Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As with all naming conventions likely nuanced. But I'd say a fwb is someone I'd happily got to the pub with, but has that invitation within the friendship for filth, while an FB is someone who we predominantly and largely exclusively fuck when we spend time together (pizza breaks allowed)" This, the friends part makes it more of a relationship but not exclusively than casual hook ups. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"OK good feedback. So a fuck buddy is someone you only interact with when engaging in sex? A friend with benefits is like having a romantic partner in everything but name?" Personally... a fwb isn't a romantic partner, it's a friend where intimacy is part of our friendship. I can indeed have a lot of love for them, but I'm not planning my future with a presumption of them in it, or aiming towards running of into the sunset and all the relationship expectations that may come with that. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bookmarking this for the plethora of convoluted responses that will leave me none-the-wiser." Learning from another's perspective will always make us wiser. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is more common for women to see men as fuck buddies or vice versa? Personally I need to feel safe with a person before I can have sex with someone but I suppose it is possible to build that with either dynamic. " Needing connection for intimacy is very very ok, I think a lot of us roll that way. Sex is exposing, and vulnerable and our bodies are ours to both protect and give... and everyone's lines on this are different. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I never thought there was much of a difference. As a preference I prefer married/attached fwb’s as that helps keep boundaries firm and they’re less likely to stray into other feelings beyond friendship with sex" So there may be another pattern emerging. Where single people lean more to other singles and married people prefer other married or attached people? This is very interesting. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bookmarking this for the plethora of convoluted responses that will leave me none-the-wiser." I actually thought it was fairly straight forward? An FB is someone you meet up primarily for sex, whilst a FWB has the sexual as well as emphasis on a social component? With the FB you do the deed and off you go while the FWB might be someone you spend the weekend together, see a film or attend theatre with, go out for dinner, etc? Unless I've completely missed something | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is more common for women to see men as fuck buddies or vice versa? Personally I need to feel safe with a person before I can have sex with someone but I suppose it is possible to build that with either dynamic. Needing connection for intimacy is very very ok, I think a lot of us roll that way. Sex is exposing, and vulnerable and our bodies are ours to both protect and give... and everyone's lines on this are different." Plus trauma, always a fun barrier to overcome. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is more common for women to see men as fuck buddies or vice versa? Personally I need to feel safe with a person before I can have sex with someone but I suppose it is possible to build that with either dynamic. Needing connection for intimacy is very very ok, I think a lot of us roll that way. Sex is exposing, and vulnerable and our bodies are ours to both protect and give... and everyone's lines on this are different. Plus trauma, always a fun barrier to overcome. " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bookmarking this for the plethora of convoluted responses that will leave me none-the-wiser. I actually thought it was fairly straight forward? An FB is someone you meet up primarily for sex, whilst a FWB has the sexual as well as emphasis on a social component? With the FB you do the deed and off you go while the FWB might be someone you spend the weekend together, see a film or attend theatre with, go out for dinner, etc? Unless I've completely missed something " That was my initial understanding too but it was the "must be single " part in some preference I was trying to understand. I have friends I don't sleep with and I don't require any of them be single. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bookmarking this for the plethora of convoluted responses that will leave me none-the-wiser. I actually thought it was fairly straight forward? An FB is someone you meet up primarily for sex, whilst a FWB has the sexual as well as emphasis on a social component? With the FB you do the deed and off you go while the FWB might be someone you spend the weekend together, see a film or attend theatre with, go out for dinner, etc? Unless I've completely missed something That was my initial understanding too but it was the "must be single " part in some preference I was trying to understand. I have friends I don't sleep with and I don't require any of them be single. " I think maybe it's because single doesn't mean they can't sleep with other people even have other friends with benefits. I just don't want to be part of you cheating on your unsuspecting partner. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" What is the difference between a fuck buddy and a friends with benefits situation and a sub question, why do most FWB preference the other be single. If both people are single and exclusively sleeping and socialising with each other, is that not just a relationship? I am trying to understand the nuance. " Why do you think fwb means people are exclusive to each other? If fb's see each other when they do and fwb see each other but do other things too, what says they don't see others also? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Single or attached with partners consent only though. " Of course. Consent is the difference between poly and cheating. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bookmarking this for the plethora of convoluted responses that will leave me none-the-wiser. I actually thought it was fairly straight forward? An FB is someone you meet up primarily for sex, whilst a FWB has the sexual as well as emphasis on a social component? With the FB you do the deed and off you go while the FWB might be someone you spend the weekend together, see a film or attend theatre with, go out for dinner, etc? Unless I've completely missed something That was my initial understanding too but it was the "must be single " part in some preference I was trying to understand. I have friends I don't sleep with and I don't require any of them be single. " Ah I see... I don't require an fwb to be single as long as the partner knows what's going on and is ok with it too. Can't speak for others. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I never thought there was much of a difference. As a preference I prefer married/attached fwb’s as that helps keep boundaries firm and they’re less likely to stray into other feelings beyond friendship with sex So there may be another pattern emerging. Where single people lean more to other singles and married people prefer other married or attached people? This is very interesting. " Maybe? And it’s a preference for me but it’s not set in stone. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I never thought there was much of a difference. As a preference I prefer married/attached fwb’s as that helps keep boundaries firm and they’re less likely to stray into other feelings beyond friendship with sex So there may be another pattern emerging. Where single people lean more to other singles and married people prefer other married or attached people? This is very interesting. " I think two singles as FWB probably have more opportunity for unplanned, instant stuff. If a FWB is part of a couple it makes planning a little more important. That would certainly be my interpretation of the situation. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Why do you think fwb means people are exclusive to each other?" I didn't think that necessarily. I was asking for clarification on the trend of people looking for FWB that are unattached? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bookmarking this for the plethora of convoluted responses that will leave me none-the-wiser. I actually thought it was fairly straight forward? An FB is someone you meet up primarily for sex, whilst a FWB has the sexual as well as emphasis on a social component? With the FB you do the deed and off you go while the FWB might be someone you spend the weekend together, see a film or attend theatre with, go out for dinner, etc? Unless I've completely missed something That was my initial understanding too but it was the "must be single " part in some preference I was trying to understand. I have friends I don't sleep with and I don't require any of them be single. " It's probably people trying to avoid drama. People who are married, cheating, playing away.. people in relationships that are consensual but only have a couple of hours rather than a full day or couple of days. You've probably read a profile or two and seen a preference.. Singles are usually less hassle to work with I'd imagine. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bookmarking this for the plethora of convoluted responses that will leave me none-the-wiser. I actually thought it was fairly straight forward? An FB is someone you meet up primarily for sex, whilst a FWB has the sexual as well as emphasis on a social component? With the FB you do the deed and off you go while the FWB might be someone you spend the weekend together, see a film or attend theatre with, go out for dinner, etc? Unless I've completely missed something That was my initial understanding too but it was the "must be single " part in some preference I was trying to understand. I have friends I don't sleep with and I don't require any of them be single. It's probably people trying to avoid drama. People who are married, cheating, playing away.. people in relationships that are consensual but only have a couple of hours rather than a full day or couple of days. You've probably read a profile or two and seen a preference.. Singles are usually less hassle to work with I'd imagine." Valid observation. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Philosophy 101... FB (fuck buddy) - " hey...what you up to? Fancy a fuck?" FWB (friend with benefits) - " _ello, what you doing over the weekend? Fancy going to see the new Deadpool movie, grab a drink and than maybe later some naked cuddles at my place ? " " Yes I do, I love the Deadpool films | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Fascinating discussion! There hasn’t been any mention of either FB or FWB where a single guy (or woman) interacts with a couple. Doesn’t need to be a bi setting (not for us certainly but each to their own). It seems to have been assumed that only 2 people can be involved :-0 Then thank you for joining the conversation and adding your perspective to the chat. " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bookmarking this for the plethora of convoluted responses that will leave me none-the-wiser. · I actually thought it was fairly straight forward? An FB is someone you meet up primarily for sex, whilst a FWB has the sexual as well as emphasis on a social component? With the FB you do the deed and off you go while the FWB might be someone you spend the weekend together, see a film or attend theatre with, go out for dinner, etc? Unless I've completely missed something " • The question was straightforward (and a good one). Every response has its merit and there's no wrong answer (sort of). But every answer is prone to misinterpretation (by me) because there is no officially mandated definition. And...I was actually being jocular. . | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Fascinating discussion! There hasn’t been any mention of either FB or FWB where a single guy (or woman) interacts with a couple. Doesn’t need to be a bi setting (not for us certainly but each to their own). It seems to have been assumed that only 2 people can be involved :-0 " I have a nice FWB situation with a couple going on nearly a year now. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"… I actually thought it was fairly straight forward? An FB is someone you meet up primarily for sex, whilst a FWB has the sexual as well as emphasis on a social component? With the FB you do the deed and off you go while the FWB might be someone you spend the weekend together, see a film or attend theatre with, go out for dinner, etc? Unless I've completely missed something • The question was straightforward (and a good one). Every response has its merit and there's no wrong answer …" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't do fbs and I don't do fwbs. I wouldn't class any of the guys I talk to..." • You talk to guys?!? , JÅG? Well, that's my bubble burst. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I thought the clue was in the title? But imo: Fuck buddy= regular person to fuck (just contact to arrange meets) FRIEND with benefits = friend who you do normal matey things with & also have sex with Relationship = romantic stuff, emotional investment, being in love, building a life together jointly. " So a fundamental difference seems to be how one is regarded in the moments without sex? A fuck buddy is of little value without sex but a fwb is someone you would be friends with regardless of the physical contact? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't do fbs and I don't do fwbs. I wouldn't class any of the guys I talk to... • You talk to guys?!? , JÅG? Well, that's my bubble burst." Only the funny ones | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I have longterm friends with benefits, we share all aspects of life together, bar merging family, finances and homes. Roaming on weekend adventures is fuck buddy time, quick "are you available" text and rumpy pumpy is arranged. I don't chat regularly to those guys and we certainly don't share life together." Rumpy pumpy | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Tjat's pretty much it. A FWB is primarily a friend that U enjoy hanging out together and just shag, once in a while. " Sort NSD, no-strings dating... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"FB - minimal contact, don't really engage in any ac_ivities other than sex FWB - some or a lot of contact whether it's texting/calling, hanging out maybe get a drink or do an ac_ivity, can actually talk to them about stuff as opposed to FB Imo FWB is worse cos someone always ends up catching feelings at least with FB's it's just purely sex " I like catching feels. I Don't need it reciprocated. Plenty of time in my youth I had feels for someone who didn't. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What is one to another is something else to someone else. Fuck buddy to me is someone I see for sex, I might have a cup of coffee with them but that’s it, then straight to it. I’d rarely speak to them in between meets, other than to arrange the next. FWB to me is someone I would do things with… go to dinner or ac_ivities (non sexual), have no issue messaging or calling to have a chat. Very much like a friend but one that I have lots of sex with Neither mean being exclusive for me." This. I’ve had both. I prefer FWB. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hi guys, I need the cultural braintrust of fab for a moment. May I also state that I am asking in ernest and not to be prejudice. What is the difference between a fuck buddy and a friends with benefits situation and a sub question, why do most FWB preference the other be single. If both people are single and exclusively sleeping and socialising with each other, is that not just a relationship? I am trying to understand the nuance. " In all my years I've never had a FB or FWB where there's been any exclusivity. FB's are pretty much just two people meeting for sex. FWB's socialise and may go out together on 'dates' too. Neither are committed relationships, regardless of how close you are. The F's matter. 'Fuck' and 'Friend'. Therein lies the difference. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hi guys, I need the cultural braintrust of fab for a moment. May I also state that I am asking in ernest and not to be prejudice. What is the difference between a fuck buddy and a friends with benefits situation and a sub question, why do most FWB preference the other be single. If both people are single and exclusively sleeping and socialising with each other, is that not just a relationship? I am trying to understand the nuance. In all my years I've never had a FB or FWB where there's been any exclusivity. FB's are pretty much just two people meeting for sex. FWB's socialise and may go out together on 'dates' too. Neither are committed relationships, regardless of how close you are. The F's matter. 'Fuck' and 'Friend'. Therein lies the difference. " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |