Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They stress me and I don't stress easily I tend to stay in the left at all times for some reason I think I'll be safer if there is a breakdown I almost go into a trancelike state - until I am off the 'smart' motorway and on something that feels safer.... Calling something smart - doesn't make it so. They are death to the motorist" You are actually driving to the rules of the road then. The inside lane ( LEFT) is the only lane you should be driving in theoretically unless stated otherwise. The middle and outside lanes are only meant to be used for overtaking | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I like them. If people actually learned how to use them properly they'd work much better. Strangely nobody complains about the risks of breaking down on dual carriageways with the same speed limit and no hard shoulders...... " But is not actually true because you know that is coming. It's the sudden and random nature of it that is the issue. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They stress me and I don't stress easily I tend to stay in the left at all times for some reason I think I'll be safer if there is a breakdown I almost go into a trancelike state - until I am off the 'smart' motorway and on something that feels safer.... Calling something smart - doesn't make it so. They are death to the motorist You are actually driving to the rules of the road then. The inside lane ( LEFT) is the only lane you should be driving in theoretically unless stated otherwise. The middle and outside lanes are only meant to be used for overtaking " Fuck me...... all these years driving and I never knew that | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They stress me and I don't stress easily I tend to stay in the left at all times for some reason I think I'll be safer if there is a breakdown I almost go into a trancelike state - until I am off the 'smart' motorway and on something that feels safer.... Calling something smart - doesn't make it so. They are death to the motorist You are actually driving to the rules of the road then. The inside lane ( LEFT) is the only lane you should be driving in theoretically unless stated otherwise. The middle and outside lanes are only meant to be used for overtaking Fuck me...... all these years driving and I never knew that " I just make sure im always overtaking | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I like them. If people actually learned how to use them properly they'd work much better. Strangely nobody complains about the risks of breaking down on dual carriageways with the same speed limit and no hard shoulders...... But is not actually true because you know that is coming. It's the sudden and random nature of it that is the issue. " On a dual carriageway you'd have no idea about an obstruction or broken down vehicle ahead. No idea if there was a need to reduce speed for safety. No idea if you needed to leave the road and take a diversion due to a closure. Smart motorways? Massive signs above telling you all you need to know. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They stress me and I don't stress easily I tend to stay in the left at all times for some reason I think I'll be safer if there is a breakdown I almost go into a trancelike state - until I am off the 'smart' motorway and on something that feels safer.... Calling something smart - doesn't make it so. They are death to the motorist You are actually driving to the rules of the road then. The inside lane ( LEFT) is the only lane you should be driving in theoretically unless stated otherwise. The middle and outside lanes are only meant to be used for overtaking Fuck me...... all these years driving and I never knew that I just make sure im always overtaking " I was just being sarky after my highway code lesson ..... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Smart motorway dumb idea" I agree but also agree with others who have said that driving standards have fallen. There is a special place in hell for those who dont keep left on motorways. The 3rd lane is my lane and i wont leave it for any reason drivers cause so much traffic behind them, no point having 4 lanes if you sit in the 3rd one for the entire journey. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I like them. If people actually learned how to use them properly they'd work much better. Strangely nobody complains about the risks of breaking down on dual carriageways with the same speed limit and no hard shoulders...... But is not actually true because you know that is coming. It's the sudden and random nature of it that is the issue. On a dual carriageway you'd have no idea about an obstruction or broken down vehicle ahead. No idea if there was a need to reduce speed for safety. No idea if you needed to leave the road and take a diversion due to a closure. Smart motorways? Massive signs above telling you all you need to know. " You must obviously like them and have different experiences to what I encounter daily and that's fair enough. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Smart motorway dumb idea I agree but also agree with others who have said that driving standards have fallen. There is a special place in hell for those who dont keep left on motorways. The 3rd lane is my lane and i wont leave it for any reason drivers cause so much traffic behind them, no point having 4 lanes if you sit in the 3rd one for the entire journey. " Oh I totally agree driving standards have dropped ...too many bells and whistles and distractions on modern cars | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Wonder how many people know it is now a driving offence to drive in lane 2 when the inside lane is clear " More than likely everybody | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Wonder how many people know it is now a driving offence to drive in lane 2 when the inside lane is clear " It has always been an offence, it is just now an offence that can be dealt with by Fixed Penalty Notice, whereas previously it could only be dealt with by reporting for summons | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not everyone is smart enough to use them." They're horribly unsafe for disabled people. Am I supposed to get out and get my wheelchair out in a live lane, if I break down? I know I'm a goner if I break down on one of them. I can't "go left" and climb out of the passenger seat etc. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Wonder how many people know it is now a driving offence to drive in lane 2 when the inside lane is clear " I'd suggest very few people are guilty of this. Most stick to lane 3 and 4... Some people above mentioned the signs. In theory, they should be great but besides the fact that people need to pay attention to them (and they're ignored just as much on traditional motorways), they're so often wrong that people don't believe them when they're right. (Something else I find causes confusion is that sometimes after a slower speed limit, you get a national speed limit sign, sometimes the next gantry is just blank. Can I speed up? Should I speed up? Is it not working? Is the limit back to 70?... some people assume so, some people don't). | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not everyone is smart enough to use them. They're horribly unsafe for disabled people. Am I supposed to get out and get my wheelchair out in a live lane, if I break down? I know I'm a goner if I break down on one of them. I can't "go left" and climb out of the passenger seat etc. " Don’t even start on if you got young babies / kids strapped in back seats as well | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not everyone is smart enough to use them. They're horribly unsafe for disabled people. Am I supposed to get out and get my wheelchair out in a live lane, if I break down? I know I'm a goner if I break down on one of them. I can't "go left" and climb out of the passenger seat etc. Don’t even start on if you got young babies / kids strapped in back seats as well " Yes, I've got one of those too. Either she dies with me or we chance her crossing over the barrier on her own and she makes it. She's a sensible 7yo. I hope never to have to make these decisions. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They’re now putting the hard shoulders back because shock horror narrower lanes and no shoulder causes some horrible accidents. Not according to to the news says they are not building any more but nothing about shutting the ones we already have " They are adjusting some of them and putting in emergency refugees. I lived through the roadworks to make it smart, then upgrade the barriers and now putting in emergency refuges much faster to take the train.. When they are running | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" putting in emergency refugees. " In lieu of sending them to Rwanda? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Don't start me off about lane 2 hogs or the 45mph lane 1 turd who thinks he's driving safely because he slowed down to use his mobile phone." Usually an older C/Sclass or 5series in lane 3 around here. Blacked out windows, cruising at 50. And an entire motorway of people unsure what to do. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’ve recently retired from lorry driving after 35 years and seen some terrible accidents on smart motorways , turning the hard shoulder into a running lane was a big mistake " I’m a PCV (PSV in old money) driver a few years ago I was bringing 50 passengers back to the West Midlands my vehicle had a charging fault at Worcester south jcn on m5, might have got home but was potential to lose all electrics when battery went flat(inc lights gears engine stopping) I came off at Worcester north, imagine the carnage being stuck on side of the motorway with 50 intoxicated people, with no lights etc in the pouring rain, I dropped them at pub by the rugby ground, I had a bollocking off my boss because they had to provide taxis for them who said I should have carried on, Smart motorway = stupid idea | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I work in highways and apart from a 4 year hiatus to Gas (never again) since I was 19. When they first said they were bringing it in, with the original idea of all lane running during congested times and hard shoulder when not, I discussed it with my dad (who is also highways) and some colleagues and we said it could be dangerous if any of the IT to back it up went down. Then the ones with no hard appeared and then we all said wtaf and I can't remember which smart person in power said it... but it was "hard shoulders are dangerous, so we are getting rid of them" well yes they are dangerous.. but not as dangerous as being stuck in lane 1. Then they decided to save money and extend the space between laybys from I believe a few hundred meters to every 2 miles in places. The other difficulty with this, is there is no space to get up to speed and so when exiting highways have to be contacted to put on a lane closure. Also most recovery companies won't attend until highways act and that has been known to be hours (have a few friends who work in recovery). To compound this... the radar detection system does not pick up small cars, so if you breakdown in an mx5, kit car etc... you need to hope you can get out safely and call in to the police or highways before its too late. There was recently a 6 vehicle pile up on the m6 because all of the detection software, cctv and communication with the gantries went down (for at least a few hours) and so they couldn't do anything. Slightly off subject but not. Most full electric cars when they have a fault will lock the drive train... so no matter what lane you are in, you will be stuck there like a sitting duck and without the hard shoulder... no one will be there to help you quickly and you have to just hope that the cctv/radar picks you up quickly enough before you get smashed into. I am still surprised that no one has been done for corporate manslaughter over the smart motorways." I broke down in my car on M1 between jcn 29 and 28 most terrifying moment ever was a delay of almost 5min before the lane closure sign lit up , Highways agency came and dragged me to Tibshelf services where I fixed my car in 10min and was on my way, fact is there is no way of controlling where you breakdown and pot luck if you can get to one of the refuges, in these days of Health and Safety I don’t know how it’s allowed | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They’re now putting the hard shoulders back because shock horror narrower lanes and no shoulder causes some horrible accidents. " Who would have thought that would happen? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not everyone is smart enough to use them." This, we assume to much of people haha | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Dumb idea. It is dangerous for anyone to get out of the car on a live lane if they have broken down plus if someone has broken down the response is not always instant getting those signs working to alert people. " terrified when I broke down looked out the driverside mirror and thought I’ve got to get out of here so I climbed over the passenger side something I couldn’t have done if I was a larger person, had to google highways agency for the number and tell them where I was seemed to take a lifetime I had visions of a serious pile up, | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"have on M6 by me - its supposed to reduce the congestion but it never does. People don't know how to drive on motorways, they have never been taught. You get the people sitting in lane 2 or 3 and refuse to change lane, its like they are glued to the lane - then the assholes that lane jump to overtake and undertake. yea all a nightmare - hopefully they will pass a bill for new drivers to have to have more lessons and that will include motorways and how to correctly drive on them." My issue with always having to get back to the 1st lane is this. If I'm doing 70 mph ( the legal limit ) and a distance ahead of me is a slower moving lorry , etc. I think it's safer to stay in the middle lane and only when the first it totally clear should I move back over. My reasons are that every manoeuvre carries a slight risk , so cutting down on them is a good thing. Secondly, whoever is wanting to overtake me as I'm doing 70 mph is breaking the law. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"have on M6 by me - its supposed to reduce the congestion but it never does. People don't know how to drive on motorways, they have never been taught. You get the people sitting in lane 2 or 3 and refuse to change lane, its like they are glued to the lane - then the assholes that lane jump to overtake and undertake. yea all a nightmare - hopefully they will pass a bill for new drivers to have to have more lessons and that will include motorways and how to correctly drive on them. My issue with always having to get back to the 1st lane is this. If I'm doing 70 mph ( the legal limit ) and a distance ahead of me is a slower moving lorry , etc. I think it's safer to stay in the middle lane and only when the first it totally clear should I move back over. My reasons are that every manoeuvre carries a slight risk , so cutting down on them is a good thing. Secondly, whoever is wanting to overtake me as I'm doing 70 mph is breaking the law." it’s those who piss about in the 2nd lane at 50mph going slower than HGVs that are the real problem Which leads to hgvs undertaking or tailgating , like you I don’t see a problem traveling at 70mph in lane 2, also I always try to be in lane 2 well before a junction so it makes it easier for traffic joining the motorway, if everyone used common sense there wouldn’t any problems (sadly this is lacking in a large part of the population) | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"have on M6 by me - its supposed to reduce the congestion but it never does. People don't know how to drive on motorways, they have never been taught. You get the people sitting in lane 2 or 3 and refuse to change lane, its like they are glued to the lane - then the assholes that lane jump to overtake and undertake. yea all a nightmare - hopefully they will pass a bill for new drivers to have to have more lessons and that will include motorways and how to correctly drive on them." A lot of people I see lane hogging passed their test a very long time ago. No-one on the road has done mandatory motorway driving training, it's only ever formed part of PassPlus. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"have on M6 by me - its supposed to reduce the congestion but it never does. People don't know how to drive on motorways, they have never been taught. You get the people sitting in lane 2 or 3 and refuse to change lane, its like they are glued to the lane - then the assholes that lane jump to overtake and undertake. yea all a nightmare - hopefully they will pass a bill for new drivers to have to have more lessons and that will include motorways and how to correctly drive on them." Doesnt matter how much training you have. If you have stationary cars in a lane with other vehicles doing 70...accidents are going to happen and people will die. Some wankers in the mot bought the PowerPoint presentation saying all you needed was billions of pounds to install flaky unproven tech and suddenly cars will never break down and everyone will be perfect drivers. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I noticed the sign on the gantry by Birmingham airport had spelled queue with only one e the other week. I mean jeez guys. " Is this a genuine true story? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I noticed the sign on the gantry by Birmingham airport had spelled queue with only one e the other week. I mean jeez guys. Is this a genuine true story?" Of course. Why would you doubt me! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I noticed the sign on the gantry by Birmingham airport had spelled queue with only one e the other week. I mean jeez guys. Is this a genuine true story? Of course. Why would you doubt me! " I've just never seen it so I'm always a bit suspicious. Some people lie to sound cool | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I noticed the sign on the gantry by Birmingham airport had spelled queue with only one e the other week. I mean jeez guys. Is this a genuine true story? Of course. Why would you doubt me! I've just never seen it so I'm always a bit suspicious. Some people lie to sound cool" Driving on the m42 is about as far from cool as a person can get. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I noticed the sign on the gantry by Birmingham airport had spelled queue with only one e the other week. I mean jeez guys. Is this a genuine true story? Of course. Why would you doubt me! I've just never seen it so I'm always a bit suspicious. Some people lie to sound cool Driving on the m42 is about as far from cool as a person can get." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |