FabSwingers.com forum: Cash for Questions and Expenses

By *icketysplits OP Woman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound

You'd think they would check the company bona fides on Google!

I was a bit shocked to hear that IPSA costs £7m a year. It would be less expensive to let them all keep on fiddling their expenses.

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"You'd think they would check the company bona fides on Google!

I was a bit shocked to hear that IPSA costs £7m a year. It would be less expensive to let them all keep on fiddling their expenses."

You are joking of course ???

That lot would be claiming billions if not kept an eye on.

By *icketysplits OP Woman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound

"You'd think they would check the company bona fides on Google!

I was a bit shocked to hear that IPSA costs £7m a year. It would be less expensive to let them all keep on fiddling their expenses.

You are joking of course ???

That lot would be claiming billions if not kept an eye on."

The last scandal didn't add up to anywhere near £7m a year. The head of IPSA is paid £90k, which is more than an MP gets. I want to see them cleaned up but at £7m it's disproportionate and not even doing a good job.

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The last person to enter the houses of Parliament with honest intentions was Guy Fawkes.

That lot would sell everything and claim it all back on expenses.

They want £1.5 billion to refit the the place so says it all really