FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Unsolicited videos

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
34 weeks ago

If someone sent you an unsolicited wank video of the back of a totally unrelated forum post, how would you react ? Is reporting such a thing overreacting? I don't appreciate the gamut of cock picks but now it's a live one I like it even less ! I've blocked and yes I reported ! Am I being a prude lol. !

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *eacupsbearCouple
34 weeks ago

York

No.

Simple answer.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago

Nope your not being prude anything unwanted isn’t being prude you didn’t ask for that the person should have known better

Also hugs you had to go through that just wished people would think more before sending messages

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
34 weeks ago


"Nope your not being prude anything unwanted isn’t being prude you didn’t ask for that the person should have known better

Also hugs you had to go through that just wished people would think more before sending messages "

Ahhh hugs are always welcome. X

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago


"Nope your not being prude anything unwanted isn’t being prude you didn’t ask for that the person should have known better

Also hugs you had to go through that just wished people would think more before sending messages

Ahhh hugs are always welcome. X"

Your welcome anytime

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nightsoftheCoffeeTableCouple
34 weeks ago

Leeds

You aren't being a prude & you aren't over reacting, some people are just pricks and don't understand consent.

Aside from it being illegal some on here think everyone and anyone wants to see their cock and it's just not the case.

Report the creeps.

Mrs

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *mmaleiaWoman
34 weeks ago

East Northamptonshire


"If someone sent you an unsolicited wank video of the back of a totally unrelated forum post, how would you react ? Is reporting such a thing overreacting? I don't appreciate the gamut of cock picks but now it's a live one I like it even less ! I've blocked and yes I reported ! Am I being a prude lol. ! "
probably got the same video from the same guy, I just blocked, I found reporting things here led nowhere

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago

Did you watch it?

Report it and see what happens! I’ve had unsolicited pictures (not videos) and I’ve just deleted them and got on with my life.

Like people always pointed out on here, a message in your inbox is just junk mail

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ymAndIcedCoffeeWoman
34 weeks ago

Worcester


"Did you watch it?

Report it and see what happens! I’ve had unsolicited pictures (not videos) and I’ve just deleted them and got on with my life.

Like people always pointed out on here, a message in your inbox is just junk mail "

Yeah and a guy showing you his penis in the street is just a friendly greeting, right?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago


"Did you watch it?

Report it and see what happens! I’ve had unsolicited pictures (not videos) and I’ve just deleted them and got on with my life.

Like people always pointed out on here, a message in your inbox is just junk mail

Yeah and a guy showing you his penis in the street is just a friendly greeting, right?

"

No. Because that’s in the street

And I didn’t say it was alright, or a friendly greeting in here either.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *unchalMan
34 weeks ago

Dartford


"If someone sent you an unsolicited wank video of the back of a totally unrelated forum post, how would you react ? Is reporting such a thing overreacting? I don't appreciate the gamut of cock picks but now it's a live one I like it even less ! I've blocked and yes I reported ! Am I being a prude lol. ! "

Yeah, you probably are over reacting a little bit, given this is a site largely dedicated to having sex with strangers, regardless of all the talk of connections.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *UGGYBEAR2015Man
34 weeks ago

BRIDPORT

I don’t think it has anything to do with prudishness, you have received something you find distasteful that you didn’t ask for and have reacted to ensure it isn’t repeated. There’s not much else you can do.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago

People forget this is a public forum. Lots of people message off the back of what someone has posted.

It's also a public forum on a adult content site.

So no, I wouldn't be outraged or offended. I'd probably watch it snigger a little, delete and get on with my life.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ymAndIcedCoffeeWoman
34 weeks ago

Worcester


"Did you watch it?

Report it and see what happens! I’ve had unsolicited pictures (not videos) and I’ve just deleted them and got on with my life.

Like people always pointed out on here, a message in your inbox is just junk mail

Yeah and a guy showing you his penis in the street is just a friendly greeting, right?

No. Because that’s in the street

And I didn’t say it was alright, or a friendly greeting in here either.

"

But it’s not “just junk mail” and more than a guy putting Polaroids of his penis through your letterbox is “just junk mail.”

We should all start reporting these graphic unwanted images. Strangely the thread I started suggesting people do that got removed by admin.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago

Don't think it is prudish at all honestly. We specifically ask on our profile to not be sent pictures or videos of dicks and we report them all when they do regardless.

Can't control what people put as their profile picture but your inbox is yours.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago


"Did you watch it?

Report it and see what happens! I’ve had unsolicited pictures (not videos) and I’ve just deleted them and got on with my life.

Like people always pointed out on here, a message in your inbox is just junk mail

Yeah and a guy showing you his penis in the street is just a friendly greeting, right?

No. Because that’s in the street

And I didn’t say it was alright, or a friendly greeting in here either.

But it’s not “just junk mail” and more than a guy putting Polaroids of his penis through your letterbox is “just junk mail.”

We should all start reporting these graphic unwanted images. Strangely the thread I started suggesting people do that got removed by admin."

Look. Here is my view.

If I was on a knitting, I would expect my junk mail would be other people showing me what knitted , a jumper, gloves, et cetera. Maybe even somebody trying to sell me new yarn.

But I’m on a sex website, where peoples avatars a cock pics and vaginas and gaping arseholes.

So I would expect my junk mail to be something similar.

So I refer to it a junk mail whether it’s right or wrong to send a dick pic or tits into somebody’s inbox, is subjective. Because I know some people on here are here for that.

Don’t try to twist it to say I’m (or others) are alright with it, or I do it.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ymAndIcedCoffeeWoman
34 weeks ago

Worcester


"Did you watch it?

Report it and see what happens! I’ve had unsolicited pictures (not videos) and I’ve just deleted them and got on with my life.

Like people always pointed out on here, a message in your inbox is just junk mail

Yeah and a guy showing you his penis in the street is just a friendly greeting, right?

No. Because that’s in the street

And I didn’t say it was alright, or a friendly greeting in here either.

But it’s not “just junk mail” and more than a guy putting Polaroids of his penis through your letterbox is “just junk mail.”

We should all start reporting these graphic unwanted images. Strangely the thread I started suggesting people do that got removed by admin.

Look. Here is my view.

If I was on a knitting, I would expect my junk mail would be other people showing me what knitted , a jumper, gloves, et cetera. Maybe even somebody trying to sell me new yarn.

But I’m on a sex website, where peoples avatars a cock pics and vaginas and gaping arseholes.

So I would expect my junk mail to be something similar.

So I refer to it a junk mail whether it’s right or wrong to send a dick pic or tits into somebody’s inbox, is subjective. Because I know some people on here are here for that.

Don’t try to twist it to say I’m (or others) are alright with it, or I do it. "

The thing is, every time that I post on the forums about how we should report these messages or that it’s just wrong to send them, I get messages from male people, that are bordering on abusive, about how basically I shouldn’t be on a swing site if I can’t cope with men sending images of their genitals to my *private* inbox.

And every time a guy on the forums is like “meh just delete it” although he’s saying it with good intentions, what these abusive guys are hearing is “these men all support me and I am in the right for feeling entitled to enter women’s *private* inboxes with pictures of my genitals.”

It’s like when you’re in the pub and one of the lads tells a sexist joke. If everyone just stays silent he doesn’t think he’s wrong. It’s the bystander effect and it gives him the confidence to do it again. If everyone around him (especially fellow men) said “actually mate, that’s not ok” we might actually make some progress.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *unchalMan
34 weeks ago

Dartford


"People forget this is a public forum. Lots of people message off the back of what someone has posted.

It's also a public forum on a adult content site.

So no, I wouldn't be outraged or offended. I'd probably watch it snigger a little, delete and get on with my life.

"

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ymAndIcedCoffeeWoman
34 weeks ago

Worcester

Maybe I’m just irritated because literally two minutes posting the response above a male person was all up on my inbox telling me why I should accept graphic pictures of penises in my inbox with good grace, and why having a clothes bum picture as my profile pic also makes me as bad as the men I don’t like. Or something.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nightsoftheCoffeeTableCouple
34 weeks ago

Leeds


"If someone sent you an unsolicited wank video of the back of a totally unrelated forum post, how would you react ? Is reporting such a thing overreacting? I don't appreciate the gamut of cock picks but now it's a live one I like it even less ! I've blocked and yes I reported ! Am I being a prude lol. !

Yeah, you probably are over reacting a little bit, given this is a site largely dedicated to having sex with strangers, regardless of all the talk of connections. "

This site is a swingers site and with all sexual activity in real life or online consent is key.

We shouldn't expect people to take away that consent because we are on here.

Rather than blame the people who don't like it, blame the pricks sending their cock to anyone and everyone who'll look, they are the issue.

Mrs

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago


"Did you watch it?

Report it and see what happens! I’ve had unsolicited pictures (not videos) and I’ve just deleted them and got on with my life.

Like people always pointed out on here, a message in your inbox is just junk mail

Yeah and a guy showing you his penis in the street is just a friendly greeting, right?

No. Because that’s in the street

And I didn’t say it was alright, or a friendly greeting in here either.

But it’s not “just junk mail” and more than a guy putting Polaroids of his penis through your letterbox is “just junk mail.”

We should all start reporting these graphic unwanted images. Strangely the thread I started suggesting people do that got removed by admin.

Look. Here is my view.

If I was on a knitting, I would expect my junk mail would be other people showing me what knitted , a jumper, gloves, et cetera. Maybe even somebody trying to sell me new yarn.

But I’m on a sex website, where peoples avatars a cock pics and vaginas and gaping arseholes.

So I would expect my junk mail to be something similar.

So I refer to it a junk mail whether it’s right or wrong to send a dick pic or tits into somebody’s inbox, is subjective. Because I know some people on here are here for that.

Don’t try to twist it to say I’m (or others) are alright with it, or I do it.

The thing is, every time that I post on the forums about how we should report these messages or that it’s just wrong to send them, I get messages from male people, that are bordering on abusive, about how basically I shouldn’t be on a swing site if I can’t cope with men sending images of their genitals to my *private* inbox.

And every time a guy on the forums is like “meh just delete it” although he’s saying it with good intentions, what these abusive guys are hearing is “these men all support me and I am in the right for feeling entitled to enter women’s *private* inboxes with pictures of my genitals.”

It’s like when you’re in the pub and one of the lads tells a sexist joke. If everyone just stays silent he doesn’t think he’s wrong. It’s the bystander effect and it gives him the confidence to do it again. If everyone around him (especially fellow men) said “actually mate, that’s not ok” we might actually make some progress."

I don't have a penis, I swear.

But I'm also fully aware of where I am and I know the kind of things men will send. And yeah, that's never gonna change.

I don't think anyone is saying it's fine, but jeez if I was so offended at seeing a penis I'd do something about it. Block men, hide images, look at my phone behind my fingers etc.

Also, you cannot compare fab to getting images in everyday life.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago


"….

We should all start reporting these graphic unwanted images. Strangely the thread I started suggesting people do that got removed by admin.

Look. Here is my view.

If I was on a knitting, I would expect my junk mail would be other people showing me what knitted , a jumper, gloves, et cetera. Maybe even somebody trying to sell me new yarn.

But I’m on a sex website, where peoples avatars a cock pics and vaginas and gaping arseholes.

So I would expect my junk mail to be something similar.

So I refer to it a junk mail whether it’s right or wrong to send a dick pic or tits into somebody’s inbox, is subjective. Because I know some people on here are here for that.

Don’t try to twist it to say I’m (or others) are alright with it, or I do it.

The thing is, every time that I post on the forums about how we should report these messages or that it’s just wrong to send them, I get messages from male people, that are bordering on abusive, about how basically I shouldn’t be on a swing site if I can’t cope with men sending images of their genitals to my *private* inbox.

And every time a guy on the forums is like “meh just delete it” although he’s saying it with good intentions, what these abusive guys are hearing is “these men all support me and I am in the right for feeling entitled to enter women’s *private* inboxes with pictures of my genitals.”

It’s like when you’re in the pub and one of the lads tells a sexist joke. If everyone just stays silent he doesn’t think he’s wrong. It’s the bystander effect and it gives him the confidence to do it again. If everyone around him (especially fellow men) said “actually mate, that’s not ok” we might actually make some progress."

I actually support the view of a detailed profile.

NO DICK PICS. (you shouldn’t have to put it, but here we are)

I support people reading profiles… again, but here we are.

The best you can do is continue to report, receiving things you don’t like and I agree with anyone doing that, because then the people who run the website might do something about it.

But I don’t think it’s on the list of their priorities, considering it is a website that allows you on your profile to put these type of pictures and videos for people to view them publicly.

Also, going back to your jokes amongst friends, I know my audience, and I think we all do, and we tell jokes to our friends which we wouldn’t tell to strangers. But I have common sense., and a lot of people on public forums, and Fab don’t, and they are the ones that find themselves the subject of a thread, where the original post has pointed out, they received a DM they are not happy with from someone - An unsolicited explicit video.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
34 weeks ago


"People forget this is a public forum. Lots of people message off the back of what someone has posted.

It's also a public forum on a adult content site.

So no, I wouldn't be outraged or offended. I'd probably watch it snigger a little, delete and get on with my life.

"

I didn't say I was outraged !

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ackformore100Man
34 weeks ago

Tin town

I went to the supermarket the other day. Imagine how browned off I was when there were rows upon rows of things to buy. I'm going again this week. I hope there's nothing in there to buy or I'll be right dischuffed.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ulieAndBeefCouple
34 weeks ago

Manchester-ish


"Did you watch it?

Report it and see what happens! I’ve had unsolicited pictures (not videos) and I’ve just deleted them and got on with my life.

Like people always pointed out on here, a message in your inbox is just junk mail

Yeah and a guy showing you his penis in the street is just a friendly greeting, right?

No. Because that’s in the street

And I didn’t say it was alright, or a friendly greeting in here either.

But it’s not “just junk mail” and more than a guy putting Polaroids of his penis through your letterbox is “just junk mail.”

We should all start reporting these graphic unwanted images. Strangely the thread I started suggesting people do that got removed by admin.

Look. Here is my view.

If I was on a knitting, I would expect my junk mail would be other people showing me what knitted , a jumper, gloves, et cetera. Maybe even somebody trying to sell me new yarn.

But I’m on a sex website, where peoples avatars a cock pics and vaginas and gaping arseholes.

So I would expect my junk mail to be something similar.

So I refer to it a junk mail whether it’s right or wrong to send a dick pic or tits into somebody’s inbox, is subjective. Because I know some people on here are here for that.

Don’t try to twist it to say I’m (or others) are alright with it, or I do it.

The thing is, every time that I post on the forums about how we should report these messages or that it’s just wrong to send them, I get messages from male people, that are bordering on abusive, about how basically I shouldn’t be on a swing site if I can’t cope with men sending images of their genitals to my *private* inbox.

And every time a guy on the forums is like “meh just delete it” although he’s saying it with good intentions, what these abusive guys are hearing is “these men all support me and I am in the right for feeling entitled to enter women’s *private* inboxes with pictures of my genitals.”

It’s like when you’re in the pub and one of the lads tells a sexist joke. If everyone just stays silent he doesn’t think he’s wrong. It’s the bystander effect and it gives him the confidence to do it again. If everyone around him (especially fellow men) said “actually mate, that’s not ok” we might actually make some progress."

This. Well said.

J

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago

No.... You're not being a prude at all OP. Its not a nice experience at all most of the time when a cock is shoved in our faces virtually & unexpectedly from a total stranger ....

But unfortunately on some sites & here too it's very common for that to happen....Cyber Flashing is rife....

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago

Turn the option to view images on the website off.

Problem solved.

That way you won’t view all the avatars of people showing their bits off if it’s not what you like to see you on here .

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
34 weeks ago

Just to clarify as it seems things have escalated! I expect cock shots attached to most messages. I know it goes with the territory and I've always accepted that as yes this is a sex site. What I injected to was a video of some random knocking one out. I'm a big girl and this isn't my first rodeo. I wasn't looking for sympathy I was interested in finding out peoples opinions ! Its been interesting reading everyone's view points and coming to the conclusion that misogyny is still alive and well.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago

We shouldn't have to just accept that we will receive these pics and videos. Doesn't matter that's its a swinging site.

Men should respect the fact that if we want to see, we will ask

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ackformore100Man
34 weeks ago

Tin town


"Just to clarify as it seems things have escalated! I expect cock shots attached to most messages. I know it goes with the territory and I've always accepted that as yes this is a sex site. What I injected to was a video of some random knocking one out. I'm a big girl and this isn't my first rodeo. I wasn't looking for sympathy I was interested in finding out peoples opinions ! Its been interesting reading everyone's view points and coming to the conclusion that misogyny is still alive and well. "

I don't believe it's being a misogynist to suggest if you don't like the content, block it, or don't join a site where it's very well known to be mostly men, some of whom are offensive twats. It's a free site and will attract all sorts. That's not to say its ok. It isn't ok. It's just being surprised or offended by it... There are ways to protect yourself from it very easily.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago


"We shouldn't have to just accept that we will receive these pics and videos. Doesn't matter that's its a swinging site.

Men should respect the fact that if we want to see, we will ask"

Yes if we want to see it we'll ask ....or they can just ask if we want a dick pic....most dick pics are so up close too & quite graphic..with absolutely no idea of the body type or whatever

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago


"We shouldn't have to just accept that we will receive these pics and videos. Doesn't matter that's its a swinging site.

Men should respect the fact that if we want to see, we will ask

Yes if we want to see it we'll ask ....or they can just ask if we want a dick pic....most dick pics are so up close too & quite graphic..with absolutely no idea of the body type or whatever "

And that’s exactly how it should be.

I’ve got myself into an argument above because I support that exact view, and also have a different way of reacting.

To the op. It’s was a good question on Fab.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ex HolesMan
34 weeks ago

Up North

I’d love some unsolicited videos please

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nightsoftheCoffeeTableCouple
34 weeks ago

Leeds


"We shouldn't have to just accept that we will receive these pics and videos. Doesn't matter that's its a swinging site.

Men should respect the fact that if we want to see, we will ask"

Exactly this! If men don't take consent seriously they shouldn't be here.

The oh it's ok because it's a swingers site is a load of bollocks, being a swingers site doesn't take away the need for consent nor does it make grown men that act like pricks ok.

Mrs

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *tlanshiaWoman
34 weeks ago

Chatham

Reporting isn't an over reaction. Tbh, and the people who say it's a sex site what do you expect are no better than those who blame a woman's outfit.

Consent is consent. And asking if someone wants to see or do something sexual should be the normal.

Sorry you've experienced that.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago


"I went to the supermarket the other day. Imagine how browned off I was when there were rows upon rows of things to buy. I'm going again this week. I hope there's nothing in there to buy or I'll be right dischuffed. "

Totally stupid comparison in my opinion.

We go to a supermarket and look for what we want, its not just thrown in our trolley by other people. We ask if we cant see what we want.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nightsoftheCoffeeTableCouple
34 weeks ago

Leeds


"I went to the supermarket the other day. Imagine how browned off I was when there were rows upon rows of things to buy. I'm going again this week. I hope there's nothing in there to buy or I'll be right dischuffed. "

So if I throw my shopping into your basket that's ok is it, regardless if you want it or not.

What a ridiculous comparison.

Mrs

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago


"I went to the supermarket the other day. Imagine how browned off I was when there were rows upon rows of things to buy. I'm going again this week. I hope there's nothing in there to buy or I'll be right dischuffed.

So if I throw my shopping into your basket that's ok is it, regardless if you want it or not.

What a ridiculous comparison.

Mrs "

You can throw rum into my basket, or coffee. Thank you…

^consent.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *xfordjohnMan
34 weeks ago

Oxford


"If someone sent you an unsolicited wank video of the back of a totally unrelated forum post, how would you react ? Is reporting such a thing overreacting? I don't appreciate the gamut of cock picks but now it's a live one I like it even less ! I've blocked and yes I reported ! Am I being a prude lol. ! "

No. You are absolutely within your rights to object strongly to such behaviour. And the more who do object, maybe some men will grow up.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago


"I went to the supermarket the other day. Imagine how browned off I was when there were rows upon rows of things to buy. I'm going again this week. I hope there's nothing in there to buy or I'll be right dischuffed.

So if I throw my shopping into your basket that's ok is it, regardless if you want it or not.

What a ridiculous comparison.

Mrs "

It is a bad comparison.

Though if I went shopping with my tits out in an adult only grocery store (oooh there's an idea) I'd kinda expect to see a few penises. Or maybe hope.

And also, I wouldn't complain if they put said penis in my basket if it was pretty and from a hot guy. But there we go!

Also, hot wedding pics!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago


"I went to the supermarket the other day. Imagine how browned off I was when there were rows upon rows of things to buy. I'm going again this week. I hope there's nothing in there to buy or I'll be right dischuffed.

So if I throw my shopping into your basket that's ok is it, regardless if you want it or not.

What a ridiculous comparison.

Mrs

You can throw rum into my basket, or coffee. Thank you…

^consent. "

Lol....sure while you're at it you can throw a few bottles of Merlot & Malbec into mine & a few strip-loin steaks

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *r X46Man
34 weeks ago

Liverpool

I often wonder just how long after email was invented did someone send a dick pic.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *imisugarWoman
34 weeks ago

Rugby

I find threads like this very revealing and welcome them.

Agree with many, the inbox isn't the public part of the site and you're allowed to feel irritated someone has sent you unwanted content.

The replies advising to ignore it, get over it or should expect it on here demonstrate to me the understanding of consent for some is a challenging prospect.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *rcoupleCouple
34 weeks ago

Mid Glam

No you are not.

Report and block them. Liking sex isnt an open invite for anyones and everyone's poorly photo'd extreme close up cock shot being sent you you.

It's bad enough 1st or 2nd picture in a profile.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ris GrayMan
34 weeks ago

Dorchester


"If someone sent you an unsolicited wank video of the back of a totally unrelated forum post, how would you react ? Is reporting such a thing overreacting? I don't appreciate the gamut of cock picks but now it's a live one I like it even less ! I've blocked and yes I reported ! Am I being a prude lol. ! "
Some would say you are and a few here would have you imprison him, I'd say put it on your profile that you dont want penis pics or wank vids then leave it to admin to decide their fate

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ustBoWoman
34 weeks ago

Somewhere in Co. Down

You are not a prude because you don't want that in the inbox from some random guy.

If it was me I wouldn't even have opened the video I would have just deleted the whole message and left a note on their profile. And deleted anything else they send in future,if they persisted in sending messages then I would block. You decided to report and block and that is a perfectly okay thing to do as well.

I don't actually get why grown adults think that sending people explicit pics when they don't know someone is going to turn them on and make they want to react well to them. It seems pathetic and immature and a complete lack of understanding of how to interact with people. And yes even given the site we are on it just makes me roll my eyes and think what a gobshite as I delete the message.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nightsoftheCoffeeTableCouple
34 weeks ago

Leeds


"I went to the supermarket the other day. Imagine how browned off I was when there were rows upon rows of things to buy. I'm going again this week. I hope there's nothing in there to buy or I'll be right dischuffed.

So if I throw my shopping into your basket that's ok is it, regardless if you want it or not.

What a ridiculous comparison.

Mrs

It is a bad comparison.

Though if I went shopping with my tits out in an adult only grocery store (oooh there's an idea) I'd kinda expect to see a few penises. Or maybe hope.

And also, I wouldn't complain if they put said penis in my basket if it was pretty and from a hot guy. But there we go!

Also, hot wedding pics!

"

Thanks had to have an alternative wedding album.

I expect to see explicit pics of course I do, I choose to look.

I don't expect adults to send unsolicited pics/vids like it's normal removing any consent regardless of the site.

Mrs

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *izandpaulCouple
34 weeks ago

merseyside

I just view, giggle, shake my head, delete or show Paul and then delete.

It doesn't bother me at all.

If it causes offence then report or leave site or ask others opinion.

Whatever makes you happy.

Liz x

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago


"I went to the supermarket the other day. Imagine how browned off I was when there were rows upon rows of things to buy. I'm going again this week. I hope there's nothing in there to buy or I'll be right dischuffed.

So if I throw my shopping into your basket that's ok is it, regardless if you want it or not.

What a ridiculous comparison.

Mrs

It is a bad comparison.

Though if I went shopping with my tits out in an adult only grocery store (oooh there's an idea) I'd kinda expect to see a few penises. Or maybe hope.

And also, I wouldn't complain if they put said penis in my basket if it was pretty and from a hot guy. But there we go!

Also, hot wedding pics!

Thanks had to have an alternative wedding album.

I expect to see explicit pics of course I do, I choose to look.

I don't expect adults to send unsolicited pics/vids like it's normal removing any consent regardless of the site.

Mrs "

Somebody mentioned to me

tacit consent

Noun. tacit consent - (law) tacit approval of someone's wrongdoing

And I’m read into it, and see whether I agree I don’t agree with this.

If I actually being on here, we are already consent to this type of thing.

I’m 50/50 with the argument, but still hundred percent that we should always ask first.

“Can I please put my pretty penis into your basket?”

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago


"….

I don't expect adults to send unsolicited pics/vids like it's normal removing any consent regardless of the site.

Mrs

Somebody mentioned to me

tacit consent

Noun. tacit consent - (law) tacit approval of someone's wrongdoing

And I’m read into it, and see whether I agree I don’t agree with this.

If I actually being on here, we are already consent to this type of thing.

I’m 50/50 with the argument, but still hundred percent that we should always ask first.

“Can I please put my pretty penis into your basket?”

"

Sorry. “Inbox!”

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *rispyDuckMan
34 weeks ago

Chinese Takeaway near you

To fully understand your perspective: I think some ladies should send me unsolicited videos of them wanking

Maybe with a shared experience I can relate better and give in-depth advise.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ora the explorerWoman
34 weeks ago

Paradise, Herts

I don’t appreciate cock pics either. I haven’t had videos. But I just wouldn’t open it.

If something has an attachment I can usually tell by the first line of the message or looking at the profile first whether it’ll be a cock or a face so I don’t open them either. It’s not right but it happens. Does it offend me? Not really. I just move on. Should people do this? No of course not. Will they carry on doing it? Yep

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *hebfg2020Man
34 weeks ago

Doncaster


"To fully understand your perspective: I think some ladies should send me unsolicited videos of them wanking

Maybe with a shared experience I can relate better and give in-depth advise."

Haha ditto … shame its never the other way round a …..

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nightsoftheCoffeeTableCouple
34 weeks ago

Leeds


"I went to the supermarket the other day. Imagine how browned off I was when there were rows upon rows of things to buy. I'm going again this week. I hope there's nothing in there to buy or I'll be right dischuffed.

So if I throw my shopping into your basket that's ok is it, regardless if you want it or not.

What a ridiculous comparison.

Mrs

It is a bad comparison.

Though if I went shopping with my tits out in an adult only grocery store (oooh there's an idea) I'd kinda expect to see a few penises. Or maybe hope.

And also, I wouldn't complain if they put said penis in my basket if it was pretty and from a hot guy. But there we go!

Also, hot wedding pics!

Thanks had to have an alternative wedding album.

I expect to see explicit pics of course I do, I choose to look.

I don't expect adults to send unsolicited pics/vids like it's normal removing any consent regardless of the site.

Mrs

Somebody mentioned to me

tacit consent

Noun. tacit consent - (law) tacit approval of someone's wrongdoing

And I’m read into it, and see whether I agree I don’t agree with this.

If I actually being on here, we are already consent to this type of thing.

I’m 50/50 with the argument, but still hundred percent that we should always ask first.

“Can I please put my pretty penis into your basket?”

"

I don't like penis, keep it out my basket - now if you where to send one are you saying that's all well and good?

Mrs

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
34 weeks ago

in Lancashire


"If someone sent you an unsolicited wank video of the back of a totally unrelated forum post, how would you react ? Is reporting such a thing overreacting? I don't appreciate the gamut of cock picks but now it's a live one I like it even less ! I've blocked and yes I reported ! Am I being a prude lol. !

Yeah, you probably are over reacting a little bit, given this is a site largely dedicated to having sex with strangers, regardless of all the talk of connections. "

No..

Simply no, the Op is not over reacting and your idea of having sex with strangers might be for you and some others but not all by any means..

It shouldn't be excused because it's on here, it's non consensual and downright creepy..

Him

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ddie1966Man
34 weeks ago

Paper Town Central, Essex.

No.

I follow the rationale that if it's not asked for, it's not wanted.

Just plane un justified, no matter how this site is perceived.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago


"I went to the supermarket the other day. Imagine how browned off I was when there were rows upon rows of things to buy. I'm going again this week. I hope there's nothing in there to buy or I'll be right dischuffed.

So if I throw my shopping into your basket that's ok is it, regardless if you want it or not.

What a ridiculous comparison.

Mrs

It is a bad comparison.

Though if I went shopping with my tits out in an adult only grocery store (oooh there's an idea) I'd kinda expect to see a few penises. Or maybe hope.

And also, I wouldn't complain if they put said penis in my basket if it was pretty and from a hot guy. But there we go!

Also, hot wedding pics!

Thanks had to have an alternative wedding album.

I expect to see explicit pics of course I do, I choose to look.

I don't expect adults to send unsolicited pics/vids like it's normal removing any consent regardless of the site.

Mrs

Somebody mentioned to me

tacit consent

Noun. tacit consent - (law) tacit approval of someone's wrongdoing

And I’m read into it, and see whether I agree I don’t agree with this.

If I actually being on here, we are already consent to this type of thing.

I’m 50/50 with the argument, but still hundred percent that we should always ask first.

“Can I please put my pretty penis into your basket?”

I don't like penis, keep it out my basket - now if you where to send one are you saying that's all well and good?

Mrs "

No, Absolutely not, and I hope anyone was able to read that point which I (and others) have been putting all the way through this thread.

And by you saying it and making that point, it give you every right in the world to be fucked off, and do everything you can to make me learn a lesson in respect, if I sent you one. X

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago

If you don't want to look at a message there's an easy option to delete it and move to the next message.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nightsoftheCoffeeTableCouple
34 weeks ago

Leeds


"I went to the supermarket the other day. Imagine how browned off I was when there were rows upon rows of things to buy. I'm going again this week. I hope there's nothing in there to buy or I'll be right dischuffed.

So if I throw my shopping into your basket that's ok is it, regardless if you want it or not.

What a ridiculous comparison.

Mrs

It is a bad comparison.

Though if I went shopping with my tits out in an adult only grocery store (oooh there's an idea) I'd kinda expect to see a few penises. Or maybe hope.

And also, I wouldn't complain if they put said penis in my basket if it was pretty and from a hot guy. But there we go!

Also, hot wedding pics!

Thanks had to have an alternative wedding album.

I expect to see explicit pics of course I do, I choose to look.

I don't expect adults to send unsolicited pics/vids like it's normal removing any consent regardless of the site.

Mrs

Somebody mentioned to me

tacit consent

Noun. tacit consent - (law) tacit approval of someone's wrongdoing

And I’m read into it, and see whether I agree I don’t agree with this.

If I actually being on here, we are already consent to this type of thing.

I’m 50/50 with the argument, but still hundred percent that we should always ask first.

“Can I please put my pretty penis into your basket?”

I don't like penis, keep it out my basket - now if you where to send one are you saying that's all well and good?

Mrs

No, Absolutely not, and I hope anyone was able to read that point which I (and others) have been putting all the way through this thread.

And by you saying it and making that point, it give you every right in the world to be fucked off, and do everything you can to make me learn a lesson in respect, if I sent you one. X

"

Thank you

Mrs

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *unchalMan
34 weeks ago

Dartford


"No.... You're not being a prude at all OP. Its not a nice experience at all most of the time when a cock is shoved in our faces virtually & unexpectedly from a total stranger ....

But unfortunately on some sites & here too it's very common for that to happen....Cyber Flashing is rife...."

Hang on. This didn’t happen while she shopping in Tesco. It happened on a site where strangers look for sex with other strangers.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nightsoftheCoffeeTableCouple
34 weeks ago

Leeds


"No.... You're not being a prude at all OP. Its not a nice experience at all most of the time when a cock is shoved in our faces virtually & unexpectedly from a total stranger ....

But unfortunately on some sites & here too it's very common for that to happen....Cyber Flashing is rife....

Hang on. This didn’t happen while she shopping in Tesco. It happened on a site where strangers look for sex with other strangers. "

And what part of it being a swingers site takes away ones consent?

Mrs

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *inkyropecoupleCouple
34 weeks ago

carluke


"

Hang on. This didn’t happen while she shopping in Tesco. It happened on a site where strangers look for sex with other strangers. "

If it happened in Tesco, the person doing it would be on their way to being on a register.

None of us like cold callers telling us we had an accident and are due compensation, but would we be ok if they messaged us on here instead? No it wouldn’t.

So what makes it ok to it to happen on this site? It shouldn’t happen full stop, regardless of where it’s happened.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ilth N KinkCouple
34 weeks ago

Gloucester

Report for sure. It’s never acceptable to receive unsolicited pics even on this site

Kink (Mrs)

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ris GrayMan
34 weeks ago

Dorchester

I can honestly say I've never sent one

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *issmorganWoman
34 weeks ago

Calderdale innit

If i saw a video attached to a pic, I'd delete it as I'd assume it's not gonna be something I want to see.

Even with attached pics I'm looking at profiles and if I think it's iffy I'll just delete it now.

Just because women and couples are on a swinging site, doesn't entitle random men to send pics of their junk or explicit videos.

People should work on the basis that if others want to see, they will indicate that they do.

If I'd opened a wanking video from someone I've never spoken to, they'd get a curt reply and a block.

If somebody wants to report them for it, that's their choice and I'd love to know if there would be any action taken, if a few people reported them.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *urvyBi-84Man
34 weeks ago

Lancs


"If i saw a video attached to a pic, I'd delete it as I'd assume it's not gonna be something I want to see.

Even with attached pics I'm looking at profiles and if I think it's iffy I'll just delete it now.

Just because women and couples are on a swinging site, doesn't entitle random men to send pics of their junk or explicit videos.

People should work on the basis that if others want to see, they will indicate that they do.

If I'd opened a wanking video from someone I've never spoken to, they'd get a curt reply and a block.

If somebody wants to report them for it, that's their choice and I'd love to know if there would be any action taken, if a few people reported them.

"

This.

It being a swinging site does not entitle anyone to send unsolicited explicit direct messages to anyone else. Same as someone being in a swinger’s club - a club where people go to have sex with other people - does not entitle anyone to touch them or wank over them without consent.

What people have in their public avatars and pics is irrelevant. We’re not talking about what people choose to display publicly or what people choose to look at by accessing a profile. We’re talking about sending an explicit direct private message without consent. It’s not OK and not an overreaction to block and report it.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *eyond PurityCouple
34 weeks ago

Lincolnshire

Even in a sex club, if someone walked up to you and waved their cock in front of you, without ever speaking or connecting beforehand they would get spoken to and thrown out for indecent behaviour.

And indeed if it happened at a group social event organised on here. They’d get reported and thrown out.

So it should be no different on here.

K

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *uri00620Woman
34 weeks ago

Croydon

I mean I think you're pretty aware of the answer given you've reported and blocked already.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ouples_EroticaXXXCouple
34 weeks ago

manchester


"If someone sent you an unsolicited wank video of the back of a totally unrelated forum post, how would you react ? Is reporting such a thing overreacting? I don't appreciate the gamut of cock picks but now it's a live one I like it even less ! I've blocked and yes I reported ! Am I being a prude lol. ! "

Like any unsolicited dick pic/video we receive we inform the sender the message will be reported and inform them of the recent cyber flashing prosecution and the law around it. People seem to think being on a “sex site” provides them with freedom of consequence from such an act, which it does not.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ouples_EroticaXXXCouple
34 weeks ago

manchester


"Even in a sex club, if someone walked up to you and waved their cock in front of you, without ever speaking or connecting beforehand they would get spoken to and thrown out for indecent behaviour.

And indeed if it happened at a group social event organised on here. They’d get reported and thrown out.

So it should be no different on here.

K"

Exactly this

More needs to be done by the site owners. Ignorance is not a defence in this situation. Surely the site owners have a duty of care.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago

Honestly, I just delete the message and go about my day. I think I’ve been on here too long now that I’ve become so desensitised to it all.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oodmessMan
34 weeks ago

yumsville

If people aren't ok with sexual imagery, they aren't ok with sexual conversation. Anyone can send a 'hey, great tits' or 'hey, great cock', so if one is unsolicited and inappropriate then the other must be too.

The idea that you have to put "nothing unsolicited" on your profile so as to make a clear statement action will be taken means anyone without that is willing to receive. So the question goes back to the OP: is it prudish.

If no unsolicited pics/vids/chats is on your profile on an adults site, you must question why you are on the site specifically designed for swinging. Granted you don't want images sext every minute of the day but this isn't a chat app designed as mass media. It's an adult sex site, receiving it must be part of that interplay.

As a thought, while blocking those sending is obvious, people could easily block everyone as a standard, only messaging those they are interested in, making it clear they don't want to receive that type of material during any part of the conversation.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *aughty2yorksCouple
34 weeks ago

Leeds

We don’t mind it and depending on our mood at the time it can be a nice surprise, but do appreciate everyone has their own boundaries

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nightsoftheCoffeeTableCouple
34 weeks ago

Leeds


"Even in a sex club, if someone walked up to you and waved their cock in front of you, without ever speaking or connecting beforehand they would get spoken to and thrown out for indecent behaviour.

And indeed if it happened at a group social event organised on here. They’d get reported and thrown out.

So it should be no different on here.

K"

Exactly this, sex club, sex site either or isn't an excuse for not understanding consent.

Mrs

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oodmessMan
34 weeks ago

yumsville


"Even in a sex club, if someone walked up to you and waved their cock in front of you, without ever speaking or connecting beforehand they would get spoken to and thrown out for indecent behaviour.

And indeed if it happened at a group social event organised on here. They’d get reported and thrown out.

So it should be no different on here.

K

Exactly this, sex club, sex site either or isn't an excuse for not understanding consent.

Mrs "

I wonder if reporting women for shaking their boobs would gain the same traction

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ouples_EroticaXXXCouple
34 weeks ago

manchester

[Removed by poster at 25/03/24 12:29:28]

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ouples_EroticaXXXCouple
34 weeks ago

manchester


"Even in a sex club, if someone walked up to you and waved their cock in front of you, without ever speaking or connecting beforehand they would get spoken to and thrown out for indecent behaviour.

And indeed if it happened at a group social event organised on here. They’d get reported and thrown out.

So it should be no different on here.

K

Exactly this, sex club, sex site either or isn't an excuse for not understanding consent.

Mrs

I wonder if reporting women for shaking their boobs would gain the same traction

"

Whataboutary

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago

So many grown adults showing that they don’t understand consent

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ouples_EroticaXXXCouple
34 weeks ago

manchester


"So many grown adults showing that they don’t understand consent "

It’s scary isn’t it.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *rpeggioCouple
34 weeks ago

Baughurst

I (Mr. Arpeggio) find the sending of anything unsolicited childish and indicates a lack of maturity. I think it's wrong. There's no consent.

Report? That depends. Is there any site rules against sending unsolicited images? I do not think there are. Have not seen any post on this thread mentioning Fab rules about it. If there are then do report. If there aren't, no point in reporting I guess.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ittleMissCali_MrDJCouple
34 weeks ago

wonderland.


"If someone sent you an unsolicited wank video of the back of a totally unrelated forum post, how would you react ? Is reporting such a thing overreacting? I don't appreciate the gamut of cock picks but now it's a live one I like it even less ! I've blocked and yes I reported ! Am I being a prude lol. ! "
no I don't think your being a prude xx

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oodmessMan
34 weeks ago

yumsville


"Even in a sex club, if someone walked up to you and waved their cock in front of you, without ever speaking or connecting beforehand they would get spoken to and thrown out for indecent behaviour.

And indeed if it happened at a group social event organised on here. They’d get reported and thrown out.

So it should be no different on here.

K

Exactly this, sex club, sex site either or isn't an excuse for not understanding consent.

Mrs

I wonder if reporting women for shaking their boobs would gain the same traction

Whataboutary"

Never shook tits, is innocent of everything. Good to hear. You pass consent/non-consent, reporting, block, offence test.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *issmorganWoman
34 weeks ago

Calderdale innit


"Even in a sex club, if someone walked up to you and waved their cock in front of you, without ever speaking or connecting beforehand they would get spoken to and thrown out for indecent behaviour.

And indeed if it happened at a group social event organised on here. They’d get reported and thrown out.

So it should be no different on here.

K

Exactly this, sex club, sex site either or isn't an excuse for not understanding consent.

Mrs

I wonder if reporting women for shaking their boobs would gain the same traction

Whataboutary

Never shook tits, is innocent of everything. Good to hear. You pass consent/non-consent, reporting, block, offence test. "

Surely shaking your tits is different to taking a video of them and then sending it to people who haven't asked to see it though.

People can put what they like on their profiles.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago


"So many grown adults showing that they don’t understand consent

It’s scary isn’t it. "

Very! Especially here too

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nightsoftheCoffeeTableCouple
34 weeks ago

Leeds


"Even in a sex club, if someone walked up to you and waved their cock in front of you, without ever speaking or connecting beforehand they would get spoken to and thrown out for indecent behaviour.

And indeed if it happened at a group social event organised on here. They’d get reported and thrown out.

So it should be no different on here.

K

Exactly this, sex club, sex site either or isn't an excuse for not understanding consent.

Mrs

I wonder if reporting women for shaking their boobs would gain the same traction

"

Tits ain't genitals for a start, least come back and try and use a vagina for comparison, oh yeah I forgot I've never had an unsolicited vagina - because women generally have some sense of consent & class.

Mrs

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *he turned me GreyCouple
34 weeks ago

Warwick and Coventry

How would they react if it was their mum or sister that was having it done to them? I'm sure that they would be furious, but yet it's justified as its a swingers site...

Like take yourself off to the corner, and slap your cock, for being a very very naughty boy....

Mr

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *he turned me GreyCouple
34 weeks ago

Warwick and Coventry


"How would they react if it was their mum or sister that was having it done to them? I'm sure that they would be furious, but yet it's justified as its a swingers site...

Like take yourself off to the corner, and slap your cock, for being a very very naughty boy....

Mr "

It comes down to consent, if that happened in a club, I'd be flicking him with a stretched out condom on sensitive areas, well I'd do worse to be fair

Mr

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oodmessMan
34 weeks ago

yumsville


"Even in a sex club, if someone walked up to you and waved their cock in front of you, without ever speaking or connecting beforehand they would get spoken to and thrown out for indecent behaviour.

And indeed if it happened at a group social event organised on here. They’d get reported and thrown out.

So it should be no different on here.

K

Exactly this, sex club, sex site either or isn't an excuse for not understanding consent.

Mrs

I wonder if reporting women for shaking their boobs would gain the same traction

Tits ain't genitals for a start, least come back and try and use a vagina for comparison, oh yeah I forgot I've never had an unsolicited vagina - because women generally have some sense of consent & class.

Mrs "

You understand the point then. You have to have rules for both if offence is drawn for one. A guy waving his dick at you in a club or a woman rubbing herself off.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago

Fab is such funny old site.

There is this thread, where people are reporting others for sending unsolicited videos and at the same time another thread where women state they enjoy receiving inbox messages from guys taking pictures of their dicks over their photos.

Perhaps we should have tick box to say “Yes, send me pictures” / “No, not send pictures until we have chatted” / “No, don’t send pictures unless I ask”

That way there is no confusion.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nightsoftheCoffeeTableCouple
34 weeks ago

Leeds


"Fab is such funny old site.

There is this thread, where people are reporting others for sending unsolicited videos and at the same time another thread where women state they enjoy receiving inbox messages from guys taking pictures of their dicks over their photos.

Perhaps we should have tick box to say “Yes, send me pictures” / “No, not send pictures until we have chatted” / “No, don’t send pictures unless I ask”

That way there is no confusion. "

Now finally a sensible answer & a solution.

Mrs

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nightsoftheCoffeeTableCouple
34 weeks ago

Leeds


"Even in a sex club, if someone walked up to you and waved their cock in front of you, without ever speaking or connecting beforehand they would get spoken to and thrown out for indecent behaviour.

And indeed if it happened at a group social event organised on here. They’d get reported and thrown out.

So it should be no different on here.

K

Exactly this, sex club, sex site either or isn't an excuse for not understanding consent.

Mrs

I wonder if reporting women for shaking their boobs would gain the same traction

Tits ain't genitals for a start, least come back and try and use a vagina for comparison, oh yeah I forgot I've never had an unsolicited vagina - because women generally have some sense of consent & class.

Mrs

You understand the point then. You have to have rules for both if offence is drawn for one. A guy waving his dick at you in a club or a woman rubbing herself off. "

If either guy or woman shoved their genitals in my face without consent they are both wrong.

If they did this in a club they'd both get kicked out.

I'm struggling to see which part of this you take an issue with.

Mrs

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *issmorganWoman
34 weeks ago

Calderdale innit


"Fab is such funny old site.

There is this thread, where people are reporting others for sending unsolicited videos and at the same time another thread where women state they enjoy receiving inbox messages from guys taking pictures of their dicks over their photos.

Perhaps we should have tick box to say “Yes, send me pictures” / “No, not send pictures until we have chatted” / “No, don’t send pictures unless I ask”

That way there is no confusion.

Now finally a sensible answer & a solution.

Mrs "

The problem is would others abide by it, many don't read a profile or they do and still choose to send cock shots.

Maybe people could simply try asking others before they send pics.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oodmessMan
34 weeks ago

yumsville


"Even in a sex club, if someone walked up to you and waved their cock in front of you, without ever speaking or connecting beforehand they would get spoken to and thrown out for indecent behaviour.

And indeed if it happened at a group social event organised on here. They’d get reported and thrown out.

So it should be no different on here.

K

Exactly this, sex club, sex site either or isn't an excuse for not understanding consent.

Mrs

I wonder if reporting women for shaking their boobs would gain the same traction

Whataboutary

Never shook tits, is innocent of everything. Good to hear. You pass consent/non-consent, reporting, block, offence test.

Surely shaking your tits is different to taking a video of them and then sending it to people who haven't asked to see it though.

People can put what they like on their profiles. "

The point was being made about shaking stuff unsolicited in a club. I've already said women no doubt get too much of it on here (though filters are there), though if men can get reported and thrown out of a club the same must apply to women. Whataboutary and tit's weren't offensive enough apparently.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nightsoftheCoffeeTableCouple
34 weeks ago

Leeds


"Even in a sex club, if someone walked up to you and waved their cock in front of you, without ever speaking or connecting beforehand they would get spoken to and thrown out for indecent behaviour.

And indeed if it happened at a group social event organised on here. They’d get reported and thrown out.

So it should be no different on here.

K

Exactly this, sex club, sex site either or isn't an excuse for not understanding consent.

Mrs

I wonder if reporting women for shaking their boobs would gain the same traction

Whataboutary

Never shook tits, is innocent of everything. Good to hear. You pass consent/non-consent, reporting, block, offence test.

Surely shaking your tits is different to taking a video of them and then sending it to people who haven't asked to see it though.

People can put what they like on their profiles.

The point was being made about shaking stuff unsolicited in a club. I've already said women no doubt get too much of it on here (though filters are there), though if men can get reported and thrown out of a club the same must apply to women. Whataboutary and tit's weren't offensive enough apparently. "

The same does apply just most women don't shove their vagina in someone's face.

Tits and chest are a comparison, genitals and genitals are a comparison, you can't compare a chest with a cock or a knee with an elbow.

Mrs

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *he turned me GreyCouple
34 weeks ago

Warwick and Coventry


"Even in a sex club, if someone walked up to you and waved their cock in front of you, without ever speaking or connecting beforehand they would get spoken to and thrown out for indecent behaviour.

And indeed if it happened at a group social event organised on here. They’d get reported and thrown out.

So it should be no different on here.

K

Exactly this, sex club, sex site either or isn't an excuse for not understanding consent.

Mrs

I wonder if reporting women for shaking their boobs would gain the same traction

Whataboutary

Never shook tits, is innocent of everything. Good to hear. You pass consent/non-consent, reporting, block, offence test.

Surely shaking your tits is different to taking a video of them and then sending it to people who haven't asked to see it though.

People can put what they like on their profiles.

The point was being made about shaking stuff unsolicited in a club. I've already said women no doubt get too much of it on here (though filters are there), though if men can get reported and thrown out of a club the same must apply to women. Whataboutary and tit's weren't offensive enough apparently. "

Women do get thrown out clubs for the same behaviour, consent isn't a gender specific thing now is it. In my experience women tend to ask for consent first. Where as some do not that's men women couples included.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ex HolesMan
34 weeks ago

Up North

Thank you to ones who’ve sent me vag so far, it’s appreciated

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *he turned me GreyCouple
34 weeks ago

Warwick and Coventry


"Even in a sex club, if someone walked up to you and waved their cock in front of you, without ever speaking or connecting beforehand they would get spoken to and thrown out for indecent behaviour.

And indeed if it happened at a group social event organised on here. They’d get reported and thrown out.

So it should be no different on here.

K

Exactly this, sex club, sex site either or isn't an excuse for not understanding consent.

Mrs

I wonder if reporting women for shaking their boobs would gain the same traction

Whataboutary

Never shook tits, is innocent of everything. Good to hear. You pass consent/non-consent, reporting, block, offence test.

Surely shaking your tits is different to taking a video of them and then sending it to people who haven't asked to see it though.

People can put what they like on their profiles.

The point was being made about shaking stuff unsolicited in a club. I've already said women no doubt get too much of it on here (though filters are there), though if men can get reported and thrown out of a club the same must apply to women. Whataboutary and tit's weren't offensive enough apparently. "

So because filters are there, that justifies and excuses shit behaviour, no your just enabling people's bullshit by saying that. Where is the ownership and accountability for deciding to behave in a certain manner...

Mr

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oodmessMan
34 weeks ago

yumsville


"

I'm struggling to see which part of this you take an issue with.

Mrs "

The thread is talking about consent, offence, there's a whole lot of outrage, talk of misogyny and reporting. What is offensive to one, isn't to another.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ad NannaWoman
34 weeks ago

East London


"Thank you to ones who’ve sent me vag so far, it’s appreciated "

Oh, so tempting.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago


"Even in a sex club, if someone walked up to you and waved their cock in front of you, without ever speaking or connecting beforehand they would get spoken to and thrown out for indecent behaviour.

And indeed if it happened at a group social event organised on here. They’d get reported and thrown out.

So it should be no different on here.

K

Exactly this, sex club, sex site either or isn't an excuse for not understanding consent.

Mrs

I wonder if reporting women for shaking their boobs would gain the same traction

Whataboutary

Never shook tits, is innocent of everything. Good to hear. You pass consent/non-consent, reporting, block, offence test.

Surely shaking your tits is different to taking a video of them and then sending it to people who haven't asked to see it though.

People can put what they like on their profiles.

The point was being made about shaking stuff unsolicited in a club. I've already said women no doubt get too much of it on here (though filters are there), though if men can get reported and thrown out of a club the same must apply to women. Whataboutary and tit's weren't offensive enough apparently.

The same does apply just most women don't shove their vagina in someone's face.

Tits and chest are a comparison, genitals and genitals are a comparison, you can't compare a chest with a cock or a knee with an elbow.

Mrs "

I had a woman constantly send me photos of her very large tits & let's just say they weren't attractive tits..so yes women do send unsolicited content too & cyber flash & should be treated the very same way as their make counter parts

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nightsoftheCoffeeTableCouple
34 weeks ago

Leeds


"Even in a sex club, if someone walked up to you and waved their cock in front of you, without ever speaking or connecting beforehand they would get spoken to and thrown out for indecent behaviour.

And indeed if it happened at a group social event organised on here. They’d get reported and thrown out.

So it should be no different on here.

K

Exactly this, sex club, sex site either or isn't an excuse for not understanding consent.

Mrs

I wonder if reporting women for shaking their boobs would gain the same traction

Whataboutary

Never shook tits, is innocent of everything. Good to hear. You pass consent/non-consent, reporting, block, offence test.

Surely shaking your tits is different to taking a video of them and then sending it to people who haven't asked to see it though.

People can put what they like on their profiles.

The point was being made about shaking stuff unsolicited in a club. I've already said women no doubt get too much of it on here (though filters are there), though if men can get reported and thrown out of a club the same must apply to women. Whataboutary and tit's weren't offensive enough apparently.

The same does apply just most women don't shove their vagina in someone's face.

Tits and chest are a comparison, genitals and genitals are a comparison, you can't compare a chest with a cock or a knee with an elbow.

Mrs

I had a woman constantly send me photos of her very large tits & let's just say they weren't attractive tits..so yes women do send unsolicited content too & cyber flash & should be treated the very same way as their make counter parts"

Hence **most women & the same does apply.

Mrs

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago


"Even in a sex club, if someone walked up to you and waved their cock in front of you, without ever speaking or connecting beforehand they would get spoken to and thrown out for indecent behaviour.

And indeed if it happened at a group social event organised on here. They’d get reported and thrown out.

So it should be no different on here.

K

Exactly this, sex club, sex site either or isn't an excuse for not understanding consent.

Mrs

I wonder if reporting women for shaking their boobs would gain the same traction

Whataboutary

Never shook tits, is innocent of everything. Good to hear. You pass consent/non-consent, reporting, block, offence test.

Surely shaking your tits is different to taking a video of them and then sending it to people who haven't asked to see it though.

People can put what they like on their profiles.

The point was being made about shaking stuff unsolicited in a club. I've already said women no doubt get too much of it on here (though filters are there), though if men can get reported and thrown out of a club the same must apply to women. Whataboutary and tit's weren't offensive enough apparently.

The same does apply just most women don't shove their vagina in someone's face.

Tits and chest are a comparison, genitals and genitals are a comparison, you can't compare a chest with a cock or a knee with an elbow.

Mrs

I had a woman constantly send me photos of her very large tits & let's just say they weren't attractive tits..so yes women do send unsolicited content too & cyber flash & should be treated the very same way as their make counter parts"

*male counterparts

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ex HolesMan
34 weeks ago

Up North


"Thank you to ones who’ve sent me vag so far, it’s appreciated

Oh, so tempting."

Please include your bum hole as well

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nightsoftheCoffeeTableCouple
34 weeks ago

Leeds


"

I'm struggling to see which part of this you take an issue with.

Mrs

The thread is talking about consent, offence, there's a whole lot of outrage, talk of misogyny and reporting. What is offensive to one, isn't to another. "

And for the 4th time a man or woman that does it is wrong.

Mrs

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ea monkeyMan
34 weeks ago

Manchester (he/him)

It’s cyber flashing. Nothing less, as such it’s now illegal.

Your feelings on it are completely valid and no one should be telling you to ‘suck it up’ or that it’s to be expected. No matter what site you’re on or what your profile picture is.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ebaucherous_duoCouple
34 weeks ago

Bristol/ Daventry


" Yeah, you probably are over reacting a little bit, given this is a site largely dedicated to having sex with strangers, regardless of all the talk of connections. "

They are absolutely not over reacting. Digital flashing is a crime for a reason. Regardless of what you feel the site is for, there is no reason to send unsolicited photos or videos. Ever

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago

I would really like to read a mods opinion on where the website stand on this.

Is it the equivalent of flashing in public?

Because that was a question, are you being a prude? Or is it it reportable?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nightsoftheCoffeeTableCouple
34 weeks ago

Leeds


"I would really like to read a mods opinion on where the website stand on this.

Is it the equivalent of flashing in public?

Because that was a question, are you being a prude? Or is it it reportable? "

I'd like to see that too as many of the previous ones have been deleted on the subject.

Mrs

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oodmessMan
34 weeks ago

yumsville


"

Women do get thrown out clubs for the same behaviour, consent isn't a gender specific thing now is it. In my experience women tend to ask for consent first. Where as some do not that's men women couples included. "

Ask for consent - sex wise?? I would hope they do. I think you are conflating this into a different issue here.


"

So because filters are there, that justifies and excuses shit behaviour, no your just enabling people's bullshit by saying that. Where is the ownership and accountability for deciding to behave in a certain manner...

Mr "

Both women and couples have said they are not offended. Even the OP has said is part of the territory, that this thread has escalated. Unless you want a complete block on sending explicit material, you're going to have to realise you're on an adult site. I've not excused anyone's behaviour, just given perspective.

If you are banning sending explicit video, you are banning unwanted sexual communication ... how you go about wanting sexual communication, opens up a reasonably dull area of "do you consent to sexual chat", "are you offended by sexual content"

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ris GrayMan
34 weeks ago

Dorchester


"I would really like to read a mods opinion on where the website stand on this.

Is it the equivalent of flashing in public?

Because that was a question, are you being a prude? Or is it it reportable? "

me to

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *he turned me GreyCouple
34 weeks ago

Warwick and Coventry


"I would really like to read a mods opinion on where the website stand on this.

Is it the equivalent of flashing in public?

Because that was a question, are you being a prude? Or is it it reportable?

I'd like to see that too as many of the previous ones have been deleted on the subject.

Mrs "

The mods opinions on this isn't really important, it's what admin deems as being offensive and what isn't offensive..

Mr

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ris GrayMan
34 weeks ago

Dorchester


"I would really like to read a mods opinion on where the website stand on this.

Is it the equivalent of flashing in public?

Because that was a question, are you being a prude? Or is it it reportable?

I'd like to see that too as many of the previous ones have been deleted on the subject.

Mrs

The mods opinions on this isn't really important, it's what admin deems as being offensive and what isn't offensive..

Mr "

Admin is the mods and the mods are admin

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ellinever70Woman
34 weeks ago

Ayrshire

We're not going to get people behaving the way we want them to (in this case, not sending cock pics/vids).

If this is cyber flashing ( on here, it seems more nuanced)-who's going to be willing to use the mechanism of the law to bring the senders to task?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nightsoftheCoffeeTableCouple
34 weeks ago

Leeds


"I would really like to read a mods opinion on where the website stand on this.

Is it the equivalent of flashing in public?

Because that was a question, are you being a prude? Or is it it reportable?

I'd like to see that too as many of the previous ones have been deleted on the subject.

Mrs

The mods opinions on this isn't really important, it's what admin deems as being offensive and what isn't offensive..

Mr "

I've asked them already with zero response.

Mrs

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ris GrayMan
34 weeks ago

Dorchester


"We're not going to get people behaving the way we want them to (in this case, not sending cock pics/vids).

If this is cyber flashing ( on here, it seems more nuanced)-who's going to be willing to use the mechanism of the law to bring the senders to task?"

exactly

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ools and the brainCouple
34 weeks ago

couple, us we him her.

Fact is someone people actually enjoy receiving pictures and videos.

The options are available to stop site images or being messaged.

As I've said before a change to the message system in that pictures or videos sent to a person the recipient would have to click on it to view, that way people can choose to view or not but still read the message.

Or as I said simply block all site images and turn back on if you wish to exchange pictures with others.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *he turned me GreyCouple
34 weeks ago

Warwick and Coventry


"

Women do get thrown out clubs for the same behaviour, consent isn't a gender specific thing now is it. In my experience women tend to ask for consent first. Where as some do not that's men women couples included.

Ask for consent - sex wise?? I would hope they do. I think you are conflating this into a different issue here.

So because filters are there, that justifies and excuses shit behaviour, no your just enabling people's bullshit by saying that. Where is the ownership and accountability for deciding to behave in a certain manner...

Mr

Both women and couples have said they are not offended. Even the OP has said is part of the territory, that this thread has escalated. Unless you want a complete block on sending explicit material, you're going to have to realise you're on an adult site. I've not excused anyone's behaviour, just given perspective.

If you are banning sending explicit video, you are banning unwanted sexual communication ... how you go about wanting sexual communication, opens up a reasonably dull area of "do you consent to sexual chat", "are you offended by sexual content""

I'm so glad you gave perspective, as I've been in the wrong place for the past 7 years...

I thought this was the Blue Peter Fan club....here's one I consented to earlier...

Mr

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *he turned me GreyCouple
34 weeks ago

Warwick and Coventry


"I would really like to read a mods opinion on where the website stand on this.

Is it the equivalent of flashing in public?

Because that was a question, are you being a prude? Or is it it reportable?

I'd like to see that too as many of the previous ones have been deleted on the subject.

Mrs

The mods opinions on this isn't really important, it's what admin deems as being offensive and what isn't offensive..

Mr

I've asked them already with zero response.

Mrs "

Kinda standard really, no response

Mr

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago

Nope I had similar last week and again yesterday. It has now led me to hide my profile and close my inbox! Makes me feel sick

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nightsoftheCoffeeTableCouple
34 weeks ago

Leeds


"

Women do get thrown out clubs for the same behaviour, consent isn't a gender specific thing now is it. In my experience women tend to ask for consent first. Where as some do not that's men women couples included.

Ask for consent - sex wise?? I would hope they do. I think you are conflating this into a different issue here.

So because filters are there, that justifies and excuses shit behaviour, no your just enabling people's bullshit by saying that. Where is the ownership and accountability for deciding to behave in a certain manner...

Mr

Both women and couples have said they are not offended. Even the OP has said is part of the territory, that this thread has escalated. Unless you want a complete block on sending explicit material, you're going to have to realise you're on an adult site. I've not excused anyone's behaviour, just given perspective.

If you are banning sending explicit video, you are banning unwanted sexual communication ... how you go about wanting sexual communication, opens up a reasonably dull area of "do you consent to sexual chat", "are you offended by sexual content""

This just isn't right though is it.

For a start sexual conversation develops - not heres my cock now let's fuck.

It's a conversation a getting to know each other it develops towards sexual stuff.

Sending a wanking video isn't at all not wanting sexual communication with someone you have got on with and are heading that way with it's a unwanted video in your face.

A random cock/vag in your face from a stranger isn't ok, no matter how you try and phrase it and no in no way does that mean you aren't looking for sex on here.

We should be able to chose who we get sexual conversation with and sexual photos from not some slimy creep that thinks it appropriate to show everyone his/her genitals.

It's not sexy.

Just because some don't mind it doesn't make it right.

I quite like my man's cock does that mean I'm open to all cocks in my face - no! There minging.

Mrs

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago


"I would really like to read a mods opinion on where the website stand on this.

Is it the equivalent of flashing in public?

Because that was a question, are you being a prude? Or is it it reportable?

I'd like to see that too as many of the previous ones have been deleted on the subject.

Mrs

The mods opinions on this isn't really important, it's what admin deems as being offensive and what isn't offensive..

Mr "

Okay. Do you think they would deem it offensive?

Because if they actually do, surely it is then reportable and would result in a clear rule where we could refer to. no?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nightsoftheCoffeeTableCouple
34 weeks ago

Leeds


"I would really like to read a mods opinion on where the website stand on this.

Is it the equivalent of flashing in public?

Because that was a question, are you being a prude? Or is it it reportable?

I'd like to see that too as many of the previous ones have been deleted on the subject.

Mrs

The mods opinions on this isn't really important, it's what admin deems as being offensive and what isn't offensive..

Mr

Okay. Do you think they would deem it offensive?

Because if they actually do, surely it is then reportable and would result in a clear rule where we could refer to. no? "

According to the terms and conditions they abide by UK law and we ourselves are responsible for what is sent in private message & encouraged to report as we seem appropriate.

To me the law is pretty clear.

Mrs

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *he turned me GreyCouple
34 weeks ago

Warwick and Coventry


"I would really like to read a mods opinion on where the website stand on this.

Is it the equivalent of flashing in public?

Because that was a question, are you being a prude? Or is it it reportable?

I'd like to see that too as many of the previous ones have been deleted on the subject.

Mrs

The mods opinions on this isn't really important, it's what admin deems as being offensive and what isn't offensive..

Mr

Okay. Do you think they would deem it offensive?

Because if they actually do, surely it is then reportable and would result in a clear rule where we could refer to. no? "

Tbh honest Woody, what admin/mods deem as offensive, is above my pay grade I'm afraid.

I stay in my own lane and monitor my own behaviour or not depending on how much of a cunt I wanna be.

Mr

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *omKsubSMan
34 weeks ago

Newton

In law it comes down to 'would a reasonable person expect'

Since this is a sex/hookup/swinger site then yes, a reasonable person would expect to be exposed to intimate and graphic images.

Personally though, I wouldnt send either randomly.

I've only ever sent two actual dick pics, both were requested and I had been talking to the recipient for some time.

I've also only sent one bank video, again it was requested and the recipient was a long term sub who had been wanting it for several months.

I do send joke dick and impressive cock pics though, which I do to gauge sense of humour.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ad NannaWoman
34 weeks ago

East London


"Thank you to ones who’ve sent me vag so far, it’s appreciated

Oh, so tempting.

Please include your bum hole as well "

I have it here in writing so you'll get my bum hole too, piles included

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ris GrayMan
34 weeks ago

Dorchester


"

Women do get thrown out clubs for the same behaviour, consent isn't a gender specific thing now is it. In my experience women tend to ask for consent first. Where as some do not that's men women couples included.

Ask for consent - sex wise?? I would hope they do. I think you are conflating this into a different issue here.

So because filters are there, that justifies and excuses shit behaviour, no your just enabling people's bullshit by saying that. Where is the ownership and accountability for deciding to behave in a certain manner...

Mr

Both women and couples have said they are not offended. Even the OP has said is part of the territory, that this thread has escalated. Unless you want a complete block on sending explicit material, you're going to have to realise you're on an adult site. I've not excused anyone's behaviour, just given perspective.

If you are banning sending explicit video, you are banning unwanted sexual communication ... how you go about wanting sexual communication, opens up a reasonably dull area of "do you consent to sexual chat", "are you offended by sexual content"

This just isn't right though is it.

For a start sexual conversation develops - not heres my cock now let's fuck.

It's a conversation a getting to know each other it develops towards sexual stuff.

Sending a wanking video isn't at all not wanting sexual communication with someone you have got on with and are heading that way with it's a unwanted video in your face.

A random cock/vag in your face from a stranger isn't ok, no matter how you try and phrase it and no in no way does that mean you aren't looking for sex on here.

We should be able to chose who we get sexual conversation with and sexual photos from not some slimy creep that thinks it appropriate to show everyone his/her genitals.

It's not sexy.

Just because some don't mind it doesn't make it right.

I quite like my man's cock does that mean I'm open to all cocks in my face - no! There minging.

Mrs

"

Yes but what you are saying means its all done on your terms so you look and you choose to talk sex or not, this app is regarded as a sex app /site. You show explicit content and you therefore have to be by that nature open to sexual innuendo and explicit vids and pics otherwise you block that content so it can't be sent.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oodmessMan
34 weeks ago

yumsville


"

Women do get thrown out clubs for the same behaviour, consent isn't a gender specific thing now is it. In my experience women tend to ask for consent first. Where as some do not that's men women couples included.

Ask for consent - sex wise?? I would hope they do. I think you are conflating this into a different issue here.

So because filters are there, that justifies and excuses shit behaviour, no your just enabling people's bullshit by saying that. Where is the ownership and accountability for deciding to behave in a certain manner...

Mr

Both women and couples have said they are not offended. Even the OP has said is part of the territory, that this thread has escalated. Unless you want a complete block on sending explicit material, you're going to have to realise you're on an adult site. I've not excused anyone's behaviour, just given perspective.

If you are banning sending explicit video, you are banning unwanted sexual communication ... how you go about wanting sexual communication, opens up a reasonably dull area of "do you consent to sexual chat", "are you offended by sexual content"

This just isn't right though is it.

For a start sexual conversation develops - not heres my cock now let's fuck.

It's a conversation a getting to know each other it develops towards sexual stuff.

Sending a wanking video isn't at all not wanting sexual communication with someone you have got on with and are heading that way with it's a unwanted video in your face.

A random cock/vag in your face from a stranger isn't ok, no matter how you try and phrase it and no in no way does that mean you aren't looking for sex on here.

We should be able to chose who we get sexual conversation with and sexual photos from not some slimy creep that thinks it appropriate to show everyone his/her genitals.

It's not sexy.

Just because some don't mind it doesn't make it right.

I quite like my man's cock does that mean I'm open to all cocks in my face - no! There minging.

Mrs

"

You've never had a nice pussy message? I've have countless 'how big is your dick', 'I want that cock in my arse", that is a stater mail, if I'm to wrack my brains I could come up with a few more but point being, anyone could receive any message without warning of "good looking tits", find it offensive and report someone.

Receiving an explicit video doesn't limit someone's consent to sexual content, the site itself does, and this is an adult site.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago


"I ….

The mods opinions on this isn't really important, it's what admin deems as being offensive and what isn't offensive..

Mr

Okay. Do you think they would deem it offensive?

Because if they actually do, surely it is then reportable and would result in a clear rule where we could refer to. no?

Tbh honest Woody, what admin/mods deem as offensive, is above my pay grade I'm afraid.

I stay in my own lane and monitor my own behaviour or not depending on how much of a cunt I wanna be.

Mr "

Haha. That’s the best we all can do isn’t it?

What bothers me is, the people who are sending these dick pics won’t read the views in this thread, so the message that it’s wrong, is never going to get out there.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago

No. They should have the decency to ask first.i wouldn’t like an unsolicited pic let alone a video

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ex HolesMan
34 weeks ago

Up North


"Thank you to ones who’ve sent me vag so far, it’s appreciated

Oh, so tempting.

Please include your bum hole as well

I have it here in writing so you'll get my bum hole too, piles included "

I like something to chew on

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *izandpaulCouple
34 weeks ago

merseyside


"Fab is such funny old site.

There is this thread, where people are reporting others for sending unsolicited videos and at the same time another thread where women state they enjoy receiving inbox messages from guys taking pictures of their dicks over their photos.

Perhaps we should have tick box to say “Yes, send me pictures” / “No, not send pictures until we have chatted” / “No, don’t send pictures unless I ask”

That way there is no confusion. "

But sadly that would entail reading a profile and that's where many men and women (with class or not) fall short.

For me, I consent on this swingers site, not in the real world, for you to send anything, as long as its legal but don't expect me to respond or not delete it or indeed report it.

Liz. X

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ea monkeyMan
34 weeks ago

Manchester (he/him)


"I would really like to read a mods opinion on where the website stand on this.

Is it the equivalent of flashing in public?

Because that was a question, are you being a prude? Or is it it reportable?

I'd like to see that too as many of the previous ones have been deleted on the subject.

Mrs

The mods opinions on this isn't really important, it's what admin deems as being offensive and what isn't offensive..

Mr

Okay. Do you think they would deem it offensive?

Because if they actually do, surely it is then reportable and would result in a clear rule where we could refer to. no? "

Do we really need a mod/admin to say don’t do what is illegal?

Consent is consent. If none has been given then it’s not okay. No grey area.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago


"Fab is such funny old site.

There is this thread, where people are reporting others for sending unsolicited videos and at the same time another thread where women state they enjoy receiving inbox messages from guys taking pictures of their dicks over their photos.

Perhaps we should have tick box to say “Yes, send me pictures” / “No, not send pictures until we have chatted” / “No, don’t send pictures unless I ask”

That way there is no confusion.

But sadly that would entail reading a profile and that's where many men and women (with class or not) fall short.

For me, I consent on this swingers site, not in the real world, for you to send anything, as long as its legal but don't expect me to respond or not delete it or indeed report it.

Liz. X

"

Very true.

Maybe upon signing up for the site it is made clear that you may receive pic/videos of a naughty (but legal) nature and signing up for this site you are agreeing to this.

Or

Implement a control for a user to blur/block incoming photos/videos.

Plenty of options, I’m sure.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nightsoftheCoffeeTableCouple
34 weeks ago

Leeds


"

Women do get thrown out clubs for the same behaviour, consent isn't a gender specific thing now is it. In my experience women tend to ask for consent first. Where as some do not that's men women couples included.

Ask for consent - sex wise?? I would hope they do. I think you are conflating this into a different issue here.

So because filters are there, that justifies and excuses shit behaviour, no your just enabling people's bullshit by saying that. Where is the ownership and accountability for deciding to behave in a certain manner...

Mr

Both women and couples have said they are not offended. Even the OP has said is part of the territory, that this thread has escalated. Unless you want a complete block on sending explicit material, you're going to have to realise you're on an adult site. I've not excused anyone's behaviour, just given perspective.

If you are banning sending explicit video, you are banning unwanted sexual communication ... how you go about wanting sexual communication, opens up a reasonably dull area of "do you consent to sexual chat", "are you offended by sexual content"

This just isn't right though is it.

For a start sexual conversation develops - not heres my cock now let's fuck.

It's a conversation a getting to know each other it develops towards sexual stuff.

Sending a wanking video isn't at all not wanting sexual communication with someone you have got on with and are heading that way with it's a unwanted video in your face.

A random cock/vag in your face from a stranger isn't ok, no matter how you try and phrase it and no in no way does that mean you aren't looking for sex on here.

We should be able to chose who we get sexual conversation with and sexual photos from not some slimy creep that thinks it appropriate to show everyone his/her genitals.

It's not sexy.

Just because some don't mind it doesn't make it right.

I quite like my man's cock does that mean I'm open to all cocks in my face - no! There minging.

Mrs

You've never had a nice pussy message? I've have countless 'how big is your dick', 'I want that cock in my arse", that is a stater mail, if I'm to wrack my brains I could come up with a few more but point being, anyone could receive any message without warning of "good looking tits", find it offensive and report someone.

Receiving an explicit video doesn't limit someone's consent to sexual content, the site itself does, and this is an adult site. "

An adult site doesn't change the law & of course I've received those shitty messages, talking sex isn't illegal - cyber flashing is.

I can look at any profile and I choose to view that knowing exactly what maybe on it, that's on me.

Someone sending me a video of them wanking over me is not on me, it's not my choice & it's wrong, simple as.

Mrs

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nightsoftheCoffeeTableCouple
34 weeks ago

Leeds


"I would really like to read a mods opinion on where the website stand on this.

Is it the equivalent of flashing in public?

Because that was a question, are you being a prude? Or is it it reportable?

I'd like to see that too as many of the previous ones have been deleted on the subject.

Mrs

The mods opinions on this isn't really important, it's what admin deems as being offensive and what isn't offensive..

Mr

Okay. Do you think they would deem it offensive?

Because if they actually do, surely it is then reportable and would result in a clear rule where we could refer to. no?

Do we really need a mod/admin to say don’t do what is illegal?

Consent is consent. If none has been given then it’s not okay. No grey area.

"

Exactly this how difficult is it.

Mrs

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ouples_EroticaXXXCouple
34 weeks ago

manchester


"It’s cyber flashing. Nothing less, as such it’s now illegal.

Your feelings on it are completely valid and no one should be telling you to ‘suck it up’ or that it’s to be expected. No matter what site you’re on or what your profile picture is.

"

We inform anyone who sends us unsolicited dick/vagina pics of this. Cyber flashing laws are a very much welcomed.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nightsoftheCoffeeTableCouple
34 weeks ago

Leeds


"Fab is such funny old site.

There is this thread, where people are reporting others for sending unsolicited videos and at the same time another thread where women state they enjoy receiving inbox messages from guys taking pictures of their dicks over their photos.

Perhaps we should have tick box to say “Yes, send me pictures” / “No, not send pictures until we have chatted” / “No, don’t send pictures unless I ask”

That way there is no confusion.

But sadly that would entail reading a profile and that's where many men and women (with class or not) fall short.

For me, I consent on this swingers site, not in the real world, for you to send anything, as long as its legal but don't expect me to respond or not delete it or indeed report it.

Liz. X

Very true.

Maybe upon signing up for the site it is made clear that you may receive pic/videos of a naughty (but legal) nature and signing up for this site you are agreeing to this.

Or

Implement a control for a user to blur/block incoming photos/videos.

Plenty of options, I’m sure.

"

And here - legal.

Cyber flashing isn't legal anymore.

Consent!

Mrs

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *issmorganWoman
34 weeks ago

Calderdale innit

For all those saying well it's a sex site, it's the nature of the site to see explicit images.

Yes it's a swingers site, some use it as a sex site.People can put whatever they want in their profiles, as others can choose not to look.

If Someone specifically states they don't want a cock/pussy pic in their inbox, why are some making excuses for those who still send them.

If more people read profiles and thought about their own actions first, this wouldn't be so much of a problem.

Just because someone has signed up to being on here, doesn't mean they want loads of randomers genitals in their inbox regularly.

Especially when they are probably not gonna be meeting them.

I've said this on a diff thread, I had a non sexual status up. A bloke from miles away replied and attached 6 cock pics in the message, just why is it ok to do that because I have an account on here.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *he turned me GreyCouple
34 weeks ago

Warwick and Coventry


"I ….

The mods opinions on this isn't really important, it's what admin deems as being offensive and what isn't offensive..

Mr

Okay. Do you think they would deem it offensive?

Because if they actually do, surely it is then reportable and would result in a clear rule where we could refer to. no?

Tbh honest Woody, what admin/mods deem as offensive, is above my pay grade I'm afraid.

I stay in my own lane and monitor my own behaviour or not depending on how much of a cunt I wanna be.

Mr

Haha. That’s the best we all can do isn’t it?

What bothers me is, the people who are sending these dick pics won’t read the views in this thread, so the message that it’s wrong, is never going to get out there. "

I hear that, but if one person who sees it being called out, and realises that its not okay, or that people are not alright with it. And they then amend there behaviour going forward. Then that's a success right.

I'd ask yourself the question Woody, why does it bother you so much?

Your taking on others shame, when it's not yours to take on, some food for thought. If you believe it to wrong then carry on calling it out, how that's recieved is down on the person recieveing it.....

Mr

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago


"Fab is such funny old site.

There is this thread, where people are reporting others for sending unsolicited videos and at the same time another thread where women state they enjoy receiving inbox messages from guys taking pictures of their dicks over their photos.

Perhaps we should have tick box to say “Yes, send me pictures” / “No, not send pictures until we have chatted” / “No, don’t send pictures unless I ask”

That way there is no confusion.

But sadly that would entail reading a profile and that's where many men and women (with class or not) fall short.

For me, I consent on this swingers site, not in the real world, for you to send anything, as long as its legal but don't expect me to respond or not delete it or indeed report it.

Liz. X

Very true.

Maybe upon signing up for the site it is made clear that you may receive pic/videos of a naughty (but legal) nature and signing up for this site you are agreeing to this.

Or

Implement a control for a user to blur/block incoming photos/videos.

Plenty of options, I’m sure.

And here - legal.

Cyber flashing isn't legal anymore.

Consent!

Mrs "

As I said, there is another thread going on whereby women say they enjoy receiving inbox photos from guys doing all sorts of things cum tributes etc. They are not explicitly giving consent but It is implicitly assumed because of the very nature of this site.

Options like I have described could help both people who don’t mind receiving that type of content and people who do not.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago

Whether this is a sex site or not consent is still key.

No it shouldn’t be a tickbox on profiles. If you haven’t got the common decency to

Hold a conversation and ask before sending then Jesus Christ

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *endalshaggersCouple
34 weeks ago

Kendal

Probably laugh, delete the message and get on with my day. If the same person does it again, block.

We're all adults.

We're on a sex site looking for fuck buddies predominantly.

There's pictures and videos of loads of users fucking.

Whilst it's maybe not the nicest message to receive, your're on a sex site at the end of the day, its sort of expected to a degree

C xoxo

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nightsoftheCoffeeTableCouple
34 weeks ago

Leeds


"Fab is such funny old site.

There is this thread, where people are reporting others for sending unsolicited videos and at the same time another thread where women state they enjoy receiving inbox messages from guys taking pictures of their dicks over their photos.

Perhaps we should have tick box to say “Yes, send me pictures” / “No, not send pictures until we have chatted” / “No, don’t send pictures unless I ask”

That way there is no confusion.

But sadly that would entail reading a profile and that's where many men and women (with class or not) fall short.

For me, I consent on this swingers site, not in the real world, for you to send anything, as long as its legal but don't expect me to respond or not delete it or indeed report it.

Liz. X

Very true.

Maybe upon signing up for the site it is made clear that you may receive pic/videos of a naughty (but legal) nature and signing up for this site you are agreeing to this.

Or

Implement a control for a user to blur/block incoming photos/videos.

Plenty of options, I’m sure.

And here - legal.

Cyber flashing isn't legal anymore.

Consent!

Mrs

As I said, there is another thread going on whereby women say they enjoy receiving inbox photos from guys doing all sorts of things cum tributes etc. They are not explicitly giving consent but It is implicitly assumed because of the very nature of this site.

Options like I have described could help both people who don’t mind receiving that type of content and people who do not. "

So it's implied I want your cock in my inbox because I'm here that's what your saying?

Mrs

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *abtastic Mr FoxMan
34 weeks ago

A den in the Glen

I can't be bothered to find it on the thread but someone kind of hit the answer earlier I think. Make a tick box indicating whether you consent to receiving pictures or videos unsolicited. Perhaps they appear like they do in Telegram (blurred) and you either delete or view.

No it doesn't stop the person from sending (or maybe it could be developed), but it does stop unwanted viewing.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ris GrayMan
34 weeks ago

Dorchester


"

Women do get thrown out clubs for the same behaviour, consent isn't a gender specific thing now is it. In my experience women tend to ask for consent first. Where as some do not that's men women couples included.

Ask for consent - sex wise?? I would hope they do. I think you are conflating this into a different issue here.

So because filters are there, that justifies and excuses shit behaviour, no your just enabling people's bullshit by saying that. Where is the ownership and accountability for deciding to behave in a certain manner...

Mr

Both women and couples have said they are not offended. Even the OP has said is part of the territory, that this thread has escalated. Unless you want a complete block on sending explicit material, you're going to have to realise you're on an adult site. I've not excused anyone's behaviour, just given perspective.

If you are banning sending explicit video, you are banning unwanted sexual communication ... how you go about wanting sexual communication, opens up a reasonably dull area of "do you consent to sexual chat", "are you offended by sexual content"

This just isn't right though is it.

For a start sexual conversation develops - not heres my cock now let's fuck.

It's a conversation a getting to know each other it develops towards sexual stuff.

Sending a wanking video isn't at all not wanting sexual communication with someone you have got on with and are heading that way with it's a unwanted video in your face.

A random cock/vag in your face from a stranger isn't ok, no matter how you try and phrase it and no in no way does that mean you aren't looking for sex on here.

We should be able to chose who we get sexual conversation with and sexual photos from not some slimy creep that thinks it appropriate to show everyone his/her genitals.

It's not sexy.

Just because some don't mind it doesn't make it right.

I quite like my man's cock does that mean I'm open to all cocks in my face - no! There minging.

Mrs

You've never had a nice pussy message? I've have countless 'how big is your dick', 'I want that cock in my arse", that is a stater mail, if I'm to wrack my brains I could come up with a few more but point being, anyone could receive any message without warning of "good looking tits", find it offensive and report someone.

Receiving an explicit video doesn't limit someone's consent to sexual content, the site itself does, and this is an adult site.

An adult site doesn't change the law & of course I've received those shitty messages, talking sex isn't illegal - cyber flashing is.

I can look at any profile and I choose to view that knowing exactly what maybe on it, that's on me.

Someone sending me a video of them wanking over me is not on me, it's not my choice & it's wrong, simple as.

Mrs "

Just set your settings so they can't send them, sorted, whats the problem. I never send explicit pics or vids but i know this goes on, i always read profiles. I wouldn't be offended by anyone sending me said pics and vids but if i didn't like them i may block them, easy. Its a sex site and it works both ways if you know something and don't want it you have the tools in settings to stop it happening, you can also specify this on your profile.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nightsoftheCoffeeTableCouple
34 weeks ago

Leeds


"

Women do get thrown out clubs for the same behaviour, consent isn't a gender specific thing now is it. In my experience women tend to ask for consent first. Where as some do not that's men women couples included.

Ask for consent - sex wise?? I would hope they do. I think you are conflating this into a different issue here.

So because filters are there, that justifies and excuses shit behaviour, no your just enabling people's bullshit by saying that. Where is the ownership and accountability for deciding to behave in a certain manner...

Mr

Both women and couples have said they are not offended. Even the OP has said is part of the territory, that this thread has escalated. Unless you want a complete block on sending explicit material, you're going to have to realise you're on an adult site. I've not excused anyone's behaviour, just given perspective.

If you are banning sending explicit video, you are banning unwanted sexual communication ... how you go about wanting sexual communication, opens up a reasonably dull area of "do you consent to sexual chat", "are you offended by sexual content"

This just isn't right though is it.

For a start sexual conversation develops - not heres my cock now let's fuck.

It's a conversation a getting to know each other it develops towards sexual stuff.

Sending a wanking video isn't at all not wanting sexual communication with someone you have got on with and are heading that way with it's a unwanted video in your face.

A random cock/vag in your face from a stranger isn't ok, no matter how you try and phrase it and no in no way does that mean you aren't looking for sex on here.

We should be able to chose who we get sexual conversation with and sexual photos from not some slimy creep that thinks it appropriate to show everyone his/her genitals.

It's not sexy.

Just because some don't mind it doesn't make it right.

I quite like my man's cock does that mean I'm open to all cocks in my face - no! There minging.

Mrs

You've never had a nice pussy message? I've have countless 'how big is your dick', 'I want that cock in my arse", that is a stater mail, if I'm to wrack my brains I could come up with a few more but point being, anyone could receive any message without warning of "good looking tits", find it offensive and report someone.

Receiving an explicit video doesn't limit someone's consent to sexual content, the site itself does, and this is an adult site.

An adult site doesn't change the law & of course I've received those shitty messages, talking sex isn't illegal - cyber flashing is.

I can look at any profile and I choose to view that knowing exactly what maybe on it, that's on me.

Someone sending me a video of them wanking over me is not on me, it's not my choice & it's wrong, simple as.

Mrs Just set your settings so they can't send them, sorted, whats the problem. I never send explicit pics or vids but i know this goes on, i always read profiles. I wouldn't be offended by anyone sending me said pics and vids but if i didn't like them i may block them, easy. Its a sex site and it works both ways if you know something and don't want it you have the tools in settings to stop it happening, you can also specify this on your profile. "

It's very much specified we don't even meet men they have a huge warning when they message yet they ignore it, why should I stop all conversation because of the ignorance of others?

Mrs

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ris GrayMan
34 weeks ago

Dorchester


"

Women do get thrown out clubs for the same behaviour, consent isn't a gender specific thing now is it. In my experience women tend to ask for consent first. Where as some do not that's men women couples included.

Ask for consent - sex wise?? I would hope they do. I think you are conflating this into a different issue here.

So because filters are there, that justifies and excuses shit behaviour, no your just enabling people's bullshit by saying that. Where is the ownership and accountability for deciding to behave in a certain manner...

Mr

Both women and couples have said they are not offended. Even the OP has said is part of the territory, that this thread has escalated. Unless you want a complete block on sending explicit material, you're going to have to realise you're on an adult site. I've not excused anyone's behaviour, just given perspective.

If you are banning sending explicit video, you are banning unwanted sexual communication ... how you go about wanting sexual communication, opens up a reasonably dull area of "do you consent to sexual chat", "are you offended by sexual content"

This just isn't right though is it.

For a start sexual conversation develops - not heres my cock now let's fuck.

It's a conversation a getting to know each other it develops towards sexual stuff.

Sending a wanking video isn't at all not wanting sexual communication with someone you have got on with and are heading that way with it's a unwanted video in your face.

A random cock/vag in your face from a stranger isn't ok, no matter how you try and phrase it and no in no way does that mean you aren't looking for sex on here.

We should be able to chose who we get sexual conversation with and sexual photos from not some slimy creep that thinks it appropriate to show everyone his/her genitals.

It's not sexy.

Just because some don't mind it doesn't make it right.

I quite like my man's cock does that mean I'm open to all cocks in my face - no! There minging.

Mrs

You've never had a nice pussy message? I've have countless 'how big is your dick', 'I want that cock in my arse", that is a stater mail, if I'm to wrack my brains I could come up with a few more but point being, anyone could receive any message without warning of "good looking tits", find it offensive and report someone.

Receiving an explicit video doesn't limit someone's consent to sexual content, the site itself does, and this is an adult site.

An adult site doesn't change the law & of course I've received those shitty messages, talking sex isn't illegal - cyber flashing is.

I can look at any profile and I choose to view that knowing exactly what maybe on it, that's on me.

Someone sending me a video of them wanking over me is not on me, it's not my choice & it's wrong, simple as.

Mrs Just set your settings so they can't send them, sorted, whats the problem. I never send explicit pics or vids but i know this goes on, i always read profiles. I wouldn't be offended by anyone sending me said pics and vids but if i didn't like them i may block them, easy. Its a sex site and it works both ways if you know something and don't want it you have the tools in settings to stop it happening, you can also specify this on your profile.

It's very much specified we don't even meet men they have a huge warning when they message yet they ignore it, why should I stop all conversation because of the ignorance of others?

Mrs "

No i think you can stop just images /vids

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nightsoftheCoffeeTableCouple
34 weeks ago

Leeds


"

Women do get thrown out clubs for the same behaviour, consent isn't a gender specific thing now is it. In my experience women tend to ask for consent first. Where as some do not that's men women couples included.

Ask for consent - sex wise?? I would hope they do. I think you are conflating this into a different issue here.

So because filters are there, that justifies and excuses shit behaviour, no your just enabling people's bullshit by saying that. Where is the ownership and accountability for deciding to behave in a certain manner...

Mr

Both women and couples have said they are not offended. Even the OP has said is part of the territory, that this thread has escalated. Unless you want a complete block on sending explicit material, you're going to have to realise you're on an adult site. I've not excused anyone's behaviour, just given perspective.

If you are banning sending explicit video, you are banning unwanted sexual communication ... how you go about wanting sexual communication, opens up a reasonably dull area of "do you consent to sexual chat", "are you offended by sexual content"

This just isn't right though is it.

For a start sexual conversation develops - not heres my cock now let's fuck.

It's a conversation a getting to know each other it develops towards sexual stuff.

Sending a wanking video isn't at all not wanting sexual communication with someone you have got on with and are heading that way with it's a unwanted video in your face.

A random cock/vag in your face from a stranger isn't ok, no matter how you try and phrase it and no in no way does that mean you aren't looking for sex on here.

We should be able to chose who we get sexual conversation with and sexual photos from not some slimy creep that thinks it appropriate to show everyone his/her genitals.

It's not sexy.

Just because some don't mind it doesn't make it right.

I quite like my man's cock does that mean I'm open to all cocks in my face - no! There minging.

Mrs

You've never had a nice pussy message? I've have countless 'how big is your dick', 'I want that cock in my arse", that is a stater mail, if I'm to wrack my brains I could come up with a few more but point being, anyone could receive any message without warning of "good looking tits", find it offensive and report someone.

Receiving an explicit video doesn't limit someone's consent to sexual content, the site itself does, and this is an adult site.

An adult site doesn't change the law & of course I've received those shitty messages, talking sex isn't illegal - cyber flashing is.

I can look at any profile and I choose to view that knowing exactly what maybe on it, that's on me.

Someone sending me a video of them wanking over me is not on me, it's not my choice & it's wrong, simple as.

Mrs Just set your settings so they can't send them, sorted, whats the problem. I never send explicit pics or vids but i know this goes on, i always read profiles. I wouldn't be offended by anyone sending me said pics and vids but if i didn't like them i may block them, easy. Its a sex site and it works both ways if you know something and don't want it you have the tools in settings to stop it happening, you can also specify this on your profile.

It's very much specified we don't even meet men they have a huge warning when they message yet they ignore it, why should I stop all conversation because of the ignorance of others?

Mrs No i think you can stop just images /vids "

Why, I like viewing pics that I want to view, just because people push their genitals into others faces I should stop using the site as I please?

No, people on a sex site of all places should understand consent.

Mrs

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago


"Fab is such funny old site.

There is this thread, where people are reporting others for sending unsolicited videos and at the same time another thread where women state they enjoy receiving inbox messages from guys taking pictures of their dicks over their photos.

Perhaps we should have tick box to say “Yes, send me pictures” / “No, not send pictures until we have chatted” / “No, don’t send pictures unless I ask”

That way there is no confusion.

But sadly that would entail reading a profile and that's where many men and women (with class or not) fall short.

For me, I consent on this swingers site, not in the real world, for you to send anything, as long as its legal but don't expect me to respond or not delete it or indeed report it.

Liz. X

Very true.

Maybe upon signing up for the site it is made clear that you may receive pic/videos of a naughty (but legal) nature and signing up for this site you are agreeing to this.

Or

Implement a control for a user to blur/block incoming photos/videos.

Plenty of options, I’m sure.

And here - legal.

Cyber flashing isn't legal anymore.

Consent!

Mrs

As I said, there is another thread going on whereby women say they enjoy receiving inbox photos from guys doing all sorts of things cum tributes etc. They are not explicitly giving consent but It is implicitly assumed because of the very nature of this site.

Options like I have described could help both people who don’t mind receiving that type of content and people who do not.

So it's implied I want your cock in my inbox because I'm here that's what your saying?

Mrs "

No, of course it isn’t. Clearly you didn’t read what I wrote, did you. If you did, you wouldn’t have replied with that ridiculous rebuttal.

I’ll write it again, a little differently so you can understand. Check the forums, there are threads going on right now where women say they enjoy receiving those type of photos, who have not explicitly stated they want them. We can cater for both women who do and do not want to receive that content unless they have asked for it.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nightsoftheCoffeeTableCouple
34 weeks ago

Leeds


"Fab is such funny old site.

There is this thread, where people are reporting others for sending unsolicited videos and at the same time another thread where women state they enjoy receiving inbox messages from guys taking pictures of their dicks over their photos.

Perhaps we should have tick box to say “Yes, send me pictures” / “No, not send pictures until we have chatted” / “No, don’t send pictures unless I ask”

That way there is no confusion.

But sadly that would entail reading a profile and that's where many men and women (with class or not) fall short.

For me, I consent on this swingers site, not in the real world, for you to send anything, as long as its legal but don't expect me to respond or not delete it or indeed report it.

Liz. X

Very true.

Maybe upon signing up for the site it is made clear that you may receive pic/videos of a naughty (but legal) nature and signing up for this site you are agreeing to this.

Or

Implement a control for a user to blur/block incoming photos/videos.

Plenty of options, I’m sure.

And here - legal.

Cyber flashing isn't legal anymore.

Consent!

Mrs

As I said, there is another thread going on whereby women say they enjoy receiving inbox photos from guys doing all sorts of things cum tributes etc. They are not explicitly giving consent but It is implicitly assumed because of the very nature of this site.

Options like I have described could help both people who don’t mind receiving that type of content and people who do not.

So it's implied I want your cock in my inbox because I'm here that's what your saying?

Mrs

No, of course it isn’t. Clearly you didn’t read what I wrote, did you. If you did, you wouldn’t have replied with that ridiculous rebuttal.

I’ll write it again, a little differently so you can understand. Check the forums, there are threads going on right now where women say they enjoy receiving those type of photos, who have not explicitly stated they want them. We can cater for both women who do and do not want to receive that content unless they have asked for it.

"

Do you understand a ? That's me asking the question so I can understand.

The woman who like them and consent to them all good, that's not what this thread is about though is it.

As you said consent.

Mrs

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ris GrayMan
34 weeks ago

Dorchester


"

Women do get thrown out clubs for the same behaviour, consent isn't a gender specific thing now is it. In my experience women tend to ask for consent first. Where as some do not that's men women couples included.

Ask for consent - sex wise?? I would hope they do. I think you are conflating this into a different issue here.

So because filters are there, that justifies and excuses shit behaviour, no your just enabling people's bullshit by saying that. Where is the ownership and accountability for deciding to behave in a certain manner...

Mr

Both women and couples have said they are not offended. Even the OP has said is part of the territory, that this thread has escalated. Unless you want a complete block on sending explicit material, you're going to have to realise you're on an adult site. I've not excused anyone's behaviour, just given perspective.

If you are banning sending explicit video, you are banning unwanted sexual communication ... how you go about wanting sexual communication, opens up a reasonably dull area of "do you consent to sexual chat", "are you offended by sexual content"

This just isn't right though is it.

For a start sexual conversation develops - not heres my cock now let's fuck.

It's a conversation a getting to know each other it develops towards sexual stuff.

Sending a wanking video isn't at all not wanting sexual communication with someone you have got on with and are heading that way with it's a unwanted video in your face.

A random cock/vag in your face from a stranger isn't ok, no matter how you try and phrase it and no in no way does that mean you aren't looking for sex on here.

We should be able to chose who we get sexual conversation with and sexual photos from not some slimy creep that thinks it appropriate to show everyone his/her genitals.

It's not sexy.

Just because some don't mind it doesn't make it right.

I quite like my man's cock does that mean I'm open to all cocks in my face - no! There minging.

Mrs

You've never had a nice pussy message? I've have countless 'how big is your dick', 'I want that cock in my arse", that is a stater mail, if I'm to wrack my brains I could come up with a few more but point being, anyone could receive any message without warning of "good looking tits", find it offensive and report someone.

Receiving an explicit video doesn't limit someone's consent to sexual content, the site itself does, and this is an adult site.

An adult site doesn't change the law & of course I've received those shitty messages, talking sex isn't illegal - cyber flashing is.

I can look at any profile and I choose to view that knowing exactly what maybe on it, that's on me.

Someone sending me a video of them wanking over me is not on me, it's not my choice & it's wrong, simple as.

Mrs Just set your settings so they can't send them, sorted, whats the problem. I never send explicit pics or vids but i know this goes on, i always read profiles. I wouldn't be offended by anyone sending me said pics and vids but if i didn't like them i may block them, easy. Its a sex site and it works both ways if you know something and don't want it you have the tools in settings to stop it happening, you can also specify this on your profile.

It's very much specified we don't even meet men they have a huge warning when they message yet they ignore it, why should I stop all conversation because of the ignorance of others?

Mrs No i think you can stop just images /vids

Why, I like viewing pics that I want to view, just because people push their genitals into others faces I should stop using the site as I please?

No, people on a sex site of all places should understand consent.

Mrs "

Well it would seem you can hide all site images but nothing in between so i guess maybe that isn't an option.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nightsoftheCoffeeTableCouple
34 weeks ago

Leeds


"Fab is such funny old site.

There is this thread, where people are reporting others for sending unsolicited videos and at the same time another thread where women state they enjoy receiving inbox messages from guys taking pictures of their dicks over their photos.

Perhaps we should have tick box to say “Yes, send me pictures” / “No, not send pictures until we have chatted” / “No, don’t send pictures unless I ask”

That way there is no confusion.

But sadly that would entail reading a profile and that's where many men and women (with class or not) fall short.

For me, I consent on this swingers site, not in the real world, for you to send anything, as long as its legal but don't expect me to respond or not delete it or indeed report it.

Liz. X

Very true.

Maybe upon signing up for the site it is made clear that you may receive pic/videos of a naughty (but legal) nature and signing up for this site you are agreeing to this.

Or

Implement a control for a user to blur/block incoming photos/videos.

Plenty of options, I’m sure.

And here - legal.

Cyber flashing isn't legal anymore.

Consent!

Mrs

As I said, there is another thread going on whereby women say they enjoy receiving inbox photos from guys doing all sorts of things cum tributes etc. They are not explicitly giving consent but It is implicitly assumed because of the very nature of this site.

Options like I have described could help both people who don’t mind receiving that type of content and people who do not.

So it's implied I want your cock in my inbox because I'm here that's what your saying?

Mrs

No, of course it isn’t. Clearly you didn’t read what I wrote, did you. If you did, you wouldn’t have replied with that ridiculous rebuttal.

I’ll write it again, a little differently so you can understand. Check the forums, there are threads going on right now where women say they enjoy receiving those type of photos, who have not explicitly stated they want them. We can cater for both women who do and do not want to receive that content unless they have asked for it.

Do you understand a ? That's me asking the question so I can understand.

The woman who like them and consent to them all good, that's not what this thread is about though is it.

As you said consent.

Mrs "

Just to quote yourself "They are not explicitly giving consent but It is implicitly assumed because of the very nature of this site" is a load of bollocks.

Being here I do not imply consent for your cock in my inbox

Mrs

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ris GrayMan
34 weeks ago

Dorchester

You can however block all males from messaging but can contact males you are interested in which then in turn allows them to message you.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *orny-DJMan
34 weeks ago

Leigh-on-Sea

It's worth remembering that someone was recently prosecuted for sending such unsolicited images on social media.

Many may be of the assumption that the laws concerning such behaviour don't apply here because of the nature of the site, however, I disagree, and, more importantly, I would imagine that the law would also disagree and it all comes down to that most important issue that is 'consent' - which everyone using fab should be more than well aware of.

Having such pictures on your profile is one thing, and largely accepted but sending someone such images that they haven't asked for is completely different.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *inkyropecoupleCouple
34 weeks ago

carluke


"It's worth remembering that someone was recently prosecuted for sending such unsolicited images on social media.

Many may be of the assumption that the laws concerning such behaviour don't apply here because of the nature of the site, however, I disagree, and, more importantly, I would imagine that the law would also disagree and it all comes down to that most important issue that is 'consent' - which everyone using fab should be more than well aware of.

Having such pictures on your profile is one thing, and largely accepted but sending someone such images that they haven't asked for is completely different.

"

Well said

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nightsoftheCoffeeTableCouple
34 weeks ago

Leeds


"It's worth remembering that someone was recently prosecuted for sending such unsolicited images on social media.

Many may be of the assumption that the laws concerning such behaviour don't apply here because of the nature of the site, however, I disagree, and, more importantly, I would imagine that the law would also disagree and it all comes down to that most important issue that is 'consent' - which everyone using fab should be more than well aware of.

Having such pictures on your profile is one thing, and largely accepted but sending someone such images that they haven't asked for is completely different.

"

Very well said, this site isn't exempt from the law.

Mrs

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago


"Fab is such funny old site.

There is this thread, where people are reporting others for sending unsolicited videos and at the same time another thread where women state they enjoy receiving inbox messages from guys taking pictures of their dicks over their photos.

Perhaps we should have tick box to say “Yes, send me pictures” / “No, not send pictures until we have chatted” / “No, don’t send pictures unless I ask”

That way there is no confusion.

But sadly that would entail reading a profile and that's where many men and women (with class or not) fall short.

For me, I consent on this swingers site, not in the real world, for you to send anything, as long as its legal but don't expect me to respond or not delete it or indeed report it.

Liz. X

Very true.

Maybe upon signing up for the site it is made clear that you may receive pic/videos of a naughty (but legal) nature and signing up for this site you are agreeing to this.

Or

Implement a control for a user to blur/block incoming photos/videos.

Plenty of options, I’m sure.

And here - legal.

Cyber flashing isn't legal anymore.

Consent!

Mrs

As I said, there is another thread going on whereby women say they enjoy receiving inbox photos from guys doing all sorts of things cum tributes etc. They are not explicitly giving consent but It is implicitly assumed because of the very nature of this site.

Options like I have described could help both people who don’t mind receiving that type of content and people who do not.

So it's implied I want your cock in my inbox because I'm here that's what your saying?

Mrs

No, of course it isn’t. Clearly you didn’t read what I wrote, did you. If you did, you wouldn’t have replied with that ridiculous rebuttal.

I’ll write it again, a little differently so you can understand. Check the forums, there are threads going on right now where women say they enjoy receiving those type of photos, who have not explicitly stated they want them. We can cater for both women who do and do not want to receive that content unless they have asked for it.

Do you understand a ? That's me asking the question so I can understand.

The woman who like them and consent to them all good, that's not what this thread is about though is it.

As you said consent.

Mrs

Just to quote yourself "They are not explicitly giving consent but It is implicitly assumed because of the very nature of this site" is a load of bollocks.

Being here I do not imply consent for your cock in my inbox

Mrs "

You’ve taken that small potion and quoted it without all the additional context, though. Wet disingenuous.

One more time because I know you’re trying very hard to push back on anyone who disagrees with you.

SOME women, as evidence by forum posts, DO NOT explicitly give consent but like getting photos and videos. They DO NOT spell this out in their bio or in the forums because, presumably, they understand it’s implicitly assumed reasonable due to the nature of the site. Others, like yourself do not want cocks in their inbox, therefore you need to explicitly tell people not to.

If we had a technical control in place, like a blurring feature that a user could control to prevent those pictures/videos being seen within the inbox we could cater for people who DO NOT EXPLICITLY have to tell people or ‘care’ - for a lack of a better word - about their preference vs those who do.

An administrative control such as a box to tick saying “yes, I want to see your dicks in my inbox” could work I’m and if they break these trust they could be kicked off the site and face prosecution.

I’m all for catering for everyone. People who don’t mind and don’t need to spell it out and those who do.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago


"I ….

…..

I hear that, but if one person who sees it being called out, and realises that it’s not okay, or that people are not alright with it. And they then amend their behaviour going forward. Then that's a success right.

I'd ask yourself the question Woody, why does it bother you so much?

.....

Mr "

I can answer that.

I play online gaming, (stay with me here)

Often when playing online, somebody somewhere has found an exploit in that game where is they can do a certain thing a certain way and they’re able to win or score or shoot you every time. It’s a glitch.

I won’t do it because I like to play fairly, but there are some people out there that will do it every single time knowing it will piss you off. Which means there are some wankers who will exploit the game and they get off on it.

And I often use the words ‘hate the game, not the player!’ Because it doesn’t quite work with what this thread is about,

I play by the rules because I have integrity and morals….. as a gamer….. and also by being on Fab and respecting other people. but some people don’t, and that’s why they patch those glitches.

Does that even make sense?

haha.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago

Oops a few typos there (silly autocorrect)

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ebauchedDeviantsPt2Couple
34 weeks ago

Cumbria


"If someone sent you an unsolicited wank video of the back of a totally unrelated forum post, how would you react ? Is reporting such a thing overreacting? I don't appreciate the gamut of cock picks but now it's a live one I like it even less ! I've blocked and yes I reported ! Am I being a prude lol. ! "

Report and block.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ouples_EroticaXXXCouple
34 weeks ago

manchester


"Fab is such funny old site.

There is this thread, where people are reporting others for sending unsolicited videos and at the same time another thread where women state they enjoy receiving inbox messages from guys taking pictures of their dicks over their photos.

Perhaps we should have tick box to say “Yes, send me pictures” / “No, not send pictures until we have chatted” / “No, don’t send pictures unless I ask”

That way there is no confusion.

But sadly that would entail reading a profile and that's where many men and women (with class or not) fall short.

For me, I consent on this swingers site, not in the real world, for you to send anything, as long as its legal but don't expect me to respond or not delete it or indeed report it.

Liz. X

Very true.

Maybe upon signing up for the site it is made clear that you may receive pic/videos of a naughty (but legal) nature and signing up for this site you are agreeing to this.

Or

Implement a control for a user to blur/block incoming photos/videos.

Plenty of options, I’m sure.

And here - legal.

Cyber flashing isn't legal anymore.

Consent!

Mrs

As I said, there is another thread going on whereby women say they enjoy receiving inbox photos from guys doing all sorts of things cum tributes etc. They are not explicitly giving consent but It is implicitly assumed because of the very nature of this site.

Options like I have described could help both people who don’t mind receiving that type of content and people who do not.

So it's implied I want your cock in my inbox because I'm here that's what your saying?

Mrs

No, of course it isn’t. Clearly you didn’t read what I wrote, did you. If you did, you wouldn’t have replied with that ridiculous rebuttal.

I’ll write it again, a little differently so you can understand. Check the forums, there are threads going on right now where women say they enjoy receiving those type of photos, who have not explicitly stated they want them. We can cater for both women who do and do not want to receive that content unless they have asked for it.

Do you understand a ? That's me asking the question so I can understand.

The woman who like them and consent to them all good, that's not what this thread is about though is it.

As you said consent.

Mrs

Just to quote yourself "They are not explicitly giving consent but It is implicitly assumed because of the very nature of this site" is a load of bollocks.

Being here I do not imply consent for your cock in my inbox

Mrs

You’ve taken that small potion and quoted it without all the additional context, though. Wet disingenuous.

One more time because I know you’re trying very hard to push back on anyone who disagrees with you.

SOME women, as evidence by forum posts, DO NOT explicitly give consent but like getting photos and videos. They DO NOT spell this out in their bio or in the forums because, presumably, they understand it’s implicitly assumed reasonable due to the nature of the site. Others, like yourself do not want cocks in their inbox, therefore you need to explicitly tell people not to.

If we had a technical control in place, like a blurring feature that a user could control to prevent those pictures/videos being seen within the inbox we could cater for people who DO NOT EXPLICITLY have to tell people or ‘care’ - for a lack of a better word - about their preference vs those who do.

An administrative control such as a box to tick saying “yes, I want to see your dicks in my inbox” could work I’m and if they break these trust they could be kicked off the site and face prosecution.

I’m all for catering for everyone. People who don’t mind and don’t need to spell it out and those who do. "

Consent is never implied it can only be explicitly given!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago

Tell that to the women on here that say they enjoy receiving them who have not explicitly stated as such.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nightsoftheCoffeeTableCouple
34 weeks ago

Leeds


"Fab is such funny old site.

There is this thread, where people are reporting others for sending unsolicited videos and at the same time another thread where women state they enjoy receiving inbox messages from guys taking pictures of their dicks over their photos.

Perhaps we should have tick box to say “Yes, send me pictures” / “No, not send pictures until we have chatted” / “No, don’t send pictures unless I ask”

That way there is no confusion.

But sadly that would entail reading a profile and that's where many men and women (with class or not) fall short.

For me, I consent on this swingers site, not in the real world, for you to send anything, as long as its legal but don't expect me to respond or not delete it or indeed report it.

Liz. X

Very true.

Maybe upon signing up for the site it is made clear that you may receive pic/videos of a naughty (but legal) nature and signing up for this site you are agreeing to this.

Or

Implement a control for a user to blur/block incoming photos/videos.

Plenty of options, I’m sure.

And here - legal.

Cyber flashing isn't legal anymore.

Consent!

Mrs

As I said, there is another thread going on whereby women say they enjoy receiving inbox photos from guys doing all sorts of things cum tributes etc. They are not explicitly giving consent but It is implicitly assumed because of the very nature of this site.

Options like I have described could help both people who don’t mind receiving that type of content and people who do not.

So it's implied I want your cock in my inbox because I'm here that's what your saying?

Mrs

No, of course it isn’t. Clearly you didn’t read what I wrote, did you. If you did, you wouldn’t have replied with that ridiculous rebuttal.

I’ll write it again, a little differently so you can understand. Check the forums, there are threads going on right now where women say they enjoy receiving those type of photos, who have not explicitly stated they want them. We can cater for both women who do and do not want to receive that content unless they have asked for it.

Do you understand a ? That's me asking the question so I can understand.

The woman who like them and consent to them all good, that's not what this thread is about though is it.

As you said consent.

Mrs

Just to quote yourself "They are not explicitly giving consent but It is implicitly assumed because of the very nature of this site" is a load of bollocks.

Being here I do not imply consent for your cock in my inbox

Mrs

You’ve taken that small potion and quoted it without all the additional context, though. Wet disingenuous.

One more time because I know you’re trying very hard to push back on anyone who disagrees with you.

SOME women, as evidence by forum posts, DO NOT explicitly give consent but like getting photos and videos. They DO NOT spell this out in their bio or in the forums because, presumably, they understand it’s implicitly assumed reasonable due to the nature of the site. Others, like yourself do not want cocks in their inbox, therefore you need to explicitly tell people not to.

If we had a technical control in place, like a blurring feature that a user could control to prevent those pictures/videos being seen within the inbox we could cater for people who DO NOT EXPLICITLY have to tell people or ‘care’ - for a lack of a better word - about their preference vs those who do.

An administrative control such as a box to tick saying “yes, I want to see your dicks in my inbox” could work I’m and if they break these trust they could be kicked off the site and face prosecution.

I’m all for catering for everyone. People who don’t mind and don’t need to spell it out and those who do. "

let's get all shouty shall we I DO NOTE IN MY PROFILE TWICE I don't want to see your cock I ALSO DONT MEET MEN! Where have I implied that's ok.

No not one person on here implies consent because they are here or because they posted on a forum, just because there ok with some cocks doesn't mean they want ANYONE'S cock.

If people wanna see it they'll ask.

WHY IS IT SO HARD NOT TO FLASH YOUR COCK AT STRANGERS?

is that better.

Mrs

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago


"Oops a few typos there (silly autocorrect)"

Welcome to my life mate

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *orny-DJMan
34 weeks ago

Leigh-on-Sea


"Tell that to the women on here that say they enjoy receiving them who have not explicitly stated as such."

Do let us know how you get on using that defence in court

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago


"Fab is such funny old site.

There is this thread, where people are reporting others for sending unsolicited videos and at the same time another thread where women state they enjoy receiving inbox messages from guys taking pictures of their dicks over their photos.

Perhaps we should have tick box to say “Yes, send me pictures” / “No, not send pictures until we have chatted” / “No, don’t send pictures unless I ask”

That way there is no confusion.

But sadly that would entail reading a profile and that's where many men and women (with class or not) fall short.

For me, I consent on this swingers site, not in the real world, for you to send anything, as long as its legal but don't expect me to respond or not delete it or indeed report it.

Liz. X

Very true.

Maybe upon signing up for the site it is made clear that you may receive pic/videos of a naughty (but legal) nature and signing up for this site you are agreeing to this.

Or

Implement a control for a user to blur/block incoming photos/videos.

Plenty of options, I’m sure.

And here - legal.

Cyber flashing isn't legal anymore.

Consent!

Mrs

As I said, there is another thread going on whereby women say they enjoy receiving inbox photos from guys doing all sorts of things cum tributes etc. They are not explicitly giving consent but It is implicitly assumed because of the very nature of this site.

Options like I have described could help both people who don’t mind receiving that type of content and people who do not.

So it's implied I want your cock in my inbox because I'm here that's what your saying?

Mrs

No, of course it isn’t. Clearly you didn’t read what I wrote, did you. If you did, you wouldn’t have replied with that ridiculous rebuttal.

I’ll write it again, a little differently so you can understand. Check the forums, there are threads going on right now where women say they enjoy receiving those type of photos, who have not explicitly stated they want them. We can cater for both women who do and do not want to receive that content unless they have asked for it.

Do you understand a ? That's me asking the question so I can understand.

The woman who like them and consent to them all good, that's not what this thread is about though is it.

As you said consent.

Mrs

Just to quote yourself "They are not explicitly giving consent but It is implicitly assumed because of the very nature of this site" is a load of bollocks.

Being here I do not imply consent for your cock in my inbox

Mrs

You’ve taken that small potion and quoted it without all the additional context, though. Wet disingenuous.

One more time because I know you’re trying very hard to push back on anyone who disagrees with you.

SOME women, as evidence by forum posts, DO NOT explicitly give consent but like getting photos and videos. They DO NOT spell this out in their bio or in the forums because, presumably, they understand it’s implicitly assumed reasonable due to the nature of the site. Others, like yourself do not want cocks in their inbox, therefore you need to explicitly tell people not to.

If we had a technical control in place, like a blurring feature that a user could control to prevent those pictures/videos being seen within the inbox we could cater for people who DO NOT EXPLICITLY have to tell people or ‘care’ - for a lack of a better word - about their preference vs those who do.

An administrative control such as a box to tick saying “yes, I want to see your dicks in my inbox” could work I’m and if they break these trust they could be kicked off the site and face prosecution.

I’m all for catering for everyone. People who don’t mind and don’t need to spell it out and those who do.

let's get all shouty shall we I DO NOTE IN MY PROFILE TWICE I don't want to see your cock I ALSO DONT MEET MEN! Where have I implied that's ok.

No not one person on here implies consent because they are here or because they posted on a forum, just because there ok with some cocks doesn't mean they want ANYONE'S cock.

If people wanna see it they'll ask.

WHY IS IT SO HARD NOT TO FLASH YOUR COCK AT STRANGERS?

is that better.

Mrs "

How hard is it you to see this it not about you and you do not represent all women. There’s women evidently who do not care and those who do AND that we could cater for all.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago


"Tell that to the women on here that say they enjoy receiving them who have not explicitly stated as such.

Do let us know how you get on using that defence in court"

I how this gets you a dm, mate. Little pat on the back you need.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago


"…..

….

WHY IS IT SO HARD NOT TO FLASH YOUR COCK AT STRANGERS?

….

Mrs "

Narrator- Woody hovers his finger above the post button for a long time, considering the shouting nature of Mrs coffee, after a while, he decides not to post the childish joke about [……… ]…..

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago


"Tell that to the women on here that say they enjoy receiving them who have not explicitly stated as such.

Do let us know how you get on using that defence in court

I how this gets you a dm, mate. Little pat on the back you need. "

Some women like it, the key word being ‘some’

Isn’t really that difficult for people to understand, that most women do not want to see your dick?

I honestly despair, at the lack of knowledge of basic fucking consent on this site.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ebauchedDeviantsPt2Couple
34 weeks ago

Cumbria


"Tell that to the women on here that say they enjoy receiving them who have not explicitly stated as such."

The thing about consent is that it’s specific and contextual. Just because a woman says she liked it when Mr X showed her his cock it doesn’t mean that she wants you to show her your cock. It means she liked it when Mr X showed her his.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *assy LassieWoman
34 weeks ago

Lanarkshire


"If someone sent you an unsolicited wank video of the back of a totally unrelated forum post, how would you react ? Is reporting such a thing overreacting? I don't appreciate the gamut of cock picks but now it's a live one I like it even less ! I've blocked and yes I reported ! Am I being a prude lol. !

Yeah, you probably are over reacting a little bit, given this is a site largely dedicated to having sex with strangers, regardless of all the talk of connections. "

Really! Even on a site like this consent should still be a given. And yes it's still illegal on here to private message with unsolicited sex pics.

Just because the platform is a bit more risky than fb etc doesn't mean consent goes out the window!!!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *he turned me GreyCouple
34 weeks ago

Warwick and Coventry


"I ….

…..

I hear that, but if one person who sees it being called out, and realises that it’s not okay, or that people are not alright with it. And they then amend their behaviour going forward. Then that's a success right.

I'd ask yourself the question Woody, why does it bother you so much?

.....

Mr

I can answer that.

I play online gaming, (stay with me here)

Often when playing online, somebody somewhere has found an exploit in that game where is they can do a certain thing a certain way and they’re able to win or score or shoot you every time. It’s a glitch.

I won’t do it because I like to play fairly, but there are some people out there that will do it every single time knowing it will piss you off. Which means there are some wankers who will exploit the game and they get off on it.

And I often use the words ‘hate the game, not the player!’ Because it doesn’t quite work with what this thread is about,

I play by the rules because I have integrity and morals….. as a gamer….. and also by being on Fab and respecting other people. but some people don’t, and that’s why they patch those glitches.

Does that even make sense?

haha. "

It makes perfect sense Woody..

As a gamer you only have your own dignity, self-respect and integrity. And you keep that intact by playing by the rules and fair.

So, I pick up it's a felt sense of injustice...

Mr

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ackformore100Man
34 weeks ago

Tin town

Mr angry is in the room.. Or Mrs angry..

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago

Let's make it easy for the ppl in the room that aren't quite understanding.

Before you send a pic or video of your pride and joy, ask if the person wants to see. Yes we all have pics on display, and that's everyone's choice. Same as its our choice what we look at on ppls profiles. But a knob pic in a message, we have no choice on viewing, it's there, staring at us. So ask first, and respect the response

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ex HolesMan
34 weeks ago

Up North

Would anyone like a dick pic?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *assy LassieWoman
34 weeks ago

Lanarkshire


"Did you watch it?

Report it and see what happens! I’ve had unsolicited pictures (not videos) and I’ve just deleted them and got on with my life.

Like people always pointed out on here, a message in your inbox is just junk mail

Yeah and a guy showing you his penis in the street is just a friendly greeting, right?

No. Because that’s in the street

And I didn’t say it was alright, or a friendly greeting in here either.

But it’s not “just junk mail” and more than a guy putting Polaroids of his penis through your letterbox is “just junk mail.”

We should all start reporting these graphic unwanted images. Strangely the thread I started suggesting people do that got removed by admin.

Look. Here is my view.

If I was on a knitting, I would expect my junk mail would be other people showing me what knitted , a jumper, gloves, et cetera. Maybe even somebody trying to sell me new yarn.

But I’m on a sex website, where peoples avatars a cock pics and vaginas and gaping arseholes.

So I would expect my junk mail to be something similar.

So I refer to it a junk mail whether it’s right or wrong to send a dick pic or tits into somebody’s inbox, is subjective. Because I know some people on here are here for that.

Don’t try to twist it to say I’m (or others) are alright with it, or I do it.

The thing is, every time that I post on the forums about how we should report these messages or that it’s just wrong to send them, I get messages from male people, that are bordering on abusive, about how basically I shouldn’t be on a swing site if I can’t cope with men sending images of their genitals to my *private* inbox.

And every time a guy on the forums is like “meh just delete it” although he’s saying it with good intentions, what these abusive guys are hearing is “these men all support me and I am in the right for feeling entitled to enter women’s *private* inboxes with pictures of my genitals.”

It’s like when you’re in the pub and one of the lads tells a sexist joke. If everyone just stays silent he doesn’t think he’s wrong. It’s the bystander effect and it gives him the confidence to do it again. If everyone around him (especially fellow men) said “actually mate, that’s not ok” we might actually make some progress.

I don't have a penis, I swear.

But I'm also fully aware of where I am and I know the kind of things men will send. And yeah, that's never gonna change.

I don't think anyone is saying it's fine, but jeez if I was so offended at seeing a penis I'd do something about it. Block men, hide images, look at my phone behind my fingers etc.

Also, you cannot compare fab to getting images in everyday life.

"

I don't think it's really about offence being taken but rather more the entitlement being displayed...quite literally

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
34 weeks ago


"I ….

…..

I hear that, but if one person who sees it being called out, and realises that it’s not okay, or that people are not alright with it. And they then amend their behaviour going forward. Then that's a success right.

I'd ask yourself the question Woody, why does it bother you so much?

.....

Mr

I can answer that.

I play online gaming, (stay with me here)

Often when playing online, somebody somewhere has found an exploit in that game where is they can do a certain thing a certain way and they’re able to win or score or shoot you every time. It’s a glitch.

I won’t do it because I like to play fairly, but there are some people out there that will do it every single time knowing it will piss you off. Which means there are some wankers who will exploit the game and they get off on it.

And I often use the words ‘hate the game, not the player!’ Because it doesn’t quite work with what this thread is about,

I play by the rules because I have integrity and morals….. as a gamer….. and also by being on Fab and respecting other people. but some people don’t, and that’s why they patch those glitches.

Does that even make sense?

haha.

It makes perfect sense Woody..

As a gamer you only have your own dignity, self-respect and integrity. And you keep that intact by playing by the rules and fair.

So, I pick up it's a felt sense of injustice...

Mr "

Kind of. But more to the fact someone is losing (those that are receiving stuff, they don’t want to receive) to the people that I can’t teach a lesson to by taking the control off them and whooping their ass!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
back to top