Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Endgame printed in Holland, which is a country where people were clogs and live tulips, names two high level royal racists. The author claims that it was a translation error. How can this be if they weren’t names in the books printed in English? Is this just a publicity stunt to sell more books, at the royals expense? It’s all over the news. “Credit to EssexTom for this post style”" Who asked the question? That’s what we want to know. “2 high level royal racisits”. I wonder who the other one is  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Mischief making for the purpose of maintaining a public presence. (Not the OP’s post, the subject matter) "I knew that…
I tend to agree, they need more publicity for the book. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I read online that it was Charles who was named. To be fair I don't like Omid. He has a chip on his shoulder. " Probably best not to name names. The blokes in black sunglasses might be round to cart you away! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
(Crown) (goldsilverandpearls) (medalsinthepost) | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I read online that it was Charles who was named. To be fair I don't like Omid. He has a chip on his shoulder. Probably best not to name names. The blokes in black sunglasses might be round to cart you away! " I doubt it very much.   | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't believe it's a publicity stunt.
(Crown) (goldsilverandpearls) (medalsinthepost)"Do you think that naming them was an actual accident in the Dutch version of the book? I’m not sure to be honest. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't believe it's a publicity stunt.
(Crown) (goldsilverandpearls) (medalsinthepost)
Do you think that naming them was an actual accident in the Dutch version of the book?
I’m not sure to be honest."It would seem unlikely that it’s an accident. I’m sure it’s intentional for a bit of additional exposure for the book. I think whether it’s racist or not depends on context and what the actual question was? It’s irrelevant what the skin colour is but I do see how it would be a change for Royal watchers to see some diversity in the royal family. Sad really. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't believe it's a publicity stunt.
(Crown) (goldsilverandpearls) (medalsinthepost)
Do you think that naming them was an actual accident in the Dutch version of the book?
I’m not sure to be honest.
It would seem unlikely that it’s an accident. I’m sure it’s intentional for a bit of additional exposure for the book.
I think whether it’s racist or not depends on context and what the actual question was? It’s irrelevant what the skin colour is but I do see how it would be a change for Royal watchers to see some diversity in the royal family. Sad really."yes the German family who married a Greek needs to be less British | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Probably a ploy to get more attention for the sales of the book, which has clearly worked as it was all over the news the morning. " No such yhing as bad publicity. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Who was named and to be fair I am mixed race, being asked what part of what parent will a child inherit is only racist if your an idiot. It's like saying do you think he will have your eyes or hers. The queen married a Greek remember when back in the day that was about as common as marrying an alien. You can make anything about race if you want to. But allowing one race of people to say one thing and not allowing another race to say the same thing is a form of verbal apartheid. If one race can say something then the other race should be able to otherwise if literally is the verbal definition of one rule for one race another for another. So if you have a ginger and someone with dark hair is it not ok to say do you think the baby will have your freckles? But not do you think the child may have some of your complexion?"  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't believe it's a publicity stunt.
(Crown) (goldsilverandpearls) (medalsinthepost)
Do you think that naming them was an actual accident in the Dutch version of the book?
I’m not sure to be honest."I think it's a very clever publicity stunt. Or they have terrible translation teams. I'd assume a name is the same in any language. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Apparently, Piers Morgan has named the two as Cathrine & King Charles. " I bet you they asked what kind of skin type the baby will have. It's a pretty standard thing to ask of any two people who come together share DNA and then produce a baby. Oh he has your nose, oh he has his dad's eyes. So your telling me it's now racist to say oh do you think he will have some of your complexion if the person you'd saying it to is mixed race? Again it's insane, everyone does this, genetics are shared and it's typical to ask which features do you think the baby will have. Charles is probably hopeful Harry's gingerness is removed as we know there are no gingers in the royal bloodline so harry, genetically should not be ginger if he comes from the DNA of his father and the DNA of his mother. So rather than being horrified of having a baby that's no ginger like his dad they probably want them not to be. Why is Harry ginger by the way? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Apparently, Piers Morgan has named the two as Cathrine & King Charles. I bet you they asked what kind of skin type the baby will have. It's a pretty standard thing to ask of any two people who come together share DNA and then produce a baby. Oh he has your nose, oh he has his dad's eyes. So your telling me it's now racist to say oh do you think he will have some of your complexion if the person you'd saying it to is mixed race? Again it's insane, everyone does this, genetics are shared and it's typical to ask which features do you think the baby will have. Charles is probably hopeful Harry's gingerness is removed as we know there are no gingers in the royal bloodline so harry, genetically should not be ginger if he comes from the DNA of his father and the DNA of his mother. So rather than being horrified of having a baby that's no ginger like his dad they probably want them not to be. Why is Harry ginger by the way?" Because his mother was blonde, why do you ask? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Apparently, Piers Morgan has named the two as Cathrine & King Charles. I bet you they asked what kind of skin type the baby will have. It's a pretty standard thing to ask of any two people who come together share DNA and then produce a baby. Oh he has your nose, oh he has his dad's eyes. So your telling me it's now racist to say oh do you think he will have some of your complexion if the person you'd saying it to is mixed race? Again it's insane, everyone does this, genetics are shared and it's typical to ask which features do you think the baby will have. Charles is probably hopeful Harry's gingerness is removed as we know there are no gingers in the royal bloodline so harry, genetically should not be ginger if he comes from the DNA of his father and the DNA of his mother. So rather than being horrified of having a baby that's no ginger like his dad they probably want them not to be. Why is Harry ginger by the way?" I think someone doesn't understand the genetics of recessive genes. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Apparently, Piers Morgan has named the two as Cathrine & King Charles. I bet you they asked what kind of skin type the baby will have. It's a pretty standard thing to ask of any two people who come together share DNA and then produce a baby. Oh he has your nose, oh he has his dad's eyes. So your telling me it's now racist to say oh do you think he will have some of your complexion if the person you'd saying it to is mixed race? Again it's insane, everyone does this, genetics are shared and it's typical to ask which features do you think the baby will have. Charles is probably hopeful Harry's gingerness is removed as we know there are no gingers in the royal bloodline so harry, genetically should not be ginger if he comes from the DNA of his father and the DNA of his mother. So rather than being horrified of having a baby that's no ginger like his dad they probably want them not to be. Why is Harry ginger by the way? I think someone doesn't understand the genetics of recessive genes. " It's almost as if people *still* believe the KC3 isn't Harry's father | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Apparently, Piers Morgan has named the two as Cathrine & King Charles. I bet you they asked what kind of skin type the baby will have. It's a pretty standard thing to ask of any two people who come together share DNA and then produce a baby. Oh he has your nose, oh he has his dad's eyes. So your telling me it's now racist to say oh do you think he will have some of your complexion if the person you'd saying it to is mixed race? Again it's insane, everyone does this, genetics are shared and it's typical to ask which features do you think the baby will have. Charles is probably hopeful Harry's gingerness is removed as we know there are no gingers in the royal bloodline so harry, genetically should not be ginger if he comes from the DNA of his father and the DNA of his mother. So rather than being horrified of having a baby that's no ginger like his dad they probably want them not to be. Why is Harry ginger by the way? Because his mother was blonde, why do you ask?" I remember some guy friend of Diana saying he was a chip off the old block. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Apparently, Piers Morgan has named the two as Cathrine & King Charles. I bet you they asked what kind of skin type the baby will have. It's a pretty standard thing to ask of any two people who come together share DNA and then produce a baby. Oh he has your nose, oh he has his dad's eyes. So your telling me it's now racist to say oh do you think he will have some of your complexion if the person you'd saying it to is mixed race? Again it's insane, everyone does this, genetics are shared and it's typical to ask which features do you think the baby will have. Charles is probably hopeful Harry's gingerness is removed as we know there are no gingers in the royal bloodline so harry, genetically should not be ginger if he comes from the DNA of his father and the DNA of his mother. So rather than being horrified of having a baby that's no ginger like his dad they probably want them not to be. Why is Harry ginger by the way? I think someone doesn't understand the genetics of recessive genes. " recessive genes yes, but we are not like cats. There are traits and there are complete throw backs, with receive genes you tend to get a very low version like a sprinkling of ginger in a beard. Just because you have a long ago African relative means that it would be almost impossible for two very white looking people to suddenly have a black baby. Harry's gingerness is not recessive and if it is it's a one in a trillion type of situation. It's more like one of the partners was full on ginger. How many centuries ago did the royals last have a ginger in the family ? Harry is full on ginger like natural born ging, no sprinkling in the beard and a few more freckles, he is like Bonnie Scotsman porridge selling, ron weasly ging | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Apparently, Piers Morgan has named the two as Cathrine & King Charles. I bet you they asked what kind of skin type the baby will have. It's a pretty standard thing to ask of any two people who come together share DNA and then produce a baby. Oh he has your nose, oh he has his dad's eyes. So your telling me it's now racist to say oh do you think he will have some of your complexion if the person you'd saying it to is mixed race? Again it's insane, everyone does this, genetics are shared and it's typical to ask which features do you think the baby will have. Charles is probably hopeful Harry's gingerness is removed as we know there are no gingers in the royal bloodline so harry, genetically should not be ginger if he comes from the DNA of his father and the DNA of his mother. So rather than being horrified of having a baby that's no ginger like his dad they probably want them not to be. Why is Harry ginger by the way? I think someone doesn't understand the genetics of recessive genes. recessive genes yes, but we are not like cats. There are traits and there are complete throw backs, with receive genes you tend to get a very low version like a sprinkling of ginger in a beard. Just because you have a long ago African relative means that it would be almost impossible for two very white looking people to suddenly have a black baby. Harry's gingerness is not recessive and if it is it's a one in a trillion type of situation. It's more like one of the partners was full on ginger. How many centuries ago did the royals last have a ginger in the family ? Harry is full on ginger like natural born ging, no sprinkling in the beard and a few more freckles, he is like Bonnie Scotsman porridge selling, ron weasly ging" I’m not sure you like ginger haired people? Or is it just Harry? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Endgame printed in Holland, which is a country where people were clogs and live tulips, names two high level royal racists. The author claims that it was a translation error. How can this be if they weren’t names in the books printed in English? Is this just a publicity stunt to sell more books, at the royals expense? It’s all over the news. “Credit to EssexTom for this post style”" Bless you my child... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Probably a ploy to get more attention for the sales of the book, which has clearly worked as it was all over the news the morning. " All over the news did you say ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Apparently, Piers Morgan has named the two as Cathrine & King Charles. I bet you they asked what kind of skin type the baby will have. It's a pretty standard thing to ask of any two people who come together share DNA and then produce a baby. Oh he has your nose, oh he has his dad's eyes. So your telling me it's now racist to say oh do you think he will have some of your complexion if the person you'd saying it to is mixed race? Again it's insane, everyone does this, genetics are shared and it's typical to ask which features do you think the baby will have. Charles is probably hopeful Harry's gingerness is removed as we know there are no gingers in the royal bloodline so harry, genetically should not be ginger if he comes from the DNA of his father and the DNA of his mother. So rather than being horrified of having a baby that's no ginger like his dad they probably want them not to be. Why is Harry ginger by the way? I think someone doesn't understand the genetics of recessive genes. recessive genes yes, but we are not like cats. There are traits and there are complete throw backs, with receive genes you tend to get a very low version like a sprinkling of ginger in a beard. Just because you have a long ago African relative means that it would be almost impossible for two very white looking people to suddenly have a black baby. Harry's gingerness is not recessive and if it is it's a one in a trillion type of situation. It's more like one of the partners was full on ginger. How many centuries ago did the royals last have a ginger in the family ? Harry is full on ginger like natural born ging, no sprinkling in the beard and a few more freckles, he is like Bonnie Scotsman porridge selling, ron weasly ging" If that's what you want to believe I'm not going to convince you otherwise. From the only ginger and blue eyed person in my family and have several bits of paper that say I have a good knowledge of genetics  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Apparently, Piers Morgan has named the two as Cathrine & King Charles. I bet you they asked what kind of skin type the baby will have. It's a pretty standard thing to ask of any two people who come together share DNA and then produce a baby. Oh he has your nose, oh he has his dad's eyes. So your telling me it's now racist to say oh do you think he will have some of your complexion if the person you'd saying it to is mixed race? Again it's insane, everyone does this, genetics are shared and it's typical to ask which features do you think the baby will have. Charles is probably hopeful Harry's gingerness is removed as we know there are no gingers in the royal bloodline so harry, genetically should not be ginger if he comes from the DNA of his father and the DNA of his mother. So rather than being horrified of having a baby that's no ginger like his dad they probably want them not to be. Why is Harry ginger by the way? I think someone doesn't understand the genetics of recessive genes. recessive genes yes, but we are not like cats. There are traits and there are complete throw backs, with receive genes you tend to get a very low version like a sprinkling of ginger in a beard. Just because you have a long ago African relative means that it would be almost impossible for two very white looking people to suddenly have a black baby. Harry's gingerness is not recessive and if it is it's a one in a trillion type of situation. It's more like one of the partners was full on ginger. How many centuries ago did the royals last have a ginger in the family ? Harry is full on ginger like natural born ging, no sprinkling in the beard and a few more freckles, he is like Bonnie Scotsman porridge selling, ron weasly ging" It's a little-known fact that all three of Princess Diana's siblings — Lady Jane Fellowes, Lady Sarah McCorquodale and Charles, 9th Earl Spencer — have naturally red hair. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It seems like Harry has abandoned his family and Megan has abandoned hers. Rough justice will be when their own children abandon them.... " Maybe, it seems that Ms Markle will do anything to get her name in the media, even if it’s picking fights with her children’s grand parents or family. Mr Scobie obviously got the info from her. He is just her mouthpiece after all. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Apparently, Piers Morgan has named the two as Cathrine & King Charles. I bet you they asked what kind of skin type the baby will have. It's a pretty standard thing to ask of any two people who come together share DNA and then produce a baby. Oh he has your nose, oh he has his dad's eyes. So your telling me it's now racist to say oh do you think he will have some of your complexion if the person you'd saying it to is mixed race? Again it's insane, everyone does this, genetics are shared and it's typical to ask which features do you think the baby will have. Charles is probably hopeful Harry's gingerness is removed as we know there are no gingers in the royal bloodline so harry, genetically should not be ginger if he comes from the DNA of his father and the DNA of his mother. So rather than being horrified of having a baby that's no ginger like his dad they probably want them not to be. Why is Harry ginger by the way? I think someone doesn't understand the genetics of recessive genes. recessive genes yes, but we are not like cats. There are traits and there are complete throw backs, with receive genes you tend to get a very low version like a sprinkling of ginger in a beard. Just because you have a long ago African relative means that it would be almost impossible for two very white looking people to suddenly have a black baby. Harry's gingerness is not recessive and if it is it's a one in a trillion type of situation. It's more like one of the partners was full on ginger. How many centuries ago did the royals last have a ginger in the family ? Harry is full on ginger like natural born ging, no sprinkling in the beard and a few more freckles, he is like Bonnie Scotsman porridge selling, ron weasly ging It's a little-known fact that all three of Princess Diana's siblings — Lady Jane Fellowes, Lady Sarah McCorquodale and Charles, 9th Earl Spencer — have naturally red hair." I am not really that bought into the who's the daddy. I am more stating that asking if you think the child may be able to tan due to having a higher level of melanin in the gene pool in my opinion is normal pre baby questions as are what hair colour do you think it will have. It's hardly like she found a kkk membership card with a picture of Charles as a white knight doing a lynching. If you block cross race families from having normal conversations for fear of causing offense is more likely to breed racism and than being able to discuss the normal fusion of genese without someone bringing up the race card to get clicks on a pathetic life story of a over paid over privileged "victim". Man the hell up. Bringing the race card up to often lowers the power of people who genuinly are affected by true racism. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Apparently, Piers Morgan has named the two as Cathrine & King Charles. I bet you they asked what kind of skin type the baby will have. It's a pretty standard thing to ask of any two people who come together share DNA and then produce a baby. Oh he has your nose, oh he has his dad's eyes. So your telling me it's now racist to say oh do you think he will have some of your complexion if the person you'd saying it to is mixed race? Again it's insane, everyone does this, genetics are shared and it's typical to ask which features do you think the baby will have. Charles is probably hopeful Harry's gingerness is removed as we know there are no gingers in the royal bloodline so harry, genetically should not be ginger if he comes from the DNA of his father and the DNA of his mother. So rather than being horrified of having a baby that's no ginger like his dad they probably want them not to be. Why is Harry ginger by the way?" This although the Spencers - Diana's family do have red hair running through the family. Her sister that dated Charles before was ginger. They then broke up and diana sadly married him. So there is ginger in the Spencer bloodline. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Endgame printed in Holland, which is a country where people were clogs and live tulips, names two high level royal racists. The author claims that it was a translation error. How can this be if they weren’t names in the books printed in English? Is this just a publicity stunt to sell more books, at the royals expense? It’s all over the news. “Credit to EssexTom for this post style” Who asked the question? That’s what we want to know. “2 high level royal racisits”. I wonder who the other one is "Kate apparently | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"'Racism' is word which needs to be retired from the English language unless it becomes acknowledged that white people can and do indeed suffer from it too, as we have seen relentlessly for years now."
Have a look at some of the groups on Kik,#white people are trash,#white genocide and many many more. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does anyone actually care a flying monkeys if the Royals are racist? " The way I see it, discriminating against people because they're of a particular race, is no worse than giving certain demographics a green light to act like twats because of their race. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"'Racism' is word which needs to be retired from the English language unless it becomes acknowledged that white people can and do indeed suffer from it too, as we have seen relentlessly for years now." You really have no clue…. I am so tempted to say come back when you have endured about 300 years of the stuff and then we can have a proper conversation about “racism”… | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"'Racism' is word which needs to be retired from the English language unless it becomes acknowledged that white people can and do indeed suffer from it too, as we have seen relentlessly for years now. You really have no clue…. I am so tempted to say come back when you have endured about 300 years of the stuff and then we can have a proper conversation about “racism”… " Surely you aren’t suggesting that white people can’t suffer from racism because black people have suffered from it for longer? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"'Racism' is word which needs to be retired from the English language unless it becomes acknowledged that white people can and do indeed suffer from it too, as we have seen relentlessly for years now. You really have no clue…. I am so tempted to say come back when you have endured about 300 years of the stuff and then we can have a proper conversation about “racism”… " Unless you're 300 years old, neither do you fella | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"'Racism' is word which needs to be retired from the English language unless it becomes acknowledged that white people can and do indeed suffer from it too, as we have seen relentlessly for years now. You really have no clue…. I am so tempted to say come back when you have endured about 300 years of the stuff and then we can have a proper conversation about “racism”… " I find this quite interesting, you know although it's not perfect Britain did not have segregation, Jim crow etc. we also didn't have legal slavlcery for many many years. It seems a lot of what the USA did has been accepted that all other countriss did the same. America was horrendous. Britain is no saint but don't taint us with the same brush as the USA. I am mixed race I get on with life. Build your own life I don't define my life by the past. If you want to fight issues look at the amount of problems going on today with the treatment of people | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyone read the Dutch version and actually seen the names in print? You would have thought that there would at least be a picture of the page where the offence is said to have been printed. And in these days of "likes" needed by people with a rampant, insatiable appetite for attention I'm surprised the proof isn't all over social media. Likely this is just a publicity stunt to sell more books at Xmas." Didn't the first book get launched in South Africa early and there was a press scrap to get the info out early. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"'Racism' is word which needs to be retired from the English language unless it becomes acknowledged that white people can and do indeed suffer from it too, as we have seen relentlessly for years now. You really have no clue…. I am so tempted to say come back when you have endured about 300 years of the stuff and then we can have a proper conversation about “racism”… I find this quite interesting, you know although it's not perfect Britain did not have segregation, Jim crow etc. we also didn't have legal slavlcery for many many years. It seems a lot of what the USA did has been accepted that all other countriss did the same. America was horrendous. Britain is no saint but don't taint us with the same brush as the USA. I am mixed race I get on with life. Build your own life I don't define my life by the past. If you want to fight issues look at the amount of problems going on today with the treatment of people " I don’t even need to go back as far as that I am betting that most children of windrush generation parents will have heard “you have to work twice as hard to get ahead “ in some shape or form…. I wish I didn’t have to say that to my niece.. but Even now I think a lot of 2nd generation windrush people are still having that chat….. Don’t pat yourself on the back because the uk doesn’t have as much of a problem as the us! …. It still exists! Pat yourself on the back when the problems around racism don’t exist anymore… if you are saying we are there I would say talk to black people and ask them! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"'Racism' is word which needs to be retired from the English language unless it becomes acknowledged that white people can and do indeed suffer from it too, as we have seen relentlessly for years now. You really have no clue…. I am so tempted to say come back when you have endured about 300 years of the stuff and then we can have a proper conversation about “racism”… I find this quite interesting, you know although it's not perfect Britain did not have segregation, Jim crow etc. we also didn't have legal slavlcery for many many years. It seems a lot of what the USA did has been accepted that all other countriss did the same. America was horrendous. Britain is no saint but don't taint us with the same brush as the USA. I am mixed race I get on with life. Build your own life I don't define my life by the past. If you want to fight issues look at the amount of problems going on today with the treatment of people I don’t even need to go back as far as that I am betting that most children of windrush generation parents will have heard “you have to work twice as hard to get ahead “ in some shape or form…. I wish I didn’t have to say that to my niece.. but Even now I think a lot of 2nd generation windrush people are still having that chat….. Don’t pat yourself on the back because the uk doesn’t have as much of a problem as the us! …. It still exists! Pat yourself on the back when the problems around racism don’t exist anymore… if you are saying we are there I would say talk to black people and ask them! " look, take race out of it, the difference between the white working class and the rich the people with disabilities and the normals, catholics and Protestants,Irish vs English the list could go on. Race is one issue but anyone with an ability to have compassion and not an obsessive view in themselves (or their colour) can see a whole host of horrible history and it was pretty colour blind. If your so horrified by what went on take a look at Africa today and try and help there as worse things are happening today their that need attention that would help the world more effectively thank complaining about the past. Be the change don't be the grudge | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"'Racism' is word which needs to be retired from the English language unless it becomes acknowledged that white people can and do indeed suffer from it too, as we have seen relentlessly for years now. You really have no clue…. I am so tempted to say come back when you have endured about 300 years of the stuff and then we can have a proper conversation about “racism”… I find this quite interesting, you know although it's not perfect Britain did not have segregation, Jim crow etc. we also didn't have legal slavlcery for many many years. It seems a lot of what the USA did has been accepted that all other countriss did the same. America was horrendous. Britain is no saint but don't taint us with the same brush as the USA. I am mixed race I get on with life. Build your own life I don't define my life by the past. If you want to fight issues look at the amount of problems going on today with the treatment of people I don’t even need to go back as far as that I am betting that most children of windrush generation parents will have heard “you have to work twice as hard to get ahead “ in some shape or form…. I wish I didn’t have to say that to my niece.. but Even now I think a lot of 2nd generation windrush people are still having that chat….. Don’t pat yourself on the back because the uk doesn’t have as much of a problem as the us! …. It still exists! Pat yourself on the back when the problems around racism don’t exist anymore… if you are saying we are there I would say talk to black people and ask them! " also are you saying the racism only applies to black people? Amazing | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"'Racism' is word which needs to be retired from the English language unless it becomes acknowledged that white people can and do indeed suffer from it too, as we have seen relentlessly for years now. You really have no clue…. I am so tempted to say come back when you have endured about 300 years of the stuff and then we can have a proper conversation about “racism”… I find this quite interesting, you know although it's not perfect Britain did not have segregation, Jim crow etc. we also didn't have legal slavlcery for many many years. It seems a lot of what the USA did has been accepted that all other countriss did the same. America was horrendous. Britain is no saint but don't taint us with the same brush as the USA. I am mixed race I get on with life. Build your own life I don't define my life by the past. If you want to fight issues look at the amount of problems going on today with the treatment of people I don’t even need to go back as far as that I am betting that most children of windrush generation parents will have heard “you have to work twice as hard to get ahead “ in some shape or form…. I wish I didn’t have to say that to my niece.. but Even now I think a lot of 2nd generation windrush people are still having that chat….. Don’t pat yourself on the back because the uk doesn’t have as much of a problem as the us! …. It still exists! Pat yourself on the back when the problems around racism don’t exist anymore… if you are saying we are there I would say talk to black people and ask them! " White people are less than 10% of the global population, if racism is such a problem for you you're welcome to go live somewhere we aren't, no ones stopping you. Cheers. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Charles was wearing a tie covered in Greek flags at the climate conference. Some are saying it's a tribute to his father who was actually from Greece or a subtle show of support for the return of Elgin's Marbles. It may of been a tie that once belonged to his father. We may never know. " ...Or he likes the colours. The Queen used to wear colours to allegedly show support for some causes. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How can you mistranslate and come up with two names if they aren't supposedly in the original? Sounds totally fabricated" Haven't seen any pics of it in print on an actual page. But the media never tells lies so I believe it's true. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Although King Charles & Princess Catherine have been named my money would have been on Prince Philip as that’s the sort of thing he would have come out with going by some of the comments he made in the past." My money is on Meghan and Harry trying to get themselves in the limelight as victims again, as everybody knows, Omid Scobie’s information has come directly from Megan. All part of her narcissistic control of Harry by alienating him from his family. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Although King Charles & Princess Catherine have been named my money would have been on Prince Philip as that’s the sort of thing he would have come out with going by some of the comments he made in the past. My money is on Meghan and Harry trying to get themselves in the limelight as victims again, as everybody knows, Omid Scobie’s information has come directly from Megan. All part of her narcissistic control of Harry by alienating him from his family." She saved him from a stuffy institution that he hated and from a country who hates whoever the media tell them to.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" indeed Philip the most British of all our monarchs. To be fair let's me clear someone asked if part of one person's DNA will be past onto their offspring. Is this racism ?" It can be. Depends on intent. "Will the baby be black?"
Or
"Will the baby be black?"  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" indeed Philip the most British of all our monarchs. To be fair let's me clear someone asked if part of one person's DNA will be past onto their offspring. Is this racism ? It can be. Depends on intent. "Will the baby be black?"
Or
"Will the baby be black?" "will the baby be ginger? Will the baby be blond also what if a black person said would the baby be black if you say that's not racist. Then you are creating one rule for one race and one for another which is the definition of apartheid | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" White people are less than 10% of the global population, if racism is such a problem for you you're welcome to go live somewhere we aren't, no ones stopping you. Cheers." The absolute classic line…… Thank you for proving my point……. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" White people are less than 10% of the global population, if racism is such a problem for you you're welcome to go live somewhere we aren't, no ones stopping you. Cheers. The absolute classic line…… Thank you for proving my point……. " Indeed it is a classic line, one which I've yet to see any kind of decent rebuttal to. You highlighted a problem, I proposed a solution. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Although King Charles & Princess Catherine have been named my money would have been on Prince Philip as that’s the sort of thing he would have come out with going by some of the comments he made in the past. My money is on Meghan and Harry trying to get themselves in the limelight as victims again, as everybody knows, Omid Scobie’s information has come directly from Megan. All part of her narcissistic control of Harry by alienating him from his family. She saved him from a stuffy institution that he hated and from a country who hates whoever the media tell them to. "Saved him? From his position of wealth, comfort and privelage? To what exactly? To their failed business enterprises ? Netflix - fail. Spotify - fail - ceo Bill Simmons described them as “lazy fucking grifters” after they took the money but didn’t create the content. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" White people are less than 10% of the global population, if racism is such a problem for you you're welcome to go live somewhere we aren't, no ones stopping you. Cheers. The absolute classic line…… Thank you for proving my point……. " genuinly do you think that racism is worse than any other form of inequality, and do you think there is not any black on white racism? What is the make up of the government in South Africa for example is there a far representation of each race of the country today? What's the treatment of different people in Africa say someone from Nigeria in botswana? Maybe look and fight inequality than become a victim. History is history let's just say there are fights you could be helping that will help people today rather than focus on the past, or get upset by perceived infractions. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How can you mistranslate and come up with two names if they aren't supposedly in the original? Sounds totally fabricated" Xmas? Book to sell? Royal family? Colour me shocked! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 fucking hilarious thread
Who was the person named though? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" White people are less than 10% of the global population, if racism is such a problem for you you're welcome to go live somewhere we aren't, no ones stopping you. Cheers. The absolute classic line…… Thank you for proving my point……. " what are your feelings on the use of sl4very In Ghana today? Do you want to see it stopped? Isn't that more important than looking at the past? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Who cares anyway. With all going on In world. Why do we give a toss about royal prince tantrums and cashing out " Because it's all connected to the engineered decline of our country. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Who cares anyway. With all going on In world. Why do we give a toss about royal prince tantrums and cashing out Because it's all connected to the engineered decline of our country." I think the decline of this country is more about religion no longer being the core of the family unit and what can you do for your country. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Who cares anyway. With all going on In world. Why do we give a toss about royal prince tantrums and cashing out Because it's all connected to the engineered decline of our country." I would say you need to take a look at yourself and get some perspective. There is no attempted decline of your country. Do you give more back to the country then you take? Yes then good, are you able to see compassion? Yes or no if yes then good. Get some perspective, there is no conspiracy. But there is a use of the race card that the likes of opera Winfrey is helping to be used to get clicks. Simply it's an over reaction to what really is not a racist comment. Commenting on how brown a baby will be when one parent is browner than the other is a normal thing to say. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Who cares anyway. With all going on In world. Why do we give a toss about royal prince tantrums and cashing out Because it's all connected to the engineered decline of our country. I think the decline of this country is more about religion no longer being the core of the family unit and what can you do for your country. " yup it was much better when priests where never questioned | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Mischief making for the purpose of maintaining a public presence. (Not the OP’s post, the subject matter) "Yep And it's workung | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Who was named and to be fair I am mixed race, being asked what part of what parent will a child inherit is only racist if your an idiot. It's like saying do you think he will have your eyes or hers. The queen married a Greek remember when back in the day that was about as common as marrying an alien. You can make anything about race if you want to. But allowing one race of people to say one thing and not allowing another race to say the same thing is a form of verbal apartheid. If one race can say something then the other race should be able to otherwise if literally is the verbal definition of one rule for one race another for another. So if you have a ginger and someone with dark hair is it not ok to say do you think the baby will have your freckles? But not do you think the child may have some of your complexion?" Couldn't agree more. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Who cares anyway. With all going on In world. Why do we give a toss about royal prince tantrums and cashing out Because it's all connected to the engineered decline of our country. I think the decline of this country is more about religion no longer being the core of the family unit and what can you do for your country. yup it was much better when priests where never questioned " absolutely modern life has changed the fabric of reality that was a corner stone for centuries .
The decline of family unit and most people being Christian belief as the directive. Fast forward to 80s and boom the doors opened to where we are now. A free for all in society.
It will sort itself in the end just as Rome did lol | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Who cares anyway. With all going on In world. Why do we give a toss about royal prince tantrums and cashing out Because it's all connected to the engineered decline of our country. I think the decline of this country is more about religion no longer being the core of the family unit and what can you do for your country. " I'd agree with this, I have my reservations about religion but do see it's value in unifying a people to a common cause, and without it people will inevitably drift apart as life is no longer about serving a higher calling/greater good, but simply about self gratification. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" fucking hilarious thread
Who was the person named though? "Which bit made you laugh the most? It was king. Charles & Kate. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" yup it was much better when priests where never questioned " I absolutely get your point. However: That's a problem for "the church" not "religion" because, surprise surprise, you don't need to attend church to have a relationship with god. In fact, "organised" religion is only organised to keep people submissive and part them from their money...plus the Catholic sect of Christianity enabled abusers to flourish. If ever there was a reason to separate religion from the church, catholicism is it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Then you are creating one rule for one race and one for another which is the definition of apartheid " And thinking black people and white people are different "races" is the definition of ignorance. Black members of the human race. White members of the human race. There are no different "races", just different colours of the same race. We. Are. All. Human. Beings. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" yup it was much better when priests where never questioned I absolutely get your point. However: That's a problem for "the church" not "religion" because, surprise surprise, you don't need to attend church to have a relationship with god. In fact, "organised" religion is only organised to keep people submissive and part them from their money...plus the Catholic sect of Christianity enabled abusers to flourish. If ever there was a reason to separate religion from the church, catholicism is it. " I agree there has never been a time when religion has caused more trouble than it gives benefit. does anyone know how religion has ever been the cause of conflict or hate? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Then you are creating one rule for one race and one for another which is the definition of apartheid And thinking black people and white people are different "races" is the definition of ignorance. Black members of the human race. White members of the human race. There are no different "races", just different colours of the same race. We. Are. All. Human. Beings." indeed I agree so why make rules for humans of one level of melanin in the skin than another we are all humans. So if one white couple says oh he has you your brown eyes to a couple who have just had a baby, how would it be any different when the other couple maybe are not both white? It's no different it's not racism unless your a demented snowflake | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Then you are creating one rule for one race and one for another which is the definition of apartheid And thinking black people and white people are different "races" is the definition of ignorance. Black members of the human race. White members of the human race. There are no different "races", just different colours of the same race. We. Are. All. Human. Beings." That'd be a lovely sentiment if all people's felt that way - they don't. And one of our greatest errors we make in the West is the belief that our way of thinking is universal across the world, when as we're increasingly seeing in events which have played out over these past years, tribalism and the desire to dominate and conquer is as strong as ever. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I agree there has never been a time when religion has caused more trouble than it gives benefit. does anyone know how religion has ever been the cause of conflict or hate? " Religion was used as a cause in the past...mostly by zealous idiotic rulers who fancied a land or power grab in another part of the world. The people who were told they had to fight, in all likleyhood, probably didn't want to. I know I wouldn't want to fight in a war that only made life better for the bloke at the top. I see wars started and/or fought using "religion" as being about everything else but religion...and only using religion as a mask to hide the true purpose. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Then you are creating one rule for one race and one for another which is the definition of apartheid And thinking black people and white people are different "races" is the definition of ignorance. Black members of the human race. White members of the human race. There are no different "races", just different colours of the same race. We. Are. All. Human. Beings." I think you will find there are. For reasons of definition there are races to ignore this would be stupid. For example the nhs has to find out the racial make up of a baby. Not to be racist but because dependant on ancestry you are more likely to get some illnesses than another. To be blind to it would mean your can't plan for it. But one race is no better than the other. But for example skin cancer is more likely to happen in one race than another. You could maybe re term the name race and call it something else but it is a definition and to say we are all the same is simply not true as years of living in different parts of the world has made the human race different. For example skin cancer is far higher in Australia than in a similarly hot country in Africa, why not because the sun is any different. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" . I think you will find there are. For reasons of definition there are races to ignore this would be stupid. For example the nhs has to find out the racial make up of a baby. Not to be racist but because dependant on ancestry you are more likely to get some illnesses than another. To be blind to it would mean your can't plan for it. But one race is no better than the other. But for example skin cancer is more likely to happen in one race than another. You could maybe re term the name race and call it something else but it is a definition and to say we are all the same is simply not true as years of living in different parts of the world has made the human race different. For example skin cancer is far higher in Australia than in a similarly hot country in Africa, why not because the sun is any different. " Semantics. And/or genetics. Not race. Different diseases have higher incidences for different skin colours. That's obviously true. Still all members of the human race though, despite the skin colour, the genetic disposition to suffer from different diseases, the colour of hair or eyes etc etc. Beyond absolutely everything, and regardless of absolutely everything, we are all members of the human race. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" fucking hilarious thread
Who was the person named though?
Which bit made you laugh the most?
It was king. Charles & Kate."Charles and Kate. That is so unsurprising if true.
There’s so much that made me laugh not fair to single out individual comments. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" indeed Philip the most British of all our monarchs. To be fair let's me clear someone asked if part of one person's DNA will be past onto their offspring. Is this racism ? It can be. Depends on intent. "Will the baby be black?"
Or
"Will the baby be black?" will the baby be ginger? Will the baby be blond also what if a black person said would the baby be black if you say that's not racist. Then you are creating one rule for one race and one for another which is the definition of apartheid "What on earth are you on about? You're just making things up that you think I said.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Apparently, Piers Morgan has named the two as Cathrine & King Charles. I bet you they asked what kind of skin type the baby will have. It's a pretty standard thing to ask of any two people who come together share DNA and then produce a baby. Oh he has your nose, oh he has his dad's eyes. So your telling me it's now racist to say oh do you think he will have some of your complexion if the person you'd saying it to is mixed race? Again it's insane, everyone does this, genetics are shared and it's typical to ask which features do you think the baby will have. Charles is probably hopeful Harry's gingerness is removed as we know there are no gingers in the royal bloodline so harry, genetically should not be ginger if he comes from the DNA of his father and the DNA of his mother. So rather than being horrified of having a baby that's no ginger like his dad they probably want them not to be. Why is Harry ginger by the way? I think someone doesn't understand the genetics of recessive genes. " There are very few characteristics that are controlled by single genes, so the concepts of dominance and recessiveness are rarely definitive. Adam Rutherford has written some excellent books on inheritance if you are interested. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" . I think you will find there are. For reasons of definition there are races to ignore this would be stupid. For example the nhs has to find out the racial make up of a baby. Not to be racist but because dependant on ancestry you are more likely to get some illnesses than another. To be blind to it would mean your can't plan for it. But one race is no better than the other. But for example skin cancer is more likely to happen in one race than another. You could maybe re term the name race and call it something else but it is a definition and to say we are all the same is simply not true as years of living in different parts of the world has made the human race different. For example skin cancer is far higher in Australia than in a similarly hot country in Africa, why not because the sun is any different. Semantics. And/or genetics. Not race. Different diseases have higher incidences for different skin colours. That's obviously true. Still all members of the human race though, despite the skin colour, the genetic disposition to suffer from different diseases, the colour of hair or eyes etc etc. Beyond absolutely everything, and regardless of absolutely everything, we are all members of the human race. " call it what you will race it's semantic your being pathetic of course we are all human but plan for all you plan for none | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s not racist to speculate on the appearance of a mixed race child. I’m Heinz 57 and the mum is a fair Celt. We spent most of the pregnancy debating it. As it happens our kids took my colouring, but my daughter’s second child is as fair as granny. Load of bollocks" Agreed.. and this has been going on for 300 years apparently | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s not racist to speculate on the appearance of a mixed race child. I’m Heinz 57 and the mum is a fair Celt. We spent most of the pregnancy debating it. As it happens our kids took my colouring, but my daughter’s second child is as fair as granny. It is racist very very racist. Far more damaging than lynching and segregation and Jim crow laws Load of bollocks" | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Wondering about a baby’s colour etc is not being racist. I’m coloured and since childhood I remember adults discussing with excitement how the baby will look. " It's the motivation for asking which dictates whether its a racist act or not. Obviously, we're not privy to that level of information. Cal | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just reading the daily fail, and there is an article that suggests that Megan may be dropped by her Hollywood talent agency over the naming of the royals. It seems that she may have over stepped the mark and upset the Hollywood luvvies." If that's true it's disgusting. Proof of the bullying and gaslighting AT Harry and Meghan. People have done far worse. They just want to live their lives. It's sick. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They just want to live their lives. " So why write two books about their family relationships and talk to Oprah ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s not racist to speculate on the appearance of a mixed race child. I’m Heinz 57 and the mum is a fair Celt. We spent most of the pregnancy debating it. As it happens our kids took my colouring, but my daughter’s second child is as fair as granny. Load of bollocks" There’s a difference between I wonder how they’ll look and concern at how dark they’ll be. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They just want to live their lives. So why write two books about their family relationships and talk to Oprah ?" Pretty much the whole world is bitching about them. Any human would want the chance to put their side of the story. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They just want to live their lives. So why write two books about their family relationships and talk to Oprah ? Pretty much the whole world is bitching about them. Any human would want the chance to put their side of the story." And the great thing about the way they did it is there’s no shouty man to not let them speak | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Quite funny how we are so easily distracted and totally 100% miss the real stuff like if you die in cornwall without leaving a will the duke of cornwall get's everything and one year the then prince charles got £60 million from it ?? "Start a thread on this. Up north too this happens. What's going on here guys? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Quite funny how we are so easily distracted and totally 100% miss the real stuff like if you die in cornwall without leaving a will the duke of cornwall get's everything and one year the then prince charles got £60 million from it ?? "Rather than complaining, make a will. Leave it to anyone or to the cat/dog etc. Takes a few minutes. There are ready made forms available too. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Endgame printed in Holland, which is a country where people were clogs and live tulips, names two high level royal racists. The author claims that it was a translation error. How can this be if they weren’t names in the books printed in English? Is this just a publicity stunt to sell more books, at the royals expense? It’s all over the news. “Credit to EssexTom for this post style”" You forgot, what's it all about? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Endgame printed in Holland, which is a country where people were clogs and live tulips, names two high level royal racists. The author claims that it was a translation error. How can this be if they weren’t names in the books printed in English? Is this just a publicity stunt to sell more books, at the royals expense? It’s all over the news. “Credit to EssexTom for this post style” You forgot, what's it all about?" What's it all about guys ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They just want to live their lives. So why write two books about their family relationships and talk to Oprah ? Pretty much the whole world is bitching about them. Any human would want the chance to put their side of the story. And the great thing about the way they did it is there’s no shouty man to not let them speak" Prince William? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They just want to live their lives. So why write two books about their family relationships and talk to Oprah ? Pretty much the whole world is bitching about them. Any human would want the chance to put their side of the story. And the great thing about the way they did it is there’s no shouty man to not let them speak" Poor old Harry has no say anyway, his narcissistic wife sees to that. She’s a professional victim, earning from her pity play. Anyone with half a brain can see right through the whole pathetic charade. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They just want to live their lives. So why write two books about their family relationships and talk to Oprah ? Pretty much the whole world is bitching about them. Any human would want the chance to put their side of the story. And the great thing about the way they did it is there’s no shouty man to not let them speak Poor old Harry has no say anyway, his narcissistic wife sees to that. She’s a professional victim, earning from her pity play. Anyone with half a brain can see right through the whole pathetic charade. " Maybe she's a hotwife because he's a shit shag and she can't stand him. That's how it always works. Anyone with half a brain knows that. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They just want to live their lives. So why write two books about their family relationships and talk to Oprah ? Pretty much the whole world is bitching about them. Any human would want the chance to put their side of the story. And the great thing about the way they did it is there’s no shouty man to not let them speak Poor old Harry has no say anyway, his narcissistic wife sees to that. She’s a professional victim, earning from her pity play. Anyone with half a brain can see right through the whole pathetic charade. Maybe she's a hotwife because he's a shit shag and she can't stand him. That's how it always works. Anyone with half a brain knows that. "My opinion is she has taken a wrecking ball to the family. Before marriage, Harry was so popular. The two brothers used to party together. Then comes the tsunami. I began feeling sorry for Harry, with all his personal background history. But as they began to vent in public, Oprah Winfrey etc, I gave up. Family Guy cartoon summed it up well. Learnt a new phrase here “pity play”. Though I doubt anyone has pity left. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They just want to live their lives. So why write two books about their family relationships and talk to Oprah ? Pretty much the whole world is bitching about them. Any human would want the chance to put their side of the story. And the great thing about the way they did it is there’s no shouty man to not let them speak Poor old Harry has no say anyway, his narcissistic wife sees to that. She’s a professional victim, earning from her pity play. Anyone with half a brain can see right through the whole pathetic charade. " Especially you, the cleverest of us all. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They just want to live their lives. So why write two books about their family relationships and talk to Oprah ? Pretty much the whole world is bitching about them. Any human would want the chance to put their side of the story. And the great thing about the way they did it is there’s no shouty man to not let them speak Poor old Harry has no say anyway, his narcissistic wife sees to that. She’s a professional victim, earning from her pity play. Anyone with half a brain can see right through the whole pathetic charade. " i know its almost chrimbo but no need for the C word at the end | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I just think it’s absolutely hilarious that a mixed race woman joins the family and exactly what you predict would happen in the family and in the media and with the public seems to have happened. And people that this family literally doesn’t give two shits about at on every corner of the internet defending their right and reason to hate a complete stranger (even after she said it almost led her to unalive). Have some shame "Man if it was a Black man or woman this country would’ve melted into nothingness | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They just want to live their lives. So why write two books about their family relationships and talk to Oprah ? Pretty much the whole world is bitching about them. Any human would want the chance to put their side of the story. And the great thing about the way they did it is there’s no shouty man to not let them speak Poor old Harry has no say anyway, his narcissistic wife sees to that. She’s a professional victim, earning from her pity play. Anyone with half a brain can see right through the whole pathetic charade. Especially you, the cleverest of us all. "Yes, as usual you confirm my suspicions. Do have a good evening. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They just want to live their lives. So why write two books about their family relationships and talk to Oprah ? Pretty much the whole world is bitching about them. Any human would want the chance to put their side of the story. And the great thing about the way they did it is there’s no shouty man to not let them speak Poor old Harry has no say anyway, his narcissistic wife sees to that. She’s a professional victim, earning from her pity play. Anyone with half a brain can see right through the whole pathetic charade. Maybe she's a hotwife because he's a shit shag and she can't stand him. That's how it always works. Anyone with half a brain knows that. "There’s definitely mileage in this theory. Maybe he’s locked in his cock cage.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
