FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

David Sullivan

Jump to newest
 

By *arakiss12 OP   TV/TS
1 day ago

Bedfuck

Although I'm a West Ham fan, I've never been really sold on Mr Sullivans notoriety.

Recent claims of sexual harassment against him seem a bit wierd after so long. Probably the early investigations were squashed by the law at the time.

Now times have changed and his past may be catching up on him.

Some would say the women should have known better than to get involved but then they were exploiting his organisation to gain fame n fortune.

A case of you scratch my back or clear sexual harassment.

Finding it hard to side with either party.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *onin25Man
1 day ago

Durham

Allegedly used his position of power to get women to have sex with him. Suspect there is a lot of truth behind it.

Also used to publish pieces about 15 year old girls who it would soon be legal to publish topless pics of with countdowns until their birthdays. Pretty disgusting man even if the former allegations ended up as false (which I think is unlikely).

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ellinever70Woman
1 day ago

Ayrshire

Sadly, allegations like this no longer surprise me

Hopefully high profile cases like this will send a clear message to men and women

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ewMan2026Man
1 day ago

Chester and Liverpool


"Although I'm a West Ham fan, I've never been really sold on Mr Sullivans notoriety.

Recent claims of sexual harassment against him seem a bit wierd after so long. Probably the early investigations were squashed by the law at the time.

Now times have changed and his past may be catching up on him.

Some would say the women should have known better than to get involved but then they were exploiting his organisation to gain fame n fortune.

A case of you scratch my back or clear sexual harassment.

Finding it hard to side with either party."

That shows no understanding of how sexual abuse happens. It puts some blame on the victim, a very male view.

Grim.

Victims of abuse should be listened to and supported. Sullivan had all the power and it was an open secret for decades what he was like

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ools and the brainCouple
1 day ago

couple, us we him her.

Rich powerful people abusing their position to get what they want, hmmmm doesn't seem possible

.

TRUMP

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arakiss12 OP   TV/TS
1 day ago

Bedfuck


"Although I'm a West Ham fan, I've never been really sold on Mr Sullivans notoriety.

Recent claims of sexual harassment against him seem a bit wierd after so long. Probably the early investigations were squashed by the law at the time.

Now times have changed and his past may be catching up on him.

Some would say the women should have known better than to get involved but then they were exploiting his organisation to gain fame n fortune.

A case of you scratch my back or clear sexual harassment.

Finding it hard to side with either party.

That shows no understanding of how sexual abuse happens. It puts some blame on the victim, a very male view.

Grim.

Victims of abuse should be listened to and supported. Sullivan had all the power and it was an open secret for decades what he was like"

I'm more cynical than male empathy.

I know of several cases where female manipulation can be overlooked and a the so called perpetrator gets all the blame.

If the the females claiming abuse are genuine, fair enough.

If however they were out to exploit the situation and manipulate it for their own gain then whose to blame?

The truth should prevail not for the sake of a cause because genuine victims won't be believed. PC gone wrong?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *wist my nipplesCouple
1 day ago

North East Scotland, mostly


"Although I'm a West Ham fan, I've never been really sold on Mr Sullivans notoriety.

Recent claims of sexual harassment against him seem a bit wierd after so long. Probably the early investigations were squashed by the law at the time.

Now times have changed and his past may be catching up on him.

Some would say the women should have known better than to get involved but then they were exploiting his organisation to gain fame n fortune.

A case of you scratch my back or clear sexual harassment.

Finding it hard to side with either party.

That shows no understanding of how sexual abuse happens. It puts some blame on the victim, a very male view.

Grim.

Victims of abuse should be listened to and supported. Sullivan had all the power and it was an open secret for decades what he was like

I'm more cynical than male empathy.

I know of several cases where female manipulation can be overlooked and a the so called perpetrator gets all the blame.

If the the females claiming abuse are genuine, fair enough.

If however they were out to exploit the situation and manipulate it for their own gain then whose to blame?

The truth should prevail not for the sake of a cause because genuine victims won't be believed. PC gone wrong?

"

Statistically, there are far more examples of women being abused by predators than women falsely accusing others. It’s a red herring in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary (not specifically this case, I’m talking in general). When a woman speaks up, I believe her.

Mrs TMN

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arakiss12 OP   TV/TS
1 day ago

Bedfuck

It begs the question why would women go into an industry where they are more likely to be open to abuse.

It's a bad world out there why should people expect the porn industry be any different.

The casting couch has been awell known hurdle for zonks, are women that naive to think it didn't exist. Surely you'd check out the organisation and it's proprietor first before even remotely getting involved like any job.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aradox26Man
1 day ago

At home…


"Finding it hard to side with either party."

Powerful male figure who dominated and controlled an industry with huge wealth using that to his advantage to prey on younger, vulnerable women? Hardly a new or unique situation is it? With lots of examples of how that dynamic played out in the past with others.

Of course there will be a few who will victim shame, and blame the girls involved, along with “fake claims” brigade. Statistically, the number of fake allegations, that is where allegations have been proven to be false, are very, very low.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ellhungvweMan
1 day ago

Cheltenham

I actually feel this is incredibly lazy journalism.

On Monday you have Malcolm Phillips who gets an absolute discharge for horrendous abuse (physical, mental and sexual) at a child’s home and it doesn’t even make the front page yet at the same time a serial 1980s sex entrepreneur has adult models making allegations and it gets prime time television.

Sullivan is click bait. Phillips is the real story but it will never be told.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arand25Couple
1 day ago

Crowborough

As a fellow WH fan I'm just relieved he's gone. We've all thought he was dodgy for a long time & Brady going suddenly without warning made me think something was coming.

Need a buyout now!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ewMan2026Man
1 day ago

Chester and Liverpool


"It begs the question why would women go into an industry where they are more likely to be open to abuse.

It's a bad world out there why should people expect the porn industry be any different.

The casting couch has been awell known hurdle for zonks, are women that naive to think it didn't exist. Surely you'd check out the organisation and it's proprietor first before even remotely getting involved like any job."

Blame the women, yeah that’s right.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ewMan2026Man
1 day ago

Chester and Liverpool


"Although I'm a West Ham fan, I've never been really sold on Mr Sullivans notoriety.

Recent claims of sexual harassment against him seem a bit wierd after so long. Probably the early investigations were squashed by the law at the time.

Now times have changed and his past may be catching up on him.

Some would say the women should have known better than to get involved but then they were exploiting his organisation to gain fame n fortune.

A case of you scratch my back or clear sexual harassment.

Finding it hard to side with either party.

That shows no understanding of how sexual abuse happens. It puts some blame on the victim, a very male view.

Grim.

Victims of abuse should be listened to and supported. Sullivan had all the power and it was an open secret for decades what he was like

I'm more cynical than male empathy.

I know of several cases where female manipulation can be overlooked and a the so called perpetrator gets all the blame.

If the the females claiming abuse are genuine, fair enough.

If however they were out to exploit the situation and manipulate it for their own gain then whose to blame?

The truth should prevail not for the sake of a cause because genuine victims won't be believed. PC gone wrong?

Statistically, there are far more examples of women being abused by predators than women falsely accusing others. It’s a red herring in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary (not specifically this case, I’m talking in general). When a woman speaks up, I believe her.

Mrs TMN"

Spot on. For every one person - men and women- who manipulates things (usually for compensation) there are thousands of real victims

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *dward_TeagueMan
1 day ago

wolverhampton

This is a man who had 15 year old girls in his newspaper next to a countdown to their 16th birthday when they could publish topless pictures of them. I found that to be disturbing back then and the passage of time had not changed that. Thankfully the law has been changed so the models must be 18 before naked images can be published.

The evidence suggests that he was a sexual predator and it seems he had a nickname in the adult industry, “no blow job, no job”.

A wrong ‘un.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *l_xxxMan
1 day ago

South leeds

It would be nice if allegations are investigated without media speculation/pressure. Makes it fair for both sides.

Disappointingly, its taking too many private investigations to force pressure for official investigations. I only hope things are changing that every allegation is taken seriously and objectively.

Trial by media amounts to a witch hunt and never gets to the truth and in some cases, claims of bias due to being too PC.

Are we reaching a point where finding a good honest kind person is so rare it will make front page news? It feels like it sometimes.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inaTitzTV/TS
1 day ago

Titz Towers, North Notts

Private Eye have been saying he's whiffy for yonks

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *en_Dover79Man
24 hours ago

Oswaldtwistle

anyone high profile in the adult industry would have been up to no good. Not a shock

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ools and the brainCouple
24 hours ago

couple, us we him her.

1 in 4 women in the UK.

Says all you need to know about the shocking disgusting state of things.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *it62Man
24 hours ago

leeds/Bradford

As a WHU fan I am glad that this is finally out there. It has been known for years that he was a dodgy seedy old man. Perhaps now the club can move in a direction more suited to its tradition and loyal following rather than being used as a toy for this billionaire scoundrel.

I think that the evidence shown on Panorama is, at best vague and certainly historic.

If there was any actual evidence then this could have and should have been dealt with years ago.

My best guess is that nothing will come of the accusations, true or otherwise and Sullivan will use his financial wealth to demand an apology and likely get a court to uphold his claim of libel and add to his coffers.

The women may have been nieve and in search of fame, but what he is alleged to have done is wrong, if unsurprising.

I'm sure that there are numerous other women with similar claims against Sullivan and others like him.

It will rumble on until it runs out of steam.

For us fans of The Irons, Sullivan's exposure has rid the club of a foolish tyrant and we can hope, expect even, a brighter future.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ocialablechapMan
24 hours ago

Paphos and also SW UK

Him , Brady and Gold bros were in charge at Bham City before selling up and moving over to home team WHU.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *wcoMan
18 hours ago

West Midlands


"I actually feel this is incredibly lazy journalism.

On Monday you have Malcolm Phillips who gets an absolute discharge for horrendous abuse (physical, mental and sexual) at a child’s home and it doesn’t even make the front page yet at the same time a serial 1980s sex entrepreneur has adult models making allegations and it gets prime time television.

Sullivan is click bait. Phillips is the real story but it will never be told."

I see where you're coming from but I don't think DS has chucked West Ham just because a few women said he wanted noshing off in return for a job 20+ years ago.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *wcoMan
18 hours ago

West Midlands


"As a WHU fan I am glad that this is finally out there. It has been known for years that he was a dodgy seedy old man. Perhaps now the club can move in a direction more suited to its tradition and loyal following rather than being used as a toy for this billionaire scoundrel.

I think that the evidence shown on Panorama is, at best vague and certainly historic.

If there was any actual evidence then this could have and should have been dealt with years ago.

My best guess is that nothing will come of the accusations, true or otherwise and Sullivan will use his financial wealth to demand an apology and likely get a court to uphold his claim of libel and add to his coffers.

The women may have been nieve and in search of fame, but what he is alleged to have done is wrong, if unsurprising.

I'm sure that there are numerous other women with similar claims against Sullivan and others like him.

It will rumble on until it runs out of steam.

For us fans of The Irons, Sullivan's exposure has rid the club of a foolish tyrant and we can hope, expect even, a brighter future."

The story was subject to an anonymity order, paid for by DS. That was challenged and quashed about a month ago, hence the story coming out now. I don't think he's going to be getting libel for this.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *wcoMan
18 hours ago

West Midlands


"Him , Brady and Gold bros were in charge at Bham City before selling up and moving over to home team WHU. "

Sold us to a bunch of crooks. The new chairman (Yeung) was in prison a few years later for money laundering. His side-kick was a disgraced former Hong Kong top cop, who was found to be 'in bed' with triad gangs.

He won't give a stuff who who's leaving his shares in West Ham to.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *igtoyMan
16 hours ago

Ask if interested


"Rich powerful people abusing their position to get what they want, hmmmm doesn't seem possible

.

TRUMP "

Every politician ever

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *igtoyMan
16 hours ago

Ask if interested


"As a WHU fan I am glad that this is finally out there. It has been known for years that he was a dodgy seedy old man. Perhaps now the club can move in a direction more suited to its tradition and loyal following rather than being used as a toy for this billionaire scoundrel.

I think that the evidence shown on Panorama is, at best vague and certainly historic.

If there was any actual evidence then this could have and should have been dealt with years ago.

My best guess is that nothing will come of the accusations, true or otherwise and Sullivan will use his financial wealth to demand an apology and likely get a court to uphold his claim of libel and add to his coffers.

The women may have been nieve and in search of fame, but what he is alleged to have done is wrong, if unsurprising.

I'm sure that there are numerous other women with similar claims against Sullivan and others like him.

It will rumble on until it runs out of steam.

For us fans of The Irons, Sullivan's exposure has rid the club of a foolish tyrant and we can hope, expect even, a brighter future."

You are missing a massive point. Panorama had to restrain themselves due to the watershed. Mainstream press, world renowned papers like The Times have an enormous amounts of alleged evidence that is still to be made public. Its a massive disgusting scandal.

Essex Police clearly corrupt aswell. Their investigations should be reviewed by independant assessors.

Rumble on? I dont think so. Snowball momentum....deffo.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
15 hours ago

in Lancashire

He was banned by the club, the FA and the local authority from any contact with the clubs womens and youth teams in 2023..

Thats quite damning..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *it62Man
4 hours ago

leeds/Bradford


"As a WHU fan I am glad that this is finally out there. It has been known for years that he was a dodgy seedy old man. Perhaps now the club can move in a direction more suited to its tradition and loyal following rather than being used as a toy for this billionaire scoundrel.

I think that the evidence shown on Panorama is, at best vague and certainly historic.

If there was any actual evidence then this could have and should have been dealt with years ago.

My best guess is that nothing will come of the accusations, true or otherwise and Sullivan will use his financial wealth to demand an apology and likely get a court to uphold his claim of libel and add to his coffers.

The women may have been nieve and in search of fame, but what he is alleged to have done is wrong, if unsurprising.

I'm sure that there are numerous other women with similar claims against Sullivan and others like him.

It will rumble on until it runs out of steam.

For us fans of The Irons, Sullivan's exposure has rid the club of a foolish tyrant and we can hope, expect even, a brighter future.

You are missing a massive point. Panorama had to restrain themselves due to the watershed. Mainstream press, world renowned papers like The Times have an enormous amounts of alleged evidence that is still to be made public. Its a massive disgusting scandal.

Essex Police clearly corrupt aswell. Their investigations should be reviewed by independant assessors.

Rumble on? I dont think so. Snowball momentum....deffo."

You clearly have inside information....

There have been consistent rumours around The London Stadium and The Boleyn Ground for many years now, there is clearly more to it but it is likely to end with a fizz rather than a bang.

Sullivan has become the Jimmy Saville of football and has 'friends' as well as enormous financial clout.

Essex police may be inept or simply unable to pursue based on the limited evidence available.

Sure, the program was aired before the watershed, it was not going to bring out all the detail of the allegations but if there were details that were more explicit then the program could have been broadcast later.

The simple facts, as we know them currently, are that the allegations are historic, unpleasant and have only the substance of verbal accusation.

We can only await the next episode.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top