Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
![]() | Back to forum list |
![]() | Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest | ![]() |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Would depend on the person, location and availability also..." Indeed, I guess the person part is most important - so you can trust them on location and availability. It does take more effort to keep up the greater the time, so I salute people who're able to do that successfully a lot. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I have no hard and fast rules. I'm mostly an instinctual person. If it feels good , do it. If it doesn't feel right leave it alone. " You mean intuition not instinct don’t you , unless you subconsciously plan to eat them ? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What is the Goldilocks zone for you in terms of time spent / number of messages exchanged before you meet someone who interests you off here? Assume this is someone you've never seen before in another setting like a group social, so you're only going by virtual interactions. This is something I had been wondering - my hypothesis is there's a sweet spot for everyone although knowing what it is can be difficult. I'm trying to figure out if there's some underlying pattern that applies to most people. If there's a lot of back and forth, do you gradually lose interest or think they're wasting your time? Conversely, if someone asks to meet too soon after you've started talking, does that put you off?" We go from one message saying we are interested to setting a time and place to meet for a social drink and chat. If this social can't be arranged within a few weeks, we ask them to contact us again when they are free and forget about them. We have found through experience people who won't commit to a social are very unlikely to meet up for anything else. Then take into account the massive number of timewasters it's easier just to move on. Again, we can only speak from our experience and find the more messages or emails, the less likelihood of a meet. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What is the Goldilocks zone for you in terms of time spent / number of messages exchanged before you meet someone who interests you off here? Assume this is someone you've never seen before in another setting like a group social, so you're only going by virtual interactions. This is something I had been wondering - my hypothesis is there's a sweet spot for everyone although knowing what it is can be difficult. I'm trying to figure out if there's some underlying pattern that applies to most people. If there's a lot of back and forth, do you gradually lose interest or think they're wasting your time? Conversely, if someone asks to meet too soon after you've started talking, does that put you off? We go from one message saying we are interested to setting a time and place to meet for a social drink and chat. If this social can't be arranged within a few weeks, we ask them to contact us again when they are free and forget about them. We have found through experience people who won't commit to a social are very unlikely to meet up for anything else. Then take into account the massive number of timewasters it's easier just to move on. Again, we can only speak from our experience and find the more messages or emails, the less likelihood of a meet. " This is the way we approach it on our couples profile. We like a few back and forth messages initially. It helps identify those who really want to know a bit about you and the that just want to get their rocks off with anyone they can find. We did have a recent message exchange which was going great until he dropped into conversation several messages in that he was actually married and she didn't know he was on Fab. Killed things dead for us, but would have been a worse outcome if he'd left it to tell us at a social meet, or worse, after we'd actually all got naked. We're never in a rush to arrange anything on here. We go to enough clubs to enable semi-spontaneous fun with others, but even then we'll chat at the bar or in the vape area first. Instant requests to meet go straight in the bin, no matter who they're from. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don’t have one. I can busy, they can be busy, distance can be a huge factor. Like Littlebird, I tend to make friends, just so happens that I occasionally have sex with some of them 😍" ^^ sex person ♥️ | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"^^ sex person ♥️" Sex people! ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top | ![]() |