Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Personally don't believe he is clean, but congrats to him all the same." well I`m sure he will be found out if he is not clean, but what makes you think k he`s not? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Personally don't believe he is clean, but congrats to him all the same." theres always one! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Good old British public, build them up and then try and destroy then" here here wiggo n froom n team are a british team n to hear fellow brits doubt there own is so sad, SHAME ON YOU! YI SHOULD BE PROUD OF THEM ! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Personally don't believe he is clean, but congrats to him all the same." So you're congratulating someone you believe to be a cheat? Team Sky have released all of his training data to an independent expert picked by a French newspaper. He confirmed that Froome's performances are statistically normal. He has also been tested over 14 times during the tour and they have all come back clean. But let's not let the facts get in the way of a good witch hunt eh? Well done Chris, to win the biggest event in cycling by over 5 mins is an amazing achievement. And a special mention to domestique extraordinaire Richie Porte. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Personally don't believe he is clean, but congrats to him all the same. So you're congratulating someone you believe to be a cheat? Team Sky have released all of his training data to an independent expert picked by a French newspaper. He confirmed that Froome's performances are statistically normal. He has also been tested over 14 times during the tour and they have all come back clean. But let's not let the facts get in the way of a good witch hunt eh? Well done Chris, to win the biggest event in cycling by over 5 mins is an amazing achievement. And a special mention to domestique extraordinaire Richie Porte." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Personally don't believe he is clean, but congrats to him all the same." really .. even though he has been drug tested over a dozen times ?? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Personally don't believe he is clean, but congrats to him all the same. So you're congratulating someone you believe to be a cheat? Team Sky have released all of his training data to an independent expert picked by a French newspaper. He confirmed that Froome's performances are statistically normal. He has also been tested over 14 times during the tour and they have all come back clean. But let's not let the facts get in the way of a good witch hunt eh? Well done Chris, to win the biggest event in cycling by over 5 mins is an amazing achievement. And a special mention to domestique extraordinaire Richie Porte." Richie Porte does indeed deserve a special mention Can't wait for the final stage later on | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We wait 80 odd year for a British winner then like buses 2 come together,well done Chris Froome" And the fact that he is obviously doped doesn't seem to be a problem for anyone... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We wait 80 odd year for a British winner then like buses 2 come together,well done Chris Froome And the fact that he is obviously doped doesn't seem to be a problem for anyone... " He wasn't that much of a dope the other day when blatantly breaking race rules to avoid losing minutes. Only to lose 20 secs and 140 euros or so. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We wait 80 odd year for a British winner then like buses 2 come together,well done Chris Froome And the fact that he is obviously doped doesn't seem to be a problem for anyone... " ?wheres the proof eh??? come on spit it out! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"leave em alone they are not all cheats like to see some of you lot ride up the col de la colombiere and if you not know what it is google it . at least they work hard n not chase a bag of wind round a field and get paid thousands to do so ,and i do know what im talking about ive seen le tour .been there and watched it x" I agree: the guys in the back, fighting everyday to finish in time, they're not cheating! But Froome is going faster than Armstrong (who wasn't only using water to fuel his effort!) and, if you read the international press (especially the french one), you'll discover that his health records are not exactly clear... And for having cycled regularly on some of the hills/moutains roads used during the Tour, I know the amount of effort it takes... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Personally don't believe he is clean, but congrats to him all the same." What do you base that on? You an expert in the science of doping in sport? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"leave em alone they are not all cheats like to see some of you lot ride up the col de la colombiere and if you not know what it is google it . at least they work hard n not chase a bag of wind round a field and get paid thousands to do so ,and i do know what im talking about ive seen le tour .been there and watched it x I agree: the guys in the back, fighting everyday to finish in time, they're not cheating! But Froome is going faster than Armstrong (who wasn't only using water to fuel his effort!) and, if you read the international press (especially the french one), you'll discover that his health records are not exactly clear... And for having cycled regularly on some of the hills/moutains roads used during the Tour, I know the amount of effort it takes..." So by your rather flimsy theory anyone who has ran faster than ben johnsons winstrol boosted time must also be on steroids.?? Goo job you are not a judge! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"leave em alone they are not all cheats like to see some of you lot ride up the col de la colombiere and if you not know what it is google it . at least they work hard n not chase a bag of wind round a field and get paid thousands to do so ,and i do know what im talking about ive seen le tour .been there and watched it x I agree: the guys in the back, fighting everyday to finish in time, they're not cheating! But Froome is going faster than Armstrong (who wasn't only using water to fuel his effort!) and, if you read the international press (especially the french one), you'll discover that his health records are not exactly clear... And for having cycled regularly on some of the hills/moutains roads used during the Tour, I know the amount of effort it takes..." yawn! so yi dont have any proof then? ya just goin of wot yi read in the press ! tut tut! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"leave em alone they are not all cheats like to see some of you lot ride up the col de la colombiere and if you not know what it is google it . at least they work hard n not chase a bag of wind round a field and get paid thousands to do so ,and i do know what im talking about ive seen le tour .been there and watched it x I agree: the guys in the back, fighting everyday to finish in time, they're not cheating! But Froome is going faster than Armstrong (who wasn't only using water to fuel his effort!) and, if you read the international press (especially the french one), you'll discover that his health records are not exactly clear... And for having cycled regularly on some of the hills/moutains roads used during the Tour, I know the amount of effort it takes..." There is plenty of speculation that he is doping because of that. There is also the fact that less than 2 years ago he was so mediocre that he was out of contract, a decision SKY reversed after the 2011 Vuelta and the improvement is pretty unbelievable. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We wait 80 odd year for a British winner then like buses 2 come together,well done Chris Froome And the fact that he is obviously doped doesn't seem to be a problem for anyone... " WoW he's a dope Cheat, I'll just Chang my post We wait 80 odd years then 2 come together, well done Chris Froome, However apparently you took dope according to some but who am I to argue they know best | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" There is plenty of speculation that he is doping because of that. There is also the fact that less than 2 years ago he was so mediocre that he was out of contract, a decision SKY reversed after the 2011 Vuelta and the improvement is pretty unbelievable. " do they not always point to the fact he had "Bilharzia" and that it wasn't properly diagnosed or treated before he got to sky | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" There is plenty of speculation that he is doping because of that. There is also the fact that less than 2 years ago he was so mediocre that he was out of contract, a decision SKY reversed after the 2011 Vuelta and the improvement is pretty unbelievable. do they not always point to the fact he had "Bilharzia" and that it wasn't properly diagnosed or treated before he got to sky " Yeah but he'd been with SKY since they launched and done nothing. He had already been told they weren;t renewing his contract before the Vuelta. That is why they made him work for Wiggins, because he was expected to crack, as it was it was Wiggins that cracked (relatively speaking) and if they had backed Froome he'd most likely have won. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We wait 80 odd year for a British winner then like buses 2 come together,well done Chris Froome And the fact that he is obviously doped doesn't seem to be a problem for anyone... He wasn't that much of a dope the other day when blatantly breaking race rules to avoid losing Only to lose 20 secs and 140 euros or so. " quite agree froome was out of fuel! Nothing left in the tank so needed a sugar hit not drugs !! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We wait 80 odd year for a British winner then like buses 2 come together,well done Chris Froome And the fact that he is obviously doped doesn't seem to be a problem for anyone... He wasn't that much of a dope the other day when blatantly breaking race rules to avoid losing Only to lose 20 secs and 140 euros or so. quite agree froome was out of fuel! Nothing left in the tank so needed a sugar hit not drugs !!" Not saying he needed drugs. The rules were made clear, take on board as much food/fuel as you want/need before the start of the second climb up Alpe D'Huez. Itself an extension on the normal distance rule. Had Froome slowed up and waited for his team car, as others did, he would have lost touch with such as Quintano and Contador at the bottom and not had the free tow up the hill, most likely losing minutes. Very lucky he was only penalised 20 seconds. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Oh come on guys, the bloke and 168 others have just finished a race everyone on here could not do in 3 months let alone 3 weeks, he won by 5 mins (ok 4.20 but he waited on the last stage) not 10 or 15. He was never actually on his own the whole time, he always had other cyclists around him and not his team either, so does that mean they are doping too??? Ok the guys that came 2nd and third and forth are they doping also as they beat the 10 place guy by 7 or 8 mins so what does that say??? I find it very sad that guys give up a very big part of their lives to take part in these sports and all people can do is pull them down when they achieve their goal the strive so hard to get. SHAME ON YOU " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Oh come on guys, the bloke and 168 others have just finished a race everyone on here could not do in 3 months let alone 3 weeks, he won by 5 mins (ok 4.20 but he waited on the last stage) not 10 or 15. He was never actually on his own the whole time, he always had other cyclists around him and not his team either, so does that mean they are doping too??? Ok the guys that came 2nd and third and forth are they doping also as they beat the 10 place guy by 7 or 8 mins so what does that say??? I find it very sad that guys give up a very big part of their lives to take part in these sports and all people can do is pull them down when they achieve their goal the strive so hard to get. SHAME ON YOU " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He was never actually on his own the whole time, he always had other cyclists around him and not his team either, so does that mean they are doping too??? Ok the guys that came 2nd and third and forth are they doping also as they beat the 10 place guy by 7 or 8 mins so what does that say??? " Let's have a look at some of their histories then. Contador, previous ban for doping. Rides for Saxon bank a team managed by an unapologetic self confessed ex-doper who is one of only a handful team managers to have ignored the gentleman agreement not to sign convicted doers. Kreuziger. Rides for the same team as Contador. Has previously confessed to working with notorious coach Michelle ferrari who is banned from the sport Valervede. Another convicted doper. Rides for a team with a very dodgy past who are another to have ignored the gentleman agreement about signing previously banned riders. Ridriguez. Rides for a team so dodgy that the UCI wouldn't give them a license to race at the start of this season. And after over a decade in the sport has only ridden in teams that have been involved in doping scandals while he has been one of their riders. The Belkin riders. The team formerly known as rabobank who infamously sacked Michael Rasmussen when he was in the yellow jersey when it became apparent he was facing a ban. Rabobank ended their sponsorship early this year after numerous doping scandals but honoured their financial commitment such was their eagerness to not have their brand tarnished further. All circumstantial but lets put this in the context of a sport where almost every GC rider of the last 20 being subsequently discredited. In my opinion doping is still rife and will be until such time that those promoting and policing the sport are separated. It is unbelievable that those still governing the sport took bribes from Armstrong. As for Sky, I hope they are clean but I'm not convened and like many that are longterm fans, a lifetime of scandals coupled with numerous new beginnings, it will take a longtime for that cynicism to fade. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |