Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The old 'nature/nurture' debate has been around forever, and we still don't really know any answers " Yeah I guess we aren't any closer although I'm tipped over to the nurture side of coin when you look at the research on the brain development of neglected babies and the impact of not having their basic care needs met!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The old 'nature/nurture' debate has been around forever, and we still don't really know any answers Yeah I guess we aren't any closer although I'm tipped over to the nurture side of coin when you look at the research on the brain development of neglected babies and the impact of not having their basic care needs met!! There was a huge study on twins some years ago, can't remember who did it. The research blew the nuture theory as it studied twins that were seperated and raised by different families, cultures, socioeconomic status etc, in the 1950's. " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think it can be both. Some people are born that way and for some it's life that makes them that way. The same set of circumstances won't necessarily turn everyone bad though. Some people use negative experiences in a positive way." This ^ | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Think it comes down to the way our brains are wired and experiences when growing up. Most psychopaths are successful businessmen/women. All a psychopath is in its simplest from is someone who has not got the little voice in their head telling them they are/were wrong and are goal driven and can easily pretend that they care or feel guilt to get their own way. A sociopath is someone who as a problem with personal space and mixing with other people an easy way to spot one is and we all have is they are the ones who when in a busy pub will say to you what are you looking at or are you looking at my girl or you meant to bump into me when plainly you were not ie can attack you for these reasons but will suffer guilt afterward. A sadist is someone who enjoys inflicting pain on others for their own enjoyment but also feels guilt.However bad these people can be in there own right it's when we get a mix of these traits that we will have someone that we would call truly evil the worst being a sadistic socio psychopath someone that nobody wants to meet ...." OMG! That's me to tea! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The old 'nature/nurture' debate has been around forever, and we still don't really know any answers Yeah I guess we aren't any closer although I'm tipped over to the nurture side of coin when you look at the research on the brain development of neglected babies and the impact of not having their basic care needs met!! There was a huge study on twins some years ago, can't remember who did it. The research blew the nuture theory as it studied twins that were seperated and raised by different families, cultures, socioeconomic status etc, in the 1950's. " That's a very different scenario I am well aware of that piece of research and it still doesnt blow away the nature/nuture debate as regardless of separation or differences being raised they were all raised with their basic care needs being met. I'm talking about severely neglected babies who arent nutured at all, don't have their basic needs met, who aren't fed or cared for and who have very little or no positive adult interaction. Research has shown that their brains develop differently to a child who's needs are met and that the damage is irreversible!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Re: OP -- I do think there is objective evil, and most moral philosophies agree that there are situations and actions which would be universally evil, no matter what the culture. For example, genocide. " Nope sorry even genocide is not considered evil by those carrying it out, almost all "civilised" nations have carried out some form of mass killing of a perceived enemy in the last 200 years. They will have reasons, real or not for justifying the action at the time. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Think it comes down to the way our brains are wired and experiences when growing up. Most psychopaths are successful businessmen/women. All a psychopath is in its simplest from is someone who has not got the little voice in their head telling them they are/were wrong and are goal driven and can easily pretend that they care or feel guilt to get their own way. A sociopath is someone who as a problem with personal space and mixing with other people an easy way to spot one is and we all have is they are the ones who when in a busy pub will say to you what are you looking at or are you looking at my girl or you meant to bump into me when plainly you were not ie can attack you for these reasons but will suffer guilt afterward. A sadist is someone who enjoys inflicting pain on others for their own enjoyment but also feels guilt.However bad these people can be in there own right it's when we get a mix of these traits that we will have someone that we would call truly evil the worst being a sadistic socio psychopath someone that nobody wants to meet ...." I was under the impression that 'sociopathic personality' was a term introduce to replace 'psychopathic personality' because it more clearly expressed the social aspects of the disorder (and because the term psychopathic had suffered so much lexical abuse in other contexts)... and then more recently superseded by 'antisocial personality disorder'. All three terms are one and the same condition. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |