Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"But couldn't those 5 profiles have set up meets before disappearing? " If they did then the people arranging with them have no radars on | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't think it should be compulsory no. People can filter out non verified on their filters if they wish to though. http://www.fabswingers.com/my/filters The profiles you talk about might not have been fake anyway, just changed their mind. " Cool. It was just a thought, though maybe not a very good one when hungover, lol | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hey, don't let me put you off your idea, it is just my personal opinion " Lol, i just thought that if they have to get a pic verified before being able to send a message, then you know at least that they are the sex they say they are! If that makes sense? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hi folks. There has been a lot of posts on the forum lately regarding 'timewasters and fakes'. I myself noticed 7 new profiles in my area last night, 5 of which are 'no longer on site' after a couple hours! Now, my question is, would it not put peoples mind at ease if EVERYONE had to verify their pic BEFORE being able to recieve and send messages? Whilst this may not deter the more determined fakes, it would deter the multitude of spur of the moment ones. " It does not mean they are fake. They could have come home pissed and thought fab swingers was called easy shag or shags r us. Then realised it is not shags r us so deleted the profile. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hey, don't let me put you off your idea, it is just my personal opinion Lol, i just thought that if they have to get a pic verified before being able to send a message, then you know at least that they are the sex they say they are! If that makes sense?" Yeah I know what you mean, but I think if it is compulsory then it won't suit a lot of people who don't want to pic verify. If I am honest, although we are PV'd we probably wouldn't have done it we had to to be able to use the site. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hi folks. There has been a lot of posts on the forum lately regarding 'timewasters and fakes'. I myself noticed 7 new profiles in my area last night, 5 of which are 'no longer on site' after a couple hours! Now, my question is, would it not put peoples mind at ease if EVERYONE had to verify their pic BEFORE being able to recieve and send messages? Whilst this may not deter the more determined fakes, it would deter the multitude of spur of the moment ones. It does not mean they are fake. They could have come home pissed and thought fab swingers was called easy shag or shags r us. Then realised it is not shags r us so deleted the profile. " My post wasn't specifically about those 5 profiles. It was regarding timewasters and fakes. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ah but you see theres the other thing...what makes a timewaster? Someone joining a site to see what it is all about then deciding to delete the profile when they don't like what they see? It is a possibilty. Of course it could also have been people coming in from the pub and making profiles as a laugh, then deleted. " I see your point, scratch that idea, lol. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |