FabSwingers.com forum: Controversial and sensitive I know, but...

By *angled up in two OP Couple
15 weeks ago

West Mids

Were the Beatles really all that?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *hePerkyPumpkinTV/TS
15 weeks ago

Bristol

I'm not a huge Beatles fan.

But the writing partnership of Lennon and McCartney can't really be understated.

Something they absolutely lost when they weren't working together.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *iamondsmiles.Woman
15 weeks ago

SW1A1AA

I liked the early beatles when they sounded all "tinny" but nothing after about 1968

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
15 weeks ago

"Were the Beatles really all that? "

They did so many firsts. They changed the face of popular music and culture.

They were the first band to really use the studio as an instrument and pushed the very limited ( by today’s standards) equipment to places not thought possible.

There has been many, many very good bands since but none shall give to music what those 4 lads did.

194 songs in seven years and all before they hit 30.

Not everyone’s cup of tea but there’s a reason they are widely regarded as the best of all time.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *angled up in two OP Couple
15 weeks ago

West Mids

Accept all that but there's a school of thought that says they weren't very good musicians, thus there's not lot in the way of live recordings available.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *kibirdWoman
15 weeks ago

Gillingham ( Dorset, not Kent)

I think you have to see them in context of what music was like at the time and how they started a whole genre of their own. By today’s standards, no theyre probably not anything too amazing but they were groundbreaking at the time and brought something new to the scene

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *angled up in two OP Couple
15 weeks ago

West Mids

"I think you have to see them in context of what music was like at the time and how they started a whole genre of their own. By today’s standards, no theyre probably not anything too amazing but they were groundbreaking at the time and brought something new to the scene "

I thought Chuck Berry did that for them?

I need educating here.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *reya73Woman
15 weeks ago

Whitley Bay

There's a cute movie called 'yesterday' where the existence of the Beatles disappears due to some anomaly.

If you want to channel your dismay or allegiance.. have a watch. It's canny

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ancashireredheadWoman
15 weeks ago

Lancashire

Time for me to go to bed before i start my pro Beatles rant 😂

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
15 weeks ago

"Accept all that but there's a school of thought that says they weren't very good musicians, thus there's not lot in the way of live recordings available. "

Many do think that, but they in fact were very accomplished musicians just not in a classical sense. They didn’t have the discipline of say a member of an orchestra but that’s also where their creativity was born. They weren’t bound by arbitrary rules.

They were adept at changing time signatures and mixing different scales in single compositions, things that technically shouldn’t have worked but created timeless classics.

I’m obviously a fan but I can understand why people don’t particularly rate them.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *angled up in two OP Couple
15 weeks ago

West Mids

"There's a cute movie called 'yesterday' where the existence of the Beatles disappears due to some anomaly.

If you want to channel your dismay or allegiance.. have a watch. It's canny "

Have seen it. It's a good film, nothing too deep but very enjoyable.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *angled up in two OP Couple
15 weeks ago

West Mids

"Time for me to go to bed before i start my pro Beatles rant 😂"

I think you should speak your mind.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *he Flat CapsCouple
15 weeks ago

Pontypool

Nope.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ancashireredheadWoman
15 weeks ago

Lancashire

"Time for me to go to bed before i start my pro Beatles rant 😂

I think you should speak your mind. "

I’ll add my two pence worth tomorrow if I remember 😊

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *angled up in two OP Couple
15 weeks ago

West Mids

"Accept all that but there's a school of thought that says they weren't very good musicians, thus there's not lot in the way of live recordings available.

They were adept at changing time signatures and mixing different scales in single compositions, things that technically shouldn’t have worked but created timeless classics.

I’m obviously a fan but I can understand why people don’t particularly rate them.

I'm ambivalent, not judging them. George Martin had a lot to do with the above though.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *hePerkyPumpkinTV/TS
15 weeks ago

Bristol

I thought Chuck Berry did that for them?

I need educating here. "

Bill Haley - Rock Around the Clock is usually considered the advent of Rock n Roll I think.

The Beatles took inspiration from Rock n Roll, as well as some weird genres like Skiffle.

The Beatles were not hot-shot musicians. But they did everything they needed to do to serve the song.

And in comparison to the Spotify top 10 these days, Beatles music uses chord progressions/melodies/harmony in ways you simply don't find commonly in chart topping music anymore.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *echnosonic_BrummieMan
15 weeks ago

Willenhall

"I liked the early beatles when they sounded all "tinny" but nothing after about 1968"

The tinny sound was likely due to most of their albums being recorded in mono. Stereo recording of music albums only really started in the late 1960s.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *amantha_NiteTV/TS
15 weeks ago

The Lake District

"Were the Beatles really all that? "

Argh well,I use the theory that Kraftwerk are more important to music development and history than the Beatles,after all did John Lennon invent the piano or Paul McCartney the guitar? No.

Now Kraftwerk we're instrumental (pun intended) with the development of electronic instruments like the drum machine and synthesiser

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *angled up in two OP Couple
15 weeks ago

West Mids

"Were the Beatles really all that?

Argh well,I use the theory that Kraftwerk are more important to music development and history than the Beatles,after all did John Lennon invent the piano or Paul McCartney the guitar? No.

Now Kraftwerk we're instrumental (pun intended) with the development of electronic instruments like the drum machine and synthesiser "

I'm not arguing with this. It's a good point.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *umking3000Man
15 weeks ago

Portsmouth

I think if you appreciate music then you have to consider that the Beatles, outwith the well known tracks, actually did things totally different from what the norm was at the time.

You only need to deep dive sgt peppers to see that, with the changes in some of the songs that really wouldn’t be apart of the same song…..then you can bring in stuff from the white album, which is a lot more prog.

Not trying to be disrespectful, but I have found that people who claim the Beatles are overrated have only really listened to the ‘hits’

Might be a controversial option.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *appyhumper123Man
15 weeks ago

ayr

That and more

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *atiekisskissWoman
15 weeks ago

London

"Accept all that but there's a school of thought that says they weren't very good musicians, thus there's not lot in the way of live recordings available. "

Obviously a very stupid school. All were very good musicians!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
15 weeks ago

"Accept all that but there's a school of thought that says they weren't very good musicians, thus there's not lot in the way of live recordings available.

They were adept at changing time signatures and mixing different scales in single compositions, things that technically shouldn’t have worked but created timeless classics.

I’m obviously a fan but I can understand why people don’t particularly rate them.

I'm ambivalent, not judging them. George Martin had a lot to do with the above though.

Without a doubt George Martin helped them realise some of their ideas and as producers go he was just as ground breaking as the band.

If they didn’t have George in the booth I believe they couldn’t have done a lot of what they did

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *hePerkyPumpkinTV/TS
15 weeks ago

Bristol

"Accept all that but there's a school of thought that says they weren't very good musicians, thus there's not lot in the way of live recordings available.

Obviously a very stupid school. All were very good musicians!"

They were good at what they did...

None of them were particularly accomplished on their chosen instrument.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *angled up in two OP Couple
15 weeks ago

West Mids

The only live footage available seems to be them playing their earlier stuff. Could they actually play the music the Martin helped them make? The popular conception is that they stopped performing because the teenage girls' screaming made it impossible. Some say that's a cop out. I guess we'll never know.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *hePerkyPumpkinTV/TS
15 weeks ago

Bristol

"The only live footage available seems to be them playing their earlier stuff. Could they actually play the music the Martin helped them make? The popular conception is that they stopped performing because the teenage girls' screaming made it impossible. Some say that's a cop out. I guess we'll never know. "

Things like Sgt Peppers was created without the intention of being played/recreated live...

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *angled up in two OP Couple
15 weeks ago

West Mids

Because they weren't capable?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
15 weeks ago

They stuff they made in the studio from 66 onwards was possible live in those days.

They tired of touring after years of jetting round the world and only seeing inside hotel rooms.

The venues they played weren’t music venues at the end and the music was played through stadium PA systems, that coupled with the hysteria made playing almost impossible.

The Che stadium gig you can see John Lennon playing keyboard with his elbows because he couldn’t hear a thing

If you look up some early gigs they were extremely tight after years in Hamburg playing 8 hours a night

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
15 weeks ago

Wasn’t possible**

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *hePerkyPumpkinTV/TS
15 weeks ago

Bristol

"Because they weren't capable?"

Some things are simply beyond a four piece band.

Listen to A Day in the Life and think about recreating it in a live environment back in the 60s

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *teve197_ukMan
15 weeks ago

Sutton Coldfield

Yes they bloody were .

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *effdelightMan
15 weeks ago

Grimsby

I used to think they were shit.

Then I woke up 🤣

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *angled up in two OP Couple
15 weeks ago

West Mids

They tired of touring after years of jetting round the world and only seeing inside hotel rooms.

Their tours are listed on Wiki (not the bastion of truth & accuracy, I know). They didn't seem to tour anywhere near as much as some bands.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *umking3000Man
15 weeks ago

Portsmouth

"Accept all that but there's a school of thought that says they weren't very good musicians, thus there's not lot in the way of live recordings available.

Obviously a very stupid school. All were very good musicians!

They were good at what they did...

None of them were particularly accomplished on their chosen instrument."

I take the point that there isn’t 5 min guitar solos etc….but they were definitely accomplished on their instruments.

Early days playing 3 chords with a drum beat I can understand….but by the time it was almost over that cannot be a truthful claim

BTW….im not even a Beatles fan tbh, but you have to appreciate what they did.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
15 weeks ago

[Removed by poster at 28/02/26 00:47:32]

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
15 weeks ago

"There's a cute movie called 'yesterday' where the existence of the Beatles disappears due to some anomaly.

If you want to channel your dismay or allegiance.. have a watch. It's canny "

Yep - that is a lovely little film.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
15 weeks ago

Maybe not but they tired of it and they had the luxury of being able to be a studio band.

When they ceased touring and started experimenting is when things really changed.

Are they all that? I think so and music wouldn’t be the same without them that’s for sure

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
15 weeks ago

They had a lot of hits / good songs, and a fair amount of dross too, but to anyone who doesn’t rate them I’d say go listen to While My Guitar Gently Weeps….

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *hePerkyPumpkinTV/TS
15 weeks ago

Bristol

"Accept all that but there's a school of thought that says they weren't very good musicians, thus there's not lot in the way of live recordings available.

Obviously a very stupid school. All were very good musicians!

They were good at what they did...

None of them were particularly accomplished on their chosen instrument.

I take the point that there isn’t 5 min guitar solos etc….but they were definitely accomplished on their instruments.

Early days playing 3 chords with a drum beat I can understand….but by the time it was almost over that cannot be a truthful claim

BTW….im not even a Beatles fan tbh, but you have to appreciate what they did."

Compare them to Oscar Peterson or Buddy Rich or Robert Fripp or Ruth Underwood...

As I said, they were good at what they did... And they were good.

But none of them were wildy impressive

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *angled up in two OP Couple
15 weeks ago

West Mids

So, to conclude, great together but nothing notable apart, average artists pulled together by a good manager and great producer. The whole was greater than the sum of its parts?

Pretty much the Wimbledon FC of the '60s music scene. Fair assumption?

That seems to be what everyone is saying?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *hePerkyPumpkinTV/TS
15 weeks ago

Bristol

"So, to conclude, great together but nothing notable apart, average artists pulled together by a good manager and great producer. The whole was greater than the sum of its parts?

Pretty much the Wimbledon FC of the '60s music scene. Fair assumption?

That seems to be what everyone is saying? "

I would agree with that summation yes.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *angled up in two OP Couple
15 weeks ago

West Mids

"So, to conclude, great together but nothing notable apart, average artists pulled together by a good manager and great producer. The whole was greater than the sum of its parts?

Pretty much the Wimbledon FC of the '60s music scene. Fair assumption?

That seems to be what everyone is saying?

I would agree with that summation yes."

I don't think Wimbledon were very good live either.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *kguy4444Man
15 weeks ago

Wales

The more I listen and learn, the more I appreciate atie. Experimental, broke new grounds, did things not even though of, trail blazers, immense back catalogue, culture changing. Some of thier records would like they could have been written today. The fact they are so talked about 60 years later is a phenomenon. Never see it again.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
15 weeks ago

"So, to conclude, great together but nothing notable apart, average artists pulled together by a good manager and great producer. The whole was greater than the sum of its parts?

Pretty much the Wimbledon FC of the '60s music scene. Fair assumption?

That seems to be what everyone is saying? "

That’s fair, greater than the sum of its parts is the perfect way to describe it for me

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *kguy4444Man
15 weeks ago

Wales

Saw Paul in concert 10 years ago when he was in his 70s, three hours non stop hits, no break. Unreal.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *hePerkyPumpkinTV/TS
15 weeks ago

Bristol

"So, to conclude, great together but nothing notable apart, average artists pulled together by a good manager and great producer. The whole was greater than the sum of its parts?

Pretty much the Wimbledon FC of the '60s music scene. Fair assumption?

That seems to be what everyone is saying?

I would agree with that summation yes.

I don't think Wimbledon were very good live either. "

I don't know... I don't watch Tennis, and if they're a band I've never heard of them 😂

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *angled up in two OP Couple
15 weeks ago

West Mids

"Saw Paul in concert 10 years ago when he was in his 70s, three hours non stop hits, no break. Unreal."

I saw him some years ago when Linda was still alive. He was terrible, as we're the reviews for the gig. Maybe an off night.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *pthillMan
15 weeks ago

st shithole

"Were the Beatles really all that? "

Yes ,, they actually were

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
15 weeks ago

"Were the Beatles really all that? "

Massively overrated imo.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
15 weeks ago

I dont think its the music, its what that genre stood for. When music was pure, natural and you had to have a little talent to have an impact on the world.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
15 weeks ago

Love Sargent peppers lonely heart club band.

Great lp

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *hief_Of_AlwaysMan
15 weeks ago

1313 Mockingbird Lane…

Not a fan personally.

They don’t have many bops.

But I acknowledge their musical importance.

Remove them from the timeline & music as we know it would be very different.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
15 weeks ago

Anyone on here actually alive in the 60's? 😃

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *onin25Man
15 weeks ago

Durham

The Beatles are one of several artists without whom music could be very different today, hugely important and influencial, but there are other artists who you can make the same argument for.

Whether or not you think they were good is a matter of individual taste. I like them, particularly from Rubber Soul onwards.

They were all good musicians, but none of them virtuosos, but personally I'd rather listen to a good rhythm guitarist play good tunes than a Joe Satriani style guitar noodlist showing off.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *vaRoseWoman
15 weeks ago

Ankh-Morpork

Without trying to step on toes and knowing full well this will cause people to get upset

I’ve always thought they were a bit shit. As writers, great… but as a band? Nah.

I recognise all of their achievements and I don’t need a list of what they’ve done… I grew up in a Beatles household. I still think they’re overrated, and a bit shit.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *lynJMan
15 weeks ago

Morden

There is footage on YouTube of the rooftop concert they performed in January 1969. Footage is also used in the film "Let It Be", and other documentaries.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *rightonsteveMan
15 weeks ago

Hove, mainly…

I think they were remarkably good especially their later stuff. Compare the production quality, imagination and lyrics as well as the music to what a lot of contemporaries were churning out.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *udandBryanCouple
15 weeks ago

Boston

We've never been fans, too mainstream for us - though they probably weren't at the time...

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
15 weeks ago

I still think they are underrated. There's really no one in the whole of popular music that comes close to them for innovation and quality, especially over such a concentrated period. In 7 years as a recording group they took music and culture in new directions multiple times, while releasing album after album of quite brilliant songs.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ost SockMan
15 weeks ago

West Wales and Cardiff

I don’t listen to them often, but they were brilliant.

They weren’t flashy musicians, but they used their instruments to craft some of the most special songs in popular music.

If you understand how songs are constructed, particulary their use of interesting harmonies, they were way ahead of everyone except Brian Wilson, Burt Bacharah, Jimmy Webb etc.

There are so many little moments of compostional genius in their songs. An example would be the chorus of Penny Lane modulating down a semitone, yet it sounds exultant. Who modulates down to get that effect?! The wonderdul modulations of Here, There and Everywhere is another example.

McCartney was also a beast of a bass player and don’t believe the nonsense about Ringo Starr. Have a look on YouTube at the drummers who rate him.

None of that means people have to like them, and there’s plenty of their stuff that passes me by. They were pretty extraordinary songwriters in their field, though.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
15 weeks ago

I also think there's a big difference between not liking or enjoying their music, and saying they were 'shit'. I imagine many people have been bored silly watching Shakespeare, but it really doesn't mean his writing is shit.🤣

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *he MinionMan
15 weeks ago

Surrey

I can appreciate the change that they created in the whkle music industry. The shift in musical style, Beatlemania all of that. It was a phenominon unseen before especially in the UK.

But I'm not overly keen on the music. Some, sure but generally, not really.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *lder budweiserMan
15 weeks ago

Stirlingshire

"I also think there's a big difference between not liking or enjoying their music, and saying they were 'shit'. I imagine many people have been bored silly watching Shakespeare, but it really doesn't mean his writing is shit.🤣"

Yeah, but folk like to be 'edgy'

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
15 weeks ago

"Accept all that but there's a school of thought that says they weren't very good musicians, thus there's not lot in the way of live recordings available. "

Not sure which school that is but I hope Ofsted have been informed.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
15 weeks ago

People will always have opinions but it's like Taylor swift she's not for me at all but you can't argue that millions of people love her stuff clearly these people are very famous for a reason

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *addy TypeMan
15 weeks ago

liverpool

I think the stones were a better act .

But Lennon & Macca did launch Mick and Co by writing "I wana be your man" the bands first hit .

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
15 weeks ago

They where in their moment in time, especially early pop songs. But not to be worshipped now. They started a phase of music with their success, but then music evolves. Still better than Oasis though by a huge margin

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *kphooey43Man
15 weeks ago

Barnet

"Were the Beatles really all that? "

Let it be was ok.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

Post new Message to Thread