Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
![]() | Back to forum list |
![]() | Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest | ![]() |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I can’t really answer your question other than it depends on what’s being said at the time. If it’s getting particularly savoury, it should be more frequent than discussing what you’re watching on television. It should be a good match for your own messages, in frequency and what’s said though. Some are like pulling teeth, that’s usually not a good sign." Yeah, when it feels quite... f*rced it's not particularly enjoyable is it? There's a difference between someone not really being in to talking via messaging/a bit crap at it vs someone who isn't really in to talking to you. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I can’t really answer your question other than it depends on what’s being said at the time. If it’s getting particularly savoury, it should be more frequent than discussing what you’re watching on television. It should be a good match for your own messages, in frequency and what’s said though. Some are like pulling teeth, that’s usually not a good sign. Yeah, when it feels quite... f*rced it's not particularly enjoyable is it? There's a difference between someone not really being in to talking via messaging/a bit crap at it vs someone who isn't really in to talking to you. " Exactly right. However it’s also possible that they want to but aren’t very good at it, as Luna mentioned in another thread. Communication via messages can be a guideline to how someone is, but it’s not always accurate. I’ve experienced both - brilliant messages that were a dream to read but in person it was just a bit flat, and also all getting a bit tongue tied and staccato in messages but really good to meet. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If the relationship is casual (rather than romantic) then I’d prefer the contact to be sporadic. Check in, make arrangements etc, but don’t bombard with messages." What are you like when it comes to romantic? I imagine quite the opposite but that might be an unfair assumption based on very little! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You're talking to someone. Thinking about possibly meeting them/just enjoying the chat. Or you've met them - are seeing/dating/fwbs. What, for you, is the sweet spot when it comes to frequency of messaging? Are you a daily talker? A sporadic but with intent messager? Would you lose interest if there was a particular gap/intensity to message frequency? " I definitely like to chat a few times during the day especially when you have lots in common and have a laugh. It's lovely when a message can just make the crappiest day better. And when they get a little bit 😈 leading up to a meet then that's all the better 😋. It builds the relationship for me with a Fwb ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If the relationship is casual (rather than romantic) then I’d prefer the contact to be sporadic. Check in, make arrangements etc, but don’t bombard with messages. What are you like when it comes to romantic? I imagine quite the opposite but that might be an unfair assumption based on very little!" Then I like to know that they’re thinking of me. Silly small things like messages because they’ve seen something and thought of me or just had the urge to tell me something, no matter how trivial. I like knowing I’m on their mind and don’t like having to chase for their attention. I prefer to keep the distance in messaging in non romantic relationships because then I can’t get mixed signals. I do have a habit of reading too much into things otherwise. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() "I like to chat. Can’t stand it when guys show an interest but only message when they’re free. When you say you’re busy then they don’t message again for a week or two til they’re free again and wanna meet. A little chit chat is good " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If I’m definitely interested/attracted then I like at least a daily check in, but not as any sort of duty, just because they’re someone I really enjoy chatting to " Yeah when it feels duty bound it loses some of its sparkle. I like when people talk to me because they want to. Because they enjoy it. I'd rather be skipped if it was a need rather than a want. If that makes sense. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Knowing men like I know them I don't often message first. I gauge how much someone wants me by how often they message. Once we've had sex the messages tail off, until I they only message when they need sex, and no one else is available. I don't like to bother people, so I leave the ball in their court. If I feel like having sex with someone I'll agree, if I'm not busy. " Oh this is kind of sad Nanna. Are you happy with that? I dated a man once who was always very eager to message in the run up, you know love declarations, all of that. Once the date was over, we'd had sex, he'd disappear for a few days. Come back when he was horny. It didn't really last very long. ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It totally depends on the person. But I like consistency (though obviously accept that real life can get in the way). I also like effort and that sweet spot of feeling a real desire to meet me without feeling hounded. " Consistency is important. It's different from frequency isn't it? If you feel hounded, are you direct about that? In a polite way of course. It's rare I do but I would say something. I suppose it's about how someone engages as well. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I find it hard to leave a message unreplied to, so as soon as I read one I'm compelled to respond and sometimes feel that comes across as needy/attention seeking, so try to calm it down a bit! As has been said already, it's always better when energy is reciprocated." This is me too. I have a busy life…work/kids/friends but if I want to reply to someone then i will find the time. Even if it’s just to say I’m busy right now but will chat properly later. I know I don’t owe people that but I just find that’s nice to do so I do like it when that’s reciprocated. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Knowing men like I know them I don't often message first. I gauge how much someone wants me by how often they message. Once we've had sex the messages tail off, until I they only message when they need sex, and no one else is available. I don't like to bother people, so I leave the ball in their court. If I feel like having sex with someone I'll agree, if I'm not busy. Oh this is kind of sad Nanna. Are you happy with that? I dated a man once who was always very eager to message in the run up, you know love declarations, all of that. Once the date was over, we'd had sex, he'd disappear for a few days. Come back when he was horny. It didn't really last very long. ![]() I think we have all had one of those who only message when they are horny. Kick them to the kerb as there will always be someone else who likes you genuinely. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top | ![]() |