FabSwingers.com forum: Male to female ratios

By *inkyropecouple OP Couple
37 weeks ago

carluke

Seen quite a few threads on this one where people have tried to estimate the ratios. Suddenly had a thought this morning about doing a little research by using the who’s near function. Interesting results!

Of the 68 profiles near us:

58 males

7 couples

2 TV/TS

1 female

Over 85% single males! I will be using this if I see any forum posts where men moan about not getting any meets

What’s it like in other areas?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
37 weeks ago

How do I find out?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod
37 weeks ago

East Sussex

That's only showing you who's got the who's near enabled. I'd guess women and couples don't use it as much as men

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ucka39Man
37 weeks ago

Newcastle

Hiya op

You also have to remember not everyone uses their location

and turns it off

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
37 weeks ago

300+ Men

185 FM couples

63 women

36 TV/TS

2 FF couples

7 MM couples

Within 10 miles and all ages. Not including the 50+ men on my block list

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *eroLondonMan
37 weeks ago

Mayfair

Surely it would be more inclusive/fair to see posts or threads by women who are moaning. Perhaps even couples. For the sake of variety.….….…?

Not everyone uses their location services on their device, and some men look further afield as opposed to their locale.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ubmissiveman2uMan
37 weeks ago

Cheshire

The ratio of Dominant women to submissive me is even worse they say 600 to 1

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *inkyropecouple OP Couple
37 weeks ago

carluke

"300+ Men

185 FM couples

63 women

36 TV/TS

2 FF couples

7 MM couples

Within 10 miles and all ages. Not including the 50+ men on my block list

A lot more people! And still shows a high percentage of single males

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
37 weeks ago

I'd guess there's a lot more single women than people think.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *inkyropecouple OP Couple
37 weeks ago

carluke

"Hiya op

You also have to remember not everyone uses their location

and turns it off"

Totally understand that not everyone uses their location, but as a “sample” of the fab population, it’s going to be indicative of the splits. Especially if more people do it for their area and the results are similar

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
37 weeks ago

"300+ Men

185 FM couples

63 women

36 TV/TS

2 FF couples

7 MM couples

Within 10 miles and all ages. Not including the 50+ men on my block list

A lot more people! And still shows a high percentage of single males "

So a 20 mile search. Men in my age range, non smokers, verified by meeting and can accommodate 300+

Women in same criteria ... 30

I can't possibly fuck that many men and neither do I want to

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *arryandhedgehogCouple
37 weeks ago

Thurrock

Did a proximity search within 5 miles was 54 men, 2 women, 4 couples and 4tv

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *TG3Man
37 weeks ago

Dorchester

"Seen quite a few threads on this one where people have tried to estimate the ratios. Suddenly had a thought this morning about doing a little research by using the who’s near function. Interesting results!

Of the 68 profiles near us:

58 males

7 couples

2 TV/TS

1 female

Over 85% single males! I will be using this if I see any forum posts where men moan about not getting any meets

What’s it like in other areas?

"
Just 2 females to 1 guy at the moment

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *untimes wantedMan
37 weeks ago

Huddersfield

[Removed by poster at 13/04/24 10:53:41]

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *untimes wantedMan
37 weeks ago

Huddersfield

Just did a search of online in last 10 hours with no filters.in a 5 mile search.

I used 10 hours because that was when the last man in search was logged on.

Man looking for woman 300.

Woman looking for man 35.

MF couple looking for man 25.

Tv/Ts looking for man 11

Man looking for man 70

Another search of online now. 10 mile radius no filters had to use 10 miles to find a woman online.

Man looking for woman 62

Woman looking for man 1

MF couple looking for man 8

Tv/Ts looking for man 5

Man looking for man 19

The above figures do not take into account Age ranges etc or interests.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
37 weeks ago

These figures tie in with what I've found too. Somewhere between 5 - 10 times more M than F, MF and TVs put together.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *istr3ssWoman
37 weeks ago

Stockton-on-Tees

More data for your research

Females - 4

Males - 56

Couples - 5

TV/TS - 2

MM couples - 2

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *istr3ssWoman
37 weeks ago

Stockton-on-Tees

"I'd guess there's a lot more single women than people think.

You're assuming all these women are single

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ophieslutTV/TS
37 weeks ago

Central

I had 40 men, 9 couples and a woman.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ealitybitesMan
37 weeks ago

Belfast

As others have said those are only the ratios of the profiles with who's near turned on.

A little like some of the socials I've gone to where it has been 60-70 percent single women.

Based on that alone it would suggest that single women outnumber everyone else so it's not really an accurate sample.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

Post new Message to Thread