Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Reports that the first female. Will referee the football in the Premier League which was actually known as Division 1 before they changed it's name. Good luck to her but will see these footballers swearing at her like they do the men,? Send the buggers off. Tom was taught not to swear in front of ladies. Can't wait to see her first match. What's going on here guys. It's all over the news. Should men swear at or in front of a lady ?" Who is it? Eve? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Reports that the first female. Will referee the football in the Premier League which was actually known as Division 1 before they changed it's name. Good luck to her but will see these footballers swearing at her like they do the men,? Send the buggers off. Tom was taught not to swear in front of ladies. Can't wait to see her first match. What's going on here guys. It's all over the news. Should men swear at or in front of a lady ?" Apparently swearing and assault are "part of the game". Whilst rugby is still a long way ahead of football in this... Its getting much worse in rugby too. We've had female refs for quite a while now and nobody bat's an eyelid. If they are good enough they get the gig. I think the authorities have dropped a bollock on this one though by making it a big deal. It really isn't a big deal. If they make it a big deal, then so will everyone else, the knuckle draggers more than ever. Good luck to her anyway. Who'd be a ref!? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s crazy that when you conform to the norm, or you’re in a minority, the first thing people assume when you get a chance is that you’re just there to tick a box " I would agree with you. Unfortunately I have seen this happen and very recently. A vacancy was advertised where I work, the only applicants were male. The vacancy was readvertised and makers were told to find females as all the current roles in this team were male and they needed females to balance the role. Qualification for the role was secondary to the sex of the applicants. I have no issue with sex colour creed etc. however a position should be given to the best person to fulfil it irrelevant of any other factor. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s crazy that when you conform to the norm, or you’re in a minority, the first thing people assume when you get a chance is that you’re just there to tick a box I would agree with you. Unfortunately I have seen this happen and very recently. A vacancy was advertised where I work, the only applicants were male. The vacancy was readvertised and makers were told to find females as all the current roles in this team were male and they needed females to balance the role. Qualification for the role was secondary to the sex of the applicants. I have no issue with sex colour creed etc. however a position should be given to the best person to fulfil it irrelevant of any other factor. " I suppose it’s context though in some regard. Where I work all applications are blind, so I don’t see name, age, race, gender or anything else that could support conscious or un*onscious bias. as a hiring manager my decision to shortlist to interview stage is based on the quality of the application and supporting statement and not those other factors. It doesn’t mean you can’t work some stuff out (ie when did they go to school to work out age, did they go to a faith school etc but it certainly makes the initial phasing a lot fairer. In relation to your situation, again it’s context but maybe the wording of the original application was not inclusive and thus deterred women from applying in the first place. A couple of simple tweaks and a re-advert can sort that right out | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s crazy that when you conform to the norm, or you’re in a minority, the first thing people assume when you get a chance is that you’re just there to tick a box " Not crazy at all. Happens all the time and more than ever in populist visible jobs. Sad but true. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s crazy that when you conform to the norm, or you’re in a minority, the first thing people assume when you get a chance is that you’re just there to tick a box I would agree with you. Unfortunately I have seen this happen and very recently. A vacancy was advertised where I work, the only applicants were male. The vacancy was readvertised and makers were told to find females as all the current roles in this team were male and they needed females to balance the role. Qualification for the role was secondary to the sex of the applicants. I have no issue with sex colour creed etc. however a position should be given to the best person to fulfil it irrelevant of any other factor. I suppose it’s context though in some regard. Where I work all applications are blind, so I don’t see name, age, race, gender or anything else that could support conscious or un*onscious bias. as a hiring manager my decision to shortlist to interview stage is based on the quality of the application and supporting statement and not those other factors. It doesn’t mean you can’t work some stuff out (ie when did they go to school to work out age, did they go to a faith school etc but it certainly makes the initial phasing a lot fairer. In relation to your situation, again it’s context but maybe the wording of the original application was not inclusive and thus deterred women from applying in the first place. A couple of simple tweaks and a re-advert can sort that right out " I think there’s been a few hiring scandals just this year about racist hiring practises The RAF was 1st saying they weren’t hiring white men Aviva boss just came out admitting that white candidates get put to the back It’s a strange world | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think it’s gonna cause issues at first because there’s a lot of rules in football and the refs decision needs to be based on logic not emotion or feelings But I think eventually it’ll sort itself out as they become more familiar with the sport " This comment wins today's Internet. Well played Sir, well played. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I ask you, whatever next Next you'll be telling me women can PLAY football Stick to ironing and having babies " That is exactly what my mother said on hearing the news | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I ask you, whatever next Next you'll be telling me women can PLAY football Stick to ironing and having babies That is exactly what my mother said on hearing the news " They'll be wanting equal pay next pffttt | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |