FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Photoshopping the disabled away

Jump to newest
 

By *ebauchedDeviantsPt2 OP   Couple
41 weeks ago

Cumbria

From the BBC website:

“ A council has apologised after parents were offered a choice of class photos with or without children with complex needs in them.

Parents at Aboyne Primary complained after being sent a link from a photography company offering them alternative pictures.”

The school were not involved in the decision to offer pictures without disabled children in them, it was the photography company.

What say you, good people of the fora, is it acceptable to do this, do you get frustrated with disabled people being in photos, or do you think it’s unacceptable to delete the disabled?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *wist my nipplesCouple
41 weeks ago

North East Scotland, mostly

Tom?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *allySlinkyWoman
41 weeks ago

Leeds

Obviously it was an abhorrent suggestion and I think all schools should stop using Tempest Photography in protest.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *alandNitaCouple
41 weeks ago

Scunthorpe


"From the BBC website:

“ A council has apologised after parents were offered a choice of class photos with or without children with complex needs in them.

Parents at Aboyne Primary complained after being sent a link from a photography company offering them alternative pictures.”

The school were not involved in the decision to offer pictures without disabled children in them, it was the photography company.

What say you, good people of the fora, is it acceptable to do this, do you get frustrated with disabled people being in photos, or do you think it’s unacceptable to delete the disabled?"

Personally I think it is incredibly inappropriate for the photographers to make this type of decision, but also rather bizarre that it would cross their mind.

I do wonder if a parent had asked for the children in question to be removed for their pictures, and the company just offered the same option to others.

Either way, I think it's sick

Cal

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
41 weeks ago

Pretty disgusting.

I'm sure it was done with - all ther best intentions -

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *bi HaiveMan
Forum Mod

41 weeks ago

Cheeseville, Somerset

I'd be shoving a large zoom lens up the togs arse tbh.

Or a Sigma 105mm 1.4.

Those things have a very wide front element.........

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *allySlinkyWoman
41 weeks ago

Leeds

One mother says she now wonders how many parents ordered the version with her daughter removed.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eeliciouschaosWoman
41 weeks ago

Wherever

What about hidden disabilities? Seems like we as a society have a lot to learn and this honestly this makes me sick to my stomach.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ookie46Woman
41 weeks ago

Deepest darkest Peru

It’s just all wrong on so many levels

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *allySlinkyWoman
41 weeks ago

Leeds

A mother with twins in different classes says the photo offered of her able bodied daughter's class only had one picture available to purchase, yet the class photo of her wheelchair user daughter had two versions, one with her daughter deleted.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ags73Man
41 weeks ago

glasgow-ish


"One mother says she now wonders how many parents ordered the version with her daughter removed. "

I think that’s the point. A lot of talk about inclusion and maybe the kids understand it at school but don’t hear it at home.

Far as I understand all orders cancelled.

Tempest have did my kids schools and presumably they organise, do the online and payments and a local

Photographer does the work as and when, but their reputation will take an absolute battering and deservedly

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
41 weeks ago


"What about hidden disabilities? Seems like we as a society have a lot to learn and this honestly this makes me sick to my stomach."

Ahh it's ok as long as you look normal, or close enough.

The level of "you dont look disabled" ignorance is large.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iking_WitchWoman
41 weeks ago

Hinckley

We all know what the answer is. But we live in a world where the eradication and exclusion of people is normal, accepted and practiced.

It's true we see more disabled and differently abled people on TV, screen and stage but there is still the beauty bias that applies.

When faced with real people I think people still try to hide away people with disabilities.

It's like the workplace. They think they are being inclusive by accepting someone with a walking aid but don't realise the whole of IT and systems has been run by Neuro spicies for decades and the women in credit control are battling Fibro and CFS and are very direct and assertive because they have to fight to survive daily through their disabilities.

We have a culture of ignoring or hiding us away.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eeliciouschaosWoman
41 weeks ago

Wherever


"What about hidden disabilities? Seems like we as a society have a lot to learn and this honestly this makes me sick to my stomach.

Ahh it's ok as long as you look normal, or close enough.

The level of "you dont look disabled" ignorance is large.

"

This unfortunately has been a common occurrence since my my daughter was born. It needs to be added, the largest part of it was by so called “professionals”.

(It needs to be also added there are some absolutely amazing professionals out there for the counterbalance.)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *allySlinkyWoman
41 weeks ago

Leeds

Another photograph is in the news today. A prestigious Press Photo of the Year has been won by a photo of 5 Hamas terrorists with the naked and brutalised body of a woman in their truck.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ags73Man
41 weeks ago

glasgow-ish


"What about hidden disabilities? Seems like we as a society have a lot to learn and this honestly this makes me sick to my stomach.

Ahh it's ok as long as you look normal, or close enough.

The level of "you dont look disabled" ignorance is large.

"

That’s another whole issue with public knowledge and whether it’s meant as a kindness or not, it’s very much out there.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atnip make me purrWoman
41 weeks ago

Reading

I hope the publicity closes the photography place. Abhorrent suggestion.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
41 weeks ago


"

This unfortunately has been a common occurrence since my my daughter was born. It needs to be added, the largest part of it was by so called “professionals”.

(It needs to be also added there are some absolutely amazing professionals out there for the counterbalance.)"

I can empthise with you there from thr same experince. You have to fight so hard to get the help and acceptance they qualify for and deserve.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

41 weeks ago

East Sussex

What's the story behind this I wonder

I don't hope the photography company gets closed down because people will lose livelihoods but 'on the face of it' some retraining needs to happen at the very least accompanied by a very public apology.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ags73Man
41 weeks ago

glasgow-ish


"What's the story behind this I wonder

I don't hope the photography company gets closed down because people will lose livelihoods but 'on the face of it' some retraining needs to happen at the very least accompanied by a very public apology."

Depends on what went out on order sheets and to what stage school stepped in to stop it

I think tempest use their resource on web for orders and the photographer is a local freelancer so maybe as company name known and photographers isn’t, it’s slightly unfair.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *allySlinkyWoman
41 weeks ago

Leeds


" some retraining needs to happen at the very least accompanied by a very public apology."

The photographer's explanation to the school was "some children take time to get focussed"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eeliciouschaosWoman
41 weeks ago

Wherever


" some retraining needs to happen at the very least accompanied by a very public apology.

The photographer's explanation to the school was "some children take time to get focussed""

For real though

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

41 weeks ago

East Sussex


" some retraining needs to happen at the very least accompanied by a very public apology.

The photographer's explanation to the school was "some children take time to get focussed""

Well that's quite true if any group of young kids. I don't think it's a reason to Photoshop them out of photos

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *emorefridaCouple
41 weeks ago

La la land


" some retraining needs to happen at the very least accompanied by a very public apology.

The photographer's explanation to the school was "some children take time to get focussed""

That may well be, but surely that means they can add a child to a photo if they were blurry not remove them.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
41 weeks ago

That is absolute bullshit from whoever came up with the idea.

The people that could be removed out of that photo are somebody’s actual friend.

Nice. Ffs.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ools and the brainCouple
41 weeks ago

couple, us we him her.

Well I personally don't want a picture of other people's children so just a picture of my daughter or son alone thanks.

I'm sure that in this era of fakery and vanity someone somewhere is offering to Photoshop their children's appearances and guaranteed some parents will accept

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inky_couple2020Couple
41 weeks ago

North West

Today I've also read about a wheelchair user who was refused service and asked to leave KFC in Lagos airport, just because he was a wheelchair user (the restaurant was accessible, he had eaten there before).

On Insta, I've read about disabled children excluded from school trips and these overnight "PGL" things.

Lots of exclusion.

This is a particularly egregious example of discrimination though. It's a really active, deliberate form of discrimination and it's abhorrent. It wouldn't surprise me if other parents in the class had requested it, rather than the photography company suggesting it. Do we remember the outcry from some parents when Cbeebies had a presenter who had one arm?? Some parents complained it would "frighten their children" and that Cerrie Burnell shouldn't be on the TV.

It's a lovely place, this earth

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inky_couple2020Couple
41 weeks ago

North West


"Well I personally don't want a picture of other people's children so just a picture of my daughter or son alone thanks.

I'm sure that in this era of fakery and vanity someone somewhere is offering to Photoshop their children's appearances and guaranteed some parents will accept "

It was the "whole class" photo. Schools usually do individual ones plus a class one. Parents have the choice of what, if anything, to buy.

We rarely buy photos from school because it costs £40 just to do a digital download!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *jorkishMan
41 weeks ago

Seaforth

Disgraceful

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
41 weeks ago

in Lancashire

Shitty and inappropriate behaviour..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ools and the brainCouple
41 weeks ago

couple, us we him her.


"Well I personally don't want a picture of other people's children so just a picture of my daughter or son alone thanks.

I'm sure that in this era of fakery and vanity someone somewhere is offering to Photoshop their children's appearances and guaranteed some parents will accept

It was the "whole class" photo. Schools usually do individual ones plus a class one. Parents have the choice of what, if anything, to buy.

We rarely buy photos from school because it costs £40 just to do a digital download!! "

Yeah I realise that, we never wanted a whole class photo and yes I agree with what you said it was probably parents asking for the service and the company offered it to everyone as a result.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ellhungvweMan
41 weeks ago

Cheltenham


"Well I personally don't want a picture of other people's children so just a picture of my daughter or son alone thanks.

I'm sure that in this era of fakery and vanity someone somewhere is offering to Photoshop their children's appearances and guaranteed some parents will accept

It was the "whole class" photo. Schools usually do individual ones plus a class one. Parents have the choice of what, if anything, to buy.

We rarely buy photos from school because it costs £40 just to do a digital download!!

Yeah I realise that, we never wanted a whole class photo and yes I agree with what you said it was probably parents asking for the service and the company offered it to everyone as a result."

I would have thought the correct answer to the parents who asked was: “Sorry, we don’t discriminate.”

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ools and the brainCouple
41 weeks ago

couple, us we him her.


"Well I personally don't want a picture of other people's children so just a picture of my daughter or son alone thanks.

I'm sure that in this era of fakery and vanity someone somewhere is offering to Photoshop their children's appearances and guaranteed some parents will accept

It was the "whole class" photo. Schools usually do individual ones plus a class one. Parents have the choice of what, if anything, to buy.

We rarely buy photos from school because it costs £40 just to do a digital download!!

Yeah I realise that, we never wanted a whole class photo and yes I agree with what you said it was probably parents asking for the service and the company offered it to everyone as a result.

I would have thought the correct answer to the parents who asked was: “Sorry, we don’t discriminate.”"

You would have hoped but clearly not

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uddy laneMan
41 weeks ago

dudley


"From the BBC website:

“ A council has apologised after parents were offered a choice of class photos with or without children with complex needs in them.

Parents at Aboyne Primary complained after being sent a link from a photography company offering them alternative pictures.”

The school were not involved in the decision to offer pictures without disabled children in them, it was the photography company.

What say you, good people of the fora, is it acceptable to do this, do you get frustrated with disabled people being in photos, or do you think it’s unacceptable to delete the disabled?"

That shows the character of those people and the hatred they have for fellow humans.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ebauchedDeviantsPt2 OP   Couple
41 weeks ago

Cumbria


"Well I personally don't want a picture of other people's children so just a picture of my daughter or son alone thanks.

I'm sure that in this era of fakery and vanity someone somewhere is offering to Photoshop their children's appearances and guaranteed some parents will accept

It was the "whole class" photo. Schools usually do individual ones plus a class one. Parents have the choice of what, if anything, to buy.

We rarely buy photos from school because it costs £40 just to do a digital download!!

Yeah I realise that, we never wanted a whole class photo and yes I agree with what you said it was probably parents asking for the service and the company offered it to everyone as a result.

I would have thought the correct answer to the parents who asked was: “Sorry, we don’t discriminate.”

You would have hoped but clearly not "

Yep, just because there is a market for it, doesn’t mean it should be catered to.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
41 weeks ago

Manchester (she/her)


" some retraining needs to happen at the very least accompanied by a very public apology.

The photographer's explanation to the school was "some children take time to get focussed""

My first school picture, there were several children poking their tongues out at other children.

We weren't disabled though, so that's the picture we fucking got. Fuck me what is this world coming to.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
41 weeks ago

Central

I feel sick just contemplating that anyone would even think of this. How sad that some are viewed as disposable

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *agneto.Man
41 weeks ago

Bham

Wow. Shocking.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *allySlinkyWoman
41 weeks ago

Leeds


" it was probably parents asking for the service and the company offered it to everyone as a result."

Including the parents of the three deleted children.

The company should have obviously declined.

Where do you draw the line ? E.G. Could you remove the tall kid because he makes my son look small ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ebauchedDeviantsPt2 OP   Couple
41 weeks ago

Cumbria


"I feel sick just contemplating that anyone would even think of this. How sad that some are viewed as disposable "

I think we saw during COVID how many people saw disabled people as disposable.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *r Cheeky cheekyMan
41 weeks ago

essex


"What about hidden disabilities? Seems like we as a society have a lot to learn and this honestly this makes me sick to my stomach."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *r Cheeky cheekyMan
41 weeks ago

essex


"What about hidden disabilities? Seems like we as a society have a lot to learn and this honestly this makes me sick to my stomach."

Your 100% right

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *r Cheeky cheekyMan
41 weeks ago

essex


"It’s just all wrong on so many levels "

True

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *r Cheeky cheekyMan
41 weeks ago

essex


"It’s just all wrong on so many levels "

True

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
41 weeks ago

Happens all the time sadly.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-68692977

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *r MzchiefMan
41 weeks ago

Derbyshire


"From the BBC website:

“ A council has apologised after parents were offered a choice of class photos with or without children with complex needs in them.

Parents at Aboyne Primary complained after being sent a link from a photography company offering them alternative pictures.”

The school were not involved in the decision to offer pictures without disabled children in them, it was the photography company.

What say you, good people of the fora, is it acceptable to do this, do you get frustrated with disabled people being in photos, or do you think it’s unacceptable to delete the disabled?"

As a parent of a neuro diverse child i find that notion abhorent. If any parents took up that offer they need to take a long hard look at tbemselves. The school and council need to distance themselves from that company.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inky_couple2020Couple
41 weeks ago

North West


"Happens all the time sadly.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-68692977"

Access to leisure activities for disabled people is woeful. As a wheelchair using parent, I've been unable to get into all sorts of leisure venues where kids parties are being held. On some occasions, I've had to send my daughter in with her classmates and just sit in the car outside while everyone else has a coffee inside. Any disabled child would be equally unable to participate. It's not a nice feeling.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *inger_SnapWoman
41 weeks ago

Hampshire/Dorset

Wtaf...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top