FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

What film is better than the book?

Jump to newest
 

By *-MrGatsby-. OP   Man
37 weeks ago

London and Sandy

Have ever come across a situation where you've found the film adaptation is better than the original book?

My starter

Film : Angel Heart (1987)

Book : Fallen Angel - William Hjortsberg

Film : L.A. Confidential

Book : L.A. Confidential - James Ellroy

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *entlemanFoxMan
37 weeks ago

North East / London

Film: Apocalypse Now - Francis Ford Coppola

Book: Heart of Darkness - Joseph Conrad

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *-MrGatsby-. OP   Man
37 weeks ago

London and Sandy


"Film: Apocalypse Now - Francis Ford Coppola

Book: Heart of Darkness - Joseph Conrad"

Good shout

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orksRockerMan
37 weeks ago

Bradford

Shawshank Redemption - Steven King

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *illy IdolMan
37 weeks ago

Midlands

A tiger came to tea

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orksRockerMan
37 weeks ago

Bradford

A Monster Calls - Patrick Ness

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittlemissTinselTitsCouple
37 weeks ago

Southampton

The Green Mile Stephen King

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ake_or_deathMan
37 weeks ago

Manchester

Film - Blade Runner

Novel - Do Androids Dream Of Electric Sheep by Philip K. Dick

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *panksspankedMan
37 weeks ago

Edinburgh

The Godfather parts 1 and 2

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tephTV67TV/TS
37 weeks ago

Cheshire

Jaws Film.

Jaws by Peter Benchley book.

You can watch the film and read the book but there are quite a few differences between them both. Characters deaths, affairs etc…

However I think the film has the perfect three act/ structure storyline.

I would add …

The Godfather film is better than Mario Puzo book.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *cotsguyyMan
37 weeks ago

fife

Chitty Chitty Bang Bang

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *cLovin2Man
37 weeks ago

Reading


"A tiger came to tea"

I loved that book, when I was 9

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *cLovin2Man
37 weeks ago

Reading


"Jaws Film.

Jaws by Peter Benchley book.

You can watch the film and read the book but there are quite a few differences between them both. Characters deaths, affairs etc…

However I think the film has the perfect three act/ structure storyline.

I would add …

The Godfather film is better than Mario Puzo book. "

Sacrilege regarding the godfather.

The book adds so much more depth to the characters. The book is much better imo.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tephTV67TV/TS
37 weeks ago

Cheshire


"Jaws Film.

Jaws by Peter Benchley book.

You can watch the film and read the book but there are quite a few differences between them both. Characters deaths, affairs etc…

However I think the film has the perfect three act/ structure storyline.

I would add …

The Godfather film is better than Mario Puzo book.

Sacrilege regarding the godfather.

The book adds so much more depth to the characters. The book is much better imo."

You do have a point as I remember reading the book and immediately wanting to read Godfather pt 2. Then I discovered it didn’t exist so I read the Sicilian instead.

I just watched the films and got more out of them than just the original book. Both are high quality but the film(s) (for me) just pip the book.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
37 weeks ago

Who Framed Roger Rabbit

Who Censored Roger Rabbit by Gark K Wolf

-------------------------

Die Hard

Nothing Lasts Forever by Roderick Thorp

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tephTV67TV/TS
37 weeks ago

Cheshire

The Towering Inferno film much better than the two books it’s based on. The Tower and The Glass Inferno, admittedly it was over 20 years ago when I read those books so my memory could be distorted.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
37 weeks ago

The wolf of wall street...the book is trash...but Scorsese made a hell of a film out of it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *-MrGatsby-. OP   Man
37 weeks ago

London and Sandy


"Chitty Chitty Bang Bang "

So true. Practically different stories. Plus Roald Dhal (screen play) was far better writer than Ian Fleming

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *onguesandpunsMan
37 weeks ago

East Midlands


"Film: Apocalypse Now - Francis Ford Coppola

Book: Heart of Darkness - Joseph Conrad"

Great shout! The book is not much more than a short story. The film is even more amazing considering the chaotic circumstances under which it was made. Great documentary here about the making of Apocalypse Now if you haven't already seen it?

https://youtu.be/pFYzVsrrPjE?feature=shared

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ools and the brainCouple
37 weeks ago

couple, us we him her.

IT.

I found the book extremely tedious.

Also

Shogun I found the book difficult to follow with lot's of extremely long complicated names,the recent series is easier to follow.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atnip make me purrWoman
37 weeks ago

Reading

So glad noone had said the Great Gatsby. Although i enjoy both films made nothing compares to the beauty of the words in the book.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *cotsguyyMan
37 weeks ago

fife

Inkheart? Stranger than Fiction? Goosebumps?

Is it too meta to say Neverending Story ? A book made into a film where the film is being made from a book in the film?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eviewerMan
37 weeks ago

Louth

Back door sluts 3

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *cotsguyyMan
37 weeks ago

fife


"Back door sluts 3"

I liked the picture book

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *-MrGatsby-. OP   Man
37 weeks ago

London and Sandy


"So glad noone had said the Great Gatsby. Although i enjoy both films made nothing compares to the beauty of the words in the book. "

I'm certainly not going to

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ostindreamsMan
37 weeks ago

London

Fight club

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
37 weeks ago

Midnight express.

Couldn't get into the book.

Film was good though.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *helovesitwetCouple
37 weeks ago

brighton


"Have ever come across a situation where you've found the film adaptation is better than the original book?

My starter

Film : Angel Heart (1987)

Book : Fallen Angel - William Hjortsberg

Film : L.A. Confidential

Book : L.A. Confidential - James Ellroy"

jaws

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *illy IdolMan
37 weeks ago

Midlands


"A tiger came to tea

I loved that book, when I was 9"

You'll love the film then!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aizyWoman
37 weeks ago

west midlands

The Devil Wears Prada.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oot toyMan
37 weeks ago

Portchester

The Lord of the Rings…..an amazing series of films…..the books…..no, they’re too slow and boring to read

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
37 weeks ago


"Film - Blade Runner

Novel - Do Androids Dream Of Electric Sheep by Philip K. Dick"

Totally agree with this

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *acktopervMan
37 weeks ago

Stourport-On-Severn

Film: The Abyss

Book: The Abyss

This is one of those very odd film/book collaborations. The screenplay was written by James Cameron with the book written after the screenplay by Orson Scott Card. The actual film was made at the same time as the book was being written

The book was and still is shit though. The film on the other hand is pure geniius.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
37 weeks ago

The Shining

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
37 weeks ago

Silence of the Lambs

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *panksspankedMan
37 weeks ago

Edinburgh


"Jaws Film.

Jaws by Peter Benchley book.

You can watch the film and read the book but there are quite a few differences between them both. Characters deaths, affairs etc…

However I think the film has the perfect three act/ structure storyline.

I would add …

The Godfather film is better than Mario Puzo book.

Sacrilege regarding the godfather.

The book adds so much more depth to the characters. The book is much better imo.

You do have a point as I remember reading the book and immediately wanting to read Godfather pt 2. Then I discovered it didn’t exist so I read the Sicilian instead.

I just watched the films and got more out of them than just the original book. Both are high quality but the film(s) (for me) just pip the book. "

I recommend the TV series The Offer about the making of The Godfather it's great viewing too

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *panksspankedMan
37 weeks ago

Edinburgh


"Silence of the Lambs"

I disagree about this one I read it and Red Dragon before I saw the films they are terrific books and I was racing to find out what happened next. In the film of Silence of The Lambs they miss out a whole strand of the investigation and fail to explain how the cavalry arrives to rescue Clarice at the end

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ranimallxl5Man
37 weeks ago

Winchester

Stand by Me

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ostindreamsMan
37 weeks ago

London


"Film - Blade Runner

Novel - Do Androids Dream Of Electric Sheep by Philip K. Dick"

It's probably true for many PKD books turned into movies. His novels are good but usually don't go much deeper into the concepts he touches upon, giving lot of scope for the movie script writers.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uck Couple HuddsCouple
37 weeks ago

Huddersfield

It by Stephen King

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ickshawedCouple
37 weeks ago

Wolverhampton

Stardust. I preferred the ending in the film, and Robert De Niro was just perfect.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ou only live onceMan
37 weeks ago

London

Better may be a stretch, but 'The Remains of the Day' is just pitch perfect.

You would imagine any film adaptation of that book would fall short, but it captures it perfectly.

Sorry, long way of not actually answering the question!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ake_or_deathMan
37 weeks ago

Manchester

[Removed by poster at 13/04/24 17:25:29]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ake_or_deathMan
37 weeks ago

Manchester

The 1931 adaptation of Frankenstein, directed by James Whale and starring Boris Karloff.

The original novel is full of good ideas but an utter chore to read and the creature is an over-verbose bore. Karloff's wordless performance gives the creature far more pathos.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *cotsguyyMan
36 weeks ago

fife


"Stardust. I preferred the ending in the film, and Robert De Niro was just perfect. "

Strongly disagree, although the original text doesn't have DeNiro's performance the film sucked the worst of the bad bollocks. The film didn't have twenty percent of the magic or imagination the graphic novel had. A shocking cheapskate telling of a beautiful magical story.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *panksspankedMan
36 weeks ago

Edinburgh


"Stardust. I preferred the ending in the film, and Robert De Niro was just perfect.

Strongly disagree, although the original text doesn't have DeNiro's performance the film sucked the worst of the bad bollocks. The film didn't have twenty percent of the magic or imagination the graphic novel had. A shocking cheapskate telling of a beautiful magical story. "

For clarification Stardust was originally a non graphic novel. I enjoyed the movie and the book for different reasons. I seldom enjoy Ricky Gervais so it did well to overcome that with me

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uctifanoWoman
36 weeks ago

Glasgow

Hmmm not sure I’d say any film I think is better but it can add to the enjoyment and be interesting to see the book brought to life, even if you don’t like it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *avinaTVTV/TS
36 weeks ago

Transsexual Transylvania


"The Lord of the Rings…..an amazing series of films…..the books…..no, they’re too slow and boring to read "
OMG! Sacrilege!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
36 weeks ago

There IS no GODFATHER II book….there is a whole subplot involving LUCCA BRAZI that would have been chilling & fascinating viewing but I don’t think it would or could have been filmed!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uri00620Woman
36 weeks ago

Croydon

The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas. Not necessarily the whole film but the ending certainly.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *TG3Man
36 weeks ago

Dorchester

Notebook I've seen it before but have it to watch again

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lynJMan
36 weeks ago

Morden

The Bourne Identity.

I tried reading the book after seeing the film; I didn't finish it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lynJMan
36 weeks ago

Morden


"The Lord of the Rings…..an amazing series of films…..the books…..no, they’re too slow and boring to read OMG! Sacrilege!! "

The books are so much better than the films. I wouldn't watch them again and I've not seen "the hobbit" movies either.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *onjonjon44Man
36 weeks ago

sheffield

Jackie Burke, Jackie Brown. Film was an honest interpretation of the book.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *unchalMan
36 weeks ago

Dartford


"The wolf of wall street...the book is trash...but Scorsese made a hell of a film out of it. "

Really?!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
36 weeks ago


"Silence of the Lambs

I disagree about this one I read it and Red Dragon before I saw the films they are terrific books and I was racing to find out what happened next. In the film of Silence of The Lambs they miss out a whole strand of the investigation and fail to explain how the cavalry arrives to rescue Clarice at the end"

It's a close call, both are brilliant but for me the movie is a definitive telling of the story and one that has gone down in history as a true classic, which is one of the big reasons it's considered to be greater than the book.

The film brought Hannibal to life in a way that Thomas Harris could only have imagined when he penned the story.

Movie had fans on the edge of their seat throughout, with an incredible amount of tension from start to finish. Jodie Foster and Anthony Hopkins were both excellent in their performances, and the fact it dominated the Academy Awards is a real showcase of how good the movie was.

In general, we know books are much more detailed than films. Film last approx. 2 hrs whilst a book can have hundreds of pages of description. In my opinion, the movie is among the most faithful adaptations ever written.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *agneto.Man
36 weeks ago

Bham

Bourne.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icknmix500Man
36 weeks ago

South Gloucestershire

The Godfather

One flew over the cuckoo's nest

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ablo minibar123Woman
36 weeks ago

.

American psycho

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ubmissiveman2uMan
36 weeks ago

Cheshire

Kes

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
36 weeks ago


"American psycho "

Couldn't face the film after I'd read the book

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *xTwo4FunTimesxXCouple
36 weeks ago

chester

Forrest Gump. The book is bonkers!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rAitchMan
36 weeks ago

Diagonally Parked in a Parallel Universe

The rather factual Monty Python's Life Of Brian, loosly based on that fictional book The Bible

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *entlemanFoxMan
36 weeks ago

North East / London


"Film: Apocalypse Now - Francis Ford Coppola

Book: Heart of Darkness - Joseph Conrad

Great shout! The book is not much more than a short story. The film is even more amazing considering the chaotic circumstances under which it was made. Great documentary here about the making of Apocalypse Now if you haven't already seen it?

https://youtu.be/pFYzVsrrPjE?feature=shared"

Two shout outs … ‘Smells like … … Victory’

If I was going for the double, my other choice would be:

Book: Gone with the wind - Margaret Mitchell

Film: Gone with the wind - Victor Fleming

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uri00620Woman
36 weeks ago

Croydon


"Forrest Gump. The book is bonkers! "

Yes, and if I remember rightly really short too.

Like the Green Mile someone also mentioned.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *parrow77Man
36 weeks ago

cheshire

Jaws films I adore the book I struggled with as knew characters well from yrs watching favourite films and way dealt with events and situations were very different so felt like two separate views of same story.

The Meg books are different the films are fun popcorn yet the books are amazing and terrifying

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *cotsguyyMan
36 weeks ago

fife


"Forrest Gump. The book is bonkers!

Yes, and if I remember rightly really short too.

Like the Green Mile someone also mentioned."

That's similair to the Secret Life of Walter Mitty, it's a little short story too, spawned two good films, obviously the first being the better, good old Danny Kaye.

I don't think Jungle Book is a fair comparison of film/book, Rudyard Kipling is a fantastic writer but not a well known song writer and there are some great tunes in the film.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *panksspankedMan
36 weeks ago

Edinburgh


"Silence of the Lambs

I disagree about this one I read it and Red Dragon before I saw the films they are terrific books and I was racing to find out what happened next. In the film of Silence of The Lambs they miss out a whole strand of the investigation and fail to explain how the cavalry arrives to rescue Clarice at the end

It's a close call, both are brilliant but for me the movie is a definitive telling of the story and one that has gone down in history as a true classic, which is one of the big reasons it's considered to be greater than the book.

The film brought Hannibal to life in a way that Thomas Harris could only have imagined when he penned the story.

Movie had fans on the edge of their seat throughout, with an incredible amount of tension from start to finish. Jodie Foster and Anthony Hopkins were both excellent in their performances, and the fact it dominated the Academy Awards is a real showcase of how good the movie was.

In general, we know books are much more detailed than films. Film last approx. 2 hrs whilst a book can have hundreds of pages of description. In my opinion, the movie is among the most faithful adaptations ever written."

Considered greater by who?

It's certainly a good bit of work

but it does rather skew the focus of the original work.

Anthony Hopkins is not the only Hannibal it's unfortunate that Brian Cox's portrayal didn't get the acclaim it deserved in the earlier Red Dragon film

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *panksspankedMan
36 weeks ago

Edinburgh


"The rather factual Monty Python's Life Of Brian, loosly based on that fictional book The Bible "

You're a very naughty boy!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
36 weeks ago


"The Godfather parts 1 and 2"

Have to agree....book was good...but films took to another level

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
36 weeks ago

Oh and debbie does dallas....book was crap hahahaahah

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
36 weeks ago

The Agony & The Ecstasy

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
36 weeks ago


"Shawshank Redemption - Steven King"

Definitely !

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *agnar73Man
36 weeks ago

glasgow-ish


"Shawshank Redemption - Steven King

Definitely ! "

I’ll admit to not having read a lot of Steven King, but I guess through the movies I’ve see a few of his stories. Carrie and Misery I thinking?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *ablo minibar123Woman
36 weeks ago

.


"Jaws films I adore the book I struggled with as knew characters well from yrs watching favourite films and way dealt with events and situations were very different so felt like two separate views of same story.

The Meg books are different the films are fun popcorn yet the books are amazing and terrifying "

I never found the Meg books terrifying, but immensely enjoyable, and that's coming from someone who's not a big reader. The author is a fascinating guy.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top