Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't really see that many benefits to a relationship, short of someone to do stuff with that I can't do with regular friends. Physical contact is nice, but I have no desire to have someone in my life to the level of previous relationships and it doesn't bother me if someone understands me or not (most don't). Like, I don't want to deal with jealousy, being told off for farting or leaving cups on the floor, being expected to meet their family or friends, critisised for how I spend my money, plan holidays to places I have no interest in, or work my weekends around their kids/pets/other commitments. If it flows naturally, well that's great - but I certainly don't go searching for that. I also have this pattern of attracting insecure women who want to 'merge' with me - I think it's their response to my avoidant tendencies, and it's very difficult to break away from someone like that. " Totally get that most of my attached friends do nothing but moan about other half | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s that smidgen of hope that one day you’ll find your ride or die. And really, if that happens then the rest of it (the reasons for not wanting a relationship) become inconsequential. " But what evidence is there that that "one ride" exists? Plenty of people (particularly generations of such an age there aren't many of them left) believed it, coupled up for 60 years etc. But brutally interrogate them - you'll find deceit, lies, infidelities, physical and emotional abuse, sexual abuse, resentment - and staying with each other because the social and/or economic costs were too high to leave. And "hope"? Why "hope" for something that has no evidence to back it up as a reality, rather than a dream absorbed into your mind and our general culture through fairytales, pretty dresses, strong men, compliant women...everything that can be thrown at the myth-making from any gendered angle. Given the chance to have people in our lives who "lift us", and our social and economic wellbeing not suffering, is it not more realistic to have, for example, some people you may only have loved intensely for a few hours, a few days - some a few years. The social and economic wellbeing comment is key to that statement. The concept of "the one true love" - doesn't stand up to much scrutiny. I loved someone for 3 months once nearly as much as I loved someone in the entire 19 years we were together - and I really loved them both, but the 3 months was an exceptionally deep and intense love, and once it wasn't any more, I moved on. But in 3 months it gave me almost as much as the 19 year relationship (which was good, spectacularly good at times). Why expect "one"? Why expect it to last? It's rarely real, but we love to think it is. Love's real - it can last 20 seconds or 90 years. It doesn't have to last either - it lasts as long as it lasts, assuming we are economically and socially secure enough to make our own decisions. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s that smidgen of hope that one day you’ll find your ride or die. And really, if that happens then the rest of it (the reasons for not wanting a relationship) become inconsequential. But what evidence is there that that "one ride" exists? Plenty of people (particularly generations of such an age there aren't many of them left) believed it, coupled up for 60 years etc. But brutally interrogate them - you'll find deceit, lies, infidelities, physical and emotional abuse, sexual abuse, resentment - and staying with each other because the social and/or economic costs were too high to leave. And "hope"? Why "hope" for something that has no evidence to back it up as a reality, rather than a dream absorbed into your mind and our general culture through fairytales, pretty dresses, strong men, compliant women...everything that can be thrown at the myth-making from any gendered angle. Given the chance to have people in our lives who "lift us", and our social and economic wellbeing not suffering, is it not more realistic to have, for example, some people you may only have loved intensely for a few hours, a few days - some a few years. The social and economic wellbeing comment is key to that statement. The concept of "the one true love" - doesn't stand up to much scrutiny. I loved someone for 3 months once nearly as much as I loved someone in the entire 19 years we were together - and I really loved them both, but the 3 months was an exceptionally deep and intense love, and once it wasn't any more, I moved on. But in 3 months it gave me almost as much as the 19 year relationship (which was good, spectacularly good at times). Why expect "one"? Why expect it to last? It's rarely real, but we love to think it is. Love's real - it can last 20 seconds or 90 years. It doesn't have to last either - it lasts as long as it lasts, assuming we are economically and socially secure enough to make our own decisions." Because plenty of people have found that one. Plenty of people, if you brutally interrogate them, would admit that yes their relationship has had it’s flaws (cheating maybe) but their love for each other ultimately won out on them staying together rather than splitting up. And why hope? Because hope is a positive. Hoping for love keeps us open to possibilities, encourages optimism and vulnerability. It pushes us to seek deeper relationships and to maybe, just maybe, be open to invest in meaningful connections. I don’t think there is anything wrong in being hopeful that you may find your special person. I didn’t mention long floaty dresses and overtly romanticised versions of love. Love is different for everyone. But your ride or die is someone who you find that matches that energy. Be it for a short time or a long time. We are all different, we all look for different things from a relationship and in a relationship. Nothing wrong with that. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Plenty? Can you quantify that outside of anecdotal evidence, and how people need to construct a myth about their world in order to make sense of it. What people say is real and what is real aren't natural allies. Was it love that kept them together? Or social and economic circumstances? Saving face? Or a belief system around "one love"? No matter how common that belief system is, it's still a belief system. Reality can be capable of far more optimism than hope, and it's easier to bring into practice. I get the feels - I really do. We're a feeling species. But we're also a critical species, and we can interrogate our assumptions. Romantic love isn't any less romantic love whether it's one person, for a long time, or many people for tiny amounts of time or much longer. Why does anyone NEED others more than the natural life of that love? To be happy with it lasting 2 days or 20 years is enough, if we are secure enough ourselves - socially, economically, emotionally. " You’re right that what we call “love” is often shaped by our need to make sense of the world, and it doesn’t exist in a vacuum. Social, economic, and psychological factors etc all play a part as do our upbringings and all that jazz. But love, whether fleeting or enduring, is a reflection of our capacity to connect and create meaning in ways that transcend pure practicality. It might be a “belief system,” but that doesn’t make it any less real to those who experience it, does it? I do agree that romantic love isn’t diminished by its duration or form. Two days of genuine connection can be just as profound and “real” as 20 years. Surely what matters is our openness to experience it fully and authentically, without clinging to expectations. Which is where hope comes in (to my mind). I don’t think there’s anything wrong with being a hopeful romantic. Hope, for me, isn’t about ignoring reality or clinging to illusions—it’s about being open to connection and the possibility of something meaningful, whether it lasts a moment or a lifetime. Being a (hopeful!) romantic, in its own way, is a celebration of the human experience. It’s not necessarily about denying critical thought but about embracing the beauty and depth of feeling that make life richer. I think there’s space for both critical reflection and hopeful longing—they don’t have to cancel each other out do they Nicky? To me, being hopeful doesn’t mean being naive. It’s about choosing to see love and connection as valuable, even if they’re fleeting or shaped by external factors. And I feel that is worth holding onto. As to your point about optimism and reality. Maybe love and hope are less about needing something to last forever and more about finding value and joy in what is, however long it lasts. Whether we label it “love” or something else, it’s about what it means to us in that moment. It’s also true that when we’re secure (and happy) in ourselves, we can appreciate love for what it is—temporary, evolving, or enduring—without needing it to fill a void. Isn’t that the beauty of being human? Balancing our feels with critical self reflection, and finding our own way of embracing both. It’s a very fluid thing. We obviously have different views, and that’s ok. I don’t want to detract from the OP’s post. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The only thing would be finances... splitting bills would be nice. " My views exactly plus a man about the house for all those DIY jobs too would be good. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Um, er, um.... Nope. I can think of absolutely no benefits at all" Absolutely agree...live your best life and don't let others stop you | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Cuddles is good, connection is good and also knowing that somebody sees you for you, like really sees you. " Pretty much exactly this too. I miss intimacy and feeling like someone genuinely cares about me as more than a shag/option | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Cuddles is good, connection is good and also knowing that somebody sees you for you, like really sees you. " Couldn't have put it better if I tried. This is exactly what I'd love a relationship to be like. Whether that happens who knows | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"PS. A relationship by day and swinging partner by night would be awesome Wouldn't it just?😁" I've met with many couple who've formed long term relationships via Fab. It does happen 🤞🏻 | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't really see that many benefits to a relationship, short of someone to do stuff with that I can't do with regular friends. Physical contact is nice, but I have no desire to have someone in my life to the level of previous relationships and it doesn't bother me if someone understands me or not (most don't). Like, I don't want to deal with jealousy, being told off for farting or leaving cups on the floor, being expected to meet their family or friends, critisised for how I spend my money, plan holidays to places I have no interest in, or work my weekends around their kids/pets/other commitments. If it flows naturally, well that's great - but I certainly don't go searching for that. I also have this pattern of attracting insecure women who want to 'merge' with me - I think it's their response to my avoidant tendencies, and it's very difficult to break away from someone like that. " That's still not a relationship..all that can be had with a friend with benefits and ZERO monogamous relationship involvement | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The only thing I'm missing by being single is having a intimate mate to do "stuff" together. Pop out for Sunday lunch Weekend drinks Cinema Cosy cuddles on the sofa Country walks holding hands Stuff is often better enjoyed together with "your person"." I guess it's just a UK thing because ALL OF THAT can and should and dies happen with a friend and benefits.. zero relationship..only thing I see here is a relationship title means entrapment for one while they are getting lied on and cheated on | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Each passing month I become less convinced a relationship is what I want. I certainly don’t need one, I’m comfortable and content in my own quiet company and I have modest expectations from life. However, what I would like is someone with whom I can: Go on days/evenings out Go away for spontaneous weekend breaks Go away on foreign holidays Hibernate in the winter Make and share memories Attend events without feeling like a spare one Share a joke when either of us is down Share a problem when either of us has one Share their joy when it comes Learn and grow Provide support in all aspects of her life Enjoy the feeling of giving love, presents and gestures Buy nice clothes and get dressed up Be intimate together And so much more. The desire for all the above is currently winning over being alone and lonely." 100% this | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Morning sex" Overated | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"PS. A relationship by day and swinging partner by night would be awesome Wouldn't it just?😁 I've met with many couple who've formed long term relationships via Fab. It does happen 🤞🏻" Meeting anyone at all on here is seemingly impossible but I live in hope. I'd certainly love to meet you looking at your photos!😁 | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is it cuddles on tap (or at least regularly)? Is it that feeling of intimacy and that someone understands you and is there for you? Is it someone to share things with and be a witness to your life? Or something else?" My love language is touch Sometimes I wanna cuddle someone at night Doesn’t always mean sex If it was a case of sex with any woman I wanted on earth and sleep alone Or no sex and cuddle up to someone at night I’d choose the cuddle up at night | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |