FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Social media ban for under 16s

Jump to newest
 

By *erdyHolly OP   TV/TS
1 day ago

In a galaxy far far away

Has just been announced.

Is it a good thing or a bit extreme?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ocialablechapMan
1 day ago

Paphos and also SW UK

Good thing.

Everyone should watch the c4 2 part documentary by Emma Willis and husband to understand.

Yes some kids will get round this, but not all.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *parkle1974Woman
1 day ago

Leeds

I think it's a good thing though the youth of today will find a way around it x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ysteriousGirlOGWoman
1 day ago

Manchester

Its a good thing, children don't need access to toxic or dangerous things. They don't need their minds filled with unrealistic expectations and beauty standards. They don't need to be exposed to bullying at home when they can escape it after school.

I'm grateful I was the generation of actually being a kid. Yes we had MSN and Bebo but it didn't control our lives like it does today.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ympho6969Woman
1 day ago

glasgow

I think its a hit extreme but I do understand why at the same time.

Cyber bullying has become a huge thing and its very easy to make anon accounts to do it. Kids can be some of the cruelest out there.

Thats not even taking into account the risk to kids from adults...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ananabrumMan
1 day ago

castle bromwich

It's a bad thing, ther's already plenty of parental controls and features in place to restrict and monitor access. Parents are too lazy to invest the time to learn about and implement these features. Parents need to start taking some bloody responisibility

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *amjones566Man
1 day ago

Pembrokeshire

The only thing i was hooked on was marketplace when I was younger..my parents never knew what I was bringing home next

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *partharmonyCouple
1 day ago

Tonbridge

There really should be education in schools about dealing with the online world. Maybe there is, I don't know.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oxy-RedWoman
1 day ago

pink panther territory


"It's a bad thing, ther's already plenty of parental controls and features in place to restrict and monitor access. Parents are too lazy to invest the time to learn about and implement these features. Parents need to start taking some bloody responisibility"

I take it your a parent?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oxy-RedWoman
1 day ago

pink panther territory

It's a good thing in my opinion

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ananabrumMan
1 day ago

castle bromwich


"It's a bad thing, ther's already plenty of parental controls and features in place to restrict and monitor access. Parents are too lazy to invest the time to learn about and implement these features. Parents need to start taking some bloody responisibility

I take it your a parent?"

No im not and i don't need to be. I work in IT and Ive got a lot of neices and nephews

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arkbaneMan
1 day ago

East leeds

Definitely a good thing

Too buried in phone...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *k_123Man
1 day ago

.

Prob should have brought some age restrictions on VPN use too. Apparently that’s how most Australian kids get around the ban. It’s certainly how people get around the porn site restrictions in the uk.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oxy-RedWoman
1 day ago

pink panther territory


"It's a bad thing, ther's already plenty of parental controls and features in place to restrict and monitor access. Parents are too lazy to invest the time to learn about and implement these features. Parents need to start taking some bloody responisibility

I take it your a parent?

No im not and i don't need to be. I work in IT and Ive got a lot of neices and nephews"

Then you really shouldn't tell parents to take some responsibility as you really don't have a clue about parenting

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ora the explorerWoman
1 day ago

Paradise, Herts


"It's a bad thing, ther's already plenty of parental controls and features in place to restrict and monitor access. Parents are too lazy to invest the time to learn about and implement these features. Parents need to start taking some bloody responisibility

I take it your a parent?

No im not and i don't need to be. I work in IT and Ive got a lot of neices and nephews"

🤣🤣. Opinion not even valid then. You don’t have kids 🤷‍♀️

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ora the explorerWoman
1 day ago

Paradise, Herts

Absolutely a good thing.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arialoueWoman
1 day ago

Doncaster

I think Ai should be banned next to help stop fake content

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *erdyHolly OP   TV/TS
1 day ago

In a galaxy far far away


"Prob should have brought some age restrictions on VPN use too. Apparently that’s how most Australian kids get around the ban. It’s certainly how people get around the porn site restrictions in the uk. "

That's the problem with it. I don't know how effective this will be because of VPNs

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oxy-RedWoman
1 day ago

pink panther territory


"I think Ai should be banned next to help stop fake content "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arialoueWoman
1 day ago

Doncaster

I think it's time to let kids do kids stuff rather than having constant access to stuff they shouldn't , what's wrong with going back to not having access to everything 24/7

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *onin25Man
1 day ago

Durham

I think it's definitely a good thing. Social media is addictive as well as potentially harmful, do we really want to allow our children to have access to something addictive and harmful?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *elloIntrigueMan
1 day ago

North West UK

It's definitely an interesting call. I find myself agreeing but also there are some safeguards already there so I think digital sessions teaching parents the parental controls that are already in place would be useful too.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uaveNightsMan
1 day ago

Canvey Island

I’m on the fence with this. Kids will find a way around this without having to use a VPN & can bypass security measures easily, short of an outright phone lockdown.

The flip side to this, social media companies had a very lax approach to moderating content on its platform and dealing with reports, it’s been a well known problem that they just shrug off reports.

It’s a tricky act to balance here.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rBlueEyes35Man
1 day ago

Alloa

This is definitely a hot topic and the pros and cons will rage through time endlessly.

If I was a teen now id be outraged at losing my escapism online and id find ways around any cloaking ban. I was so grateful to get home from school and escape onto MySpace and Yahoo games away from the horrible real world environment I faced.

However. As an adult and given how nasty and damaging the online world can be these days, if its implemented correctly and without too many indecisive actions then perhaps it could benefit our youth.

The other issue is, kids today have never known anything other than tech, theyre always connected, always online, most things accessible at the click of the button. When thats removed, how will they react? How will they function? You'll end up with all sorts of new issues arriving as a result of this.. perhaps ill be proved wrong in time

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ananabrumMan
1 day ago

castle bromwich

Ah the age old argument you cant say this if you havent done that. Its a load of bollocks and dosn't hold any water.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *elloIntrigueMan
1 day ago

North West UK


"It's definitely an interesting call. I find myself agreeing but also there are some safeguards already there so I think digital sessions teaching parents the parental controls that are already in place would be useful too."

I think this does show that we are always a step behind the technology and government will and want can be slow but can also move pretty quickly.

As someone that was physically and mentally bullied as a kid, I really detest the thought of a child getting that abuse potentially when using their own computer / phone / gaming device.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
1 day ago

in Lancashire

If it forces big tech (who have been slow in some areas) to address some of the issues which are within their control then yes it will be positive..

Interested to see how other countries respond in the future as many I think are also looking at having to legislate post Australia's decision and now this..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uriousKouplingCouple
1 day ago

Rushden

A bit extreme... It needs control more than a ban. Digital is where we're heading

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uriousKouplingCouple
1 day ago

Rushden


"It's a bad thing, ther's already plenty of parental controls and features in place to restrict and monitor access. Parents are too lazy to invest the time to learn about and implement these features. Parents need to start taking some bloody responisibility"

Totally agree 💯

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mf123Man
1 day ago

with one foot out the door

I hate social media crap but all the limitations of internet use in this country is starting to look very north korean you cant but a fart back into an arse hole

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *erdyHolly OP   TV/TS
1 day ago

In a galaxy far far away

Does this mean there will be forced age checks for us adults to use the likes of YouTube, Facebook, Twitter etc

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oudoir-EroticaCouple
1 day ago

Bolton


"It's a bad thing, ther's already plenty of parental controls and features in place to restrict and monitor access. Parents are too lazy to invest the time to learn about and implement these features. Parents need to start taking some bloody responisibility"

I think you have just highlighted the exact reason a ban is beneficial for the children that social target.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rBlueEyes35Man
1 day ago

Alloa


"Does this mean there will be forced age checks for us adults to use the likes of YouTube, Facebook, Twitter etc"

Mandatory Digital IDs "but its to protect the kids"

Seems like its going down that road cos who wouldnt sign up if its to protect people? Unless you have something to hide 🤷 government gets you every which way they can

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ustAnotherMan
1 day ago

Tamworth

Saying that X feature would be effective if people used it is saying there are no barriers in place. Education is an answer but a generational one we are already significantly behind on and won't change things in the immediacy. An under 16s ban makes sure the majority won't be able to access services that have resisted or pretended they have no responsibility to moderate their own platforms despite making millions from it. It puts them under pressure to see government is serious about taking their toys away if they don't play the game, the bluff they've called until now. It should allow them to put SM companies under pressure in future on other lobbying points with some teeth.

On the other hand, it plays into an increasing government oversight restricting the internet, which is bad, and kids become adults who have too many checks and monitoring in place.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *4bimMan
1 day ago

Farnborough Hampshire

this is a problem because companies like facebook and others do not want to pay to have everything moderated 24/7.

if they did harmful content would be stopped quicker, of course some would get through but a lot of the stuff you dont want children to see could be stopped if these companies actually cared and dealt with the problem.

but they wont because they love the revenue ads bring and all them fake a.i. scamming ads.

you always need some sort of control on things because if you didnt everyone would have weapons and be attacking each other over wheelie bins out early, dog barking and parking problems.

human beings are violent, they love violence, combat sports watching people getting beaten up online etc. people love it and sex is another issue altogether but the real problem is we do not treat facebook, instagram etc as publishers so they are not liable for the content people ost on them.

if they were made liable they instantly would emply moderators like no tomorrow or limit access to people who have criminal convictions for violence and sex offences.

they pray on people, predatory behaviour targetting kids with things that can put pressures on parents.

parents schools need to be tougher as well. giving the kid the phone to shut them up is the same when disney discovered they could sell millions of dvd's because lazy parents would sit the kids in front of the tv to get rid of them instead of actually being a good parent.

its time to hold social media companies to acount and fine them heavily until they actually start moderating content 100%. they can do it, but wont do it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tlanshiaWoman
1 day ago

Chatham

It’s a good thing

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rBlueEyes35Man
1 day ago

Alloa


"

you always need some sort of control on things because if you didnt everyone would have weapons and be attacking each other over wheelie bins out early,

"

Im forever grateful for the one person who does their bin early so I know which one goes out next 😂😂

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *isfits behaving badlyCouple
1 day ago

Coventry

I really worry for the kids these days, you can't do anything without it being recorded, posted to the Internet and remaining there forever.

Last night I was thinking about some of the stuff boys and girls would get up to on the back of the bus on school trips as teenagers. Which was a secret between those involved or at worse a rumour around the school that would be old news within the week. Now I can't imagine at least one person not recording it. Which has could now have ramifications for life of those involved and also potentially for those foolishly recording it and or posting it without properly thinking/understanding the legal and ethical issues (as kids often don't).

So if you can't do anything, say anything, make a mistake without it being recorded, posted forever and potentially used against you what does that do to you and how you behave? I mean even if your very conscious of social media and avoiding getting filmed in a bad light what do you have to sacrifice to be safe? It seems to me now for these kids life is constantly show time, they have to be constantly performing for the camera. It must be so stressful and knackering. You can't be yourself, you have to be so careful of taking risks, you can't make mistakes. Because the cost of getting it wrong can be a life sentence and in a world where the ramifications don't stay on the school ground, they follow you through the door and into the sanctity of your home. There's no escape from a social faux pas, an embarrassing/comprising moment or an error. Remember childhood is the time for making mistakes and learning without the same consequences of an adult. That's how we learn, we grow in what should be to protect bubble of childhood. And because children are growing and not mentally developed should they have access to such powerful and life changing tools?

How does that effect future societies? What is the impact of the stress, anxiety and pressure to be performative rather than real on kids as they develop? What is the impact on a society where children grow into adults who are incredibly risk adverse?

I'm generally really laid back but the more I think about the more I agree with the ban. How enforceable it is though is another matter.

Me

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *isfits behaving badlyCouple
1 day ago

Coventry

Mr

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aphunterMan
1 day ago

horsham

Social media ban, a good thing I think for u see 16. I went to a normal club a few months back with a mate, to dance two shit and try and relive raving days of our youth. Wasn’t the best club but was packed. If you raved at a time when there were no phones, you will know what they were like. I was so shocked to see that people were not dancing, more like gently swaying. Spoke to my kids who say it’s because everyone is worried about videos of them being posted.

They can’t go raving at 16, I understand that, but perhaps they will give less of a fuck when they are 18 and decide to go to a club for the first time and we will save the art of letting your hair down for generations to come.

It’s not just the phones, there is also other things that they are worried and about but don’t need to go over that.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *luttygirl25Woman
1 day ago

mids

I think it’s good in some ways but being a kid who struggles with social situations social media was a massive help for me and an outlet think they needed to create safer controls rather than ban it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ranny-CrumpetWoman
1 day ago

Crumpet Castle

All the over 16's are hypocrites anyway. If it's making kids ill, it's making us ill.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *WB85Man
1 day ago

Staffordshire

Definitely a good things, I'm really pleased its happened.

Kids can be horrible for such trivial things. Xbox live is horrendous some of the things we hear others saying.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hamallamadingdongMan
1 day ago

London

Good idea. Not sure how well it will be implemented. I don't know the ins and outs of it. Education and support is vital for the parents and children. They should use studies on addiction and how it affects the brain to explain why they are banning social media.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *its_and_TiramisuCouple
1 day ago

North Somerset


"It's a bad thing, ther's already plenty of parental controls and features in place to restrict and monitor access. Parents are too lazy to invest the time to learn about and implement these features. Parents need to start taking some bloody responisibility

I take it your a parent?

No im not and i don't need to be. I work in IT and Ive got a lot of neices and nephews"

I've helped many people set these up over the years on their children's phones.

Yes parental controls exist.

But kids will always find a way around them.

The best solution is age verification checks to access social media sites, along with proof of ID. That can't be faked.

But of course rhe conspiracy nuts go mental whenever they're asked to provide ID for anything online. Just look at how many (mostly men) kicked off when they had to confirm age to view their porn? 🤦🤦

Verified accounts would also result in accountability for what's posted, instead of being able to hide behind anonymous names and identities and post what BS people want to, along with shit stirring fake news, cyber bullying and basically arsehole online behaviour.

The fact anyone can pretend to be anyone is what makes social media the cesspool that it is, and why things like the online safety bill and banning under 16's is necessary in the first place.

Obi

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iver78Man
1 day ago

barton upon humber

Definitely a good thing , maybe we will have some kids get to there early teens without knowing about ADHD - mental health issues and all the other tag along ailments everyone seems to have these days !! Social media sets trends and rarely are they good ones

But im a man who believes we should have conscription lol ,

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ussexcouple40Couple
1 day ago

Sussex


"

Yes some kids will get round this, but not all. "

You had a typo

Yes all kids will get round this, not some.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ussexcouple40Couple
1 day ago

Sussex


"

The best solution is age verification checks to access social media sites, along with proof of ID. That can't be faked.

"

That isnt a solution. VERY easy to get around. Kids will know a way around it within the first day.

It's only adults of a certain age who wont. Which is what all these measures are aimed at.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ussexcouple40Couple
1 day ago

Sussex


"Definitely a good thing , maybe we will have some kids get to there early teens without knowing about ADHD - mental health issues and all the other tag along ailments everyone seems to have these days !! Social media sets trends and rarely are they good ones

But im a man who believes we should have conscription lol ,

"

and a man who has no clue how the internet works

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
1 day ago

in Lancashire


"Definitely a good thing , maybe we will have some kids get to there early teens without knowing about ADHD - mental health issues and all the other tag along ailments everyone seems to have these days !! Social media sets trends and rarely are they good ones

But im a man who believes we should have conscription lol ,

"

Or maybe research and science has led us to acknowledging such issues, the bad old days of the 'thick kid' falling massively behind the others who just happened to have dyslexia are thankfully gone..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouncerbiscuitMan
1 day ago

nottingham

I’m not sure how they could police it but I think it’s good so many bad things out there

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aphunterMan
1 day ago

horsham


"I think it’s good in some ways but being a kid who struggles with social situations social media was a massive help for me and an outlet think they needed to create safer controls rather than ban it "

I think I agree it’s not all bad, lots of positive people out there to follow. People will find a way to circumnavigate to find what they want.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *actile TensionMan
1 day ago

Sussex

Good thing.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ecadentDeviantsCouple
1 day ago

North West

Definitely agree with it.

Actual implementation & stopping workarounds will be difficult though, but at least the intent is there.

Social media is bad enough for adults never mind under 16’s!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *erdyHolly OP   TV/TS
1 day ago

In a galaxy far far away


"

Social media is bad enough for adults never mind under 16’s!"

It does raise the issue of when a kid becomes 16 and suddenly has access to social media rather than slowly being introduced to it over their life.

How will they deal/cope with it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iver78Man
1 day ago

barton upon humber


"Definitely a good thing , maybe we will have some kids get to there early teens without knowing about ADHD - mental health issues and all the other tag along ailments everyone seems to have these days !! Social media sets trends and rarely are they good ones

But im a man who believes we should have conscription lol ,

and a man who has no clue how the internet works"

Unfortunately I do , the internet starts trends , some harmless silly dances , some not so harmless ,

I have seen the rise in MH issues as we all have , and what is the reason , we live in the best times , no wars , high state benefits, no one should be struggling in this day and age but for some reason mentle health is the biggest reason for people not working or taking time off work because it's an easy excuse

Don't get me wrong I truly believe there are people struggling with there mentle health such as PTSD from coming out of war zones and experiencing real trauma , but iv seen people claiming to have from a break up lol , the world is full of snow flakes and it's because they are influenced by what they see on the internet , this is why the government is changing the criteria for people to claim sick benefits for mentle health issues , they would just.come out and say it's because people are taking g the piss , but again if they did there would be uproar because you can't say the truth these day without upsetting people who then say it's effecting there mentle health

I feel sorry for the genuine suffers , as a doctor friend of mine said " MH is the new bad back ,anyone can Google the symptoms

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ussexcouple40Couple
1 day ago

Sussex


"

Actual implementation & stopping workarounds will be difficult though, but at least the intent is there.

"

No it won't be "difficult", it is "impossible".

So doing something knowing it can't work is good intent?

Jeez.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ty31Man
1 day ago

NW London

Extreme in my view, too Nanny State.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ussexcouple40Couple
1 day ago

Sussex


"Definitely a good thing , maybe we will have some kids get to there early teens without knowing about ADHD - mental health issues and all the other tag along ailments everyone seems to have these days !! Social media sets trends and rarely are they good ones

But im a man who believes we should have conscription lol ,

and a man who has no clue how the internet works

Unfortunately I do , the internet starts trends , some harmless silly dances , some not so harmless ,

I have seen the rise in MH issues as we all have , and what is the reason , we live in the best times , no wars , high state benefits, no one should be struggling in this day and age but for some reason mentle health is the biggest reason for people not working or taking time off work because it's an easy excuse

Don't get me wrong I truly believe there are people struggling with there mentle health such as PTSD from coming out of war zones and experiencing real trauma , but iv seen people claiming to have from a break up lol , the world is full of snow flakes and it's because they are influenced by what they see on the internet , this is why the government is changing the criteria for people to claim sick benefits for mentle health issues , they would just.come out and say it's because people are taking g the piss , but again if they did there would be uproar because you can't say the truth these day without upsetting people who then say it's effecting there mentle health

I feel sorry for the genuine suffers , as a doctor friend of mine said " MH is the new bad back ,anyone can Google the symptoms

"

Cool beans, and NONE of that is solved by this. None at all. Because you have NO UNDERSTANDING of how the internet works, YOU think it is.

It wont, and kids will carry on as normal, while SOME adults will remain ignorant.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ussexcouple40Couple
1 day ago

Sussex


"

It does raise the issue of when a kid becomes 16 and suddenly has access to social media rather than slowly being introduced to it over their life.

How will they deal/cope with it."

It doesn't raise that issue, because they will have access to it under 16.

This only difference is, some of their parents will no longer realise this.

This puts most kids and parents in a MUCH WORSE situation

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hatsthemattayouMan
1 day ago

Warsash


"Extreme in my view, too Nanny State.

"

Would you allow kids to buy cigarettes?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ino200Man
1 day ago

Bournemouth,london and Sienna


"Has just been announced.

Is it a good thing or a bit extreme?"

Unfortunately its a good thing but we as adults have created the need for it with the information that we require good or bad ,we as adults have become lazy its easy to do everything on your phone pay for this pay for that ,look up this look up that and we after all teach our kids our kids are our product ,a total ban wont stop all but most .For me the point of no return was seeing a group of a girlfriends kids texting each other in the same living room ,technology is good in one way but no so in another .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iver78Man
1 day ago

barton upon humber


"Definitely a good thing , maybe we will have some kids get to there early teens without knowing about ADHD - mental health issues and all the other tag along ailments everyone seems to have these days !! Social media sets trends and rarely are they good ones

But im a man who believes we should have conscription lol ,

and a man who has no clue how the internet works

Unfortunately I do , the internet starts trends , some harmless silly dances , some not so harmless ,

I have seen the rise in MH issues as we all have , and what is the reason , we live in the best times , no wars , high state benefits, no one should be struggling in this day and age but for some reason mentle health is the biggest reason for people not working or taking time off work because it's an easy excuse

Don't get me wrong I truly believe there are people struggling with there mentle health such as PTSD from coming out of war zones and experiencing real trauma , but iv seen people claiming to have from a break up lol , the world is full of snow flakes and it's because they are influenced by what they see on the internet , this is why the government is changing the criteria for people to claim sick benefits for mentle health issues , they would just.come out and say it's because people are taking g the piss , but again if they did there would be uproar because you can't say the truth these day without upsetting people who then say it's effecting there mentle health

I feel sorry for the genuine suffers , as a doctor friend of mine said " MH is the new bad back ,anyone can Google the symptoms

Cool beans, and NONE of that is solved by this. None at all. Because you have NO UNDERSTANDING of how the internet works, YOU think it is.

It wont, and kids will carry on as normal, while SOME adults will remain ignorant.

"

I have a very good understanding of how it works

I deal with snow flakes all the time , I have one staff member who has been off nearly 4 weeks because his gf left him , the armed forces has over 55 percent increase in sickness since 1990 with the majority claiming MH issue , as an employer you cannot do anything about and these people know it , Google just how many claims for false dismissal have happend when an employer has sacked someone for time off due to mentle health !! You dare question someone on there return to work and they will spiel of the fact your not allowed to question them , it's quite simple , people know it's an easy way out .

Thank the lord that our parents and grandparents weren't like this , now they had an excuse to suffer with issues but they dident they struggled on with life , you go to Afghanistan or Iraq and see those people who have lost everything and literally have nothing ! We should be thankful for what we have , not sit at home on the internet picking up more tips on how to play the system , and making it harder for the genuine people to the help they need

Love to chat more but I have to cover someone who is off because his gf left him hahaha

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hesubtlegentMan
1 day ago

surrey

Yet another way of the government trying to control everyone and everything. Kids will find a way around the ban.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ussexcouple40Couple
1 day ago

Sussex


"Definitely a good thing , maybe we will have some kids get to there early teens without knowing about ADHD - mental health issues and all the other tag along ailments everyone seems to have these days !! Social media sets trends and rarely are they good ones

But im a man who believes we should have conscription lol ,

and a man who has no clue how the internet works

Unfortunately I do , the internet starts trends , some harmless silly dances , some not so harmless ,

I have seen the rise in MH issues as we all have , and what is the reason , we live in the best times , no wars , high state benefits, no one should be struggling in this day and age but for some reason mentle health is the biggest reason for people not working or taking time off work because it's an easy excuse

Don't get me wrong I truly believe there are people struggling with there mentle health such as PTSD from coming out of war zones and experiencing real trauma , but iv seen people claiming to have from a break up lol , the world is full of snow flakes and it's because they are influenced by what they see on the internet , this is why the government is changing the criteria for people to claim sick benefits for mentle health issues , they would just.come out and say it's because people are taking g the piss , but again if they did there would be uproar because you can't say the truth these day without upsetting people who then say it's effecting there mentle health

I feel sorry for the genuine suffers , as a doctor friend of mine said " MH is the new bad back ,anyone can Google the symptoms

Cool beans, and NONE of that is solved by this. None at all. Because you have NO UNDERSTANDING of how the internet works, YOU think it is.

It wont, and kids will carry on as normal, while SOME adults will remain ignorant.

I have a very good understanding of how it works

I deal with snow flakes all the time , I have one staff member who has been off nearly 4 weeks because his gf left him , the armed forces has over 55 percent increase in sickness since 1990 with the majority claiming MH issue , as an employer you cannot do anything about and these people know it , Google just how many claims for false dismissal have happend when an employer has sacked someone for time off due to mentle health !! You dare question someone on there return to work and they will spiel of the fact your not allowed to question them , it's quite simple , people know it's an easy way out .

Thank the lord that our parents and grandparents weren't like this , now they had an excuse to suffer with issues but they dident they struggled on with life , you go to Afghanistan or Iraq and see those people who have lost everything and literally have nothing ! We should be thankful for what we have , not sit at home on the internet picking up more tips on how to play the system , and making it harder for the genuine people to the help they need

Love to chat more but I have to cover someone who is off because his gf left him hahaha "

Again, cool story. BUT AGAIN, NONE of your cool story is solved by this measure. None of it. BUT because you don't understand how the internet works, YOU think it will sove this.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ino200Man
1 day ago

Bournemouth,london and Sienna

I think they should bring in fines for the parents that'll stop it all hit them where it hurts after all thats what they do with everything else isnt it ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hatsthemattayouMan
1 day ago

Warsash


"Yet another way of the government trying to control everyone and everything. Kids will find a way around the ban. "

It’s like saying “well kids will still smoke”

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *luttygirl25Woman
24 hours ago

mids

Well I think no one is thinking of people with difficulties that it helps and it’s not like the streets are safe at all either.

I have been followed and harassed in the street numerous times over the years not even late at night, my parents worry more about my sister being out than being on the internet as they can control that more

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iver78Man
24 hours ago

barton upon humber


"Definitely a good thing , maybe we will have some kids get to there early teens without knowing about ADHD - mental health issues and all the other tag along ailments everyone seems to have these days !! Social media sets trends and rarely are they good ones

But im a man who believes we should have conscription lol ,

and a man who has no clue how the internet works

Unfortunately I do , the internet starts trends , some harmless silly dances , some not so harmless ,

I have seen the rise in MH issues as we all have , and what is the reason , we live in the best times , no wars , high state benefits, no one should be struggling in this day and age but for some reason mentle health is the biggest reason for people not working or taking time off work because it's an easy excuse

Don't get me wrong I truly believe there are people struggling with there mentle health such as PTSD from coming out of war zones and experiencing real trauma , but iv seen people claiming to have from a break up lol , the world is full of snow flakes and it's because they are influenced by what they see on the internet , this is why the government is changing the criteria for people to claim sick benefits for mentle health issues , they would just.come out and say it's because people are taking g the piss , but again if they did there would be uproar because you can't say the truth these day without upsetting people who then say it's effecting there mentle health

I feel sorry for the genuine suffers , as a doctor friend of mine said " MH is the new bad back ,anyone can Google the symptoms

Cool beans, and NONE of that is solved by this. None at all. Because you have NO UNDERSTANDING of how the internet works, YOU think it is.

It wont, and kids will carry on as normal, while SOME adults will remain ignorant.

I have a very good understanding of how it works

I deal with snow flakes all the time , I have one staff member who has been off nearly 4 weeks because his gf left him , the armed forces has over 55 percent increase in sickness since 1990 with the majority claiming MH issue , as an employer you cannot do anything about and these people know it , Google just how many claims for false dismissal have happend when an employer has sacked someone for time off due to mentle health !! You dare question someone on there return to work and they will spiel of the fact your not allowed to question them , it's quite simple , people know it's an easy way out .

Thank the lord that our parents and grandparents weren't like this , now they had an excuse to suffer with issues but they dident they struggled on with life , you go to Afghanistan or Iraq and see those people who have lost everything and literally have nothing ! We should be thankful for what we have , not sit at home on the internet picking up more tips on how to play the system , and making it harder for the genuine people to the help they need

Love to chat more but I have to cover someone who is off because his gf left him hahaha

Again, cool story. BUT AGAIN, NONE of your cool story is solved by this measure. None of it. BUT because you don't understand how the internet works, YOU think it will sove this.

"

Well I'd love someone to tell me how it works lol ,

It has many many good points, but also has many bad ones , I like many think banning under 16s from social media ,but cannot see how it will be governed, but iv recently duscoverd tic tok and can say hand on heart it's pathetic , yes some interesting content, so.e very amusing content , but lots is very concerning, how to seek help if your struggling , and most the issues are just day to issues which anyone would normal just see as part of life's daily struggles , but they advise seeking medical help and which drugs work !!

But happy for someone to explain to me " how the internet works ' or as my teenage son says to me , you "just dont get it " lol with no explanation

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arathonMan86Man
24 hours ago

Essex

Banning social media for under-16s is meant to keep young people away from things like bullying, toxic content, privacy issues, and apps designed to keep them hooked.

Some people reckon it's needed for protection, while others say kids will just find a way around it and miss out on the good side of social media too.

For me, the real question is how we keep young people safe online without completely shutting them out of the digital world.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hatsthemattayouMan
24 hours ago

Warsash


"Well I think no one is thinking of people with difficulties that it helps and it’s not like the streets are safe at all either.

I have been followed and harassed in the street numerous times over the years not even late at night, my parents worry more about my sister being out than being on the internet as they can control that more "

You don’t reckon keeping 12-15 year olds out of spaces with people like Andrew Tate will reduce incidents of female violence?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inaTitzTV/TS
24 hours ago

Titz Towers, North Notts

Private Eye point out that research shows that the people most likely to fall for online scams and disinformation are the over 60s

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *luttygirl25Woman
24 hours ago

mids


"Well I think no one is thinking of people with difficulties that it helps and it’s not like the streets are safe at all either.

I have been followed and harassed in the street numerous times over the years not even late at night, my parents worry more about my sister being out than being on the internet as they can control that more

You don’t reckon keeping 12-15 year olds out of spaces with people like Andrew Tate will reduce incidents of female violence? "

Yes that’s why I said previously they need to create a safer space and allow parents more controls

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *wist my nipplesCouple
24 hours ago

North East Scotland, mostly


"Private Eye point out that research shows that the people most likely to fall for online scams and disinformation are the over 60s "

GET EM BANNED I SAY

(this may be a facetious comment)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *Effy-Woman
24 hours ago

Scotland

It's a good thing.

Will it work in keeping them off social media? No.

So all in all, it's a pretty pointless law.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iver78Man
23 hours ago

barton upon humber


"It's a good thing.

Will it work in keeping them off social media? No.

So all in all, it's a pretty pointless law. "

Vary fair point , maybe they need to focus on the people who create the harmful content , still a massive task but gotta be easier than banning every child !?

I was on tic tok earlier!! Yes I know sad but kills time lol , and am amazed at how many o f. S people and corn stars are on there , that's gotta be wrong ?

I only went on there to watch fishing tips and some bloke who goes wild swimming!!.and somehow they pop up

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icolerobbieCouple
23 hours ago

Walsall

No, I don’t like the amount of state control already.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ellinever70Woman
23 hours ago

Ayrshire

I think we have to at least try something

The devil will be in the detail though

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iltsTSgirlTV/TS
23 hours ago

Chichester

It’s a sledge hammer to a surgical issue

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *erdyHolly OP   TV/TS
23 hours ago

In a galaxy far far away

Some sats from Australia I've just googled:

Ongoing Access:

A study by the Molly Rose Foundation revealed that 61% of children aged 12 to 15 who used restricted platforms before the ban retain active accounts.

App Breakdown:

Of the children still actively bypassing the restrictions, 53% still use TikTok, 53% access YouTube, and 52% use Instagram.

Platform Inaction:

Two-thirds of continuing YouTube users and 60% of continuing TikTok and Instagram users reported that platforms took no action to deactivate their accounts.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rHotNottsMan
23 hours ago

Dubai & Nottingham

Didn’t all these mental health issues exist long before social media? We just didn’t have names for them. Well, we did, but we’re not allowed to use those names anymore. I’m not so sure this will help. I know people who send their kids to free schools that have zero tech, and they still have all kinds of issues because they are growing up in a fast changing complicated world, that they are struggling to fit into, just like old people, young people need taking care of better. The answer is not banning social media.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *Effy-Woman
23 hours ago

Scotland


"It's a good thing.

Will it work in keeping them off social media? No.

So all in all, it's a pretty pointless law.

Vary fair point , maybe they need to focus on the people who create the harmful content , still a massive task but gotta be easier than banning every child !?

I was on tic tok earlier!! Yes I know sad but kills time lol , and am amazed at how many o f. S people and corn stars are on there , that's gotta be wrong ?

I only went on there to watch fishing tips and some bloke who goes wild swimming!!.and somehow they pop up "

I think we need to focus more on online safety. Social media and the Internet as a whole is a massive part of everyone's lives. I have a highschooler, she has been given and ipad to do all her school work on. The time of doing written work at school is slowly being fazed out. There should be a specific class they must take to educate them on it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
Forum Mod

23 hours ago

Central

I think it's a good thing, in addition to parents limiting kids exposure. Access to tech from a young age is worse than real play, communication, reading and learning differently.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *wingersGilfandDHCouple
23 hours ago

London, United Kingdom

It's not kids that'll be affected.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ty31Man
22 hours ago

NW London


"Extreme in my view, too Nanny State.

Would you allow kids to buy cigarettes? "

Which has what to do with social media?

Smoking is something which has no positive side effects whatsoever and has long term health consequences which requires a person to be of age to understand and consider these consequences prior to partaking. In the same way it would be incredibly irresponsible for a parent to enable their child to smoke.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *imi_RougeWoman
22 hours ago

Hampshire

Good thing, they grow up too quick as it is, they don't need to see god knows what on social, media being influenced by people who aren't living real genuine lives. And pressured to look a certain way.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *urreyGuy19792Man
22 hours ago

Egham

It's swatting a fly with a sledgehammer and will be ineffective.

On top of that, social media, for all its ills (and there are many) can be a safe space for young people in marginalised groups eg trans. For some, it can be their only lifeline to similar people or those who are kind to them.

tl;dr - it won't work and will have more negative than positive effects.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *veragecouple2000Couple
22 hours ago

South Wales

I think it’s a good thing and they have to at least try something to limit children’s usage xx 😘

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *angled up in twoCouple
22 hours ago

West Mids

Too many parents just don't care enough and they'd rather their kids have access to their phones so they're less bother, I can't see it working.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hatsthemattayouMan
22 hours ago

Warsash


"Extreme in my view, too Nanny State.

Would you allow kids to buy cigarettes?

Which has what to do with social media?

Smoking is something which has no positive side effects whatsoever and has long term health consequences which requires a person to be of age to understand and consider these consequences prior to partaking. In the same way it would be incredibly irresponsible for a parent to enable their child to smoke. "

So the “nanny state” doesn’t apply in the smoking instance? I thought people and parents could make their own choices?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mf123Man
21 hours ago

with one foot out the door

I wonder with all these online bans for this n that if razzle will make a comeback

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *parkle1974Woman
20 hours ago

Leeds

In all honesty....

Patents should parent more. You see kids handed a phone/tablet just to keep them quiet

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hatsthemattayouMan
20 hours ago

Warsash


"In all honesty....

Patents should parent more. You see kids handed a phone/tablet just to keep them quiet"

m

This isn’t about kids watching peppa pig on a iPad

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arakiss12TV/TS
20 hours ago

Bedfuck

It's good but could be better if they had set better restrictions on kids accounts both in coming and out going traffic in the first pkace.

Then a total ban could have been avoided.

Also anonymous accounts so predators don't know is at the other end.

Make it genderless age free.

Use of Avatars to disguise children's accounts.

Finally teach kids to be safety conscious and aware of dangerous contacts.

However I don't sympathise with kids because they have too much too young these days compared to kids 50 40 30 yrs ago.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *parkle1974Woman
20 hours ago

Leeds


"In all honesty....

Patents should parent more. You see kids handed a phone/tablet just to keep them quietm

This isn’t about kids watching peppa pig on a iPad "

I didn't say it was

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arakiss12TV/TS
19 hours ago

Bedfuck

Also they should ban kids from.

Sweets.

Going to the cinema unaccompanied by an adult.

Staying up after 9pm

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hePerkyPumpkinTV/TS
19 hours ago

Bristol

Yes I think it's a good thing that children are banned from Social Media.

Part of me thinks I'm just being an old man... But another part of me thinks, fuck social media.

The internet has become such a predatory and insidious entity.

If it's not algorithms designed to keep you hooked; it's pushing an agenda, it's pushing a narrative with news tailored to suit whatever political ideals you have to further entrench you and to further divide us.

And at this point, there's a good chance you're watching content uploaded from an AI bot account, using AI generated material... Commented on by other bot accounts to drive engagement!

We have fumbled the internet so bad.

Still useful for porn though 💪

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arakiss12TV/TS
19 hours ago

Bedfuck


"Yes I think it's a good thing that children are banned from Social Media.

Part of me thinks I'm just being an old man... But another part of me thinks, fuck social media.

The internet has become such a predatory and insidious entity.

If it's not algorithms designed to keep you hooked; it's pushing an agenda, it's pushing a narrative with news tailored to suit whatever political ideals you have to further entrench you and to further divide us.

And at this point, there's a good chance you're watching content uploaded from an AI bot account, using AI generated material... Commented on by other bot accounts to drive engagement!

We have fumbled the internet so bad.

Still useful for porn though 💪"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arakiss12TV/TS
19 hours ago

Bedfuck

The little dictator on my shoulder says bring back the workhouse for the naughty ones

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *airyZedMan
19 hours ago

Haverhill

I think it's good but... way to late...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *xSirenaxxWoman
17 hours ago

SW

Already in place in my house and had been for years

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondsmiles.Woman
17 hours ago

SW1A1AA

I agree with it. My son is 36 and kids didnt really have mobile phones, he certainly never had one. He was out with his mates and had his first phone at 16. He still isnt on social media as he didnt grow up with it.

My grandchildren are at the age they wont know any different.

I know im old fashioned but it might get kids out doing sport or taking up hobbies as they used to do.

Most kids arnt bad but if it stops bullying and deaths because of some social media challenge then it can only be a good thing

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ools and the brainCouple
16 hours ago

couple, us we him her.

100% agree for far too long now we have been forced to discharge our responsibilities as parents and adults, forced by Liberal parties and so called do gooders who think it's responsible to allow children to grow up unhindered by rules and conditions.

It's a very strange culture we live in today on one hans we wrap kids up in cotton wool and prevent them from learning failure and real life lessons. On the other we have in place a practice of giving them pretty much unhindered access to all the evils in the world right from the palm of their hands.

It's a mess.

Parents need to be parents have the ability to protect their children and be responsible.

Adults need to take responsibility for the protection of minors rather than washing their hands of the situation claiming it's out of their control.

We are seeing the LIVE results of this culture NOW right before our eye's in your street, town, city...

CHILDREN killing, rxping, committing horrendous crimes with little fear of consequences.

By curtailing the access to social media it gives parents, teachers and care givers the power to take back responsibility for the children in their care, rather than impressionable minds being poisoned by people whose sole purpose is to spread hatred and fear.

It's about time we got back to old fashioned values but with a modern approach

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hinstrapMan
16 hours ago

sheffield

I can I my see this as a good thing. Kids and young teens have for too much cyber world to deal with. So much to compete with. Compare against. Dealing with fakes. Lies. Truths etc. far too many are struggling dealing with it. Sadly having issues. Self worth and confidence issues etc. there young minds can't deal with. Let them grow up more even 16 maybe to early. It's defo a positive move in my eyes.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ananabrumMan
12 hours ago

castle bromwich

How many of you have realised that baning social media for under 16's means you're going to have to validate your age on all social media, gaming and live streaming platforms to prove your old enough to use them

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rubleCouple
12 hours ago

Wokingham

I’m afraid it is a bad thing. I am a parent and both my children had access to social media but used it wisely.

If something in social media is bad for children it is bad for adults. Educate the children properly and get them interested so they don’t use social media all the time. À weak decision is to restrict rather than attract. À hammer is useful but also dangerous, ban hammers? Stop doing wood work because the tools are dangerous? This act is emphasising just how badly Government and adults have failed children and society in general

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rubleCouple
12 hours ago

Wokingham


"The little dictator on my shoulder says bring back the workhouse for the naughty ones"

Exactly 👍

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ino200Man
10 hours ago

Bournemouth,london and Sienna

We are being controlled in everything we do or say pretty soon we won't be able to say or do anything .......Big Bro is watching

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *thsinnerMan
8 hours ago

belfast

The safety of children has nothing to do with this.

This is a smoke screen to force digital id's. Which they have been trying to find a way to do since lockdowns.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lternative lifestyleCouple
7 hours ago

Louth

Grew up with no internet or mobile phones, didnt need them, they don't either. We learned to interact. Phone calls were with phone cards in a phone box and we survived.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *carlettsWoman
7 hours ago

Harpenden


"Definitely a good thing

Too buried in phone..."

Exaxtly. My mate and I were talking the other day saying when we was very young no social media, we used to create our own fun, going for bike rides, building tree houses, played ganes, rollar skating and sitting down for family dinners no phones. Nowadays some kids can barely have a conversation without looking at their phones.

Social media can be great when used safely and correctly but I watched a sextortion programme the other day and children commiting suicide because of cyber bullying or black*ail is just shockingly sad

It is a good thing in my opinion but know that it will be very hard for those who currently use social media, but as someone else has said they will possibly find ways around it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *illybeachboyMan
6 hours ago

Guernsey

Its a great idea and should have been done years ago.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ornucopiaMan
6 hours ago

Bexley


"

Yes some kids will get round this, but not all.

You had a typo

Yes all kids will get round this, not some."

Not quite all, but the ones who don't will get left behind.

Inevitable, then, it wont work!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *irAtlasMan
6 hours ago

Dorking

Massive government over reach and an enforcement of digital IDs

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittleteaseWoman
6 hours ago

Norfolk


"Does this mean there will be forced age checks for us adults to use the likes of YouTube, Facebook, Twitter etc"

Yes there will be. We will have to prove who we are. That's why they want us to be on the ID system. Its way keeping us in control. They already try tells us how look after are children. There are age restrictions on social media . My child accounts was all connected to my phone. My child is in college and 18 now and studying all about social media. There lot we you shouldn't do until your 18 but we still did it. We not aloud to talk about on here. So i don't think it will work

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hismMan
5 hours ago

Ballygonowhere


"Its a good thing, children don't need access to toxic or dangerous things. They don't need their minds filled with unrealistic expectations and beauty standards. They don't need to be exposed to bullying at home when they can escape it after school.

I'm grateful I was the generation of actually being a kid. Yes we had MSN and Bebo but it didn't control our lives like it does today."

So children don't need access "to toxic or dangerous things" ?

So let's ban left wing woke schools,woke teachers,our woke police forces our woke media like the BBC who influence children every day without teaching them there's an alternative?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *heelerMan
5 hours ago

Northants

Ban it all the world be a better and safer place.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *thsinnerMan
5 hours ago

belfast


"Ban it all the world be a better and safer place."

Don't worry, black outs are planned within the next 12 months. Short bursts..

People will get a reminder of what its like to not have the internet for five minutes.

They'll be forced to go outside and talk to real people again.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ools and the brainCouple
5 hours ago

couple, us we him her.


"The safety of children has nothing to do with this.

This is a smoke screen to force digital id's. Which they have been trying to find a way to do since lockdowns.

"

Oh dear

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tudley Dudley the VoyeurMan
5 hours ago

The Hill


"I think it's time to let kids do kids stuff rather than having constant access to stuff they shouldn't , what's wrong with going back to not having access to everything 24/7"

Society has changed! What happens if one child has access and another doesn't, the FOMO would be huge. Has the govt asked the teenagers what they want? Another over reach from this shambles

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tudley Dudley the VoyeurMan
5 hours ago

The Hill

Couldn't make it stick because adults know better so now they are going after the children. Control is all they are wanting nothing more or less.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *thsinnerMan
5 hours ago

belfast


"Couldn't make it stick because adults know better so now they are going after the children. Control is all they are wanting nothing more or less."

Its more like going after the adults through the children though isn't it?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ornucopiaMan
4 hours ago

Bexley


"Ban it all the world be a better and safer place.

Don't worry, black outs are planned within the next 12 months. Short bursts..

People will get a reminder of what its like to not have the internet for five minutes.

They'll be forced to go outside and talk to real people again.

"

Or not bother with either form of interaction!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ick MastersMan
1 hour ago

Birmingham

[Removed by poster at 16/06/26 11:02:06]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ick MastersMan
1 hour ago

Birmingham

I’m against. I know the internet is a lot shitter than it used to be, but I don’t like the mumsnetification of things in the uk. And don’t see how it could practically be enforced.

This country is increasingly a bad place to be a kid/young adult and I’m glad I done have to live though it if I’m honest.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tarlightvoyager21Man
1 hour ago

London

[Removed by poster at 16/06/26 11:20:46]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tarlightvoyager21Man
1 hour ago

London

I have mixed opinion on it,

- Ban won't change the fact that people need to be good at parenting!

- It is definitely rots your brain, but also the exposure you get is unmatched

I was grew up in a village 3rd world country. Half of my hobbies are from my "online friends" it's way easier to find peers who have similar interests online.

Lmao I remember watching "str skill school" to learn football skill because there's no infrastructure irl.

I'm all for banning tiktok and social media but YouTube is where I draw the line. It's pretty much a replacement for news, teacher, entertainment, fitness, coach and brainrot ofc

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lkGuyMagic24Man
1 hour ago

Kingswood

It’s a good thing

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *avenwrexham75TV/TS
15 minutes ago

Wrexham

It's a bad thing.

Why would restricting social media from under16s suddenly make them able to deal with it when the locks come off?

Answer...it won't.

In most cases it will create bigger problems than what we already see.

You don't ban young kids from swimming because of the risk of drowning, instead you create safe spaces for them to learn with proper instruction and trained lifeguards.

That's what's needed. Education of teens and young children.

Providers need to tighten up restrictions and make more checks.

Put the responsibility on them and parents to police their children's access to online and social media...we certainly do and they know why. We tell them the risks, who could be out there, we make them internet savvy.

I wouldn't allow young children on certain sites, and they don't take their phones upstairs with them.

They are restricted to time limits on any device.

It seems to be working.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lkGuyMagic24Man
12 minutes ago

Kingswood


"It's a bad thing.

Why would restricting social media from under16s suddenly make them able to deal with it when the locks come off?

Answer...it won't.

In most cases it will create bigger problems than what we already see.

You don't ban young kids from swimming because of the risk of drowning, instead you create safe spaces for them to learn with proper instruction and trained lifeguards.

That's what's needed. Education of teens and young children.

Providers need to tighten up restrictions and make more checks.

Put the responsibility on them and parents to police their children's access to online and social media...we certainly do and they know why. We tell them the risks, who could be out there, we make them internet savvy.

I wouldn't allow young children on certain sites, and they don't take their phones upstairs with them.

They are restricted to time limits on any device.

It seems to be working.

"

Nah I think it’s a good thing same as the ban on porn without ID, these things need restriction at least whilst you introduce a safer environment. Sometimes actions needs to be taken NOW and I applaud it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *avenwrexham75TV/TS
1 minute ago!

Wrexham

But you can create Safe environments within social media...our kids have child you tube accounts that are age appropriate.

Online gaming is a good example, Fortnite has age restrictions on their content that requires a parental consent to open up for a child to play.

You can stop them playing with strangers, you can stop them talking on headphones etc..

I totally agree porn sites needed regulating as it was far too easy to access those on a Google search! But they aren't social media.

What's going to happen..all of a sudden a child has no access under the ban. Sounds good, they don't get bombarded by the bait and crap out there.

They turn 16, mum and dad go , here you go, join tiktok, Snapchat, Instagram etc..they revel in whats available unaware of the hidden dangers now out there, as I assume once they are of age, the providers don't care about restrictions, they have done their bit.

Providers can easily restrict content by age appropriate...it is then the responsibility of parents to create those age appropriate accounts for their children if needed.

Children shouldn't be let loose with their own phone accounts anyway, parents should control their account through theirs.

If providers and parents can be responsible and do this, it doesn't need a blanket ban.

Kids aren't daft, the more you take something away, the more they will find ways to try and get it away from their parents....and that will just create lots more issues.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top