FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

The mass of a penis:

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Prompted by an earlier message about body mass percentages Vs penis size.

I've decided to approximate peniseses mathematically.

Assuming a blood filled vessel that's modelled as a simple cylinder, it's volume (p.radius².length) can be calculated.

Let's assume an above average 10 inch product equating to 25.4cm in length with a 7.5 inch girth (19cm) circumference (slightly smaller than a can of ) equating to a 3cm radius. We estimate the volume to be around 720cm³. It's mass translates directly to a 0.7kg product.

This represents (roughly) 1% of the body mass of a 70kg (11 stone) adult. I say roughly because the redistribution of blood would have an effect.

Congolese men average 7.1 inches (controversial). With a more reasonable 4.6 inch girth equates to a product that's slightly under 0.2kg

I hope this has been informative.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mf123Man
over a year ago

with one foot out the door

Good work

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Do you not have Netflix op?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

My head hurts.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aitonelMan
over a year ago

Travelling


"My head hurts."

Your penis head?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *bi HaiveMan
Forum Mod

over a year ago

Cheeseville, Somerset

Dicks aren't hollow though......

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Good point , they have fibrous chambers that fill with blood , but not hollow, so maths out of the window.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aizyWoman
over a year ago

west midlands

Thanks OP very informative, no idea what any of it means mind

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hunkyBuggaMan
over a year ago

Devon

What about non catholic penises

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ornucopiaMan
over a year ago

Bexley

For a long time I have been of the opinion that the fairest way to measure cocks is by volume and the obvious 'Eureka' method would be by displacement of water in a suitable measuring vessel.

The gymnastics involved have kept me from bothering but don't think it hasn't crossed my mind!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central


"For a long time I have been of the opinion that the fairest way to measure cocks is by volume and the obvious 'Eureka' method would be by displacement of water in a suitable measuring vessel.

The gymnastics involved have kept me from bothering but don't think it hasn't crossed my mind!"

I think the displacement method is going to be closer to the real world experience that we get, when we get to feel it inside of us

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uke_silverMan
over a year ago

London

I hate that this is the first question that popped into my head, but where did you get the density?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"I hate that this is the first question that popped into my head, but where did you get the density?"

You're absolutely correct in asking this question. The average density of blood is 0.994?g/mL ± 0.032?g. I made the assumption that this was close enough to water.

I appreciate the model is lacking, there's approximations throughout.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ou only live onceMan
over a year ago

London


"I hate that this is the first question that popped into my head, but where did you get the density?

You're absolutely correct in asking this question. The average density of blood is 0.994?g/mL ± 0.032?g. I made the assumption that this was close enough to water.

I appreciate the model is lacking, there's approximations throughout."

"You'll always find me in the kitchen at parties..."

(Only joking, OP. Impressive effort!)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uke_silverMan
over a year ago

London


"I hate that this is the first question that popped into my head, but where did you get the density?

You're absolutely correct in asking this question. The average density of blood is 0.994?g/mL ± 0.032?g. I made the assumption that this was close enough to water.

I appreciate the model is lacking, there's approximations throughout."

Yeah, I assumed. So, you're approximating a penis with a cylindrical test tube of blood. To improve the model, I'd look into the percentage of a penis that is skin and tissue because I doubt it's mostly blood. That should give a better estimate of density. The cylinder approximation for volume is probably alright though.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ornucopiaMan
over a year ago

Bexley


"For a long time I have been of the opinion that the fairest way to measure cocks is by volume and the obvious 'Eureka' method would be by displacement of water in a suitable measuring vessel.

The gymnastics involved have kept me from bothering but don't think it hasn't crossed my mind!

I think the displacement method is going to be closer to the real world experience that we get, when we get to feel it inside of us "

I'm mindful of the fact that it is the OP's thread and that his interest is in

mass rather than volume. Not that the two aren't related.

However, I'm rather partial to the phrase 'Massive hard on', so in that context mass could be more important than volume.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Now this is a fascinating topic. So much better than "what size dick do women want?".

Is there a reason you did a comparison with Congolese men?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *enrietteandSamCouple
over a year ago

Staffordshire

Do I need to weigh my beautiful penis ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


" Now this is a fascinating topic. So much better than "what size dick do women want?".

Is there a reason you did a comparison with Congolese men? "

Published materials on the size of one's penis almost unanimously conclude that Congolese men are top of god's blessings.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oodmessMan
over a year ago

yumsville


"For a long time I have been of the opinion that the fairest way to measure cocks is by volume and the obvious 'Eureka' method would be by displacement of water in a suitable measuring vessel.

The gymnastics involved have kept me from bothering but don't think it hasn't crossed my mind!

I think the displacement method is going to be closer to the real world experience that we get, when we get to feel it inside of us "

To add another x/y x (z)/r... my cock seems to float in the bath, I can't remember it sinking anyway

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *enrietteandSamCouple
over a year ago

Staffordshire

As a young man I almost only drank umbongo.

Which as everyone knows is what they drink in the Congo!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


" Now this is a fascinating topic. So much better than "what size dick do women want?".

Is there a reason you did a comparison with Congolese men?

Published materials on the size of one's penis almost unanimously conclude that Congolese men are top of god's blessings."

What a delicious way to describe it. Thank you.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ickshawedCouple
over a year ago

Wolverhampton

Just chop it off and measure it. Problem solved

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *ou only live onceMan
over a year ago

London


"Just chop it off and measure it. Problem solved "

Get me Bobbit on the phone, now!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top