FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

It's a violation of Human Rights

Jump to newest
 

By *hyllyphylly OP   Man
over a year ago

Bradford

Locking up some of Britain's most notorious killers for life without any prospect of release is a breach of their human rights, European judges have ruled.

This is just stupid

Here's the story... http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23245254

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Locking up some of Britain's most notorious killers for life without any prospect of release is a breach of their human rights, European judges have ruled.

This is just stupid

Here's the story... http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23245254"

too fucking right ....let the bastards rot......

in fack kill the cunt...what harm did the inosent people do to them..

fuck all

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *abioMan
over a year ago

Newcastle and Gateshead

[Removed by poster at 09/07/13 23:16:37]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Its the 'without prospect of release' part that they have said is wrong! It DOESN'T mean they will get released. It just means means a review has to be taken for parole purposes.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *abioMan
over a year ago

Newcastle and Gateshead


"Locking up some of Britain's most notorious killers for life without any prospect of release is a breach of their human rights, European judges have ruled.

This is just stupid

Here's the story... http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23245254"

I have no issue with the ruling for two reasons....

full life sentence's are one not given out by judges, but by politians (the home secretary)

at no point did they say you couldn't lock people up for life, just that you can't give them no chance of getting out....

so you could do what they do in norway for example... and have parole hearings every 10 years after the term of the sentence....

or you could have a hearing after 50 years if you wanted to... and keep them in.....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Locking up some of Britain's most notorious killers for life without any prospect of release is a breach of their human rights, European judges have ruled.

This is just stupid

Here's the story... http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23245254"

Its a difficult one as some people repent, others would be a menace if released and more would be butchered by the public if it became known who they are. We had people on here the other day saying Brady shouldn't be allowed to move to jail so he could starve himself to death so go figure. I think each case should be assessed individually and maybe their should be some changes but not to many. After all who would want a mass murderer released into your local old folks care home.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ce WingerMan
over a year ago

P.O. Box DE1 0NQ

In 1972, twenty year old Palma de Mallorca was demanded to three hundred eighty four thousand nine hundred and twelve years of sentence for having failed to deliver letters. His crime of not delivering over four thousand letters resulted in such a huge punishment by the Spanish judiciary. This remains the longest sentence demanded so far in history.

A tad harsh methinks

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Locking up some of Britain's most notorious killers for life without any prospect of release is a breach of their human rights, European judges have ruled.

This is just stupid

Here's the story... http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23245254

Its a difficult one as some people repent, others would be a menace if released and more would be butchered by the public if it became known who they are. We had people on here the other day saying Brady shouldn't be allowed to move to jail so he could starve himself to death so go figure. I think each case should be assessed individually and maybe their should be some changes but not to many. After all who would want a mass murderer released into your local old folks care home. "

Yeah. But think of the money saved in fares to Switzerland!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow


"In 1972, twenty year old Palma de Mallorca was demanded to three hundred eighty four thousand nine hundred and twelve years of sentence for having failed to deliver letters. His crime of not delivering over four thousand letters resulted in such a huge punishment by the Spanish judiciary. This remains the longest sentence demanded so far in history.

A tad harsh methinks "

Franco at his best. Jealous of Adolf's success with the trains.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lyce and Mister MCouple
over a year ago

Falkirk

I certainly don't think they were thinking of the victims human rights when they were murdering them

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Let them all out. Just to a nice welcome committee of baying relatives. See how long they want to stay out for

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top