Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Now I'm not condoning this in anyway because as you say, delivery drivers etc. shouldn't be subjected to your kink without consent and it's right that charges can be brought, especially if the roles were reversed... However, in this instance, wouldn't the whole situation have been avoided had she just looked through the eye-hole of the door? 🤔 Sorry, let the intrusive thoughts win there... 😅" "If the roles are reversed" Nope. The law doesn't discriminate. People have found themselves in trouble for doing this. The OP raises some very sensible, sobering points. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Now I'm not condoning this in anyway because as you say, delivery drivers etc. shouldn't be subjected to your kink without consent and it's right that charges can be brought, especially if the roles were reversed... However, in this instance, wouldn't the whole situation have been avoided had she just looked through the eye-hole of the door? 🤔 Sorry, let the intrusive thoughts win there... 😅 "If the roles are reversed" Nope. The law doesn't discriminate. People have found themselves in trouble for doing this. The OP raises some very sensible, sobering points. " That's what I meant, some women see it as fun and harmless but I'm sure they wouldn't think the same if a guy answered the door naked to a female driver. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Now I'm not condoning this in anyway because as you say, delivery drivers etc. shouldn't be subjected to your kink without consent and it's right that charges can be brought, especially if the roles were reversed... However, in this instance, wouldn't the whole situation have been avoided had she just looked through the eye-hole of the door? 🤔 Sorry, let the intrusive thoughts win there... 😅 "If the roles are reversed" Nope. The law doesn't discriminate. People have found themselves in trouble for doing this. The OP raises some very sensible, sobering points. That's what I meant, some women see it as fun and harmless but I'm sure they wouldn't think the same if a guy answered the door naked to a female driver." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's really, really easy to not involve other people in your kinks. So easy that I honestly have a hard time understanding why anyone does it. " The mind a wonderful thing xxx | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's really, really easy to not involve other people in your kinks. So easy that I honestly have a hard time understanding why anyone does it. The mind a wonderful thing xxx" I wish my mind was | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The author is absolutely correct here. Feel free to read this article from the Lancashire Telegraph. The title says it all. https://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/news/1852598.man-placed-sex-offenders-register-answering-door-naked/" And this is why: "He told police he was trying to scare the children away because youngsters were calling at his house too often." Had he simply opened the door, closed it and stated to police he was a naturist, he would likely not have been prosecuted. Please note, my statement is NOT a sign I agree with the actions! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's curious, because nudity alone is not illegal (either in public or on private property) and naturism is a non sexual lifestyle that many people have. The law on nudity is that you cannot expose your genitals such that you intend someone to see them and that you cannot be expose your genitals intending to cause harm or distress. There is no law banning nudity, no law about exposed breasts etc. It's all under Section 66 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003. Basically, for an offence to have taken place (for any gender) would need exposed genitals, deliberately intending someone else to see and with a reasonable suggestion of intent to cause harm/distress. I personally wouldn't want or expect to see a nude person answering the door, but in law, no offence is committed by simply standing there and accepting a delivery. The cases I've found where someone WAS prosecuted (male and female) involved nudity plus things like masturbation or deliberate wangling of body parts towards people in a manner to cause fear/distress. E.g. https://metro.co.uk/2022/08/15/northwich-woman-fined-200-for-masturbating-on-bench-outside-waitrose-17183485/" So what you are saying is: I can't put a fake moustache and googley eyes on my penis and thrust it through the letter box just as postie is about to deliver some letters? But I can answer the door bollock naked wearing a fake moustache and comedy glasses on my face as long as I'm not getting a sexual kink from it? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's curious, because nudity alone is not illegal (either in public or on private property) and naturism is a non sexual lifestyle that many people have. The law on nudity is that you cannot expose your genitals such that you intend someone to see them and that you cannot be expose your genitals intending to cause harm or distress. There is no law banning nudity, no law about exposed breasts etc. It's all under Section 66 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003. Basically, for an offence to have taken place (for any gender) would need exposed genitals, deliberately intending someone else to see and with a reasonable suggestion of intent to cause harm/distress. I personally wouldn't want or expect to see a nude person answering the door, but in law, no offence is committed by simply standing there and accepting a delivery. The cases I've found where someone WAS prosecuted (male and female) involved nudity plus things like masturbation or deliberate wangling of body parts towards people in a manner to cause fear/distress. E.g. https://metro.co.uk/2022/08/15/northwich-woman-fined-200-for-masturbating-on-bench-outside-waitrose-17183485/ So what you are saying is: I can't put a fake moustache and googley eyes on my penis and thrust it through the letter box just as postie is about to deliver some letters? But I can answer the door bollock naked wearing a fake moustache and comedy glasses on my face as long as I'm not getting a sexual kink from it? " Technically, by the letter of the law, yes. Someone attempting to prosecute the latter would need to demonstrate an intent to cause fear or distress. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's curious, because nudity alone is not illegal (either in public or on private property) and naturism is a non sexual lifestyle that many people have. The law on nudity is that you cannot expose your genitals such that you intend someone to see them and that you cannot be expose your genitals intending to cause harm or distress. There is no law banning nudity, no law about exposed breasts etc. It's all under Section 66 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003. Basically, for an offence to have taken place (for any gender) would need exposed genitals, deliberately intending someone else to see and with a reasonable suggestion of intent to cause harm/distress. I personally wouldn't want or expect to see a nude person answering the door, but in law, no offence is committed by simply standing there and accepting a delivery. The cases I've found where someone WAS prosecuted (male and female) involved nudity plus things like masturbation or deliberate wangling of body parts towards people in a manner to cause fear/distress. E.g. https://metro.co.uk/2022/08/15/northwich-woman-fined-200-for-masturbating-on-bench-outside-waitrose-17183485/ So what you are saying is: I can't put a fake moustache and googley eyes on my penis and thrust it through the letter box just as postie is about to deliver some letters? But I can answer the door bollock naked wearing a fake moustache and comedy glasses on my face as long as I'm not getting a sexual kink from it? Technically, by the letter of the law, yes. Someone attempting to prosecute the latter would need to demonstrate an intent to cause fear or distress. " That is correct. But I think what the author is really getting at is it REALLY worth all that hassle and likely considerable expense and possible harmed reputation even if not found guilty just for a quick thrill! Plus don't force your desires on someone who hasn't already given their consent. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's curious, because nudity alone is not illegal (either in public or on private property) and naturism is a non sexual lifestyle that many people have. The law on nudity is that you cannot expose your genitals such that you intend someone to see them and that you cannot be expose your genitals intending to cause harm or distress. There is no law banning nudity, no law about exposed breasts etc. It's all under Section 66 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003. Basically, for an offence to have taken place (for any gender) would need exposed genitals, deliberately intending someone else to see and with a reasonable suggestion of intent to cause harm/distress. I personally wouldn't want or expect to see a nude person answering the door, but in law, no offence is committed by simply standing there and accepting a delivery. The cases I've found where someone WAS prosecuted (male and female) involved nudity plus things like masturbation or deliberate wangling of body parts towards people in a manner to cause fear/distress. E.g. https://metro.co.uk/2022/08/15/northwich-woman-fined-200-for-masturbating-on-bench-outside-waitrose-17183485/ So what you are saying is: I can't put a fake moustache and googley eyes on my penis and thrust it through the letter box just as postie is about to deliver some letters? But I can answer the door bollock naked wearing a fake moustache and comedy glasses on my face as long as I'm not getting a sexual kink from it? Technically, by the letter of the law, yes. Someone attempting to prosecute the latter would need to demonstrate an intent to cause fear or distress. That is correct. But I think what the author is really getting at is it REALLY worth all that hassle and likely considerable expense and possible harmed reputation even if not found guilty just for a quick thrill! Plus don't force your desires on someone who hasn't already given their consent. " Please read the bit where I said that explaining what's technically legal isn't me giving my personal opinion. I'm not a naturist, I don't and won't be answering my door naked. However, leaving aside people trying to get some kind of sexual kick (which probably renders the nudity illegal), there are people who are naturists. Naturism isn't sexual, it's not a kink or fetish. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" But as we all have to live in an ordered society we sometimes have to think of more than just what we want and be considerate to others. And I wear clothes when answering the door! " Yes, I don’t think anything else needs to be said really | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Poor Maureen. She just got out of the bath" 😆 Oo has she? I’ll be right round | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Poor Maureen. She just got out of the bath 😆 Oo has she? I’ll be right round" She's just dusting herself off with Morny Lily of The Valley talc, bring chips | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |