FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

New Browser Selections !!!!!

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Firstly this is a new slant on a topic we often discuss here - but bare with me here ok .....

I have had recent batch of what seemed to be "single and swingers cpl's" contact me, only for me to discover that when offered to meet they where in fact

"married/playing away"

So my questions are;

1. Do you think there should be a - Single/Married/Attached selection in your "personal details" ?

2. Should there be a - Experienced/Casual/Novice Swinger selection in your account settings?

I will run a survey until FRIDAY 14th June and post results here;

ANSWER AS FOLLOWS Please

Q1 = Yes or No

Q2 = Yes or No

Depending on your response - and providing its not blocked by admin - I propose alteration to them

Thanks

Jon x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *cottishrichMan
over a year ago

Here and there

No and No.

People are always going to be economical with the truth, it's your job to appropriately vet the profiles that interest you, not introduce more opportunities for people to lie on their profile.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No and no.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"No and No.

People are always going to be economical with the truth, it's your job to appropriately vet the profiles that interest you, not introduce more opportunities for people to lie on their profile. "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ENGUYMan
over a year ago

Hull


"No and No.

People are always going to be economical with the truth, it's your job to appropriately vet the profiles that interest you, not introduce more opportunities for people to lie on their profile.

"

Well, your responses are flooding in I can see!

At this rate, you'll be able to tot up the votes on the finger of both hands!

Also count me in as "No and No"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"No and No.

People are always going to be economical with the truth, it's your job to appropriately vet the profiles that interest you, not introduce more opportunities for people to lie on their profile. "

This thread is an atempt at adressing the odd quirks the site as and after all- it might go nowhere ok

But if your telling that in all the time you have arrange meetings that every one you turned up they/he/she was exactly what "they said on the tin" lol ??? if yes i take my hat off to you sir, cus i been swinging here and elsewhere for near on 9 years now and even i been caught out a few time - including last week

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No to Q1, and definitely No to Q2.

The more you do this, the more people will 'bend' the truth, and with no 2, I can see a lot of people being exploited/targetted for nefarious reasons - specially newbies.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No

and

No

The site already provides us with an adequate option to use our profile to give an accurate and honest descriptions of what we offer and expect as potential swinging partners...

Having extra tick box selections just encourages more people to opt out of making suitable effort with their profile and devalues the whole purpose of using profile based contact sites in the first place..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Two No's from us.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Q1 = No

Q2 = No

"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"No to Q1, and definitely No to Q2.

The more you do this, the more people will 'bend' the truth, and with no 2, I can see a lot of people being exploited/targetted for nefarious reasons - specially newbies.

"

Ah but do you not see this a way of better exposing those stupid timewasters even more ??????

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"No to Q1, and definitely No to Q2.

The more you do this, the more people will 'bend' the truth, and with no 2, I can see a lot of people being exploited/targetted for nefarious reasons - specially newbies.

Ah but do you not see this a way of better exposing those stupid timewasters even more ?????? "

No

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"No

and

No

The site already provides us with an adequate option to use our profile to give an accurate and honest descriptions of what we offer and expect as potential swinging partners...

Having extra tick box selections just encourages more people to opt out of making suitable effort with their profile and devalues the whole purpose of using profile based contact sites in the first place..

"

Soxy i totally and utterely agree with your view re profiles - however if i read someones profile screen gave me information i think i would use this to my advantage

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"No to Q1, and definitely No to Q2.

The more you do this, the more people will 'bend' the truth, and with no 2, I can see a lot of people being exploited/targetted for nefarious reasons - specially newbies.

Ah but do you not see this a way of better exposing those stupid timewasters even more ?????? "

That depends on your definition of a 'time waster', doesn't it? To me, it's only someone who doesn't turn up after arranging a meet, not someone who chats for ages then goes quiet or disappears. Neither of your two proposed selections would guard against that, and I can't think of a way you could ever do that?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Well I am quiet happy to bow to peoples judgments and i am sure this thread will die a death - which is absolutely fine - i will still post results and end of week

Jon

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

q1 yes

q2 why as we have the amount of time folk have been on and how many verifs they have

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Well I am quiet happy to bow to peoples judgments and i am sure this thread will die a death - which is absolutely fine - i will still post results and end of week

Jon "

At least you've come up with some ideas for further developments to the browsing system, and been prepared to post them well and open them up to discussion. Plenty just whinge about it and never come up with a decent suggestion themselves.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Q1 = Don't care

Q2 = Don't care

Bigger and better things to worry about I'm afraid

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No and no

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top