno will be made illegal!

It's illegal at the moment.

Making things illegal is easy. Actually stopping people doing illegal things is the tricky bit.

I agree, but I think we need more personal responsibility. It is not for the government to block everything we do just in case.

We need better define laws and better define punishments. And when someone breaks a law they need to be punished.

It can't be done.

If the banks with all their IT wizzardry and money can't stop phishing etc and the big multinationals with similar resources can't stop others hacking their systems, if terrorists can continue to use cyberspace to hide and plot, despite the best endeavours of GCHQ and the Pentagon, what chance do we have with a few quid and a plan hastily written on the back of a fag packet (in the spaces between the print)."

We have good laws already! We just need to be able to enforce them. At the moment it seems like we are not able to.

How often have you heard of a case of someone committing a crime, but it seems to go on for ages and ages.

People are not being punished! and people see that people are not being punished so just carry on committing crimes.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


"

I am not sure what the hell the PM is getting at?

May 2015..

So to win the election the PM is giving us what we think we want, they really we have no idea what we want?"

has any Government known what we want, or actually given a toss once in office that they renege on much of what the promise..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

I am not sure what the hell the PM is getting at?

May 2015..

So to win the election the PM is giving us what we think we want, they really we have no idea what we want?

has any Government known what we want, or actually given a toss once in office that they renege on much of what the promise..

"

+

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"

I am not sure what the hell the PM is getting at?

May 2015..

So to win the election the PM is giving us what we think we want, they really we have no idea what we want?

has any Government known what we want, or actually given a toss once in office that they renege on much of what the promise..

"
ofcourse they haven't

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rumCoupleCouple
over a year ago

birmingham

I notice most people have missed the bit where search engines will be made to report people who search for certain terms.

You know, like the way the Chinese arrest people for searching for "Tainamen Square".

I wonder what words might bring the bully boys around ? "Lynton Crosby" perhaps ? "Tory party Jimmy Savile" perchance ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


"I notice most people have missed the bit where search engines will be made to report people who search for certain terms.

You know, like the way the Chinese arrest people for searching for "Tainamen Square".

I wonder what words might bring the bully boys around ? "Lynton Crosby" perhaps ? "Tory party Jimmy Savile" perchance ?"

Schh..

for some on here mentioning the Tory party in anything but glowing sycophantic terms will have you sent off to your own forum..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Ok so how does it work when you live in a shared house ?? Lets say 5 people using the same internet access ??

2 want to look at porn and the rest dont ?? Its all bollocks and almost impossible to deploy.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

If you want to watch rape why not go to prison and wait your turn anything that protects children from perverts is worth it and if you have to ask your isp to allow porn whats the hardship

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hocksandmissusCouple
over a year ago

Chester-ish

my 1 pence worth

isp companies will have to keep a record of who has opted in to having porn back on there pcs now this maybe not to bad till you get that knock on your door asking you why you are involved in adult web sites when you have children in the house also will be interesting to see how swingers are held in society when all fully listed in these records more so when you have ppl like Philip schofield calling us the grunt squad on national tv xxxxxxxxxxx

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rumCoupleCouple
over a year ago

birmingham

In reality, all this will do is drive people to use VPN providers as standard, meaning they effectively disappear off the grid. Thus making it *harder* to catch bad'uns.

Which tells you that this move is nothing to do with catching bad'uns, and everything to do with creeping state surveillance.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It's ok when I can't get hold if any porn I usually think about Samantha Cameron anyway so there will be a lot more of that lol

But seriously are they trying to tell me that there are more sex offenders now we have the Internet so they are going to have a knee jerk reaction every time something bad happens, I can still go on to search engines and find out how to do all manor of evil without going any where near a porn site.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Like Boris and his flippin airport - wait till Cameron finds out exactly what is involved in doing this, it'll be quietly dropped..... pity someone can't quietly drop him... spineless twat..

ted.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *igSuki81Man
over a year ago

Retirement Village


"Maybe they should apply similar efforts to block shite from PPI companies, fake Viagra companies, personal injury companies, people trying to sell me fucking phone contracts, people trying to sell shit I already own, Nigerian scam artists and annoying bloody god bothering wank stains trying to save my soul- now that would be a more popular use of time and energy "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

So this site will be blocked right?

Imagine the phone calls

"Hello [your isp]"

"Oh hi, I'd like to ask big brother to take the porn lock off my net"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *b430Man
over a year ago

Tayside


"I bet that ISP's will have to keep a record of everyone that has asked for the blokes to be removed. "

The females will get removed too unless it's Gay Porn of course

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23401076

Just wondered how they will decide what sites are blocked would sites like fab be blocked. Will it work the same way as mobile phones?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *urreyfun2008Man
over a year ago

East Grinstead

Well Fab will be in the block as the site is adult content and the network filtering of the mobile operators may operate in how you turn on/off differently to your home broadband but yes similar issues with over and under blocking.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tomComMan
over a year ago

Wellingborough


"http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23401076

Just wondered how they will decide what sites are blocked would sites like fab be blocked. Will it work the same way as mobile phones? "

What about the people that will have to go though every site on the internet and give it a rating? Actually they will have to go though every page on every internet site.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tomComMan
over a year ago

Wellingborough


"Well Fab will be in the block as the site is adult content and the network filtering of the mobile operators may operate in how you turn on/off differently to your home broadband but yes similar issues with over and under blocking."

Internet porn filters are like using big square holes to filter out flour. It will only work if the bits you are filtering out are big and not square shaped.

Filters can only block what they are told to block. Unless a site is marked some how as porn then how can it be blocked?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

So, we're all just going to bellyache about this and say "nanny state" surely someone can see the bigger picture here?

If they can glide through a bill to block or track porn sites, then maybe a bill to block or track everything else they deem necessary.

How about political opponent points of view?

Bad news stories about them?

How about being fed what someone else wants to feed you, rather than free choice?

Where there's a will there's a way, the paedo sicko's will find another way, but the rest of us have to ask permission to view what we want to see.

Why not monitor the paedo's properly, get them some physiological help and chemical castration at the same time! Take away their desires and give them a way to rewire their sickness.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *allDarkFoxForYouMan
over a year ago

Winchester/London

Blocking casino and bingo sites would do more to benefit society

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

For sake of argument if you were to google how do i find pedo in my area to see if neighbour has been convicted of an offence could the fact you type pedo in the search make you a suspicious person by authorities.

In principal its great idea but policing in correct and fair way will be difficult.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tomComMan
over a year ago

Wellingborough


"So, we're all just going to bellyache about this and say "nanny state" surely someone can see the bigger picture here?

If they can glide through a bill to block or track porn sites, then maybe a bill to block or track everything else they deem necessary.

How about political opponent points of view?

Bad news stories about them?

How about being fed what someone else wants to feed you, rather than free choice?

Where there's a will there's a way, the paedo sicko's will find another way, but the rest of us have to ask permission to view what we want to see.

Why not monitor the paedo's properly, get them some physiological help and chemical castration at the same time! Take away their desires and give them a way to rewire their sickness.

"

I think the problem is that some people believe that anyone who accesses porn are peados and rapist. They believe all people that are viewing such material needs to be monitored.

Then again these are the same people that think if you do not go to a COE church every Sunday you are some sort of terrorist.

(I guessing I have just put myself on some sort of watch list now, I have mentioned the words Peado, porn and terrorist on the same post)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tomComMan
over a year ago

Wellingborough


"For sake of argument if you were to google how do i find pedo in my area to see if neighbour has been convicted of an offence could the fact you type pedo in the search make you a suspicious person by authorities.

In principal its great idea but policing in correct and fair way will be difficult."

As you have mention the word Pedo on a swinging site you are now on a GCHQ and NSA watch list

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *wfirsttimersCouple
over a year ago

kendal


"

...

How often have you heard of a case of someone committing a crime, but it seems to go on for ages and ages.

People are not being punished! ...

"

Exactly, if the 2 twats who clearly murdered lee rigby are being held as murder SUSPECTS. The justice system in this country is already flawed. Imagine how hard it will be for the authorities to convict an IP address !

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atasha_DavidCouple
over a year ago

Slough


"

If they can glide through a bill to block or track porn sites, then maybe a bill to block or track everything else they deem necessary.

How about political opponent points of view?

Bad news stories about them?

How about being fed what someone else wants to feed you, rather than free choice?

"

Give that man a cigar!

They tried dancing with the devil and Murdoch and co. shat on their shoes so now they are going to jump on the bandwagon with cries of "we must protect the little ones" to basically repeal a right to a free media.

If kiddie or violent porn, which is already illegal, is available on the public internet then let him gather a group of selected independent journalists, free speech campaigners and a couple of high court judges and demonstrate it at a randomly chosen location, so no freaked searches etc.

He will not be able to.

Google, all major UK ISP's, the Internet Watch Foundation, CEOPS, Microsoft etc etc all work quietly and effectively to remove it.

This shit is traded person to person via encrypted files on filesharing sites. The police know this but are letting him run because it will get them more money and power to abuse.

Cameron is "threatening" Google, f**k that made me laugh. Maybe the guys in Mountain View should teach him a lesson as to where the real power on the net lies and just remove any mention of him for a few days.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It will never happen to any effective degree its as simple as that.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tomComMan
over a year ago

Wellingborough


"

If they can glide through a bill to block or track porn sites, then maybe a bill to block or track everything else they deem necessary.

How about political opponent points of view?

Bad news stories about them?

How about being fed what someone else wants to feed you, rather than free choice?

Give that man a cigar!

They tried dancing with the devil and Murdoch and co. shat on their shoes so now they are going to jump on the bandwagon with cries of "we must protect the little ones" to basically repeal a right to a free media.

If kiddie or violent porn, which is already illegal, is available on the public internet then let him gather a group of selected independent journalists, free speech campaigners and a couple of high court judges and demonstrate it at a randomly chosen location, so no freaked searches etc.

He will not be able to.

Google, all major UK ISP's, the Internet Watch Foundation, CEOPS, Microsoft etc etc all work quietly and effectively to remove it.

This shit is traded person to person via encrypted files on filesharing sites. The police know this but are letting him run because it will get them more money and power to abuse.

Cameron is "threatening" Google, f**k that made me laugh. Maybe the guys in Mountain View should teach him a lesson as to where the real power on the net lies and just remove any mention of him for a few days. "

Yep, the PM is saying that ISPs should be blocking sites that contain illegal material.

One simple question for the PM. How would an ISP know a site contains illegal material?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

If they can glide through a bill to block or track porn sites, then maybe a bill to block or track everything else they deem necessary.

How about political opponent points of view?

Bad news stories about them?

How about being fed what someone else wants to feed you, rather than free choice?

Give that man a cigar!

They tried dancing with the devil and Murdoch and co. shat on their shoes so now they are going to jump on the bandwagon with cries of "we must protect the little ones" to basically repeal a right to a free media.

If kiddie or violent porn, which is already illegal, is available on the public internet then let him gather a group of selected independent journalists, free speech campaigners and a couple of high court judges and demonstrate it at a randomly chosen location, so no freaked searches etc.

He will not be able to.

Google, all major UK ISP's, the Internet Watch Foundation, CEOPS, Microsoft etc etc all work quietly and effectively to remove it.

This shit is traded person to person via encrypted files on filesharing sites. The police know this but are letting him run because it will get them more money and power to abuse.

Cameron is "threatening" Google, f**k that made me laugh. Maybe the guys in Mountain View should teach him a lesson as to where the real power on the net lies and just remove any mention of him for a few days.

Yep, the PM is saying that ISPs should be blocking sites that contain illegal material.

One simple question for the PM. How would an ISP know a site contains illegal material?"

They cant thats the whole point, it would be virtually impossible to keep an up to date catalogue of every site UK based let alone on the world wide web.

UK government were told before if they wanted to track the UK's net activity for one day they would need an aircraft hanger full to the brim with servers and thats just for ONE DAY's worth of surfing !!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tomComMan
over a year ago

Wellingborough


"

If they can glide through a bill to block or track porn sites, then maybe a bill to block or track everything else they deem necessary.

How about political opponent points of view?

Bad news stories about them?

How about being fed what someone else wants to feed you, rather than free choice?

Give that man a cigar!

They tried dancing with the devil and Murdoch and co. shat on their shoes so now they are going to jump on the bandwagon with cries of "we must protect the little ones" to basically repeal a right to a free media.

If kiddie or violent porn, which is already illegal, is available on the public internet then let him gather a group of selected independent journalists, free speech campaigners and a couple of high court judges and demonstrate it at a randomly chosen location, so no freaked searches etc.

He will not be able to.

Google, all major UK ISP's, the Internet Watch Foundation, CEOPS, Microsoft etc etc all work quietly and effectively to remove it.

This shit is traded person to person via encrypted files on filesharing sites. The police know this but are letting him run because it will get them more money and power to abuse.

Cameron is "threatening" Google, f**k that made me laugh. Maybe the guys in Mountain View should teach him a lesson as to where the real power on the net lies and just remove any mention of him for a few days.

Yep, the PM is saying that ISPs should be blocking sites that contain illegal material.

One simple question for the PM. How would an ISP know a site contains illegal material?

They cant thats the whole point, it would be virtually impossible to keep an up to date catalogue of every site UK based let alone on the world wide web.

UK government were told before if they wanted to track the UK's net activity for one day they would need an aircraft hanger full to the brim with servers and thats just for ONE DAY's worth of surfing !! "

Instead of put controls on what people can watch, listen to, read, eat and drink. Maybe the government should be finding way of punishing people that have committed real crimes !

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

If they can glide through a bill to block or track porn sites, then maybe a bill to block or track everything else they deem necessary.

How about political opponent points of view?

Bad news stories about them?

How about being fed what someone else wants to feed you, rather than free choice?

Give that man a cigar!

They tried dancing with the devil and Murdoch and co. shat on their shoes so now they are going to jump on the bandwagon with cries of "we must protect the little ones" to basically repeal a right to a free media.

If kiddie or violent porn, which is already illegal, is available on the public internet then let him gather a group of selected independent journalists, free speech campaigners and a couple of high court judges and demonstrate it at a randomly chosen location, so no freaked searches etc.

He will not be able to.

Google, all major UK ISP's, the Internet Watch Foundation, CEOPS, Microsoft etc etc all work quietly and effectively to remove it.

This shit is traded person to person via encrypted files on filesharing sites. The police know this but are letting him run because it will get them more money and power to abuse.

Cameron is "threatening" Google, f**k that made me laugh. Maybe the guys in Mountain View should teach him a lesson as to where the real power on the net lies and just remove any mention of him for a few days.

Yep, the PM is saying that ISPs should be blocking sites that contain illegal material.

One simple question for the PM. How would an ISP know a site contains illegal material?

They cant thats the whole point, it would be virtually impossible to keep an up to date catalogue of every site UK based let alone on the world wide web.

UK government were told before if they wanted to track the UK's net activity for one day they would need an aircraft hanger full to the brim with servers and thats just for ONE DAY's worth of surfing !!

Instead of put controls on what people can watch, listen to, read, eat and drink. Maybe the government should be finding way of punishing people that have committed real crimes !"

Absolutely we would also like to know how they are gonna police the already convicted sex offenders that are on the register ?? Maybe they should have their internet removed completely or software installed to stop them looking ??

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *wingerdelightCouple
over a year ago

eastliegh

it seems all very 1984 to me, is watching porn bad- no. is it wrong to let pedos watch porn bad- no. is letting pedos watch child porn bad- yes. is letting children watch porn bad- not really, i remember watching porn and reading porn mags as a kid, if its out there kids will find a way. is having porn beeing thrust on kids bad- yes. but im not sure this is happening. would an opt in system stop pedos watching child porn-no.

seems like a vote grabbing move from a struggling goverment.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tomComMan
over a year ago

Wellingborough


"it seems all very 1984 to me, is watching porn bad- no. is it wrong to let pedos watch porn bad- no. is letting pedos watch child porn bad- yes. is letting children watch porn bad- not really, i remember watching porn and reading porn mags as a kid, if its out there kids will find a way. is having porn beeing thrust on kids bad- yes. but im not sure this is happening. would an opt in system stop pedos watching child porn-no.

seems like a vote grabbing move from a struggling goverment."

How many parents would have the blocks kept on?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If you want to watch rape why not go to prison and wait your turn anything that protects children from perverts is worth it and if you have to ask your isp to allow porn whats the hardship "

I would agree, except this measure protects nobody from anything. It's smoke and mirrors that achieves nothing and costs lots but not directly through the government so they don't have to mention that.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tomComMan
over a year ago

Wellingborough


"If you want to watch rape why not go to prison and wait your turn anything that protects children from perverts is worth it and if you have to ask your isp to allow porn whats the hardship

I would agree, except this measure protects nobody from anything. It's smoke and mirrors that achieves nothing and costs lots but not directly through the government so they don't have to mention that."

More red tape, more mid managers getting money for doing not a lot.

I am a true conservative and I can say that this is not a conservative policy. Conservatives so not believe in restricting people!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tomComMan
over a year ago

Wellingborough


"If you want to watch rape why not go to prison and wait your turn anything that protects children from perverts is worth it and if you have to ask your isp to allow porn whats the hardship

I would agree, except this measure protects nobody from anything. It's smoke and mirrors that achieves nothing and costs lots but not directly through the government so they don't have to mention that."

If the PM was worried about this sort thing why has he cut funding to "Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre". Surely if he was really worried about this sort of stuff he would be increasing funding !

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rumCoupleCouple
over a year ago

birmingham


"If you want to watch rape why not go to prison and wait your turn anything that protects children from perverts is worth it and if you have to ask your isp to allow porn whats the hardship

I would agree, except this measure protects nobody from anything. It's smoke and mirrors that achieves nothing and costs lots but not directly through the government so they don't have to mention that.

More red tape, more mid managers getting money for doing not a lot.

I am a true conservative and I can say that this is not a conservative policy. Conservatives so not believe in restricting people!"

er, which conservative government in the past 50 years has come close to "not restricting people".

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Or could it be the groundwork for paying for the internet . now i dont have a problem with porn i freely admit to glancing at it occasionlly so opting in is no problem to me but if it werent for porn the internet would still be just a few ragedy strands

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 22/07/13 17:48:46]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I have long been an advocate of upstream internet filtering of adult content sites in order to protect those under the age of 16.

For a while now, many mobile internet providers have had age-restriction locks on their internet provision.

An opt-out for the upstream blocking is available - its a simple tick box / phone call, whatever and unfiltered service is resumed. Don't you think thats a small inconvenience to offer better protection for kids out there?

--

However, what is more insidious are the plans to illegalise certain themes witin pronogrpahic contect which, have up till now, been allowed - with no rationale behind them other than they have obviously got someone panties in a knot. I think thats the real story here, not that we need a ticky box to access Fab or any other site.

Its rather like cigarettes. I'm happy to have them for sale behind plain doors because the choice is there for me to smoke or not (and people will still choose to do so despite the risks) without advertising them directly to Children - I'm not happy when the Government tells me the brands I can and cannot smoke and arbitrarily decides to ban Park Drive for the good of the country!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I think people worry too much!

I had to phone my mobile network provider to ask for adult content to be unlocked on my phone. Took 2 minutes and no questions asked!

And as re only porn I'd ever view would not breach any current legislation - if I have to do the same with my ISP - I'll happily make another 2 minute phone call!

And no amount of paranoia, scaremongering or cynicism about political motives will worry me!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I think this site will be affected if it happens as in work. They have done this as some people have been caught watching porn in work. Anyway since then. I can't get on fab on my phone in work. When I try the address changes several times Worthing a few seconds, by itself and one of the addresses says "block" and a budge of characters, etc. Then the wifi homepage of my workplace comes up. So I think this kind of action will affect all fab users and I think the runner of the website should contact whoever to sort it out.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"And as re only porn I'd ever view would not breach any current legislation - if I have to do the same with my ISP - I'll happily make another 2 minute phone call!"

As will every 12 year old boy... But the government can pretend they did something.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham

[Removed by poster at 22/07/13 18:02:18]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham


"I think this site will be affected if it happens as in work. They have done this as some people have been caught watching porn in work. Anyway since then. I can't get on fab on my phone in work. When I try the address changes several times Worthing a few seconds, by itself and one of the addresses says "block" and a budge of characters, etc. Then the wifi homepage of my workplace comes up. So I think this kind of action will affect all fab users and I think the runner of the website should contact whoever to sort it out."

Why on earth would you access a sex site on your works internet???

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"And as re only porn I'd ever view would not breach any current legislation - if I have to do the same with my ISP - I'll happily make another 2 minute phone call!

As will every 12 year old boy... But the government can pretend they did something."

12 yr old boys won't have passed the credit check for the contract though will they!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I think this site will be affected if it happens as in work. They have done this as some people have been caught watching porn in work. Anyway since then. I can't get on fab on my phone in work. When I try the address changes several times Worthing a few seconds, by itself and one of the addresses says "block" and a budge of characters, etc. Then the wifi homepage of my workplace comes up. So I think this kind of action will affect all fab users and I think the runner of the website should contact whoever to sort it out.

Why on earth would you access a sex site on your works internet??? "

And even if you did/could - if access was revoked by your company - how is that the site owners responsibility??

Wise up!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

One i think will be funny are the people that rent a property or room in a house and the internet is supplied by the landlord, can see a few red faces when asking the landlord to remove the porn filter !!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham


"One i think will be funny are the people that rent a property or room in a house and the internet is supplied by the landlord, can see a few red faces when asking the landlord to remove the porn filter !! "

That's me and my landlord is my dad lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"One i think will be funny are the people that rent a property or room in a house and the internet is supplied by the landlord, can see a few red faces when asking the landlord to remove the porn filter !!

That's me and my landlord is my dad lol "

Ha ha ha lmao pmsl !!! " Dad dad remove the filter i wanna get on Fab " lmao !!!!

Sorry lol that really tickled me

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ranny-CrumpetWoman
over a year ago

The Town by The Cross

[Removed by poster at 22/07/13 18:12:50]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

While I don't object in principle, I do object to the fact that it's actually another spin to waste time and money for no actual achievement. Parental control is and has been available for a long time, but only responsible parents use it, and those are the ones who will not ask the kids to set up the home WiFi for them!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I think this site will be affected if it happens as in work. They have done this as some people have been caught watching porn in work. Anyway since then. I can't get on fab on my phone in work. When I try the address changes several times Worthing a few seconds, by itself and one of the addresses says "block" and a budge of characters, etc. Then the wifi homepage of my workplace comes up. So I think this kind of action will affect all fab users and I think the runner of the website should contact whoever to sort it out.

Why on earth would you access a sex site on your works internet???

And even if you did/could - if access was revoked by your company - how is that the site owners responsibility??

Wise up! "

Someone got caught using the staffs computer to watch/download porn .

Since then though I can't access fab on my phone. I reply to my messages for this site. Not exactly porn is it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

However, the other annoying fact in all this....

Cameron's announcement today was leaked to the press a week ago. There is a good article on The Register about it all.

Effectively, his 'handwavium' approach to restricting the internet has been to apply pressure privately to the larger Telcos and ISPs to implement it, then announce it to the nation as 'A really good idea, using the power of political spin to pressure the ISPs into having to invest in the framework to do it - without Government funding!

Still, as long as the Tory faithful can still get their 'Gagging on Fruit' porn I'm sure everyone will be happy....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Cracking idea....!!!!

If I want it I can ask for it....

Some free Wi fi hotspots already censor.... Try logging on to Fabs in Maccy Ds.....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Porn is a natural thing and yes it should be monitored, but not ban it. They should spend their time trying to cure hackers, cold callers, etc. Sick of checking my emails first before I open up a certain email to show my parents because of all the spam that is being sent to my inbox

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham


"I think this site will be affected if it happens as in work. They have done this as some people have been caught watching porn in work. Anyway since then. I can't get on fab on my phone in work. When I try the address changes several times Worthing a few seconds, by itself and one of the addresses says "block" and a budge of characters, etc. Then the wifi homepage of my workplace comes up. So I think this kind of action will affect all fab users and I think the runner of the website should contact whoever to sort it out.

Why on earth would you access a sex site on your works internet???

And even if you did/could - if access was revoked by your company - how is that the site owners responsibility??

Wise up!

Someone got caught using the staffs computer to watch/download porn .

Since then though I can't access fab on my phone. I reply to my messages for this site. Not exactly porn is it "

No, a site where you message people for sex and can see pictures of cocks and gaping cum filled pussies isn't porn, silly me

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I think this site will be affected if it happens as in work. They have done this as some people have been caught watching porn in work. Anyway since then. I can't get on fab on my phone in work. When I try the address changes several times Worthing a few seconds, by itself and one of the addresses says "block" and a budge of characters, etc. Then the wifi homepage of my workplace comes up. So I think this kind of action will affect all fab users and I think the runner of the website should contact whoever to sort it out.

Why on earth would you access a sex site on your works internet???

And even if you did/could - if access was revoked by your company - how is that the site owners responsibility??

Wise up!

Someone got caught using the staffs computer to watch/download porn .

Since then though I can't access fab on my phone. I reply to my messages for this site. Not exactly porn is it

No, a site where you message people for sex and can see pictures of cocks and gaping cum filled pussies isn't porn, silly me "

Well if you wanted to wank over something. You wouldn't come on here would you? Unless you were going to have a last minute meet with a member. Which a lot of people don't do.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham


"I think this site will be affected if it happens as in work. They have done this as some people have been caught watching porn in work. Anyway since then. I can't get on fab on my phone in work. When I try the address changes several times Worthing a few seconds, by itself and one of the addresses says "block" and a budge of characters, etc. Then the wifi homepage of my workplace comes up. So I think this kind of action will affect all fab users and I think the runner of the website should contact whoever to sort it out.

Why on earth would you access a sex site on your works internet???

And even if you did/could - if access was revoked by your company - how is that the site owners responsibility??

Wise up!

Someone got caught using the staffs computer to watch/download porn .

Since then though I can't access fab on my phone. I reply to my messages for this site. Not exactly porn is it

No, a site where you message people for sex and can see pictures of cocks and gaping cum filled pussies isn't porn, silly me

Well if you wanted to wank over something. You wouldn't come on here would you? Unless you were going to have a last minute meet with a member. Which a lot of people don't do. "

So all those people on cam pulling their lodger aren't wanking then?? Wonder what they are doing lol

Just because you don't use it to wank doesn't mean it's not a porn site. It has adult content not meant for underage eyes.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 22/07/13 18:41:41]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'll let you have that. Maybe they can block that part of the site. Sure it can be done

Many films say it contains adult content. Doesn't mean its porn either.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The big thing that I've taken from this the illegitimate of images depicting rape not that I personal find the attraction in rape fantasys but the question I have to ask is who decides what depicts rape as many of use on here have pics from events that a prod would say it is and bang that's you nicked

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

This is all just another money making, controlling the public, spin doctor load of election crap !!!

So heres my say to Mr C.

" Dear Dave,

After listening to you interview this afternoon with Jeremy Vine regarding the filters you intend to deploy on all pornography on the internet in the UK I have only this to say to you.....

Get a grip you egotistical idiot, instead of wasting hundreds of thousands of tax payers and companies money on a pointless waste of time concentrate on getting the country back to where it should be and leave us to wank, shag and oggle as much porn as we want to. Just cos you have 4 kids and probably dont get any anymore dont punish the British public !! Instead concentrate on the scam emails, prolific paedophiles and thieving bank managers let alone the rest of the scumbags getting away with murder etc that you seem to think are ok to roam are streets !!!!

To the people of the UK i say wank away, watch as much porn as your eyes and bits can handle !! Spank your monkey till your blind, rub one out till you cant see for your eyesight will soon be unable to savour the delights of porn no more !!

Here endeth my rant and as for you Dave grow a pair and do something useful for once

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"This is all just another money making, controlling the public, spin doctor load of election crap !!!

So heres my say to Mr C.

" Dear Dave,

After listening to you interview this afternoon with Jeremy Vine regarding the filters you intend to deploy on all pornography on the internet in the UK I have only this to say to you.....

Get a grip you egotistical idiot, instead of wasting hundreds of thousands of tax payers and companies money on a pointless waste of time concentrate on getting the country back to where it should be and leave us to wank, shag and oggle as much porn as we want to. Just cos you have 4 kids and probably dont get any anymore dont punish the British public !! Instead concentrate on the scam emails, prolific paedophiles and thieving bank managers let alone the rest of the scumbags getting away with murder etc that you seem to think are ok to roam are streets !!!!

To the people of the UK i say wank away, watch as much porn as your eyes and bits can handle !! Spank your monkey till your blind, rub one out till you cant see for your eyesight will soon be unable to savour the delights of porn no more !!

Here endeth my rant and as for you Dave grow a pair and do something useful for once "

Guess you'll be opting IN then....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inky BunnyMan
over a year ago

Cardiff


"Cracking idea....!!!!

If I want it I can ask for it....

Some free Wi fi hotspots already censor.... Try logging on to Fabs in Maccy Ds..... "

Go to KFC you can there

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Genuine question but how is pornography defined and who does it. One of Cameron's statements was that anyone in possession of internet based pornography simulating rape will be jailed. So if I decide to watch 'A Clockwork Orange' once this passes am I likely to be highly regarding for watching a film by one of the most revered directors of the 20th Century or a soon to be criminal because of the graphic content, specifically the rape scene in that film.

Also, what will the economic impact on the adult entertainment industry be. How much revenue is going to be lost because people will feel awkward having to ask permission to go and look at porn.

For me the problem isn't internet porn, just like it wasn't hip hop, video games, violent movies etc, etc. It just seems to be yet another easy target for Daily Mail readers to latch onto, although ironically if you do venture on to the their website and look at the bikini clad pictures on their, maybe they'll be blocked as well. And that might just be a price worth paying

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'm not worried about opting in, though I wish they'd just create a xxx domain to replace the www for porn sites, which nobody seems to want to do. I do hate the way they mix up "porn" and "child porn" in these discussions though. Cameron does it, and for some reason the media never want to set him or the reader straight. They also try to give the impression that it's dead easy to find child porn on the net, which is nonsense. Many of the paedo sites on the web are owned by the law enforcement agencies with the aim of catching out sad idiots.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I think it is dangerous - I have work colleagues who's wives wouldn't let them opt for the block to be lifted.

There is likely to be a significant rise is sexual assault and rape if you tamper with this sort of thing.

This needs more thought.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

If this is in the interests of safety, and considering the 7/7 attacks were carried out by fundamentalist Muslims- I look forward to Cameron's announcement on his plan to block all religious sites in the grounds that a few people are dangerous so nobody is allowed to play unless they ask to- good luck Dave, the big society is all in this together eh?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I have no issue with opting in if needs be, but am a bit irritated by the fact that everyone is being censored because some parents can't be bothered to monitor what their children view on the internet...which I know may make me unpopular with some people! My concern will be what is classed as legal/illegal? Will any kind of kink be deemed to be illegal? A lot of the more popular videos on the likes of sex and submission involve some kind of forced play so would me viewing these be deemed as illegal despite the fact the scenes all are conducted by consenting adults? Spanking could be deemed as being violent...will this be illegal? Will we only be allowed to watch porn that shows missionary sex after clear consent has been discussed by the stars!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

They may take our lives , but they'll never take our pornographhhhhhhy!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


"I think it is dangerous - I have work colleagues who's wives wouldn't let them opt for the block to be lifted.

There is likely to be a significant rise is sexual assault and rape if you tamper with this sort of thing.

This needs more thought. "

you are seriously suggesting that cos some guys may have their internet access limited or curtailed..

that some of them will turn into rapists and start sexually assaulting people..

you were spot on the 'more thought'..

maybe they will stash some porn mags and that will keep them in check..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I think it is dangerous - I have work colleagues who's wives wouldn't let them opt for the block to be lifted.

There is likely to be a significant rise is sexual assault and rape if you tamper with this sort of thing.

This needs more thought.

you are seriously suggesting that cos some guys may have their internet access limited or curtailed..

that some of them will turn into rapists and start sexually assaulting people..

you were spot on the 'more thought'..

Just proposing a theory that the social effects of mass sexual repression should not be played with to gain political popularity.

Are you an expert in this field?

maybe they will stash some porn mags and that will keep them in check.. "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atisfy janeWoman
over a year ago

Torquay

It will all be forgotten about within a few months, Cameron will utter those inevitable words....."Not until after the 2015 election"

Pre election rhetoric

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


"I think it is dangerous - I have work colleagues who's wives wouldn't let them opt for the block to be lifted.

There is likely to be a significant rise is sexual assault and rape if you tamper with this sort of thing.

This needs more thought.

you are seriously suggesting that cos some guys may have their internet access limited or curtailed..

that some of them will turn into rapists and start sexually assaulting people..

you were spot on the 'more thought'..

Just proposing a theory that the social effects of mass sexual repression should not be played with to gain political popularity.

Are you an expert in this field?

maybe they will stash some porn mags and that will keep them in check.. "

you don't need to be an 'expert' in any field to see that what you are saying is some plucked out of the air comment..

nothing to back it up, no references and no sensible reason to think there would or possibly may be what you theorise..

agree that the proposal is a populist move and said so previously on the thread..

'sexual repression', please..

even if the scheme could be implemented (many 'experts' indeed doubt it)it wont stop you or I accessing porn if we so choose..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


"It will all be forgotten about within a few months, Cameron will utter those inevitable words....."Not until after the 2015 election"

Pre election rhetoric "

like the smoking and alcohol issue he espoused then u turned on..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I think it is dangerous - I have work colleagues who's wives wouldn't let them opt for the block to be lifted.

There is likely to be a significant rise is sexual assault and rape if you tamper with this sort of thing.

This needs more thought.

you are seriously suggesting that cos some guys may have their internet access limited or curtailed..

that some of them will turn into rapists and start sexually assaulting people..

you were spot on the 'more thought'..

Just proposing a theory that the social effects of mass sexual repression should not be played with to gain political popularity.

Are you an expert in this field?

maybe they will stash some porn mags and that will keep them in check..

you don't need to be an 'expert' in any field to see that what you are saying is some plucked out of the air comment..

nothing to back it up, no references and no sensible reason to think there would or possibly may be what you theorise..

agree that the proposal is a populist move and said so previously on the thread..

'sexual repression', please..

even if the scheme could be implemented (many 'experts' indeed doubt it)it wont stop you or I accessing porn if we so choose..

"
have you had a wank today yet?

You seem very tense!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

even if the scheme could be implemented (many 'experts' indeed doubt it)it wont stop you or I accessing porn if we so choose..

"

I see a rise in anonymous VPN subscriptions!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I think it is dangerous - I have work colleagues who's wives wouldn't let them opt for the block to be lifted.

There is likely to be a significant rise is sexual assault and rape if you tamper with this sort of thing.

This needs more thought.

you are seriously suggesting that cos some guys may have their internet access limited or curtailed..

that some of them will turn into rapists and start sexually assaulting people..

you were spot on the 'more thought'..

Just proposing a theory that the social effects of mass sexual repression should not be played with to gain political popularity.

Are you an expert in this field?

maybe they will stash some porn mags and that will keep them in check..

you don't need to be an 'expert' in any field to see that what you are saying is some plucked out of the air comment..

nothing to back it up, no references and no sensible reason to think there would or possibly may be what you theorise..

agree that the proposal is a populist move and said so previously on the thread..

'sexual repression', please..

even if the scheme could be implemented (many 'experts' indeed doubt it)it wont stop you or I accessing porn if we so choose..

have you had a wank today yet?

You seem very tense! "

Being sexually tense doesn't turn you into a rapist. However you may become more snappy and lose your temper more.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Strangely, when anyone suggests bringing sex and relationship education into primary and secondary schools, no government wants to know.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


"

have you had a wank today yet?

You seem very tense! "

am pretty chilled ty..

that your only response then..?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

At first I thought that the PM was simply pandering to the mummynet voters, but then I though no and that there could be more to it than that which warrants consideration.

Firstly, there almost seems to be an implied link between if you look at porn then you might be a pedo and need watching.

Which is crazy I know, but are those who do opt in more likely to get a knock on the door if something horrible happens in their own neighbourhood? Time will tell, but I wouldn't put money against it.

Secondly is this so called popular policy just a backdoor way to setup systems that could just as easily be used to monitor other forms of activity that this or any future government deems worthy of repressing or blocking? If so, then there goes free speech not with a bang but with a whimper.

Thirdly, Child exploitation in any form is abhorrent no matter if its from sexual exploitation, abuse, female genital mutilation or sweat shops run by big multi-nationals. Nothing in this policy will actually do anything to protect or rescue a single child. Not one.

Fourthly, what about all the ways parents can - and do - block sites already? And if the policy is designed to save childhood then why not target drug and alcohol related sites? Or what of videos online showing violence? Even on YouTube you can find, if you want, sickening scenes of violence and injury, both fake and real, that certainly could scar a child for life. What's going to be done about these? Nothing as no votes in those hills.

Sadly this is just another pointer to the fact that as a society we, the general population, are suffering under a political class that becomes more detached from reality and self absorbed with each passing month. Now the only thing that motivates politicians is an unending quest for self gratification, money and power set against an all consuming fear of losing that power should they come second at the ballot box. That ultimately would mean finical loss as they would not any longer be able to take bribes from all their friends in business or the lobbyists to whom our politicians seen all to happy to, indeed eager, to prostitute themselves to, no matter how bad that might be for you or me.

Rant over and now I await a visit from the Ministry of Love and a visit to Room 101. For the record I like to remind everyone of my widely know fear of having a good night out on the town!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lubcouple2Couple
over a year ago

newport


"Maybe they should apply similar efforts to block shite from PPI companies, fake Viagra companies, personal injury companies, people trying to sell me fucking phone contracts, people trying to sell shit I already own, Nigerian scam artists and annoying bloody god bothering wank stains trying to save my soul- now that would be a more popular use of time and energy "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *urreynudistMan
over a year ago

staines

sign the Gevernment e-petition that has been started to campaign against this (google "government e-petitions" it is currently the top trending petition)

it won't do any good (they will ignore it) but still worth a go

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Maybe they should apply similar efforts to block shite from PPI companies, fake Viagra companies, personal injury companies, people trying to sell me fucking phone contracts, people trying to sell shit I already own, Nigerian scam artists and annoying bloody god bothering wank stains trying to save my soul- now that would be a more popular use of time and energy "

Spot on another government time and money waister, as if that's going to stop VPN and other private networks.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

One of these days some journalist is going to examine all the "proposals" Mr Cameron since he took office and see how many of them got anywhere towards the statute book, or even further discussion. I think they're mostly just fillers for the press, almost always impractical.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oodmessMan
over a year ago

yumsville

dont know if this has already been asked... BUT ,,,, would FAB be considered pornographic, if this does come into play

(sorry its a long thread)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *B9 QueenWoman
over a year ago

Over the rainbow, under the bridge


"dont know if this has already been asked... BUT ,,,, would FAB be considered pornographic, if this does come into play

(sorry its a long thread)

"

That would most likely depend on how they choose to define it I should imagine. If they use terms like 'adult content' in the legislation then it may well affect sites like this.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"dont know if this has already been asked... BUT ,,,, would FAB be considered pornographic, if this does come into play

(sorry its a long thread)

That would most likely depend on how they choose to define it I should imagine. If they use terms like 'adult content' in the legislation then it may well affect sites like this."

I asked this earlier in this thread and I got told it did.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

let have an opt in for sale call any one call for sale or doing a survey or text is breaking the law unless you opt in to a list. breaking this is law in 6 months in prison. Be a lot more use full.

They block piratebay for all of 2 hours before a work around was found. Anyone looking for the image know how to fine them and get round the block to try and stop you from getting them.

Then we have what is porn! half naked girl is same pic of a man is not why?

Most of the block software is a pin in the bum. We have it at work, it is a pain trying to look up faults and the apple site is block. Cannot down load a file from Microsoft. But youtube is fully open?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *odareyouMan
over a year ago

not far from iceland,,,,,, tescos is nearer though :-) (near leeds)

I heard a joke along the lines,,

He's The biggest wanker in the country,, and he wants to block internet porn,

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top