FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Jim Davidson Banned

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Jim Davidson has been banned from performing at the Marlowe Theatre in Canterbury

Good

Well done Mark Everett Theatre Director for your comments on BBC News

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Why?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icked weaselCouple
over a year ago

Near Edinburgh..

[Removed by poster at 05/04/13 02:10:50]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"[Removed by poster at 05/04/13 02:10:50]"

I read that the director said 'he isn't to everyones taste so we don't want him'. So, wouldn't the people that WANTED to watch him go, and those that DIDN'T, not go? Lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"[Removed by poster at 05/04/13 02:10:50]

I read that the director said 'he isn't to everyones taste so we don't want him'. So, wouldn't the people that WANTED to watch him go, and those that DIDN'T, not go? Lol"

It sounds more like a director using the media to promote his tiny little club that nobody's ever heard of at the expense of someone who probably doesn't give a flying fuck about whether he plays there or not. It's not like Jim Davidson needs this extra gig, he always fills his gigs wherever he plays and I for one would love to go and see him.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"[Removed by poster at 05/04/13 02:10:50]

I read that the director said 'he isn't to everyones taste so we don't want him'. So, wouldn't the people that WANTED to watch him go, and those that DIDN'T, not go? Lol"

Yeah, what he said.

No-one was being forced to go see him.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Jim ought to have an open air gig outside the theatre now just to piss the manager off.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ranny-CrumpetWoman
over a year ago

The Town by The Cross


"[Removed by poster at 05/04/13 02:10:50]

I read that the director said 'he isn't to everyones taste so we don't want him'. So, wouldn't the people that WANTED to watch him go, and those that DIDN'T, not go? Lol

It sounds more like a director using the media to promote his tiny little club that nobody's ever heard of at the expense of someone who probably doesn't give a flying fuck about whether he plays there or not. It's not like Jim Davidson needs this extra gig, he always fills his gigs wherever he plays and I for one would love to go and see him."

He plays very small venues. Just how many seats he sells I've no idea. Don't think you'd have trouble getting a seat though.

He does midweek slots and the occassional weekend.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

East Sussex

Censorship by one person is a bad thing, what gives one person the right to make such a decision? I'm no Jim Davidson fan the man repulses me but I respect other peoples right to see him

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Censorship by one person is a bad thing, what gives one person the right to make such a decision? I'm no Jim Davidson fan the man repulses me but I respect other peoples right to see him"

He's one of those guys whose commercial stuff I loathe, but he does good work for the military and charities so I've got mixed feelings. Personally I'd never go watch him as I don't think he's remotely amusing however banning him isn't necessarily a good thing.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

East Sussex

banning people only gives them publicity usually. We wouldn't be talking about him this morning if he hadn't been barred from The Marlowe.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

But he has been so we are

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Perhaps it's to do with being arrested by the operation yewtree plods.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *B9 QueenWoman
over a year ago

Over the rainbow, under the bridge

Can't stand the little scrote and don't care whether he's banned or not. That is the prerogative of the manager of the theatre. They can book who they like, or not, as the case may be.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ust_for_laughsCouple
over a year ago

Hinckley

Same here, can't stand the bigoted, Tory twat...but I don't believe in censorship either.

Let people hear how outlandish your ideas are and then they can make up their own minds.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *B9 QueenWoman
over a year ago

Over the rainbow, under the bridge


"Same here, can't stand the bigoted, Tory twat...but I don't believe in censorship either.

Let people hear how outlandish your ideas are and then they can make up their own minds.

"

And if the venue doesn't think he will pull the crowds in? He's not as popular as he once was. They could end up making a loss.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ust_for_laughsCouple
over a year ago

Hinckley


"Same here, can't stand the bigoted, Tory twat...but I don't believe in censorship either.

Let people hear how outlandish your ideas are and then they can make up their own minds.

And if the venue doesn't think he will pull the crowds in? He's not as popular as he once was. They could end up making a loss."

That's a different matter entirely, my issue was just with censorship. I wouldn't book him but he'd be quite welcome to stand outside and protest at me not booking him

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I don't see why they had to make an issue of it. if they don't want him in their theatre,fine.

why broadcast it?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

East Sussex


"I don't see why they had to make an issue of it. if they don't want him in their theatre,fine.

why broadcast it?"

Exactly!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

To promote the theatre of course .. Jim regularly plays gigs in Glasgow and are always sell outs ..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Nothing wrong with Jim.

Roy chubby brown is WAY worse, never see much about him..

Sounds like the guy needs butts in the seats. Thats about all ; )

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I thought he lived in the UAE these days ?

Didn't realise he was still performing.

I remember being on the next table to him in a restaurant and let's just say he didn't fail to live up to the preconceptions I had about him.

Brash, vulgar and completely full of himself.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *B9 QueenWoman
over a year ago

Over the rainbow, under the bridge

Cannot stand him. His jokes include ones about cancer sufferers, rape victims, wheelchair users, homosexuals, not to mention the ubiquitous racist jokes. He even refused to go on stage once because there were wheelchair users in the front row - he wanted them to be moved. He became a tax exile to Dubai but came back in 2010. He also was a 'character witness' for a vile criminal who was up on drug charges and who was subsequently given 30 years - so moves in some really nice circles. He is an alcoholic and serial wife abuser. And has been declared bankrupt. Yeah, nice guy.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ust_for_laughsCouple
over a year ago

Hinckley


"Nothing wrong with Jim.

Roy chubby brown is WAY worse, never see much about him..

Sounds like the guy needs butts in the seats. Thats about all ; )"

Chubby Brown is completely different to Davidson...can't stand either of them but one of them has an act and the other one really is a bigoted fool. I'll leave you to decide which one is which...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It's a 1200 seat venue. The decision is a commercial one no doubt. If they don't feel he'll sell the tickets because of the recent adverse media coverage he has attracted, then cancelling his performance is in theatre's best interests.

Most performance spaces like this one also have a cultural policy, so maybe they feel someone like him doesn't fit their remit. Having said that, from the events still in their calendar, they have some shite coming up! So he would've fitted right in.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *B9 QueenWoman
over a year ago

Over the rainbow, under the bridge


"It's a 1200 seat venue. The decision is a commercial one no doubt. If they don't feel he'll sell the tickets because of the recent adverse media coverage he has attracted, then cancelling his performance is in theatre's best interests.

Most performance spaces like this one also have a cultural policy, so maybe they feel someone like him doesn't fit their remit. Having said that, from the events still in their calendar, they have some shite coming up! So he would've fitted right in. "

A lot of his work is pubs and clubs now anyway. Personally, I would pay him to stay away!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It's a 1200 seat venue. The decision is a commercial one no doubt. If they don't feel he'll sell the tickets because of the recent adverse media coverage he has attracted, then cancelling his performance is in theatre's best interests.

Most performance spaces like this one also have a cultural policy, so maybe they feel someone like him doesn't fit their remit. Having said that, from the events still in their calendar, they have some shite coming up! So he would've fitted right in.

A lot of his work is pubs and clubs now anyway. Personally, I would pay him to stay away!"

He was a guest in the hotel where I worked twenty years ago whilst starring at the Hippodrome in Bristol. Appalling man from what I saw - and I saw a fair bit!

More recently, he was appearing on the pier here is Weston. A few hundred went, but I think he's had it. I'm gutted.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Why did they book him in the first place?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *B9 QueenWoman
over a year ago

Over the rainbow, under the bridge


"Why did they book him in the first place?"

They didn't. They refused to book him. The ticket sales of his first play 'Stand Up and Be Counted' were so disappointing that the entire tour was cancelled - that was in 2011. Since the abuse allegations I doubt many venues would want to book him.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *abioMan
over a year ago

Newcastle and Gateshead


"Perhaps it's to do with being arrested by the operation yewtree plods.

"

it probably is this to be honest.....

same reason why magic for example won't have DLT on the radio at the moment...

we all know "innocent till proven ect ect" but it must be pretty toxic at the moment booking anyone linked with this.....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

East Sussex


"But he has been so we are "

which is kind of my point really

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *issHottieBottieWoman
over a year ago

Kent

I live near the Marlowe and it doesn't need to promote itself, there's a lot of plays/gigs etc there and it's always very very busy.

I would imagine it is because of the allegations but like someone said just say no and that's it. No need to make it a big deal. Although was it the theatre who did that or his PR people?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

East Sussex


"I live near the Marlowe and it doesn't need to promote itself, there's a lot of plays/gigs etc there and it's always very very busy.

I would imagine it is because of the allegations but like someone said just say no and that's it. No need to make it a big deal. Although was it the theatre who did that or his PR people? "

I agree The Marlowe doesn't need publicity and you're probably right about the PR people, I hadn't thought of that

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *issHottieBottieWoman
over a year ago

Kent


"I live near the Marlowe and it doesn't need to promote itself, there's a lot of plays/gigs etc there and it's always very very busy.

I would imagine it is because of the allegations but like someone said just say no and that's it. No need to make it a big deal. Although was it the theatre who did that or his PR people?

I agree The Marlowe doesn't need publicity and you're probably right about the PR people, I hadn't thought of that "

From what I've just looked at on the Internet he was having a rant about it on twitter, wonder if the coverage started there?? X

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I always preferred the more innocuous run of the mill comedians like Bernard Manning myself, sounds like much ado about nothing but still, dont like the idea of someone deciding who I can or cannot watch or listen to.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ezebelWoman
over a year ago

North of The Wall - youll need your vest

Wasnt me, must have been Ruggers

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *Ryan-Man
over a year ago

In Your Bush


"Wasnt me, must have been Ruggers "

He's just ranting on his status

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *amschwingerzCouple
over a year ago

West

[Removed by poster at 05/04/13 14:01:16]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *B9 QueenWoman
over a year ago

Over the rainbow, under the bridge

He was banned from returning to one venue - can't remember which one - because he was so rude to the staff.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *amschwingerzCouple
over a year ago

West


"Nothing wrong with Jim.

Roy chubby brown is WAY worse, never see much about him..

Sounds like the guy needs butts in the seats. Thats about all ; )"

Yep...actually I dont like either..but I see your point...and it makes me laugh when people turn their noses up at certain 'common' comedians..yet think the likes of Ben Elton, Jimmy Carr, Frank Boyle et al are acceptable because they are a little bit more 'right on'...

When the content of their acts are far more smuttier..or plain offensive.

Bernard Manning does a joke about blacks or Pakistanis in a working mens club up north...and its all ...naughty racist man..some public school toff gets up and does one of their normal sneery 'observational comedy' routines in the Comedy Club about supposedly 'smelly' french' 'fat' Americans 'thick' Irish 'Boring' Germans and its all fnarr fnarr fnarr...

Racist humour is racist humour however its dressed up...it should be the style of 'humour' people have the issue with not the person delivering it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *amschwingerzCouple
over a year ago

West


"He was banned from returning to one venue - can't remember which one - because he was so rude to the staff."

I can believe that as it happens..a lot of comedians are very dour miserable/rude men off stage..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

O o O oo


"Wasnt me, must have been Ruggers "

Not me either....what was it I was meant to have done anyway?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

O o O oo


"Wasnt me, must have been Ruggers "

haha I have just realised what you meant...sorry I was a bit slow then

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *UNCHBOXMan
over a year ago

folkestone


"[Removed by poster at 05/04/13 02:10:50]

I read that the director said 'he isn't to everyones taste so we don't want him'. So, wouldn't the people that WANTED to watch him go, and those that DIDN'T, not go? Lol

It sounds more like a director using the media to promote his tiny little club that nobody's ever heard of at the expense of someone who probably doesn't give a flying fuck about whether he plays there or not. It's not like Jim Davidson needs this extra gig, he always fills his gigs wherever he plays and I for one would love to go and see him."

It's hardly a tiny little club if it has a capacity of 1200 is it?. Try doing some research first, instead of talking bollocks.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

We went to see him at WSM a while ago and spent the whole show telling some sad ass story about him and a couple mates being d*unk in Torquay and have heard funnier things from people sat in a doctors surgery tbh

Then after the show he was being very rude to an OAP who only asked for an autograph with him replying "bought a dvd ?" No was the old gents answer as he only just had enough money to get into the gig "then f*ck off people pay for my autograph"

My husband went mental at him towards the old guy then started having a go at hubby until he told him that he was ex forces and one of the squaddies who booed him off stage in Germany for being a twat.

Later he was having a go at the hotel staff for not keeping the bar open until he arrived for him and his mate to have a late drink then the morning came as we were signing out he was ranting at the staff again and didnt pay his bill (for the second time apparently at the same hotel) but when he saw us walking towards him he slunk off with his tail between his legs.

Tha man is truly awful on and off stage 20 years ago he may have been quite good but now he is just another washed up out of date comedian with tired jokes and boring personality xx

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *o-jCouple
over a year ago

Outskirts of Notts

I applaud the man for banning him , if only there more people like him back in the 70's the Sex Pistol would never have gigged anywhere and we wouldn't have all the kids turning into whatever it was they were susposed to have turned into ......

One man censorship is the only way way we're going to keep freedom of speach .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"[Removed by poster at 05/04/13 02:10:50]

I read that the director said 'he isn't to everyones taste so we don't want him'. So, wouldn't the people that WANTED to watch him go, and those that DIDN'T, not go? Lol

It sounds more like a director using the media to promote his tiny little club that nobody's ever heard of at the expense of someone who probably doesn't give a flying fuck about whether he plays there or not. It's not like Jim Davidson needs this extra gig, he always fills his gigs wherever he plays and I for one would love to go and see him."

i watched him at ceasars palace {luton} back in the 80s he was brilliant, met him back stage for photos etc and he was a real nice friendly guy

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *plankyMan
over a year ago

Beeston

He hasn't been banned, he hasn't been censored. He just hasn't been selected for a gig in Canterbury.

Maybe he'll get a job at some other venue if it seems the commercial arrangements are favourable.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"[Removed by poster at 05/04/13 02:10:50]

I read that the director said 'he isn't to everyones taste so we don't want him'. So, wouldn't the people that WANTED to watch him go, and those that DIDN'T, not go? Lol"

Got to agree.

Its like Roy Chubby Brown. if you do not like him stay away. Simples

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

East Sussex


"He hasn't been banned, he hasn't been censored. He just hasn't been selected for a gig in Canterbury.

Maybe he'll get a job at some other venue if it seems the commercial arrangements are favourable."

But why mention it?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Sad really as they guy does a lot of gigs for our troops serving in Afghanistan etc

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Sad really as they guy does a lot of gigs for our troops serving in Afghanistan etc "

I know its terrible isn't it, as if soldiers don't have a tough enough job as it is, then having to listen to that idiot attempt to entertain them.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *B9 QueenWoman
over a year ago

Over the rainbow, under the bridge

Vile man. Shame he still makes headlines for any reason.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"[Removed by poster at 05/04/13 02:10:50]

I read that the director said 'he isn't to everyones taste so we don't want him'. So, wouldn't the people that WANTED to watch him go, and those that DIDN'T, not go? Lol

It sounds more like a director using the media to promote his tiny little club that nobody's ever heard of at the expense of someone who probably doesn't give a flying fuck about whether he plays there or not. It's not like Jim Davidson needs this extra gig, he always fills his gigs wherever he plays and I for one would love to go and see him.

It's hardly a tiny little club if it has a capacity of 1200 is it?. Try doing some research first, instead of talking bollocks. "

Why on earth would I want to spend seconds of my valuable time researching some unknown club whose manager wanted to get it in the headlines. Any advertising is good advertising etc, and on that basis he's done Davidson a favour hasn't he. We're all talking about him.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Vile man. Shame he still makes headlines for any reason."

Well, quite.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"[Removed by poster at 05/04/13 02:10:50]

I read that the director said 'he isn't to everyones taste so we don't want him'. So, wouldn't the people that WANTED to watch him go, and those that DIDN'T, not go? Lol

It sounds more like a director using the media to promote his tiny little club that nobody's ever heard of at the expense of someone who probably doesn't give a flying fuck about whether he plays there or not. It's not like Jim Davidson needs this extra gig, he always fills his gigs wherever he plays and I for one would love to go and see him.

It's hardly a tiny little club if it has a capacity of 1200 is it?. Try doing some research first, instead of talking bollocks.

Why on earth would I want to spend seconds of my valuable time researching some unknown club whose manager wanted to get it in the headlines. Any advertising is good advertising etc, and on that basis he's done Davidson a favour hasn't he. We're all talking about him."

Because without doing the scantest research, it might make you sound like a complete and utter knob. Just a thought. There's nothing in this response that is saying you are of course.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Jim Davidson is a moderately famous comedian who is past his zenith and is skiing ever faster downhill as the days go by, a moderately interesting subject on a small 'specialist' forum. Why peeps need to get nasty with each other with barbed comments and some semi personal remarks is beyond me, whats the point of being like that?

Everybodys comments are equal and there is no need at all to get nasty over things.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Sad really as they guy does a lot of gigs for our troops serving in Afghanistan etc

I know its terrible isn't it, as if soldiers don't have a tough enough job as it is, then having to listen to that idiot attempt to entertain them. "

He came over to Hong Kong years ago and did a show for the troops at Stanley fort. My husband went and from him and I would estimate 90% of the troops I spoke to afterwards said they all enjoyed the show and even more so when he took time out after to chat to lots of them.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The Marlowe Theatre id s legit theatre owned by Canterbury City Council. Presumably they have guidelines like all other council regarding sexism/racism etc. Rightly or wrongly it's their call what they have on in their theatre. It was a decision taken by the Theatre management and the council.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *issHottieBottieWoman
over a year ago

Kent

From what I can make out from a google search it wasn't the theatre that made a big deal of it, it was him tweeting about it and its blown up from there. The guy who runs the Marlowe said that he didn't doubt that he would sell tickets but that jim isn't the sort of act that the theatre represents. Don't know what all the fuss it about to be honest. He got a gig in margate which is just up the road so anyone who thinks they're missing out can just go their.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *issHottieBottieWoman
over a year ago

Kent

There!!! Not their x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *B9 QueenWoman
over a year ago

Over the rainbow, under the bridge


"From what I can make out from a google search it wasn't the theatre that made a big deal of it, it was him tweeting about it and its blown up from there. The guy who runs the Marlowe said that he didn't doubt that he would sell tickets but that jim isn't the sort of act that the theatre represents. Don't know what all the fuss it about to be honest. He got a gig in margate which is just up the road so anyone who thinks they're missing out can just go their. "

He will do anything for publicity! Like most has-beens.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *UNCHBOXMan
over a year ago

folkestone


"[Removed by poster at 05/04/13 02:10:50]

I read that the director said 'he isn't to everyones taste so we don't want him'. So, wouldn't the people that WANTED to watch him go, and those that DIDN'T, not go? Lol

It sounds more like a director using the media to promote his tiny little club that nobody's ever heard of at the expense of someone who probably doesn't give a flying fuck about whether he plays there or not. It's not like Jim Davidson needs this extra gig, he always fills his gigs wherever he plays and I for one would love to go and see him.

It's hardly a tiny little club if it has a capacity of 1200 is it?. Try doing some research first, instead of talking bollocks.

Why on earth would I want to spend seconds of my valuable time researching some unknown club whose manager wanted to get it in the headlines. Any advertising is good advertising etc, and on that basis he's done Davidson a favour hasn't he. We're all talking about him."

Maybe if you had done your research, then you would have found Davidson took to twitter to rage against not being allowed to perform at the Marlowe. The director only gave an interview after being approached by the press to respond to Davidson.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *issHottieBottieWoman
over a year ago

Kent


"From what I can make out from a google search it wasn't the theatre that made a big deal of it, it was him tweeting about it and its blown up from there. The guy who runs the Marlowe said that he didn't doubt that he would sell tickets but that jim isn't the sort of act that the theatre represents. Don't know what all the fuss it about to be honest. He got a gig in margate which is just up the road so anyone who thinks they're missing out can just go their.

He will do anything for publicity! Like most has-beens."

He'll be on 'celebrity' big brother next x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *riendly foeWoman
over a year ago

In a crisp poke on the A814


"[Removed by poster at 05/04/13 02:10:50]

I read that the director said 'he isn't to everyones taste so we don't want him'. So, wouldn't the people that WANTED to watch him go, and those that DIDN'T, not go? Lol"

Cant stand the man myself....

But.............

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"[Removed by poster at 05/04/13 02:10:50]

I read that the director said 'he isn't to everyones taste so we don't want him'. So, wouldn't the people that WANTED to watch him go, and those that DIDN'T, not go? Lol

It sounds more like a director using the media to promote his tiny little club that nobody's ever heard of at the expense of someone who probably doesn't give a flying fuck about whether he plays there or not. It's not like Jim Davidson needs this extra gig, he always fills his gigs wherever he plays and I for one would love to go and see him."

I suspect that the reason he fills out the theatres (if indeed he does) is becuase his current tour is playing such legendary venues as Barry Memorial Hall... He's playing tiny venues and primarily in backwater towns where very little happens.

He's an offensive biggoted idiot who has long since past his sell by date and his days of playing half decent venues are thankfully long since gone.

And as pointed out elsewhere on the thread it wasn;t the theatre that put this in the public domain

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Jim Davidson is a moderately famous comedian who is past his zenith and is skiing ever faster downhill as the days go by, a moderately interesting subject on a small 'specialist' forum. Why peeps need to get nasty with each other with barbed comments and some semi personal remarks is beyond me, whats the point of being like that?

Everybodys comments are equal and there is no need at all to get nasty over things."

Semi personal remarks is an interesting turn of phrase.

I think that if those contributing here were all first timers you would be right to hold us all in contempt.

But I think it's safe to say we all know the measure of each other. We've danced enough!

Nice sentiment though.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Same here, can't stand the bigoted, Tory twat...but I don't believe in censorship either.

Let people hear how outlandish your ideas are and then they can make up their own minds.

"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Jim Davidson is a moderately famous comedian who is past his zenith and is skiing ever faster downhill as the days go by, a moderately interesting subject on a small 'specialist' forum. Why peeps need to get nasty with each other with barbed comments and some semi personal remarks is beyond me, whats the point of being like that?

Everybodys comments are equal and there is no need at all to get nasty over things.

Semi personal remarks is an interesting turn of phrase.

I think that if those contributing here were all first timers you would be right to hold us all in contempt.

But I think it's safe to say we all know the measure of each other. We've danced enough!

Nice sentiment though. "

Errrr, you sure you got the right thread, who holds who in contempt? I never said or feel that.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Jim Davidson is a moderately famous comedian who is past his zenith and is skiing ever faster downhill as the days go by, a moderately interesting subject on a small 'specialist' forum. Why peeps need to get nasty with each other with barbed comments and some semi personal remarks is beyond me, whats the point of being like that?

Everybodys comments are equal and there is no need at all to get nasty over things.

Semi personal remarks is an interesting turn of phrase.

I think that if those contributing here were all first timers you would be right to hold us all in contempt.

But I think it's safe to say we all know the measure of each other. We've danced enough!

Nice sentiment though.

Errrr, you sure you got the right thread, who holds who in contempt? I never said or feel that."

What would you call it then?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *am123Man
over a year ago

essex chelmsford

I have seen jim davidson 3 times at the cliffs, and found him very funny, altho a lot of what you have said above i was unaware of, and has put me off slightly.I could imagine him being an arrogant twat, by his body language, but never met the fella and now wouldn't want to

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *bfoxxxMan
over a year ago

Crete or LANCASTER

A joke is just that - a joke.

Search google for jokes about . . . . And you'll find it.

The surest way to get success is the controversy of being banned. The BBC ensured millions of record sales by banning Je taime, and Sex Pistols etc

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *bfoxxxMan
over a year ago

Crete or LANCASTER

A joke is just that - a joke.

Search google for jokes about . . . . And you'll find it.

The surest way to get success is the controversy of being banned. The BBC ensured millions of record sales by banning Je taime, and Sex Pistols etc

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *bfoxxxMan
over a year ago

Crete or LANCASTER


"Cannot stand him. His jokes include ones about cancer sufferers, rape victims, wheelchair users, homosexuals, not to mention the ubiquitous racist jokes. He even refused to go on stage once because there were wheelchair users in the front row - he wanted them to be moved. He became a tax exile to Dubai but came back in 2010. He also was a 'character witness' for a vile criminal who was up on drug charges and who was subsequently given 30 years - so moves in some really nice circles. He is an alcoholic and serial wife abuser. And has been declared bankrupt. Yeah, nice guy."

So he should be an MP . . . UKIP. Tory, Lib Dem or Labour ?

Suggestions . . .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow

Jim Davidson will face no further action over alleged sexual offences in the UK, the CPS has said.

The 59-year-old was first arrested in January by detectives from Operation Yewtree, which was set up after the Jimmy Savile scandal - although his arrest was not linked to Savile.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23787754

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Did Jim Davidson want to perform in this theatre ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Thought he was dead

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Jim Davidson will face no further action over alleged sexual offences in the UK, the CPS has said.

The 59-year-old was first arrested in January by detectives from Operation Yewtree, which was set up after the Jimmy Savile scandal - although his arrest was not linked to Savile.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23787754"

Any evidence, if any, is of sufficiently poor standard then?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top