Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"To be fair, the person you messaged had clearly stated no single men, whoch you chose to ignore - not that that justifies an abusive reply" Fair, I did ignore the single men part.. bit it did state also no 'lonely' single men. this being said.. thats not what i was requesting feedback on. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just for clarity, not all single men are lonely or sad, I'm happily single by choice " This was what i was asking about, I was just putting it into context so that people understood. Yes i should have probably just ignored them in general, but as it said 'lonely' single guys, I had to test the waters lol | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not sure how I'd interpret "no lonely (demographic that describes me)" but it's a bit of a shitty way to try to filter someone out. I wouldn't put it on my profile." So you would say that any single guy on here could be, but isn't necessarily lonely? Would you if not wanting the attention as such from single guys, just use the filters? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If they don’t want single men to message then surely just put message filters on and then they wouldn’t need to write that on their profile as the wouldn’t get any messages from them. Simple? " That's the logical thing to do I would have assumed. Even I have filters on. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not sure how I'd interpret "no lonely (demographic that describes me)" but it's a bit of a shitty way to try to filter someone out. I wouldn't put it on my profile. So you would say that any single guy on here could be, but isn't necessarily lonely? Would you if not wanting the attention as such from single guys, just use the filters? " If I didn't want attention from guys, I'd have my filters up to stop them messaging me. I don't think "lonely single guys" is an effective criteria - I don't know who is or isn't, or if their judgement would be the same as mine. It's just a requirement that'd cause agro. Don't have time for it. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We used to allow single guys to message but blocked after being inundated with messages and ultimately all/ most married timewasters. We contact single guys we fancy but almost without exception all let us down. Our experience isn't isolated talking to others. While I'm not saying you're in that category the vast majority of profiles are single guys who ruin it for the good ones. Even in clubs the single guys are quite predatory so we avoid nights they are allowed to attend. It's tough being a single guy and they often deliver abuse when told no. I'm aware of a guy who was d*unk when some friends of ours turned up for a meet, refused him and walked away and ever since he's been causing problems for the couple. I'm sure that's not an isolated incident so whilst we'd not be unpleasant with anyone, it's probably easy to see why single guys have such a hard time here. My estimation is that 80 % of the single males are in relationships looking for a bit on the side. Sorry if it sounds like a broad brush but when we've repeatedly made a commitment then get let down, we don't try any more. " I completely get that, and it does suck that there some out there that spoil it for the genuine ones. The fact that a lot of single guys are looking for a bit on the side is a bit shit really (unless that's the dynamic of things, but that should be mentioned as what they are doing). Would you say though that all guys on here can be classified as Sad Lonely Single Guys? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What if they’re lonely but not single? Asking for a friend obvs. " Best advice is to get single haha to many people who stay in a relationships for no reason but perhaps their own | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Did you honestly see 'lonely' as the salient descriptor in that sentence (ie above 'single men')? It does sound like you did. Filters are the only way for some people. If people need to phrase it in such a way they may as well use them. Or don't be so silly and add needless terms that (somehow, it might seem) can confuse. 'No single men' is all you need to say really. pt" As i said in a reply earlier.. I did read it all but didn't think i fit in the 'Lonely' category so decided to test the waters. but again, this isn't what i was looking at.. Agreed they may as well just use filters as this would stop the single men issue. The question was though.. Do you thing all single guys on here are (referring to the abuse recieved more than the bio) 'Sad Lonely Single Men'? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Everyone sees things differently. You'd think if they thought all single guys were sad then they'd just up the filters and block them out. But hey." Good point well made | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"To be fair, the person you messaged had clearly stated no single men, whoch you chose to ignore - not that that justifies an abusive reply" This | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We used to allow single guys to message but blocked after being inundated with messages and ultimately all/ most married timewasters. We contact single guys we fancy but almost without exception all let us down. Our experience isn't isolated talking to others. While I'm not saying you're in that category the vast majority of profiles are single guys who ruin it for the good ones. Even in clubs the single guys are quite predatory so we avoid nights they are allowed to attend. It's tough being a single guy and they often deliver abuse when told no. I'm aware of a guy who was d*unk when some friends of ours turned up for a meet, refused him and walked away and ever since he's been causing problems for the couple. I'm sure that's not an isolated incident so whilst we'd not be unpleasant with anyone, it's probably easy to see why single guys have such a hard time here. My estimation is that 80 % of the single males are in relationships looking for a bit on the side. Sorry if it sounds like a broad brush but when we've repeatedly made a commitment then get let down, we don't try any more. I completely get that, and it does suck that there some out there that spoil it for the genuine ones. The fact that a lot of single guys are looking for a bit on the side is a bit shit really (unless that's the dynamic of things, but that should be mentioned as what they are doing). Would you say though that all guys on here can be classified as Sad Lonely Single Guys?" A bit on the side sounds like a starter, I've come for a full course meal and desert | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We used to allow single guys to message but blocked after being inundated with messages and ultimately all/ most married timewasters. We contact single guys we fancy but almost without exception all let us down. Our experience isn't isolated talking to others. While I'm not saying you're in that category the vast majority of profiles are single guys who ruin it for the good ones. Even in clubs the single guys are quite predatory so we avoid nights they are allowed to attend. It's tough being a single guy and they often deliver abuse when told no. I'm aware of a guy who was d*unk when some friends of ours turned up for a meet, refused him and walked away and ever since he's been causing problems for the couple. I'm sure that's not an isolated incident so whilst we'd not be unpleasant with anyone, it's probably easy to see why single guys have such a hard time here. My estimation is that 80 % of the single males are in relationships looking for a bit on the side. Sorry if it sounds like a broad brush but when we've repeatedly made a commitment then get let down, we don't try any more. I completely get that, and it does suck that there some out there that spoil it for the genuine ones. The fact that a lot of single guys are looking for a bit on the side is a bit shit really (unless that's the dynamic of things, but that should be mentioned as what they are doing). Would you say though that all guys on here can be classified as Sad Lonely Single Guys?" careful now no need to tar all with same brush. Channel 5..how to be a swinger.. On now. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Did you honestly see 'lonely' as the salient descriptor in that sentence (ie above 'single men')? It does sound like you did. Filters are the only way for some people. If people need to phrase it in such a way they may as well use them. Or don't be so silly and add needless terms that (somehow, it might seem) can confuse. 'No single men' is all you need to say really. pt As i said in a reply earlier.. I did read it all but didn't think i fit in the 'Lonely' category so decided to test the waters. but again, this isn't what i was looking at.. Agreed they may as well just use filters as this would stop the single men issue. The question was though.. Do you thing all single guys on here are (referring to the abuse recieved more than the bio) 'Sad Lonely Single Men'? " . No of course not, they are just leaving their shit for passers by to step in. I wish so many wouldn't do that but they do. tbh though contacting them anyway isn't going to help as they probably do it due to getting so many unwanted speculative messages anyway. People just don't want the admin, but it's par for the course on here it's just he way it is. pt | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sending off a message to another user today and the users Bio stated no lonely single men. Now i dont figure myself as a 'lonely' single guy, but I got abuse back (yes reported) as apparently i'm a 'SAD lonely single guy' cause if i'm on here. Now I question you all.. Does being on here as a single guy interpret the same way to everyone else here? Obviously it's opinion based, I'm just curious... Thanks all" No single guys means no single guys op. Regardless of sad or lonely beside.. No not all single guys are sad nor lonely. Pretty much diverse. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sending off a message to another user today and the users Bio stated no lonely single men. Now i dont figure myself as a 'lonely' single guy, but I got abuse back (yes reported) as apparently i'm a 'SAD lonely single guy' cause if i'm on here. Now I question you all.. Does being on here as a single guy interpret the same way to everyone else here? Obviously it's opinion based, I'm just curious... Thanks all" We think single guys would have more luck using dating apps for hookups than fab. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Can you be in a couple and feel lonely? Being lonely isn't intrinsic to being single, so I'd say they've left themselves open to that confusion. If they think all single men are lonely. Just put no single men? I'd have taken that as a sign they were 'not my type' to begin with. " You can feel lonely even surrounded by lots of people you love. Loneliness isn't just for the singles. Mrs | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Did you honestly see 'lonely' as the salient descriptor in that sentence (ie above 'single men')? It does sound like you did. Filters are the only way for some people. If people need to phrase it in such a way they may as well use them. Or don't be so silly and add needless terms that (somehow, it might seem) can confuse. 'No single men' is all you need to say really. pt As i said in a reply earlier.. I did read it all but didn't think i fit in the 'Lonely' category so decided to test the waters. but again, this isn't what i was looking at.. Agreed they may as well just use filters as this would stop the single men issue. The question was though.. Do you thing all single guys on here are (referring to the abuse recieved more than the bio) 'Sad Lonely Single Men'?" Yes the way they have written it is not clear. I might have messaged to ask if generally happy but lonely single men are fine or sad but not lonely single men just for the giggles If the intention was to say all single men here are sad and lonely then they are the sad ones.. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If they don’t want single men to message then surely just put message filters on and then they wouldn’t need to write that on their profile as the wouldn’t get any messages from them. Simple? " This is a fair enough comment, however, not everyone is aware that you can do this - just look at how many threads are started by men complaining about all the men that message them despite their profile clearly stating thst they are straight? Or those that complain about people not messaging back with a 'no thanks' despite that particular issue being covered in site FAQs? Or perhaps those that take to the forums posting the entire contents of a private message between themselves and someone they've had problems with despite it being against site rules. Some of us take the trouble to familiarise with the features and rules of the site whereas a lot of others don't. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |