FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Do we live in a free country ?

Jump to newest
 

By *tomCom OP   Man
over a year ago

Wellingborough

I have to ask this, as it seem each day there seems to be something new people want to stop us doing.

Today it is children should not be allowed to take packet lunches as they are often not healthy.

If we live in a free country should we be allowed to do what we want, as long as it does not harm others?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *layfullsamMan
over a year ago

Solihull


"I have to ask this, as it seem each day there seems to be something new people want to stop us doing.

Today it is children should not be allowed to take packet lunches as they are often not healthy.

If we live in a free country should we be allowed to do what we want, as long as it does not harm others?"

Only if we go down the route of everyone having to have there own private medical insurance so parents can feed there kids crap and when they end up unhealthy there insurance pays for the hospital etc

that way everyone can do what they want drink smoke do drugs etc but others don't have to pick up the bill

Only a thought

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I have to ask this, as it seem each day there seems to be something new people want to stop us doing.

Today it is children should not be allowed to take packet lunches as they are often not healthy.

If we live in a free country should we be allowed to do what we want, as long as it does not harm others?"

Could you name another country that has the sort of unregulated freedom your suggesting

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *layfullsamMan
over a year ago

Solihull


"I have to ask this, as it seem each day there seems to be something new people want to stop us doing.

Today it is children should not be allowed to take packet lunches as they are often not healthy.

If we live in a free country should we be allowed to do what we want, as long as it does not harm others?

Could you name another country that has the sort of unregulated freedom your suggesting "

norfolk

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *layfullsamMan
over a year ago

Solihull


"I have to ask this, as it seem each day there seems to be something new people want to stop us doing.

Today it is children should not be allowed to take packet lunches as they are often not healthy.

If we live in a free country should we be allowed to do what we want, as long as it does not harm others?

Could you name another country that has the sort of unregulated freedom your suggesting "

norfolk

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *layfullsamMan
over a year ago

Solihull

oops sorry thought you said county

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I have to ask this, as it seem each day there seems to be something new people want to stop us doing.

Today it is children should not be allowed to take packet lunches as they are often not healthy.

If we live in a free country should we be allowed to do what we want, as long as it does not harm others?

Could you name another country that has the sort of unregulated freedom your suggesting

norfolk"

Oi gerroff my land.....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tomCom OP   Man
over a year ago

Wellingborough


"I have to ask this, as it seem each day there seems to be something new people want to stop us doing.

Today it is children should not be allowed to take packet lunches as they are often not healthy.

If we live in a free country should we be allowed to do what we want, as long as it does not harm others?

Could you name another country that has the sort of unregulated freedom your suggesting "

You could argue that no country is free. The only really freedom we have is to vote for who we want as our local MP. We do not get to choose who is in the cabinet, we do not get to choice the PM. We also have no say in who is in the house of Lords.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lackshadow7Man
over a year ago

Toronto

A totally free country would be similar to the lawless Wild West.

So no.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I have to ask this, as it seem each day there seems to be something new people want to stop us doing.

Today it is children should not be allowed to take packet lunches as they are often not healthy.

If we live in a free country should we be allowed to do what we want, as long as it does not harm others?

Could you name another country that has the sort of unregulated freedom your suggesting

You could argue that no country is free. The only really freedom we have is to vote for who we want as our local MP. We do not get to choose who is in the cabinet, we do not get to choice the PM. We also have no say in who is in the house of Lords."

So which country's system do you envy?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I have to ask this, as it seem each day there seems to be something new people want to stop us doing.

Today it is children should not be allowed to take packet lunches as they are often not healthy.

If we live in a free country should we be allowed to do what we want, as long as it does not harm others?

Could you name another country that has the sort of unregulated freedom your suggesting

You could argue that no country is free. The only really freedom we have is to vote for who we want as our local MP. We do not get to choose who is in the cabinet, we do not get to choice the PM. We also have no say in who is in the house of Lords.

So which country's system do you envy? "

Holland

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *isscheekychopsWoman
over a year ago

The land of grey peas and bacon

I'd say we have got a pretty good system...we could learn from countries like Denmark though..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *layfullsamMan
over a year ago

Solihull


"A totally free country would be similar to the lawless Wild West.

So no."

guns, cow girls, gunslinging duels with someone you don't like sounds good to me

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I have to ask this, as it seem each day there seems to be something new people want to stop us doing.

Today it is children should not be allowed to take packet lunches as they are often not healthy.

If we live in a free country should we be allowed to do what we want, as long as it does not harm others?

Could you name another country that has the sort of unregulated freedom your suggesting

You could argue that no country is free. The only really freedom we have is to vote for who we want as our local MP. We do not get to choose who is in the cabinet, we do not get to choice the PM. We also have no say in who is in the house of Lords.

So which country's system do you envy?

Holland "

Ok so what is it about the Dutch system and their way of life do you feel is better than ours? ....

....and which parts of the Dutch system and way of life do you feel are not as good as we have here?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *isscheekychopsWoman
over a year ago

The land of grey peas and bacon

Denmark- got strict immigration policy which is good however they are firm but fair...they have their own immigration issues with residents from Greenland.

Benefits- they don't allow you to sit on your arse for 20 years without having a job unless of course you can't work etc...they have a good pension system too...Housing they don't have social housing as such but have a low homeless rate..

Denmark is very green it uses more windmill thingy whatever they are called and it's cleaner then here..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tomCom OP   Man
over a year ago

Wellingborough


"I'd say we have got a pretty good system...we could learn from countries like Denmark though.."

So you do not mind other people telling you what you can eat, drink, read, watch etc? You my think I am being over the top and silly but if you look at some of the draft bills coming though you might be a little shocked.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tomCom OP   Man
over a year ago

Wellingborough


"Denmark- got strict immigration policy which is good however they are firm but fair...they have their own immigration issues with residents from Greenland.

Benefits- they don't allow you to sit on your arse for 20 years without having a job unless of course you can't work etc...they have a good pension system too...Housing they don't have social housing as such but have a low homeless rate..

Denmark is very green it uses more windmill thingy whatever they are called and it's cleaner then here.."

ooo windmill thingy, well that is a whole different forum topic in itself.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *isscheekychopsWoman
over a year ago

The land of grey peas and bacon


"I'd say we have got a pretty good system...we could learn from countries like Denmark though..

So you do not mind other people telling you what you can eat, drink, read, watch etc? You my think I am being over the top and silly but if you look at some of the draft bills coming though you might be a little shocked."

I don't let anyone tell me what I can eat drink etc. I do what I want

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iss_tressWoman
over a year ago

London

In my experience people feel free and generally happy with their lot. People can recommend what they like, we are free to ignore them and follow our own path.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I have to ask this, as it seem each day there seems to be something new people want to stop us doing.

Today it is children should not be allowed to take packet lunches as they are often not healthy.

If we live in a free country should we be allowed to do what we want, as long as it does not harm others?

Could you name another country that has the sort of unregulated freedom your suggesting

You could argue that no country is free. The only really freedom we have is to vote for who we want as our local MP. We do not get to choose who is in the cabinet, we do not get to choice the PM. We also have no say in who is in the house of Lords.

So which country's system do you envy?

Holland

Ok so what is it about the Dutch system and their way of life do you feel is better than ours? ....

....and which parts of the Dutch system and way of life do you feel are not as good as we have here? "

Legalising drugs, hard core pornography on terrestrial TV, err that's it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *layfullsamMan
over a year ago

Solihull


"Denmark- got strict immigration policy which is good however they are firm but fair...they have their own immigration issues with residents from Greenland.

Benefits- they don't allow you to sit on your arse for 20 years without having a job unless of course you can't work etc...they have a good pension system too...Housing they don't have social housing as such but have a low homeless rate..

Denmark is very green it uses more windmill thingy whatever they are called and it's cleaner then here.."

and the girls are gorgeous

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *isscheekychopsWoman
over a year ago

The land of grey peas and bacon

Holland have their own issues too..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *isscheekychopsWoman
over a year ago

The land of grey peas and bacon


"Denmark- got strict immigration policy which is good however they are firm but fair...they have their own immigration issues with residents from Greenland.

Benefits- they don't allow you to sit on your arse for 20 years without having a job unless of course you can't work etc...they have a good pension system too...Housing they don't have social housing as such but have a low homeless rate..

Denmark is very green it uses more windmill thingy whatever they are called and it's cleaner then here..

and the girls are gorgeous "

I know we can't help it...lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Denmark- got strict immigration policy which is good however they are firm but fair...they have their own immigration issues with residents from Greenland.

Benefits- they don't allow you to sit on your arse for 20 years without having a job unless of course you can't work etc...they have a good pension system too...Housing they don't have social housing as such but have a low homeless rate..

Denmark is very green it uses more windmill thingy whatever they are called and it's cleaner then here..

and the girls are gorgeous "

Yeah,,,, but Sam .... with the population of Denmark only being about five and a half million,,,, your chances of pulling over there aint looking all that good mate...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tomCom OP   Man
over a year ago

Wellingborough


"I'd say we have got a pretty good system...we could learn from countries like Denmark though..

So you do not mind other people telling you what you can eat, drink, read, watch etc? You my think I am being over the top and silly but if you look at some of the draft bills coming though you might be a little shocked.

I don't let anyone tell me what I can eat drink etc. I do what I want "

That is my point, we are getting to the point where the government will tell you what you can eat and drink. If schools can tell parents that their children are not allowed to bring packet lunches and have to have school meals then where would it end?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *layfullsamMan
over a year ago

Solihull


"Denmark- got strict immigration policy which is good however they are firm but fair...they have their own immigration issues with residents from Greenland.

Benefits- they don't allow you to sit on your arse for 20 years without having a job unless of course you can't work etc...they have a good pension system too...Housing they don't have social housing as such but have a low homeless rate..

Denmark is very green it uses more windmill thingy whatever they are called and it's cleaner then here..

and the girls are gorgeous

I know we can't help it...lol "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *layfullsamMan
over a year ago

Solihull


"Denmark- got strict immigration policy which is good however they are firm but fair...they have their own immigration issues with residents from Greenland.

Benefits- they don't allow you to sit on your arse for 20 years without having a job unless of course you can't work etc...they have a good pension system too...Housing they don't have social housing as such but have a low homeless rate..

Denmark is very green it uses more windmill thingy whatever they are called and it's cleaner then here..

and the girls are gorgeous

I know we can't help it...lol "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tomCom OP   Man
over a year ago

Wellingborough


"In my experience people feel free and generally happy with their lot. People can recommend what they like, we are free to ignore them and follow our own path.

"

They are not just recommending! There are plans a foot to allow schools to ban packed lunches!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *wingerdelightCouple
over a year ago

eastliegh


"Denmark- got strict immigration policy which is good however they are firm but fair...they have their own immigration issues with residents from Greenland.

Benefits- they don't allow you to sit on your arse for 20 years without having a job unless of course you can't work etc...they have a good pension system too...Housing they don't have social housing as such but have a low homeless rate..

Denmark is very green it uses more windmill thingy whatever they are called and it's cleaner then here.."

mrs swinger is danish and we visit there alot as she still has family there, it is by no means perfect, the tax they pay is huge, double what we pay here, yes the standard of life is better, but not as much as people might think

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *isscheekychopsWoman
over a year ago

The land of grey peas and bacon


"I'd say we have got a pretty good system...we could learn from countries like Denmark though..

So you do not mind other people telling you what you can eat, drink, read, watch etc? You my think I am being over the top and silly but if you look at some of the draft bills coming though you might be a little shocked.

I don't let anyone tell me what I can eat drink etc. I do what I want

That is my point, we are getting to the point where the government will tell you what you can eat and drink. If schools can tell parents that their children are not allowed to bring packet lunches and have to have school meals then where would it end?"

I don't have children but if I did I would be asking for the calorie count etc for school dinners that have been unhealthy and it has been uncovered....Jaime Oliver did something to make them healthy....until I believe that my child is eating healthy I will be sending them to school with a healthy packed lunch.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *isscheekychopsWoman
over a year ago

The land of grey peas and bacon


"Denmark- got strict immigration policy which is good however they are firm but fair...they have their own immigration issues with residents from Greenland.

Benefits- they don't allow you to sit on your arse for 20 years without having a job unless of course you can't work etc...they have a good pension system too...Housing they don't have social housing as such but have a low homeless rate..

Denmark is very green it uses more windmill thingy whatever they are called and it's cleaner then here..

mrs swinger is danish and we visit there alot as she still has family there, it is by no means perfect, the tax they pay is huge, double what we pay here, yes the standard of life is better, but not as much as people might think"

Maybe but I am Danish also...yes the tax is high but wages reflect that

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Denmark- got strict immigration policy which is good however they are firm but fair...they have their own immigration issues with residents from Greenland.

Benefits- they don't allow you to sit on your arse for 20 years without having a job unless of course you can't work etc...they have a good pension system too...Housing they don't have social housing as such but have a low homeless rate..

Denmark is very green it uses more windmill thingy whatever they are called and it's cleaner then here.."

I'm not knocking Demark,,,,But like many so called green counties Denmark has quite a productive hydro carbons industry that exports oil and gas to countries that are not so green ……

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tomCom OP   Man
over a year ago

Wellingborough


"I'd say we have got a pretty good system...we could learn from countries like Denmark though..

So you do not mind other people telling you what you can eat, drink, read, watch etc? You my think I am being over the top and silly but if you look at some of the draft bills coming though you might be a little shocked.

I don't let anyone tell me what I can eat drink etc. I do what I want

That is my point, we are getting to the point where the government will tell you what you can eat and drink. If schools can tell parents that their children are not allowed to bring packet lunches and have to have school meals then where would it end?

I don't have children but if I did I would be asking for the calorie count etc for school dinners that have been unhealthy and it has been uncovered....Jaime Oliver did something to make them healthy....until I believe that my child is eating healthy I will be sending them to school with a healthy packed lunch. "

You would not have the choice! Some schools well be allowed to ban packed lunches. It is not like we live in a free country

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *isscheekychopsWoman
over a year ago

The land of grey peas and bacon


"Denmark- got strict immigration policy which is good however they are firm but fair...they have their own immigration issues with residents from Greenland.

Benefits- they don't allow you to sit on your arse for 20 years without having a job unless of course you can't work etc...they have a good pension system too...Housing they don't have social housing as such but have a low homeless rate..

Denmark is very green it uses more windmill thingy whatever they are called and it's cleaner then here..

I'm not knocking Demark,,,,But like many so called green counties Denmark has quite a productive hydro carbons industry that exports oil and gas to countries that are not so green …… "

Lol they have good and bad...I am no means saying Denmark is this wonderful country it has it's issues...The same with Britain I like it here no major complaints apart from I need a pay rise lol.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *isscheekychopsWoman
over a year ago

The land of grey peas and bacon


"I'd say we have got a pretty good system...we could learn from countries like Denmark though..

So you do not mind other people telling you what you can eat, drink, read, watch etc? You my think I am being over the top and silly but if you look at some of the draft bills coming though you might be a little shocked.

I don't let anyone tell me what I can eat drink etc. I do what I want

That is my point, we are getting to the point where the government will tell you what you can eat and drink. If schools can tell parents that their children are not allowed to bring packet lunches and have to have school meals then where would it end?

I don't have children but if I did I would be asking for the calorie count etc for school dinners that have been unhealthy and it has been uncovered....Jaime Oliver did something to make them healthy....until I believe that my child is eating healthy I will be sending them to school with a healthy packed lunch.

You would not have the choice! Some schools well be allowed to ban packed lunches. It is not like we live in a free country"

Then I would send them to a school that allowed pack lunches I will not let anyone dictate to me what MY child could eat...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tomCom OP   Man
over a year ago

Wellingborough

[Removed by poster at 12/07/13 10:23:46]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tomCom OP   Man
over a year ago

Wellingborough


"I'd say we have got a pretty good system...we could learn from countries like Denmark though..

So you do not mind other people telling you what you can eat, drink, read, watch etc? You my think I am being over the top and silly but if you look at some of the draft bills coming though you might be a little shocked.

I don't let anyone tell me what I can eat drink etc. I do what I want

That is my point, we are getting to the point where the government will tell you what you can eat and drink. If schools can tell parents that their children are not allowed to bring packet lunches and have to have school meals then where would it end?

I don't have children but if I did I would be asking for the calorie count etc for school dinners that have been unhealthy and it has been uncovered....Jaime Oliver did something to make them healthy....until I believe that my child is eating healthy I will be sending them to school with a healthy packed lunch.

You would not have the choice! Some schools well be allowed to ban packed lunches. It is not like we live in a free country

Then I would send them to a school that allowed pack lunches I will not let anyone dictate to me what MY child could eat..."

So you think you will have a choice in which school your children go to? Often you find it is very difficult to get you child into the school you want, you are often just given the impression on freedom of choice.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *layfullsamMan
over a year ago

Solihull


"I'd say we have got a pretty good system...we could learn from countries like Denmark though..

So you do not mind other people telling you what you can eat, drink, read, watch etc? You my think I am being over the top and silly but if you look at some of the draft bills coming though you might be a little shocked.

I don't let anyone tell me what I can eat drink etc. I do what I want

That is my point, we are getting to the point where the government will tell you what you can eat and drink. If schools can tell parents that their children are not allowed to bring packet lunches and have to have school meals then where would it end?

I don't have children but if I did I would be asking for the calorie count etc for school dinners that have been unhealthy and it has been uncovered....Jaime Oliver did something to make them healthy....until I believe that my child is eating healthy I will be sending them to school with a healthy packed lunch.

You would not have the choice! Some schools well be allowed to ban packed lunches. It is not like we live in a free country

Then I would send them to a school that allowed pack lunches I will not let anyone dictate to me what MY child could eat..."

that would work because i guess you wouldn't pack a lunchbox containing 2 bags of crisps, tin of , mars bar and kit Kat and yes I've seen this

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atcherofmyballsMan
over a year ago

hereford


"I'd say we have got a pretty good system...we could learn from countries like Denmark though.."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *radleyandRavenCouple
over a year ago

Herts

I don't know how I feel about this... Some families can't afford to pay the fee for school lunches and I wouldn't exactly say school lunches are healthy (from what I've seen/remember). Nurseries seem to be ok but primary and secondary schools still seem to be burgers and chips...

I would sooner give my children packed lunches so that I know what they're eating, but having seen some children with nothing but cheese sandwiches, crisps, chocolate and fizzy drinks in their packed lunches (and one who brought in cold pizza) I can sort of understand it...

Lets face it, some parents just don't have a clue!

- Amy. x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aucy3Couple
over a year ago

glasgow

Britain is becoming a bit of a nanny state,soon they'll be tucking us into bed.

Having said that,nowhere's perfect,i like it here,it's better than most,and as good as the rest.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *isscheekychopsWoman
over a year ago

The land of grey peas and bacon


"I'd say we have got a pretty good system...we could learn from countries like Denmark though..

So you do not mind other people telling you what you can eat, drink, read, watch etc? You my think I am being over the top and silly but if you look at some of the draft bills coming though you might be a little shocked.

I don't let anyone tell me what I can eat drink etc. I do what I want

That is my point, we are getting to the point where the government will tell you what you can eat and drink. If schools can tell parents that their children are not allowed to bring packet lunches and have to have school meals then where would it end?

I don't have children but if I did I would be asking for the calorie count etc for school dinners that have been unhealthy and it has been uncovered....Jaime Oliver did something to make them healthy....until I believe that my child is eating healthy I will be sending them to school with a healthy packed lunch.

You would not have the choice! Some schools well be allowed to ban packed lunches. It is not like we live in a free country

Then I would send them to a school that allowed pack lunches I will not let anyone dictate to me what MY child could eat...

So you think you will have a choice in which school your children go to? Often you find it is very difficult to get you child into the school you want, you are often just given the impression on freedom of choice."

It's too hot to get into a debate about sending children to whatever school....I don't have kids so right now it does not effect me...and I think there will be a lot of people opposed to this including teachers etc

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Denmark- got strict immigration policy which is good however they are firm but fair...they have their own immigration issues with residents from Greenland.

Benefits- they don't allow you to sit on your arse for 20 years without having a job unless of course you can't work etc...they have a good pension system too...Housing they don't have social housing as such but have a low homeless rate..

Denmark is very green it uses more windmill thingy whatever they are called and it's cleaner then here..

I'm not knocking Demark,,,,But like many so called green counties Denmark has quite a productive hydro carbons industry that exports oil and gas to countries that are not so green ……

Lol they have good and bad...I am no means saying Denmark is this wonderful country it has it's issues...The same with Britain I like it here no major complaints apart from I need a pay rise lol."

I enjoyed my time working out of Esbjerg ,,,,,,

I still have quite a few “Told-Scats” copies in my filling system . ( Think that’s how Told-scats is spelt)

Nice place , nice people,,,,but not a cheap place to live though...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *isscheekychopsWoman
over a year ago

The land of grey peas and bacon


"Denmark- got strict immigration policy which is good however they are firm but fair...they have their own immigration issues with residents from Greenland.

Benefits- they don't allow you to sit on your arse for 20 years without having a job unless of course you can't work etc...they have a good pension system too...Housing they don't have social housing as such but have a low homeless rate..

Denmark is very green it uses more windmill thingy whatever they are called and it's cleaner then here..

I'm not knocking Demark,,,,But like many so called green counties Denmark has quite a productive hydro carbons industry that exports oil and gas to countries that are not so green ……

Lol they have good and bad...I am no means saying Denmark is this wonderful country it has it's issues...The same with Britain I like it here no major complaints apart from I need a pay rise lol.

I enjoyed my time working out of Esbjerg ,,,,,,

I still have quite a few “Told-Scats” copies in my filling system . ( Think that’s how Told-scats is spelt)

Nice place , nice people,,,,but not a cheap place to live though... "

I agree not a cheap place but the beer is good

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Denmark- got strict immigration policy which is good however they are firm but fair...they have their own immigration issues with residents from Greenland.

Benefits- they don't allow you to sit on your arse for 20 years without having a job unless of course you can't work etc...they have a good pension system too...Housing they don't have social housing as such but have a low homeless rate..

Denmark is very green it uses more windmill thingy whatever they are called and it's cleaner then here..

I'm not knocking Demark,,,,But like many so called green counties Denmark has quite a productive hydro carbons industry that exports oil and gas to countries that are not so green ……

Lol they have good and bad...I am no means saying Denmark is this wonderful country it has it's issues...The same with Britain I like it here no major complaints apart from I need a pay rise lol.

I enjoyed my time working out of Esbjerg ,,,,,,

I still have quite a few “Told-Scats” copies in my filling system . ( Think that’s how Told-scats is spelt)

Nice place , nice people,,,,but not a cheap place to live though...

I agree not a cheap place but the beer is good "

Yes, as I remember lovely beer,,,,,

Same can't be said for your hills and mountains though, which I'm sure you'd agree are a little bit thin on the ground lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *isscheekychopsWoman
over a year ago

The land of grey peas and bacon


"Denmark- got strict immigration policy which is good however they are firm but fair...they have their own immigration issues with residents from Greenland.

Benefits- they don't allow you to sit on your arse for 20 years without having a job unless of course you can't work etc...they have a good pension system too...Housing they don't have social housing as such but have a low homeless rate..

Denmark is very green it uses more windmill thingy whatever they are called and it's cleaner then here..

I'm not knocking Demark,,,,But like many so called green counties Denmark has quite a productive hydro carbons industry that exports oil and gas to countries that are not so green ……

Lol they have good and bad...I am no means saying Denmark is this wonderful country it has it's issues...The same with Britain I like it here no major complaints apart from I need a pay rise lol.

I enjoyed my time working out of Esbjerg ,,,,,,

I still have quite a few “Told-Scats” copies in my filling system . ( Think that’s how Told-scats is spelt)

Nice place , nice people,,,,but not a cheap place to live though...

I agree not a cheap place but the beer is good

Yes, as I remember lovely beer,,,,,

Same can't be said for your hills and mountains though, which I'm sure you'd agree are a little bit thin on the ground lol "

Flat as a pancake lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow

I think the problem stems from the fact there are too many people in 'made up' jobs determined to raise their profile (and appearance fees) by inventing some piece or other of nonsense about how people MUST do this or MUSTN'T do that.

There was a wifie on the telly earlier in the week who claimed to be a 'child sleep expert'.

WTF?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

School dinners aren't healthy at all. Mine had pizza, pasta and chocolate cake the other week. How is that meant to be healthy. Plus he says the food smells like rotten eggs. So has now gone back to packed lunch with a sandwich, yogurt, fruit, crisps and a snack bar thing. He is happy so am I because its half the price and I've got a choice over what he eats. If they ban packed lunches at his school I will pick him up for lunch and sit and have our lunch together. I'm not being dictated to about what my child will eat.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *isscheekychopsWoman
over a year ago

The land of grey peas and bacon

Funnily enough I was the only kid in my class that had a healthy packed lunch. mum hated school dinners and never allowed us to have them...my mum has always known what is healthy and what is not healthy but never deprived us...we would have a club bar on a Friday as a treat...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *un_JuiceCouple
over a year ago

Nr Chester

I cannot even begin to think where to start. People are blinkered, not even getting drawn into it. But to be blunt. No, we are not free. Never have been, it will get worse.

Nothing to do other than enjoy life as much as possible until the ruling elite have us struggling more and more until it's too late.

Agenda 21, Common Purpose. Social engineering. Much much more. Anyone wanting to shoot us down or ridicule fine. Enjoy the bubble of deception. We promised ourselves we wouldn't get drawn into serious and yes potential negative threads but alas we know where it's at. We are far from negative people this stuff isn't new but for sure recent false flag terror has done nothing but strip everyone ofmore rights and succeeded in us living in fear in a completely controlled nanny state.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atisfy janeWoman
over a year ago

Torquay

Compared to many other countries we do indeed live in a fairly 'Free' country.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *un_JuiceCouple
over a year ago

Nr Chester


"Compared to many other countries we do indeed live in a fairly 'Free' country.

"

Agreed until total global control, A new world order, once currency almost certainly governed by microchips implanted. Paranoid ? You'd better hope we are ! Wake up and look out for one another people x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atisfy janeWoman
over a year ago

Torquay


"Compared to many other countries we do indeed live in a fairly 'Free' country.

Agreed until total global control, A new world order, once currency almost certainly governed by microchips implanted. Paranoid ? You'd better hope we are ! Wake up and look out for one another people x"

Spat my coffee out when I got to the microchips bit.....thought I had heard it all.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lackshadow7Man
over a year ago

Toronto

The grass is always greener....etc etc

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Compared to many other countries we do indeed live in a fairly 'Free' country.

Agreed until total global control, A new world order, once currency almost certainly governed by microchips implanted. Paranoid ? You'd better hope we are ! Wake up and look out for one another people x

Spat my coffee out when I got to the microchips bit.....thought I had heard it all."

haha....me too

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

When my son was at school he took packed lunches everyday, there was always a long queue for school lunches and often running out of things or getting smaller portions. Personally I dont think theres anything wrong with a sandwiche, packet of crisps, chocolate bar and a drink, if he would have taken fruit then would have also given him that too. If the school had banned it then I would have still sent him in with it and faced the wrap, I mean what are they going to do??? Suspend pupils?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atisfy janeWoman
over a year ago

Torquay

I think they have a duty to tackle the 'compulsory' packet of crisps and chocolate bar habits of British parents in their children's packed lunches to be honest....

By going down the school dinner route, coupled with compulsory inspections of school kitchens as regards healthy menus then surely that is better than an unhealthy future generation?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aucy3Couple
over a year ago

glasgow


"Compared to many other countries we do indeed live in a fairly 'Free' country.

Agreed until total global control, A new world order, once currency almost certainly governed by microchips implanted. Paranoid ? You'd better hope we are ! Wake up and look out for one another people x"

Lol

It's all a lie,I've heard those microchips are no healthier than real chips pffftttt.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tomCom OP   Man
over a year ago

Wellingborough


"I think they have a duty to tackle the 'compulsory' packet of crisps and chocolate bar habits of British parents in their children's packed lunches to be honest....

By going down the school dinner route, coupled with compulsory inspections of school kitchens as regards healthy menus then surely that is better than an unhealthy future generation?"

If we live in a free country then is that not a personal choice? Who gives someone else the right to dictate what we can eat or drink. Their job is to give us the facts, it are job to make a choice, be that the wrong or right choice.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I think they have a duty to tackle the 'compulsory' packet of crisps and chocolate bar habits of British parents in their children's packed lunches to be honest....

By going down the school dinner route, coupled with compulsory inspections of school kitchens as regards healthy menus then surely that is better than an unhealthy future generation?"

I disagree, are the schools assuming that because the children are bringing " unhealthy" meals that they eat like that all the time? My son and alot of his friends all ate the same kind of things, they played out after school, they all still hang around together and not one of them are unhealthy, unfit or overweight.

I think this is just another way for schools to try and force things onto pupils and parents and make more money in the process.... I mean are these the same schools that make pupils wear blazers in very hot weather? they are only allowed to remove them when they are sat in class yet teachers are allowed to wear summer dresses!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Compared to many other countries we do indeed live in a fairly 'Free' country.

Agreed until total global control, A new world order, once currency almost certainly governed by microchips implanted. Paranoid ? You'd better hope we are ! Wake up and look out for one another people x

Lol

It's all a lie,I've heard those microchips are no healthier than real chips pffftttt. "

haha

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atisfy janeWoman
over a year ago

Torquay


"I think they have a duty to tackle the 'compulsory' packet of crisps and chocolate bar habits of British parents in their children's packed lunches to be honest....

By going down the school dinner route, coupled with compulsory inspections of school kitchens as regards healthy menus then surely that is better than an unhealthy future generation?

If we live in a free country then is that not a personal choice? Who gives someone else the right to dictate what we can eat or drink. Their job is to give us the facts, it are job to make a choice, be that the wrong or right choice."

I am frankly amazed that in this day and age anyone could argue the toss over the healthy well being and future of a child, so should we also use the 'Free Country' argument to stop children having dental check-ups if a parent feels it infringes their 'Freedom'?

Immunisation shots for kids?

What next?.....parents choice over whether or not their kids learn to read and write?

People rattle on about a 'Nanny State' but personally I think the well being of our children is paramount.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

OMG.... whatever next,,,,don't tell me they will start putting chlorine in the water.......

fook'in hell this country is becoming a dictatorship..... quick grab your children and take to the boats ..... we sail for the promised land at dawn......

Erm....does anyone know how to get there?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tomCom OP   Man
over a year ago

Wellingborough


"I think they have a duty to tackle the 'compulsory' packet of crisps and chocolate bar habits of British parents in their children's packed lunches to be honest....

By going down the school dinner route, coupled with compulsory inspections of school kitchens as regards healthy menus then surely that is better than an unhealthy future generation?

If we live in a free country then is that not a personal choice? Who gives someone else the right to dictate what we can eat or drink. Their job is to give us the facts, it are job to make a choice, be that the wrong or right choice.

I am frankly amazed that in this day and age anyone could argue the toss over the healthy well being and future of a child, so should we also use the 'Free Country' argument to stop children having dental check-ups if a parent feels it infringes their 'Freedom'?

Immunisation shots for kids?

What next?.....parents choice over whether or not their kids learn to read and write?

People rattle on about a 'Nanny State' but personally I think the well being of our children is paramount."

So we do not bring are children up the government do? So how does the government know what is good or bad for our children?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atisfy janeWoman
over a year ago

Torquay


"I think they have a duty to tackle the 'compulsory' packet of crisps and chocolate bar habits of British parents in their children's packed lunches to be honest....

By going down the school dinner route, coupled with compulsory inspections of school kitchens as regards healthy menus then surely that is better than an unhealthy future generation?

If we live in a free country then is that not a personal choice? Who gives someone else the right to dictate what we can eat or drink. Their job is to give us the facts, it are job to make a choice, be that the wrong or right choice.

I am frankly amazed that in this day and age anyone could argue the toss over the healthy well being and future of a child, so should we also use the 'Free Country' argument to stop children having dental check-ups if a parent feels it infringes their 'Freedom'?

Immunisation shots for kids?

What next?.....parents choice over whether or not their kids learn to read and write?

People rattle on about a 'Nanny State' but personally I think the well being of our children is paramount.

So we do not bring are children up the government do? So how does the government know what is good or bad for our children?

"

I give in.....if you don't understand the need for basic State child welfare then it's no good me trying to explain that need.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *layfullsamMan
over a year ago

Solihull


"I think they have a duty to tackle the 'compulsory' packet of crisps and chocolate bar habits of British parents in their children's packed lunches to be honest....

By going down the school dinner route, coupled with compulsory inspections of school kitchens as regards healthy menus then surely that is better than an unhealthy future generation?

If we live in a free country then is that not a personal choice? Who gives someone else the right to dictate what we can eat or drink. Their job is to give us the facts, it are job to make a choice, be that the wrong or right choice.

I am frankly amazed that in this day and age anyone could argue the toss over the healthy well being and future of a child, so should we also use the 'Free Country' argument to stop children having dental check-ups if a parent feels it infringes their 'Freedom'?

Immunisation shots for kids?

What next?.....parents choice over whether or not their kids learn to read and write?

People rattle on about a 'Nanny State' but personally I think the well being of our children is paramount.

So we do not bring are children up the government do? So how does the government know what is good or bad for our children?

"

think part of the problem is some and I mean some parents either don't know what's good and bad for there child and worse still they know but don't give a f..k

think its lazy parenting to shove a load of crisps, fizzy drinks and chocolate bars in a bag and call it a packed lunch

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

OP....I’m just curious to know in this ideal free society you crave,,,,,

Do you not think there should be some state guidance in place to protect vulnerable children, or do you feel that might impinge the rights of bad parents to treat their offspring in any way that they feel appropriate....?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tomCom OP   Man
over a year ago

Wellingborough


"OP....I’m just curious to know in this ideal free society you crave,,,,,

Do you not think there should be some state guidance in place to protect vulnerable children, or do you feel that might impinge the rights of bad parents to treat their offspring in any way that they feel appropriate....?

"

I agree in 'state guidance' but not 'state control'.

Next you will have to have tests and license to have children at this rate.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tomCom OP   Man
over a year ago

Wellingborough


"I think they have a duty to tackle the 'compulsory' packet of crisps and chocolate bar habits of British parents in their children's packed lunches to be honest....

By going down the school dinner route, coupled with compulsory inspections of school kitchens as regards healthy menus then surely that is better than an unhealthy future generation?

If we live in a free country then is that not a personal choice? Who gives someone else the right to dictate what we can eat or drink. Their job is to give us the facts, it are job to make a choice, be that the wrong or right choice.

I am frankly amazed that in this day and age anyone could argue the toss over the healthy well being and future of a child, so should we also use the 'Free Country' argument to stop children having dental check-ups if a parent feels it infringes their 'Freedom'?

Immunisation shots for kids?

What next?.....parents choice over whether or not their kids learn to read and write?

People rattle on about a 'Nanny State' but personally I think the well being of our children is paramount.

So we do not bring are children up the government do? So how does the government know what is good or bad for our children?

think part of the problem is some and I mean some parents either don't know what's good and bad for there child and worse still they know but don't give a f..k

think its lazy parenting to shove a load of crisps, fizzy drinks and chocolate bars in a bag and call it a packed lunch"

What did you and your friends have for your school lunch? Did it do you and them any harm?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"OP....I’m just curious to know in this ideal free society you crave,,,,,

Do you not think there should be some state guidance in place to protect vulnerable children, or do you feel that might impinge the rights of bad parents to treat their offspring in any way that they feel appropriate....?

I agree in 'state guidance' but not 'state control'.

Next you will have to have tests and license to have children at this rate."

So who decides whats guidance and whats control...... you?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tomCom OP   Man
over a year ago

Wellingborough


"OP....I’m just curious to know in this ideal free society you crave,,,,,

Do you not think there should be some state guidance in place to protect vulnerable children, or do you feel that might impinge the rights of bad parents to treat their offspring in any way that they feel appropriate....?

I agree in 'state guidance' but not 'state control'.

Next you will have to have tests and license to have children at this rate.

So who decides whats guidance and whats control...... you? "

Guidance and control are 2 different things. I can give you guidance on what books to read but I can not control what books you read.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *layfullsamMan
over a year ago

Solihull


"I think they have a duty to tackle the 'compulsory' packet of crisps and chocolate bar habits of British parents in their children's packed lunches to be honest....

By going down the school dinner route, coupled with compulsory inspections of school kitchens as regards healthy menus then surely that is better than an unhealthy future generation?

If we live in a free country then is that not a personal choice? Who gives someone else the right to dictate what we can eat or drink. Their job is to give us the facts, it are job to make a choice, be that the wrong or right choice.

I am frankly amazed that in this day and age anyone could argue the toss over the healthy well being and future of a child, so should we also use the 'Free Country' argument to stop children having dental check-ups if a parent feels it infringes their 'Freedom'?

Immunisation shots for kids?

What next?.....parents choice over whether or not their kids learn to read and write?

People rattle on about a 'Nanny State' but personally I think the well being of our children is paramount.

So we do not bring are children up the government do? So how does the government know what is good or bad for our children?

think part of the problem is some and I mean some parents either don't know what's good and bad for there child and worse still they know but don't give a f..k

think its lazy parenting to shove a load of crisps, fizzy drinks and chocolate bars in a bag and call it a packed lunch

What did you and your friends have for your school lunch? Did it do you and them any harm?"

sandwiches during the summer and hot meal at school during the winter,not crisps chocolate bars and fizzy drinks and nothing else

difference is that when I was at school we had a very active childhood both in school and out whereas a lot "not all" today live on ipods and would die if they had to do a cross country race etc

a friend who is a pe teacher says that the % of children who cant even see there toes let alone touch them is rising year on year

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow


"................

So who decides whats guidance and whats control...... you?

Guidance and control are 2 different things. I can give you guidance on what books to read but I can not control what books you read."

You can, or at least governments can, control what books are available to read.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *layfullsamMan
over a year ago

Solihull

go back to my original answer

Only if we go down the route of everyone having to have there own private medical insurance so parents can feed there kids crap and when they end up unhealthy there insurance pays for the hospital etc

that way everyone can do what they want. drink, smoke, eat crap do drugs etc but others don't have to pick up the bill

Only a thought

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"OP....I’m just curious to know in this ideal free society you crave,,,,,

Do you not think there should be some state guidance in place to protect vulnerable children, or do you feel that might impinge the rights of bad parents to treat their offspring in any way that they feel appropriate....?

I agree in 'state guidance' but not 'state control'.

Next you will have to have tests and license to have children at this rate.

So who decides whats guidance and whats control...... you?

Guidance and control are 2 different things. I can give you guidance on what books to read but I can not control what books you read."

So do you feel we should be governed by recommendation? and if so, on who’s recommendation should we trust to give us these recommendations? .....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

O o O oo

Many moons ago the school our children were in tried to do that very thing. Their school dinners at the time were awful so people sent packed lunches in.

When they said we couldn't do that I took them out of school for dinner then took them back.

I think at the time they wanted to dictate as they were not getting enough people paying for school dinners rather than they thought the packed lunches were not healthy enough though.

I think it doesn't hurt to educate people on healthy eating for their children, but I think it still should be down to choice rather than being told you have to.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

O o O oo

Oh and PS...because most parents did what we did they changed their mind and let packed lunches in again, plus changed their menu for the better.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

O o O oo

We used to have some stodge for school dinners when I was a kid.....but...we were more active outside of school then so burnt it off.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"We used to have some stodge for school dinners when I was a kid.....but...we were more active outside of school then so burnt it off."

I never stayed for school lunches so can’t really comment about what was available when I was a kid,,,,,,, but I certainly agree with Rugby that us kids seemed far more active back then….!.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *B9 QueenWoman
over a year ago

Over the rainbow, under the bridge

Depends on what you define as a free country. Many children bring food into school which is extremely unhealthy. And schools do have a duty of care.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atisfy janeWoman
over a year ago

Torquay

The problem is, as with many thread subjects aired on here, some people don't look into the WHOLE news story or study report....only the tabloid (like) headlines.

The study goes on to suggest free school lunches for ALL primary school children, with a menu that is carefully arranged with healthy and nutritious eating at it's core.

Is this government control?....or is it common sense, and an attempt to help future generations of our children?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ilandlarryCouple
over a year ago

more north lincs than mids!

My son gets a relatively healthy packed lunch for school. Always with a piece of fruit, brown bread and some squash instead of fizzy juice.

He wasn't allowed to take half a dozen dolly mixtures into school one day despite having mostly fruit in his box. But it's ok for the school to be serving a high sugar content pudding every day and expect the children to finish it.

Balanced diet ... my son eats a lot of fruit and veg at home and would much rather sit with a plateful of carrots and potatoes than anything else.

Not all parents are crap at feeding their children, and shouldn't be treated as idiots for choosing packed lunches. Unlike the idiot local to us who would send her child to school with nutella and smarties sandwiches!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I don't mind rules within reason. No country is free, no matter what you think. The only freedom we'll see is in unity where we live in a world of total equality.

Never gonna happen, I know. But a guy can dream.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

O o O oo


"The problem is, as with many thread subjects aired on here, some people don't look into the WHOLE news story or study report....only the tabloid (like) headlines.

The study goes on to suggest free school lunches for ALL primary school children, with a menu that is carefully arranged with healthy and nutritious eating at it's core.

Is this government control?....or is it common sense, and an attempt to help future generations of our children?

"

What if your child doesn't like the food on offer for that day or even for a few days a week, is it best to starve the child or give them a packed lunch?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow


"................

What if your child doesn't like the food on offer for that day or even for a few days a week, is it best to starve the child or give them a packed lunch?"

Children don't stay 'starved' for long and it's amazing how they come to like certain foods when there's no alternative.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

O o O oo


"................

What if your child doesn't like the food on offer for that day or even for a few days a week, is it best to starve the child or give them a packed lunch?

Children don't stay 'starved' for long and it's amazing how they come to like certain foods when there's no alternative."

Yeah right

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ilandlarryCouple
over a year ago

more north lincs than mids!


"................

What if your child doesn't like the food on offer for that day or even for a few days a week, is it best to starve the child or give them a packed lunch?

Children don't stay 'starved' for long and it's amazing how they come to like certain foods when there's no alternative."

Yeah ok! Cos sending them to school and willingly letting them have no lunch as they don't like it is going to do them so much good when it comes to concentrating etc.

I'd rather know my children are being properly fed, or food that I provide for them knowing that they will eat it.

How many days do you go to work and buy something that you don't actually like because if you do it often enough you will get used to it?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow


"................

What if your child doesn't like the food on offer for that day or even for a few days a week, is it best to starve the child or give them a packed lunch?

Children don't stay 'starved' for long and it's amazing how they come to like certain foods when there's no alternative.

Yeah right "

I accept not all kids will find not having their own way 100% easy to accept but maybe they just have to learn to do what they're told.

Who knows, it might come in handy should they ever grow up.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

O o O oo

I sometimes am in awe about how you twist everything that is said to suit yourself..... I will carry on with the relevance in my post

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"................

What if your child doesn't like the food on offer for that day or even for a few days a week, is it best to starve the child or give them a packed lunch?

Children don't stay 'starved' for long and it's amazing how they come to like certain foods when there's no alternative.

Yeah right

I accept not all kids will find not having their own way 100% easy to accept but maybe they just have to learn to do what they're told.

Who knows, it might come in handy should they ever grow up."

It's nothing about children having there own way. If someone doesn't like something they aren't going to eat it. My child ended up with plain rice and chocolate custard for lunch at school the other day because that is what was left as he doesn't like curry

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

O o O oo


"................

What if your child doesn't like the food on offer for that day or even for a few days a week, is it best to starve the child or give them a packed lunch?

Children don't stay 'starved' for long and it's amazing how they come to like certain foods when there's no alternative.

Yeah ok! Cos sending them to school and willingly letting them have no lunch as they don't like it is going to do them so much good when it comes to concentrating etc.

I'd rather know my children are being properly fed, or food that I provide for them knowing that they will eat it.

How many days do you go to work and buy something that you don't actually like because if you do it often enough you will get used to it?"

That was more or less my point....it is ok the goverment telling everyone what they should do, but wether people like it or not, not everything will be eaten and liked by every person.

so do we force feed children because the Goverment says they are to have it?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ilandlarryCouple
over a year ago

more north lincs than mids!

And before anyone says anything about trying new foods. My children do that at home, so that if they don't like it then there is always an alternative for them to have. They won't have that option in school.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow


"I sometimes am in awe about how you twist everything that is said to suit yourself..... I will carry on with the relevance in my post "

Other see it as cutting through the **** and not allowing folly or sentimentality to get in the way of doing the right thing.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow


"................

............

I accept not all kids will find not having their own way 100% easy to accept but maybe they just have to learn to do what they're told.

Who knows, it might come in handy should they ever grow up.

It's nothing about children having there own way. If someone doesn't like something they aren't going to eat it.

My child ended up with plain rice and chocolate custard for lunch at school the other day because that is what was left as he doesn't like curry"

I take it the child survived to tell the tale

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow


"And before anyone says anything about trying new foods. My children do that at home, so that if they don't like it then there is always an alternative for them to have. They won't have that option in school.

"

Maybe if there wasn't an alternative at home they'd get the message that the universe doesn't revolve around their fads.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aucy3Couple
over a year ago

glasgow


"................

What if your child doesn't like the food on offer for that day or even for a few days a week, is it best to starve the child or give them a packed lunch?

Children don't stay 'starved' for long and it's amazing how they come to like certain foods when there's no alternative.

Yeah right

I accept not all kids will find not having their own way 100% easy to accept but maybe they just have to learn to do what they're told.

Who knows, it might come in handy should they ever grow up."

Yep,we should beat them to within an inch of their life's,then when they're out cold,stuff as many Brussel sprouts down the ungrateful wee toe rags

throat as possible.

Alternatively we could starve them,

maybe 3 consecutive days a week.

Then the wee buggers will eat whatevers put in front of them and like it.

That'll teach them to do as they're told,then they can grow up to be well balanced,caring adults.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

O o O oo


"I sometimes am in awe about how you twist everything that is said to suit yourself..... I will carry on with the relevance in my post

Other see it as cutting through the **** and not allowing folly or sentimentality to get in the way of doing the right thing."

I am sure they do

For the purpose of my post....I asked a question to join into the debate, I didn't say what I would do.

If you want to force feed your children that is fine, I am sure they will admire you for not being too "sentimental" with them.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ilandlarryCouple
over a year ago

more north lincs than mids!


"And before anyone says anything about trying new foods. My children do that at home, so that if they don't like it then there is always an alternative for them to have. They won't have that option in school.

Maybe if there wasn't an alternative at home they'd get the message that the universe doesn't revolve around their fads."

I'm pretty sure that having likes and dislikes with food isn't a "fad".

There are things I just won't eat no matter how many times it is put in front of me, I wouldn't do the same to my children.

You still haven't answered my previous question either I see.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

my parents and grand parents grew up in a time where you could eat what you wanted without someone telling you its bad for you, drink what you wanted, smoke when and where you wanted, and my grand parents fought a war to stop someone from making the world do exactly what he wanted, and they turned out just fine, grand parents lived well into there 90's and parents are still fit and out going, back then it was a free country, now it is far from a free country.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

This was a study done by asking headmasters I believe. It's not government policy and will never happen. Most schools aren't able to cope with all children having a hot meal for lunch.

However parents don't always know best, any parents that screams loudest about how they know what's best for their kids is normally someone who's operating solely on emotion and not on logic or research. Food isn't just about obesity, it's about concentration levels and well being. Forget the lunch, what most of them have for breakfast (if at all) is the problem.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

O o O oo


"................

What if your child doesn't like the food on offer for that day or even for a few days a week, is it best to starve the child or give them a packed lunch?

Children don't stay 'starved' for long and it's amazing how they come to like certain foods when there's no alternative.

Yeah right

I accept not all kids will find not having their own way 100% easy to accept but maybe they just have to learn to do what they're told.

Who knows, it might come in handy should they ever grow up.

Yep,we should beat them to within an inch of their life's,then when they're out cold,stuff as many Brussel sprouts down the ungrateful wee toe rags

throat as possible.

Alternatively we could starve them,

maybe 3 consecutive days a week.

Then the wee buggers will eat whatevers put in front of them and like it.

That'll teach them to do as they're told,then they can grow up to be well balanced,caring adults.

"

Well there is one thing though Saucy, they would probably leave home very early and not go back to visit the tyrants who force fed or starved them....

I hate sprouts.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"my parents and grand parents grew up in a time where you could eat what you wanted without someone telling you its bad for you, drink what you wanted, smoke when and where you wanted, and my grand parents fought a war to stop someone from making the world do exactly what he wanted, and they turned out just fine, grand parents lived well into there 90's and parents are still fit and out going, back then it was a free country, now it is far from a free country."

That's hilarious. Britain was far less free

Homosexuality was illegal

There was a ministry of information

People did not question things

Wives stayed at home and didn't work

Pornography was illegal

The government had far more control of the news media

Pubs closed at 2 and then 11 to control drinking

Sterling was a blocked currency

There was no FOI Act

Smoking causes cancer and kills millions every year globally

Let's not forget scurvy, rickets etc

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aucy3Couple
over a year ago

glasgow


"................

What if your child doesn't like the food on offer for that day or even for a few days a week, is it best to starve the child or give them a packed lunch?

Children don't stay 'starved' for long and it's amazing how they come to like certain foods when there's no alternative.

Yeah right

I accept not all kids will find not having their own way 100% easy to accept but maybe they just have to learn to do what they're told.

Who knows, it might come in handy should they ever grow up.

Yep,we should beat them to within an inch of their life's,then when they're out cold,stuff as many Brussel sprouts down the ungrateful wee toe rags

throat as possible.

Alternatively we could starve them,

maybe 3 consecutive days a week.

Then the wee buggers will eat whatevers put in front of them and like it.

That'll teach them to do as they're told,then they can grow up to be well balanced,caring adults.

Well there is one thing though Saucy, they would probably leave home very early and not go back to visit the tyrants who force fed or starved them....

I hate sprouts. "

Well rid I say grrrrrrrrr

I could put you over my knee,and spank you till you liked those sprouts,all for your own good of course.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

O o O oo

The OH has already tried that Saucy and it didn't work...but if you think it might work for you I am game.

Shall I wear the stockings like the OH likes me to?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow


"And before anyone says anything about trying new foods. My children do that at home, so that if they don't like it then there is always an alternative for them to have. They won't have that option in school.

Maybe if there wasn't an alternative at home they'd get the message that the universe doesn't revolve around their fads.

I'm pretty sure that having likes and dislikes with food isn't a "fad".

There are things I just won't eat no matter how many times it is put in front of me, I wouldn't do the same to my children.

You still haven't answered my previous question either I see."

This one?


".............

How many days do you go to work and buy something that you don't actually like because if you do it often enough you will get used to it?"

Sorry, I took that to be a rhetorical question.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I have to ask this, as it seem each day there seems to be something new people want to stop us doing.

Today it is children should not be allowed to take packet lunches as they are often not healthy.

If we live in a free country should we be allowed to do what we want, as long as it does not harm others?"

at my daughters school you can't send in unhealthy lunches.. it's water only for drinks etc

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *layfullsamMan
over a year ago

Solihull


"Denmark- got strict immigration policy which is good however they are firm but fair...they have their own immigration issues with residents from Greenland.

Benefits- they don't allow you to sit on your arse for 20 years without having a job unless of course you can't work etc...they have a good pension system too...Housing they don't have social housing as such but have a low homeless rate..

Denmark is very green it uses more windmill thingy whatever they are called and it's cleaner then here..

and the girls are gorgeous

Yeah,,,, but Sam .... with the population of Denmark only being about five and a half million,,,, your chances of pulling over there aint looking all that good mate... "

awww ffs why does someone always have to spoil my day with reality

ps I pulled in Sweden once

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow


"I have to ask this, as it seem each day there seems to be something new people want to stop us doing.

Today it is children should not be allowed to take packet lunches as they are often not healthy.

If we live in a free country should we be allowed to do what we want, as long as it does not harm others?

at my daughters school you can't send in unhealthy lunches.. it's water only for drinks etc"

Why would you send a child to school with an 'unhealthy' lunch?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I agree the correct balance of nutrition is vitally important, but I’m unable to give a considered opinion of the eating habits of a nations children who are lucky enough to live in a county where they have the choice to decline food…..

But I do think children in this country deserve the respect of being given an option to help decide what food makes them feel satisfied and therefore more attentive for at least one meal a day, and if that means having a packet lunch I’m all for it….

I’m not against the powers that be, helping educate parents and children into make better choices by offering healthy options during the mandatory provision of set school meal menus…….

To me that’s living with free choice in a free country….

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ilandlarryCouple
over a year ago

more north lincs than mids!


"I agree the correct balance of nutrition is vitally important, but I’m unable to give a considered opinion of the eating habits of a nations children who are lucky enough to live in a county where they have the choice to decline food…..

But I do think children in this country deserve the respect of being given an option to help decide what food makes them feel satisfied and therefore more attentive for at least one meal a day, and if that means having a packet lunch I’m all for it….

I’m not against the powers that be, helping educate parents and children into make better choices by offering healthy options during the mandatory provision of set school meal menus…….

To me that’s living with free choice in a free country….

"

education for parents regarding what is acceptable to send in your children's packed lunch box. Seems a more fairer solution IMO. I'm not adverse to getting ideas about what to feed mine especially the more picky one!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Only if we go down the route of everyone having to have there own private medical insurance so parents can feed there kids crap and when they end up unhealthy there insurance pays for the hospital etc

that way everyone can do what they want drink smoke do drugs etc but others don't have to pick up the bill

Only a thought "

Good analysis, I never thought of it that way, Thanks.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow


"

education for parents regarding what is acceptable to send in your children's packed lunch box. Seems a more fairer solution IMO. I'm not adverse to getting ideas about what to feed mine especially the more picky one!"

Agreed. It'd be good to have affordable ideas of what'd be good stuff for a kid's lunch. No compulsion - just suggestions based on 'healthy'.

Then the parent packs the lunchbox with that stuff and the kid eats it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The problem is that even "educating" parents will be seen by some as a nanny state. The diet of most adults is pretty poor and asking them to decide what's healthy for their children is a bit of a tall order!

You'll still get the "did me no harm" brigade (often missing all their teeth with a fag hanging out of their mouth)

Is it a good solution? Probably but is it realistic? Probably not.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Why would you send a child to school with an 'unhealthy' lunch?"

depends what you call unhealthy. As long as it's in moderation it should be okay. But nothing but water is a bit far..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hoenixcouplexxCouple
over a year ago

Leicestershire

See the problem we have with this is we give our kids packed lunches and we like to keep them varied and as healthy as we can. We do actually care about what our kids eat and their health!

However when you ban packed lunches the choice goes to the child unless the school only provide one healthy option for lunch on the £1 a head they've budgeted for. Which means given the option a 5 year old and a 9 year old are going to choose chips and ready made crap every time. Especially those that have an un-healthy diet at home because that's all they know!

So unless *only* healthy food is available all they will achieve is changing the diet of those that already eat healthy!

And if I am honest it really really pisses me off that someone else is dictating what my kids eat at school.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"................

............

I accept not all kids will find not having their own way 100% easy to accept but maybe they just have to learn to do what they're told.

Who knows, it might come in handy should they ever grow up.

It's nothing about children having there own way. If someone doesn't like something they aren't going to eat it.

My child ended up with plain rice and chocolate custard for lunch at school the other day because that is what was left as he doesn't like curry

I take it the child survived to tell the tale"

Yes he did survive but was hungry all afternoon and then wanted something to eat soon as he got in rather than waiting till meal time. Plus it's not a nutritional meal

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"my parents and grand parents grew up in a time where you could eat what you wanted without someone telling you its bad for you, drink what you wanted, smoke when and where you wanted, and my grand parents fought a war to stop someone from making the world do exactly what he wanted, and they turned out just fine, grand parents lived well into there 90's and parents are still fit and out going, back then it was a free country, now it is far from a free country.

That's hilarious. Britain was far less free

Homosexuality was illegal

There was a ministry of information

People did not question things

Wives stayed at home and didn't work

Pornography was illegal

The government had far more control of the news media

Pubs closed at 2 and then 11 to control drinking

Sterling was a blocked currency

There was no FOI Act

Smoking causes cancer and kills millions every year globally

Let's not forget scurvy, rickets etc"

absolute tosh im sorry but yeah some points are valid, smoking does cause cancer, but so does many other things, there wasnt write ups in the papers telling you what to eat and what not to eat, people did ask questions (the miners strikes, among countless other strikes) what happens now, basically you do what your told or you are out if a job, pornography is still illegal, homosexuality wasnt illegal but gay marriage was, today we live in a constantly watched over governed over taxed unfree country, back then it wasnt totally free by any means but it was alot more free than today.

oh and by the way it never did my grandparents or parents any harm and my parents dont walk around with teeth missing and fags hanging out of there mouth.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow


"

Why would you send a child to school with an 'unhealthy' lunch?

depends what you call unhealthy. As long as it's in moderation it should be okay. But nothing but water is a bit far.. "

Haud the bus. YOU'RE the one who called it unhealthy.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow


"................

............

I accept not all kids will find not having their own way 100% easy to accept but maybe they just have to learn to do what they're told.

Who knows, it might come in handy should they ever grow up.

It's nothing about children having there own way. If someone doesn't like something they aren't going to eat it.

My child ended up with plain rice and chocolate custard for lunch at school the other day because that is what was left as he doesn't like curry

I take it the child survived to tell the tale

Yes he did survive but was hungry all afternoon and then wanted something to eat soon as he got in rather than waiting till meal time. Plus it's not a nutritional meal "

Hungry ALL afternoon? Poor child. I'm astonished the child cruelty people haven't had you jailed for neglect

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Why would you send a child to school with an 'unhealthy' lunch?

depends what you call unhealthy. As long as it's in moderation it should be okay. But nothing but water is a bit far..

Haud the bus. YOU'RE the one who called it unhealthy."

since when is juice unhealthy... But not allowed it..or yogurts.. or any chocolate or biscuit at all..if they had lots of healthy food, one biscuit wouldn't hurt... But it's banned. .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow

A moment on the lips .............

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"A moment on the lips ............."

Everything in moderation

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"my parents and grand parents grew up in a time where you could eat what you wanted without someone telling you its bad for you, drink what you wanted, smoke when and where you wanted, and my grand parents fought a war to stop someone from making the world do exactly what he wanted, and they turned out just fine, grand parents lived well into there 90's and parents are still fit and out going, back then it was a free country, now it is far from a free country.

That's hilarious. Britain was far less free

Homosexuality was illegal

There was a ministry of information

People did not question things

Wives stayed at home and didn't work

Pornography was illegal

The government had far more control of the news media

Pubs closed at 2 and then 11 to control drinking

Sterling was a blocked currency

There was no FOI Act

Smoking causes cancer and kills millions every year globally

Let's not forget scurvy, rickets etc

absolute tosh im sorry but yeah some points are valid, smoking does cause cancer, but so does many other things, there wasnt write ups in the papers telling you what to eat and what not to eat, people did ask questions (the miners strikes, among countless other strikes) what happens now, basically you do what your told or you are out if a job, pornography is still illegal, homosexuality wasnt illegal but gay marriage was, today we live in a constantly watched over governed over taxed unfree country, back then it wasnt totally free by any means but it was alot more free than today.

oh and by the way it never did my grandparents or parents any harm and my parents dont walk around with teeth missing and fags hanging out of there mouth."

Actually pornography is legal

Gay relations are legal

Freedom of information act allows us to know far more than we ever did

Propaganda was HUGE in this country for decades.

Government told us fuck all in the 50's60's70's about what they were up to and only recently can we gain access to this information.

Your rose tinted spectacles may appear to apply freedom to this period but if you were black,female,gay,Irish or catholic you'd not say the same at all.

As for "absolute tosh" I suspect your knowledge of British history may not be that great.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

no we dont live in a free country, another stupid idea. telling people how they should live their lives.

when i was a kid i would eat anything these days for some reason kids are fussy, my son has been a fussy eater since he was a baby, he would refuse to eat food he didnt like, never had a weight problem though.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"my parents and grand parents grew up in a time where you could eat what you wanted without someone telling you its bad for you, drink what you wanted, smoke when and where you wanted, and my grand parents fought a war to stop someone from making the world do exactly what he wanted, and they turned out just fine, grand parents lived well into there 90's and parents are still fit and out going, back then it was a free country, now it is far from a free country.

That's hilarious. Britain was far less free

Homosexuality was illegal

There was a ministry of information

People did not question things

Wives stayed at home and didn't work

Pornography was illegal

The government had far more control of the news media

Pubs closed at 2 and then 11 to control drinking

Sterling was a blocked currency

There was no FOI Act

Smoking causes cancer and kills millions every year globally

Let's not forget scurvy, rickets etc

absolute tosh im sorry but yeah some points are valid, smoking does cause cancer, but so does many other things, there wasnt write ups in the papers telling you what to eat and what not to eat, people did ask questions (the miners strikes, among countless other strikes) what happens now, basically you do what your told or you are out if a job, pornography is still illegal, homosexuality wasnt illegal but gay marriage was, today we live in a constantly watched over governed over taxed unfree country, back then it wasnt totally free by any means but it was alot more free than today.

oh and by the way it never did my grandparents or parents any harm and my parents dont walk around with teeth missing and fags hanging out of there mouth.

Actually pornography is legal

Gay relations are legal

Freedom of information act allows us to know far more than we ever did

Propaganda was HUGE in this country for decades.

Government told us fuck all in the 50's60's70's about what they were up to and only recently can we gain access to this information.

Your rose tinted spectacles may appear to apply freedom to this period but if you were black,female,gay,Irish or catholic you'd not say the same at all.

As for "absolute tosh" I suspect your knowledge of British history may not be that great.

"

i said gay marriage was illegal but been gay wasnt, hardcore pornography is illegal, i am female so were 2 of my grandparents and my mother and im actually a history teacher lol so my grasp of history must be upto a decent level.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

You teach history yet you are unaware that pornography is actually legal and has been for some time. You also seem to be unaware of some of the legislation in existence right up to the 1970's that infringed on liberties quite regularly. The Equalities act on its way through parliament at this moment is another removal of a restriction. Also newspapers telling us what to do is not infringing on my liberty in any way shape or form. This story is the reporting of research. Which as an academic you will obviously be aware isn't a law or indeed even guidance. Also as a history teacher I'm sure you'll also be fully aware that government guidance isn't legally binding and therefore not a restriction of freedom (unlike say licensing hours or Sunday trading). This story is yet another storm about nothing. Nothing is banned, nothing is restricted due to this report and no ones freedoms have been infringed on.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tomCom OP   Man
over a year ago

Wellingborough


"You teach history yet you are unaware that pornography is actually legal and has been for some time. You also seem to be unaware of some of the legislation in existence right up to the 1970's that infringed on liberties quite regularly. The Equalities act on its way through parliament at this moment is another removal of a restriction. Also newspapers telling us what to do is not infringing on my liberty in any way shape or form. This story is the reporting of research. Which as an academic you will obviously be aware isn't a law or indeed even guidance. Also as a history teacher I'm sure you'll also be fully aware that government guidance isn't legally binding and therefore not a restriction of freedom (unlike say licensing hours or Sunday trading). This story is yet another storm about nothing. Nothing is banned, nothing is restricted due to this report and no ones freedoms have been infringed on."

I see you did not read my original post. I said they 'want to'. I did not say they 'have' or even they 'are'

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I was responding to the person who was saying we have less freedom based on your original statement. Your OP didn't say they were going to, but then you don't clarify who "they" are. It was a report commissioned by the government but isn't a policy statement. Mr Gove has said he'd like to see "more" school dinners so that's not exactly a restriction of freedom either.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I see you did not read my original post. I said they 'want to'. I did not say they 'have' or even they 'are'"

Hey but at least your thread got people talking about the issue ,,,, much in the same way as whatever caused you to notice the issue in the first place then got you to talk about it on here……..

Hey isn't that like a really clever marketing ploy to raise awareness as little cost ...

Coz if it is,,,,gawd bless them people in powers for their uncanny ability to pull our strings and yank out chains….!.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I see you did not read my original post. I said they 'want to'. I did not say they 'have' or even they 'are'

Hey but at least your thread got people talking about the issue ,,,, much in the same way as whatever caused you to notice the issue in the first place then got you to talk about it on here……..

Hey isn't that like a really clever marketing ploy to raise awareness as little cost ...

Coz if it is,,,,gawd bless them people in powers for their uncanny ability to pull our strings and yank out chains….!."

Also if by the 100th post people even remember what the original discussion is about I'd be amazed!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I see you did not read my original post. I said they 'want to'. I did not say they 'have' or even they 'are'

Hey but at least your thread got people talking about the issue ,,,, much in the same way as whatever caused you to notice the issue in the first place then got you to talk about it on here……..

Hey isn't that like a really clever marketing ploy to raise awareness as little cost ...

Coz if it is,,,,gawd bless them people in powers for their uncanny ability to pull our strings and yank out chains….!.

Also if by the 100th post people even remember what the original discussion is about I'd be amazed! "

It would be nice to think that having followed this thread someone somewhere might have perhaps changed their thoughts or at least considered another way of looking at things on a number of potential issues......

Healthy debate and enthusiastic thought exchange make for interesting reading when people remain civil to one another,,,

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ighland_RoseCouple
over a year ago

Brigadoon


"my parents and grand parents grew up in a time where you could eat what you wanted without someone telling you its bad for you, drink what you wanted, smoke when and where you wanted, and my grand parents fought a war to stop someone from making the world do exactly what he wanted, and they turned out just fine, grand parents lived well into there 90's and parents are still fit and out going, back then it was a free country, now it is far from a free country.

That's hilarious. Britain was far less free

Homosexuality was illegal

There was a ministry of information

People did not question things

Wives stayed at home and didn't work

Pornography was illegal

The government had far more control of the news media

Pubs closed at 2 and then 11 to control drinking

Sterling was a blocked currency

There was no FOI Act

Smoking causes cancer and kills millions every year globally

Let's not forget scurvy, rickets etc

absolute tosh im sorry but yeah some points are valid, smoking does cause cancer, but so does many other things, there wasnt write ups in the papers telling you what to eat and what not to eat, people did ask questions (the miners strikes, among countless other strikes) what happens now, basically you do what your told or you are out if a job, pornography is still illegal, homosexuality wasnt illegal but gay marriage was, today we live in a constantly watched over governed over taxed unfree country, back then it wasnt totally free by any means but it was alot more free than today.

oh and by the way it never did my grandparents or parents any harm and my parents dont walk around with teeth missing and fags hanging out of there mouth.

Actually pornography is legal

Gay relations are legal

Freedom of information act allows us to know far more than we ever did

Propaganda was HUGE in this country for decades.

Government told us fuck all in the 50's60's70's about what they were up to and only recently can we gain access to this information.

Your rose tinted spectacles may appear to apply freedom to this period but if you were black,female,gay,Irish or catholic you'd not say the same at all.

As for "absolute tosh" I suspect your knowledge of British history may not be that great.

i said gay marriage was illegal but been gay wasnt, hardcore pornography is illegal, i am female so were 2 of my grandparents and my mother and im actually a history teacher lol so my grasp of history must be upto a decent level."

Homosexuality was illegal until 1967 in England and Wales, 1980 in Scotland and 1982 in Ireland.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ighland_RoseCouple
over a year ago

Brigadoon


"I have to ask this, as it seem each day there seems to be something new people want to stop us doing.

Today it is children should not be allowed to take packet lunches as they are often not healthy.

If we live in a free country should we be allowed to do what we want, as long as it does not harm others?"

To take issue with the original post you stated "If we live in a free country should we be allowed to do what we want, as long as it does not harm others?" Well parents that send their children to school with unhealthy lunches (and most likely feed them unhealthily at home) are harming others.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

im bowing out of this post, dont want to argue with people, there have been valid points either way and i have said my piece, so im going to leave it there.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"no we dont live in a free country, another stupid idea. telling people how they should live their lives.

."

The thing is, no one is telling us to do this. It's based on a study of schools and food intake and quality of intake. The suggestion by the study group is to get more people to eat school dinners. It's not the law and never will be. I think sometimes when research is done and that research makes recommendations people assume they're being told they "have to" follow it. Papers don't tell us what to do, researches don't tell is what to do, doctors don't tell us what to do, they all make suggestions or recommendations. Even Gove who's clearly a nut job has said that he will encourage more free school meals, better quality of food to encourage people to eat better at school.

For all of us here who send kids into school with a healthy meal there are an equal number who send kids into school with shit food. Their freedom of choice puts their kids at a disadvantage. Research shows that a child with a healthy diet is more likely to be able to concentrate for a longer period. The research doesn't say you have to just that it's best to do so.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"my parents and grand parents grew up in a time where you could eat what you wanted without someone telling you its bad for you, drink what you wanted, smoke when and where you wanted, and my grand parents fought a war to stop someone from making the world do exactly what he wanted, and they turned out just fine, grand parents lived well into there 90's and parents are still fit and out going, back then it was a free country, now it is far from a free country."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top