FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Schoolchildren in Nappies

Jump to newest
 

By *ssex_tom OP   Man
over a year ago

Colchester

Reports that 90% of reception and year 1 primary teachers have experience of pupils attending school in nappies. Unheard of even a decade ago. Are mothering skills in decline. What's going on here? It's all over the news

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ottodot123Couple
over a year ago

Gillingham

What about fathering skills Tom ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Definitely was a thing 10 years ago as well, not sure where you get your news stories from. My daughter started alongside some children still wearing nappies, no one judged them for it though.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tom OP   Man
over a year ago

Colchester

Who is expected to change the nappies at school ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *randMrsLPCouple
over a year ago

london

What staggered me the other day was possibly the children mum at a car dealership, gave a DUMMY to a child who looked at least 8 years old

Re nappies, some children can be late letting go of nappies for various reasons, thankfully all of ours and grand kids stopped wearing them what was deamed 'early'

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Tbf Tom this was happening a lot 15 or so yrs ago. I reckon many of these kids are actually toilet trained and parents put them in these for convenience. Many sadistic teachers love refusing kids needs for the loo and if they’re only there for a few hours (reception), no harm done

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *emorefridaCouple
over a year ago

La la land

Children wetting themselves in school has always been an issue. I remember this occuring when I was little. These things happen, maybe parents are trying to prevent that embarrassment for their child.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Reports that 90% of reception and year 1 primary teachers have experience of pupils attending school in nappies. Unheard of even a decade ago. Are mothering skills in decline. What's going on here? It's all over the news"

I was under the impression they had to be potty trained before going to school

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *imisugarWoman
over a year ago

Rugby


"What about fathering skills Tom ?

"

My thought entirely.

Not sure why the first assumption is lazy parenting. The child may have a medical or development issue. There isn't enough support or schooling places for children with additional needs yet school is mandatory. Not everyone is equipped for home schooling.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

East Sussex

When I was at school with Noah's children there would be one of two other pupils who set themselves quite frequently. Teachers kept spare clothes for the occasion. It was humiliating for the kids and teachers had to take time out from teaching to help them change. I'm guessing the 'nappies' avoid that.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

East Sussex

^^ 'wet ' themselves

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *piderBunnyCouple
over a year ago

Back of Nowhere and Beyond


"When I was at school with Noah's children there would be one of two other pupils who set themselves quite frequently. Teachers kept spare clothes for the occasion. It was humiliating for the kids and teachers had to take time out from teaching to help them change. I'm guessing the 'nappies' avoid that. "

Ooh. I've always wanted to know... did Noah's kids go on and on about the cruise they went on?

Posh

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

East Sussex


"When I was at school with Noah's children there would be one of two other pupils who set themselves quite frequently. Teachers kept spare clothes for the occasion. It was humiliating for the kids and teachers had to take time out from teaching to help them change. I'm guessing the 'nappies' avoid that.

Ooh. I've always wanted to know... did Noah's kids go on and on about the cruise they went on?

Posh "

Yes! And the flaming pets they owned.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *a LunaWoman
over a year ago

South Wales

The Primary Schools my whippersnappers attended wouldn’t take them if they were in nappies. They had to be toilet trained.

Same as if they have toilet accidents in School - you had to attend to clean them up, the Teachers could not (child safety and all that jazz) and before anyone harps on about children having accident toilets in School etc., i mean children with additional needs or those that have been ill.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ools and the brainCouple
over a year ago

couple, us we him her.


"The Primary Schools my whippersnappers attended wouldn’t take them if they were in nappies. They had to be toilet trained.

Same as if they have toilet accidents in School - you had to attend to clean them up, the Teachers could not (child safety and all that jazz) and before anyone harps on about children having accident toilets in School etc., i mean children with additional needs or those that have been ill."

I would imagine that they are not allowed to exclude children these days who have been potty trained for fear of making them feel victimised.

Can't say I'd want to change someone else's kid's shitty nap py, didn't even like doing my own kid's but then I have an extremely weak gag reflex

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ools and the brainCouple
over a year ago

couple, us we him her.

Well that's just odd the site filters will allow me to say nappies but not nap py ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hunky ChefMan
over a year ago

Norwich

They lied about it 10 years ago.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"When I was at school with Noah's children there would be one of two other pupils who set themselves quite frequently. Teachers kept spare clothes for the occasion. It was humiliating for the kids and teachers had to take time out from teaching to help them change. I'm guessing the 'nappies' avoid that.

Ooh. I've always wanted to know... did Noah's kids go on and on about the cruise they went on?

Posh

Yes! And the flaming pets they owned. "

So the plural of the N word is allowed but singular is not. Please explain why?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Well that's just odd the site filters will allow me to say nappies but not nap py ?"

Same..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Yet na ppy is also a guys fetish

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Some grown men like being in nappies still.

These are amateur ages.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atnip make me purrWoman
over a year ago

Reading

Poverty is whats happening. Parents working 2 jobs to survive. Also i wonder how many of the kids are special needs?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ottodot123Couple
over a year ago

Gillingham


"What about fathering skills Tom ?

My thought entirely.

Not sure why the first assumption is lazy parenting. The child may have a medical or development issue. There isn't enough support or schooling places for children with additional needs yet school is mandatory. Not everyone is equipped for home schooling. "

Exactly this. Great answer.

Along with the one above about poverty.

Lots and lots of social factors an influence on this. Lazy parenting being lower down the end of the list I would say.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tom OP   Man
over a year ago

Colchester

If a family pet such as a dog or cat is not litter trained or house trained after four years then would it be lazy pet ownership ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nightsoftheCoffeeTableCouple
over a year ago

Leeds


"Reports that 90% of reception and year 1 primary teachers have experience of pupils attending school in nappies. Unheard of even a decade ago. Are mothering skills in decline. What's going on here? It's all over the news"

Why just mothering skills, do dad's not have this responsibility?

Mrs

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tsJustKateWoman
over a year ago

London


"What about fathering skills Tom ?

"

The term 'Mothering' isnt just for females. Anyone can Mother someone.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rozac_fairyCouple
over a year ago

tamworth

It's pretty simple really. Some 4 and 5 yeah old still struggle with using the toilet.

School isn't an environment where they can freely do so. And accidents happen or toilet training is delayed. 6 hours of being there can be difficult.

So any child who is still using nappies at this age (most are more like pull ups) just gets put onto a care plan within school to help promote toilet training inline with the parents, there is also arranged slots for the child to be changed.

It's no big deal. It was pretty standard practice when I was at reception and primary school and that was 30 years ago. Hardly news worthy.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *om and JennieCouple
over a year ago

Chams or Socials


"What staggered me the other day was possibly the children mum at a car dealership, gave a DUMMY to a child who looked at least 8 years old

Re nappies, some children can be late letting go of nappies for various reasons, thankfully all of ours and grand kids stopped wearing them what was deamed 'early'"

Maybe that child was actually disabled or had learning difficulties?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *imisugarWoman
over a year ago

Rugby


"If a family pet such as a dog or cat is not litter trained or house trained after four years then would it be lazy pet ownership ?"

Comparing children to pets is a bit too far.

Plenty of animals struggle in this respect, especially towards their later years, changes to environment or sickness.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tom OP   Man
over a year ago

Colchester


"If a family pet such as a dog or cat is not litter trained or house trained after four years then would it be lazy pet ownership ?

Comparing children to pets is a bit too far.

Plenty of animals struggle in this respect, especially towards their later years, changes to environment or sickness.

"

This is not later years but younger years...

Is this a parenting issue ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *imisugarWoman
over a year ago

Rugby


"If a family pet such as a dog or cat is not litter trained or house trained after four years then would it be lazy pet ownership ?

Comparing children to pets is a bit too far.

Plenty of animals struggle in this respect, especially towards their later years, changes to environment or sickness.

This is not later years but younger years...

Is this a parenting issue ?

"

Again my previous post, I do not believe all cases are lazy parenting. There will be an element of it. I couldn't say if it's lack or knowledge or support.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tom OP   Man
over a year ago

Colchester

Teachers are there not there to change nappies. If they are not toilet trained to then should they be at school..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *imisugarWoman
over a year ago

Rugby


"Teachers are there not there to change nappies. If they are not toilet trained to then should they be at school.. "

As school is mandatory and you have the viewpoint it's lazy parenting. What do you think happens to children when their parents are in trouble for truancy? If too lazy to toilet train, home schooling wouldn't be on the agenda.

You seem incredibly bothered about a subject that won't affect your daily life.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tom OP   Man
over a year ago

Colchester


"Teachers are there not there to change nappies. If they are not toilet trained to then should they be at school..

As school is mandatory and you have the viewpoint it's lazy parenting. What do you think happens to children when their parents are in trouble for truancy? If too lazy to toilet train, home schooling wouldn't be on the agenda.

You seem incredibly bothered about a subject that won't affect your daily life. "

You assume that it does not affect Toms daily life ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *imisugarWoman
over a year ago

Rugby


"Teachers are there not there to change nappies. If they are not toilet trained to then should they be at school..

As school is mandatory and you have the viewpoint it's lazy parenting. What do you think happens to children when their parents are in trouble for truancy? If too lazy to toilet train, home schooling wouldn't be on the agenda.

You seem incredibly bothered about a subject that won't affect your daily life.

You assume that it does not affect Toms daily life ?"

Yes if your profile age is accurate.

Please feel free to correct me

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tom OP   Man
over a year ago

Colchester


"Teachers are there not there to change nappies. If they are not toilet trained to then should they be at school..

As school is mandatory and you have the viewpoint it's lazy parenting. What do you think happens to children when their parents are in trouble for truancy? If too lazy to toilet train, home schooling wouldn't be on the agenda.

You seem incredibly bothered about a subject that won't affect your daily life.

You assume that it does not affect Toms daily life ?

Yes if your profile age is accurate.

Please feel free to correct me "

Oh, Tom forgot that you cannot father a child in later years. Age shaming at it's best

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Some children are born with small bladders so nappies have to be worn. Nothing to do with mothering laziness Op. I have supported persons and it is my duty of care even in adulthood OP nappies are worn because of weak bladders or anything else that prevents the said person to pass water.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Teachers are there not there to change nappies. If they are not toilet trained to then should they be at school..

As school is mandatory and you have the viewpoint it's lazy parenting. What do you think happens to children when their parents are in trouble for truancy? If too lazy to toilet train, home schooling wouldn't be on the agenda.

You seem incredibly bothered about a subject that won't affect your daily life.

You assume that it does not affect Toms daily life ?

Yes if your profile age is accurate.

Please feel free to correct me

Oh, Tom forgot that you cannot father a child in later years. Age shaming at it's best "

Males can adopt children who have Enurethis.. Small bladder which means they cannot control passing water.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *imisugarWoman
over a year ago

Rugby


"Teachers are there not there to change nappies. If they are not toilet trained to then should they be at school..

As school is mandatory and you have the viewpoint it's lazy parenting. What do you think happens to children when their parents are in trouble for truancy? If too lazy to toilet train, home schooling wouldn't be on the agenda.

You seem incredibly bothered about a subject that won't affect your daily life.

You assume that it does not affect Toms daily life ?

Yes if your profile age is accurate.

Please feel free to correct me

Oh, Tom forgot that you cannot father a child in later years. Age shaming at it's best "

Are you outing yourself as a lazy parent? I've done no age shaming in the slightest. I'm assuming this is your conversation style, your viewpoint only. If not convincing your audience gaslight and manipulate.

I was suggesting you are not an active teacher encounting this situation personally on a regular basis.

You could always start a petition and hope to attain 10,000 signatures to have it heard in parliament.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *ssex_tom OP   Man
over a year ago

Colchester

10000,?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top