Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
![]() | Back to forum list |
![]() | Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest | ![]() |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I need some advice. I was pulled in work last week because I hadn’t implemented the contract I am managing. It was something reasonably minute but none the less it was a contractually requirement. My issue is that this contract clause has never been implemented. I am annoyed about this as I think it’s slightly unfair to pull me on it now when the issue has been historical. But my big boy pants are in and my boss is correct I have not implemented the contract as per the letter of the law. My boss has re-iterated my role is black and white. And if the conditions of contract aren’t meet don’t process the payment. It’s slightly more complicated as my predecessor is still in the organisation but moved up to director role. So I’m now going to be highlighting historical issues he did not manage as per the contract. I can just see it all getting so messy. Has anyone any advice? " Communicate this to your bosses first. Not if you tell them all you said on here. Hope they not reading this. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I need some advice. I was pulled in work last week because I hadn’t implemented the contract I am managing. It was something reasonably minute but none the less it was a contractually requirement. My issue is that this contract clause has never been implemented. I am annoyed about this as I think it’s slightly unfair to pull me on it now when the issue has been historical. But my big boy pants are in and my boss is correct I have not implemented the contract as per the letter of the law. My boss has re-iterated my role is black and white. And if the conditions of contract aren’t meet don’t process the payment. It’s slightly more complicated as my predecessor is still in the organisation but moved up to director role. So I’m now going to be highlighting historical issues he did not manage as per the contract. I can just see it all getting so messy. Has anyone any advice? " Attitudes change in organisations as the people and external forces do. Some managers are sticklers for dotting the i’s and crossing the t’s whereas others are happy so long as things are working out. Managing up is an important skill, you need to work out what keeps your boss happy, what their preferences are, and you’ll soon be able to keep them off your back. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sometimes a change in people can be a good opportunity for 'refreshing' the process and resharing the guidelines - then you can perhaps highlight areas you will be focusing on If it could fail an audit, you could use that as a way to move forward Good luck - it's always tricky when it gets political " This. It's a great 'excuse' to remind people of what is required without seeming like a dick. People can forget what is important, or they can do it on purpose. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Out of interest why didn't you implement that particular clause? I know the previous incumbent didn't but the question that'll be asked is 'why didn't you?'" ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You have to be honest and upfront. I've had to go to the directors last week about something quite serious that my colleague hasn't been doing, in essence it amounts to fraud. I had to say something as I've been promoted, with the responsibility of that area, and I'm not prepared to take that responsibility on until it's sorted. I felt shit, felt I was bad mouthing my colleague but you have to be honest." Hi thanks. My boss is only doing his job and I respect that. My issue is the historical mismanagement and it being accepted all along. Now it’s my issue. I accept I’m wrong and I accept I’ve to move on | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Out of interest why didn't you implement that particular clause? I know the previous incumbent didn't but the question that'll be asked is 'why didn't you?'" Hi thanks for replying. It really was a minor clause in comtract around stamping of invoices as true and certified. The reason I never did was it was historical and in all honesty there was more important issues to manage. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Out of interest why didn't you implement that particular clause? I know the previous incumbent didn't but the question that'll be asked is 'why didn't you?'" Yep. If you knew it was a contractual clause and ignored it, it almost doesn't matter what went before. You could demonstrate that you were following precedent, but probably should have highlighted that you'd found a historical anomaly rather than just following, or at least checked formally. Can you offer a solution on how to rectify the situation? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I need some advice. I was pulled in work last week because I hadn’t implemented the contract I am managing. It was something reasonably minute but none the less it was a contractually requirement. My issue is that this contract clause has never been implemented. I am annoyed about this as I think it’s slightly unfair to pull me on it now when the issue has been historical. But my big boy pants are in and my boss is correct I have not implemented the contract as per the letter of the law. My boss has re-iterated my role is black and white. And if the conditions of contract aren’t meet don’t process the payment. It’s slightly more complicated as my predecessor is still in the organisation but moved up to director role. So I’m now going to be highlighting historical issues he did not manage as per the contract. I can just see it all getting so messy. Has anyone any advice? Attitudes change in organisations as the people and external forces do. Some managers are sticklers for dotting the i’s and crossing the t’s whereas others are happy so long as things are working out. Managing up is an important skill, you need to work out what keeps your boss happy, what their preferences are, and you’ll soon be able to keep them off your back." My new boss is black and white. Which is good as you know where you stand. But previously it has been wishy washy hear no evil see no evil. In all honesty I feel very very silly and exposed as it’s black and white I’m wrong | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Out of interest why didn't you implement that particular clause? I know the previous incumbent didn't but the question that'll be asked is 'why didn't you?' Hi thanks for replying. It really was a minor clause in comtract around stamping of invoices as true and certified. The reason I never did was it was historical and in all honesty there was more important issues to manage. " Ok. I agree with you that you should accept responsibility. I'd avoid saying there are more important issues to manage though. If you're managing ... you're managing. Is this something you have to do personally or is it delegated? The previous job holder might have been promoted out of the role because they weren't very good at it and they've brought you in to tighten things up. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Out of interest why didn't you implement that particular clause? I know the previous incumbent didn't but the question that'll be asked is 'why didn't you?' Yep. If you knew it was a contractual clause and ignored it, it almost doesn't matter what went before. You could demonstrate that you were following precedent, but probably should have highlighted that you'd found a historical anomaly rather than just following, or at least checked formally. Can you offer a solution on how to rectify the situation? " Yes I will highlight the historical issues and leave it at that. Moving forward I will manage it no problem. It’s a visual inspection of stamping invoices so it’s black and white literally. I can just foresee silly tit for tat and me applying the contract to the letter of the law and me being the “ new bad guy” | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I need some advice. I was pulled in work last week because I hadn’t implemented the contract I am managing. It was something reasonably minute but none the less it was a contractually requirement. My issue is that this contract clause has never been implemented. I am annoyed about this as I think it’s slightly unfair to pull me on it now when the issue has been historical. But my big boy pants are in and my boss is correct I have not implemented the contract as per the letter of the law. My boss has re-iterated my role is black and white. And if the conditions of contract aren’t meet don’t process the payment. It’s slightly more complicated as my predecessor is still in the organisation but moved up to director role. So I’m now going to be highlighting historical issues he did not manage as per the contract. I can just see it all getting so messy. Has anyone any advice? Attitudes change in organisations as the people and external forces do. Some managers are sticklers for dotting the i’s and crossing the t’s whereas others are happy so long as things are working out. Managing up is an important skill, you need to work out what keeps your boss happy, what their preferences are, and you’ll soon be able to keep them off your back. My new boss is black and white. Which is good as you know where you stand. But previously it has been wishy washy hear no evil see no evil. In all honesty I feel very very silly and exposed as it’s black and white I’m wrong" We've nearly all been there! I know I have and I felt so utterly daft | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Out of interest why didn't you implement that particular clause? I know the previous incumbent didn't but the question that'll be asked is 'why didn't you?' Hi thanks for replying. It really was a minor clause in comtract around stamping of invoices as true and certified. The reason I never did was it was historical and in all honesty there was more important issues to manage. Ok. I agree with you that you should accept responsibility. I'd avoid saying there are more important issues to manage though. If you're managing ... you're managing. Is this something you have to do personally or is it delegated? The previous job holder might have been promoted out of the role because they weren't very good at it and they've brought you in to tighten things up. " I can’t but accept responsibility it’s black and white. I can’t argue I’ve failed. I just feel horribly exposed | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well without knowing what kind of job it is (all this talk of 'implementing contracts' all sounds a bit highfalutin for my simple tran-brain), basically you're saying the previous incumbent has left you with a bit of a shit sandwich, but pointing this out might be complicated as he's now sitting on the board, correct? I think you should just do the task as required, THEN point out that this situation has arisen due to historical neglect. You might be next in line for promotion should a director vacate his position. " I agree and that’s my feelings on the matter | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Out of interest why didn't you implement that particular clause? I know the previous incumbent didn't but the question that'll be asked is 'why didn't you?' Yep. If you knew it was a contractual clause and ignored it, it almost doesn't matter what went before. You could demonstrate that you were following precedent, but probably should have highlighted that you'd found a historical anomaly rather than just following, or at least checked formally. Can you offer a solution on how to rectify the situation? Yes I will highlight the historical issues and leave it at that. Moving forward I will manage it no problem. It’s a visual inspection of stamping invoices so it’s black and white literally. I can just foresee silly tit for tat and me applying the contract to the letter of the law and me being the “ new bad guy” " Yeah, I get that. But, and I don't know your industry, but better to follow a contract to the letter than leave any element of legal risk to your company? And if it's a worthless clause, can you instigate a renegotiation of the contract to remove it? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Out of interest why didn't you implement that particular clause? I know the previous incumbent didn't but the question that'll be asked is 'why didn't you?' Hi thanks for replying. It really was a minor clause in comtract around stamping of invoices as true and certified. The reason I never did was it was historical and in all honesty there was more important issues to manage. Ok. I agree with you that you should accept responsibility. I'd avoid saying there are more important issues to manage though. If you're managing ... you're managing. Is this something you have to do personally or is it delegated? The previous job holder might have been promoted out of the role because they weren't very good at it and they've brought you in to tighten things up. I can’t but accept responsibility it’s black and white. I can’t argue I’ve failed. I just feel horribly exposed " It's not nice to feel that way especially when you know you're not the only one who hasn't done this task. I think someone above has said swallow it this time but point out that you're trying to sort out the historical neglect. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Out of interest why didn't you implement that particular clause? I know the previous incumbent didn't but the question that'll be asked is 'why didn't you?' Yep. If you knew it was a contractual clause and ignored it, it almost doesn't matter what went before. You could demonstrate that you were following precedent, but probably should have highlighted that you'd found a historical anomaly rather than just following, or at least checked formally. Can you offer a solution on how to rectify the situation? Yes I will highlight the historical issues and leave it at that. Moving forward I will manage it no problem. It’s a visual inspection of stamping invoices so it’s black and white literally. I can just foresee silly tit for tat and me applying the contract to the letter of the law and me being the “ new bad guy” Yeah, I get that. But, and I don't know your industry, but better to follow a contract to the letter than leave any element of legal risk to your company? And if it's a worthless clause, can you instigate a renegotiation of the contract to remove it?" I work in construction contract management. The clause is not useless it’s just something that historically has been overlooked. By all parties. My new boss is very black & White. And this issue has been highlighted to him. And he sees it as black and white. And he is correct. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Out of interest why didn't you implement that particular clause? I know the previous incumbent didn't but the question that'll be asked is 'why didn't you?' Hi thanks for replying. It really was a minor clause in comtract around stamping of invoices as true and certified. The reason I never did was it was historical and in all honesty there was more important issues to manage. Ok. I agree with you that you should accept responsibility. I'd avoid saying there are more important issues to manage though. If you're managing ... you're managing. Is this something you have to do personally or is it delegated? The previous job holder might have been promoted out of the role because they weren't very good at it and they've brought you in to tighten things up. I can’t but accept responsibility it’s black and white. I can’t argue I’ve failed. I just feel horribly exposed " Is there something else bothering you? Are you concerned there may be other things being done incorrectly that you're not aware of yet? It's shit that you're getting the blame when someone else was shit and got away with it. Try and take it as a compliment. Often idiots get away with stuff but more clever people don't because people expect more of them. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Out of interest why didn't you implement that particular clause? I know the previous incumbent didn't but the question that'll be asked is 'why didn't you?' Hi thanks for replying. It really was a minor clause in comtract around stamping of invoices as true and certified. The reason I never did was it was historical and in all honesty there was more important issues to manage. Ok. I agree with you that you should accept responsibility. I'd avoid saying there are more important issues to manage though. If you're managing ... you're managing. Is this something you have to do personally or is it delegated? The previous job holder might have been promoted out of the role because they weren't very good at it and they've brought you in to tighten things up. I can’t but accept responsibility it’s black and white. I can’t argue I’ve failed. I just feel horribly exposed It's not nice to feel that way especially when you know you're not the only one who hasn't done this task. I think someone above has said swallow it this time but point out that you're trying to sort out the historical neglect. " I will defo point out it’s been a historical issue. But the issue is the neglect I’m Pointing out is the new director who is my predecessor and new head of department. That’s complex | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Out of interest why didn't you implement that particular clause? I know the previous incumbent didn't but the question that'll be asked is 'why didn't you?' Hi thanks for replying. It really was a minor clause in comtract around stamping of invoices as true and certified. The reason I never did was it was historical and in all honesty there was more important issues to manage. Ok. I agree with you that you should accept responsibility. I'd avoid saying there are more important issues to manage though. If you're managing ... you're managing. Is this something you have to do personally or is it delegated? The previous job holder might have been promoted out of the role because they weren't very good at it and they've brought you in to tighten things up. I can’t but accept responsibility it’s black and white. I can’t argue I’ve failed. I just feel horribly exposed Is there something else bothering you? Are you concerned there may be other things being done incorrectly that you're not aware of yet? It's shit that you're getting the blame when someone else was shit and got away with it. Try and take it as a compliment. Often idiots get away with stuff but more clever people don't because people expect more of them. " In my role sometimes I have to apply common sense. Unfortunately when ppl review decisions it can be difficult to rationalise and explain that decision months after the fact | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Out of interest why didn't you implement that particular clause? I know the previous incumbent didn't but the question that'll be asked is 'why didn't you?' Hi thanks for replying. It really was a minor clause in comtract around stamping of invoices as true and certified. The reason I never did was it was historical and in all honesty there was more important issues to manage. Ok. I agree with you that you should accept responsibility. I'd avoid saying there are more important issues to manage though. If you're managing ... you're managing. Is this something you have to do personally or is it delegated? The previous job holder might have been promoted out of the role because they weren't very good at it and they've brought you in to tighten things up. I can’t but accept responsibility it’s black and white. I can’t argue I’ve failed. I just feel horribly exposed It's not nice to feel that way especially when you know you're not the only one who hasn't done this task. I think someone above has said swallow it this time but point out that you're trying to sort out the historical neglect. I will defo point out it’s been a historical issue. But the issue is the neglect I’m Pointing out is the new director who is my predecessor and new head of department. That’s complex " I understand. Good luck with it all | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Out of interest why didn't you implement that particular clause? I know the previous incumbent didn't but the question that'll be asked is 'why didn't you?' Hi thanks for replying. It really was a minor clause in comtract around stamping of invoices as true and certified. The reason I never did was it was historical and in all honesty there was more important issues to manage. Ok. I agree with you that you should accept responsibility. I'd avoid saying there are more important issues to manage though. If you're managing ... you're managing. Is this something you have to do personally or is it delegated? The previous job holder might have been promoted out of the role because they weren't very good at it and they've brought you in to tighten things up. I can’t but accept responsibility it’s black and white. I can’t argue I’ve failed. I just feel horribly exposed " I don't see why. You're focusing on problems before they have arisen. If it's not been part of everyday abcd then unless your job is to review processes (I expect it isn't as someone has highlighted it), then as it has been highlighted, it will now - if needs to be. Companies talk, they review, implement, discuss, they don't take action on someone for someone else not doing something. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Out of interest why didn't you implement that particular clause? I know the previous incumbent didn't but the question that'll be asked is 'why didn't you?' Hi thanks for replying. It really was a minor clause in comtract around stamping of invoices as true and certified. The reason I never did was it was historical and in all honesty there was more important issues to manage. Ok. I agree with you that you should accept responsibility. I'd avoid saying there are more important issues to manage though. If you're managing ... you're managing. Is this something you have to do personally or is it delegated? The previous job holder might have been promoted out of the role because they weren't very good at it and they've brought you in to tighten things up. I can’t but accept responsibility it’s black and white. I can’t argue I’ve failed. I just feel horribly exposed I don't see why. You're focusing on problems before they have arisen. If it's not been part of everyday abcd then unless your job is to review processes (I expect it isn't as someone has highlighted it), then as it has been highlighted, it will now - if needs to be. Companies talk, they review, implement, discuss, they don't take action on someone for someone else not doing something." I am just going to have to take this one on the chin and move on. Nothing more I can do | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Out of interest why didn't you implement that particular clause? I know the previous incumbent didn't but the question that'll be asked is 'why didn't you?' Hi thanks for replying. It really was a minor clause in comtract around stamping of invoices as true and certified. The reason I never did was it was historical and in all honesty there was more important issues to manage. Ok. I agree with you that you should accept responsibility. I'd avoid saying there are more important issues to manage though. If you're managing ... you're managing. Is this something you have to do personally or is it delegated? The previous job holder might have been promoted out of the role because they weren't very good at it and they've brought you in to tighten things up. I can’t but accept responsibility it’s black and white. I can’t argue I’ve failed. I just feel horribly exposed Is there something else bothering you? Are you concerned there may be other things being done incorrectly that you're not aware of yet? It's shit that you're getting the blame when someone else was shit and got away with it. Try and take it as a compliment. Often idiots get away with stuff but more clever people don't because people expect more of them. In my role sometimes I have to apply common sense. Unfortunately when ppl review decisions it can be difficult to rationalise and explain that decision months after the fact " Maybe keep a diary to remind you of facts and dates. I'm starting one for work as proof that approvals / support was sought and given, due to ongoing issues. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Out of interest why didn't you implement that particular clause? I know the previous incumbent didn't but the question that'll be asked is 'why didn't you?' Hi thanks for replying. It really was a minor clause in comtract around stamping of invoices as true and certified. The reason I never did was it was historical and in all honesty there was more important issues to manage. Ok. I agree with you that you should accept responsibility. I'd avoid saying there are more important issues to manage though. If you're managing ... you're managing. Is this something you have to do personally or is it delegated? The previous job holder might have been promoted out of the role because they weren't very good at it and they've brought you in to tighten things up. I can’t but accept responsibility it’s black and white. I can’t argue I’ve failed. I just feel horribly exposed Is there something else bothering you? Are you concerned there may be other things being done incorrectly that you're not aware of yet? It's shit that you're getting the blame when someone else was shit and got away with it. Try and take it as a compliment. Often idiots get away with stuff but more clever people don't because people expect more of them. In my role sometimes I have to apply common sense. Unfortunately when ppl review decisions it can be difficult to rationalise and explain that decision months after the fact Maybe keep a diary to remind you of facts and dates. I'm starting one for work as proof that approvals / support was sought and given, due to ongoing issues. " Lol do you work in my work? Sounds like same issues I’m Having in ways | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Out of interest why didn't you implement that particular clause? I know the previous incumbent didn't but the question that'll be asked is 'why didn't you?' Hi thanks for replying. It really was a minor clause in comtract around stamping of invoices as true and certified. The reason I never did was it was historical and in all honesty there was more important issues to manage. Ok. I agree with you that you should accept responsibility. I'd avoid saying there are more important issues to manage though. If you're managing ... you're managing. Is this something you have to do personally or is it delegated? The previous job holder might have been promoted out of the role because they weren't very good at it and they've brought you in to tighten things up. I can’t but accept responsibility it’s black and white. I can’t argue I’ve failed. I just feel horribly exposed I don't see why. You're focusing on problems before they have arisen. If it's not been part of everyday abcd then unless your job is to review processes (I expect it isn't as someone has highlighted it), then as it has been highlighted, it will now - if needs to be. Companies talk, they review, implement, discuss, they don't take action on someone for someone else not doing something. I am just going to have to take this one on the chin and move on. Nothing more I can do " Manager v's contracts manager v's lawyer. It's not been done, it now will be if necessary. Keep it simple. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Out of interest why didn't you implement that particular clause? I know the previous incumbent didn't but the question that'll be asked is 'why didn't you?' Hi thanks for replying. It really was a minor clause in comtract around stamping of invoices as true and certified. The reason I never did was it was historical and in all honesty there was more important issues to manage. Ok. I agree with you that you should accept responsibility. I'd avoid saying there are more important issues to manage though. If you're managing ... you're managing. Is this something you have to do personally or is it delegated? The previous job holder might have been promoted out of the role because they weren't very good at it and they've brought you in to tighten things up. I can’t but accept responsibility it’s black and white. I can’t argue I’ve failed. I just feel horribly exposed Is there something else bothering you? Are you concerned there may be other things being done incorrectly that you're not aware of yet? It's shit that you're getting the blame when someone else was shit and got away with it. Try and take it as a compliment. Often idiots get away with stuff but more clever people don't because people expect more of them. In my role sometimes I have to apply common sense. Unfortunately when ppl review decisions it can be difficult to rationalise and explain that decision months after the fact Maybe keep a diary to remind you of facts and dates. I'm starting one for work as proof that approvals / support was sought and given, due to ongoing issues. Lol do you work in my work? Sounds like same issues I’m Having in ways " No... your work sounds to have some competent people. ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Out of interest why didn't you implement that particular clause? I know the previous incumbent didn't but the question that'll be asked is 'why didn't you?' Hi thanks for replying. It really was a minor clause in comtract around stamping of invoices as true and certified. The reason I never did was it was historical and in all honesty there was more important issues to manage. Ok. I agree with you that you should accept responsibility. I'd avoid saying there are more important issues to manage though. If you're managing ... you're managing. Is this something you have to do personally or is it delegated? The previous job holder might have been promoted out of the role because they weren't very good at it and they've brought you in to tighten things up. I can’t but accept responsibility it’s black and white. I can’t argue I’ve failed. I just feel horribly exposed I don't see why. You're focusing on problems before they have arisen. If it's not been part of everyday abcd then unless your job is to review processes (I expect it isn't as someone has highlighted it), then as it has been highlighted, it will now - if needs to be. Companies talk, they review, implement, discuss, they don't take action on someone for someone else not doing something. I am just going to have to take this one on the chin and move on. Nothing more I can do Manager v's contracts manager v's lawyer. It's not been done, it now will be if necessary. Keep it simple. " I’m applying kiss model from here on in! Keep It Simple Stupid I am doing my job to the letter if the law | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I need some advice. I was pulled in work last week because I hadn’t implemented the contract I am managing. It was something reasonably minute but none the less it was a contractually requirement. My issue is that this contract clause has never been implemented. I am annoyed about this as I think it’s slightly unfair to pull me on it now when the issue has been historical. But my big boy pants are in and my boss is correct I have not implemented the contract as per the letter of the law. My boss has re-iterated my role is black and white. And if the conditions of contract aren’t meet don’t process the payment. It’s slightly more complicated as my predecessor is still in the organisation but moved up to director role. So I’m now going to be highlighting historical issues he did not manage as per the contract. I can just see it all getting so messy. Has anyone any advice? " . I would advise if you are a union member speak to them first.If they can help they will or at least give good advice if they can’t.Although I am a civil servant in a office in 2016 I was asked to take on a additional job role 1 hour a day. I refused and I agreed to 2 hours a day with one whole day at the end of the month for house keeping which I hardly ever took. I had a email from the office manager confirming this.In 2021 my line manager wanted to change it to 1 hour and 10 minutes.This led to various arguments and it was only when I got the union involved and I presented the original email that it was agreed I should continue doing the role for 2 hours until we could have a meeting with my line manager and the new office manager to renegotiate how long I needed.The meetings didn’t go the way the managers wanted them to go and problems with my health I came away from the 2 hour job role June 2022.I have since been approached by my successor , supervisor , work wife asking if I would consider returning to the 2 hour job role either permanently or as back up to cover leave. I know it was my line manager and office manager who approached my work wife as they feel all she has to do is bat her eye lids and I would do what she wants which on this occasion I wouldn’t. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Put your penis away in any serious discussion ![]() Never lol | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I need some advice. I was pulled in work last week because I hadn’t implemented the contract I am managing. It was something reasonably minute but none the less it was a contractually requirement. My issue is that this contract clause has never been implemented. I am annoyed about this as I think it’s slightly unfair to pull me on it now when the issue has been historical. But my big boy pants are in and my boss is correct I have not implemented the contract as per the letter of the law. My boss has re-iterated my role is black and white. And if the conditions of contract aren’t meet don’t process the payment. It’s slightly more complicated as my predecessor is still in the organisation but moved up to director role. So I’m now going to be highlighting historical issues he did not manage as per the contract. I can just see it all getting so messy. Has anyone any advice? . I would advise if you are a union member speak to them first.If they can help they will or at least give good advice if they can’t.Although I am a civil servant in a office in 2016 I was asked to take on a additional job role 1 hour a day. I refused and I agreed to 2 hours a day with one whole day at the end of the month for house keeping which I hardly ever took. I had a email from the office manager confirming this.In 2021 my line manager wanted to change it to 1 hour and 10 minutes.This led to various arguments and it was only when I got the union involved and I presented the original email that it was agreed I should continue doing the role for 2 hours until we could have a meeting with my line manager and the new office manager to renegotiate how long I needed.The meetings didn’t go the way the managers wanted them to go and problems with my health I came away from the 2 hour job role June 2022.I have since been approached by my successor , supervisor , work wife asking if I would consider returning to the 2 hour job role either permanently or as back up to cover leave. I know it was my line manager and office manager who approached my work wife as they feel all she has to do is bat her eye lids and I would do what she wants which on this occasion I wouldn’t." Thank you! Much appreciated | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Unfortunately, you're going to have to take the hit, but I would be inclined to have a private chat with your predecessor and ask for clarification of the situation... politely of course. If he has been elevated to the lofty heights, you'll probably find that this situation will magically go away... ![]() I hope you are correct | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You have to be honest and upfront. I've had to go to the directors last week about something quite serious that my colleague hasn't been doing, in essence it amounts to fraud. I had to say something as I've been promoted, with the responsibility of that area, and I'm not prepared to take that responsibility on until it's sorted. I felt shit, felt I was bad mouthing my colleague but you have to be honest." Why didn't you just have a word with your EX COLLEAGUE and point out that you know what they are doing and it has to stop because your getting promoted, nothing worse than a poacher becoming a gamekeeper | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"OP - did you post a few months ago about asking whether you should take a new job that was much higher paid and that you knew you could do but was reknowned for being difficult and political? Is this that job?" Yes I did. But this is my current role | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So I work in this area. If I’m aware, a contract clause is not being billed or being billed incorrectly, identify and raise a billing assurance ticket to cover my back. I inherited 2.1 billion unbilled revenue in one, and got it down to zero in 18 months. If there is reluctance from commercial to bill a clause, which is often the case, go to legal, they are responsible for interpretation of contract clause, not commercial. Get it in writing that both legal and commercial agreed not to build a clause Good luck " Hi Thanks for input | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top | ![]() |