Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
![]() | Back to forum list |
![]() | Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest | ![]() |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Most certainly Then I don’t have to pretend I know what I’m doing" My favourite thing ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Or intimidate you? As in, they’re probably most definitely smarter than you? " Do they intimidate me? No Are they most definitely smarterer than me. Yes. Do they turn me on? Fuck yes! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd say I'm definitely attracted to smarter women over the opposite. A few have intimated me I in that way I guess, but as long as they aren't dicks about it it doesn't really matter." I think I’ve been intimidated before in a sense of - I’m scared to get things wrong because they definitely correct me in a certain way. Mostly I think people aren’t dicks which helps. And it is just me being super attracted to them. Like yes- teach me things. Tell me about your PHD. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I know my 12 times tables, just saying 😁" Aaaaaaaaaaaand I’m turned on. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I know my 12 times tables, just saying 😁 Aaaaaaaaaaaand I’m turned on. " Might even learn it in Spanish 😘 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Most certainly Then I don’t have to pretend I know what I’m doing" Great point | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I know my 12 times tables, just saying 😁" I can count up to 144 on the fingers of two hands, but I was taught how to do that by a woman! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Ooh yes! We love intelligent ladies, especially if they're a bit posh too." I rely on this far more to bring me joy than being reasonably clever. Amazing how reverting to the RP of my boarding school days seems to work. “Posh totty” is definitely a thing…. ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Or intimidate you? As in, they’re probably most definitely smarter than you? " Well, it is different for dating and sex. In dating, people usually interact with other who are like them, socioeconmically, intelligence, education. Guy not intelligent not gonna try pull bird from Cambridge. For sex people just base purely off of physical attraction, so intelligent might be attractive/unattractive based on looks. Intellectual has nothing to do with casual sex. However, scientifically, people who are more intelligent tend to be better looking. Their look is a reflection of how beneficial their gene for suvival. In best interest of humanity for those with better gene to be better looking, so they can attract more mates and have better chance of pass on better gene to next generation. So - yes - intelligent women more attractive on average. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Pickle you wouldn't want me to bang on about my PhD, it probably wouldn't be that interesting to you. And this association with being posh and intelligent, I can only do one. And I'm certainly am not posh ![]() Try me. I’m interested in what interests people | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"Or intimidate you? As in, they’re probably most definitely smarter than you? " If they use there intelligence TO make you feel intimidated, yes. Or if theyre arrogant with it. But If they're friendly, warm and amienable with the intelligence then obviously it's a good thing. But no Im happy to be with someone academically smarted than me..if she's cool | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There are a lot of different forms of intelligence. I dropped out at GCSE. Doesn't mean I'm stupid, simply lacking in the formal form of education. I know people who can do the most complicated maths in their skull but can't hold a conversation to save themselves. Someone who tries to lord their education or inferred superior intelligence over me can get straight in the bin. But I'm happy to learn from people who know more than me. I love to share things I've learned with people who don't have the same life experience or bizarre rabbithole learning I do. Intelligence isn't much of a factor for me. Attitude about it is 💜" I say intelligence to be interpreted as you like. I think when someone is more intelligent than you, as you define it, you just know. And same with when a person is just intelligent; you just know. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I say intelligence to be interpreted as you like. I think when someone is more intelligent than you, as you define it, you just know. And same with when a person is just intelligent; you just know. " I guess I don't interpret it as a whole though. I think everyone in my life I know I know more than in some aspects, and less than in others. Almost everyone will know more than and be better at processing some things than I am, and vice versa depending on what the focus is. I like people who don't worry about intelligence and just be 💜 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I say intelligence to be interpreted as you like. I think when someone is more intelligent than you, as you define it, you just know. And same with when a person is just intelligent; you just know. I guess I don't interpret it as a whole though. I think everyone in my life I know I know more than in some aspects, and less than in others. Almost everyone will know more than and be better at processing some things than I am, and vice versa depending on what the focus is. I like people who don't worry about intelligence and just be 💜" Some things matter to me. And an awareness of some things matters to me. But I respect your POV. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Emotional intelligence is a must. And I prefer those who can do critical thinking. If that's all wrapped up in being nuts too, I'm sold." Brazil nuts? Or pecans? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"For once, I agree with Nero! " • ...is what I am going to place on your epitaph in 200 years time, my bicentennial passionflower. 🧸 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"My IQ is over 150, please send me a lady who is better and I will let you know" Is this a brag or a challenge? By the way mine is higher 😘 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Emotional intelligence is a must. And I prefer those who can do critical thinking. If that's all wrapped up in being nuts too, I'm sold. Brazil nuts? Or pecans?" Nice try. Nuts please, not seeds 😘. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Emotional intelligence is a must. And I prefer those who can do critical thinking. If that's all wrapped up in being nuts too, I'm solid." Nobody asked about your erection, Nicholas ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Emotional intelligence is a must. And I prefer those who can do critical thinking. If that's all wrapped up in being nuts too, I'm solid. Nobody asked about your erection, Nicholas ![]() Harsh Twisty. Harsh. If you prick me, do I not, errr, become more prick-like ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"My IQ is over 150, please send me a lady who is better and I will let you know" Oh oh oh, this reminds me that high IQ doesn't always mean smart. 😬 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"My IQ is over 150, please send me a lady who is better and I will let you know Is this a brag or a challenge? By the way mine is higher 😘" Though she be but little | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"It does as I'm a sapiosexual" A what? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"My IQ is over 150, please send me a lady who is better and I will let you know Oh oh oh, this reminds me that high IQ doesn't always mean smart. 😬" IQ scores are nonsense. It's a deeply flawed method of measuring intelligence. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Don't think intelligence is sexy per se. There has to be that 'spark'. There has to be an initial physical attraction for me, without that everything else comes up short. That said there are plenty of beautiful people I don't find attractive, the invisible spark is missing and so they may have a great face, body whatever, it's not happening. But there still has to be some level of basic attraction, then some evidence of a spark. Some people are essentially sexual and this can override some defects in their attractiveness but not all of it. So for me there has to be some combination of the looks I find attractive and a sexual nature, which is much harder to define. I know some people may same I'm shallow but I say to them when was the last time you walked past a stranger in the street and thought 'OMG look at the political ideological persuasion on that guy' or some other statement based up their beliefs, knowledge, education, or personality, you haven't. It's their eyes, smile, hair, walk legs, thighs, he'll yeah thighs, that you notice first. It's these things that turn your head for that second furtive glance not their IQ. Mrs x" That’s a long way of saying you fancy me. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Don't think intelligence is sexy per se. There has to be that 'spark'. There has to be an initial physical attraction for me, without that everything else comes up short. That said there are plenty of beautiful people I don't find attractive, the invisible spark is missing and so they may have a great face, body whatever, it's not happening. But there still has to be some level of basic attraction, then some evidence of a spark. Some people are essentially sexual and this can override some defects in their attractiveness but not all of it. So for me there has to be some combination of the looks I find attractive and a sexual nature, which is much harder to define. I know some people may same I'm shallow but I say to them when was the last time you walked past a stranger in the street and thought 'OMG look at the political ideological persuasion on that guy' or some other statement based up their beliefs, knowledge, education, or personality, you haven't. It's their eyes, smile, hair, walk legs, thighs, he'll yeah thighs, that you notice first. It's these things that turn your head for that second furtive glance not their IQ. Mrs x That’s a long way of saying you fancy me. " Show me that 'spark' haha Mrs x | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Don't think intelligence is sexy per se. There has to be that 'spark'. There has to be an initial physical attraction for me, without that everything else comes up short. That said there are plenty of beautiful people I don't find attractive, the invisible spark is missing and so they may have a great face, body whatever, it's not happening. But there still has to be some level of basic attraction, then some evidence of a spark. Some people are essentially sexual and this can override some defects in their attractiveness but not all of it. So for me there has to be some combination of the looks I find attractive and a sexual nature, which is much harder to define. I know some people may same I'm shallow but I say to them when was the last time you walked past a stranger in the street and thought 'OMG look at the political ideological persuasion on that guy' or some other statement based up their beliefs, knowledge, education, or personality, you haven't. It's their eyes, smile, hair, walk legs, thighs, he'll yeah thighs, that you notice first. It's these things that turn your head for that second furtive glance not their IQ. Mrs x That’s a long way of saying you fancy me. Show me that 'spark' haha Mrs x" You mean my cock? Ok I’ll DM it to you. X | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Don't think intelligence is sexy per se. There has to be that 'spark'. There has to be an initial physical attraction for me, without that everything else comes up short. That said there are plenty of beautiful people I don't find attractive, the invisible spark is missing and so they may have a great face, body whatever, it's not happening. But there still has to be some level of basic attraction, then some evidence of a spark. Some people are essentially sexual and this can override some defects in their attractiveness but not all of it. So for me there has to be some combination of the looks I find attractive and a sexual nature, which is much harder to define. I know some people may same I'm shallow but I say to them when was the last time you walked past a stranger in the street and thought 'OMG look at the political ideological persuasion on that guy' or some other statement based up their beliefs, knowledge, education, or personality, you haven't. It's their eyes, smile, hair, walk legs, thighs, he'll yeah thighs, that you notice first. It's these things that turn your head for that second furtive glance not their IQ. Mrs x That’s a long way of saying you fancy me. Show me that 'spark' haha Mrs x You mean my cock? Ok I’ll DM it to you. X" Will ot fit in my inbox, not a euphemism before you ask haha x | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Don't think intelligence is sexy per se. There has to be that 'spark'. There has to be an initial physical attraction for me, without that everything else comes up short. That said there are plenty of beautiful people I don't find attractive, the invisible spark is missing and so they may have a great face, body whatever, it's not happening. But there still has to be some level of basic attraction, then some evidence of a spark. Some people are essentially sexual and this can override some defects in their attractiveness but not all of it. So for me there has to be some combination of the looks I find attractive and a sexual nature, which is much harder to define. I know some people may same I'm shallow but I say to them when was the last time you walked past a stranger in the street and thought 'OMG look at the political ideological persuasion on that guy' or some other statement based up their beliefs, knowledge, education, or personality, you haven't. It's their eyes, smile, hair, walk legs, thighs, he'll yeah thighs, that you notice first. It's these things that turn your head for that second furtive glance not their IQ. Mrs x That’s a long way of saying you fancy me. Show me that 'spark' haha Mrs x You mean my cock? Ok I’ll DM it to you. XWill ot fit in my inbox, not a euphemism before you ask haha x" Let’s find out. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Don't think intelligence is sexy per se. There has to be that 'spark'. There has to be an initial physical attraction for me, without that everything else comes up short. That said there are plenty of beautiful people I don't find attractive, the invisible spark is missing and so they may have a great face, body whatever, it's not happening. But there still has to be some level of basic attraction, then some evidence of a spark. Some people are essentially sexual and this can override some defects in their attractiveness but not all of it. So for me there has to be some combination of the looks I find attractive and a sexual nature, which is much harder to define. I know some people may same I'm shallow but I say to them when was the last time you walked past a stranger in the street and thought 'OMG look at the political ideological persuasion on that guy' or some other statement based up their beliefs, knowledge, education, or personality, you haven't. It's their eyes, smile, hair, walk legs, thighs, he'll yeah thighs, that you notice first. It's these things that turn your head for that second furtive glance not their IQ. Mrs x That’s a long way of saying you fancy me. Show me that 'spark' haha Mrs x You mean my cock? Ok I’ll DM it to you. XWill ot fit in my inbox, not a euphemism before you ask haha x Let’s find out. " Oooh it fit, Mrs x | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Don't think intelligence is sexy per se. There has to be that 'spark'. There has to be an initial physical attraction for me, without that everything else comes up short. That said there are plenty of beautiful people I don't find attractive, the invisible spark is missing and so they may have a great face, body whatever, it's not happening. But there still has to be some level of basic attraction, then some evidence of a spark. Some people are essentially sexual and this can override some defects in their attractiveness but not all of it. So for me there has to be some combination of the looks I find attractive and a sexual nature, which is much harder to define. I know some people may same I'm shallow but I say to them when was the last time you walked past a stranger in the street and thought 'OMG look at the political ideological persuasion on that guy' or some other statement based up their beliefs, knowledge, education, or personality, you haven't. It's their eyes, smile, hair, walk legs, thighs, he'll yeah thighs, that you notice first. It's these things that turn your head for that second furtive glance not their IQ. Mrs x That’s a long way of saying you fancy me. Show me that 'spark' haha Mrs x You mean my cock? Ok I’ll DM it to you. XWill ot fit in my inbox, not a euphemism before you ask haha x Let’s find out. Oooh it fit, Mrs x" It’s only a little 🍆 ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Don't think intelligence is sexy per se. There has to be that 'spark'. There has to be an initial physical attraction for me, without that everything else comes up short. That said there are plenty of beautiful people I don't find attractive, the invisible spark is missing and so they may have a great face, body whatever, it's not happening. But there still has to be some level of basic attraction, then some evidence of a spark. Some people are essentially sexual and this can override some defects in their attractiveness but not all of it. So for me there has to be some combination of the looks I find attractive and a sexual nature, which is much harder to define. I know some people may same I'm shallow but I say to them when was the last time you walked past a stranger in the street and thought 'OMG look at the political ideological persuasion on that guy' or some other statement based up their beliefs, knowledge, education, or personality, you haven't. It's their eyes, smile, hair, walk legs, thighs, he'll yeah thighs, that you notice first. It's these things that turn your head for that second furtive glance not their IQ. Mrs x That’s a long way of saying you fancy me. Show me that 'spark' haha Mrs x You mean my cock? Ok I’ll DM it to you. XWill ot fit in my inbox, not a euphemism before you ask haha x Let’s find out. Oooh it fit, Mrs x It’s only a little 🍆 ![]() That's ok I have a small inbox, contrary to the rumours, Mrs x | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Don't think intelligence is sexy per se. There has to be that 'spark'. There has to be an initial physical attraction for me, without that everything else comes up short. That said there are plenty of beautiful people I don't find attractive, the invisible spark is missing and so they may have a great face, body whatever, it's not happening. But there still has to be some level of basic attraction, then some evidence of a spark. Some people are essentially sexual and this can override some defects in their attractiveness but not all of it. So for me there has to be some combination of the looks I find attractive and a sexual nature, which is much harder to define. I know some people may same I'm shallow but I say to them when was the last time you walked past a stranger in the street and thought 'OMG look at the political ideological persuasion on that guy' or some other statement based up their beliefs, knowledge, education, or personality, you haven't. It's their eyes, smile, hair, walk legs, thighs, he'll yeah thighs, that you notice first. It's these things that turn your head for that second furtive glance not their IQ. Mrs x That’s a long way of saying you fancy me. Show me that 'spark' haha Mrs x You mean my cock? Ok I’ll DM it to you. XWill ot fit in my inbox, not a euphemism before you ask haha x Let’s find out. Oooh it fit, Mrs x It’s only a little 🍆 ![]() Stop. You’re turning me on. Boing . 🍆 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Don't think intelligence is sexy per se. There has to be that 'spark'. There has to be an initial physical attraction for me, without that everything else comes up short. That said there are plenty of beautiful people I don't find attractive, the invisible spark is missing and so they may have a great face, body whatever, it's not happening. But there still has to be some level of basic attraction, then some evidence of a spark. Some people are essentially sexual and this can override some defects in their attractiveness but not all of it. So for me there has to be some combination of the looks I find attractive and a sexual nature, which is much harder to define. I know some people may same I'm shallow but I say to them when was the last time you walked past a stranger in the street and thought 'OMG look at the political ideological persuasion on that guy' or some other statement based up their beliefs, knowledge, education, or personality, you haven't. It's their eyes, smile, hair, walk legs, thighs, he'll yeah thighs, that you notice first. It's these things that turn your head for that second furtive glance not their IQ. Mrs x That’s a long way of saying you fancy me. Show me that 'spark' haha Mrs x You mean my cock? Ok I’ll DM it to you. XWill ot fit in my inbox, not a euphemism before you ask haha x Let’s find out. Oooh it fit, Mrs x It’s only a little 🍆 ![]() Must be losing my touch it looks the same size haha, Mrs x | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Did someone say boing? I like a good boing. " https://m.fabswingers.com/profile/mr.stephen.pickle Here you go | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Don't think intelligence is sexy per se. There has to be that 'spark'. There has to be an initial physical attraction for me, without that everything else comes up short. That said there are plenty of beautiful people I don't find attractive, the invisible spark is missing and so they may have a great face, body whatever, it's not happening. But there still has to be some level of basic attraction, then some evidence of a spark. Some people are essentially sexual and this can override some defects in their attractiveness but not all of it. So for me there has to be some combination of the looks I find attractive and a sexual nature, which is much harder to define. I know some people may same I'm shallow but I say to them when was the last time you walked past a stranger in the street and thought 'OMG look at the political ideological persuasion on that guy' or some other statement based up their beliefs, knowledge, education, or personality, you haven't. It's their eyes, smile, hair, walk legs, thighs, he'll yeah thighs, that you notice first. It's these things that turn your head for that second furtive glance not their IQ. Mrs x That’s a long way of saying you fancy me. Show me that 'spark' haha Mrs x You mean my cock? Ok I’ll DM it to you. XWill ot fit in my inbox, not a euphemism before you ask haha x Let’s find out. Oooh it fit, Mrs x It’s only a little 🍆 ![]() You bastard. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Did someone say boing? I like a good boing. " You still going home tomorrow? Mrs x | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Did someone say boing? I like a good boing. You still going home tomorrow? Mrs x" I'm in some kind of discharge lounge thingy so I bloody hope so! I've ordered a Pickle sandwich for my return ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Don't think intelligence is sexy per se. There has to be that 'spark'. There has to be an initial physical attraction for me, without that everything else comes up short. That said there are plenty of beautiful people I don't find attractive, the invisible spark is missing and so they may have a great face, body whatever, it's not happening. But there still has to be some level of basic attraction, then some evidence of a spark. Some people are essentially sexual and this can override some defects in their attractiveness but not all of it. So for me there has to be some combination of the looks I find attractive and a sexual nature, which is much harder to define. I know some people may same I'm shallow but I say to them when was the last time you walked past a stranger in the street and thought 'OMG look at the political ideological persuasion on that guy' or some other statement based up their beliefs, knowledge, education, or personality, you haven't. It's their eyes, smile, hair, walk legs, thighs, he'll yeah thighs, that you notice first. It's these things that turn your head for that second furtive glance not their IQ. Mrs x That’s a long way of saying you fancy me. Show me that 'spark' haha Mrs x You mean my cock? Ok I’ll DM it to you. XWill ot fit in my inbox, not a euphemism before you ask haha x Let’s find out. Oooh it fit, Mrs x It’s only a little 🍆 ![]() It's reflects worse on me. Only a couple of years ago I'd only have to give you 'the look' and it would guarantee at least an extra inch. I try and give the look now and it all comes crashing down, in certain lighting quite spectacular ly, Mrs x | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Depends how that intelligence comes through. Curiosity is a key indicator of intelligence for me amd I think that is sexy as hell. As is an ability to say, I don't know the answer to that, lets go find out. " Yes, very much this! Saves me formulating sentences ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Did someone say boing? I like a good boing. You still going home tomorrow? Mrs x I'm in some kind of discharge lounge thingy so I bloody hope so! I've ordered a Pickle sandwich for my return ![]() Hope it's tomorrow and you're able to relax a bit more than being there, Mrs x | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Show me that 'spark' haha Mrs x You mean my cock? Ok I’ll DM it to you. XWill ot fit in my inbox, not a euphemism before you ask haha x Let’s find out. Oooh it fit, Mrs x It’s only a little 🍆 ![]() You’re many things, Mrs, and one of them is attractive. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Did someone say boing? I like a good boing. You still going home tomorrow? Mrs x I'm in some kind of discharge lounge thingy so I bloody hope so! I've ordered a Pickle sandwich for my return ![]() You want me to fuck you? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Did someone say boing? I like a good boing. You still going home tomorrow? Mrs x I'm in some kind of discharge lounge thingy so I bloody hope so! I've ordered a Pickle sandwich for my return ![]() I'm going to go and spread eagle myself on our bed as soon as the Return Home Inspection Team leave me be. Mr KC will then be home mid afternoon 🥳 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Did someone say boing? I like a good boing. You still going home tomorrow? Mrs x I'm in some kind of discharge lounge thingy so I bloody hope so! I've ordered a Pickle sandwich for my return ![]() I think that's on my prescription, yes. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Depends on their other traits and if they are a good person or not. Intelligence by itself is absolutely cool with me. I love to learn, so I'd be happy if a person wanted to share their knowledge and experience." And I agree with this summation | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Show me that 'spark' haha Mrs x You mean my cock? Ok I’ll DM it to you. XWill ot fit in my inbox, not a euphemism before you ask haha x Let’s find out. Oooh it fit, Mrs x It’s only a little 🍆 ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Is she hot? 😉 Or, more, do I fancy her? If not, her intelligence alone won't turn me on. I'd (probably*) be interested, impressed, engaged and want to talk to her, but not automatically turned on. (*I say probably as intelligent doesn't always mean interesting or likeable!)" Said better and more succinctly than I did. I believe intelligence for men is not a factor in finding woman attractive. If it was then there'd be a site designed where guys could thrap off to the site of a well formed thesis by a genius female intellectual. If there was the slightest level of kink in this area some guy would have developed 'academic' porn sites, with filthy diplomas, degrees and PHDs on it. But they haven't so I think it doesn't really exist. Just a bit of virtue signalling g to the smarter woman out there rather than coming up with the honest answer of 'no it's not your brains, it's you tits'... And to be honest guys have form for this kind of thing, saying something that's not true to improve their chances of a fuck at the end of the night. Ask any wife who has asked her hubby if her bum looks big in this, only for hubby not even bothered to look up before replying, 'No dear it doesn't look big in that'... not sure they can help themselves, come on guys just admit it it's all about the tits, arse, legs, whatever we'll before you even think about our brains... Mrs x | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Is she hot? 😉 Or, more, do I fancy her? If not, her intelligence alone won't turn me on. I'd (probably*) be interested, impressed, engaged and want to talk to her, but not automatically turned on. (*I say probably as intelligent doesn't always mean interesting or likeable!)Said better and more succinctly than I did. I believe intelligence for men is not a factor in finding woman attractive. If it was then there'd be a site designed where guys could thrap off to the site of a well formed thesis by a genius female intellectual. If there was the slightest level of kink in this area some guy would have developed 'academic' porn sites, with filthy diplomas, degrees and PHDs on it. But they haven't so I think it doesn't really exist. Just a bit of virtue signalling g to the smarter woman out there rather than coming up with the honest answer of 'no it's not your brains, it's you tits'... And to be honest guys have form for this kind of thing, saying something that's not true to improve their chances of a fuck at the end of the night. Ask any wife who has asked her hubby if her bum looks big in this, only for hubby not even bothered to look up before replying, 'No dear it doesn't look big in that'... not sure they can help themselves, come on guys just admit it it's all about the tits, arse, legs, whatever we'll before you even think about our brains... Mrs x" My husband will give me a truthful answer to such questions! When I commented that I looked like shit/knackered when he visited the hospital, he agreed I did ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Is she hot? 😉 Or, more, do I fancy her? If not, her intelligence alone won't turn me on. I'd (probably*) be interested, impressed, engaged and want to talk to her, but not automatically turned on. (*I say probably as intelligent doesn't always mean interesting or likeable!)Said better and more succinctly than I did. I believe intelligence for men is not a factor in finding woman attractive. If it was then there'd be a site designed where guys could thrap off to the site of a well formed thesis by a genius female intellectual. If there was the slightest level of kink in this area some guy would have developed 'academic' porn sites, with filthy diplomas, degrees and PHDs on it. But they haven't so I think it doesn't really exist. Just a bit of virtue signalling g to the smarter woman out there rather than coming up with the honest answer of 'no it's not your brains, it's you tits'... And to be honest guys have form for this kind of thing, saying something that's not true to improve their chances of a fuck at the end of the night. Ask any wife who has asked her hubby if her bum looks big in this, only for hubby not even bothered to look up before replying, 'No dear it doesn't look big in that'... not sure they can help themselves, come on guys just admit it it's all about the tits, arse, legs, whatever we'll before you even think about our brains... Mrs x" I present to you the academic journal "Porn Studies" - totally legit too https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/rprn20 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Is she hot? 😉 Or, more, do I fancy her? If not, her intelligence alone won't turn me on. I'd (probably*) be interested, impressed, engaged and want to talk to her, but not automatically turned on. (*I say probably as intelligent doesn't always mean interesting or likeable!)Said better and more succinctly than I did. I believe intelligence for men is not a factor in finding woman attractive. If it was then there'd be a site designed where guys could thrap off to the site of a well formed thesis by a genius female intellectual. If there was the slightest level of kink in this area some guy would have developed 'academic' porn sites, with filthy diplomas, degrees and PHDs on it. But they haven't so I think it doesn't really exist. Just a bit of virtue signalling g to the smarter woman out there rather than coming up with the honest answer of 'no it's not your brains, it's you tits'... And to be honest guys have form for this kind of thing, saying something that's not true to improve their chances of a fuck at the end of the night. Ask any wife who has asked her hubby if her bum looks big in this, only for hubby not even bothered to look up before replying, 'No dear it doesn't look big in that'... not sure they can help themselves, come on guys just admit it it's all about the tits, arse, legs, whatever we'll before you even think about our brains... Mrs x" I think I'm not going as far as that - it sure *can* be a factor in finding a woman attractive. But, for me at least, not enough on its own if I don't find her physically attractive too. The world is full of clever women I don't fancy. It's also full of lots of not so clever women I don't fancy. (And all depending on mutual attraction and all that jazz, obviously) | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Is she hot? 😉 Or, more, do I fancy her? If not, her intelligence alone won't turn me on. I'd (probably*) be interested, impressed, engaged and want to talk to her, but not automatically turned on. (*I say probably as intelligent doesn't always mean interesting or likeable!)Said better and more succinctly than I did. I believe intelligence for men is not a factor in finding woman attractive. If it was then there'd be a site designed where guys could thrap off to the site of a well formed thesis by a genius female intellectual. If there was the slightest level of kink in this area some guy would have developed 'academic' porn sites, with filthy diplomas, degrees and PHDs on it. But they haven't so I think it doesn't really exist. Just a bit of virtue signalling g to the smarter woman out there rather than coming up with the honest answer of 'no it's not your brains, it's you tits'... And to be honest guys have form for this kind of thing, saying something that's not true to improve their chances of a fuck at the end of the night. Ask any wife who has asked her hubby if her bum looks big in this, only for hubby not even bothered to look up before replying, 'No dear it doesn't look big in that'... not sure they can help themselves, come on guys just admit it it's all about the tits, arse, legs, whatever we'll before you even think about our brains... Mrs x I present to you the academic journal "Porn Studies" - totally legit too https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/rprn20" Very smart woman, discussingand researching porn but I did find... "Expanding experiences and anxieties: gender-identity and sexual-orientation differences in attitudes toward synthetic pornography", somewhat derivative. But come on, guys aren't pulling their puds to it are they, I mean that video with the two girls, one cup garnered much more views on the Internet than any thesis from one of the leading female sexologists. Tits are sexy, in depth, analytical discussion about why the males of the species finds tits sexy is less sexy than just looking at said tits, Mrs x | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Is she hot? 😉 Or, more, do I fancy her? If not, her intelligence alone won't turn me on. I'd (probably*) be interested, impressed, engaged and want to talk to her, but not automatically turned on. (*I say probably as intelligent doesn't always mean interesting or likeable!)Said better and more succinctly than I did. I believe intelligence for men is not a factor in finding woman attractive. If it was then there'd be a site designed where guys could thrap off to the site of a well formed thesis by a genius female intellectual. If there was the slightest level of kink in this area some guy would have developed 'academic' porn sites, with filthy diplomas, degrees and PHDs on it. But they haven't so I think it doesn't really exist. Just a bit of virtue signalling g to the smarter woman out there rather than coming up with the honest answer of 'no it's not your brains, it's you tits'... And to be honest guys have form for this kind of thing, saying something that's not true to improve their chances of a fuck at the end of the night. Ask any wife who has asked her hubby if her bum looks big in this, only for hubby not even bothered to look up before replying, 'No dear it doesn't look big in that'... not sure they can help themselves, come on guys just admit it it's all about the tits, arse, legs, whatever we'll before you even think about our brains... Mrs x I think I'm not going as far as that - it sure *can* be a factor in finding a woman attractive. But, for me at least, not enough on its own if I don't find her physically attractive too. The world is full of clever women I don't fancy. It's also full of lots of not so clever women I don't fancy. (And all depending on mutual attraction and all that jazz, obviously)" Physical attraction must come first. You can ascertain that almost immediately so long as the woman falls within your parameters of 'sexiness'. You can establish this from a still photo. You cannot do that with intelligence, it requires much more time and effort to establish if the woman has a level of intelligence you like. And even then physical attraction would win over poor intelligence. You would be thinking I'd just fuck her and leave her, it's not like you'd be stuck with the bimbo. I know this is a shallow depiction of men here but I don't think I'm too far from the mark. Guys are more likely to have one night stands with attractive woman they found dumber than they'd normally like rather than unattractive woman that were smarter than they normally went for. This is based obviously on situations we're guys actually had a choice in the matter. Mrs x | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Neither. They are who and what they are, and who and what they are not. Some intelligent women (but people) are insufferable, so therefore a turn off. Some are awesome and clearly enjoyable to be a round, therefore a turn on. Same goes for those "lacking" in intelligence. Intelligence alone is irrelevant. " this | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Is she hot? 😉 Or, more, do I fancy her? If not, her intelligence alone won't turn me on. I'd (probably*) be interested, impressed, engaged and want to talk to her, but not automatically turned on. (*I say probably as intelligent doesn't always mean interesting or likeable!)" You my guy are honest !! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Not attracted to ladies but yes intelligence is important to me. I like big diction and I cannot lie 😉 It’s also worth mentioning that our own experience of what is or isn’t intelligent is very much in the eye of the beholder. To me intelligence is not down to education level or class. Intelligence more about an individual curiosity, passion and questioning nature. Its not about the facts that they know it’s about their never ending curiosity to learn. If a man has unwavering stubborn beliefs, repeats dogma, is rigidly unquestionably prejudiced,exhibits mob mentality or an unwillingness to learn or enter discourse that might challenge their views…. Meh he instantly becomes unsexy. Give me a man who can talk about the things he’s passionate about, a man who is always curious and learning, someone who’s always radically willing to learn and who will challenge me and the way I think. I enjoy long talks about all sorts of things and I find learning about someone’s interests fascinating, whether I share that interest or not. " I want to do unspeakable things to these words. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Or intimidate you? As in, they’re probably most definitely smarter than you? " No I’d say about 99% smarter than me not the sharpest tool in the box It’s not about the trip It’s the journey ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"God I'd love to meet an intelligent woman. As it is, I keep getting people (men) telling me that my grammar/writing style makes them scared so they spend longer to write messages to me?? " • If they are inspired and instilled to be prudent in their grammar with you then surely that's a lovely and delightful thing? 🩶 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"God I'd love to meet an intelligent woman. As it is, I keep getting people (men) telling me that my grammar/writing style makes them scared so they spend longer to write messages to me?? " You know sometimes I find sort of the opposite. That it's poor spelling and grammar that's scares people off me. However that doesn't both me, if anything it helps with the filtering (as I'm sure it does for you). Regardless of typos and grammar it's genrally easy enough to understand what someone is saying. So if someone is more bother by my spelling than the content of what I have to say they're probably bot a good match anyway. My dyslexia has no correlation to my intellect, character or world veiw. Mr | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"God I'd love to meet an intelligent woman. As it is, I keep getting people (men) telling me that my grammar/writing style makes them scared so they spend longer to write messages to me?? " Nevertheless, a well written message is a pleasure to receive. As a starter for 10, when people say intelligent, do they mean: intelligent, educated or cultured? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Or intimidate you? As in, they’re probably most definitely smarter than you? " Yes really like intelligent women | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Or intimidate you? As in, they’re probably most definitely smarter than you? " It’s not just a turn on, it’s an absolutely massive turn on, but then I’m a sapiosexual. Plus, it helps them appreciate my own unique charm and genius ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"God I'd love to meet an intelligent woman. As it is, I keep getting people (men) telling me that my grammar/writing style makes them scared so they spend longer to write messages to me?? Nevertheless, a well written message is a pleasure to receive. As a starter for 10, when people say intelligent, do they mean: intelligent, educated or cultured?" The phrase cultured makes me cringe for some reason. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"God I'd love to meet an intelligent woman. As it is, I keep getting people (men) telling me that my grammar/writing style makes them scared so they spend longer to write messages to me?? Nevertheless, a well written message is a pleasure to receive. As a starter for 10, when people say intelligent, do they mean: intelligent, educated or cultured? The phrase cultured makes me cringe for some reason. " Cultural difference. Not cultural deprivation. #ALevelSociology | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"God I'd love to meet an intelligent woman. As it is, I keep getting people (men) telling me that my grammar/writing style makes them scared so they spend longer to write messages to me?? Nevertheless, a well written message is a pleasure to receive. As a starter for 10, when people say intelligent, do they mean: intelligent, educated or cultured? The phrase cultured makes me cringe for some reason. Cultural difference. Not cultural deprivation. #ALevelSociology " Quite often I feel that manifests in the difference between acculturation and appropriation. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Not attracted to ladies but yes intelligence is important to me. I like big diction and I cannot lie 😉 It’s also worth mentioning that our own experience of what is or isn’t intelligent is very much in the eye of the beholder. To me intelligence is not down to education level or class. Intelligence more about an individual curiosity, passion and questioning nature. Its not about the facts that they know it’s about their never ending curiosity to learn. If a man has unwavering stubborn beliefs, repeats dogma, is rigidly unquestionably prejudiced,exhibits mob mentality or an unwillingness to learn or enter discourse that might challenge their views…. Meh he instantly becomes unsexy. Give me a man who can talk about the things he’s passionate about, a man who is always curious and learning, someone who’s always radically willing to learn and who will challenge me and the way I think. I enjoy long talks about all sorts of things and I find learning about someone’s interests fascinating, whether I share that interest or not. " Spot on! There's a great attraction in someone who likes to get into a discussion and debate about things and you can have multiple interesting conversations about anything and everything whether topical or not. I'm always open to learning things and listening to opinions and not being all stubborn with my own beliefs and find it very attractive when the other person is the same. Would make me want to spend more time with them | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Intelligent women don't turn me on but I really admire people like Prof Alice Roberts, Mary Beard et al " Prof Roberts is a case in point. Very smart and very attractive. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Intelligent women don't turn me on but I really admire people like Prof Alice Roberts, Mary Beard et al Prof Roberts is a case in point. Very smart and very attractive. " She is attractive. But I would still find her attractive if she was "stupid". Is she attractive *because* she's clever, or just that she's an attractive woman, who also happens to be clever? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Intelligent women don't turn me on but I really admire people like Prof Alice Roberts, Mary Beard et al Prof Roberts is a case in point. Very smart and very attractive. She is attractive. But I would still find her attractive if she was "stupid". Is she attractive *because* she's clever, or just that she's an attractive woman, who also happens to be clever?" It's a good question, to be fair. Quite often you hear/see people talking about finding a certain person (Rachel Reilly, for example) attractive because of her brain. But she's a beautiful lady to begin with. If she looked like Sloth from The Goonies but still had her intelligence, would people still find her sexy? Highly doubtful. Most of the time, it tends to be pretty people that just happen to be intelligent, rather than "ugly" ones. It's entirely superficial and perhaps not many would admit that. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Intelligent women don't turn me on but I really admire people like Prof Alice Roberts, Mary Beard et al Prof Roberts is a case in point. Very smart and very attractive. She is attractive. But I would still find her attractive if she was "stupid". Is she attractive *because* she's clever, or just that she's an attractive woman, who also happens to be clever?" I'm straight so I'm not sexually attracted to her, I find her manner, confidence, the way she carries herself, her obvious passion for her subjects, her keen willingness to share her knowledge, the depth of that knowledge and the dedication and intelligence required to achieve it and lack of patronising behaviour very attractive on a personal level. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Intelligent women don't turn me on but I really admire people like Prof Alice Roberts, Mary Beard et al Prof Roberts is a case in point. Very smart and very attractive. She is attractive. But I would still find her attractive if she was "stupid". Is she attractive *because* she's clever, or just that she's an attractive woman, who also happens to be clever? It's a good question, to be fair. Quite often you hear/see people talking about finding a certain person (Rachel Reilly, for example) attractive because of her brain. But she's a beautiful lady to begin with. If she looked like Sloth from The Goonies but still had her intelligence, would people still find her sexy? Highly doubtful. Most of the time, it tends to be pretty people that just happen to be intelligent, rather than "ugly" ones. It's entirely superficial and perhaps not many would admit that." I find Mary Beard an attractive person but I guess we're talking sexually here | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Intelligent women don't turn me on but I really admire people like Prof Alice Roberts, Mary Beard et al Prof Roberts is a case in point. Very smart and very attractive. She is attractive. But I would still find her attractive if she was "stupid". Is she attractive *because* she's clever, or just that she's an attractive woman, who also happens to be clever? It's a good question, to be fair. Quite often you hear/see people talking about finding a certain person (Rachel Reilly, for example) attractive because of her brain. But she's a beautiful lady to begin with. If she looked like Sloth from The Goonies but still had her intelligence, would people still find her sexy? Highly doubtful. Most of the time, it tends to be pretty people that just happen to be intelligent, rather than "ugly" ones. It's entirely superficial and perhaps not many would admit that." I value intelligence above physical features. Someone could be very conventionally attractive but if they're a moron it's a huge turn off for me. The older I get the more true this gets too. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Intelligent women don't turn me on but I really admire people like Prof Alice Roberts, Mary Beard et al Prof Roberts is a case in point. Very smart and very attractive. She is attractive. But I would still find her attractive if she was "stupid". Is she attractive *because* she's clever, or just that she's an attractive woman, who also happens to be clever? It's a good question, to be fair. Quite often you hear/see people talking about finding a certain person (Rachel Reilly, for example) attractive because of her brain. But she's a beautiful lady to begin with. If she looked like Sloth from The Goonies but still had her intelligence, would people still find her sexy? Highly doubtful. Most of the time, it tends to be pretty people that just happen to be intelligent, rather than "ugly" ones. It's entirely superficial and perhaps not many would admit that." Spot on, great assessment. Mrs x | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Intelligent women don't turn me on but I really admire people like Prof Alice Roberts, Mary Beard et al Prof Roberts is a case in point. Very smart and very attractive. She is attractive. But I would still find her attractive if she was "stupid". Is she attractive *because* she's clever, or just that she's an attractive woman, who also happens to be clever? I'm straight so I'm not sexually attracted to her, I find her manner, confidence, the way she carries herself, her obvious passion for her subjects, her keen willingness to share her knowledge, the depth of that knowledge and the dedication and intelligence required to achieve it and lack of patronising behaviour very attractive on a personal level. " Yes, I agree with all that. I guess I just find it hard to separate the two. For me, intelligence will make someone I find physically attractive even more attractive. But I need physical attraction too if I am to fancy someone. I make no claims to be a sapiosexual, so I guess that explains it! I'm base. ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Intelligent women don't turn me on but I really admire people like Prof Alice Roberts, Mary Beard et al Prof Roberts is a case in point. Very smart and very attractive. She is attractive. But I would still find her attractive if she was "stupid". Is she attractive *because* she's clever, or just that she's an attractive woman, who also happens to be clever? I'm straight so I'm not sexually attracted to her, I find her manner, confidence, the way she carries herself, her obvious passion for her subjects, her keen willingness to share her knowledge, the depth of that knowledge and the dedication and intelligence required to achieve it and lack of patronising behaviour very attractive on a personal level. Yes, I agree with all that. I guess I just find it hard to separate the two. For me, intelligence will make someone I find physically attractive even more attractive. But I need physical attraction too if I am to fancy someone. I make no claims to be a sapiosexual, so I guess that explains it! I'm base. ![]() If I was bi I'd definitely be physically attracted to Prof Roberts because I like her leather jackets ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Intelligent women don't turn me on but I really admire people like Prof Alice Roberts, Mary Beard et al Prof Roberts is a case in point. Very smart and very attractive. She is attractive. But I would still find her attractive if she was "stupid". Is she attractive *because* she's clever, or just that she's an attractive woman, who also happens to be clever? It's a good question, to be fair. Quite often you hear/see people talking about finding a certain person (Rachel Reilly, for example) attractive because of her brain. But she's a beautiful lady to begin with. If she looked like Sloth from The Goonies but still had her intelligence, would people still find her sexy? Highly doubtful. Most of the time, it tends to be pretty people that just happen to be intelligent, rather than "ugly" ones. It's entirely superficial and perhaps not many would admit that. I value intelligence above physical features. Someone could be very conventionally attractive but if they're a moron it's a huge turn off for me. The older I get the more true this gets too." But would you find them a turn on if they were highly intelligent but a complete butt ugly munter ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Or intimidate you? As in, they’re probably most definitely smarter than you? " Intelligent women.... Big boner. You know who you are Meli. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
back to top | ![]() |