Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |  |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
I looked with 1 eye closed so it doesn't count 
Mrs C | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He looks great The poor guy though having photos like that published with the intent to embarrass him and his brother. " He published them himself on a website called “guys with iPhones” a few years ago. He does look great doesn’t he. Quite the dilf | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He looks great The poor guy though having photos like that published with the intent to embarrass him and his brother. He published them himself on a website called “guys with iPhones” a few years ago. He does look great doesn’t he. Quite the dilf " If he did (and he denies it) that doesn't give the press the right to publish them. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He looks great The poor guy though having photos like that published with the intent to embarrass him and his brother. He published them himself on a website called “guys with iPhones” a few years ago. He does look great doesn’t he. Quite the dilf If he did (and he denies it) that doesn't give the press the right to publish them. " If he’s put it in the public domain and agreed to the terms of service then yes, the press can buy the rights . Also if it’s in the public interest, they can again publish. But let’s be clear he totally did post them himself. I’ve been reading and there’s tons of men who are referencing speaking to him on there and other sites. No judgement here - he looks great. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He looks great The poor guy though having photos like that published with the intent to embarrass him and his brother. He published them himself on a website called “guys with iPhones” a few years ago. He does look great doesn’t he. Quite the dilf If he did (and he denies it) that doesn't give the press the right to publish them. If he’s put it in the public domain and agreed to the terms of service then yes, the press can buy the rights . Also if it’s in the public interest, they can again publish. But let’s be clear he totally did post them himself. I’ve been reading and there’s tons of men who are referencing speaking to him on there and other sites. No judgement here - he looks great." I think he's doing what I would do and trying plausible deniability. I just think how any of us would feel in his position. No judgement from me either | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He looks great The poor guy though having photos like that published with the intent to embarrass him and his brother. He published them himself on a website called “guys with iPhones” a few years ago. He does look great doesn’t he. Quite the dilf If he did (and he denies it) that doesn't give the press the right to publish them. If he’s put it in the public domain and agreed to the terms of service then yes, the press can buy the rights . Also if it’s in the public interest, they can again publish. But let’s be clear he totally did post them himself. I’ve been reading and there’s tons of men who are referencing speaking to him on there and other sites. No judgement here - he looks great." You'll be ok with people showing your Fab pics round the pub/ posting on multiple public websites then.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He looks great The poor guy though having photos like that published with the intent to embarrass him and his brother. He published them himself on a website called “guys with iPhones” a few years ago. He does look great doesn’t he. Quite the dilf If he did (and he denies it) that doesn't give the press the right to publish them. If he’s put it in the public domain and agreed to the terms of service then yes, the press can buy the rights . Also if it’s in the public interest, they can again publish. But let’s be clear he totally did post them himself. I’ve been reading and there’s tons of men who are referencing speaking to him on there and other sites. No judgement here - he looks great. You'll be ok with people showing your Fab pics round the pub/ posting on multiple public websites then. "Do fabs terms and conditions say they can sell the rights? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
