FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Cut or uncut

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

What do people prefer?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iss-boobsWoman
over a year ago

staffordshire

Cut every time

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I tear it with my teeth

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *heonixrising500Man
over a year ago

Barnsley

I uncut for all to see

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I don't mind either but I do like cut.

I'm going to get shot for this aren't I.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I tear it with my teeth "

Well you chose violence didn't you.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ulieAndBeefCouple
over a year ago

Manchester-ish

This thread appears regularly and it always makes me smile. The thought of someone getting circumcised because HotlistChick69 says she likes cut. And then knitting and stapling on a new foreskin because SexyTits80085 says she prefers uncut.

If I *had* to express a preference then probably uncut. It's what I'm used to and I like the way the skin glides over the hardness underneath. But as always if I'm at the stage where I'm naked with someone then the presence or lack of foreskin is going to make no difference whatsoever.

J

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"I tear it with my teeth "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *partharmonyCouple
over a year ago

Ruislip

Like all body parts, we prefer them without bits cut off them. Do you prefer ears with the lobes cut off? Do you prefer feet with a toe missing? Why would you prefer a penis with the foreskin cut off it? It's supposed to be there. If it has to be taken off for medical reasons then that's unfortunate, but how this becomes a preference baffles me.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I prefer uncut, I don’t know why but that’s always been my preference

Mrs

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aitonelMan
over a year ago

Liverpool

Are you looking for validation for your own?

Because what people prefer is really of little consequences.

If you are uncut and people prefer cut, are you going to get cut?

If you are cut and they prefer uncut, well kinda screwed there aren't you.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icolerobbieCouple
over a year ago

walsall

Uncut.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I tear it with my teeth

Well you chose violence didn't you. "

Oh hang on, something tells me we’re not talking about sellotape?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hong80321967Man
over a year ago

Wakefield

Happy to try either

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ose manMan
over a year ago

kells

Cut does be nice

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I don't have a preference as long as it is well looked after

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Are you looking for validation for your own?

Because what people prefer is really of little consequences.

If you are uncut and people prefer cut, are you going to get cut?

If you are cut and they prefer uncut, well kinda screwed there aren't you."

There are ways of stretching and getting it "kind of" back, not talking elephant trunk flesh sock original style, just a lip around the periphery.

But yeah, who cares. I like mine as it is and I've had no complaints. (Nobody's been around it, hence no complaints.)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I don't mind either but I do like cut.

I'm going to get shot for this aren't I."

Depends where you'd like me to shoot

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

If you're an adult male and you have chose to remove the cover then cool. One of the things I can't get my head around is the mutilation of boys as a religious act. Can you imagine a "how do you like your clitoris - natural or removed?" How do you like your labia "natural or cut and sewn shut?" Thread

Yes, I know they are two totally different things, but are they though.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"One of the things I can't get my head around is the mutilation of boys as a religious act.

"

Well one's practised by billions of people and legally accepted, and the other, isn't.

But it's an interesting discussion point, I'm guessing you're against East piercing, hormone therapy for transitioning children, implants, etc as well

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ecretSilverlinkMan
over a year ago

Manchester

love uncut. the skin is so good when sucking

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *partharmonyCouple
over a year ago

Ruislip


"One of the things I can't get my head around is the mutilation of boys as a religious act.

Well one's practised by billions of people and legally accepted, and the other, isn't.

But it's an interesting discussion point, I'm guessing you're against East piercing, hormone therapy for transitioning children, implants, etc as well "

Legal acceptance doesn't make cutting off a body part moral. The act is the same in principal whether it's done to a boy or a girl. It's genital mutilation. The law or acceptance by billions of people doesn't change that.

Yes, ear-piercing, implants etc. for non-medical reasons on children who have no say in the matter is also wrong.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

A question then. If, when you get to it a cock is already erect, can you even tell whether it's cut or uncut? Serious question.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"One of the things I can't get my head around is the mutilation of boys as a religious act.

Well one's practised by billions of people and legally accepted, and the other, isn't.

But it's an interesting discussion point, I'm guessing you're against East piercing, hormone therapy for transitioning children, implants, etc as well

Legal acceptance doesn't make cutting off a body part moral. The act is the same in principal whether it's done to a boy or a girl. It's genital mutilation. The law or acceptance by billions of people doesn't change that.

Yes, ear-piercing, implants etc. for non-medical reasons on children who have no say in the matter is also wrong. "

Quote from the internet (and we both know The Internet is always right):

Legal principles are based on the rights of the citizens and the state expressed in the rules. An action is permissible if it does not violate any of the written rules.

Morality is a body of principles that attempt to define what is good and bad conduct. Moral principles can be based on culture, religion, experiences, and personal values. An action is considered moral if it fits within those standards, though everyone has different standards.

Ergo: most people do this out of religious reasons, therefore it's moral.

Presumably you can't accept cutting the umbilical cord either? Perhaps there's a better way of birth that doesn't involve mutilating the mother and the baby?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icolerobbieCouple
over a year ago

walsall


"A question then. If, when you get to it a cock is already erect, can you even tell whether it's cut or uncut? Serious question."

Yes

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rishVikingMan
over a year ago

Shankill

I’m curious for those who like it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icolerobbieCouple
over a year ago

walsall


"One of the things I can't get my head around is the mutilation of boys as a religious act.

Well one's practised by billions of people and legally accepted, and the other, isn't.

But it's an interesting discussion point, I'm guessing you're against East piercing, hormone therapy for transitioning children, implants, etc as well

Legal acceptance doesn't make cutting off a body part moral. The act is the same in principal whether it's done to a boy or a girl. It's genital mutilation. The law or acceptance by billions of people doesn't change that.

Yes, ear-piercing, implants etc. for non-medical reasons on children who have no say in the matter is also wrong.

Quote from the internet (and we both know The Internet is always right):

Legal principles are based on the rights of the citizens and the state expressed in the rules. An action is permissible if it does not violate any of the written rules.

Morality is a body of principles that attempt to define what is good and bad conduct. Moral principles can be based on culture, religion, experiences, and personal values. An action is considered moral if it fits within those standards, though everyone has different standards.

Ergo: most people do this out of religious reasons, therefore it's moral.

Presumably you can't accept cutting the umbilical cord either? Perhaps there's a better way of birth that doesn't involve mutilating the mother and the baby?"

Cutting an umbilical chord at birth is not mutilation.

Permanently disfiguring a healthy set of genitals, male or female, in the name of religion, culture or any other bullshit reason is barbaric. Especially if it’s a young child who can’t make their own decision.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Mines uncut and it’s staying that way! They all look the same when it’s inside you or in the dark so just shut up and take it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Uncut because I’m not a fan of genital mutilation that we’ve for some reason just accepted

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Cutting an umbilical chord at birth is not mutilation.

Permanently disfiguring a healthy set of genitals, male or female, in the name of religion, culture or any other bullshit reason is barbaric. Especially if it’s a young child who can’t make their own decision."

We've just established what moral means. You take to a different set of sliding scales and apply your own arbitrary values as you see fit, that's hardly moral.

Legally it's acceptable (in males). Morally for the majority, it's also acceptable. You're in a tiny minority who believe otherwise because your value systems are completely different.

You used the terminology "mutilation" instead of cutting. Do you know what that word actually means?

Here's the Internet again:

an act or instance of destroying, removing, or severely damaging a limb or other body part of a person or animal

Circumcised dicks work, they work rather well. Ergo they're not severely damaged or destroyed. If anything they work better than their non cut counterparts. There's statistically less incidence of disease, and they're more hygienic. Those are the facts on the ground.

Presumably unnecessary cesarian sections (tummy mutilations) are unacceptable in order to rip out a child from the "birth chamber" without it's consent?

You're ok with mutilating the umbilical cord.

You're ok with stabbing a child with a sharp object to administer medication?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *bi HaiveMan
Forum Mod
over a year ago

Cheeseville, Somerset


"What do people prefer? "

I always wonder when people ask this question.....if you're uncut and most say 'cut'....would you actually get the scissors out?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *andering Welsh GuyMan
over a year ago

All over the place

I'm cut

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Weird question do they feel different?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Cutting an umbilical chord at birth is not mutilation.

Permanently disfiguring a healthy set of genitals, male or female, in the name of religion, culture or any other bullshit reason is barbaric. Especially if it’s a young child who can’t make their own decision.

We've just established what moral means. You take to a different set of sliding scales and apply your own arbitrary values as you see fit, that's hardly moral.

Legally it's acceptable (in males). Morally for the majority, it's also acceptable. You're in a tiny minority who believe otherwise because your value systems are completely different.

You used the terminology "mutilation" instead of cutting. Do you know what that word actually means?

Here's the Internet again:

an act or instance of destroying, removing, or severely damaging a limb or other body part of a person or animal

Circumcised dicks work, they work rather well. Ergo they're not severely damaged or destroyed. If anything they work better than their non cut counterparts. There's statistically less incidence of disease, and they're more hygienic. Those are the facts on the ground.

Presumably unnecessary cesarian sections (tummy mutilations) are unacceptable in order to rip out a child from the "birth chamber" without it's consent?

You're ok with mutilating the umbilical cord.

You're ok with stabbing a child with a sharp object to administer medication?"

Can’t believe we have pro “cut functional parts of your child’s body off without their consent” arguments

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyguyUKMan
over a year ago

worcester

Well mines cut lol not really a choice in the matter

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"What do people prefer? "

Uncut and nobody is cutting my skin, deal with it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"What do people prefer?

I always wonder when people ask this question.....if you're uncut and most say 'cut'....would you actually get the scissors out? "

No

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"One of the things I can't get my head around is the mutilation of boys as a religious act.

Well one's practised by billions of people and legally accepted, and the other, isn't.

But it's an interesting discussion point, I'm guessing you're against East piercing, hormone therapy for transitioning children, implants, etc as well

Legal acceptance doesn't make cutting off a body part moral. The act is the same in principal whether it's done to a boy or a girl. It's genital mutilation. The law or acceptance by billions of people doesn't change that.

Yes, ear-piercing, implants etc. for non-medical reasons on children who have no say in the matter is also wrong.

Quote from the internet (and we both know The Internet is always right):

Legal principles are based on the rights of the citizens and the state expressed in the rules. An action is permissible if it does not violate any of the written rules.

Morality is a body of principles that attempt to define what is good and bad conduct. Moral principles can be based on culture, religion, experiences, and personal values. An action is considered moral if it fits within those standards, though everyone has different standards.

Ergo: most people do this out of religious reasons, therefore it's moral.

Presumably you can't accept cutting the umbilical cord either? Perhaps there's a better way of birth that doesn't involve mutilating the mother and the baby?"

The umbilical cord isn't alive

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"One of the things I can't get my head around is the mutilation of boys as a religious act.

Well one's practised by billions of people and legally accepted, and the other, isn't.

But it's an interesting discussion point, I'm guessing you're against East piercing, hormone therapy for transitioning children, implants, etc as well "

You can guess all you want

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"One of the things I can't get my head around is the mutilation of boys as a religious act.

Well one's practised by billions of people and legally accepted, and the other, isn't.

But it's an interesting discussion point, I'm guessing you're against East piercing, hormone therapy for transitioning children, implants, etc as well

Legal acceptance doesn't make cutting off a body part moral. The act is the same in principal whether it's done to a boy or a girl. It's genital mutilation. The law or acceptance by billions of people doesn't change that.

Yes, ear-piercing, implants etc. for non-medical reasons on children who have no say in the matter is also wrong. "

Glad I'm not the only one x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *opman121Man
over a year ago

stoke on trent

Who likes a cheese four skin got to be cut Al day long

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"One of the things I can't get my head around is the mutilation of boys as a religious act.

Well one's practised by billions of people and legally accepted, and the other, isn't.

But it's an interesting discussion point, I'm guessing you're against East piercing, hormone therapy for transitioning children, implants, etc as well

Legal acceptance doesn't make cutting off a body part moral. The act is the same in principal whether it's done to a boy or a girl. It's genital mutilation. The law or acceptance by billions of people doesn't change that.

Yes, ear-piercing, implants etc. for non-medical reasons on children who have no say in the matter is also wrong.

Quote from the internet (and we both know The Internet is always right):

Legal principles are based on the rights of the citizens and the state expressed in the rules. An action is permissible if it does not violate any of the written rules.

Morality is a body of principles that attempt to define what is good and bad conduct. Moral principles can be based on culture, religion, experiences, and personal values. An action is considered moral if it fits within those standards, though everyone has different standards.

Ergo: most people do this out of religious reasons, therefore it's moral.

Presumably you can't accept cutting the umbilical cord either? Perhaps there's a better way of birth that doesn't involve mutilating the mother and the baby?"

Really? I mean really. Hardly the same ball park. What about certain religious sects that suck the blood from the child's penis after circumcision? Does the unbiblical cord factor into that equation too?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *7JamesMan
over a year ago

hants/wilts

It’s not hard to keep it clean

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Sorry to derail the tread.

Grown adult males - your Penis your choice

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nimaginativeUsernameMan
over a year ago

Rochester, Kent

I’m cut and I love it.

Nobody’s ever said they haven’t liked it… quite the opposite, in fact

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Oh keep going this is amusing.

And they say women...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *partharmonyCouple
over a year ago

Ruislip


"One of the things I can't get my head around is the mutilation of boys as a religious act.

Well one's practised by billions of people and legally accepted, and the other, isn't.

But it's an interesting discussion point, I'm guessing you're against East piercing, hormone therapy for transitioning children, implants, etc as well

Legal acceptance doesn't make cutting off a body part moral. The act is the same in principal whether it's done to a boy or a girl. It's genital mutilation. The law or acceptance by billions of people doesn't change that.

Yes, ear-piercing, implants etc. for non-medical reasons on children who have no say in the matter is also wrong.

Quote from the internet (and we both know The Internet is always right):

Legal principles are based on the rights of the citizens and the state expressed in the rules. An action is permissible if it does not violate any of the written rules.

Morality is a body of principles that attempt to define what is good and bad conduct. Moral principles can be based on culture, religion, experiences, and personal values. An action is considered moral if it fits within those standards, though everyone has different standards.

Ergo: most people do this out of religious reasons, therefore it's moral.

Presumably you can't accept cutting the umbilical cord either? Perhaps there's a better way of birth that doesn't involve mutilating the mother and the baby?"

That's absurd. By your argument if somebody sacrifices babies for religious reasons then it would be moral. Would you see it that way?

As you stated, different people have different moral standards. By my standards, cutting a perfectly healthy and normal body part off a defenceless baby, causing them significant pain, putting them at risk and altering their body forever is not moral. If you see it as moral then you're entitled to your opinion. I see it as disgusting and I'm not going to sit here and keep quiet.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Can’t believe we have pro “cut functional parts of your child’s body off without their consent” arguments "

You're confusing the argument.

The argument was about morals. Sadly for your "consent" argument, the legal frameworks accept it, and the moral Frameworks do too. Your reasoning is fail.

And functional? jeez it's just foreskin dude.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

The umbilical cord isn't alive "

By which definition? These are cells and they are as "alive" as any other.

The foreskin is just as "alive" until it's removed.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ottodot123Couple
over a year ago

Gillingham

[Removed by poster at 25/10/23 20:29:34]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *avexxMan
over a year ago

cheshire

half cut,,

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Really? I mean really. Hardly the same ball park. What about certain religious sects that suck the blood from the child's penis after circumcision? Does the unbiblical cord factor into that equation too? "

You know there are some people who eat the uterus? Not my cup of tea, but yeah.

No comment re sucking penis. That was kinda shocking when I found out.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rettyflamingoWoman
over a year ago

Where the flamboyance of flamingos live

No preference just as long as it works

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"That's absurd. By your argument if somebody sacrifices babies for religious reasons then it would be moral. Would you see it that way?

As you stated, different people have different moral standards. By my standards, cutting a perfectly healthy and normal body part off a defenceless baby, causing them significant pain, putting them at risk and altering their body forever is not moral. If you see it as moral then you're entitled to your opinion. I see it as disgusting and I'm not going to sit here and keep quiet. "

This isn't life or death. Also, the above is illegal and therefore societally unacceptable.

Look, one day the legal frameworks may change and your opinions will matter. Till then, it's something practised by many cultures, many religions (including Christians who saw Jesus as being born a Jew and therefore would've been "cut") and is legally acceptable in the majority of the world. You're welcome to protest and move to a country that practices what you preach.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Oh keep going this is amusing.

And they say women..."

I have too much time on my hands.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"half cut,,"

This is me on a Friday night.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ornucopiaMan
over a year ago

Bexley


"half cut,,

This is me on a Friday night."

Going ahead wit sex when a woman is half cut is not a wise thing to do.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ornucopiaMan
over a year ago

Bexley


"

Really? I mean really. Hardly the same ball park. What about certain religious sects that suck the blood from the child's penis after circumcision? Does the unbiblical cord factor into that equation too?

You know there are some people who eat the uterus? Not my cup of tea, but yeah.

No comment re sucking penis. That was kinda shocking when I found out."

Do you really mean the uterus, or the placenta?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Really? I mean really. Hardly the same ball park. What about certain religious sects that suck the blood from the child's penis after circumcision? Does the unbiblical cord factor into that equation too?

You know there are some people who eat the uterus? Not my cup of tea, but yeah.

No comment re sucking penis. That was kinda shocking when I found out.

Do you really mean the uterus, or the placenta?"

Oh f yeah my bad!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"half cut,,

This is me on a Friday night.

Going ahead wit sex when a woman is half cut is not a wise thing to do."

Who mentioned sex!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ndy27279Man
over a year ago

leeds

As a circumcised man (don’t really like to use the word cut)I read these posts with interest.until I was about 18 I realised I was in the minority in the uk as most of my pals weren’t circumcised and it did bother me.

however with age and experience I quickly realised that it doesn’t matter to most people.not really had any negative experiences from partners.my best mate who was circumcised a couple of years ago for medical reasons says he actually prefers it so I guess as long as it works does it really matter?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Cut

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orny-DJMan
over a year ago

Leigh-on-Sea


"I don't mind either but I do like cut.

I'm going to get shot for this aren't I."

Well, hello

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Really? I mean really. Hardly the same ball park. What about certain religious sects that suck the blood from the child's penis after circumcision? Does the unbiblical cord factor into that equation too?

You know there are some people who eat the uterus? Not my cup of tea, but yeah.

No comment re sucking penis. That was kinda shocking when I found out."

Eating the uterus?!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *partharmonyCouple
over a year ago

Ruislip


"That's absurd. By your argument if somebody sacrifices babies for religious reasons then it would be moral. Would you see it that way?

As you stated, different people have different moral standards. By my standards, cutting a perfectly healthy and normal body part off a defenceless baby, causing them significant pain, putting them at risk and altering their body forever is not moral. If you see it as moral then you're entitled to your opinion. I see it as disgusting and I'm not going to sit here and keep quiet.

This isn't life or death. Also, the above is illegal and therefore societally unacceptable.

"

But "socially acceptable" isn't what you said made circumcision moral. You said that doing it for religious reasons makes moral. I call bs on that. As I said, if you kill a baby in the name of religion it would be immoral even if some society considered it socially acceptable and it was legal. 9/11 was done for religious reasons. Was that moral?

I'm merely pointing out out that your argument that doing something for religious makes it moral is absurd, which it looks like you recognise because you then move the goalposts and say something is moral because it is socially acceptable. Are you now saying that anything that is socially acceptable is moral?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"That's absurd. By your argument if somebody sacrifices babies for religious reasons then it would be moral. Would you see it that way?

As you stated, different people have different moral standards. By my standards, cutting a perfectly healthy and normal body part off a defenceless baby, causing them significant pain, putting them at risk and altering their body forever is not moral. If you see it as moral then you're entitled to your opinion. I see it as disgusting and I'm not going to sit here and keep quiet.

This isn't life or death. Also, the above is illegal and therefore societally unacceptable.

But "socially acceptable" isn't what you said made circumcision moral. You said that doing it for religious reasons makes moral. I call bs on that. As I said, if you kill a baby in the name of religion it would be immoral even if some society considered it socially acceptable and it was legal. 9/11 was done for religious reasons. Was that moral?

I'm merely pointing out out that your argument that doing something for religious makes it moral is absurd, which it looks like you recognise because you then move the goalposts and say something is moral because it is socially acceptable. Are you now saying that anything that is socially acceptable is moral? "

I kinda don't care anymore, honestly. The arguments are moot. You're no different to a vegetarian who hates on meat eaters.

If you don't like the law of the land, then please find somewhere else to live.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icolerobbieCouple
over a year ago

walsall


"Cutting an umbilical chord at birth is not mutilation.

Permanently disfiguring a healthy set of genitals, male or female, in the name of religion, culture or any other bullshit reason is barbaric. Especially if it’s a young child who can’t make their own decision.

We've just established what moral means. You take to a different set of sliding scales and apply your own arbitrary values as you see fit, that's hardly moral.

Legally it's acceptable (in males). Morally for the majority, it's also acceptable. You're in a tiny minority who believe otherwise because your value systems are completely different.

You used the terminology "mutilation" instead of cutting. Do you know what that word actually means?

Here's the Internet again:

an act or instance of destroying, removing, or severely damaging a limb or other body part of a person or animal

Circumcised dicks work, they work rather well. Ergo they're not severely damaged or destroyed. If anything they work better than their non cut counterparts. There's statistically less incidence of disease, and they're more hygienic. Those are the facts on the ground.

Presumably unnecessary cesarian sections (tummy mutilations) are unacceptable in order to rip out a child from the "birth chamber" without it's consent?

You're ok with mutilating the umbilical cord.

You're ok with stabbing a child with a sharp object to administer medication?"

Nice bit of deflection and whatsboutery.

I don’t agree with mutilating children.

You think it’s fine. We don’t and won’t agree.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *J GeminiTV/TS
over a year ago

Northumberland

I am cut and love it . As for other guys, I do love them cut, but I do like to play with an uncut as I can test them more ,

Xx

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *J GeminiTV/TS
over a year ago

Northumberland

Tease them I mean, not test ,

Xx

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oghicksMan
over a year ago

Brackley


"

If you are cut and they prefer uncut, well kinda screwed there aren't you."

Or possibly not, depending on how rigidly they apply that preference?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ifty69Man
over a year ago

north tyneside

Uncut

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *teveanddebsCouple
over a year ago

Norwich

[Removed by poster at 27/10/23 10:32:47]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *teveanddebsCouple
over a year ago

Norwich


"

Here's the Internet again:

an act or instance of destroying, removing, or severely damaging a limb or other body part of a person or animal

"

Seems to cover circumcision

An act of removing a body part

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ornucopiaMan
over a year ago

Bexley


"

Here's the Internet again:

an act or instance of destroying, removing, or severely damaging a limb or other body part of a person or animal

Seems to cover circumcision

An act of removing a body part"

Should dentists be removing teeth?

Particularly for cosmetic reasons.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uttonboyMan
over a year ago

woking

I’m cut, and from my personal experience about 80% of the people I’ve been with couldn’t care one way or another.

20% have liked it, either because it’s a niche, it’s their first time with one, or they have an existing preference for it. It’s ranged from a quick mention, to a full on inquisitive fetish.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *he Dark SaintMan
over a year ago

hitchin

Just throwing in that there is some evidence showing medical benefits to circumcision. Not saying people should have one, it's choice and makes no difference in how you perform in the bedroom.

1.Less risk of urinary tract infections

2.A reduced risk of some sexually transmitted diseases in men

3.Protection against penile cancer and a lower risk of cervical cancer in female sex partners

4.Prevention of balanitis (inflammation of the glans) and balanoposthitis (inflammation of the glans and foreskin)

5 Prevention of phimosis (the inability to retract the foreskin) and paraphimosis (the inability to return the foreskin to its original location)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"That's absurd. By your argument if somebody sacrifices babies for religious reasons then it would be moral. Would you see it that way?

As you stated, different people have different moral standards. By my standards, cutting a perfectly healthy and normal body part off a defenceless baby, causing them significant pain, putting them at risk and altering their body forever is not moral. If you see it as moral then you're entitled to your opinion. I see it as disgusting and I'm not going to sit here and keep quiet.

This isn't life or death. Also, the above is illegal and therefore societally unacceptable.

But "socially acceptable" isn't what you said made circumcision moral. You said that doing it for religious reasons makes moral. I call bs on that. As I said, if you kill a baby in the name of religion it would be immoral even if some society considered it socially acceptable and it was legal. 9/11 was done for religious reasons. Was that moral?

I'm merely pointing out out that your argument that doing something for religious makes it moral is absurd, which it looks like you recognise because you then move the goalposts and say something is moral because it is socially acceptable. Are you now saying that anything that is socially acceptable is moral?

I kinda don't care anymore, honestly. The arguments are moot. You're no different to a vegetarian who hates on meat eaters.

If you don't like the law of the land, then please find somewhere else to live. "

I hope you keep that same energy when countries in the Middle East treat women like shit because it’s the law of the land

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lueDressWoman
over a year ago

Bath

I have only ever had uncut partners.And visually prefer that. Personal hygiene was immaculate.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Is this a thread of people arguing over foreskins?

I love the internet.

I reckon this is EXACTLY what it was created for.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aughty_Smooth_OperatorMan
over a year ago

Birmingham

I wounder if you could get it uncut again somehow is that possible

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Here's the Internet again:

an act or instance of destroying, removing, or severely damaging a limb or other body part of a person or animal

Seems to cover circumcision

An act of removing a body part"

You mean like cutting your nails? Guess you could call it finger mutilation. Weird though but... Err. Whatever floats your boat.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I hope you keep that same energy when countries in the Middle East treat women like shit because it’s the law of the land "

Want me to declare Godwin's Law now, or wait till you get there?

It's just foreskin. It's done for many reasons including religious, cultural and medical. It's an accepted practice by billions of people. There are loads of positives associated with it. And it's legal in the land of the free, the greatest of Britain's, the most United of Kingdoms.

You guys can keep talking Middle East, mutilation, morality, etc but ultimately you're living in a land that sanctions it. You're welcome to leave the land if you're that CUT UP about it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *teveanddebsCouple
over a year ago

Norwich


"

Here's the Internet again:

an act or instance of destroying, removing, or severely damaging a limb or other body part of a person or animal

Seems to cover circumcision

An act of removing a body part

Should dentists be removing teeth?

Particularly for cosmetic reasons. "

Thank was from the definition of mutilation, if people wish to have body modifications for cosmetic reasons then providing they are adults then no harm, no foul.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Is this a thread of people arguing over foreskins?

I love the internet.

I reckon this is EXACTLY what it was created for."

Tim Berners Lee pictured this.

It's about Nazis

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hunky ChefMan
over a year ago

Norwich

I'm halfway there and naturally.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I tear it with my teeth

Well you chose violence didn't you.

Oh hang on, something tells me we’re not talking about sellotape?"

I assumed you were talking about toast.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *allkinkynerdMan
over a year ago

Consett

I prefer uncut, but cut are usually cheaper so in this economy that's what I go for.

We're talking about loaves right? Guys? Right?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Cut

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iltsTSgirlTV/TS
over a year ago

chichester

cut looks great but not really a deal breaker

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Never seen a cut one in the flesh

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *obilebottomMan
over a year ago

All over

I ask them to slice it thick at the bakers.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ornucopiaMan
over a year ago

Bexley


"I ask them to slice it thick at the bakers. "

It is widely held (like some cocks)That nobody misses a slice off a cut loaf.

I find that hard to believe in a situation when there are not many slices left.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

What si u mesn no slices left lil

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ond Jimmy BondMan
over a year ago

London

I presume there’s not much on tv today

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lex CoxMan
over a year ago

Porth

Uncut fairly loose foreskin and always clean.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I don't have a preference as long as it is well looked after "

Mine's had plenty of careful lady owners

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Like all body parts, we prefer them without bits cut off them. Do you prefer ears with the lobes cut off? Do you prefer feet with a toe missing? Why would you prefer a penis with the foreskin cut off it? It's supposed to be there. If it has to be taken off for medical reasons then that's unfortunate, but how this becomes a preference baffles me. "
Baffles me too,but each to their own.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aulhornyladMan
over a year ago

Sunderland

I'm fully circumcised but like uncut

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ylonseeker2023Man
over a year ago

Harwich

Brown bread. Always a cut/sliced loaf.

Marmalade. Coarse cut orange.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ornucopiaMan
over a year ago

Bexley

I wonder whether there has ever been a pub called 'The Four Skinners'?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uffolkcouple-bi onlyCouple
over a year ago

West Suffolk/Essex

Uncut

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ndy man 200Man
over a year ago

hereford

Im uncut

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ifty69Man
over a year ago

north tyneside

[Removed by poster at 05/11/23 09:39:43]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ifty69Man
over a year ago

north tyneside

Uncut and it’s fine, sometimes a bit tight but makes it more intense

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eren4891Woman
over a year ago

North east wales

Uncut please..

Not no really long foreskins

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *a LunaWoman
over a year ago

South Wales

No preference. I don’t look at them, I sit on them.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orkshirecutcockMan
over a year ago

blackburn

I prefer the look of mine cut always get stuff if I wear boxers though

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Wow

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ungBlackTopMan
over a year ago

salford

cut always reminds me of a rocket, they look lonely and cold. UC looks ready for action and nicer looking but those half n half are disgusting....get it cut.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arrie69Man
over a year ago

Dublin

Uncut and goes back nice and easy. Never had any complaints

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top