FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Laurence Fox

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
17 weeks ago

So the actor Laurence Fox has been charged today under section 66A of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 of posting an upskirt image

The charge makes it an offence to to intentionally share a sexual image without consent, with the aim of causing alarm, distrsss, humiliation, or for sexual gratification

So my question is how do you protect yourself at meets to make sure no images are taken either overtly or covertly and does this act mean that sites such as these should decline photos of anyone with anyone else unless both are photo verified

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *wist my nipplesCouple
17 weeks ago

North East Scotland, mostly

Oh He always seemed like such a nice guy.

Mrs TMN x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *olly_chromaticTV/TS
17 weeks ago

ilkley and Stockport

He turned into an utter twat some years ago. With luck he'll go down for this

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *cLovin2Man
17 weeks ago

London

A total and Utter privileged nob. Good riddance.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
17 weeks ago

What a surprise. If only there had been some clue that he was a knob

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *estructionDollyWoman
17 weeks ago

The Deep Dark Woods

Hopefully they throw the book at him

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *edhotpocketrocketCouple
17 weeks ago

North West

A photo already in the public domain for almost 20 years. You make it sound like he took the photo and posted it. 2 tier justice system wil probably see him sent down for a photo you can find on Google. Country has gone to sh1t.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ristolman1234Man
17 weeks ago

Bristol


"A photo already in the public domain for almost 20 years. You make it sound like he took the photo and posted it. 2 tier justice system wil probably see him sent down for a photo you can find on Google. Country has gone to sh1t."

Upskirt photos were done by the paps till it was illegal and many celebs were photographed getting out of cars I’m sure some flashed on purpose to get their name out there.

Where LF went wrong is reposting it as that is illegal now even though as you say it is in the public domain.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *teinsGateDuoCouple
17 weeks ago

Newcastle under Lyme


"A photo already in the public domain for almost 20 years. You make it sound like he took the photo and posted it. 2 tier justice system wil probably see him sent down for a photo you can find on Google. Country has gone to sh1t."

And the sheeple gobble up the propaganda. Don't think, like what the state tells you to like and dislike what it tells you to dislike...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *cottish guy 555Man
17 weeks ago

London


"A photo already in the public domain for almost 20 years. You make it sound like he took the photo and posted it. 2 tier justice system wil probably see him sent down for a photo you can find on Google. Country has gone to sh1t.

And the sheeple gobble up the propaganda. Don't think, like what the state tells you to like and dislike what it tells you to dislike..."

I dislike him based on what he himself has said and done.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod
17 weeks ago

East Sussex


"A photo already in the public domain for almost 20 years. You make it sound like he took the photo and posted it. 2 tier justice system wil probably see him sent down for a photo you can find on Google. Country has gone to sh1t.

And the sheeple gobble up the propaganda. Don't think, like what the state tells you to like and dislike what it tells you to dislike..."

What propaganda is being put out about Laurence Fox?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
17 weeks ago

in Lancashire


"A photo already in the public domain for almost 20 years. You make it sound like he took the photo and posted it. 2 tier justice system wil probably see him sent down for a photo you can find on Google. Country has gone to sh1t.

And the sheeple gobble up the propaganda. Don't think, like what the state tells you to like and dislike what it tells you to dislike..."

Ooh conspiracy bingo..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
17 weeks ago

It's been quite a week for cockwombles getting their comeuppance

Middleton dodging tax

Fox being a knobhead

Joey Barton being a woman beating arsehole

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *allnHandsome12Man
17 weeks ago

Teesside


"A photo already in the public domain for almost 20 years. You make it sound like he took the photo and posted it. 2 tier justice system wil probably see him sent down for a photo you can find on Google. Country has gone to sh1t."

Let me get this right, he broke the law and you Don’t want him punished?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *RcplSldnCouple
17 weeks ago

London

Another thread proving very handy for new blocks.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *wist my nipplesCouple
17 weeks ago

North East Scotland, mostly


"Oh He always seemed like such a nice guy.

Mrs TMN x"

For the record - I was being sarcastic 😬

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *avinaTVTV/TS
17 weeks ago

Transsexual Transylvania


"Oh He always seemed like such a nice guy.

Mrs TMN x

For the record - I was being sarcastic 😬"

Yeah, yeah.. you're actually now going to have to take all the Lozza Fox posters in your private ladywank boudoir down now... 🤭

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
17 weeks ago

Manchester (she/her)


"Oh He always seemed like such a nice guy.

Mrs TMN x

For the record - I was being sarcastic 😬

Yeah, yeah.. you're actually now going to have to take all the Lozza Fox posters in your private ladywank boudoir down now... 🤭"

Jesus Christ 🤢

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inky_couple2020Couple
17 weeks ago

North West


"Oh He always seemed like such a nice guy.

Mrs TMN x

For the record - I was being sarcastic 😬

Yeah, yeah.. you're actually now going to have to take all the Lozza Fox posters in your private ladywank boudoir down now... 🤭

Jesus Christ 🤢"

Yes, Swing. You too

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *avinaTVTV/TS
17 weeks ago

Transsexual Transylvania


"Oh He always seemed like such a nice guy.

Mrs TMN x

For the record - I was being sarcastic 😬

Yeah, yeah.. you're actually now going to have to take all the Lozza Fox posters in your private ladywank boudoir down now... 🤭

Jesus Christ 🤢

Yes, Swing. You too "

Wow, done of the women in this forum certainly have odd tastes in men. 😬

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *avinaTVTV/TS
17 weeks ago

Transsexual Transylvania

*some of the women...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ongAndThick123Man
17 weeks ago

Shrewsbury


"So the actor Laurence Fox has been charged today under section 66A of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 of posting an upskirt image

The charge makes it an offence to to intentionally share a sexual image without consent, with the aim of causing alarm, distrsss, humiliation, or for sexual gratification

So my question is how do you protect yourself at meets to make sure no images are taken either overtly or covertly and does this act mean that sites such as these should decline photos of anyone with anyone else unless both are photo verified "

Protections: I tell people before meets that I don’t want a camera involved. (The one on my profile was a pre-planned one-off).

I don’t meet people if there’s photos or videos on their profile where it seems the camera is obscured. For example, the photo has been taken in a mirror during sex. Or looks like it’s behind a wash basket or on a desk or something similar.

Thirdly, I check the room before I begin. Make sure there are no open laptops, no devices around, etc.

Fourth - I make sure I remember who the person was and note the address, just in case.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
17 weeks ago

Manchester (she/her)


"Oh He always seemed like such a nice guy.

Mrs TMN x

For the record - I was being sarcastic 😬

Yeah, yeah.. you're actually now going to have to take all the Lozza Fox posters in your private ladywank boudoir down now... 🤭

Jesus Christ 🤢

Yes, Swing. You too "

Urgh. I've seen sexier cockroaches.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *urvyLady4BlackMenWoman
17 weeks ago

Norwich


"Another thread proving very handy for new blocks."

Agreed!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *cLovin2Man
17 weeks ago

London


"Oh He always seemed like such a nice guy.

Mrs TMN x

For the record - I was being sarcastic 😬

Yeah, yeah.. you're actually now going to have to take all the Lozza Fox posters in your private ladywank boudoir down now... 🤭

Jesus Christ 🤢

Yes, Swing. You too

Urgh. I've seen sexier cockroaches."

ROFL, never seen a sexy cockroach, I've seen a sexy gremlin.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inaTitzTV/TS
17 weeks ago

Titz Towers, North Notts

He deliberately did it and so should face punishment.

I wonder if Yaxley Lennon will condemn him, or is he only against sex offenders if they're not white?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
17 weeks ago

Yes I think fab should decline photos from single profiles that show someone else in regardless of their face is covered.

I have never needed to actively ‘protect’ myself as no one has gotten a camera out. If they did I’d leave. If they did it so I was unaware that’s not my failing it’s theirs

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *loria JamesTV/TS
17 weeks ago

Durham


"A photo already in the public domain for almost 20 years. You make it sound like he took the photo and posted it. 2 tier justice system wil probably see him sent down for a photo you can find on Google. Country has gone to sh1t.

And the sheeple gobble up the propaganda. Don't think, like what the state tells you to like and dislike what it tells you to dislike..."

By sheeple do you mean people who listen to Karen from Facebook and accept it as fact?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *loria JamesTV/TS
17 weeks ago

Durham


"So the actor Laurence Fox has been charged today under section 66A of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 of posting an upskirt image

The charge makes it an offence to to intentionally share a sexual image without consent, with the aim of causing alarm, distrsss, humiliation, or for sexual gratification

So my question is how do you protect yourself at meets to make sure no images are taken either overtly or covertly and does this act mean that sites such as these should decline photos of anyone with anyone else unless both are photo verified

Protections: I tell people before meets that I don’t want a camera involved. (The one on my profile was a pre-planned one-off).

I don’t meet people if there’s photos or videos on their profile where it seems the camera is obscured. For example, the photo has been taken in a mirror during sex. Or looks like it’s behind a wash basket or on a desk or something similar.

Thirdly, I check the room before I begin. Make sure there are no open laptops, no devices around, etc.

Fourth - I make sure I remember who the person was and note the address, just in case."

Did you take these precautions for both of your meets?

There was a time when Fab wouldn't allow pics showing a second person's face, if you had a single profile.

Has this changed?

It's pretty obvious if someone is taking pics and I wouldn't allow it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *issmorganWoman
17 weeks ago

Calderdale innit

I'm not a fan of single male, Profiles that show more of the women they've slept with than them. (I say male as I don't meet women). Especially when the woman can be identified, so yes I think there should be some changes to that.

I've reported profiles that show all of the lady and just the man's fingers or cock and was told as long as some part of him is in the pics, that's ok.

There's no deterrent at the min to stop anyone uploading their exes pics or sharing their unknowing partners pics on here with others.

That's something that's really wrong and I report those type of threads, but they can unfortunately upload their partners/exes pics and share them in messages etc.

So yes, restricting pic uploads unless they can be verified, would be a good start.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *alcolm XtraMan
17 weeks ago

Northfleet


"Karen from Facebook"

... but she's such a love!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rymedownunderMan
17 weeks ago

London/Australia


"It's been quite a week for cockwombles getting their comeuppance

Middleton dodging tax

Fox being a knobhead

Joey Barton being a woman beating arsehole "

It's always the one's you least expect isn't it?!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *eus n EuropaCouple
17 weeks ago

Dartford


"He turned into an utter twat some years ago. With luck he'll go down for this "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top