FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Huw Edwards

Jump to newest
 

By *asycouple1971 OP   Couple
3 days ago

midlands

Suspended sentence and using mental health as a reason for downloading and storing the most vile child porn.

He is laughing as he knows he's got away with it.

Vile evil person.

Mr

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *landalfMan
3 days ago

Airdrie

Yip, that's horrific

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eordieJeansCouple
3 days ago

Newcastle upon Tyne


"Suspended sentence and using mental health as a reason for downloading and storing the most vile child porn.

He is laughing as he knows he's got away with it.

Vile evil person.

Mr"

He’d be in jail if he steamed a Premier League football match. The justice system is fucked.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arlot o scaraWoman
3 days ago

Hell

Vile

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *igTy30Man
3 days ago

West Yorkshire


"Suspended sentence and using mental health as a reason for downloading and storing the most vile child porn.

He is laughing as he knows he's got away with it.

Vile evil person.

Mr"

People like him deserve the most severe punishment. It’s absolutely disgusting, both the crime and the punishment.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uttercupWoman
3 days ago

Borders

What a horrific kick in the teeth for the victims & their families.

I've absolutely no faith in the system anymore. Disgusting!!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *os19Man
3 days ago

Edmonton

This is the problem with mental health it’s easy to use mental health as a excuse for poor standards of behaviour or to get what you want.Yes I appreciate people to have it but not everyone who claims to have it does just use it as a excuse to get what they want.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uke-de-PleasureMan
3 days ago

Leeds

He pleaded guilty to a first time offence. So par for the course.

But he had to keep his nose VERY clean for the next 7 years. I sincerely hope, like us all, its the last we ever see or hear of this vile waste of oxygen but I can't help but wonder it might not, and we may see him clogging the Courts and the media once more.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
3 days ago

in Lancashire


"This is the problem with mental health it’s easy to use mental health as a excuse for poor standards of behaviour or to get what you want.Yes I appreciate people to have it but not everyone who claims to have it does just use it as a excuse to get what they want."

Agreed..

There was communication for four years and hundreds of pounds paid by him to the other guy yet the only platform the prosecution could look at was WhatsApp..

That in itself is an issue..

He's gotten away with on the face of it further possible charges..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
3 days ago

Central

I think it was standard punishment. Hopefully enough to stop any further harm

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *m3232Man
3 days ago

maidenhead

The judges should be held accountable as he should have gone to prison.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *agatoXXXMan
3 days ago

North Haverbrook

Hopefully he'll face some rough justice on the outside.😡

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orthern BeardMan
3 days ago

Banbury

Absolutely mental this

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aveyBoyABCMan
3 days ago

Heage

These crimes for the last 10 years now haven't been punishable with custodial sentences that are served, they are always suspended sentences.

It's the slow creep to the viewing of images being legalised which will happen within the next 5 years.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nickeringWoman
3 days ago

Coleshill

yea how can they jail him when they emptying the prisons anyway ! the rioters got a bigger sentence!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aveyBoyABCMan
3 days ago

Heage


"yea how can they jail him when they emptying the prisons anyway ! the rioters got a bigger sentence! "

He wouldn't have got a custodial sentence anyway as the sentences have since 10 years ago always been suspended for this type of crime.

There was a manager where i used to work, he was found with thousands of images in the worst category in 2012. He only got a suspended sentence back then.

It a crime the CPS and Police want to legalise as they see it as consuming too may many hours.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nickeringWoman
3 days ago

Coleshill


"yea how can they jail him when they emptying the prisons anyway ! the rioters got a bigger sentence!

He wouldn't have got a custodial sentence anyway as the sentences have since 10 years ago always been suspended for this type of crime.

There was a manager where i used to work, he was found with thousands of images in the worst category in 2012. He only got a suspended sentence back then.

It a crime the CPS and Police want to legalise as they see it as consuming too may many hours."

yea thats true - they didnt say did they the category of images? but its first offence and he pleaded guilty

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icolerobbieCouple
3 days ago

walsall

Course he got away with it. He didn’t say anything nasty on social media. Woe betide him if he had.

If this is part of too dear kiers crackdown on crime, he should hand his head in shame.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *cnugatugMan
3 days ago

Chatham

Should be locked up with the rest of them and forgotten about. 6 months suspended sentence for 2 years and 7 years on the register is not justice.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eordie-nufcMan
3 days ago

Peterlee

Will he still get his BBC pension and other benefits from the BBC?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arlot o scaraWoman
3 days ago

Hell


"yea how can they jail him when they emptying the prisons anyway ! the rioters got a bigger sentence!

He wouldn't have got a custodial sentence anyway as the sentences have since 10 years ago always been suspended for this type of crime.

There was a manager where i used to work, he was found with thousands of images in the worst category in 2012. He only got a suspended sentence back then. "

I think it depends on the judge. My ex husband got almost 3 years for possession of indecent images. Needless to say, as soon as I found out I left.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orny PTMan
3 days ago

Peterborough


"Will he still get his BBC pension and other benefits from the BBC? "

He best not do, as he has brought his company's name into disrepute (along with the other motley crew).

His high paid job got him the high payed legal team, who grifted their way into keeping him out of the prison showers, picking up soap.

Disgusting. He'd probably get jail time for typing something non woke online.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orny PTMan
3 days ago

Peterborough

TYPO: paid not payed!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ornyabdnguyMan
3 days ago

inverurie

Should be jailed

Minimum 5/10 years

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orny PTMan
3 days ago

Peterborough


"Should be jailed

Minimum 5/10 years "

Per offence/picture?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *929Man
3 days ago

newcastle

Should be executed never mind locked up

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *amantha_JadeWoman
3 days ago

Newcastle

I don’t think I can post what I think should happen to him and all other paedophiles, as I’d probably end up getting my account suspended. The sentence is an absolute joke.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ools and the brainCouple
3 days ago

couple, us we him her.

As I said on the other thread I politics.

Send him to Belmarsh for a few years they'll sort him out proper

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tsMattyHMan
3 days ago

Inverurie

The BBC seems to have an awful lot of peados on the books

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *amantha_NiteTV/TS
3 days ago

The beautiful Lake District

High profiole person,was he spared jail for HIS protection

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ools and the brainCouple
3 days ago

couple, us we him her.


"High profiole person,was he spared jail for HIS protection "

Let's be honest as bad as it is that he's escaped justice, he's certainly not going to live a comfortable life again he's going to be looking over his shoulder for the rest of his life, which is far less than he deserves.

Let's hope he fucks up and breaks his conditions and ends up in jail.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *929Man
3 days ago

newcastle


"The BBC seems to have an awful lot of peados on the books"

They didn’t get the ‘pedo corporation’ name for nowt mate

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tsJustKateWoman
3 days ago

London


"yea how can they jail him when they emptying the prisons anyway ! the rioters got a bigger sentence!

He wouldn't have got a custodial sentence anyway as the sentences have since 10 years ago always been suspended for this type of crime.

There was a manager where i used to work, he was found with thousands of images in the worst category in 2012. He only got a suspended sentence back then.

It a crime the CPS and Police want to legalise as they see it as consuming too may many hours.

yea thats true - they didnt say did they the category of images? but its first offence and he pleaded guilty"

They said in the news "of the worst kind". He should give been jailed for at least 5 years,regardless of his 'supposed'mental health status.

This sends the wrong message to people who want to view or make indecent images. 6 months is a joke and a disgrace.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eordie-nufcMan
3 days ago

Peterlee


"yea how can they jail him when they emptying the prisons anyway ! the rioters got a bigger sentence!

He wouldn't have got a custodial sentence anyway as the sentences have since 10 years ago always been suspended for this type of crime.

There was a manager where i used to work, he was found with thousands of images in the worst category in 2012. He only got a suspended sentence back then.

It a crime the CPS and Police want to legalise as they see it as consuming too may many hours.

yea thats true - they didnt say did they the category of images? but its first offence and he pleaded guilty

They said in the news "of the worst kind". He should give been jailed for at least 5 years,regardless of his 'supposed'mental health status.

This sends the wrong message to people who want to view or make indecent images. 6 months is a joke and a disgrace. "

As the saying goes "the best money can buy"

He should get what anyone else would have got.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ark RumMan
3 days ago

Bucks

Beyond disgusting and sums up our 'justice' system.

And another from the BBC. Wonder how many more......

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouseofhoneyCouple
2 days ago

North West

Shows how corrupt and full of nonces the 'establishment' really is yet again...

And no I'm not a crazy conspiracy theorist, it's just time after time when it comes to this sort of stuff.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oan of DArcCouple
2 days ago

Glasgow


"

As the saying goes "the best money can buy"

He should get what anyone else would have got.

"

--------------------------

He did. The man who sold the images to him also received a suspended sentence.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *illxxMan
2 days ago

motherwell

One rule for the rich and one rule for the ordinary people if it was an ordinary guy of the street he would have been serving time by now

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *r John WickMan
2 days ago

The Continental


"One rule for the rich and one rule for the ordinary people if it was an ordinary guy of the street he would have been serving time by now "

The difference a phalanx of £5000 an hour lawyers makes to your sentence.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mf123Man
2 days ago

with one foot out the door

The law in this country/the world has been corrupt for centuries why the surprise there are 2 kinds of people those with power and those without voldemort was right about that there is no right or wrong only power

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *landalfMan
2 days ago

Airdrie

The sad thing is that the sentence he received is common in English law for that that type of offence. So regardless of his fame, and mental health excuses, his sentence is similar to what someone who isn't famous would get.

Not standing up for him in anyway, there just needs to be a massive overhaul of the punishments so that they fit the crime. And if they built a couple of extra prisons, there'd be less need for suspended sentences

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nightsoftheCoffeeTableCouple
2 days ago

Leeds

It was always going to be this outcome given the person who sent him the pics also got this sentence - I don't agree with it, but as a "celeb" everyone knows him and everyone knows he's a nonce, it's not like he can just hide away and no one will ever know, I'm sure his life will become pretty shit and so it should.

Mrs

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ustme34Man
2 days ago

Bradford


"Suspended sentence and using mental health as a reason for downloading and storing the most vile child porn.

He is laughing as he knows he's got away with it.

Vile evil person.

Mr"

a sentence like that is only going to give other predators an excuse from here forward . Scary times ahead if more people get away with this stuf

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *midnight-Woman
2 days ago

...


"The sad thing is that the sentence he received is common in English law for that that type of offence. So regardless of his fame, and mental health excuses, his sentence is similar to what someone who isn't famous would get.

Not standing up for him in anyway, there just needs to be a massive overhaul of the punishments so that they fit the crime. And if they built a couple of extra prisons, there'd be less need for suspended sentences "

Yes this... Peaceful protesters have had longer sentences.

UK definitely needs an overhaul. I have no idea how easy /hard this is in reality - does it open the doors for everyone who has been previously jailed?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *ornyabdnguyMan
2 days ago

inverurie


"Should be jailed

Minimum 5/10 years

Per offence/picture?"

I was meaning in general but hey I’m ok with per picture too

I won’t say my views on folk like him or I’ll get banned

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top