Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
![]() | Back to forum list |
![]() | Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest | ![]() |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just because someone isn’t attracted to you and won’t reply to your messages or meet you doesn’t make them unreal or not genuine. " 100% this | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It does make you wonder, however, when the majority of polite messages receive no reply. I get the volume bit but a quick reply would be nice. It is also discourteous to suggest a day and time for a meet and then not respond to the asked for message to make final arrangements." It's mentioned in the FAQ why no reply should be taken as a no thank you. I'll also point out that although *you* may not abuse someone for saying no thank you, plenty of people do. And it's not worth the risk. (Also,if I closes my filters later, my "no thank you" means that the person I wasn't interested in can still message me. It's just not a good strategy) | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It does make you wonder, however, when the majority of polite messages receive no reply. I get the volume bit but a quick reply would be nice. It is also discourteous to suggest a day and time for a meet and then not respond to the asked for message to make final arrangements. It's mentioned in the FAQ why no reply should be taken as a no thank you. I'll also point out that although *you* may not abuse someone for saying no thank you, plenty of people do. And it's not worth the risk. (Also,if I closes my filters later, my "no thank you" means that the person I wasn't interested in can still message me. It's just not a good strategy)" This, not to mention the time it would take to reply to every single message with a polite no thanks. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It does make you wonder, however, when the majority of polite messages receive no reply. I get the volume bit but a quick reply would be nice. It is also discourteous to suggest a day and time for a meet and then not respond to the asked for message to make final arrangements. It's mentioned in the FAQ why no reply should be taken as a no thank you. I'll also point out that although *you* may not abuse someone for saying no thank you, plenty of people do. And it's not worth the risk. (Also,if I closes my filters later, my "no thank you" means that the person I wasn't interested in can still message me. It's just not a good strategy) This, not to mention the time it would take to reply to every single message with a polite no thanks. " I tried when I first joined. I couldn't keep up at all ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It does make you wonder, however, when the majority of polite messages receive no reply. I get the volume bit but a quick reply would be nice. It is also discourteous to suggest a day and time for a meet and then not respond to the asked for message to make final arrangements. It's mentioned in the FAQ why no reply should be taken as a no thank you. I'll also point out that although *you* may not abuse someone for saying no thank you, plenty of people do. And it's not worth the risk. (Also,if I closes my filters later, my "no thank you" means that the person I wasn't interested in can still message me. It's just not a good strategy) This, not to mention the time it would take to reply to every single message with a polite no thanks. I tried when I first joined. I couldn't keep up at all ![]() So did I. Then I tried with a copy paste no thanks… and got an automated message from fab telling me not to copy any paste (understandable). I quickly learned that for every 10 no thanks I sent, 3 would be abusive back, 4 would message more in the hopes they could change my mind, 1 would put up a status saying all the women here were time wasters and only 2 would take the rejection with good grace. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I tried when I first joined. I couldn't keep up at all ![]() I actually did a two week experiment (later on). One week, no thank you all around. Next week, delete without reply. I got *so much* more abuse that second week. People who'll abuse you for deleting without reply are much rarer. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I tried when I first joined. I couldn't keep up at all ![]() Exactly | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Of that 10% how many will want to meet us ‘nice’ guys ![]() Nice guys, or NiceGuysTM? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It does make you wonder, however, when the majority of polite messages receive no reply. I get the volume bit but a quick reply would be nice. It is also discourteous to suggest a day and time for a meet and then not respond to the asked for message to make final arrangements." What would be the point, if you had around 1000 unread messages would you go through them and send a reply? They go into auto delete and the stack stays the same size. Personally, I'd say mail boxes need a limit for non friends messages, say 100 unread messages, once the 100 number is reached that profile can not receive anymore messages until that profile has deleted or replied to some of the backlog. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It does make you wonder, however, when the majority of polite messages receive no reply. I get the volume bit but a quick reply would be nice. It is also discourteous to suggest a day and time for a meet and then not respond to the asked for message to make final arrangements. What would be the point, if you had around 1000 unread messages would you go through them and send a reply? They go into auto delete and the stack stays the same size. Personally, I'd say mail boxes need a limit for non friends messages, say 100 unread messages, once the 100 number is reached that profile can not receive anymore messages until that profile has deleted or replied to some of the backlog." Agree with this it would help ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It does make you wonder, however, when the majority of polite messages receive no reply. I get the volume bit but a quick reply would be nice. It is also discourteous to suggest a day and time for a meet and then not respond to the asked for message to make final arrangements. What would be the point, if you had around 1000 unread messages would you go through them and send a reply? They go into auto delete and the stack stays the same size. Personally, I'd say mail boxes need a limit for non friends messages, say 100 unread messages, once the 100 number is reached that profile can not receive anymore messages until that profile has deleted or replied to some of the backlog." For lots of profiles here that would take less than a day | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It does make you wonder, however, when the majority of polite messages receive no reply. I get the volume bit but a quick reply would be nice. It is also discourteous to suggest a day and time for a meet and then not respond to the asked for message to make final arrangements. It's mentioned in the FAQ why no reply should be taken as a no thank you. I'll also point out that although *you* may not abuse someone for saying no thank you, plenty of people do. And it's not worth the risk. (Also,if I closes my filters later, my "no thank you" means that the person I wasn't interested in can still message me. It's just not a good strategy)" I think that if you close your filters _and_ individually block the person, it removes the allowance for them to message you again. But then they'll moan about how "rude" you were to block them. It might be possible to block them to cancel their message privilege then unblock them, putting them back to the status quo of "you can look but not message me", but it's a load of faff doing that. And let's face it, they'll still be unhappy. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It does make you wonder, however, when the majority of polite messages receive no reply. I get the volume bit but a quick reply would be nice. It is also discourteous to suggest a day and time for a meet and then not respond to the asked for message to make final arrangements. It's mentioned in the FAQ why no reply should be taken as a no thank you. I'll also point out that although *you* may not abuse someone for saying no thank you, plenty of people do. And it's not worth the risk. (Also,if I closes my filters later, my "no thank you" means that the person I wasn't interested in can still message me. It's just not a good strategy) I think that if you close your filters _and_ individually block the person, it removes the allowance for them to message you again. But then they'll moan about how "rude" you were to block them. It might be possible to block them to cancel their message privilege then unblock them, putting them back to the status quo of "you can look but not message me", but it's a load of faff doing that. And let's face it, they'll still be unhappy." If I lived in a way to make random people here think I'm something other than rude, I'd have found myself in some pretty bad situations ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I mostly meet men on fab and the only lack of truth has been regarding age. But I do only meet after I have been chatting for a while and have spoken on the phone. This is when i catch the fake couples and the married. Otherwise everyone has been who they portrayed. Just slow your roll and ask the questions then you can get that number down. " we've had a fair bit of interest from couples lately who we've managed to sniff out as a waste of time or a single man. Either only the man is available or the woman only watches or isn't playing at the moment. So frustrating | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Of that 10% how many will want to meet us ‘nice’ guys ![]() Oh I think you know ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Of that 10% how many will want to meet us ‘nice’ guys ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top | ![]() |