Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nope, but I have an intimate relationship with Synchronicity. " Is that like deja vu? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nope, but I have an intimate relationship with Synchronicity. Is that like deja vu?" No, mostly - and yes, a bit. Meaningful coincidence (Jung's term), although Pauli (quantum physicist and his colleague on this topic) preferred "meaningful correspondence". Deja Vu is the same thing experienced before, sometimes multiple times, Synchronicity is coincidences at either particularly elevated emotional moments, or coincidences that would baffle traditional probability theories. DV and S come from the same place though - information, consciousness, matter and time wrapped up in ways we'd rather not think about. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nope, but I have an intimate relationship with Synchronicity. Is that like deja vu? No, mostly - and yes, a bit. Meaningful coincidence (Jung's term), although Pauli (quantum physicist and his colleague on this topic) preferred "meaningful correspondence". Deja Vu is the same thing experienced before, sometimes multiple times, Synchronicity is coincidences at either particularly elevated emotional moments, or coincidences that would baffle traditional probability theories. DV and S come from the same place though - information, consciousness, matter and time wrapped up in ways we'd rather not think about." Have you read Nietzsche’s philosophy of external recurrence? I think you’d enjoy that. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nope, but I have an intimate relationship with Synchronicity. Is that like deja vu? No, mostly - and yes, a bit. Meaningful coincidence (Jung's term), although Pauli (quantum physicist and his colleague on this topic) preferred "meaningful correspondence". Deja Vu is the same thing experienced before, sometimes multiple times, Synchronicity is coincidences at either particularly elevated emotional moments, or coincidences that would baffle traditional probability theories. DV and S come from the same place though - information, consciousness, matter and time wrapped up in ways we'd rather not think about." So a bit like if I think of tits and then 5 minutes later a pair pop up in my inbox?... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You would love me Homer Simpson torso "I can't say who but there's a profile that brightens my day | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nope, but I have an intimate relationship with Synchronicity. Is that like deja vu? No, mostly - and yes, a bit. Meaningful coincidence (Jung's term), although Pauli (quantum physicist and his colleague on this topic) preferred "meaningful correspondence". Deja Vu is the same thing experienced before, sometimes multiple times, Synchronicity is coincidences at either particularly elevated emotional moments, or coincidences that would baffle traditional probability theories. DV and S come from the same place though - information, consciousness, matter and time wrapped up in ways we'd rather not think about. So a bit like if I think of tits and then 5 minutes later a pair pop up in my inbox?..." No. You think of tits too often, and ask for them to your inbox too frequently, for that to be anything other than a near-certainty Willy  . | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nope, but I have an intimate relationship with Synchronicity. Is that like deja vu? No, mostly - and yes, a bit. Meaningful coincidence (Jung's term), although Pauli (quantum physicist and his colleague on this topic) preferred "meaningful correspondence". Deja Vu is the same thing experienced before, sometimes multiple times, Synchronicity is coincidences at either particularly elevated emotional moments, or coincidences that would baffle traditional probability theories. DV and S come from the same place though - information, consciousness, matter and time wrapped up in ways we'd rather not think about. So a bit like if I think of tits and then 5 minutes later a pair pop up in my inbox?... No. You think of tits too often, and ask for them to your inbox too frequently, for that to be anything other than a near-certainty Willy ."Ahh. Worth a try  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nope, but I have an intimate relationship with Synchronicity. Is that like deja vu? No, mostly - and yes, a bit. Meaningful coincidence (Jung's term), although Pauli (quantum physicist and his colleague on this topic) preferred "meaningful correspondence". Deja Vu is the same thing experienced before, sometimes multiple times, Synchronicity is coincidences at either particularly elevated emotional moments, or coincidences that would baffle traditional probability theories. DV and S come from the same place though - information, consciousness, matter and time wrapped up in ways we'd rather not think about. Have you read Nietzsche’s philosophy of external recurrence? I think you’d enjoy that. " Not this one of N's, but I've done a lot of work on David Bohm, within whose work (Implicate Order, Holography) things like Synchronicity and Panpsychism find materialist explanations for their existence (as well as other things). Am also connected to 3 profs who continue the Bohm/Jung/Pauli work along on physics, psychology, and philosophy. The materialist explanation for these things upends classical scientific thought, and it's madder than any religion or spirituality you could ever think of. Plus, I'm psychic, and a materialist, and an atheist. So I can touch the rational and mad sides of it equally. Do you like William Blake Glow? Infinity in every thing. Not infinity in everything. Every THING. His mad poetry and art was 150/200 years ahead of the psychology (Jung) and the physics (Bohm, Pauli). I love Will Blake. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nope, but I have an intimate relationship with Synchronicity. Is that like deja vu? No, mostly - and yes, a bit. Meaningful coincidence (Jung's term), although Pauli (quantum physicist and his colleague on this topic) preferred "meaningful correspondence". Deja Vu is the same thing experienced before, sometimes multiple times, Synchronicity is coincidences at either particularly elevated emotional moments, or coincidences that would baffle traditional probability theories. DV and S come from the same place though - information, consciousness, matter and time wrapped up in ways we'd rather not think about. Have you read Nietzsche’s philosophy of external recurrence? I think you’d enjoy that. Not this one of N's, but I've done a lot of work on David Bohm, within whose work (Implicate Order, Holography) things like Synchronicity and Panpsychism find materialist explanations for their existence (as well as other things). Am also connected to 3 profs who continue the Bohm/Jung/Pauli work along on physics, psychology, and philosophy. The materialist explanation for these things upends classical scientific thought, and it's madder than any religion or spirituality you could ever think of. Plus, I'm psychic, and a materialist, and an atheist. So I can touch the rational and mad sides of it equally. Do you like William Blake Glow? Infinity in every thing. Not infinity in everything. Every THING. His mad poetry and art was 150/200 years ahead of the psychology (Jung) and the physics (Bohm, Pauli). I love Will Blake." Back to the faces... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nope, but I have an intimate relationship with Synchronicity. Is that like deja vu? No, mostly - and yes, a bit. Meaningful coincidence (Jung's term), although Pauli (quantum physicist and his colleague on this topic) preferred "meaningful correspondence". Deja Vu is the same thing experienced before, sometimes multiple times, Synchronicity is coincidences at either particularly elevated emotional moments, or coincidences that would baffle traditional probability theories. DV and S come from the same place though - information, consciousness, matter and time wrapped up in ways we'd rather not think about. Have you read Nietzsche’s philosophy of external recurrence? I think you’d enjoy that. Not this one of N's, but I've done a lot of work on David Bohm, within whose work (Implicate Order, Holography) things like Synchronicity and Panpsychism find materialist explanations for their existence (as well as other things). Am also connected to 3 profs who continue the Bohm/Jung/Pauli work along on physics, psychology, and philosophy. The materialist explanation for these things upends classical scientific thought, and it's madder than any religion or spirituality you could ever think of. Plus, I'm psychic, and a materialist, and an atheist. So I can touch the rational and mad sides of it equally. Do you like William Blake Glow? Infinity in every thing. Not infinity in everything. Every THING. His mad poetry and art was 150/200 years ahead of the psychology (Jung) and the physics (Bohm, Pauli). I love Will Blake. Back to the faces... "Safest   x | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nope, but I have an intimate relationship with Synchronicity. Is that like deja vu? No, mostly - and yes, a bit. Meaningful coincidence (Jung's term), although Pauli (quantum physicist and his colleague on this topic) preferred "meaningful correspondence". Deja Vu is the same thing experienced before, sometimes multiple times, Synchronicity is coincidences at either particularly elevated emotional moments, or coincidences that would baffle traditional probability theories. DV and S come from the same place though - information, consciousness, matter and time wrapped up in ways we'd rather not think about. Have you read Nietzsche’s philosophy of external recurrence? I think you’d enjoy that. Not this one of N's, but I've done a lot of work on David Bohm, within whose work (Implicate Order, Holography) things like Synchronicity and Panpsychism find materialist explanations for their existence (as well as other things). Am also connected to 3 profs who continue the Bohm/Jung/Pauli work along on physics, psychology, and philosophy. The materialist explanation for these things upends classical scientific thought, and it's madder than any religion or spirituality you could ever think of. Plus, I'm psychic, and a materialist, and an atheist. So I can touch the rational and mad sides of it equally. Do you like William Blake Glow? Infinity in every thing. Not infinity in everything. Every THING. His mad poetry and art was 150/200 years ahead of the psychology (Jung) and the physics (Bohm, Pauli). I love Will Blake." Hold infinity in the palm of your hand Have you seen the online AI art of worlds within tiny details of worlds, just an ongoing sequence of places within the tiniest details of places? I adore them. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nope, but I have an intimate relationship with Synchronicity. Is that like deja vu? No, mostly - and yes, a bit. Meaningful coincidence (Jung's term), although Pauli (quantum physicist and his colleague on this topic) preferred "meaningful correspondence". Deja Vu is the same thing experienced before, sometimes multiple times, Synchronicity is coincidences at either particularly elevated emotional moments, or coincidences that would baffle traditional probability theories. DV and S come from the same place though - information, consciousness, matter and time wrapped up in ways we'd rather not think about. Have you read Nietzsche’s philosophy of external recurrence? I think you’d enjoy that. Not this one of N's, but I've done a lot of work on David Bohm, within whose work (Implicate Order, Holography) things like Synchronicity and Panpsychism find materialist explanations for their existence (as well as other things). Am also connected to 3 profs who continue the Bohm/Jung/Pauli work along on physics, psychology, and philosophy. The materialist explanation for these things upends classical scientific thought, and it's madder than any religion or spirituality you could ever think of. Plus, I'm psychic, and a materialist, and an atheist. So I can touch the rational and mad sides of it equally. Do you like William Blake Glow? Infinity in every thing. Not infinity in everything. Every THING. His mad poetry and art was 150/200 years ahead of the psychology (Jung) and the physics (Bohm, Pauli). I love Will Blake." Au contraire, reason for human existence  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nope, but I have an intimate relationship with Synchronicity. Is that like deja vu? No, mostly - and yes, a bit. Meaningful coincidence (Jung's term), although Pauli (quantum physicist and his colleague on this topic) preferred "meaningful correspondence". Deja Vu is the same thing experienced before, sometimes multiple times, Synchronicity is coincidences at either particularly elevated emotional moments, or coincidences that would baffle traditional probability theories. DV and S come from the same place though - information, consciousness, matter and time wrapped up in ways we'd rather not think about. Have you read Nietzsche’s philosophy of external recurrence? I think you’d enjoy that. Not this one of N's, but I've done a lot of work on David Bohm, within whose work (Implicate Order, Holography) things like Synchronicity and Panpsychism find materialist explanations for their existence (as well as other things). Am also connected to 3 profs who continue the Bohm/Jung/Pauli work along on physics, psychology, and philosophy. The materialist explanation for these things upends classical scientific thought, and it's madder than any religion or spirituality you could ever think of. Plus, I'm psychic, and a materialist, and an atheist. So I can touch the rational and mad sides of it equally. Do you like William Blake Glow? Infinity in every thing. Not infinity in everything. Every THING. His mad poetry and art was 150/200 years ahead of the psychology (Jung) and the physics (Bohm, Pauli). I love Will Blake. Back to the faces... "So when you call someone a dickhead… | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nope, but I have an intimate relationship with Synchronicity. Is that like deja vu? No, mostly - and yes, a bit. Meaningful coincidence (Jung's term), although Pauli (quantum physicist and his colleague on this topic) preferred "meaningful correspondence". Deja Vu is the same thing experienced before, sometimes multiple times, Synchronicity is coincidences at either particularly elevated emotional moments, or coincidences that would baffle traditional probability theories. DV and S come from the same place though - information, consciousness, matter and time wrapped up in ways we'd rather not think about. Have you read Nietzsche’s philosophy of external recurrence? I think you’d enjoy that. Not this one of N's, but I've done a lot of work on David Bohm, within whose work (Implicate Order, Holography) things like Synchronicity and Panpsychism find materialist explanations for their existence (as well as other things). Am also connected to 3 profs who continue the Bohm/Jung/Pauli work along on physics, psychology, and philosophy. The materialist explanation for these things upends classical scientific thought, and it's madder than any religion or spirituality you could ever think of. Plus, I'm psychic, and a materialist, and an atheist. So I can touch the rational and mad sides of it equally. Do you like William Blake Glow? Infinity in every thing. Not infinity in everything. Every THING. His mad poetry and art was 150/200 years ahead of the psychology (Jung) and the physics (Bohm, Pauli). I love Will Blake. Hold infinity in the palm of your hand Have you seen the online AI art of worlds within tiny details of worlds, just an ongoing sequence of places within the tiniest details of places? I adore them. " Are these the one's that just keep zooming in? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nope, but I have an intimate relationship with Synchronicity. Is that like deja vu? No, mostly - and yes, a bit. Meaningful coincidence (Jung's term), although Pauli (quantum physicist and his colleague on this topic) preferred "meaningful correspondence". Deja Vu is the same thing experienced before, sometimes multiple times, Synchronicity is coincidences at either particularly elevated emotional moments, or coincidences that would baffle traditional probability theories. DV and S come from the same place though - information, consciousness, matter and time wrapped up in ways we'd rather not think about. Have you read Nietzsche’s philosophy of external recurrence? I think you’d enjoy that. Not this one of N's, but I've done a lot of work on David Bohm, within whose work (Implicate Order, Holography) things like Synchronicity and Panpsychism find materialist explanations for their existence (as well as other things). Am also connected to 3 profs who continue the Bohm/Jung/Pauli work along on physics, psychology, and philosophy. The materialist explanation for these things upends classical scientific thought, and it's madder than any religion or spirituality you could ever think of. Plus, I'm psychic, and a materialist, and an atheist. So I can touch the rational and mad sides of it equally. Do you like William Blake Glow? Infinity in every thing. Not infinity in everything. Every THING. His mad poetry and art was 150/200 years ahead of the psychology (Jung) and the physics (Bohm, Pauli). I love Will Blake. Hold infinity in the palm of your hand Have you seen the online AI art of worlds within tiny details of worlds, just an ongoing sequence of places within the tiniest details of places? I adore them. Are these the one's that just keep zooming in?" Yes! Zooming in …I was trying to think of that word | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nope, but I have an intimate relationship with Synchronicity. Is that like deja vu? No, mostly - and yes, a bit. Meaningful coincidence (Jung's term), although Pauli (quantum physicist and his colleague on this topic) preferred "meaningful correspondence". Deja Vu is the same thing experienced before, sometimes multiple times, Synchronicity is coincidences at either particularly elevated emotional moments, or coincidences that would baffle traditional probability theories. DV and S come from the same place though - information, consciousness, matter and time wrapped up in ways we'd rather not think about. Have you read Nietzsche’s philosophy of external recurrence? I think you’d enjoy that. Not this one of N's, but I've done a lot of work on David Bohm, within whose work (Implicate Order, Holography) things like Synchronicity and Panpsychism find materialist explanations for their existence (as well as other things). Am also connected to 3 profs who continue the Bohm/Jung/Pauli work along on physics, psychology, and philosophy. The materialist explanation for these things upends classical scientific thought, and it's madder than any religion or spirituality you could ever think of. Plus, I'm psychic, and a materialist, and an atheist. So I can touch the rational and mad sides of it equally. Do you like William Blake Glow? Infinity in every thing. Not infinity in everything. Every THING. His mad poetry and art was 150/200 years ahead of the psychology (Jung) and the physics (Bohm, Pauli). I love Will Blake. Hold infinity in the palm of your hand Have you seen the online AI art of worlds within tiny details of worlds, just an ongoing sequence of places within the tiniest details of places? I adore them. Are these the one's that just keep zooming in? Yes! Zooming in …I was trying to think of that word " Love those. They're incredible to watch and very cleverly done | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nope, but I have an intimate relationship with Synchronicity. Is that like deja vu? No, mostly - and yes, a bit. Meaningful coincidence (Jung's term), although Pauli (quantum physicist and his colleague on this topic) preferred "meaningful correspondence". Deja Vu is the same thing experienced before, sometimes multiple times, Synchronicity is coincidences at either particularly elevated emotional moments, or coincidences that would baffle traditional probability theories. DV and S come from the same place though - information, consciousness, matter and time wrapped up in ways we'd rather not think about. Have you read Nietzsche’s philosophy of external recurrence? I think you’d enjoy that. Not this one of N's, but I've done a lot of work on David Bohm, within whose work (Implicate Order, Holography) things like Synchronicity and Panpsychism find materialist explanations for their existence (as well as other things). Am also connected to 3 profs who continue the Bohm/Jung/Pauli work along on physics, psychology, and philosophy. The materialist explanation for these things upends classical scientific thought, and it's madder than any religion or spirituality you could ever think of. Plus, I'm psychic, and a materialist, and an atheist. So I can touch the rational and mad sides of it equally. Do you like William Blake Glow? Infinity in every thing. Not infinity in everything. Every THING. His mad poetry and art was 150/200 years ahead of the psychology (Jung) and the physics (Bohm, Pauli). I love Will Blake. Hold infinity in the palm of your hand Have you seen the online AI art of worlds within tiny details of worlds, just an ongoing sequence of places within the tiniest details of places? I adore them. " There's a guy called Tim Palmer who has used fractals to bring quantum and relativity together. His earlier work is the reason we now have far better disaster forecasting after the famous "Michael Fish no storm 1987" fiasco. He used fractals and chaos theory to derive more accurate probabilities in the late 80s/90s, and he's trying to persuade people that the same thinking can bring together quantum and relative without "spooky action at a distance". I think he's onto something, but I'm not sure our minds can cope with it. Nothing we believe to be real would be real in the way we want it to be. Or our politics - it's likely to be able to be switched into such a profound energy release that nukes look like a fart in a bath. We're not quite ready for that as a reality, even if it is the truest version of reality we've yet stumbled across. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nope, but I have an intimate relationship with Synchronicity. Is that like deja vu? No, mostly - and yes, a bit. Meaningful coincidence (Jung's term), although Pauli (quantum physicist and his colleague on this topic) preferred "meaningful correspondence". Deja Vu is the same thing experienced before, sometimes multiple times, Synchronicity is coincidences at either particularly elevated emotional moments, or coincidences that would baffle traditional probability theories. DV and S come from the same place though - information, consciousness, matter and time wrapped up in ways we'd rather not think about. Have you read Nietzsche’s philosophy of external recurrence? I think you’d enjoy that. Not this one of N's, but I've done a lot of work on David Bohm, within whose work (Implicate Order, Holography) things like Synchronicity and Panpsychism find materialist explanations for their existence (as well as other things). Am also connected to 3 profs who continue the Bohm/Jung/Pauli work along on physics, psychology, and philosophy. The materialist explanation for these things upends classical scientific thought, and it's madder than any religion or spirituality you could ever think of. Plus, I'm psychic, and a materialist, and an atheist. So I can touch the rational and mad sides of it equally. Do you like William Blake Glow? Infinity in every thing. Not infinity in everything. Every THING. His mad poetry and art was 150/200 years ahead of the psychology (Jung) and the physics (Bohm, Pauli). I love Will Blake. Hold infinity in the palm of your hand Have you seen the online AI art of worlds within tiny details of worlds, just an ongoing sequence of places within the tiniest details of places? I adore them. There's a guy called Tim Palmer who has used fractals to bring quantum and relativity together. His earlier work is the reason we now have far better disaster forecasting after the famous "Michael Fish no storm 1987" fiasco. He used fractals and chaos theory to derive more accurate probabilities in the late 80s/90s, and he's trying to persuade people that the same thinking can bring together quantum and relative without "spooky action at a distance". I think he's onto something, but I'm not sure our minds can cope with it. Nothing we believe to be real would be real in the way we want it to be. Or our politics - it's likely to be able to be switched into such a profound energy release that nukes look like a fart in a bath. We're not quite ready for that as a reality, even if it is the truest version of reality we've yet stumbled across. " I’m fairly intelligent (I think) but I struggle to keep up with you sometimes Nicky | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nope, but I have an intimate relationship with Synchronicity. Is that like deja vu? No, mostly - and yes, a bit. Meaningful coincidence (Jung's term), although Pauli (quantum physicist and his colleague on this topic) preferred "meaningful correspondence". Deja Vu is the same thing experienced before, sometimes multiple times, Synchronicity is coincidences at either particularly elevated emotional moments, or coincidences that would baffle traditional probability theories. DV and S come from the same place though - information, consciousness, matter and time wrapped up in ways we'd rather not think about. Have you read Nietzsche’s philosophy of external recurrence? I think you’d enjoy that. Not this one of N's, but I've done a lot of work on David Bohm, within whose work (Implicate Order, Holography) things like Synchronicity and Panpsychism find materialist explanations for their existence (as well as other things). Am also connected to 3 profs who continue the Bohm/Jung/Pauli work along on physics, psychology, and philosophy. The materialist explanation for these things upends classical scientific thought, and it's madder than any religion or spirituality you could ever think of. Plus, I'm psychic, and a materialist, and an atheist. So I can touch the rational and mad sides of it equally. Do you like William Blake Glow? Infinity in every thing. Not infinity in everything. Every THING. His mad poetry and art was 150/200 years ahead of the psychology (Jung) and the physics (Bohm, Pauli). I love Will Blake. Hold infinity in the palm of your hand Have you seen the online AI art of worlds within tiny details of worlds, just an ongoing sequence of places within the tiniest details of places? I adore them. There's a guy called Tim Palmer who has used fractals to bring quantum and relativity together. His earlier work is the reason we now have far better disaster forecasting after the famous "Michael Fish no storm 1987" fiasco. He used fractals and chaos theory to derive more accurate probabilities in the late 80s/90s, and he's trying to persuade people that the same thinking can bring together quantum and relative without "spooky action at a distance". I think he's onto something, but I'm not sure our minds can cope with it. Nothing we believe to be real would be real in the way we want it to be. Or our politics - it's likely to be able to be switched into such a profound energy release that nukes look like a fart in a bath. We're not quite ready for that as a reality, even if it is the truest version of reality we've yet stumbled across. I’m fairly intelligent (I think) but I struggle to keep up with you sometimes Nicky " You're very intelligent glow xxx | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nope, but I have an intimate relationship with Synchronicity. Is that like deja vu? No, mostly - and yes, a bit. Meaningful coincidence (Jung's term), although Pauli (quantum physicist and his colleague on this topic) preferred "meaningful correspondence". Deja Vu is the same thing experienced before, sometimes multiple times, Synchronicity is coincidences at either particularly elevated emotional moments, or coincidences that would baffle traditional probability theories. DV and S come from the same place though - information, consciousness, matter and time wrapped up in ways we'd rather not think about. Have you read Nietzsche’s philosophy of external recurrence? I think you’d enjoy that. Not this one of N's, but I've done a lot of work on David Bohm, within whose work (Implicate Order, Holography) things like Synchronicity and Panpsychism find materialist explanations for their existence (as well as other things). Am also connected to 3 profs who continue the Bohm/Jung/Pauli work along on physics, psychology, and philosophy. The materialist explanation for these things upends classical scientific thought, and it's madder than any religion or spirituality you could ever think of. Plus, I'm psychic, and a materialist, and an atheist. So I can touch the rational and mad sides of it equally. Do you like William Blake Glow? Infinity in every thing. Not infinity in everything. Every THING. His mad poetry and art was 150/200 years ahead of the psychology (Jung) and the physics (Bohm, Pauli). I love Will Blake. Au contraire, reason for human existence "Yup xxxx | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
.
Night all x | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nope, but I have an intimate relationship with Synchronicity. Is that like deja vu? No, mostly - and yes, a bit. Meaningful coincidence (Jung's term), although Pauli (quantum physicist and his colleague on this topic) preferred "meaningful correspondence". Deja Vu is the same thing experienced before, sometimes multiple times, Synchronicity is coincidences at either particularly elevated emotional moments, or coincidences that would baffle traditional probability theories. DV and S come from the same place though - information, consciousness, matter and time wrapped up in ways we'd rather not think about. Have you read Nietzsche’s philosophy of external recurrence? I think you’d enjoy that. Not this one of N's, but I've done a lot of work on David Bohm, within whose work (Implicate Order, Holography) things like Synchronicity and Panpsychism find materialist explanations for their existence (as well as other things). Am also connected to 3 profs who continue the Bohm/Jung/Pauli work along on physics, psychology, and philosophy. The materialist explanation for these things upends classical scientific thought, and it's madder than any religion or spirituality you could ever think of. Plus, I'm psychic, and a materialist, and an atheist. So I can touch the rational and mad sides of it equally. Do you like William Blake Glow? Infinity in every thing. Not infinity in everything. Every THING. His mad poetry and art was 150/200 years ahead of the psychology (Jung) and the physics (Bohm, Pauli). I love Will Blake. Hold infinity in the palm of your hand Have you seen the online AI art of worlds within tiny details of worlds, just an ongoing sequence of places within the tiniest details of places? I adore them. There's a guy called Tim Palmer who has used fractals to bring quantum and relativity together. His earlier work is the reason we now have far better disaster forecasting after the famous "Michael Fish no storm 1987" fiasco. He used fractals and chaos theory to derive more accurate probabilities in the late 80s/90s, and he's trying to persuade people that the same thinking can bring together quantum and relative without "spooky action at a distance". I think he's onto something, but I'm not sure our minds can cope with it. Nothing we believe to be real would be real in the way we want it to be. Or our politics - it's likely to be able to be switched into such a profound energy release that nukes look like a fart in a bath. We're not quite ready for that as a reality, even if it is the truest version of reality we've yet stumbled across. I’m fairly intelligent (I think) but I struggle to keep up with you sometimes Nicky You're very intelligent glow xxx"That is to say, Bell’s Theorem assumes counterfactual quantum measurements are necessarily consistent with the laws of physics. This is the assumption that physicists don’t like to think might be wrong. If these counterfactual worlds turn out to be inconsistent with the laws of physics, then our intuitive ideas about causality will also turn out to be wrong. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nope, but I have an intimate relationship with Synchronicity. Is that like deja vu? No, mostly - and yes, a bit. Meaningful coincidence (Jung's term), although Pauli (quantum physicist and his colleague on this topic) preferred "meaningful correspondence". Deja Vu is the same thing experienced before, sometimes multiple times, Synchronicity is coincidences at either particularly elevated emotional moments, or coincidences that would baffle traditional probability theories. DV and S come from the same place though - information, consciousness, matter and time wrapped up in ways we'd rather not think about. Have you read Nietzsche’s philosophy of external recurrence? I think you’d enjoy that. Not this one of N's, but I've done a lot of work on David Bohm, within whose work (Implicate Order, Holography) things like Synchronicity and Panpsychism find materialist explanations for their existence (as well as other things). Am also connected to 3 profs who continue the Bohm/Jung/Pauli work along on physics, psychology, and philosophy. The materialist explanation for these things upends classical scientific thought, and it's madder than any religion or spirituality you could ever think of. Plus, I'm psychic, and a materialist, and an atheist. So I can touch the rational and mad sides of it equally. Do you like William Blake Glow? Infinity in every thing. Not infinity in everything. Every THING. His mad poetry and art was 150/200 years ahead of the psychology (Jung) and the physics (Bohm, Pauli). I love Will Blake. Hold infinity in the palm of your hand Have you seen the online AI art of worlds within tiny details of worlds, just an ongoing sequence of places within the tiniest details of places? I adore them. There's a guy called Tim Palmer who has used fractals to bring quantum and relativity together. His earlier work is the reason we now have far better disaster forecasting after the famous "Michael Fish no storm 1987" fiasco. He used fractals and chaos theory to derive more accurate probabilities in the late 80s/90s, and he's trying to persuade people that the same thinking can bring together quantum and relative without "spooky action at a distance". I think he's onto something, but I'm not sure our minds can cope with it. Nothing we believe to be real would be real in the way we want it to be. Or our politics - it's likely to be able to be switched into such a profound energy release that nukes look like a fart in a bath. We're not quite ready for that as a reality, even if it is the truest version of reality we've yet stumbled across. I’m fairly intelligent (I think) but I struggle to keep up with you sometimes Nicky You're very intelligent glow xxx
That is to say, Bell’s Theorem assumes counterfactual quantum measurements are necessarily consistent with the laws of physics. This is the assumption that physicists don’t like to think might be wrong. If these counterfactual worlds turn out to be inconsistent with the laws of physics, then our intuitive ideas about causality will also turn out to be wrong."I'm still here... .
Yes, and Bell effectively "proved" Bohm's work.
But Tim Palmer (fractal weather guy above) believes he's found a way to challenge Bohm/Bell using (mostly) Relativity.
However, the implications are unclear, and probably even weirder than Quantum and Relative. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You would love me Homer Simpson torso "Homer Simpson is my spirit guide. I have to see your torso! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nope, but I have an intimate relationship with Synchronicity. Is that like deja vu? No, mostly - and yes, a bit. Meaningful coincidence (Jung's term), although Pauli (quantum physicist and his colleague on this topic) preferred "meaningful correspondence". Deja Vu is the same thing experienced before, sometimes multiple times, Synchronicity is coincidences at either particularly elevated emotional moments, or coincidences that would baffle traditional probability theories. DV and S come from the same place though - information, consciousness, matter and time wrapped up in ways we'd rather not think about. Have you read Nietzsche’s philosophy of external recurrence? I think you’d enjoy that. " In fact - I lied. I have. It's part of "Beyond Good And Evil" isn't it? Which I read around 19/20. I have an awful, awful lot of time for Fred's creativity. And a lot of reservations about his philosophical conclusions. Glad we had him though xx. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nope, but I have an intimate relationship with Synchronicity. Is that like deja vu? No, mostly - and yes, a bit. Meaningful coincidence (Jung's term), although Pauli (quantum physicist and his colleague on this topic) preferred "meaningful correspondence". Deja Vu is the same thing experienced before, sometimes multiple times, Synchronicity is coincidences at either particularly elevated emotional moments, or coincidences that would baffle traditional probability theories. DV and S come from the same place though - information, consciousness, matter and time wrapped up in ways we'd rather not think about." Synchronicity can be similar to flow states. When everything clicks into place over extended periods, when events and tasks that seem complex to others flow very very easily. Been doing this since age 14 without knowing the science | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nope, but I have an intimate relationship with Synchronicity. Is that like deja vu? No, mostly - and yes, a bit. Meaningful coincidence (Jung's term), although Pauli (quantum physicist and his colleague on this topic) preferred "meaningful correspondence". Deja Vu is the same thing experienced before, sometimes multiple times, Synchronicity is coincidences at either particularly elevated emotional moments, or coincidences that would baffle traditional probability theories. DV and S come from the same place though - information, consciousness, matter and time wrapped up in ways we'd rather not think about. Synchronicity can be similar to flow states. When everything clicks into place over extended periods, when events and tasks that seem complex to others flow very very easily. Been doing this since age 14 without knowing the science " I think they'd definitely have a common root. The science is probably a few years away yet, but it'll be fascinating and odd for sure  . | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yeah I see faces in things all the time. My kitchen cupboard door has half of skeletors face on it. It’s definitely him, I’ve put a mirror against it to check. The mr " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nope, but I have an intimate relationship with Synchronicity. Is that like deja vu? No, mostly - and yes, a bit. Meaningful coincidence (Jung's term), although Pauli (quantum physicist and his colleague on this topic) preferred "meaningful correspondence". Deja Vu is the same thing experienced before, sometimes multiple times, Synchronicity is coincidences at either particularly elevated emotional moments, or coincidences that would baffle traditional probability theories. DV and S come from the same place though - information, consciousness, matter and time wrapped up in ways we'd rather not think about. Have you read Nietzsche’s philosophy of external recurrence? I think you’d enjoy that. In fact - I lied. I have. It's part of "Beyond Good And Evil" isn't it? Which I read around 19/20. I have an awful, awful lot of time for Fred's creativity. And a lot of reservations about his philosophical conclusions. Glad we had him though xx." I think he was a necessary wrecker of Kant - Hegel but didn’t actually reach a conclusion or system in his work. Just disjointed ideas. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nope, but I have an intimate relationship with Synchronicity. Is that like deja vu? No, mostly - and yes, a bit. Meaningful coincidence (Jung's term), although Pauli (quantum physicist and his colleague on this topic) preferred "meaningful correspondence". Deja Vu is the same thing experienced before, sometimes multiple times, Synchronicity is coincidences at either particularly elevated emotional moments, or coincidences that would baffle traditional probability theories. DV and S come from the same place though - information, consciousness, matter and time wrapped up in ways we'd rather not think about. Have you read Nietzsche’s philosophy of external recurrence? I think you’d enjoy that. In fact - I lied. I have. It's part of "Beyond Good And Evil" isn't it? Which I read around 19/20. I have an awful, awful lot of time for Fred's creativity. And a lot of reservations about his philosophical conclusions. Glad we had him though xx. I think he was a necessary wrecker of Kant - Hegel but didn’t actually reach a conclusion or system in his work. Just disjointed ideas. " Necessary is one of my favourite words for a lot of politics and philosophy - I'd go with that. I'm a big fan of Hegel - reminds me of Blake (and Derrida). I think there's a place beyond divinity, within materialism, they can help take us to though. I think it also requires dialetheia more than dialectic (the binary bane of Western thought). Wittgenstein is almost the (sadly, personally psychotic) avatar of that - to start out so "logical positivist, analytic", yet end so poetic, inspired, nebulously "reaching". Which does give us something of Hegel's "thesis, antithesis, synthesis". I think this round of new information contains the psychic, the holographic, the fractally re-iterative but novel. I'll find a recent piece on this across biology and astrophysics and post it here over the next day or two xx | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Here you go Glow (and Willy, and others). Novelty, patterns, and a pretty coherent disputation of evolution as "random". I think when we call something "random", we're often missing patterns that we haven't yet grappled with (which is a key part of Chaos Theory/zoomy fractals). Excerpt: "We contend that Darwinian theory is just a very special, very important case within a far larger natural phenomenon. The notion that selection for function drives evolution applies equally to stars, atoms, minerals, and many other conceptually equivalent situations where many configurations are subjected to selective pressure." Link: https://phys.org/news/2023-10-scientists-philosophers-nature-evolutionary-law.html?fbclid=IwY2xjawC2NG9leHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHRTcF319z6P3TAU9Q3M5ot_In7kbPTDcPe_uPC79PCJb9fJocGGjFOi3Yg_aem_AU69XqwmFylyAOJtQRZlVsQITqtLazc9VAlAgjjq45BGU9_XEdIjnXg6nbiHkys9HvAUL19-gAUPJCD-7sK6QE6-" That was really interesting. One of those things you read that just make intuitive sense. J | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Here you go Glow (and Willy, and others). Novelty, patterns, and a pretty coherent disputation of evolution as "random". I think when we call something "random", we're often missing patterns that we haven't yet grappled with (which is a key part of Chaos Theory/zoomy fractals). Excerpt: "We contend that Darwinian theory is just a very special, very important case within a far larger natural phenomenon. The notion that selection for function drives evolution applies equally to stars, atoms, minerals, and many other conceptually equivalent situations where many configurations are subjected to selective pressure." Link: https://phys.org/news/2023-10-scientists-philosophers-nature-evolutionary-law.html?fbclid=IwY2xjawC2NG9leHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHRTcF319z6P3TAU9Q3M5ot_In7kbPTDcPe_uPC79PCJb9fJocGGjFOi3Yg_aem_AU69XqwmFylyAOJtQRZlVsQITqtLazc9VAlAgjjq45BGU9_XEdIjnXg6nbiHkys9HvAUL19-gAUPJCD-7sK6QE6-" Science is always being proven wrong. A good chunk of it is theory until proven right or wrong. It's a very interesting theory though of Tim's and it's a shame he's in his 70s. As you said before, it usually gets used for the wrong reason and my mind is boggled. I haven't bothered watching/reading your link as it has nothing to do with faces where the nipples are eyes and the belly button is the mouth | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
