FabSwingers.com forum: (Not so) Wicked...?

By *uri00620 OP Woman
14 weeks ago

Croydon

Having never seen the show or even The Wizard of Oz for that matter I thought I'd give the new Wicked a crack after rave reviews.

I mean it's good, bright, well acted (feel like the score is pretty mediocre however). Just the 2 part aspect feels like an unnecessary Hollywood money grab. In 2hrs 40 mins surely the stage show could have been condensed into 1 film. Or maybe I'm missing the point entirely?

By *emonochromeMan
14 weeks ago

Peterborough

I assume they’re more following the books but of course also money

By *he AmbassadorMan
14 weeks ago

IRLANDA. / Prague. / Cil Dara

"Having never seen the show or even The Wizard of Oz for that matter I thought I'd give the new Wicked a crack after rave reviews.

"
how in the name of jesus did you get so lucky not to have seen it

By *uri00620 OP Woman
14 weeks ago

Croydon

"Having never seen the show or even The Wizard of Oz for that matter I thought I'd give the new Wicked a crack after rave reviews.

how in the name of jesus did you get so lucky not to have seen it"

Ha, the original film and book has just passed me by. Haven't ever given the stage show a second thought. With all the positivity around this film I wagered it'd be worth a watch. It is probably, just not sure I'd wait in antipation for part 2.