FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Georgia Harrison v Bear

Jump to newest
 

By *parkle1974 OP   Woman
43 weeks ago

Leeds

Just watched the documentary where she took him to court for putting a video of them having sex in the garden without her consent online...

He got 21 months and put on the sex offenders register!

Makes me wonder how many have other people's consent has been given when you see pics of others on single profiles!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lowupdollTV/TS
43 weeks ago

Herts/Beds/London

The folks on here posting pics including others without real consent are playing a dangerous game of self delusion. Maybe this will wake them up to the fact that the pics of their hand and sone woman who doesn’t know her pics are on here might just have the most awful consequences they can imagine.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *batMan
43 weeks ago

Alicante, Spain. (Sometimes in Wales)

What about when you see three or more people on a couples profile? Just as many trust/consent issues there, surely?

Gbat

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
43 weeks ago

There must have been Something for them to have had sex in the garden. Maybe they thought Here Comes the Sun?

My Sweet Lord, he ended up in jail? It’s enough to make your guitar gently weep.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ebauchedDeviantsPt2Couple
43 weeks ago

Cumbria


"Just watched the documentary where she took him to court for putting a video of them having sex in the garden without her consent online...

He got 21 months and put on the sex offenders register!

Makes me wonder how many have other people's consent has been given when you see pics of others on single profiles!! "

I think there would be a few on here who’d be in trouble.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lowupdollTV/TS
43 weeks ago

Herts/Beds/London


"Just watched the documentary where she took him to court for putting a video of them having sex in the garden without her consent online...

He got 21 months and put on the sex offenders register!

Makes me wonder how many have other people's consent has been given when you see pics of others on single profiles!!

I think there would be a few on here who’d be in trouble."

More than a few.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *bi HaiveMan
Forum Mod
43 weeks ago

Cheeseville, Somerset

I'm not a huge fan of photos where there's any potential to identify a third party, or those where there's more of someone else in a shot than the profile owner/owners.

As long as there's consent all is good, but it's the possibility of the other parry not knowing that makes me uneasy. I've seen many photos over the years where the other party has been named (profile name obvs) in the image, which if there's a corresponding veri puts my mind at rest a little. Maybe that would be a means of proving consent, by requiring a tag on an image?

In the case of Bear I think the sentence was what it was due to him monetising the content and the fact she was identifiable. He deserved exactly what he got, if not longer in my mind.

But yep. It should be a wake up call to those that think publishing graphic images of partners or exes without their knowledge is acceptable. The volume of threads and posts from 'single' male profiles on here offering wife swap pics makes me shudder.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *cLovin2Man
43 weeks ago

Reading

Have to agree with Obi, there's a type of toxic man who thinks he has the right to inflict pain on women and others. Bear probably deserved more as he showed little remorse and dressed up for the papers hiring a limo and arriving at court in it. What a complete tosser

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *zeroMan
43 weeks ago

Glasgow

The one bear that women would never choose.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uckurcumMan
43 weeks ago

Bishop Auckland

Wonder how many wives..female partners know they are being used as virtual click bate for their male partners,pals whatever to get to have a wank with another guy ...when of course they are definitely straight...

Some may well have consent to share ..others very likely not !

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oodmessMan
43 weeks ago

yumsville

The majority of my meets were women and couples and it was a near regular event for a cameras to get whipped out - and that was a fair long time ago... The number of superman poses you'd have to do () You do see a lot on mens profiles but it's seemed a near normal thing for people to record shit or take pics without asking.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *issmorganWoman
43 weeks ago

Calderdale innit


"I'm not a huge fan of photos where there's any potential to identify a third party, or those where there's more of someone else in a shot than the profile owner/owners.

As long as there's consent all is good, but it's the possibility of the other parry not knowing that makes me uneasy. I've seen many photos over the years where the other party has been named (profile name obvs) in the image, which if there's a corresponding veri puts my mind at rest a little. Maybe that would be a means of proving consent, by requiring a tag on an image?

In the case of Bear I think the sentence was what it was due to him monetising the content and the fact she was identifiable. He deserved exactly what he got, if not longer in my mind.

But yep. It should be a wake up call to those that think publishing graphic images of partners or exes without their knowledge is acceptable. The volume of threads and posts from 'single' male profiles on here offering wife swap pics makes me shudder. "

Spot on, I cringe at all the posts offering to swap wife pics or try and get someone to come on to her when she's out and about, without her having any knowledge of her partner being here.

Actions do have consequences and people forget that.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top