Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think some people mistake an emotional connection for respect, communication and actually wanting to know their name first. I can fuck quite happily without getting attached or connecting but I don't just give that to anyone. " This And approach is very very important !! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Women absolutely can, if your hot enough Go find a really tall good looking gym guy with tattoos, ask him how many women he’s fucked in a club toilet without an emotional connection " Not great news for unattractive men wanting a hole to fuck. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Can't women just fuck recreationally?" Sometimes they just tell you that so they don't hurt your feelings with the real reason.... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Women absolutely can, if your hot enough Go find a really tall good looking gym guy with tattoos, ask him how many women he’s fucked in a club toilet without an emotional connection Not great news for unattractive men wanting a hole to fuck. " That’s what balaclava’s and glory holes are for, apparently | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Women absolutely can, if your hot enough Go find a really tall good looking gym guy with tattoos, ask him how many women he’s fucked in a club toilet without an emotional connection Not great news for unattractive men wanting a hole to fuck. " It’s something all men should learn and accept, preferably through experience That girl that needs a few socials before you can hook up sucked a guy in the toilet after 4 words at a club Welcome to reality lads | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Women absolutely can, if your hot enough Go find a really tall good looking gym guy with tattoos, ask him how many women he’s fucked in a club toilet without an emotional connection Not great news for unattractive men wanting a hole to fuck. It’s something all men should learn and accept, preferably through experience That girl that needs a few socials before you can hook up sucked a guy in the toilet after 4 words at a club Welcome to reality lads " Basically from biological staff point is easier do it when to fake it than men. Not saying a lack of emo Is faking it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We don't and we can... From MY personal experience, it's the Men who can't fuck without developing "feels"." I second this. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"This idea is actually supported by research suggesting that women often link emotional connection with sexual desire, possibly influenced by evolutionary factors favouring careful mate selection due to limited egg supply. Also psychological factors such as; How we raised, traditional approaches towards relationships , place in community etc. " You missed off pretty penis. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"This idea is actually supported by research suggesting that women often link emotional connection with sexual desire, possibly influenced by evolutionary factors favouring careful mate selection due to limited egg supply. Also psychological factors such as; How we raised, traditional approaches towards relationships , place in community etc. You missed off pretty penis." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Can't women just fuck recreationally?" Na, not how they work. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Can't women just fuck recreationally? Na, not how they work. " I disagree. Especially on here. From what I’ve read over the years it seems to be more women who are terrified of feelings than men. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Can't women just fuck recreationally? Na, not how they work. " I'm inclined to agree, where those whom say men get emotionally involved, I say this; I think women lure the men into a false sense of emotional involvement whereas the truth is women just can't fuck like blowing theiy nose in a handkerchief! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think with swinging the last thing you want is emotional connection, i save that for my hubby, i just fuck other men for fun x " I've noticed that with couples. There is a much more defined boundary. Single women seem to yearn for something more than just physical release. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No emotional connection needed. Attraction though….yes." This! I need to be attracted to the person, have good chemistry with them, but I also like to feel respected and treated like a person rather than just a hole to fuck. This can only be achieved by talking to me in a club, establishing connection rather than just trying to touch me when I'm not looking. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask because I got stung. I was happy to do something without a connection. someone was nurturing something in me for their own gratification. I was being given the impression it was something more whereas in fact the person was just an emotional vampire. Hence, it appears at first glance, most of the single women require some sort of validating of themselves first before they give our the goods!" So one person makes all women the same. Ok then | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"OP, if your profile text is remotely accurate then you have an unusual way of trying to make friends. J" By being honest? What would you prefer a mask and bullshit? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask because I got stung. I was happy to do something without a connection. someone was nurturing something in me for their own gratification. I was being given the impression it was something more whereas in fact the person was just an emotional vampire. Hence, it appears at first glance, most of the single women require some sort of validating of themselves first before they give our the goods! So one person makes all women the same. Ok then " You see it on the profiles..."need an emotional connection yada yada yada...." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask because I got stung. I was happy to do something without a connection. someone was nurturing something in me for their own gratification. I was being given the impression it was something more whereas in fact the person was just an emotional vampire. Hence, it appears at first glance, most of the single women require some sort of validating of themselves first before they give our the goods!" LOL | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Can't women just fuck recreationally? Na, not how they work. I'm inclined to agree, where those whom say men get emotionally involved, I say this; I think women lure the men into a false sense of emotional involvement whereas the truth is women just can't fuck like blowing theiy nose in a handkerchief!" If you agree with that then you don’t understand women When some pro athlete or rapper picks 5 girls out of the crowd and brings them backstage to fuck and chuck, do you think it’s because they had an emotional connection? Women aren’t that different from men. They will just fuck if you’re hot enough. And if your not experiencing that, it’s because you don’t meet the criteria | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"OP, if your profile text is remotely accurate then you have an unusual way of trying to make friends. J By being honest? What would you prefer a mask and bullshit?" Not at all. Just there is a big difference between Why do women need? And Do women need? One approach feels like a generalisation and rather attacking. The other starts a conversation. J | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Can't women just fuck recreationally? Na, not how they work. I'm inclined to agree, where those whom say men get emotionally involved, I say this; I think women lure the men into a false sense of emotional involvement whereas the truth is women just can't fuck like blowing theiy nose in a handkerchief! If you agree with that then you don’t understand women When some pro athlete or rapper picks 5 girls out of the crowd and brings them backstage to fuck and chuck, do you think it’s because they had an emotional connection? Women aren’t that different from men. They will just fuck if you’re hot enough. And if your not experiencing that, it’s because you don’t meet the criteria " They fuck rappers for the status and drugs and an opportunity to get in on more of the action. They're not doing it for the rapper! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Can't women just fuck recreationally?" That's a HUGE assumption on your part. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask because I got stung. I was happy to do something without a connection. someone was nurturing something in me for their own gratification. I was being given the impression it was something more whereas in fact the person was just an emotional vampire. Hence, it appears at first glance, most of the single women require some sort of validating of themselves first before they give our the goods!" You make it sound like a supermarket transaction.....I'm not a clubcard, this ain't Tesco... I'm more middle aisle of Lidls | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Can't women just fuck recreationally?" Yes we can dont generalise . I dont have to have an emotional connection it’s about pleasure | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"OP, if your profile text is remotely accurate then you have an unusual way of trying to make friends. J By being honest? What would you prefer a mask and bullshit? Not at all. Just there is a big difference between Why do women need? And Do women need? One approach feels like a generalisation and rather attacking. The other starts a conversation. J" Well it seemed to work and I must confess, I did give the topic some thought, so I am guilty of being an agent provacateur. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Can't women just fuck recreationally? Na, not how they work. I'm inclined to agree, where those whom say men get emotionally involved, I say this; I think women lure the men into a false sense of emotional involvement whereas the truth is women just can't fuck like blowing theiy nose in a handkerchief! If you agree with that then you don’t understand women When some pro athlete or rapper picks 5 girls out of the crowd and brings them backstage to fuck and chuck, do you think it’s because they had an emotional connection? Women aren’t that different from men. They will just fuck if you’re hot enough. And if your not experiencing that, it’s because you don’t meet the criteria " Harsh but true. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Women absolutely can, if your hot enough Go find a really tall good looking gym guy with tattoos, ask him how many women he’s fucked in a club toilet without an emotional connection " Is it always the same toilet ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Can't women just fuck recreationally? Yes we can dont generalise . I dont have to have an emotional connection it’s about pleasure " Read above about couples....more defined boundaries mentioned. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Women absolutely can, if your hot enough Go find a really tall good looking gym guy with tattoos, ask him how many women he’s fucked in a club toilet without an emotional connection Not great news for unattractive men wanting a hole to fuck. That’s what balaclava’s and glory holes are for, apparently " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Can't women just fuck recreationally? Na, not how they work. I'm inclined to agree, where those whom say men get emotionally involved, I say this; I think women lure the men into a false sense of emotional involvement whereas the truth is women just can't fuck like blowing theiy nose in a handkerchief! If you agree with that then you don’t understand women When some pro athlete or rapper picks 5 girls out of the crowd and brings them backstage to fuck and chuck, do you think it’s because they had an emotional connection? Women aren’t that different from men. They will just fuck if you’re hot enough. And if your not experiencing that, it’s because you don’t meet the criteria They fuck rappers for the status and drugs and an opportunity to get in on more of the action. They're not doing it for the rapper!" For your age, you are naive I bet most of the women you know have fucked a guy within an hour of meeting him with no emotional connection They just don’t tell you that | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Can't women just fuck recreationally?" Everyone is different, gender is irrelevant | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Can't women just fuck recreationally?" What do you mean 'recreationally'? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask because I got stung. I was happy to do something without a connection. someone was nurturing something in me for their own gratification. I was being given the impression it was something more whereas in fact the person was just an emotional vampire. Hence, it appears at first glance, most of the single women require some sort of validating of themselves first before they give our the goods!" what on earth is an emotional vampire? Can someone smarter than me explain? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"[Removed by poster at 01/12/23 08:00:05]" By MrFoxAndXenoFind posts by MrFoxAndXeno Couple just this minute! Weymouth OP, I can't quite believe you're banging this drum about women when your entire profile laments not having an emotional connection with one! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Women absolutely can, if your hot enough Go find a really tall good looking gym guy with tattoos, ask him how many women he’s fucked in a club toilet without an emotional connection Not great news for unattractive men wanting a hole to fuck. It’s something all men should learn and accept, preferably through experience That girl that needs a few socials before you can hook up sucked a guy in the toilet after 4 words at a club Welcome to reality lads " I miss her | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Women absolutely can, if your hot enough Go find a really tall good looking gym guy with tattoos, ask him how many women he’s fucked in a club toilet without an emotional connection Not great news for unattractive men wanting a hole to fuck. It’s something all men should learn and accept, preferably through experience That girl that needs a few socials before you can hook up sucked a guy in the toilet after 4 words at a club Welcome to reality lads I miss her " I’m still here | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"[Removed by poster at 01/12/23 08:00:05] By MrFoxAndXenoFind posts by MrFoxAndXeno Couple just this minute! Weymouth OP, I can't quite believe you're banging this drum about women when your entire profile laments not having an emotional connection with one! " that's a big assumption... I'm lonely - not seeking a partner. you assume too much, comprehend incorrectly. I'm after friendship. that boat you suggest has sailed! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask because I got stung. I was happy to do something without a connection. someone was nurturing something in me for their own gratification. I was being given the impression it was something more whereas in fact the person was just an emotional vampire. Hence, it appears at first glance, most of the single women require some sort of validating of themselves first before they give our the goods! what on earth is an emotional vampire? Can someone smarter than me explain? " Think he’s maybe encountered a succubus, “It Doesn't Help That Underneath Our Clothes, Our Entire Bodies Are Covered In Scales." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"[Removed by poster at 01/12/23 08:00:05] By MrFoxAndXenoFind posts by MrFoxAndXeno Couple just this minute! Weymouth OP, I can't quite believe you're banging this drum about women when your entire profile laments not having an emotional connection with one! that's a big assumption... I'm lonely - not seeking a partner. you assume too much, comprehend incorrectly. I'm after friendship. that boat you suggest has sailed!" All joking aside, it’s not nice to hear anyone is lonely OP! Hope your ok, hard time of year but please don’t assume or judge all women are the same and want the same things from Fab or elsewhere. Hope find what you are looking for, each individual person is very different. The world would be very boring if all the same | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Women absolutely can, if your hot enough Go find a really tall good looking gym guy with tattoos, ask him how many women he’s fucked in a club toilet without an emotional connection Not great news for unattractive men wanting a hole to fuck. It’s something all men should learn and accept, preferably through experience That girl that needs a few socials before you can hook up sucked a guy in the toilet after 4 words at a club Welcome to reality lads I miss her I’m still here " Call me! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"OP, if your profile text is remotely accurate then you have an unusual way of trying to make friends. J By being honest? What would you prefer a mask and bullshit? Not at all. Just there is a big difference between Why do women need? And Do women need? One approach feels like a generalisation and rather attacking. The other starts a conversation. J Well it seemed to work and I must confess, I did give the topic some thought, so I am guilty of being an agent provacateur." In that case, I suppose it depends on the sort of friends you want. Getting people to argue on the Internet is easy. Making friends not so much. I'm out of this thread now. J | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Not all women do and personally I avoid those types. I need some connection to have good sex" I'll be following your lead in future...my lesson well and truly learned! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Why do men get annoyed when a woman won't have sex on his terms" • I suspect for the same reason ·some· women go thermonuclear when we refuse to bow to their unreasonable demands. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Not really about gender is it? Some like it and can and some don't. " The most true and sensible comment here | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask because I got stung. I was happy to do something without a connection. someone was nurturing something in me for their own gratification. I was being given the impression it was something more whereas in fact the person was just an emotional vampire. Hence, it appears at first glance, most of the single women require some sort of validating of themselves first before they give our the goods!" Give up the goods? Is that really how you see it? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think some people mistake an emotional connection for respect, communication and actually wanting to know their name first. I can fuck quite happily without getting attached or connecting but I don't just give that to anyone. This And approach is very very important !! " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Not really about gender is it? Some like it and can and some don't. " THREAD CLOSED | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Not really about gender is it? Some like it and can and some don't. THREAD CLOSED" Indeed | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask because I got stung. I was happy to do something without a connection. someone was nurturing something in me for their own gratification. I was being given the impression it was something more whereas in fact the person was just an emotional vampire. Hence, it appears at first glance, most of the single women require some sort of validating of themselves first before they give our the goods! Give up the goods? Is that really how you see it?" Well, since women are the gatekeepers to sex, yeah. The that's the point of the entire thread! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The wife has no emotional feelings or feel a link or anything with the guys we meet up with. She literally tells me when we meet for me to choose someone. Last time we had a hole session n she never even saw the guy until he finished n just before he left, she kept a blindfold on all the time" I hadn't thought about that scenario. The same with ganbangs I guess, just the whole atmosphere and fulfilling of a fantasy is enough. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The wife has no emotional feelings or feel a link or anything with the guys we meet up with. She literally tells me when we meet for me to choose someone. Last time we had a hole session n she never even saw the guy until he finished n just before he left, she kept a blindfold on all the time" The couples thing has been covered multiple times. The women who are in couples seem to be good with just the recreational aspect since the emotional aspect is already covered indoors with the old man! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Can't women just fuck recreationally? Na, not how they work. I'm inclined to agree, where those whom say men get emotionally involved, I say this; I think women lure the men into a false sense of emotional involvement whereas the truth is women just can't fuck like blowing theiy nose in a handkerchief!" To be honest and I don't blame them, they want a fuck to last longer than that.. As comparisons go its a bit niche but hey.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask because I got stung. I was happy to do something without a connection. someone was nurturing something in me for their own gratification. I was being given the impression it was something more whereas in fact the person was just an emotional vampire. Hence, it appears at first glance, most of the single women require some sort of validating of themselves first before they give our the goods! Give up the goods? Is that really how you see it? Well, since women are the gatekeepers to sex, yeah. The that's the point of the entire thread!" Gatekeepers to sex? Really? I don't get that at all. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask because I got stung. I was happy to do something without a connection. someone was nurturing something in me for their own gratification. I was being given the impression it was something more whereas in fact the person was just an emotional vampire. Hence, it appears at first glance, most of the single women require some sort of validating of themselves first before they give our the goods! Give up the goods? Is that really how you see it? Well, since women are the gatekeepers to sex, yeah. The that's the point of the entire thread! Gatekeepers to sex? Really? I don't get that at all. " I don’t either. It’s never been the case in my life | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The wife has no emotional feelings or feel a link or anything with the guys we meet up with. She literally tells me when we meet for me to choose someone. Last time we had a hole session n she never even saw the guy until he finished n just before he left, she kept a blindfold on all the time I hadn't thought about that scenario. The same with ganbangs I guess, just the whole atmosphere and fulfilling of a fantasy is enough. " Yep - horses for courses. In clubs or a GB I'm just there in the moment enjoying those hands, tongues and cocks. One on one - occsiinally a smash and dash is all I want. Usually I want chemistry, respect, desire, sexual compatibility. An emotional connection is definitely not required | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The wife has no emotional feelings or feel a link or anything with the guys we meet up with. She literally tells me when we meet for me to choose someone. Last time we had a hole session n she never even saw the guy until he finished n just before he left, she kept a blindfold on all the time I hadn't thought about that scenario. The same with ganbangs I guess, just the whole atmosphere and fulfilling of a fantasy is enough. Yep - horses for courses. In clubs or a GB I'm just there in the moment enjoying those hands, tongues and cocks. One on one - occsiinally a smash and dash is all I want. Usually I want chemistry, respect, desire, sexual compatibility. An emotional connection is definitely not required " Sounds reasonable to me. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask because I got stung. I was happy to do something without a connection. someone was nurturing something in me for their own gratification. I was being given the impression it was something more whereas in fact the person was just an emotional vampire. Hence, it appears at first glance, most of the single women require some sort of validating of themselves first before they give our the goods! Give up the goods? Is that really how you see it? Well, since women are the gatekeepers to sex, yeah. The that's the point of the entire thread! Gatekeepers to sex? Really? I don't get that at all. " Nothing negative about it at all. succinct and to the point. Women are the gatekeepers to sex and men are the gatekeepers to relationships. Not my words a Dr in psychology's words. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask because I got stung. I was happy to do something without a connection. someone was nurturing something in me for their own gratification. I was being given the impression it was something more whereas in fact the person was just an emotional vampire. Hence, it appears at first glance, most of the single women require some sort of validating of themselves first before they give our the goods! Give up the goods? Is that really how you see it? Well, since women are the gatekeepers to sex, yeah. The that's the point of the entire thread! Gatekeepers to sex? Really? I don't get that at all. Nothing negative about it at all. succinct and to the point. Women are the gatekeepers to sex and men are the gatekeepers to relationships. Not my words a Dr in psychology's words. " Which doctor was that? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask because I got stung. I was happy to do something without a connection. someone was nurturing something in me for their own gratification. I was being given the impression it was something more whereas in fact the person was just an emotional vampire. Hence, it appears at first glance, most of the single women require some sort of validating of themselves first before they give our the goods! Give up the goods? Is that really how you see it? Well, since women are the gatekeepers to sex, yeah. The that's the point of the entire thread! Gatekeepers to sex? Really? I don't get that at all. Nothing negative about it at all. succinct and to the point. Women are the gatekeepers to sex and men are the gatekeepers to relationships. Not my words a Dr in psychology's words. Which doctor was that?" I do not recall off the top of my head. I wasn't prepared to give references in a forum thread. I remember it distinctly though being said in the topic being discussed. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask because I got stung. I was happy to do something without a connection. someone was nurturing something in me for their own gratification. I was being given the impression it was something more whereas in fact the person was just an emotional vampire. Hence, it appears at first glance, most of the single women require some sort of validating of themselves first before they give our the goods! Give up the goods? Is that really how you see it? Well, since women are the gatekeepers to sex, yeah. The that's the point of the entire thread! Gatekeepers to sex? Really? I don't get that at all. I don’t either. It’s never been the case in my life " I imagine you’ve turned down sex more in your life than most men, that’s all it means really. Most men want sex (many want it with any women willing) and it’s the women saying yes or no | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Can't women just fuck recreationally?" Honest question and I guess it’s from your experiences especially combined with the strange “giving up the goods” comment. But do you honestly believe women can’t have sex for fun ? It’s covered by the 70’s racey song lyrics below although girls is probably better replaced with women in 2023 “Some girls will, some girls won't Some girls need a lot of lovin' and some girls don't” Find the right woman, treat her well (not money related) and she’ll want as much fun sex as you or more. If she thinks you only want her “goods” and not the whole of her you’ll be lucky to get laid at all !! Only my thoughts and I’m probably wrong | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask because I got stung. I was happy to do something without a connection. someone was nurturing something in me for their own gratification. I was being given the impression it was something more whereas in fact the person was just an emotional vampire. Hence, it appears at first glance, most of the single women require some sort of validating of themselves first before they give our the goods! Give up the goods? Is that really how you see it? Well, since women are the gatekeepers to sex, yeah. The that's the point of the entire thread! Gatekeepers to sex? Really? I don't get that at all. Nothing negative about it at all. succinct and to the point. Women are the gatekeepers to sex and men are the gatekeepers to relationships. Not my words a Dr in psychology's words. Which doctor was that? I do not recall off the top of my head. I wasn't prepared to give references in a forum thread. I remember it distinctly though being said in the topic being discussed." Humsn relationships are more than the theory of a nameless doctor. I've heard this theory before summed up by Billy Connolly 'women need to feel loved to have sex and men need to have sex to feel loved'. I think all men and women need to do is stop thinking in stereotypes and just communicate with each other. It's not that difficult | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask because I got stung. I was happy to do something without a connection. someone was nurturing something in me for their own gratification. I was being given the impression it was something more whereas in fact the person was just an emotional vampire. Hence, it appears at first glance, most of the single women require some sort of validating of themselves first before they give our the goods! Give up the goods? Is that really how you see it? Well, since women are the gatekeepers to sex, yeah. The that's the point of the entire thread! Gatekeepers to sex? Really? I don't get that at all. I don’t either. It’s never been the case in my life I imagine you’ve turned down sex more in your life than most men, that’s all it means really. Most men want sex (many want it with any women willing) and it’s the women saying yes or no " Can’t remember ever turning down sex with someone I’m with. Messages on here don’t exactly count! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Can't women just fuck recreationally?" some can most can't ce la vie | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Can't women just fuck recreationally?" Well, I am not a sex toy so yeah I need to have a connection/chemistry. Lina. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask because I got stung. I was happy to do something without a connection. someone was nurturing something in me for their own gratification. I was being given the impression it was something more whereas in fact the person was just an emotional vampire. Hence, it appears at first glance, most of the single women require some sort of validating of themselves first before they give our the goods! Give up the goods? Is that really how you see it? Well, since women are the gatekeepers to sex, yeah. The that's the point of the entire thread! Gatekeepers to sex? Really? I don't get that at all. I don’t either. It’s never been the case in my life I imagine you’ve turned down sex more in your life than most men, that’s all it means really. Most men want sex (many want it with any women willing) and it’s the women saying yes or no Can’t remember ever turning down sex with someone I’m with. Messages on here don’t exactly count!" They still count. Just because it’s a no from you doesn’t mean it didn’t happen. It’s the same how guys are expected to make all the first moves. Guys make the move, women decide whether to accept it or not. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Can’t remember ever turning down sex with someone I’m with. Messages on here don’t exactly count!" I have probably said no to relationships with people I see more than I've said no to sex with them. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Can't women just fuck recreationally?" Yes plenty can and do. I was at a party last weekend and lots were doing just that Shock horror some were even fucking or sucking a cock without even talking to the man in question beforehand | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask because I got stung. I was happy to do something without a connection. someone was nurturing something in me for their own gratification. I was being given the impression it was something more whereas in fact the person was just an emotional vampire. Hence, it appears at first glance, most of the single women require some sort of validating of themselves first before they give our the goods! Give up the goods? Is that really how you see it? Well, since women are the gatekeepers to sex, yeah. The that's the point of the entire thread!" Explain how women are the 'gatekeepers' to sex, from your own perspective. Please. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask because I got stung. I was happy to do something without a connection. someone was nurturing something in me for their own gratification. I was being given the impression it was something more whereas in fact the person was just an emotional vampire. Hence, it appears at first glance, most of the single women require some sort of validating of themselves first before they give our the goods! Give up the goods? Is that really how you see it? Well, since women are the gatekeepers to sex, yeah. The that's the point of the entire thread! Gatekeepers to sex? Really? I don't get that at all. Nothing negative about it at all. succinct and to the point. Women are the gatekeepers to sex and men are the gatekeepers to relationships. Not my words a Dr in psychology's words. Which doctor was that? I do not recall off the top of my head. I wasn't prepared to give references in a forum thread. I remember it distinctly though being said in the topic being discussed. Humsn relationships are more than the theory of a nameless doctor. I've heard this theory before summed up by Billy Connolly 'women need to feel loved to have sex and men need to have sex to feel loved'. I think all men and women need to do is stop thinking in stereotypes and just communicate with each other. It's not that difficult " I’m with you on that! I’d listen to Uncle Billy more than a psychiatrist! Other wise words include, “if it wasn’t for your wellies, where would you be” and “never take an eejit with you, you can always pick one up when you get there” The older I get, the more I understand these phrases | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask because I got stung. I was happy to do something without a connection. someone was nurturing something in me for their own gratification. I was being given the impression it was something more whereas in fact the person was just an emotional vampire. Hence, it appears at first glance, most of the single women require some sort of validating of themselves first before they give our the goods! Give up the goods? Is that really how you see it? Well, since women are the gatekeepers to sex, yeah. The that's the point of the entire thread! Gatekeepers to sex? Really? I don't get that at all. Nothing negative about it at all. succinct and to the point. Women are the gatekeepers to sex and men are the gatekeepers to relationships. Not my words a Dr in psychology's words. " I have to disagree. That makes it sound like women can get sex whenever they want. That really is not true. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask because I got stung. I was happy to do something without a connection. someone was nurturing something in me for their own gratification. I was being given the impression it was something more whereas in fact the person was just an emotional vampire. Hence, it appears at first glance, most of the single women require some sort of validating of themselves first before they give our the goods! Give up the goods? Is that really how you see it? Well, since women are the gatekeepers to sex, yeah. The that's the point of the entire thread! Gatekeepers to sex? Really? I don't get that at all. Nothing negative about it at all. succinct and to the point. Women are the gatekeepers to sex and men are the gatekeepers to relationships. Not my words a Dr in psychology's words. Which doctor was that? I do not recall off the top of my head. I wasn't prepared to give references in a forum thread. I remember it distinctly though being said in the topic being discussed. Humsn relationships are more than the theory of a nameless doctor. I've heard this theory before summed up by Billy Connolly 'women need to feel loved to have sex and men need to have sex to feel loved'. I think all men and women need to do is stop thinking in stereotypes and just communicate with each other. It's not that difficult I’m with you on that! I’d listen to Uncle Billy more than a psychiatrist! Other wise words include, “if it wasn’t for your wellies, where would you be” and “never take an eejit with you, you can always pick one up when you get there” The older I get, the more I understand these phrases " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask because I got stung. I was happy to do something without a connection. someone was nurturing something in me for their own gratification. I was being given the impression it was something more whereas in fact the person was just an emotional vampire. Hence, it appears at first glance, most of the single women require some sort of validating of themselves first before they give our the goods! Give up the goods? Is that really how you see it? Well, since women are the gatekeepers to sex, yeah. The that's the point of the entire thread! Explain how women are the 'gatekeepers' to sex, from your own perspective. Please. " If they weren't gatekeepers then a criminal act would have taken place. in summary - consent! simple enough? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask because I got stung. I was happy to do something without a connection. someone was nurturing something in me for their own gratification. I was being given the impression it was something more whereas in fact the person was just an emotional vampire. Hence, it appears at first glance, most of the single women require some sort of validating of themselves first before they give our the goods! Give up the goods? Is that really how you see it? Well, since women are the gatekeepers to sex, yeah. The that's the point of the entire thread! Explain how women are the 'gatekeepers' to sex, from your own perspective. Please. If they weren't gatekeepers then a criminal act would have taken place. in summary - consent! simple enough?" I wasn't thinking that way, I was thinking more about finding a Willing partner. Men can also be sexually abused too though you know. If a man said no and a woman continued, that is also about consent too. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask because I got stung. I was happy to do something without a connection. someone was nurturing something in me for their own gratification. I was being given the impression it was something more whereas in fact the person was just an emotional vampire. Hence, it appears at first glance, most of the single women require some sort of validating of themselves first before they give our the goods! Give up the goods? Is that really how you see it? Well, since women are the gatekeepers to sex, yeah. The that's the point of the entire thread! Gatekeepers to sex? Really? I don't get that at all. Nothing negative about it at all. succinct and to the point. Women are the gatekeepers to sex and men are the gatekeepers to relationships. Not my words a Dr in psychology's words. I have to disagree. That makes it sound like women can get sex whenever they want. That really is not true." I think you mean you can’t get sex whenever you want, from someone you want to have sex with You could absolutely have sex whenever you want, just not with people you find desirable | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Women absolutely can, if your hot enough Go find a really tall good looking gym guy with tattoos, ask him how many women he’s fucked in a club toilet without an emotional connection Not great news for unattractive men wanting a hole to fuck. " If any man refers to any woman as 'a hole to fuck' he doesn't deserve any attention regardless of how he looks. We don't need emotions but we do want respect. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask because I got stung. I was happy to do something without a connection. someone was nurturing something in me for their own gratification. I was being given the impression it was something more whereas in fact the person was just an emotional vampire. Hence, it appears at first glance, most of the single women require some sort of validating of themselves first before they give our the goods! Give up the goods? Is that really how you see it? Well, since women are the gatekeepers to sex, yeah. The that's the point of the entire thread! Explain how women are the 'gatekeepers' to sex, from your own perspective. Please. If they weren't gatekeepers then a criminal act would have taken place. in summary - consent! simple enough?" You know men can be assault too right? Consent is a 2 way street | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask because I got stung. I was happy to do something without a connection. someone was nurturing something in me for their own gratification. I was being given the impression it was something more whereas in fact the person was just an emotional vampire. Hence, it appears at first glance, most of the single women require some sort of validating of themselves first before they give our the goods! what on earth is an emotional vampire? Can someone smarter than me explain? " Yes Don I can. Emotion = Feelings Vampire = Parasitic Creature that lives by sucking the fucking life out of others - (substitute emotions/feelings for blood ) You could put it in easier terms and just say someone is 'NEEDY' or DEMANDING and fails to see they are sapping your energy and leaving you depleted. A bit like syphoning petrol from your mates car.... sommat fills up cos it empties sommat else. You are welcome Don. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask because I got stung. I was happy to do something without a connection. someone was nurturing something in me for their own gratification. I was being given the impression it was something more whereas in fact the person was just an emotional vampire. Hence, it appears at first glance, most of the single women require some sort of validating of themselves first before they give our the goods! Give up the goods? Is that really how you see it? Well, since women are the gatekeepers to sex, yeah. The that's the point of the entire thread! Explain how women are the 'gatekeepers' to sex, from your own perspective. Please. If they weren't gatekeepers then a criminal act would have taken place. in summary - consent! simple enough?" Talking about bodily autonomy as gatekeeping sounds wrong to me. You know that women are perfectly within their rights to decide the terms under which they have sex and men are within their rights to refuse those terms, don't you. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask because I got stung. I was happy to do something without a connection. someone was nurturing something in me for their own gratification. I was being given the impression it was something more whereas in fact the person was just an emotional vampire. Hence, it appears at first glance, most of the single women require some sort of validating of themselves first before they give our the goods! Give up the goods? Is that really how you see it? Well, since women are the gatekeepers to sex, yeah. The that's the point of the entire thread! Gatekeepers to sex? Really? I don't get that at all. Nothing negative about it at all. succinct and to the point. Women are the gatekeepers to sex and men are the gatekeepers to relationships. Not my words a Dr in psychology's words. I have to disagree. That makes it sound like women can get sex whenever they want. That really is not true. I think you mean you can’t get sex whenever you want, from someone you want to have sex with You could absolutely have sex whenever you want, just not with people you find desirable " I'm astounded that you really believe that. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask because I got stung. I was happy to do something without a connection. someone was nurturing something in me for their own gratification. I was being given the impression it was something more whereas in fact the person was just an emotional vampire. Hence, it appears at first glance, most of the single women require some sort of validating of themselves first before they give our the goods! Give up the goods? Is that really how you see it? Well, since women are the gatekeepers to sex, yeah. The that's the point of the entire thread! Explain how women are the 'gatekeepers' to sex, from your own perspective. Please. If they weren't gatekeepers then a criminal act would have taken place. in summary - consent! simple enough?" Perhaps more simple than you need to be. You haven't answered my question at all. You have made a statement which implies something else entirely. Why do you call women the gatekeepers of sex ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask because I got stung. I was happy to do something without a connection. someone was nurturing something in me for their own gratification. I was being given the impression it was something more whereas in fact the person was just an emotional vampire. Hence, it appears at first glance, most of the single women require some sort of validating of themselves first before they give our the goods! Give up the goods? Is that really how you see it? Well, since women are the gatekeepers to sex, yeah. The that's the point of the entire thread! Gatekeepers to sex? Really? I don't get that at all. Nothing negative about it at all. succinct and to the point. Women are the gatekeepers to sex and men are the gatekeepers to relationships. Not my words a Dr in psychology's words. I have to disagree. That makes it sound like women can get sex whenever they want. That really is not true. I think you mean you can’t get sex whenever you want, from someone you want to have sex with You could absolutely have sex whenever you want, just not with people you find desirable I'm astounded that you really believe that." I’m astounded you don’t realise that. Put your address on fab status and that your willing to suck/fuck anyone that turns up, you’ll have a queue outside your house It’s completely fine to admit you can get sex when ever but you have high standards. There’s no need to lie about the reality that most men are down to fuck pretty much always, it’s not a negative thing about you | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I have to disagree. That makes it sound like women can get sex whenever they want. That really is not true. I think you mean you can’t get sex whenever you want, from someone you want to have sex with You could absolutely have sex whenever you want, just not with people you find desirable " To be fair, if the men complaining they can't get any would just drop their standards and accept any unwanted noodle for the sake of getting off, they could have sex whenever too | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The emotional intelligence levels on display in this thread is fairly boggling " I actually went to comment but then thought I really can’t be arsed. I think I’m done with this thread. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I have to disagree. That makes it sound like women can get sex whenever they want. That really is not true. I think you mean you can’t get sex whenever you want, from someone you want to have sex with You could absolutely have sex whenever you want, just not with people you find desirable To be fair, if the men complaining they can't get any would just drop their standards and accept any unwanted noodle for the sake of getting off, they could have sex whenever too " Absolutely, no one’s throwing shade, just pointing out reality | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I have to disagree. That makes it sound like women can get sex whenever they want. That really is not true. I think you mean you can’t get sex whenever you want, from someone you want to have sex with You could absolutely have sex whenever you want, just not with people you find desirable To be fair, if the men complaining they can't get any would just drop their standards and accept any unwanted noodle for the sake of getting off, they could have sex whenever too Absolutely, no one’s throwing shade, just pointing out reality " And I can confirm that as a bi guy. Blowjob every night if I want one | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I have to disagree. That makes it sound like women can get sex whenever they want. That really is not true. I think you mean you can’t get sex whenever you want, from someone you want to have sex with You could absolutely have sex whenever you want, just not with people you find desirable To be fair, if the men complaining they can't get any would just drop their standards and accept any unwanted noodle for the sake of getting off, they could have sex whenever too Absolutely, no one’s throwing shade, just pointing out reality " Then how are women the gatekeepers when everyone is capable of having preferences and saying no? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask because I got stung. I was happy to do something without a connection. someone was nurturing something in me for their own gratification. I was being given the impression it was something more whereas in fact the person was just an emotional vampire. Hence, it appears at first glance, most of the single women require some sort of validating of themselves first before they give our the goods!" Validating what? I like a bit of a mind-meld, because the sex is better, and that's what I'm here for. If I wanted to be used as a fuck toy for horny men I'd make a career out of it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I have to disagree. That makes it sound like women can get sex whenever they want. That really is not true. I think you mean you can’t get sex whenever you want, from someone you want to have sex with You could absolutely have sex whenever you want, just not with people you find desirable To be fair, if the men complaining they can't get any would just drop their standards and accept any unwanted noodle for the sake of getting off, they could have sex whenever too Absolutely, no one’s throwing shade, just pointing out reality Then how are women the gatekeepers when everyone is capable of having preferences and saying no?" By the look of it because*some* men say they are. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask because I got stung. I was happy to do something without a connection. someone was nurturing something in me for their own gratification. I was being given the impression it was something more whereas in fact the person was just an emotional vampire. Hence, it appears at first glance, most of the single women require some sort of validating of themselves first before they give our the goods! Give up the goods? Is that really how you see it? Well, since women are the gatekeepers to sex, yeah. The that's the point of the entire thread! Explain how women are the 'gatekeepers' to sex, from your own perspective. Please. If they weren't gatekeepers then a criminal act would have taken place. in summary - consent! simple enough? Perhaps more simple than you need to be. You haven't answered my question at all. You have made a statement which implies something else entirely. Why do you call women the gatekeepers of sex ? " I don't a psychologist did. I just agreed with their analysis in the context and when it comes to sex....women don't give it out unless there's something in it for them and in the case of single women (couples here don't apply for the umpteenth time) it's usually the prelude to a relationship for which men are the gatekeepers of. that'll be the men being all emotional the women here seem to observe bit! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I have to disagree. That makes it sound like women can get sex whenever they want. That really is not true. I think you mean you can’t get sex whenever you want, from someone you want to have sex with You could absolutely have sex whenever you want, just not with people you find desirable To be fair, if the men complaining they can't get any would just drop their standards and accept any unwanted noodle for the sake of getting off, they could have sex whenever too Absolutely, no one’s throwing shade, just pointing out reality Then how are women the gatekeepers when everyone is capable of having preferences and saying no?" Because men are putting yes out there far more than woman, so it’s women having the final yes/no, effectively making them the gatekeeper Although I think the analogy is overly simplified to apply to a general population Let’s be honest, I’m sure no one is gatekeeping sex with professional athletes or musicians or other celebs | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask because I got stung. I was happy to do something without a connection. someone was nurturing something in me for their own gratification. I was being given the impression it was something more whereas in fact the person was just an emotional vampire. Hence, it appears at first glance, most of the single women require some sort of validating of themselves first before they give our the goods! what on earth is an emotional vampire? Can someone smarter than me explain? Yes Don I can. Emotion = Feelings Vampire = Parasitic Creature that lives by sucking the fucking life out of others - (substitute emotions/feelings for blood ) You could put it in easier terms and just say someone is 'NEEDY' or DEMANDING and fails to see they are sapping your energy and leaving you depleted. A bit like syphoning petrol from your mates car.... sommat fills up cos it empties sommat else. You are welcome Don. " thanks | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Can't women just fuck recreationally?" Yes. Yes they can and do. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I have to disagree. That makes it sound like women can get sex whenever they want. That really is not true. I think you mean you can’t get sex whenever you want, from someone you want to have sex with You could absolutely have sex whenever you want, just not with people you find desirable To be fair, if the men complaining they can't get any would just drop their standards and accept any unwanted noodle for the sake of getting off, they could have sex whenever too Absolutely, no one’s throwing shade, just pointing out reality Then how are women the gatekeepers when everyone is capable of having preferences and saying no? Because men are putting yes out there far more than woman, so it’s women having the final yes/no, effectively making them the gatekeeper Although I think the analogy is overly simplified to apply to a general population Let’s be honest, I’m sure no one is gatekeeping sex with professional athletes or musicians or other celebs" Let's be honest? An honest opinion isn't a fact. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I have to disagree. That makes it sound like women can get sex whenever they want. That really is not true. I think you mean you can’t get sex whenever you want, from someone you want to have sex with You could absolutely have sex whenever you want, just not with people you find desirable To be fair, if the men complaining they can't get any would just drop their standards and accept any unwanted noodle for the sake of getting off, they could have sex whenever too Absolutely, no one’s throwing shade, just pointing out reality Then how are women the gatekeepers when everyone is capable of having preferences and saying no? Because men are putting yes out there far more than woman, so it’s women having the final yes/no, effectively making them the gatekeeper Although I think the analogy is overly simplified to apply to a general population Let’s be honest, I’m sure no one is gatekeeping sex with professional athletes or musicians or other celebs" I'm damn sure most of the straight men and women among them would turn me down. Handing the key to the gate, if such a thing exists firmly to them. I might test the theory on someone famous | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask because I got stung. I was happy to do something without a connection. someone was nurturing something in me for their own gratification. I was being given the impression it was something more whereas in fact the person was just an emotional vampire. Hence, it appears at first glance, most of the single women require some sort of validating of themselves first before they give our the goods! Give up the goods? Is that really how you see it? Well, since women are the gatekeepers to sex, yeah. The that's the point of the entire thread! Explain how women are the 'gatekeepers' to sex, from your own perspective. Please. If they weren't gatekeepers then a criminal act would have taken place. in summary - consent! simple enough? Perhaps more simple than you need to be. You haven't answered my question at all. You have made a statement which implies something else entirely. Why do you call women the gatekeepers of sex ? " I don't a psychologist did. I just agreed with their analysis in the context and when it comes to sex....women don't give it out unless there's something in it for them and in the case of single women (couples here don't apply for the umpteenth time) it's usually the prelude to a relationship for which men are the gatekeepers of. that'll be the men being all emotional the women here seem to observe bit! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask because I got stung. I was happy to do something without a connection. someone was nurturing something in me for their own gratification. I was being given the impression it was something more whereas in fact the person was just an emotional vampire. Hence, it appears at first glance, most of the single women require some sort of validating of themselves first before they give our the goods! Give up the goods? Is that really how you see it? Well, since women are the gatekeepers to sex, yeah. The that's the point of the entire thread! Explain how women are the 'gatekeepers' to sex, from your own perspective. Please. If they weren't gatekeepers then a criminal act would have taken place. in summary - consent! simple enough? Perhaps more simple than you need to be. You haven't answered my question at all. You have made a statement which implies something else entirely. Why do you call women the gatekeepers of sex ? I don't a psychologist did. I just agreed with their analysis in the context and when it comes to sex....women don't give it out unless there's something in it for them and in the case of single women (couples here don't apply for the umpteenth time) it's usually the prelude to a relationship for which men are the gatekeepers of. that'll be the men being all emotional the women here seem to observe bit!" Thanks - What's her name ? This psychologist ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"This could be the most depressing thread Ive ever read here. Lack of self awareness, respect for individual autonomy and emotional intelligence is astounding." You've missed the point completely then. thanks for your contribution! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I have to disagree. That makes it sound like women can get sex whenever they want. That really is not true. I think you mean you can’t get sex whenever you want, from someone you want to have sex with You could absolutely have sex whenever you want, just not with people you find desirable To be fair, if the men complaining they can't get any would just drop their standards and accept any unwanted noodle for the sake of getting off, they could have sex whenever too Absolutely, no one’s throwing shade, just pointing out reality Then how are women the gatekeepers when everyone is capable of having preferences and saying no? Because men are putting yes out there far more than woman, so it’s women having the final yes/no, effectively making them the gatekeeper Although I think the analogy is overly simplified to apply to a general population Let’s be honest, I’m sure no one is gatekeeping sex with professional athletes or musicians or other celebs I'm damn sure most of the straight men and women among them would turn me down. Handing the key to the gate, if such a thing exists firmly to them. I might test the theory on someone famous " Maybe, although I bet you still have more pull than 90% of average men | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask because I got stung. I was happy to do something without a connection. someone was nurturing something in me for their own gratification. I was being given the impression it was something more whereas in fact the person was just an emotional vampire. Hence, it appears at first glance, most of the single women require some sort of validating of themselves first before they give our the goods! Give up the goods? Is that really how you see it? Well, since women are the gatekeepers to sex, yeah. The that's the point of the entire thread! Explain how women are the 'gatekeepers' to sex, from your own perspective. Please. If they weren't gatekeepers then a criminal act would have taken place. in summary - consent! simple enough? Perhaps more simple than you need to be. You haven't answered my question at all. You have made a statement which implies something else entirely. Why do you call women the gatekeepers of sex ? I don't a psychologist did. I just agreed with their analysis in the context and when it comes to sex....women don't give it out unless there's something in it for them and in the case of single women (couples here don't apply for the umpteenth time) it's usually the prelude to a relationship for which men are the gatekeepers of. that'll be the men being all emotional the women here seem to observe bit!" Did you really just say women won't give it out unless there is something in it for them? Do you not realise how that sounds? What you have just said is - women won't have sex unless they actually want to and will get some enjoyment out of it. How very dare these women not just spread their legs and lie back to be used! How rude. How dare they gatekeep their own bodies! Honestly, it is truly awful how women have the right not to fuck everyone who wants to stick their penis in them. Almost like they think they are special huh? MrsAbz | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask because I got stung. I was happy to do something without a connection. someone was nurturing something in me for their own gratification. I was being given the impression it was something more whereas in fact the person was just an emotional vampire. Hence, it appears at first glance, most of the single women require some sort of validating of themselves first before they give our the goods! Give up the goods? Is that really how you see it? Well, since women are the gatekeepers to sex, yeah. The that's the point of the entire thread! Explain how women are the 'gatekeepers' to sex, from your own perspective. Please. If they weren't gatekeepers then a criminal act would have taken place. in summary - consent! simple enough? Perhaps more simple than you need to be. You haven't answered my question at all. You have made a statement which implies something else entirely. Why do you call women the gatekeepers of sex ? I don't a psychologist did. I just agreed with their analysis in the context and when it comes to sex....women don't give it out unless there's something in it for them and in the case of single women (couples here don't apply for the umpteenth time) it's usually the prelude to a relationship for which men are the gatekeepers of. that'll be the men being all emotional the women here seem to observe bit! Thanks - What's her name ? This psychologist ? " Sigourney Weaver | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"This could be the most depressing thread Ive ever read here. Lack of self awareness, respect for individual autonomy and emotional intelligence is astounding." What's emotional intelligence ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I have to disagree. That makes it sound like women can get sex whenever they want. That really is not true. I think you mean you can’t get sex whenever you want, from someone you want to have sex with You could absolutely have sex whenever you want, just not with people you find desirable To be fair, if the men complaining they can't get any would just drop their standards and accept any unwanted noodle for the sake of getting off, they could have sex whenever too Absolutely, no one’s throwing shade, just pointing out reality Then how are women the gatekeepers when everyone is capable of having preferences and saying no? Because men are putting yes out there far more than woman, so it’s women having the final yes/no, effectively making them the gatekeeper Although I think the analogy is overly simplified to apply to a general population Let’s be honest, I’m sure no one is gatekeeping sex with professional athletes or musicians or other celebs I'm damn sure most of the straight men and women among them would turn me down. Handing the key to the gate, if such a thing exists firmly to them. I might test the theory on someone famous Maybe, although I bet you still have more pull than 90% of average men " Don't waste your money, you'd lose it. Reality is the space I inhabit | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I have to disagree. That makes it sound like women can get sex whenever they want. That really is not true. I think you mean you can’t get sex whenever you want, from someone you want to have sex with You could absolutely have sex whenever you want, just not with people you find desirable To be fair, if the men complaining they can't get any would just drop their standards and accept any unwanted noodle for the sake of getting off, they could have sex whenever too Absolutely, no one’s throwing shade, just pointing out reality Then how are women the gatekeepers when everyone is capable of having preferences and saying no? Because men are putting yes out there far more than woman, so it’s women having the final yes/no, effectively making them the gatekeeper Although I think the analogy is overly simplified to apply to a general population Let’s be honest, I’m sure no one is gatekeeping sex with professional athletes or musicians or other celebs I'm damn sure most of the straight men and women among them would turn me down. Handing the key to the gate, if such a thing exists firmly to them. I might test the theory on someone famous Maybe, although I bet you still have more pull than 90% of average men Don't waste your money, you'd lose it. Reality is the space I inhabit " I dunno, look at fabs. 99% of guys in here aren’t getting a single meet, not a single message, maybe not even a single reply from sending 100s of messages I’m pretty sure if you made a solo account, you’d do pretty well | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask because I got stung. I was happy to do something without a connection. someone was nurturing something in me for their own gratification. I was being given the impression it was something more whereas in fact the person was just an emotional vampire. Hence, it appears at first glance, most of the single women require some sort of validating of themselves first before they give our the goods! Give up the goods? Is that really how you see it? Well, since women are the gatekeepers to sex, yeah. The that's the point of the entire thread! Explain how women are the 'gatekeepers' to sex, from your own perspective. Please. If they weren't gatekeepers then a criminal act would have taken place. in summary - consent! simple enough? Perhaps more simple than you need to be. You haven't answered my question at all. You have made a statement which implies something else entirely. Why do you call women the gatekeepers of sex ? I don't a psychologist did. I just agreed with their analysis in the context and when it comes to sex....women don't give it out unless there's something in it for them and in the case of single women (couples here don't apply for the umpteenth time) it's usually the prelude to a relationship for which men are the gatekeepers of. that'll be the men being all emotional the women here seem to observe bit! Thanks - What's her name ? This psychologist ? Sigourney Weaver" Behave ! It was David Buss chiefly, if my memory serves me well and it mostly does. It has been developed since then , many times but his work should be read in context cos he didn't mean it to be as literal as is being made out. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask because I got stung. I was happy to do something without a connection. someone was nurturing something in me for their own gratification. I was being given the impression it was something more whereas in fact the person was just an emotional vampire. Hence, it appears at first glance, most of the single women require some sort of validating of themselves first before they give our the goods! Give up the goods? Is that really how you see it? Well, since women are the gatekeepers to sex, yeah. The that's the point of the entire thread! Explain how women are the 'gatekeepers' to sex, from your own perspective. Please. If they weren't gatekeepers then a criminal act would have taken place. in summary - consent! simple enough? Perhaps more simple than you need to be. You haven't answered my question at all. You have made a statement which implies something else entirely. Why do you call women the gatekeepers of sex ? I don't a psychologist did. I just agreed with their analysis in the context and when it comes to sex....women don't give it out unless there's something in it for them and in the case of single women (couples here don't apply for the umpteenth time) it's usually the prelude to a relationship for which men are the gatekeepers of. that'll be the men being all emotional the women here seem to observe bit! Did you really just say women won't give it out unless there is something in it for them? Do you not realise how that sounds? What you have just said is - women won't have sex unless they actually want to and will get some enjoyment out of it. How very dare these women not just spread their legs and lie back to be used! How rude. How dare they gatekeep their own bodies! Honestly, it is truly awful how women have the right not to fuck everyone who wants to stick their penis in them. Almost like they think they are special huh? MrsAbz " TAKEN COMPLETELY OUT OF CONTEXT!!! NO SENSE OF ENTITLEMENT IMPLIED OR INFERRED. The context of the psychologist was in entering relationships....not an entitlement to sex.....but twist it as you like to vilify me! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some of the most naive things I have seen written in a long time. Over the years (out of relationships) we have both had many one night stands, no emotional connections needed or given. Just the need to have that release. Here is a really simple thought that many men need to have drummed into their head. “Not everyone wants to have sex with you.” And perhaps if you spoke to people like it was the last thing on your mind rather than the first, if you stopped looking at women like a challenge, and maybe viewed them as your equal. You may have much more fun along the way." This pretty much sums it up perfectly . | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some of the most naive things I have seen written in a long time. Over the years (out of relationships) we have both had many one night stands, no emotional connections needed or given. Just the need to have that release. Here is a really simple thought that many men need to have drummed into their head. “Not everyone wants to have sex with you.” And perhaps if you spoke to people like it was the last thing on your mind rather than the first, if you stopped looking at women like a challenge, and maybe viewed them as your equal. You may have much more fun along the way." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I have to disagree. That makes it sound like women can get sex whenever they want. That really is not true. I think you mean you can’t get sex whenever you want, from someone you want to have sex with You could absolutely have sex whenever you want, just not with people you find desirable To be fair, if the men complaining they can't get any would just drop their standards and accept any unwanted noodle for the sake of getting off, they could have sex whenever too Absolutely, no one’s throwing shade, just pointing out reality Then how are women the gatekeepers when everyone is capable of having preferences and saying no? Because men are putting yes out there far more than woman, so it’s women having the final yes/no, effectively making them the gatekeeper Although I think the analogy is overly simplified to apply to a general population Let’s be honest, I’m sure no one is gatekeeping sex with professional athletes or musicians or other celebs I'm damn sure most of the straight men and women among them would turn me down. Handing the key to the gate, if such a thing exists firmly to them. I might test the theory on someone famous Maybe, although I bet you still have more pull than 90% of average men Don't waste your money, you'd lose it. Reality is the space I inhabit I dunno, look at fabs. 99% of guys in here aren’t getting a single meet, not a single message, maybe not even a single reply from sending 100s of messages I’m pretty sure if you made a solo account, you’d do pretty well " From experience I know that's not so. : generalisation alert: Men my age want younger women, younger men want older women who don't look or act old. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some of the most naive things I have seen written in a long time. Over the years (out of relationships) we have both had many one night stands, no emotional connections needed or given. Just the need to have that release. Here is a really simple thought that many men need to have drummed into their head. “Not everyone wants to have sex with you.” And perhaps if you spoke to people like it was the last thing on your mind rather than the first, if you stopped looking at women like a challenge, and maybe viewed them as your equal. You may have much more fun along the way. " Oh how ironic!!!!! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I have to disagree. That makes it sound like women can get sex whenever they want. That really is not true. I think you mean you can’t get sex whenever you want, from someone you want to have sex with You could absolutely have sex whenever you want, just not with people you find desirable To be fair, if the men complaining they can't get any would just drop their standards and accept any unwanted noodle for the sake of getting off, they could have sex whenever too Absolutely, no one’s throwing shade, just pointing out reality Then how are women the gatekeepers when everyone is capable of having preferences and saying no? Because men are putting yes out there far more than woman, so it’s women having the final yes/no, effectively making them the gatekeeper Although I think the analogy is overly simplified to apply to a general population Let’s be honest, I’m sure no one is gatekeeping sex with professional athletes or musicians or other celebs I'm damn sure most of the straight men and women among them would turn me down. Handing the key to the gate, if such a thing exists firmly to them. I might test the theory on someone famous Maybe, although I bet you still have more pull than 90% of average men Don't waste your money, you'd lose it. Reality is the space I inhabit I dunno, look at fabs. 99% of guys in here aren’t getting a single meet, not a single message, maybe not even a single reply from sending 100s of messages I’m pretty sure if you made a solo account, you’d do pretty well From experience I know that's not so. : generalisation alert: Men my age want younger women, younger men want older women who don't look or act old..... " .... who know what they want.... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some of the most naive things I have seen written in a long time. Over the years (out of relationships) we have both had many one night stands, no emotional connections needed or given. Just the need to have that release. Here is a really simple thought that many men need to have drummed into their head. “Not everyone wants to have sex with you.” And perhaps if you spoke to people like it was the last thing on your mind rather than the first, if you stopped looking at women like a challenge, and maybe viewed them as your equal. You may have much more fun along the way. Oh how ironic!!!!!" Explain ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I have to disagree. That makes it sound like women can get sex whenever they want. That really is not true. I think you mean you can’t get sex whenever you want, from someone you want to have sex with You could absolutely have sex whenever you want, just not with people you find desirable To be fair, if the men complaining they can't get any would just drop their standards and accept any unwanted noodle for the sake of getting off, they could have sex whenever too Absolutely, no one’s throwing shade, just pointing out reality Then how are women the gatekeepers when everyone is capable of having preferences and saying no? Because men are putting yes out there far more than woman, so it’s women having the final yes/no, effectively making them the gatekeeper Although I think the analogy is overly simplified to apply to a general population Let’s be honest, I’m sure no one is gatekeeping sex with professional athletes or musicians or other celebs I'm damn sure most of the straight men and women among them would turn me down. Handing the key to the gate, if such a thing exists firmly to them. I might test the theory on someone famous Maybe, although I bet you still have more pull than 90% of average men Don't waste your money, you'd lose it. Reality is the space I inhabit I dunno, look at fabs. 99% of guys in here aren’t getting a single meet, not a single message, maybe not even a single reply from sending 100s of messages I’m pretty sure if you made a solo account, you’d do pretty well From experience I know that's not so. : generalisation alert: Men my age want younger women, younger men want older women who don't look or act old..... .... who know what they want.... " ...and how to get it... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask because I got stung. I was happy to do something without a connection. someone was nurturing something in me for their own gratification. I was being given the impression it was something more whereas in fact the person was just an emotional vampire. Hence, it appears at first glance, most of the single women require some sort of validating of themselves first before they give our the goods! Give up the goods? Is that really how you see it? Well, since women are the gatekeepers to sex, yeah. The that's the point of the entire thread! Explain how women are the 'gatekeepers' to sex, from your own perspective. Please. If they weren't gatekeepers then a criminal act would have taken place. in summary - consent! simple enough? Perhaps more simple than you need to be. You haven't answered my question at all. You have made a statement which implies something else entirely. Why do you call women the gatekeepers of sex ? I don't a psychologist did. I just agreed with their analysis in the context and when it comes to sex....women don't give it out unless there's something in it for them and in the case of single women (couples here don't apply for the umpteenth time) it's usually the prelude to a relationship for which men are the gatekeepers of. that'll be the men being all emotional the women here seem to observe bit! Thanks - What's her name ? This psychologist ? Sigourney Weaver Behave ! It was David Buss chiefly, if my memory serves me well and it mostly does. It has been developed since then , many times but his work should be read in context cos he didn't mean it to be as literal as is being made out." Sorry granny my natural response is humour. Had a wee read and you are 100%. So can we all agree that Fab needs a photo verification, a psych evaluation and an emotional stability Check now before joining. Some scary reading on this thread, makes you ponder a few things…. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some of the most naive things I have seen written in a long time. Over the years (out of relationships) we have both had many one night stands, no emotional connections needed or given. Just the need to have that release. Here is a really simple thought that many men need to have drummed into their head. “Not everyone wants to have sex with you.” And perhaps if you spoke to people like it was the last thing on your mind rather than the first, if you stopped looking at women like a challenge, and maybe viewed them as your equal. You may have much more fun along the way." The 'she is just there for me to dump my muck in' isn't a surprise but it's not a good look.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Can't women just fuck recreationally? Honest question and I guess it’s from your experiences especially combined with the strange “giving up the goods” comment. But do you honestly believe women can’t have sex for fun ? It’s covered by the 70’s racey song lyrics below although girls is probably better replaced with women in 2023 “Some girls will, some girls won't Some girls need a lot of lovin' and some girls don't” Find the right woman, treat her well (not money related) and she’ll want as much fun sex as you or more. If she thinks you only want her “goods” and not the whole of her you’ll be lucky to get laid at all !! Only my thoughts and I’m probably wrong " Keep it in the forum | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some of the most naive things I have seen written in a long time. Over the years (out of relationships) we have both had many one night stands, no emotional connections needed or given. Just the need to have that release. Here is a really simple thought that many men need to have drummed into their head. “Not everyone wants to have sex with you.” And perhaps if you spoke to people like it was the last thing on your mind rather than the first, if you stopped looking at women like a challenge, and maybe viewed them as your equal. You may have much more fun along the way. Oh how ironic!!!!! Explain ?" The couples here have a different perspective...and I'm going blue in the face repeating it. the women already have the emotional connection with the old man indoors, so their input doesn't apply. so when they talk about no emotion, they don't. whereas single women do, no matter how much they deny it...they do. as for the irony.....well. you haven't read enough of the thread...re stung! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask because I got stung. I was happy to do something without a connection. someone was nurturing something in me for their own gratification. I was being given the impression it was something more whereas in fact the person was just an emotional vampire. Hence, it appears at first glance, most of the single women require some sort of validating of themselves first before they give our the goods! Give up the goods? Is that really how you see it? Well, since women are the gatekeepers to sex, yeah. The that's the point of the entire thread! Explain how women are the 'gatekeepers' to sex, from your own perspective. Please. If they weren't gatekeepers then a criminal act would have taken place. in summary - consent! simple enough? Perhaps more simple than you need to be. You haven't answered my question at all. You have made a statement which implies something else entirely. Why do you call women the gatekeepers of sex ? I don't a psychologist did. I just agreed with their analysis in the context and when it comes to sex....women don't give it out unless there's something in it for them and in the case of single women (couples here don't apply for the umpteenth time) it's usually the prelude to a relationship for which men are the gatekeepers of. that'll be the men being all emotional the women here seem to observe bit! Did you really just say women won't give it out unless there is something in it for them? Do you not realise how that sounds? What you have just said is - women won't have sex unless they actually want to and will get some enjoyment out of it. How very dare these women not just spread their legs and lie back to be used! How rude. How dare they gatekeep their own bodies! Honestly, it is truly awful how women have the right not to fuck everyone who wants to stick their penis in them. Almost like they think they are special huh? MrsAbz TAKEN COMPLETELY OUT OF CONTEXT!!! NO SENSE OF ENTITLEMENT IMPLIED OR INFERRED. The context of the psychologist was in entering relationships....not an entitlement to sex.....but twist it as you like to vilify me!" Oh no! You shouted so you are definately right and I beg your forgiveness Or, you want to vilify women because you want them to service you and they aren't. As has been stated repeatedly. Women can and do have sex withoit emotional attachment but it tends to be with people they find attractive and not just anyone who wants to fuck them. Hardly a difficult concept to follow. MrsAbz | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask because I got stung. I was happy to do something without a connection. someone was nurturing something in me for their own gratification. I was being given the impression it was something more whereas in fact the person was just an emotional vampire. Hence, it appears at first glance, most of the single women require some sort of validating of themselves first before they give our the goods! Give up the goods? Is that really how you see it? Well, since women are the gatekeepers to sex, yeah. The that's the point of the entire thread! Explain how women are the 'gatekeepers' to sex, from your own perspective. Please. If they weren't gatekeepers then a criminal act would have taken place. in summary - consent! simple enough? Perhaps more simple than you need to be. You haven't answered my question at all. You have made a statement which implies something else entirely. Why do you call women the gatekeepers of sex ? I don't a psychologist did. I just agreed with their analysis in the context and when it comes to sex....women don't give it out unless there's something in it for them and in the case of single women (couples here don't apply for the umpteenth time) it's usually the prelude to a relationship for which men are the gatekeepers of. that'll be the men being all emotional the women here seem to observe bit! Thanks - What's her name ? This psychologist ? Sigourney Weaver Behave ! It was David Buss chiefly, if my memory serves me well and it mostly does. It has been developed since then , many times but his work should be read in context cos he didn't mean it to be as literal as is being made out. Sorry granny my natural response is humour. Had a wee read and you are 100%. So can we all agree that Fab needs a photo verification, a psych evaluation and an emotional stability Check now before joining. Some scary reading on this thread, makes you ponder a few things…." Well ...... yes..... I didn't take you seriously and in fact her name lends itself to that profession ........ AND .... Thank God for those with humour I say .... some on here and too big of a some are clearly up for carrying out a lynching | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some of the most naive things I have seen written in a long time. Over the years (out of relationships) we have both had many one night stands, no emotional connections needed or given. Just the need to have that release. Here is a really simple thought that many men need to have drummed into their head. “Not everyone wants to have sex with you.” And perhaps if you spoke to people like it was the last thing on your mind rather than the first, if you stopped looking at women like a challenge, and maybe viewed them as your equal. You may have much more fun along the way. Oh how ironic!!!!! Explain ? The couples here have a different perspective...and I'm going blue in the face repeating it. the women already have the emotional connection with the old man indoors, so their input doesn't apply. so when they talk about no emotion, they don't. whereas single women do, no matter how much they deny it...they do. as for the irony.....well. you haven't read enough of the thread...re stung!" Mansplain all you want. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"... Here is a really simple thought that many men need to have drummed into their head. “Not everyone wants to have sex with you.” And perhaps if you spoke to people like it was the last thing on your mind rather than the first, if you stopped looking at women like a challenge, and maybe viewed them as your equal. You may have much more fun along the way. ..." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some of the most naive things I have seen written in a long time. Over the years (out of relationships) we have both had many one night stands, no emotional connections needed or given. Just the need to have that release. Here is a really simple thought that many men need to have drummed into their head. “Not everyone wants to have sex with you.” And perhaps if you spoke to people like it was the last thing on your mind rather than the first, if you stopped looking at women like a challenge, and maybe viewed them as your equal. You may have much more fun along the way. Oh how ironic!!!!! Explain ? The couples here have a different perspective...and I'm going blue in the face repeating it. the women already have the emotional connection with the old man indoors, so their input doesn't apply. so when they talk about no emotion, they don't. whereas single women do, no matter how much they deny it...they do. as for the irony.....well. you haven't read enough of the thread...re stung!" Think we’re going blue in the face explaining this to you If no women (in your experience) are fucking your without an emotional connect And I hate to be so blunt here It’s because what you have to offer isn’t enough for them to just fuck you. That’s all it is. You don’t have what it takes to experience a woman just wanting to fuck you because your hot. But it’s easier to say it doesn’t happen then admit it just doesn’t happen to you | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What makes you think that OP? Personally speaking I need attraction, chemistry and a guy who behaves respectfully...not to be confused with an emotional connection. I can fuck for fun till the cows come home as long as I have the above....without falling for my sex toy Mrs M" Great answer | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Can't women just fuck recreationally?" yes they can, and they do. And they do it very well | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What makes you think that OP? Personally speaking I need attraction, chemistry and a guy who behaves respectfully...not to be confused with an emotional connection. I can fuck for fun till the cows come home as long as I have the above....without falling for my sex toy Mrs M Great answer " Tits. You meant Tits Sam | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some of the most naive things I have seen written in a long time. Over the years (out of relationships) we have both had many one night stands, no emotional connections needed or given. Just the need to have that release. Here is a really simple thought that many men need to have drummed into their head. “Not everyone wants to have sex with you.” And perhaps if you spoke to people like it was the last thing on your mind rather than the first, if you stopped looking at women like a challenge, and maybe viewed them as your equal. You may have much more fun along the way. Oh how ironic!!!!! Explain ? The couples here have a different perspective...and I'm going blue in the face repeating it. the women already have the emotional connection with the old man indoors, so their input doesn't apply. so when they talk about no emotion, they don't. whereas single women do, no matter how much they deny it...they do. as for the irony.....well. you haven't read enough of the thread...re stung!" We were talking from memories as single guy and a single lady (we have only been together for just over a year so not that long ago). Neither of us had an issue having sex without an emotional connection. The advice given applied to single guys talking to single women. But your continued responses to us and others show that you have absolutely zero interest in having your view changed, or any small in your own perceptions. So you have two choices, carry on with those views and continue to be disappointed. Or listen to advice you are being given with. Little bit of humility and give yourself a chance of a different outcome. Up to you….but we are out of this thread. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask because I got stung. I was happy to do something without a connection. someone was nurturing something in me for their own gratification. I was being given the impression it was something more whereas in fact the person was just an emotional vampire. Hence, it appears at first glance, most of the single women require some sort of validating of themselves first before they give our the goods! Give up the goods? Is that really how you see it? Well, since women are the gatekeepers to sex, yeah. The that's the point of the entire thread! Explain how women are the 'gatekeepers' to sex, from your own perspective. Please. If they weren't gatekeepers then a criminal act would have taken place. in summary - consent! simple enough? Perhaps more simple than you need to be. You haven't answered my question at all. You have made a statement which implies something else entirely. Why do you call women the gatekeepers of sex ? I don't a psychologist did. I just agreed with their analysis in the context and when it comes to sex....women don't give it out unless there's something in it for them and in the case of single women (couples here don't apply for the umpteenth time) it's usually the prelude to a relationship for which men are the gatekeepers of. that'll be the men being all emotional the women here seem to observe bit! Thanks - What's her name ? This psychologist ? Sigourney Weaver Behave ! It was David Buss chiefly, if my memory serves me well and it mostly does. It has been developed since then , many times but his work should be read in context cos he didn't mean it to be as literal as is being made out. Sorry granny my natural response is humour. Had a wee read and you are 100%. So can we all agree that Fab needs a photo verification, a psych evaluation and an emotional stability Check now before joining. Some scary reading on this thread, makes you ponder a few things…. Well ...... yes..... I didn't take you seriously and in fact her name lends itself to that profession ........ AND .... Thank God for those with humour I say .... some on here and too big of a some are clearly up for carrying out a lynching " She is the gatekeeper of all gatekeeper and if I may be so bold, the first women to make me question my sexuality the first time I watched that scene! Think this may be a case of a lonely man, now knowing how to communicate correctly and possibly should be looking for friendship on another platform than Fab (ie proper dating sites) to save future hurt, resentment and misunderstanding of the amazing feminine energy of Fab. Don’t mean to belittle OP but the women here truly do know what we want or we wouldn’t be here. Such resentment isn’t good for anyone’s mental health | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask because I got stung. I was happy to do something without a connection. someone was nurturing something in me for their own gratification. I was being given the impression it was something more whereas in fact the person was just an emotional vampire. Hence, it appears at first glance, most of the single women require some sort of validating of themselves first before they give our the goods! Give up the goods? Is that really how you see it? Well, since women are the gatekeepers to sex, yeah. The that's the point of the entire thread! Explain how women are the 'gatekeepers' to sex, from your own perspective. Please. If they weren't gatekeepers then a criminal act would have taken place. in summary - consent! simple enough? Perhaps more simple than you need to be. You haven't answered my question at all. You have made a statement which implies something else entirely. Why do you call women the gatekeepers of sex ? I don't a psychologist did. I just agreed with their analysis in the context and when it comes to sex....women don't give it out unless there's something in it for them and in the case of single women (couples here don't apply for the umpteenth time) it's usually the prelude to a relationship for which men are the gatekeepers of. that'll be the men being all emotional the women here seem to observe bit!" Like all science, little is fixed. When the evidence charges, so do the theories. You have perhaps latched on to a psychologist who has since developed vastly different approaches and understandings of people. You seem remarkably fixed in your outlook. I can understand that if you've emerged from a painful experience that you're likely aiming to make sense of things and to recover. What we can aim to do is to better understand ourselves and what we need, so that we can find the right people to associate with. There's plenty of diversity here, as the thread shows | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
back to top |