Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If the feeling isn't mutual, why would I fuck about with someone who's playing you along? I’m trying to imagine they’re not playing you along they’re just not prioritising you" I'm not willing to be second choice | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No. I don't tend to practice hierarchal polyamory. I love all my partners equally, but for different reasons." I didn’t mean this intentionally to be a question around hierarchical poly but I see how it is. The question isn’t about how much love you have for them or about loving them equally, I meant it as in, do you prioritise surveying time with some more than others? And I wonder if that is unavoidable? Someone will always be the first person you ask on a specific day. Someone will always be newer to the dynamic and maybe therefore not a priority in terms of organising something. Etc. Or I imagine. But that could be because I am in a hierarchical set up so naturally think that way idk. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think most people probably don't have a string of partners so it's not something they need to consider " more than you believe. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm still working on my roster... So I'll get back to you" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don’t have 1…. Ffs. so I can’t relate. But that’s where swinging is awkward for me, imagine someone putting someone as thier number 1, but they have them as their number 3….. how does that work? " I've had a few men say they want to be my number 1. I tell them I don't have a hierarchy for my sexual partners. I meet them based on what they're offering; if our free time allows. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don’t have 1…. Ffs. so I can’t relate. But that’s where swinging is awkward for me, imagine someone putting someone as thier number 1, but they have them as their number 3….. how does that work? " I think a factor is also time and capacity. You could be someone’s number 1 but they don’t have time to meet often, they live far etc. so you’re an ideal number one for their life. But that isn’t an ideal number one for you. This is just a quickly imagined scenario but I don’t think it has to be heartbreaking is my point | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think in many ways I'm only ever an option for the people in my life. I try not to focus on that though or I'd spend my life assuming they always had a better offer! " This resonates. With the exception of Ailsa, I don’t think anyone would prioritise time with me - be that friends or lovers. It’s okay though, I’m at peace with this Xx | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don’t have 1…. Ffs. so I can’t relate. But that’s where swinging is awkward for me, imagine someone putting someone as thier number 1, but they have them as their number 3….. how does that work? I've had a few men say they want to be my number 1. I tell them I don't have a hierarchy for my sexual partners. I meet them based on what they're offering; if our free time allows. " Free time allowing is why I think most people prioritise. Or why I imagine they do | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"With lovers It will depend on who I’m vibing with the most at that time. Partners are different as I’ll only have one at a time and they will usually be prioritised over other lovers. That being said I’m not going to prioritise them all the time. I don’t want to be someone’s whole world, just the sweetest part of it. There would need to be the understand that I like to spend time with others as well. " Who you vibe with most is fair. I get that | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If I was ever lucky enough to have multiple partners I can’t imagine I’d say no to one just in case another was available. But as my all time high is 1, then that might be a perspective point of view!" Interesting I get you. I don’t imagine it as saying no to people but I guess I should’ve considered that scenario. I meant as in, when you have free time you prioritise seeing some people if they’re available. But you still have other people that you see or want to see. Idk | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don’t have 1…. Ffs. so I can’t relate. But that’s where swinging is awkward for me, imagine someone putting someone as thier number 1, but they have them as their number 3….. how does that work? I think a factor is also time and capacity. You could be someone’s number 1 but they don’t have time to meet often, they live far etc. so you’re an ideal number one for their life. But that isn’t an ideal number one for you. This is just a quickly imagined scenario but I don’t think it has to be heartbreaking is my point" If I'm having sex with someone regularly, it's because I'm very attracted to them and enjoy the sex. Sex with one man is different to another, but I enjoy them equally. There's no, one is better than the other, so gets put ahead, but, if one was to go quiet and the other/s weren't I'd be less inclined to want to meet the one who didn’t seem that interested. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Partners/ lovers? Do you prioritise based on who prioritises you?" Yes I have a couple people that will always be above others | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If I was ever lucky enough to have multiple partners I can’t imagine I’d say no to one just in case another was available. But as my all time high is 1, then that might be a perspective point of view! Interesting I get you. I don’t imagine it as saying no to people but I guess I should’ve considered that scenario. I meant as in, when you have free time you prioritise seeing some people if they’re available. But you still have other people that you see or want to see. Idk " Ok, I understand. When I have free time I’m often open to a meet, but as they are very rare, I’m often looking in the background as I do other things. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The poly people arrived all at once " Yeah boi. Polys Unite. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The poly people arrived all at once Yeah boi. Polys Unite." Gang gang | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Partners/ lovers? Do you prioritise based on who prioritises you?" Heck no. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I prioritise everyone before myself. Something I possibly need to change this year. Unlikely to though " Bit selfish | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If I was ever lucky enough to have multiple partners I can’t imagine I’d say no to one just in case another was available. But as my all time high is 1, then that might be a perspective point of view! Interesting I get you. I don’t imagine it as saying no to people but I guess I should’ve considered that scenario. I meant as in, when you have free time you prioritise seeing some people if they’re available. But you still have other people that you see or want to see. Idk " Being new to having a relationship with someone that's poly and already had an existing partner, for me it's been an interesting experience and my situation is obviously different to many, given that I don't have multiple relationship partners - just the one. I do prioritise them when I'm free and have sufficient time off to travel to see them, but I'd never get stressy if/when they have plans with their other partner if the dates coincided. Nor would I ever expect them to jump through hoops or rejig their diary to make a trip to see me. If we can spend time together that's great. If we can't for a few weeks that's also fine. Distance will always be an issue as will work and balancing time with other people, be that partners, friends or family. But that also gives you the freedom to enjoy personal time and space, which is important. As long as you're communicating clearly and making sure you don't make someone feel in any way less important or valued, then life will be good. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I prioritise my family. If you mean FAB contacts as "lovers" then I don't mess them about but they are not in the same category as family. Bit confused by your post." I am too confused by the op | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I prioritise my family. If you mean FAB contacts as "lovers" then I don't mess them about but they are not in the same category as family. Bit confused by your post." Do you prioritise some lovers and/or partners over others? That’s the first question. Think that clarity should help with the second one. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I prioritise my family. If you mean FAB contacts as "lovers" then I don't mess them about but they are not in the same category as family. Bit confused by your post. I am too confused by the op" So why did you answer ‘no’ then? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't prioritise between my special friends. We all have different relationships and we fit like a jigsaw regarding free time and availability. With them meeting others, no-one is waiting for someone else, to fill a slot as such I do however prioritise them, above fuck buddies, as we are in ltr's and fuck buddies come and go " I like this way of putting it. And do you know instantly if they’re to be a fb and not a special friend? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"is this becomes a frequent.issue then.probably it's an indicator that your life has,become too complicated and it's probably time to simplify it so you can be fair to everyone." You can’t always be fair to everyone. We’re not fair to everyone with our time. We simply cannot split our time evenly between everyone that wants it. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I havent had much experience but have had a little overlap between two very special people at one time, but I think I can only really focus on one person at a time (as I got/get quite intense) so I would prioritise the one that I was meeting the most. And then, I would need to know there was a clear end/break with one before moving on again. Im not poly I reckon " I skipped to the end where you said you’re not poly and got my tiny violin out | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I havent had much experience but have had a little overlap between two very special people at one time, but I think I can only really focus on one person at a time (as I got/get quite intense) so I would prioritise the one that I was meeting the most. And then, I would need to know there was a clear end/break with one before moving on again. Im not poly I reckon I skipped to the end where you said you’re not poly and got my tiny violin out" Im not currently anything. Nunlike, I have been playing my tiny violin for eons | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Partners/ lovers?..." • I'm still working on that concept. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I havent had much experience but have had a little overlap between two very special people at one time, but I think I can only really focus on one person at a time (as I got/get quite intense) so I would prioritise the one that I was meeting the most. And then, I would need to know there was a clear end/break with one before moving on again. Im not poly I reckon I skipped to the end where you said you’re not poly and got my tiny violin out Im not currently anything. Nunlike, I have been playing my tiny violin for eons " Hahaha. Is that a joke about being old | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I havent had much experience but have had a little overlap between two very special people at one time, but I think I can only really focus on one person at a time (as I got/get quite intense) so I would prioritise the one that I was meeting the most. And then, I would need to know there was a clear end/break with one before moving on again. Im not poly I reckon I skipped to the end where you said you’re not poly and got my tiny violin out Im not currently anything. Nunlike, I have been playing my tiny violin for eons Hahaha. Is that a joke about being old" Unlucky for you, I like older women | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Partners/ lovers?... • I'm still working on that concept." I know you’re a gyalist. Nice try | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I prioritise everyone before myself. Something I possibly need to change this year. Unlikely to though Bit selfish" My scales are growing in nicely | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Partners/ lovers?... • I'm still working on that concept. · I know you’re a gyalist. Nice try" • I'm always hankering for more, young sirrah. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I prioritise my family. If you mean FAB contacts as "lovers" then I don't mess them about but they are not in the same category as family. Bit confused by your post. Do you prioritise some lovers and/or partners over others? That’s the first question. Think that clarity should help with the second one. " I don't have lovers and only have 1 husband. Are you saying a man I have sex with at a party is classed as a lover, not in my world he isn't. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I prioritise my family. If you mean FAB contacts as "lovers" then I don't mess them about but they are not in the same category as family. Bit confused by your post. Do you prioritise some lovers and/or partners over others? That’s the first question. Think that clarity should help with the second one. I don't have lovers and only have 1 husband. Are you saying a man I have sex with at a party is classed as a lover, not in my world he isn't. " No I’m not saying that | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I prioritise my family. If you mean FAB contacts as "lovers" then I don't mess them about but they are not in the same category as family. Bit confused by your post. Do you prioritise some lovers and/or partners over others? That’s the first question. Think that clarity should help with the second one. I don't have lovers and only have 1 husband. Are you saying a man I have sex with at a party is classed as a lover, not in my world he isn't. No I’m not saying that " If it isn’t applicable to you then it isn’t applicable to you | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"yes as long as there isn't something good on telly " Very funny | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"yes as long as there isn't something good on telly Very funny " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Partners/ lovers?... • I'm still working on that concept." People you fuck. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Partners/ lovers? Do you prioritise based on who prioritises you?" I don’t prioritise partners/lovers over platonic friends, or vice versa - relationship anarchy for the win. I do think I prioritise based on who prioritises me, not as a punitive measure just a kinda matching energy vibe. Unless someone is struggling and simply needs me, then I’m there. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |