Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |  |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
It kind of looks unfinished to me.
Evie | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I quite like it. Every official royal portrait in the history of the long as been deeply symbolic. This one's no different but I'm not entirely sure what the symbolism means" Yes, you are right there, all those portraits have been deeply symbolic, same here. I dont know what it means, it would be interesting to know what the symbols means too | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just looks like a face in a pot of jam - most likely Queen Meghan's strawberry jam." Ewwwww but also .... I agree ! Bloody awful, pardon the pun | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I quite like it. Every official royal portrait in the history of the long as been deeply symbolic. This one's no different but I'm not entirely sure what the symbolism meansYes, you are right there, all those portraits have been deeply symbolic, same here. I dont know what it means, it would be interesting to know what the symbols means too "The artist has explained a few such as the butterfly and the use of red. I suppose that people will place their own interpretation on it I find it interesting that he's square on to the viewer, no slight side angle just straightforward, direct gaze | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I quite like it. Every official royal portrait in the history of the long as been deeply symbolic. This one's no different but I'm not entirely sure what the symbolism meansYes, you are right there, all those portraits have been deeply symbolic, same here. I dont know what it means, it would be interesting to know what the symbols means too
The artist has explained a few such as the butterfly and the use of red. I suppose that people will place their own interpretation on it
I find it interesting that he's square on to the viewer, no slight side angle just straightforward, direct gaze"I see, that is good that he explained a few of them, like he butterfly there and the use of red. I will see what he said about them and yes, that is interesting about angle, just straight forward too | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Eight fucking million? Time to put that cunt on the guillotine." https://amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/jan/15/government-unveils-free-portrait-of-king-charles-for-public-buildings | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Eight fucking million? Time to put that cunt on the guillotine." I hope is not the red picture that is going to be sent to buildings. I still can't find out who paid for the Red Picture I suspect it was the king, | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Eight fucking million? Time to put that cunt on the guillotine." Sovereign grant is £86million this year So this is not a lot really. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Have you seen it and what do you think of it? It kind of gives mixed messages I think. On one side it is cool, but on the other side which I agree with others who have critised it, is that, it looks kinda satanic doesnt it with all the red, like we are entering a new age of world order. When you look at it, you dont really see what it is, to me it seems like the background is more important than the subject of it. I find it a bit strange, dont you? "What do you mean by a new age of world order? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Have you seen it and what do you think of it? It kind of gives mixed messages I think. On one side it is cool, but on the other side which I agree with others who have critised it, is that, it looks kinda satanic doesnt it with all the red, like we are entering a new age of world order. When you look at it, you dont really see what it is, to me it seems like the background is more important than the subject of it. I find it a bit strange, dont you?
What do you mean by a new age of world order? "They're releasing a new album | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I quite like it. Every official royal portrait in the history of the long as been deeply symbolic. This one's no different but I'm not entirely sure what the symbolism means" If its to represent the blood spilled in the name of the British Empire they've absolutely nailed it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does anyone remember Ghostbusters 2? "I’m fairly sure Charles isn’t a Carpathian. Much less a sorcerer…. Although it would be quite cool. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does anyone remember Ghostbusters 2?
I’m fairly sure Charles isn’t a Carpathian. Much less a sorcerer….
Although it would be quite cool."Vigo, the king of England | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's interesting but could have done with extra details " Yes, it could have done with more details too  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This has full on ghost busters portrait vibes, I've only just seen it thanks to this thread. I'm sure many others will have made that connection, surely." I've never seen that film so ... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It can't be satanic.....it has a butterfly on his shoulder
It kind of looks unfinished to me.
Evie "Yes, you are right there, as it have a butterfly on it, same here. I also think it looks unfinished too | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think from an historical perspective this might not go down as one of the most popular royal portraits "Without doubt Charles the firsts portraits' by van Dyke steals the show for me with different views from one side of the head to the other when I first saw those paintings I was captivated by them, nothing was to much for Van dyke and all the great painters like him... Just sorry that cromwell had the last word. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It can't be satanic.....it has a butterfly on his shoulder
It kind of looks unfinished to me.
Evie Yes, you are right there, as it have a butterfly on it, same here. I also think it looks unfinished too "But how would it be more finished, | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think from an historical perspective this might not go down as one of the most popular royal portraits Without doubt Charles the firsts portraits' by van Dyke steals the show for me with different views from one side of the head to the other when I first saw those paintings I was captivated by them, nothing was to much for Van dyke and all the great painters like him... Just sorry that cromwell had the last word."That three views one is fascinating because in the full profile on the left he almost looks like a different person. Poor chap | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think from an historical perspective this might not go down as one of the most popular royal portraits Without doubt Charles the firsts portraits' by van Dyke steals the show for me with different views from one side of the head to the other when I first saw those paintings I was captivated by them, nothing was to much for Van dyke and all the great painters like him... Just sorry that cromwell had the last word.
That three views one is fascinating because in the full profile on the left he almost looks like a different person. Poor chap"True.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think from an historical perspective this might not go down as one of the most popular royal portraits Without doubt Charles the firsts portraits' by van Dyke steals the show for me with different views from one side of the head to the other when I first saw those paintings I was captivated by them, nothing was to much for Van dyke and all the great painters like him... Just sorry that cromwell had the last word."I rather have a democracy than a man who thought God gave him England and everyone in it as his toy. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
