FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

A serious question for the guys

Jump to newest
 

By *iamondsmiles. OP   Woman
7 weeks ago

little house on the praire

I'm being serious for once and I really am interested.

Would you judge a woman on her sexual past if so why. I won't judge anyone for their reply but I'm genuinely interested

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *anielpiercedMan
7 weeks ago

X

Nope, past is past has no relevance to the present in my opinion.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *eo PublicMan
7 weeks ago

Lincoln

No, I know there is still the attitude out there that a girl who has slept around is a slag, but a bloke is Jack the lad. I honestly don't care what a partners sexual history is, mines not the best, it's the now that's important.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *cflirtyMan
7 weeks ago

Hants border

I reckon someone's past is just that!

Live in the moment xx

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *imbob2025300Man
7 weeks ago

Grantham

No, in fact would enjoy the stories

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *entlemanH666Man
7 weeks ago

Here, there….

I really appreciate when someone trusts me to share that information.

No judgment but intrigue

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *YDB75Man
7 weeks ago

Beverley

I try not to judge anybody and dont go searching for answers to questions.

We are a different person to the one we was yesterday and that cant be changed or erased. So why focus on what has gone before

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *avie65Man
7 weeks ago

In the west.

Gawd no. I’d have a cheek if I did.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *lascumMan
7 weeks ago

Glasgow

Nope, why should I, everyone is entitled to play.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ellhungvweMan
7 weeks ago

Cheltenham

Not at all. I wouldn’t judge anyone.

If someone had a proclivity for bareback then they are probably not for me but I wouldn’t think any the worse of them.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ose-tinted GlassesMan
7 weeks ago

Glasgow / London

If you push her away, you’ll spend every day from then chasing Amy, so to speak.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ealitybitesMan
7 weeks ago

Belfast

I would never judge them but it may mean we aren't compatible because I'm only looking for those on a similar journey to mine which involves a very limited history.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *teveinYorkMan
7 weeks ago

Pocklington

Not at all: interested, yes but that's all.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *reyToTheFairiesWoman
7 weeks ago

Carlisle usually

I think the majority are smart enough not to burn their bridges by publicly stating in the place they're looking for casual sex with women that they look down on women who have casual sex.

There's plenty who do 💜

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *eoBloomsMan
7 weeks ago

Springfield

That would depend on what the past was.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *moothdickMan
7 weeks ago

stoke

No, honestly is the main point…. Someone’s past could be a turn on… has long as it’s not used to hurt someone, get in the moment

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *iamondsmiles. OP   Woman
7 weeks ago

little house on the praire

Welll this is interesting. I say things on the forum and even mentioned a couple of times how many I've roughly slept with . Most of the guys I've met from fab haven't used the forums and I haven't said anything to them as quite frankly its none of there business I've had a colourful past and don't think.i should be judged on it.

The only person that 100^ knew my sexually history was my late partner and I never had to explain anything to him he just got me

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ildbillkidMan
7 weeks ago

where the road goes on forever

Maybe judging who she was with,

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *imbob2025300Man
7 weeks ago

Grantham


"Welll this is interesting. I say things on the forum and even mentioned a couple of times how many I've roughly slept with . Most of the guys I've met from fab haven't used the forums and I haven't said anything to them as quite frankly its none of there business I've had a colourful past and don't think.i should be judged on it.

The only person that 100^ knew my sexually history was my late partner and I never had to explain anything to him he just got me"

I had the same with my late partner

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *michael88Man
7 weeks ago

crewe

Not bothered in the slightest tbh

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *Wguy456Man
7 weeks ago

South Coast

I enjoy chatting about our sexually past with partners etc.

No need to judge, everyone is different

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *exxyyDy11Man
7 weeks ago

North West

No because if I passed judgement, I'd be hypocritical.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *eoBloomsMan
7 weeks ago

Springfield

I do judge people more than Rob Rinder tbf.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *otguy555Man
7 weeks ago

Bristol

Definitely not judge

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ilffadMan
7 weeks ago

swansea

Not really, we all have pasts

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *rickie-dickieMan
7 weeks ago

South Durham

No, it's not my business. I like to know what people like doing and having done to them. Male or female.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *iamondsmiles. OP   Woman
7 weeks ago

little house on the praire


"I do judge people more than Rob Rinder tbf."
why do you judge people and what on

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *eltCuteMightDeleteWoman
7 weeks ago

Reading

I’ve been judged by people on fab. I’m not sure it’s a thing that would be admitted if it was happening.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oldAndBoundlessMan
7 weeks ago

Bradford

Yes and no

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *aveyougotmymarblesMan
7 weeks ago

3rd rock from the sun

Don't care

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *uracell_abs_ukMan
7 weeks ago

Wirksworth

I get some ladies say I have too many verifications.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *eoBloomsMan
7 weeks ago

Springfield


"I do judge people more than Rob Rinder tbf.why do you judge people and what on"

I think most people judge others, whether they admit it or not, its a normal part of how we form an opinion on other people. Judging doesn't mean I think they're a good or bad person, just that their behavior might not be compatible with mine. I have absolutely no problem being judged either.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ave1976XXXMan
7 weeks ago

newmarket

I don’t judge anyone ever. Past is the past and now is now!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *iamondsmiles. OP   Woman
7 weeks ago

little house on the praire


"I would never judge them but it may mean we aren't compatible because I'm only looking for those on a similar journey to mine which involves a very limited history. "
perfect answer. where all compatible things, I hope that is what our bio is for. Surely the aim of our experience those we are compatible with

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ouple4fun40Couple
7 weeks ago

brigg


"I'm being serious for once and I really am interested.

Would you judge a woman on her sexual past if so why. I won't judge anyone for their reply but I'm genuinely interested"

no in fact I enjoyed hearing about what she done

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *eroLondonMan
7 weeks ago

Mayfair

No, I wouldn't judge them whatsoever.

Their historical promiscuity would tell me that perhaps they are not compatible with me or we don't align.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *iamondsmiles. OP   Woman
7 weeks ago

little house on the praire


"No, I wouldn't judge them whatsoever.

Their historical promiscuity would tell me that perhaps they are not compatible with me or we don't align."

I respect that but how would you know someone's sexual someone's sexual history

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *mithy63Man
7 weeks ago

Ipswich

Never, life is for living, who am I to judge anyone. (as long as its legal obvs)

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ocketman81Man
7 weeks ago

Ennis

Not at all, if you keep looking at what's behind you you'll fall over what's in front of you.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *eroLondonMan
7 weeks ago

Mayfair


"No, I wouldn't judge them whatsoever.

Their historical promiscuity would tell me that perhaps they are not compatible with me or we don't align.

·

I respect that but how would you know someone's sexual history"

Because they would have told me or it would be common knowledge...which gives credence to the whole notion of whether I would judge or not.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *outhern77Man
7 weeks ago

Birmingham


"I'm being serious for once and I really am interested.

Would you judge a woman on her sexual past if so why. I won't judge anyone for their reply but I'm genuinely interested"

Nope, what's in the past is in the past and has no bearing on the here and now

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *heffstarMan
7 weeks ago

Sheffield

defiantly not

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *eltCuteMightDeleteWoman
7 weeks ago

Reading

Common knowledge!!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *opeycool100Man
7 weeks ago

Morley

No after all that's why we are here after all.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
7 weeks ago

I think the more insecure you are the more it better. The younger I was, the more it mattered. The older and confident I became the less important it became. Hope that helps.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *lack FridayMan
7 weeks ago

Galway

If a lady is honest enough to tell me about her sexual past, or any past for that matter, then I would actually have more respect for her for telling me.

What I wouldn't like, especially if we were in some form of a relationship, whether Fab it otherwise is a nasty surprise.

Honesty upfront is always best and that works for both partners

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *anilla_SundaeCouple
7 weeks ago

Aberdeen

No, everyone has a past, so who am I to judge, nor they to judge me.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ilsaGeorgeCouple
7 weeks ago

kent

I’m too busy trying to live my own life to worry about how other people live theirs, and judging someone you met on a swinging site for having a sexually active past is… odd.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *erdyEstLdner 82Man
7 weeks ago

Ilford

In my opinion it is a waste of time asking someone about their sexual history, 9 times out of 10 the answer you'll get will probably be a lie. Why should you feel insecure about people your partner isn't fucking anymore? Also you shouldn't ask a question that you probably wouldn't want to answer yourself. Just enjoy the person in front of you and leave the past where it belongs.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ebauchayMan
7 weeks ago

swindon south


"I'm being serious for once and I really am interested.

Would you judge a woman on her sexual past if so why. I won't judge anyone for their reply but I'm genuinely interested"

Christ no. Far too much judgemental crap in this world. If you elect to be on this site then such attitudes are not only probably inappropriate but also hypocritical

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *gent CoulsonMan
7 weeks ago

Secret hideaway in the pennines

We all have a past, so definitely not

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *isskxxyvWoman
7 weeks ago

Reading


"I’m too busy trying to live my own life to worry about how other people live theirs, and judging someone you met on a swinging site for having a sexually active past is… odd. "

Precisely. It’s not as if you met at church on a Sunday!🤣

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ripfillMan
7 weeks ago

Paris, New York, Hong Kong and Havant

Hell NO. Absolutely not OP

what went on before is a personal issue and frankly is her business … if there is a need to share then do for health reasons or something else to offer an insight to other issues then great but it’s not important unless she needs to bring it up

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ackformore100Man
7 weeks ago

Tin town


"I'm being serious for once and I really am interested.

Would you judge a woman on her sexual past if so why. I won't judge anyone for their reply but I'm genuinely interested"

Depends what you mean by judge? They are presumably complete strangers so you can't really "judge" anyone but as far as is it information that helps you choose whether you'd like to meet and get to know them, yes it probably plays a part..nothing happens in isolation and without consequence.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ilsaGeorgeCouple
7 weeks ago

kent


"I’m too busy trying to live my own life to worry about how other people live theirs, and judging someone you met on a swinging site for having a sexually active past is… odd.

Precisely. It’s not as if you met at church on a Sunday!🤣"

I bet you look so pious in your Sunday best 😇

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *mileyculturebelfastMan
7 weeks ago

belfast

No I wouldn't. Absolutely nothing to do with me or anyone else.

Though these days those incel rats are trying to turn young men against women and sexual history is one of the things they use.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *olo180Man
7 weeks ago

West London


"I'm being serious for once and I really am interested.

Would you judge a woman on her sexual past if so why. I won't judge anyone for their reply but I'm genuinely interested"

Generally wouldn’t concern me. All I would be bothered about is how myself and the person are interacting. Everything else is irrelevant x

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *mileyculturebelfastMan
7 weeks ago

belfast


"I think the majority are smart enough not to burn their bridges by publicly stating in the place they're looking for casual sex with women that they look down on women who have casual sex.

There's plenty who do 💜"

There definitely is. They'll have women they'll quite happily fuck but wouldn't have a relationship with. It's disgusting.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *mileyculturebelfastMan
7 weeks ago

belfast


"Maybe judging who she was with, "

Why?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *reyToTheFairiesWoman
7 weeks ago

Carlisle usually


"Maybe judging who she was with,

Why?"

Hell I still judge me for some bad decisions in the past.

Definitely demonstrated a lack of critical thinking or reasonable risk assesment 💜

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *r.ZeusMan
7 weeks ago

london

No the past is the past. Events that have already happened cannot be changed and it’s a reminder to focus on the present

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *bi HaiveMan
Forum Mod

7 weeks ago

Cheeseville, Somerset


"I'm being serious for once and I really am interested.

Would you judge a woman on her sexual past if so why. I won't judge anyone for their reply but I'm genuinely interested"

Judge? No. People are free to do as they please.

Potentially use it as a factor in whether I choose to engage with them or not? Of course. But that's not judgement. That's just me making an informed decision. 🤷‍♂️

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *olo180Man
7 weeks ago

West London


"I think the majority are smart enough not to burn their bridges by publicly stating in the place they're looking for casual sex with women that they look down on women who have casual sex.

There's plenty who do 💜

There definitely is. They'll have women they'll quite happily fuck but wouldn't have a relationship with. It's disgusting. "

Why is it disgusting that a guy may want to fuck someone but not have a relationship with them?

This is a sex and swinging site not bumble!

There’s more facets to a choosing a relationship with someone than whether you want to fuck them or not!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ynamicnatureMan
7 weeks ago

Doncaster


"I'm being serious for once and I really am interested.

Would you judge a woman on her sexual past if so why. I won't judge anyone for their reply but I'm genuinely interested"

Absolutely not op,

We all get one shot at life, so why anyone should be made to feel guilty about what they get up too is beyond me.

As long as you're not hurting anyone, go for I say,❤️🌈

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *lue collar bi guyMan
7 weeks ago

the shire


"I think the majority are smart enough not to burn their bridges by publicly stating in the place they're looking for casual sex with women that they look down on women who have casual sex.

There's plenty who do 💜"

I concur with this statement.

I do however feel that if you are asking a partner how many people they have slept with. Then you clearly care about the answer.

It is i feel no-ones business and shouldn't be relevant unless it does matter to some extent to you.

All that said. I wouldn't go near Bonnie blue with a borrowed cock. Lol

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *reyToTheFairiesWoman
7 weeks ago

Carlisle usually


"I think the majority are smart enough not to burn their bridges by publicly stating in the place they're looking for casual sex with women that they look down on women who have casual sex.

There's plenty who do 💜

There definitely is. They'll have women they'll quite happily fuck but wouldn't have a relationship with. It's disgusting.

Why is it disgusting that a guy may want to fuck someone but not have a relationship with them?

This is a sex and swinging site not bumble!

There’s more facets to a choosing a relationship with someone than whether you want to fuck them or not! "

It's not a statement about having fuck buddies. Sexual chemistry without romantic attachment is if course fine in itself.

It's the actively looking down on people for doing the thing you're doing that's the issue 💜

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *heekyDannyMan
7 weeks ago

North West

No, it’s none of our business. We all have a sexual past and it doesn’t define us.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *isfits behaving badlyCouple
7 weeks ago

Coventry

Never have done and hope they never judge me by mine.

I take people as I find them and have no insecurities from their sexual past. I care not how they've expressed themselves sexually in the past or present or begrudge them the adventures and experiences they've explored and enjoyed. I want to be freed and loved for who I am, why wouldn't want the same for others?

I'm more likely to judge a woman on her history of how she's treated others mind.

Mr Misfit

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *entleman JayMan
7 weeks ago

Wakefield

No I don’t care what they’ve been up to in the past. I’ve met plenty of folk myself, so who am I to judge.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *olo180Man
7 weeks ago

West London


"I think the majority are smart enough not to burn their bridges by publicly stating in the place they're looking for casual sex with women that they look down on women who have casual sex.

There's plenty who do 💜

There definitely is. They'll have women they'll quite happily fuck but wouldn't have a relationship with. It's disgusting.

Why is it disgusting that a guy may want to fuck someone but not have a relationship with them?

This is a sex and swinging site not bumble!

There’s more facets to a choosing a relationship with someone than whether you want to fuck them or not!

It's not a statement about having fuck buddies. Sexual chemistry without romantic attachment is if course fine in itself.

It's the actively looking down on people for doing the thing you're doing that's the issue 💜"

Doesn’t mention anything about looking down…says that it’s disgusting that guys have women they will fuck and not have a relationship with….

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *reyToTheFairiesWoman
7 weeks ago

Carlisle usually


"I think the majority are smart enough not to burn their bridges by publicly stating in the place they're looking for casual sex with women that they look down on women who have casual sex.

There's plenty who do 💜

There definitely is. They'll have women they'll quite happily fuck but wouldn't have a relationship with. It's disgusting.

Why is it disgusting that a guy may want to fuck someone but not have a relationship with them?

This is a sex and swinging site not bumble!

There’s more facets to a choosing a relationship with someone than whether you want to fuck them or not!

It's not a statement about having fuck buddies. Sexual chemistry without romantic attachment is if course fine in itself.

It's the actively looking down on people for doing the thing you're doing that's the issue 💜

Doesn’t mention anything about looking down…says that it’s disgusting that guys have women they will fuck and not have a relationship with…."

Well I took it with the context of the post they were replying to.

It's open to interpretation I guess.

But those people who think that all the slags on here are fine for fucking but not worth their time otherwise, they can fuck off as far as I'm concerned 💜

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *cottish guy 555Man
7 weeks ago

London

It has no relevance to me.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *cottish guy 555Man
7 weeks ago

London


"If you push her away, you’ll spend every day from then chasing Amy, so to speak."

Nice to see a silent Bob quote.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *olo180Man
7 weeks ago

West London


"I think the majority are smart enough not to burn their bridges by publicly stating in the place they're looking for casual sex with women that they look down on women who have casual sex.

There's plenty who do 💜

There definitely is. They'll have women they'll quite happily fuck but wouldn't have a relationship with. It's disgusting.

Why is it disgusting that a guy may want to fuck someone but not have a relationship with them?

This is a sex and swinging site not bumble!

There’s more facets to a choosing a relationship with someone than whether you want to fuck them or not!

It's not a statement about having fuck buddies. Sexual chemistry without romantic attachment is if course fine in itself.

It's the actively looking down on people for doing the thing you're doing that's the issue 💜

Doesn’t mention anything about looking down…says that it’s disgusting that guys have women they will fuck and not have a relationship with….

Well I took it with the context of the post they were replying to.

It's open to interpretation I guess.

But those people who think that all the slags on here are fine for fucking but not worth their time otherwise, they can fuck off as far as I'm concerned 💜"

Guys that treat women on here like meat are low lives I agree with you

But also both men and women are on here for no strings sex and not looking for relationships and that’s fine. As long as people are treated with respect, that is the main thing

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *jh59Man
7 weeks ago

Stoke Golding

Her past is her pass, but she has told me all about it I don’t judge

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *reyToTheFairiesWoman
7 weeks ago

Carlisle usually


"Guys that treat women on here like meat are low lives I agree with you

But also both men and women are on here for no strings sex and not looking for relationships and that’s fine. As long as people are treated with respect, that is the main thing "

Like I said, absolutely nothing wrong with fuck buddies and casual hookups. There's no respect from the people who think the women on here are less than for having such.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ichaelsmyMan
7 weeks ago

Douglas

the past is the past, live for the present or the future.

although i have been with someone that i knew the previous partner as well.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *edSirenWoman
7 weeks ago

magic mountain

I’ve had comments made. It was usually dressed up in ‘you’d probably cheat… how could you be happy with just meeee’ 🙄 I refuse to be made to feel bad about my past, and present, because of someone else’s insecurities 🤷🏻‍♀️

The irony is that IF I choose to commit to someone, I actually give them 100%. I highly value trust, honesty, and loyalty. Regardless of my number or past.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *adagastMan
7 weeks ago

Rotherham


"I'm being serious for once and I really am interested.

Would you judge a woman on her sexual past if so why. I won't judge anyone for their reply but I'm genuinely interested"

Absolutely not! It's none of my business.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *iscoDougMan
7 weeks ago

London


"I'm being serious for once and I really am interested.

Would you judge a woman on her sexual past if so why. I won't judge anyone for their reply but I'm genuinely interested"

Absolutely not, no. The past is the past!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ora the explorerWoman
7 weeks ago

Paradise, Herts


"No, I wouldn't judge them whatsoever.

Their historical promiscuity would tell me that perhaps they are not compatible with me or we don't align."

I agree. If a man had 3 veris a week from different people there’s not a chance in hell I’d be interested. It’s not really judging. It’s more that’s great that you enjoy what you do but no ta not for me. If you all think that’s judging I’m good with that too 🤷‍♀️

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *egDaySkipperMan
7 weeks ago

Liverpool

If Lilly Phillips wants to fuck me, as long as she's showered and brushed her teeth and there isn't 150 dudes waiting outside, I'm down to fuck

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *effdelightMan
7 weeks ago

Grimsby


"I'm being serious for once and I really am interested.

Would you judge a woman on her sexual past if so why. I won't judge anyone for their reply but I'm genuinely interested"

I'd be aware of it but it depends what their intentions are now x

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *allipygousMan
7 weeks ago

Leicester

"What? You've had unvetted 20 man, no holes barred, bareback gangbangs every week for the past 10 years? No darling, it doesn't bother me in the slightest." Said no man ever. Well, unless he's from fabswingers, apparently.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ack1971Man
7 weeks ago

Cork


"I think the majority are smart enough not to burn their bridges by publicly stating in the place they're looking for casual sex with women that they look down on women who have casual sex.

There's plenty who do 💜"

Absolutely correct.

I've dated women that had 1 partner to others who had 300+ before I came on the scene. Never mattered to me, but I've known guy friends who all loved to fuck a woman with a high body count, but wouldn't date one.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *miler70Man
7 weeks ago

bn22

No I would never judge a woman on her past as we all have one

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *im le2Man
7 weeks ago

AYLESTONE

Do you judge a man on his sexual past And some still can't satisfy us.

It's only sex.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ora the explorerWoman
7 weeks ago

Paradise, Herts


""What? You've had unvetted 20 man, no holds barred, bareback gangbangs every week for the past 10 years? No darling, it doesn't bother me in the slightest." Said no man ever. Well, unless he's from fabswingers, apparently."

🤣 and no man is gonna comment on here that it would bother them. Funny though as that’s the man I’d prefer.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
7 weeks ago

To many people live in the past 🙄 fucking change the record.

We’ve all done shit, it’s all about the here and now that I care about.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ealitybitesMan
7 weeks ago

Belfast


""What? You've had unvetted 20 man, no holds barred, bareback gangbangs every week for the past 10 years? No darling, it doesn't bother me in the slightest." Said no man ever. Well, unless he's from fabswingers, apparently.

🤣 and no man is gonna comment on here that it would bother them. Funny though as that’s the man I’d prefer. "

It wouldn't bother me because I wouldn't be chatting to anyone who was into gangbangs in the first place so it would be irrelevant. That's not judgement as I said above. It's a preference.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ora the explorerWoman
7 weeks ago

Paradise, Herts


""What? You've had unvetted 20 man, no holds barred, bareback gangbangs every week for the past 10 years? No darling, it doesn't bother me in the slightest." Said no man ever. Well, unless he's from fabswingers, apparently.

🤣 and no man is gonna comment on here that it would bother them. Funny though as that’s the man I’d prefer.

It wouldn't bother me because I wouldn't be chatting to anyone who was into gangbangs in the first place so it would be irrelevant. That's not judgement as I said above. It's a preference. "

Yeah I don’t think most of the stuff people say is judging on here actually is.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *.hrisMan
7 weeks ago

Wilts

Yes, I have judged a women on her past before. It wasn't really the the amount of people that she slept with that was bothering me, it was the quality of the guys that she slept with. She would just get d*unk and let anybody sleep with her.

Not really for me 🤷🏽‍♂️

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *abtastic Mr FoxMan
7 weeks ago

A den in the Glen

No. I don't subscribe to the

Man - legend

Woman - slag

The most interesting women I speak to have more than one verification and I really don't give a flying fuck. People should just be themselves.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ora the explorerWoman
7 weeks ago

Paradise, Herts


"Yes, I have judged a women on her past before. It wasn't really the the amount of people that she slept with that was bothering me, it was the quality of the guys that she slept with. She would just get d*unk and let anybody sleep with her.

Not really for me 🤷🏽‍♂️"

But “no thanks your lifestyle isn’t for me” isn't judging. But people seem to think it is.

“Wow you fucking slag shagging all those people”. Yeah I’d accept that as judging.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *tephstockingsTV/TS
7 weeks ago

birmingham

The past is the past and it’s moulded said woman into the sexy person she is today helped her find out likes dislikes and for me that’s a turn on hope every one has a great day xxx

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ikemagic69Man
7 weeks ago

Bassingbourne

Personally no.. I really couldn’t care less. I would either find it a turn on or just not pay it much attention depending on what she would be up to. The present/future are more relevant x

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *eoBloomsMan
7 weeks ago

Springfield


""What? You've had unvetted 20 man, no holes barred, bareback gangbangs every week for the past 10 years? No darling, it doesn't bother me in the slightest." Said no man ever. Well, unless he's from fabswingers, apparently."

🤣🤣

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *upanovaMan
7 weeks ago

Sheffield

The past is the past. If you are meeting on here you kind of have to expect that many women will have had many partners. My ex didn't know many people she had slept with, but all I knew was she was with me now. As long as she wasn't playing the field her past did not bother me.

If you are FB or FWB then you most definitely cannot judge.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *a1970Man
7 weeks ago

East cork


"I'm being serious for once and I really am interested.

Would you judge a woman on her sexual past if so why. I won't judge anyone for their reply but I'm genuinely interested"

her past is none of my business....

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *usty kayWoman
7 weeks ago

Burnham on Sea

I seem to judge myself more than men on here do. Can't quite get the 'slag' image I was brought up with out of my head.

Also outside of here it's not something many people understand because my number was quite low before I got married.

If I were to have to start a new relationship I suspect I would start to feel judged for who I am. And meeting from here doesn't guarantee that wouldn't happen, I've met plenty of guys who are happy to swing while they are single but don't understand how couples can share.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *uiteman2020Man
7 weeks ago

Warsop

We all have a past

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *illy IdolMan
7 weeks ago

Midlands

It's a possibility. I'm always judging people. I'm even judging the one's above^ who say they don't judge.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *lanajMan
7 weeks ago

Yeovil

No judgement here ,does it matter it now that counts

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *hongmanMan
7 weeks ago

Nearby

I never judge about people's pasts. We all have pasts and if you meet someone you like it's all about the future

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *haos GremlinMan
7 weeks ago

Pontypridd

I only ever judge people on how they act with me. What they’ve done in the past is none of my concern

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *assageman300Man
7 weeks ago

Cambs

I never judge a book by its cover,I may have done worse.

In some ways a persons past may lead to something new, they may have tried something that I haven't and it could open a new sex habit lol

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *cottish guy 555Man
7 weeks ago

London


""What? You've had unvetted 20 man, no holes barred, bareback gangbangs every week for the past 10 years? No darling, it doesn't bother me in the slightest." Said no man ever. Well, unless he's from fabswingers, apparently."

Are we living in a black mirror episode where people come with a list of previous encounters?

Sure, if they tell you you could make a judgement based on that, but that's for you to decide.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *hismMan
7 weeks ago

Ballygonowhere

Simple answer,NO

I would be more concerned if she didn't have a sexual past

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *aron Van WinkleMan
7 weeks ago

A Dirty Hole

Maybe.

Serious answer. It’s not really about numbers, or who, but it also is.

The girl who’s slept with a dozen is just enjoying sex, but a 100 body count? Or more.

Remember the girl breaking world records… just why? Sex is now a sport or is it just an achievement for them?

Does it matter who? Maybe, I’m not bothered they were all cunts towards you, but after a dozen bad boys now you say yes to me?… hmm, did they get it out of there system before they wanted to settle down?

It’s complicated. But in Fab, or the swinging world it shouldn’t matter, but I bet it still does.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *aron Van WinkleMan
7 weeks ago

A Dirty Hole

Also, it’s the same for women. Not just guys, these questions that are directed to just one sex can obviously be asked to the opposite, we ae not different.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *heLeadbettersCouple
7 weeks ago

Reading


"I'm being serious for once and I really am interested.

Would you judge a woman on her sexual past if so why. I won't judge anyone for their reply but I'm genuinely interested"

We all have a past, so no judgement from me.

Not my monkey, not my circus.

J

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *eltCuteMightDeleteWoman
7 weeks ago

Reading

^^ This is an interesting comment though. Where does the number go from acceptable (in this example, 12) into unacceptable territory? Is it 100 for you? Less?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *pen to offers!Man
7 weeks ago

Carlisle

No I wouldn’t judge but I’d get turned on hearing about her sexual exploits if she wanted to discuss

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *atnip make me purrWoman
7 weeks ago

Reading

I've been told I have too many veris. Buller dodged,

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ackformore100Man
7 weeks ago

Tin town

Interesting to see the responses.Especially those who profess to not judge folks. Good thread op.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *vonne5exMan
7 weeks ago

Doncaster


"I'm being serious for once and I really am interested.

Would you judge a woman on her sexual past if so why. I won't judge anyone for their reply but I'm genuinely interested"

I've never judged or kissed and told personally I've been a rite un myself

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *HUSH-Man
7 weeks ago

London

Context matters.

If someone was in an open relationship or they explored their sexuality as a single person responsibly then a high body count or sexual history wouldn’t really bother me. Because it’s the nature of how they got there.

If they got there by cheating on their partner, having no regard for someone else then they wouldn’t have a moment more of my time.

Someone’s character above all else matters to me.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ommy2125Man
7 weeks ago

down

It would depend on the past and also the activity

Generally I wouldn't as long as they were honest about it.

E.g. wouldn't be happy if had a partner who said I've only slept with 10 people then find out the 10 people was last week and total is now 200.

Equally would have my views on someone who did say poop play (not saying it's wrong but would judge a future partner if they were into it).

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ansoffateMan
7 weeks ago

Sagittarius A

I am discerning, but that's not on the basis of judging someone as a good person. It's more about whether we are compatible.

For example, my sexual attraction tends toward intimate understanding of each other. If a woman isn't interested in getting to know each other, or simply doesn't have the time - then it's not going anywhere. In a sense that's a judgment based on my interaction with her.

If there was no judgment at all then what would it mean to like or love someone? Promiscuity past or present isn't a problem for me. However, deception is. I still wouldn't consider a deceptive person bad, just not a good match for me.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ose-tinted GlassesMan
7 weeks ago

Glasgow / London

I always said, when I was younger, that I didn’t want a virgin. I wanted a girl with plenty of experience. Someone who knew who she was, sexually. Who had tried everything and knew what she liked, didn’t like, etc.

I don’t think that preference has ever really changed. I still fall for self-assured women.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *abtastic Mr FoxMan
7 weeks ago

A den in the Glen

If I was fingering and my whole hand went in and I pulled out someone else's watch I would have a few questions and I don't know what order they would be in. It wouldn't include judgey body count questions but would include "could I keep the watch?"

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *hiversMan
7 weeks ago

Dinas Powys

Nope... none of my business. We all have a past.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *eoBloomsMan
7 weeks ago

Springfield


"I am discerning, but that's not on the basis of judging someone as a good person. It's more about whether we are compatible.

For example, my sexual attraction tends toward intimate understanding of each other. If a woman isn't interested in getting to know each other, or simply doesn't have the time - then it's not going anywhere. In a sense that's a judgment based on my interaction with her.

If there was no judgment at all then what would it mean to like or love someone? Promiscuity past or present isn't a problem for me. However, deception is. I still wouldn't consider a deceptive person bad, just not a good match for me."

Judgement just means taking a considered opinion, based on the evidence, and I think we all do that most of the time. It doesn't have to be a moral good/bad judgement at all.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ansoffateMan
7 weeks ago

Sagittarius A


"If I was fingering and my whole hand went in and I pulled out someone else's watch I would have a few questions and I don't know what order they would be in. It wouldn't include judgey body count questions but would include "could I keep the watch?""

If it was a Rolex I'd question her taste.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *eroLondonMan
7 weeks ago

Mayfair


"If I was fingering and my whole hand went in and I pulled out someone else's watch I would have a few questions and I don't know what order they would be in. It wouldn't include judgey body count questions but would include "could I keep the watch?""

If it was a Patek Philippe™ timepiece then at the very least you would know she's playing with a plethora of classy men.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *eroLondonMan
7 weeks ago

Mayfair


"If I was fingering and my whole hand went in and I pulled out someone else's watch I would have a few questions and I don't know what order they would be in. It wouldn't include judgey body count questions but would include "could I keep the watch?"

·

If it was a Rolex I'd question her taste."

I agree. I'm all for horological judgements.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *eoBloomsMan
7 weeks ago

Springfield


"If I was fingering and my whole hand went in and I pulled out someone else's watch I would have a few questions and I don't know what order they would be in. It wouldn't include judgey body count questions but would include "could I keep the watch?""

Could be the time of the month.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *alipartyhomeMan
7 weeks ago

rhyl

Seems to be ladies who judge on here sorry

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *antra MassageMan
7 weeks ago

Galway

I value sexual experience, so for me I'd be very interested. Curious also. I'm very sexualy experienced myself, so I think an inexperienced partner might not be a good match for me.

I'm very drawn to a woman who likes sex, and goes out and gets it. It's refreshingly countercultural in the society I live in, in Ireland.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ansoffateMan
7 weeks ago

Sagittarius A


"If I was fingering and my whole hand went in and I pulled out someone else's watch I would have a few questions and I don't know what order they would be in. It wouldn't include judgey body count questions but would include "could I keep the watch?"

If it was a Patek Philippe™ timepiece then at the very least you would know she's playing with a plethora of classy men."

😂 I do love your style Nero.

Time is money so I spent it on a watch.

Girls is players too!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *RcplSldnCouple
7 weeks ago

London

No judgement at all, totally sex positive here, obviously assuming it's nothing awful/illegal etc. I might not share the same kinks, but I totally support everyone being who they really are.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *erry bull1Man
7 weeks ago

doncaster

I’m more interested in a ladies personality than her past ,

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *he Silver FuxMan
7 weeks ago

Uttoxeter


"I'm being serious for once and I really am interested.

Would you judge a woman on her sexual past if so why. I won't judge anyone for their reply but I'm genuinely interested"

Yes, but not the numbers, I like experienced, I look at veris and see who she’s been fucking and what they say - quality not quantity.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *abtastic Mr FoxMan
7 weeks ago

A den in the Glen


"If I was fingering and my whole hand went in and I pulled out someone else's watch I would have a few questions and I don't know what order they would be in. It wouldn't include judgey body count questions but would include "could I keep the watch?"

If it was a Patek Philippe™ timepiece then at the very least you would know she's playing with a plethora of classy men.

😂 I do love your style Nero.

Time is money so I spent it on a watch.

Girls is players too!"

Yes, he certainly knows his timepieces. If I was a betting man I would suggest that I would fish out the Casio C-80 which again would raise a few more questions. Starting with "how fucking long has that thing been in there?" (Judgey I know) and ending with "does the calculator still work?"

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ansoffateMan
7 weeks ago

Sagittarius A


"If I was fingering and my whole hand went in and I pulled out someone else's watch I would have a few questions and I don't know what order they would be in. It wouldn't include judgey body count questions but would include "could I keep the watch?"

If it was a Patek Philippe™ timepiece then at the very least you would know she's playing with a plethora of classy men.

😂 I do love your style Nero.

Time is money so I spent it on a watch.

Girls is players too!

Yes, he certainly knows his timepieces. If I was a betting man I would suggest that I would fish out the Casio C-80 which again would raise a few more questions. Starting with "how fucking long has that thing been in there?" (Judgey I know) and ending with "does the calculator still work?""

I am not sure a Casio is waterproof to that depth. Splash proof maybe?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *lirty_fit2Couple
7 weeks ago

Northumberland

Absolutely not, it's not relevant to the here and now. We're in the "Lifestyle", it's about the pursuit of pleasure (safely) no one needs to keep count, male or female...

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oe moonMan
7 weeks ago

hull

Absolutely not ..

The Past has past !

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *litlicker77Man
7 weeks ago

dirty old town

Never

But I do like to hear about previous encounters

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *orksguy1965Man
7 weeks ago

Howden

No not at all, we all have a past

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ackson 501Man
7 weeks ago

Chesterfield

I must admit I am jealous I wasn't the first with my wife

But that's my fault 😞

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *abtastic Mr FoxMan
7 weeks ago

A den in the Glen


"If I was fingering and my whole hand went in and I pulled out someone else's watch I would have a few questions and I don't know what order they would be in. It wouldn't include judgey body count questions but would include "could I keep the watch?"

If it was a Patek Philippe™ timepiece then at the very least you would know she's playing with a plethora of classy men.

😂 I do love your style Nero.

Time is money so I spent it on a watch.

Girls is players too!

Yes, he certainly knows his timepieces. If I was a betting man I would suggest that I would fish out the Casio C-80 which again would raise a few more questions. Starting with "how fucking long has that thing been in there?" (Judgey I know) and ending with "does the calculator still work?"

I am not sure a Casio is waterproof to that depth. Splash proof maybe?"

I would argue it would need to be a G-Shock model too.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *abtastic Mr FoxMan
7 weeks ago

A den in the Glen


"I must admit I am jealous I wasn't the first with my wife

But that's my fault 😞 "

It was a long time ago and I've already apologised for being so fucking good too 😉

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ackformore100Man
7 weeks ago

Tin town


"If I was fingering and my whole hand went in and I pulled out someone else's watch I would have a few questions and I don't know what order they would be in. It wouldn't include judgey body count questions but would include "could I keep the watch?"

If it was a Patek Philippe™ timepiece then at the very least you would know she's playing with a plethora of classy men.

😂 I do love your style Nero.

Time is money so I spent it on a watch.

Girls is players too!

Yes, he certainly knows his timepieces. If I was a betting man I would suggest that I would fish out the Casio C-80 which again would raise a few more questions. Starting with "how fucking long has that thing been in there?" (Judgey I know) and ending with "does the calculator still work?"

I am not sure a Casio is waterproof to that depth. Splash proof maybe?

I would argue it would need to be a G-Shock model too."

G spot?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oc1998Man
7 weeks ago

Dundalk


"I'm being serious for once and I really am interested.

Would you judge a woman on her sexual past if so why. I won't judge anyone for their reply but I'm genuinely interested"

Nope, never ever will. Her past is none of my business

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *offeeLoverMan
7 weeks ago

Cheltenham

I wouldn’t be here if I did. As long as she doesn’t judge the lack of mine

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *iamondsmiles. OP   Woman
7 weeks ago

little house on the praire

Just found and read this thread, it was written while gin was consumed Some very interesting answers, lack of sexual compatability and preferences arnt judging.

I'm more than happy to be judged depending how they do it

Majority of people who judge you will ne wr know.

It's the guys that have come on the foru.s in the past gobbling off that all women on a swinging site are slags.

Noon of any significance in my life has judged me or tried to guilt trip me.

The reason I don't tell people stuff from the go is because I don't see it as their business and also because most of the time I can't be bothered to talk about sex. I don't hide it away like so e dirty little secret, the more someone gets to know me the more they find out.

When I do decide to mention something on the forums I use it as a safe space and accept some will judge but I also know some won't bat an eyelid.

Anyway guys thankyou and the ladies for your contributions it's been most interesting

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *abtastic Mr FoxMan
7 weeks ago

A den in the Glen


"

Anyway guys thankyou and the ladies for your contributions it's been most interesting

"

It wasn't even time consuming 😉

Leo, you'll like that one!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *iamondsmiles. OP   Woman
7 weeks ago

little house on the praire

gobbling off not gobbling off ha ha

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *cottish guy 555Man
7 weeks ago

London


"If I was fingering and my whole hand went in and I pulled out someone else's watch I would have a few questions and I don't know what order they would be in. It wouldn't include judgey body count questions but would include "could I keep the watch?""

This genuinely made me lol 😆.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *r SensualMan
7 weeks ago

London

Nope, why? Cos I love a woman who’s sexually liberated and who’s also sexually experienced too 😈

Am I naive enough to think 99.9% of women don’t have sexual pasts? No! Am I expecting most of, if not all women to be as pure as the Virgin Mary? Absolutely not 😅

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *iamondsmiles. OP   Woman
7 weeks ago

little house on the praire


"If I was fingering and my whole hand went in and I pulled out someone else's watch I would have a few questions and I don't know what order they would be in. It wouldn't include judgey body count questions but would include "could I keep the watch?"

This genuinely made me lol 😆.

"

I could tell a funny story about finding a guys watch in my knickers and having to give him it back the next day. But I won't as I will be so judged

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *abtastic Mr FoxMan
7 weeks ago

A den in the Glen


"If I was fingering and my whole hand went in and I pulled out someone else's watch I would have a few questions and I don't know what order they would be in. It wouldn't include judgey body count questions but would include "could I keep the watch?"

This genuinely made me lol 😆.

I could tell a funny story about finding a guys watch in my knickers and having to give him it back the next day. But I won't as I will be so judged "

Not by the ones that count you won't.

Did you have both hands in your knickers?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *inkyycurvyyWoman
7 weeks ago

Manchester


"I think the majority are smart enough not to burn their bridges by publicly stating in the place they're looking for casual sex with women that they look down on women who have casual sex.

There's plenty who do 💜"

👏👏👏

Anyone with any sense and hope of getting laid isn't openly going to admit that they do judge (but a lot will. Whether that means they will stop them fucking the women they judge is another question entirely though)

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *iamondsmiles. OP   Woman
7 weeks ago

little house on the praire


"If I was fingering and my whole hand went in and I pulled out someone else's watch I would have a few questions and I don't know what order they would be in. It wouldn't include judgey body count questions but would include "could I keep the watch?"

This genuinely made me lol 😆.

I could tell a funny story about finding a guys watch in my knickers and having to give him it back the next day. But I won't as I will be so judged

Not by the ones that count you won't.

Did you have both hands in your knickers?"

I used to be a barmaid and fancied this lad for ages, he offered me a lift and we went up a dark country lane.

We ended up having sex over the bonnet of the car with my knickers round my ankles. Finished off and took me home.

Went to go for a pee and his watch fell out my knickers god knows how it got there, must of fell of and landed in my knickers don't know how I didn't notice.

All very embarrassing handing it back to him over the bar the next night

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *olden PoleMan
7 weeks ago

Bromley

No…life’s for living and enjoying. If that means a healthy and promiscuous sex life then great. Also the experience gained can be shared which is a great turn on personally.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ooking for threesome funMan
7 weeks ago

Basildon

The past is the past and as long as you have been careful and are healthy what does it matter x

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *or7Man
7 weeks ago

Bath


"No, in fact would enjoy the stories "

This. I love a woman telling me about what she has got up to in the past.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *aughtywelsh89Man
7 weeks ago

Pontyclun

Won’t be bothered

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ll-Knight-longMan
7 weeks ago

Derby/Notts(Long Eaton)

All of our past experiences help to form the person we are & skills & experience promote confidence which helps when exploring new feelings & shared opportunities so I welcome a woman’s past with intriguing opportunities

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ackformore100Man
7 weeks ago

Tin town


"If I was fingering and my whole hand went in and I pulled out someone else's watch I would have a few questions and I don't know what order they would be in. It wouldn't include judgey body count questions but would include "could I keep the watch?"

This genuinely made me lol 😆.

I could tell a funny story about finding a guys watch in my knickers and having to give him it back the next day. But I won't as I will be so judged

Not by the ones that count you won't.

Did you have both hands in your knickers?"

The big hand is on the...

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *hesblokeMan
7 weeks ago

Derbyshire village

Nah, but in certain cases (not talking about body count) it'd be good to know so as not to make them uncomfortable with anything. A friend of mine once had severe issues with oral due to an ex, for example.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ysteryman6998Man
7 weeks ago

essex

Not really but if she’s been gangbanged by 500 black guys in one night it’s slightly different to 1 or 2 flings here and there

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *att71Man
7 weeks ago

The Shire of Wilt

Nope not at all if we are honest we all have a past , some more excitting than others

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *iamondsmiles. OP   Woman
7 weeks ago

little house on the praire


"Nah, but in certain cases (not talking about body count) it'd be good to know so as not to make them uncomfortable with anything. A friend of mine once had severe issues with oral due to an ex, for example."
That's just common sense and to discuss your likes, dislikes and expectations before a meet. I'm talking about disclosing your full sexual history

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *hesblokeMan
7 weeks ago

Derbyshire village


"Nah, but in certain cases (not talking about body count) it'd be good to know so as not to make them uncomfortable with anything. A friend of mine once had severe issues with oral due to an ex, for example.That's just common sense and to discuss your likes, dislikes and expectations before a meet. I'm talking about disclosing your full sexual history"

I wouldn't judge her on anything, no.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *illy IdolMan
7 weeks ago

Midlands


"Nah, but in certain cases (not talking about body count) it'd be good to know so as not to make them uncomfortable with anything. A friend of mine once had severe issues with oral due to an ex, for example.That's just common sense and to discuss your likes, dislikes and expectations before a meet. I'm talking about disclosing your full sexual history

I wouldn't judge her on anything, no."

What if she'd shagged her brother?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *aron Van WinkleMan
7 weeks ago

A Dirty Hole


"Absolutely not ..

The Past has past ! "

You’d be shocked how that past can pop back up in the future.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *hesblokeMan
7 weeks ago

Derbyshire village


"Nah, but in certain cases (not talking about body count) it'd be good to know so as not to make them uncomfortable with anything. A friend of mine once had severe issues with oral due to an ex, for example.That's just common sense and to discuss your likes, dislikes and expectations before a meet. I'm talking about disclosing your full sexual history

I wouldn't judge her on anything, no.

What if she'd shagged her brother?"

Then I probably wouldn't sleep with her. But I wouldn't think she was a bad person, necessarily. And before anyone mentions anything less legal, yeah I'd judge some things tbf.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *onyHoveMan
7 weeks ago

North East

No judging. No jealousy. We've all got a past...and a future, hopefully!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *obyorkMan
7 weeks ago

Keighley

I like sexually confident women and love hearing about their past adventures, preferably while they’ve got my cock in their hand

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
7 weeks ago

I think we all judge most of the time on most things, as much as we might like to say we don’t. We’re on a forum fgs, it’s the ultimate in opinion expression and judgement!

Maybe the key word in the OP it’s “past”. When we say past it could very well be something that has changed. If it’s not changed then I think we’re okay to judge because you can’t force anyone to like you or find your behaviour attractive, right?

Anyway, I think judgement is okay. If people don’t like to be judged then they can use their own judgement and use other people’s judgement of them as a filter and judgingly block the judges…

Happy Friday folks x

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *iFruityCoupleCouple
7 weeks ago

Watermouth

We never judge a lady on her past, but a few good verifications may persuade us to travel a bit further.

I think the point of this thread is would we think less of a woman with 200 plus partners, and can't remember their names, no, but we would like to know she has taken care of her health.

Let's be honest, that's natural, society programs us to think differently.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *iamondsmiles. OP   Woman
7 weeks ago

little house on the praire


"I think we all judge most of the time on most things, as much as we might like to say we don’t. We’re on a forum fgs, it’s the ultimate in opinion expression and judgement!

Maybe the key word in the OP it’s “past”. When we say past it could very well be something that has changed. If it’s not changed then I think we’re okay to judge because you can’t force anyone to like you or find your behaviour attractive, right?

Anyway, I think judgement is okay. If people don’t like to be judged then they can use their own judgement and use other people’s judgement of them as a filter and judgingly block the judges…

Happy Friday folks x"

It's not about being judged as much as the way people go about it. Judging people is part of life. I was just curious to see who judged based on past history.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
7 weeks ago


"I think we all judge most of the time on most things, as much as we might like to say we don’t. We’re on a forum fgs, it’s the ultimate in opinion expression and judgement!

Maybe the key word in the OP it’s “past”. When we say past it could very well be something that has changed. If it’s not changed then I think we’re okay to judge because you can’t force anyone to like you or find your behaviour attractive, right?

Anyway, I think judgement is okay. If people don’t like to be judged then they can use their own judgement and use other people’s judgement of them as a filter and judgingly block the judges…

Happy Friday folks xIt's not about being judged as much as the way people go about it. Judging people is part of life. I was just curious to see who judged based on past history.

"

I still reckon everyone does. But for some it won’t matter and for some it will. And I don’t reckon either are wrong x

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ire_thornMan
7 weeks ago

Sol The Narion system

No, I know I wouldn't want to be judged on my past.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ustamanMan
7 weeks ago

weymouth

No, we've all got history I'm more interested in the now

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *abtastic Mr FoxMan
7 weeks ago

A den in the Glen

Wow a thread filler.

To précis:

It is always customary as the thread closer to receive a DM off the hottest woman on here, congratulating them on wonderful timing.

No verification required.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 
 

By *hrills and adventureMan
7 weeks ago

Winchester

Whenever we meet someone, we form opinions on them. It's hard wired into us as part of our fight or flight reaction initially.

If we judge someone to be safe, we'll use these opinions to form an idea of who that person is and what their personality is like. That will determine whether we want to get to know them. We tend to form initial relationships based upon who that person is at the moment and who they are as a person in the present time. If we learn about a person's past, it's only natural that will have a bearing upon how we view someone. It may affect the way we see someone or we may chose to ignore it and say what happened in the past has no relevance to now. So yes, people will form an opinion upon your sexual past. Some will be affected by it, some won't and it will vary from person to person and upon what your past is.

Ultimately though, your past will help you form an opinion of them. If someone is judgemental or holds it against you, you are not going to want to be with them. It is tricky as I'm sure there are those who will say they are completely fine with it but then assume they have the green light to try anything you have done in the past with you, regardless of whether it's something you want to do now.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
back to top