FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

What’s too rude!!

Jump to newest
 

By *ore_Please81 OP   Woman
24 weeks ago

Edinburgh

I have just had a picture removed as it’s too rude despite getting lots of Fabs and compliments.

To be fair it was niche and kinky but surely if it gained positive attention then one mediator should not remove just because it’s not to their tastes.

As far as I can see it didn’t break any rules.

What’s your thoughts and has anyone else had pictures removed 🙄

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *he turned me GreyCouple
24 weeks ago

Warwick and Coventry

I once had a picture removed, people took offence to a porcupine up my arse, go figure

Mr

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *enelope2UWoman
24 weeks ago

Doesn't matter cant block distances

Not had pictures removed but have had posts removed...I doubt it followed rules regardless of likes . That parts irrelevant.

I'm sure there's several guys in here who'd get off to the aroma of a sewage plant if it meant they'd get their dick wet.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *midnight-Woman
24 weeks ago

...

I had all of my dungeon pictures rejected, but my counterpart has been able to display them ....and several accounts loaded almost identical pictures with a 10 mins window 🙄🙄

But too rude for a female

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *midnight-Woman
24 weeks ago

...

Just to add, mine didn't break the rules, I checked

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atgirl and RobinCouple
24 weeks ago

Durham

We had a video removed cos it was apparently a screen recording from another site. It wasn't - it was one of our own Tiktoks

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *bi HaiveMan
24 weeks ago

Cheeseville, Somerset


"I have just had a picture removed as it’s too rude despite getting lots of Fabs and compliments.

To be fair it was niche and kinky but surely if it gained positive attention then one mediator should not remove just because it’s not to their tastes.

As far as I can see it didn’t break any rules.

What’s your thoughts and has anyone else had pictures removed 🙄"

Photos aren't removed due to personal tastes of photo mods. They're removed if they break site rules and the guidelines given to those approving image uploads.

Occasioanlly some slip through and may well be removed later if reported.

It's not personal. The photo rules are there whenever you upload a new image.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ildTimes.Man
24 weeks ago

Wherever I May Roam

I had several pics rejected after weeks of being on the site as apparently they "looked like they'd been uploaded from the internet" I then had to re photo verify to prove it was me, I think a jealous forum user that I mugged off took umbridge and reported me...I've no idea who it was ...🤷🏻‍♂️

🦆💦

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eoBloomsMan
24 weeks ago

Springfield

I once had a video of me breaking an egg with my penis judged to be too rude ! 🤣

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ildTimes.Man
24 weeks ago

Wherever I May Roam


"I once had a video of me breaking an egg with my penis judged to be too rude ! 🤣"

😂😂😂

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *empted23Couple
24 weeks ago

countryside

We have had lots of pictures of kink either taken down after days or just rejected

It's a bit sad that a sex positive site is that judgy but I guess they are allowed to set what ever rules they want

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eoBloomsMan
24 weeks ago

Springfield


"I once had a video of me breaking an egg with my penis judged to be too rude ! 🤣

😂😂😂 "

True story!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
24 weeks ago

Yeh, speculums are too hot for fabs. Lots of fun things are.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ildTimes.Man
24 weeks ago

Wherever I May Roam


"I once had a video of me breaking an egg with my penis judged to be too rude ! 🤣

😂😂😂

True story! "

I haven't seen it but I've been reliably informed there's a video on here of a guy inserting a Greggs sausage roll into himself and then eating it so...you must have upset someone 🤷🏻‍♂️

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eelaTV/TS
24 weeks ago

Waltham cross

Wowee

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *parkle1974Woman
24 weeks ago

Leeds


"I once had a video of me breaking an egg with my penis judged to be too rude ! 🤣

😂😂😂

True story!

I haven't seen it but I've been reliably informed there's a video on here of a guy inserting a Greggs sausage roll into himself and then eating it so...you must have upset someone 🤷🏻‍♂️"

TMI....TMI

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ore_Please81 OP   Woman
24 weeks ago

Edinburgh


"I once had a video of me breaking an egg with my penis judged to be too rude ! 🤣"

I skill I’d like to see x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *bi HaiveMan
24 weeks ago

Cheeseville, Somerset


"We have had lots of pictures of kink either taken down after days or just rejected

It's a bit sad that a sex positive site is that judgy but I guess they are allowed to set what ever rules they want

"

Here's the rules. Remember, Fab isn't a specialist kink site or a porn site - it's a swingers contact site. So what you may see elsewhere online won't always be acceptable on here. Hence more 'extreme' kink, BDSM, fisting, waterspouts and other subjects that some may enjoy arent allowed. Likewise tributes as they involve screenshots of other images or printed photos of other people. And if any image or video has watermarks or evidence of coming from another site, even if the image or video is your own, then it won't be allowed. Just upload the original and you shouldn't have any issue.

PHOTO RULES

Strictly adults 18+ only. You and anyone in the photos must be aged 18+ and MUST have been 18+ at the time the photos were taken.

The photos must be yours and you must be in the photos. You must be in any photo you upload. This means that photos of your bike/car/dildo collection for example, will be rejected unless you are in the photo too.

Nothing nasty. The photo can't show anyone who might be being hurt, or who has been hurt. It also can't show anything that is outside the norms. If it's too rude, taboo or unpleasant, or if it puts us off our dinner, it is not welcome here.

We're not Facebook. The site isn't for family shots, it's not facebook. That means ONLY pictures of adults aged 18+ at the time the photo was taken, no matter what the context.

No watermarks. Photo can't be watermarked. If your photo is watermarked either by this site or another site, it will be rejected. We can only accept original photos.

Others in your photo OK so long as faces are obscured and you have permission. You can have other people in your photos too (to clarify, you must also be in the photo) so long as you have their permission to upload to your account on here AND their faces are obscured (face pixellated or blacked out; just blacking out the eyes is NOT ok).

Legal. The photo can't show any illegal activity.

No pets / animals. Sorry, but you can't include your pets in the photos. Unfortunately, this turns some perverts on and we don't want their kind on Fab.

No public scenes with identifiable adults or under 18s. Photos taken in public places with other people in the background who can be identified OR under 18 will be rejected. If you have photos like this you want on the site, crop them in a graphics program or blank everyone in the background.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oobieTrapWoman
24 weeks ago

london


"I have just had a picture removed as it’s too rude despite getting lots of Fabs and compliments.

To be fair it was niche and kinky but surely if it gained positive attention then one mediator should not remove just because it’s not to their tastes.

As far as I can see it didn’t break any rules.

What’s your thoughts and has anyone else had pictures removed 🙄"

I had one removed for being too rude / I was being fisted and the bloke was wanking himself in the fist in me. I thought it was innovative

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ore_Please81 OP   Woman
24 weeks ago

Edinburgh


"I once had a video of me breaking an egg with my penis judged to be too rude ! 🤣

😂😂😂

True story!

I haven't seen it but I've been reliably informed there's a video on here of a guy inserting a Greggs sausage roll into himself and then eating it so...you must have upset someone 🤷🏻‍♂️"

Yup my photo was much more tasteful and tasty!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ore_Please81 OP   Woman
24 weeks ago

Edinburgh


"I have just had a picture removed as it’s too rude despite getting lots of Fabs and compliments.

To be fair it was niche and kinky but surely if it gained positive attention then one mediator should not remove just because it’s not to their tastes.

Yes the don’t like fisting or pussy stretching it seems x

As far as I can see it didn’t break any rules.

What’s your thoughts and has anyone else had pictures removed 🙄

I had one removed for being too rude / I was being fisted and the bloke was wanking himself in the fist in me. I thought it was innovative "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oobieTrapWoman
24 weeks ago

london


"We had a video removed cos it was apparently a screen recording from another site. It wasn't - it was one of our own Tiktoks "

I want to see your TikTok’s

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ore_Please81 OP   Woman
24 weeks ago

Edinburgh


"We have had lots of pictures of kink either taken down after days or just rejected

It's a bit sad that a sex positive site is that judgy but I guess they are allowed to set what ever rules they want

Here's the rules. Remember, Fab isn't a specialist kink site or a porn site - it's a swingers contact site. So what you may see elsewhere online won't always be acceptable on here. Hence more 'extreme' kink, BDSM, fisting, waterspouts and other subjects that some may enjoy arent allowed. Likewise tributes as they involve screenshots of other images or printed photos of other people. And if any image or video has watermarks or evidence of coming from another site, even if the image or video is your own, then it won't be allowed. Just upload the original and you shouldn't have any issue.

PHOTO RULES

Strictly adults 18+ only. You and anyone in the photos must be aged 18+ and MUST have been 18+ at the time the photos were taken.

The photos must be yours and you must be in the photos. You must be in any photo you upload. This means that photos of your bike/car/dildo collection for example, will be rejected unless you are in the photo too.

Nothing nasty. The photo can't show anyone who might be being hurt, or who has been hurt. It also can't show anything that is outside the norms. If it's too rude, taboo or unpleasant, or if it puts us off our dinner, it is not welcome here.

We're not Facebook. The site isn't for family shots, it's not facebook. That means ONLY pictures of adults aged 18+ at the time the photo was taken, no matter what the context.

No watermarks. Photo can't be watermarked. If your photo is watermarked either by this site or another site, it will be rejected. We can only accept original photos.

Others in your photo OK so long as faces are obscured and you have permission. You can have other people in your photos too (to clarify, you must also be in the photo) so long as you have their permission to upload to your account on here AND their faces are obscured (face pixellated or blacked out; just blacking out the eyes is NOT ok).

Legal. The photo can't show any illegal activity.

No pets / animals. Sorry, but you can't include your pets in the photos. Unfortunately, this turns some perverts on and we don't want their kind on Fab.

No public scenes with identifiable adults or under 18s. Photos taken in public places with other people in the background who can be identified OR under 18 will be rejected. If you have photos like this you want on the site, crop them in a graphics program or blank everyone in the background."

Not very sex positive then! I’ve seen things on here that isn’t to my taste and repulse me but I do not judge!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orny PTMan
24 weeks ago

Peterborough


"I once had a picture removed, people took offence to a porcupine up my arse, go figure

Mr "

Prick insertion limit: exceed?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ife NinjaMan
24 weeks ago

Dunfermline


"I have just had a picture removed as it’s too rude despite getting lots of Fabs and compliments.

To be fair it was niche and kinky but surely if it gained positive attention then one mediator should not remove just because it’s not to their tastes.

As far as I can see it didn’t break any rules.

What’s your thoughts and has anyone else had pictures removed 🙄

I had one removed for being too rude / I was being fisted and the bloke was wanking himself in the fist in me. I thought it was innovative "

Just.....how? The physics seem baffling 🤷‍♂️

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eoBloomsMan
24 weeks ago

Springfield


"I once had a video of me breaking an egg with my penis judged to be too rude ! 🤣

😂😂😂

True story!

I haven't seen it but I've been reliably informed there's a video on here of a guy inserting a Greggs sausage roll into himself and then eating it so...you must have upset someone 🤷🏻‍♂️"

Nothing new there 😭🤣

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ore_Please81 OP   Woman
24 weeks ago

Edinburgh

[Removed by poster at 20/02/25 18:58:09]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eoBloomsMan
24 weeks ago

Springfield


"I once had a video of me breaking an egg with my penis judged to be too rude ! 🤣

I skill I’d like to see x"

I lost the vid when I lost my last phone, maybe I will try and recreate it !

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *parkle1974Woman
24 weeks ago

Leeds


"Others in your photo OK so long as faces are obscured and you have permission. You can have other people in your photos too (to clarify, you must also be in the photo) so long as you have their permission to upload to your account on here AND their faces are obscured (face pixellated or blacked out; just blacking out the eyes is NOT ok).

"

But people don't need to prove they have "permission"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *luebell888Woman
24 weeks ago

Glasgowish

I have had a few removed. One for being too rude and the others for apparently not being me in them which was a joke and impossible to prove otherwise.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *bi HaiveMan
24 weeks ago

Cheeseville, Somerset


"

Not very sex positive then! I’ve seen things on here that isn’t to my taste and repulse me but I do not judge! "

You don't need graphic imagery to be sex positive.

And it's not judgement. There are reasons why certain things aren't allowed.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *bi HaiveMan
24 weeks ago

Cheeseville, Somerset


"Others in your photo OK so long as faces are obscured and you have permission. You can have other people in your photos too (to clarify, you must also be in the photo) so long as you have their permission to upload to your account on here AND their faces are obscured (face pixellated or blacked out; just blacking out the eyes is NOT ok).

But people don't need to prove they have "permission""

Read the site T's & C's.

Technically if you have anyone else in a photo on your profile you need to obtain photo ID of them, keep a copy and have written consent to use a photo containing them.......

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *parkle1974Woman
24 weeks ago

Leeds


"Others in your photo OK so long as faces are obscured and you have permission. You can have other people in your photos too (to clarify, you must also be in the photo) so long as you have their permission to upload to your account on here AND their faces are obscured (face pixellated or blacked out; just blacking out the eyes is NOT ok).

But people don't need to prove they have "permission"

Read the site T's & C's.

Technically if you have anyone else in a photo on your profile you need to obtain photo ID of them, keep a copy and have written consent to use a photo containing them......."

I see

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *bi HaiveMan
24 weeks ago

Cheeseville, Somerset


"Others in your photo OK so long as faces are obscured and you have permission. You can have other people in your photos too (to clarify, you must also be in the photo) so long as you have their permission to upload to your account on here AND their faces are obscured (face pixellated or blacked out; just blacking out the eyes is NOT ok).

But people don't need to prove they have "permission"

Read the site T's & C's.

Technically if you have anyone else in a photo on your profile you need to obtain photo ID of them, keep a copy and have written consent to use a photo containing them.......

I see "

Specifically.......

"10.12 You must not send or publish Content depicting anyone else unless you first:

a) ensure they are aware of your Fabswingers username and that they give you their specific written and signed consent to being included in the Content as well as to that Content being shown publicly on Fabswingers and potentially downloaded by other Users; and

b) verify that they are adults 18+ by getting and keeping a copy of their age ID.

You agree to carefully store their signed consent and age ID documents and that you will provide these immediately if we ask for them."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *parkle1974Woman
24 weeks ago

Leeds


"Others in your photo OK so long as faces are obscured and you have permission. You can have other people in your photos too (to clarify, you must also be in the photo) so long as you have their permission to upload to your account on here AND their faces are obscured (face pixellated or blacked out; just blacking out the eyes is NOT ok).

But people don't need to prove they have "permission"

Read the site T's & C's.

Technically if you have anyone else in a photo on your profile you need to obtain photo ID of them, keep a copy and have written consent to use a photo containing them.......

I see

Specifically.......

"10.12 You must not send or publish Content depicting anyone else unless you first:

a) ensure they are aware of your Fabswingers username and that they give you their specific written and signed consent to being included in the Content as well as to that Content being shown publicly on Fabswingers and potentially downloaded by other Users; and

b) verify that they are adults 18+ by getting and keeping a copy of their age ID.

You agree to carefully store their signed consent and age ID documents and that you will provide these immediately if we ask for them.""

A lot must get asked for that info then judging by the hundreds of images shown

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oeBeansMan
24 weeks ago

Derby


"Others in your photo OK so long as faces are obscured and you have permission. You can have other people in your photos too (to clarify, you must also be in the photo) so long as you have their permission to upload to your account on here AND their faces are obscured (face pixellated or blacked out; just blacking out the eyes is NOT ok).

But people don't need to prove they have "permission"

Read the site T's & C's.

Technically if you have anyone else in a photo on your profile you need to obtain photo ID of them, keep a copy and have written consent to use a photo containing them......."

I reckon around 3/4 of the site's non-couple photos and videos would need to be removed then and even a quarter is being generous

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ecky and justCouple
24 weeks ago

Godalming

There are some strange contradictions though…

We’ve had spanking photos removed in the past but there is a spanking classification available when you classify pics.

We’ve had warnings about digitally created images so we won’t ever load them again.

There does appear to be some subjectivity in the photo moderation.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
24 weeks ago

The photocopier at the gangbang is getting rather hot..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
24 weeks ago

Manchester (she/her)


"Others in your photo OK so long as faces are obscured and you have permission. You can have other people in your photos too (to clarify, you must also be in the photo) so long as you have their permission to upload to your account on here AND their faces are obscured (face pixellated or blacked out; just blacking out the eyes is NOT ok).

But people don't need to prove they have "permission"

Read the site T's & C's.

Technically if you have anyone else in a photo on your profile you need to obtain photo ID of them, keep a copy and have written consent to use a photo containing them......."

I think I could get it after the fact... (Actually I'm not sure anyone is in any of my pictures at the moment. Haha)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oeBeansMan
24 weeks ago

Derby


"There are some strange contradictions though…

We’ve had spanking photos removed in the past but there is a spanking classification available when you classify pics.

We’ve had warnings about digitally created images so we won’t ever load them again.

There does appear to be some subjectivity in the photo moderation. "

Are you saying we need a VAR on the photo mods?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *sleWightCoupleCouple
24 weeks ago

Ryde

OK, from personal experience, we've had stuff either rejected outright or retroactively rejected, including:

School uniforms.

Nun habits.

Fetish masks.

Anything other than the mildest of spanking photos.

Anything too "bondage-y".

When they can't distinguish between a slightly out-of-focus picture and a screenshot.

There was one instance where a photo of doggy-style action was rejected because it claimed that the guys' face wasn't obscured. This would be fine, but it was literally the top of his hair sticking out from just behind the wifes' head!

What gets retroactively rejected really is a moving target on here.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *parkle1974Woman
24 weeks ago

Leeds


"Others in your photo OK so long as faces are obscured and you have permission. You can have other people in your photos too (to clarify, you must also be in the photo) so long as you have their permission to upload to your account on here AND their faces are obscured (face pixellated or blacked out; just blacking out the eyes is NOT ok).

But people don't need to prove they have "permission"

Read the site T's & C's.

Technically if you have anyone else in a photo on your profile you need to obtain photo ID of them, keep a copy and have written consent to use a photo containing them.......

I reckon around 3/4 of the site's non-couple photos and videos would need to be removed then and even a quarter is being generous "

That was my thinking

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *he turned me GreyCouple
24 weeks ago

Warwick and Coventry


"I once had a picture removed, people took offence to a porcupine up my arse, go figure

Mr

Prick insertion limit: exceed?"

A Quilling time was had by all..

Mr

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ools and the brainCouple
24 weeks ago

couple, us we him her.


"I once had a video of me breaking an egg with my penis judged to be too rude ! 🤣

😂😂😂

True story! "

Was you in the middle of Tesco at the time

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *midnight-Woman
24 weeks ago

...


"I once had a video of me breaking an egg with my penis judged to be too rude ! 🤣

😂😂😂

True story!

Was you in the middle of Tesco at the time "

I once got thrown out of Tesco's at midnight for taking a photo of a clown 🤡🤡🤡🤡 doing their shopping... Full clown make up and outfit and everyfink

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orphia2003Woman
24 weeks ago

Tonypandy.

Always find it interesting how a single male profile showing multiple full body shot of clearly identifiable woman, with just few inches of his cock in the corner ever managed to get past the mods.

I've seen a number of images that push the boundaries of the rules get through and others get taken down for no apparent reason. Guess it doesn't always work.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ore_Please81 OP   Woman
24 weeks ago

Edinburgh


"

Not very sex positive then! I’ve seen things on here that isn’t to my taste and repulse me but I do not judge!

You don't need graphic imagery to be sex positive.

And it's not judgement. There are reasons why certain things aren't allowed. "

So you think vaginas are graphic? And every woman on her has experienced what my pic showed

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *riel13Woman
24 weeks ago

Northampton

I had the picture of my new Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles duvet cover on my bed taken down because I wasn't in the bloody picture (a rule I had forgotten) Gutted

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *reyToTheFairiesWoman
24 weeks ago

Carlisle usually

I mean. I was upset the time a small red scratch on my bum was defined as too rude for fab with that line about the breakfast in the rules, when there are plenty of pictures much more likely to make me lose my breakfast approved every day.

But. It is what it is. If you want kink pictures there's kink sites. This isn't the place. Even if some people do seem to just get away with it regardless 💜

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *bi HaiveMan
24 weeks ago

Cheeseville, Somerset


"

Not very sex positive then! I’ve seen things on here that isn’t to my taste and repulse me but I do not judge!

You don't need graphic imagery to be sex positive.

And it's not judgement. There are reasons why certain things aren't allowed.

So you think vaginas are graphic? And every woman on her has experienced what my pic showed "

Nope. Unless it's being fisted or having something excessive inserted.

And I have no idea what your photo contained, but 'every woman'? 🤔

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
24 weeks ago

If we let women learn how to use a speculum then who knows what they'll do next

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ore_Please81 OP   Woman
24 weeks ago

Edinburgh


"

Not very sex positive then! I’ve seen things on here that isn’t to my taste and repulse me but I do not judge!

You don't need graphic imagery to be sex positive.

And it's not judgement. There are reasons why certain things aren't allowed.

So you think vaginas are graphic? And every woman on her has experienced what my pic showed

Nope. Unless it's being fisted or having something excessive inserted.

And I have no idea what your photo contained, but 'every woman'? 🤔"

Well I enjoy both and there are a lot of women on here that do!

So the above is merely your personal preference and point of view.

Personally I don’t like aggressive cock pics and you have a few but I would want your self expression policed because it doesn’t suit everyone.

It was a speculum picture and was well like and compliment on. Any woman over 25 has experienced it and it’s not taboo

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eronikapaulCouple
24 weeks ago

Reading

We had a fully clothed holiday snap refused because there was a herd of wild Bolivian llama on the distant hillside.

"NO PETS ALLOWED " they said.

All you can do is laugh

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ore_Please81 OP   Woman
24 weeks ago

Edinburgh


"We had a fully clothed holiday snap refused because there was a herd of wild Bolivian llama on the distant hillside.

"NO PETS ALLOWED " they said.

All you can do is laugh "

That’s hilarious and who doesn’t love a Lama x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *cottish guy 555Man
24 weeks ago

London


"I have just had a picture removed as it’s too rude despite getting lots of Fabs and compliments.

To be fair it was niche and kinky but surely if it gained positive attention then one mediator should not remove just because it’s not to their tastes.

As far as I can see it didn’t break any rules.

What’s your thoughts and has anyone else had pictures removed 🙄

Photos aren't removed due to personal tastes of photo mods. They're removed if they break site rules and the guidelines given to those approving image uploads.

Occasioanlly some slip through and may well be removed later if reported.

It's not personal. The photo rules are there whenever you upload a new image. "

However, as has been previously mentioned, I had a photo removed from the couples profile we had while the other party displaying the same picture wasn't.

Consistency is not a forte.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
24 weeks ago


"That’s hilarious and who doesn’t love a Lama x "

I think we've established that the mods don't love a llama.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *bi HaiveMan
24 weeks ago

Cheeseville, Somerset


"

Not very sex positive then! I’ve seen things on here that isn’t to my taste and repulse me but I do not judge!

You don't need graphic imagery to be sex positive.

And it's not judgement. There are reasons why certain things aren't allowed.

So you think vaginas are graphic? And every woman on her has experienced what my pic showed

Nope. Unless it's being fisted or having something excessive inserted.

And I have no idea what your photo contained, but 'every woman'? 🤔

Well I enjoy both and there are a lot of women on here that do!

So the above is merely your personal preference and point of view.

Personally I don’t like aggressive cock pics and you have a few but I would want your self expression policed because it doesn’t suit everyone.

It was a speculum picture and was well like and compliment on. Any woman over 25 has experienced it and it’s not taboo "

As mentioned previously.....fisting photos/videos aren't allowed, nor speculum ones either.

And it's not my 'personal preference'. I'm a volunteer forum mod. I don't make the rules on permitted photo content.

I couldn't give a fig what two consenting adults get up to, indulge in many a thing that I wouldn't be able to upload photos of and should I want to see such images/videos, I know exactly where to go to find them.

I don't look for swinging contacts and meets on porn sites. Nor do I look for porn on Fab. 🤷‍♂️

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *midnight-Woman
24 weeks ago

...


"I have just had a picture removed as it’s too rude despite getting lots of Fabs and compliments.

To be fair it was niche and kinky but surely if it gained positive attention then one mediator should not remove just because it’s not to their tastes.

As far as I can see it didn’t break any rules.

What’s your thoughts and has anyone else had pictures removed 🙄

Photos aren't removed due to personal tastes of photo mods. They're removed if they break site rules and the guidelines given to those approving image uploads.

Occasioanlly some slip through and may well be removed later if reported.

It's not personal. The photo rules are there whenever you upload a new image.

However, as has been previously mentioned, I had a photo removed from the couples profile we had while the other party displaying the same picture wasn't.

Consistency is not a forte.

"

Same for me - my set of photos were all rejected, but the other person was able to load all of the pics and display them.

And two other male accounts had almost identical pictures that were all allowed.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *bi HaiveMan
24 weeks ago

Cheeseville, Somerset


"I have just had a picture removed as it’s too rude despite getting lots of Fabs and compliments.

To be fair it was niche and kinky but surely if it gained positive attention then one mediator should not remove just because it’s not to their tastes.

As far as I can see it didn’t break any rules.

What’s your thoughts and has anyone else had pictures removed 🙄

Photos aren't removed due to personal tastes of photo mods. They're removed if they break site rules and the guidelines given to those approving image uploads.

Occasioanlly some slip through and may well be removed later if reported.

It's not personal. The photo rules are there whenever you upload a new image.

However, as has been previously mentioned, I had a photo removed from the couples profile we had while the other party displaying the same picture wasn't.

Consistency is not a forte.

"

If you only had one photo mods for the site there'd be 100% consistency.

There wouldn't be enough hours in the day to approve the volume of photos added though and you'd likely be waiting weeks to get yours approved.

People are human. Mistakes are made. Some are corrected later and some slip through the net.

There are no paid staff on the site just volunteers. Always worth remembering. Sometimes I really wonder why people give their time freely for no reward. 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *elix SightedMan
24 weeks ago

Cloud 8


"I once had a video of me breaking an egg with my penis judged to be too rude ! 🤣"

Was it in an ovary?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orny PTMan
24 weeks ago

Peterborough


"I had several pics rejected after weeks of being on the site as apparently they "looked like they'd been uploaded from the internet" I then had to re photo verify to prove it was me, I think a jealous forum user that I mugged off took umbridge and reported me...I've no idea who it was ...🤷🏻‍♂️

🦆💦"

tineye

Google

Bing

all have rvsre image searches. Just drag and drop.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *BWPINKWoman
24 weeks ago

LEICESTER

I’ve had loads of pics removed even though the guys on here loved them.. pee #2 and period.. annoying!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *onnybluckyMan
24 weeks ago

Scunthorpe

Without seeing the pic

Can't really judge

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eoBloomsMan
24 weeks ago

Springfield


"I once had a video of me breaking an egg with my penis judged to be too rude ! 🤣

😂😂😂

True story!

Was you in the middle of Tesco at the time "

Please Jools, I'm strictly a Waitrose guy 🤣

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *glyBettyTV/TS
24 weeks ago

Not in your area

This has been happening a lot recently.

A funny screenshot I sometimes show people is a snap of my fab Photo Manager with 3 pics, the first & the 3rd, both removed for being "too rude" even though there's no genitalia on display & no sexual activity being depicted..

sandwiched in-between them is the approved picture #2 where I'm literally showing my full arse 🤷🏽

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eoBloomsMan
24 weeks ago

Springfield


"I once had a video of me breaking an egg with my penis judged to be too rude ! 🤣

Was it in an ovary?"

Only managed to breach one of those in my life and not planning on doing it again.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *elix SightedMan
24 weeks ago

Cloud 8


"I once had a video of me breaking an egg with my penis judged to be too rude ! 🤣

Was it in an ovary?

Only managed to breach one of those in my life and not planning on doing it again. "

Certainly not the same one

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ore_Please81 OP   Woman
24 weeks ago

Edinburgh


"I have just had a picture removed as it’s too rude despite getting lots of Fabs and compliments.

To be fair it was niche and kinky but surely if it gained positive attention then one mediator should not remove just because it’s not to their tastes.

As far as I can see it didn’t break any rules.

What’s your thoughts and has anyone else had pictures removed 🙄

Photos aren't removed due to personal tastes of photo mods. They're removed if they break site rules and the guidelines given to those approving image uploads.

Occasioanlly some slip through and may well be removed later if reported.

It's not personal. The photo rules are there whenever you upload a new image.

However, as has been previously mentioned, I had a photo removed from the couples profile we had while the other party displaying the same picture wasn't.

Consistency is not a forte.

If you only had one photo mods for the site there'd be 100% consistency.

There wouldn't be enough hours in the day to approve the volume of photos added though and you'd likely be waiting weeks to get yours approved.

People are human. Mistakes are made. Some are corrected later and some slip through the net.

There are no paid staff on the site just volunteers. Always worth remembering. Sometimes I really wonder why people give their time freely for no reward. 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️"

So I’ve just been contacting by a male profile who has multiple approved pictures of him with speculums in his ass and stretching.

Form this thread is seems that women get censored more on this site and men

So speculums in assholes are ok and not too graphic but not in vaginas? He has at least 8 approved pics so slipping through the net can’t be an excuse!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ore_Please81 OP   Woman
24 weeks ago

Edinburgh

So I’ve just been contacting by a male profile who has multiple approved pictures of him with speculums in his ass and stretching.

Form this thread is seems that women get censored more on this site and men

So speculums in assholes are but not in vaginas? He has at least 8 approved pics so slipping through the net can’t be an excuse!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lix CoxMan
24 weeks ago

CF39


"So I’ve just been contacting by a male profile who has multiple approved pictures of him with speculums in his ass and stretching.

Form this thread is seems that women get censored more on this site and men

So speculums in assholes are but not in vaginas? He has at least 8 approved pics so slipping through the net can’t be an excuse!

"

lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *andaloriansCouple
24 weeks ago

Malvern


"I once had a video of me breaking an egg with my penis judged to be too rude ! 🤣"

Theres so many questions! What kind of egg? Did it hurt? Did you eat it after? And most importantly, why!?

S

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top