Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We see it as people who are willing to meet from a wide age range. Probably nobody is really going to meet someone of 96 or 97 though " Exactly this! It's more about attraction rather than being hung up on age! There are some very attractive people in the higher end of the age bracket | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We see it as people not being hung up on age. " I get that.. however my last two friends requests have been sent by a 19 year old and a 22 year old, both females who live over a hundred miles away..as flattered as I am I still see red flags...am I overthinking .. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We see it as people not being hung up on age. I get that.. however my last two friends requests have been sent by a 19 year old and a 22 year old, both females who live over a hundred miles away..as flattered as I am I still see red flags...am I overthinking .." No I don't believe you are | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As age seems to be a popular topic this morning...how do people feel about a profile that says willing to meet 18 - 99...? Do you consider it to be a lack of effort or a red flag ??...? " Some people think age is just a number, others are insecure, don’t let it effect your choices | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We see it as people not being hung up on age. I get that.. however my last two friends requests have been sent by a 19 year old and a 22 year old, both females who live over a hundred miles away..as flattered as I am I still see red flags...am I overthinking .." Yes. You probably are. It's unlikely that those women are serious about meeting up. Much too young for me but also important to bear in mind that noone on here is quite what they seem or claim to be. Apart from me, of course... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We see it as people not being hung up on age. I get that.. however my last two friends requests have been sent by a 19 year old and a 22 year old, both females who live over a hundred miles away..as flattered as I am I still see red flags...am I overthinking .. Yes. You probably are. It's unlikely that those women are serious about meeting up. Much too young for me but also important to bear in mind that noone on here is quite what they seem or claim to be. Apart from me, of course..." . That is so true. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I have mixed feelings about as it can depend upon the rest of the profile generally, if the person has put effort into writing their profile then I would say they are either inclusive or don't care about age, if the profile is basically blank then they really don't care because they are looking for anything they can get or are lazy and don't think a profile matters But that's just me " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I dont think anything of it. How it equates to lazy or a red flag, I do not know. I think id maybe need to look at my own thinking if something as simple as leaving a default setting in place got my guard up." I was just about to say the exact same thing. I leave my age range at 18-99 so it excludes nobody from messaging me. How does that make me lazy, equate to me making no effort (given the rest of my profile), or put up a red flag? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I dont think anything of it. How it equates to lazy or a red flag, I do not know. I think id maybe need to look at my own thinking if something as simple as leaving a default setting in place got my guard up." To clarify..both the profiles were very short on detail...I promise I won't let it spoil my day.. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There's lovely people of all ages on here, doesn't matter how old they are." There are and if this was a site that people used for socialising only we'd have our age range set at 18 to 99. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There's lovely people of all ages on here, doesn't matter how old they are. There are and if this was a site that people used for socialising only we'd have our age range set at 18 to 99. " We could be friends! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We see it as people who are willing to meet from a wide age range. Probably nobody is really going to meet someone of 96 or 97 though " It makes you wonder if there is one though at that age. It is a fascinating world | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There's lovely people of all ages on here, doesn't matter how old they are. There are and if this was a site that people used for socialising only we'd have our age range set at 18 to 99. We could be friends! " We could | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We see it as people who are willing to meet from a wide age range. Probably nobody is really going to meet someone of 96 or 97 though It makes you wonder if there is one though at that age. It is a fascinating world " I think if there isn't already there will be soon. People are living longer and the desire for close contact with other humans never goes away even though it seems widely assumed that it does | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We see it as people who are willing to meet from a wide age range. Probably nobody is really going to meet someone of 96 or 97 though It makes you wonder if there is one though at that age. It is a fascinating world I think if there isn't already there will be soon. People are living longer and the desire for close contact with other humans never goes away even though it seems widely assumed that it does" I am sure you are right. And why not indeed | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I dont think anything of it. How it equates to lazy or a red flag, I do not know. I think id maybe need to look at my own thinking if something as simple as leaving a default setting in place got my guard up. To clarify..both the profiles were very short on detail...I promise I won't let it spoil my day.. " I'm not sure why you would let it spoil your day.... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There's lovely people of all ages on here, doesn't matter how old they are. There are and if this was a site that people used for socialising only we'd have our age range set at 18 to 99. We could be friends! We could " When you go to that Italian place again! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We see it as people who are willing to meet from a wide age range. Probably nobody is really going to meet someone of 96 or 97 though It makes you wonder if there is one though at that age. It is a fascinating world I think if there isn't already there will be soon. People are living longer and the desire for close contact with other humans never goes away even though it seems widely assumed that it does I am sure you are right. And why not indeed " I think the main barrier for very elderly people currently is lack of ability to use the internet. I'm not sure if my dad (96) would use fab but he did express an interest in 'getting a woman off the internet'. He does use the net but only for basic things like banking and Facebook messenger etc. I dread to think of him let loose on a dating site | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There's lovely people of all ages on here, doesn't matter how old they are. There are and if this was a site that people used for socialising only we'd have our age range set at 18 to 99. We could be friends! We could When you go to that Italian place again! " Oh! You remember that? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There's lovely people of all ages on here, doesn't matter how old they are. There are and if this was a site that people used for socialising only we'd have our age range set at 18 to 99. We could be friends! We could When you go to that Italian place again! Oh! You remember that? " I have an annoying memory. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There's lovely people of all ages on here, doesn't matter how old they are. There are and if this was a site that people used for socialising only we'd have our age range set at 18 to 99. We could be friends! We could When you go to that Italian place again! Oh! You remember that? I have an annoying memory. " Me too. . This place is very far from cool. Probably why we fit in | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We see it as people who are willing to meet from a wide age range. Probably nobody is really going to meet someone of 96 or 97 though " Hang around I will let you know | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As age seems to be a popular topic this morning...how do people feel about a profile that says willing to meet 18 - 99...? Do you consider it to be a lack of effort or a red flag ??...? " Their very inclusive and not ageist | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We see it as people who are willing to meet from a wide age range. Probably nobody is really going to meet someone of 96 or 97 though Hang around I will let you know " we're not far behind | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As age seems to be a popular topic this morning...how do people feel about a profile that says willing to meet 18 - 99...? Do you consider it to be a lack of effort or a red flag ??...? " To queue Connor mcgregor “I couldn’t give a f&@k” | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why is it a red flag? Yeah 99 is a bit ridiculous, but if someone has a nicely written, active and photo'd profile, why would be casting a wide net be an issue? " Wait, what? So no one 98-99 on here... damn it! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I said both as I see it this way. You fill in the forms for your details for your profile and it's just another part of the form, I get that leaving it at 18-99 allows the inbox to be wide open and that's the individuals choice, but (I will get a bashing) realistically, it could be changed to 98, 97, 96 etc to show its at least been looked at" Or it could be thought that 98, 97, 96 etc. means they will actually meet people of those ages. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why is it a red flag? Yeah 99 is a bit ridiculous, but if someone has a nicely written, active and photo'd profile, why would be casting a wide net be an issue? Wait, what? So no one 98-99 on here... damn it! " I look it today if that interests you | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I said both as I see it this way. You fill in the forms for your details for your profile and it's just another part of the form, I get that leaving it at 18-99 allows the inbox to be wide open and that's the individuals choice, but (I will get a bashing) realistically, it could be changed to 98, 97, 96 etc to show its at least been looked at Or it could be thought that 98, 97, 96 etc. means they will actually meet people of those ages. " I've just done a 1500 mile search of profiles aged between 90 to 99 and the majority are wind ups, fakes but interestingly, couples that have the incorrect age for themselves and clearly are using the site to have lots of fun, is that the magic answer lol falsify ages to have double the fun | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I have received replies to some of my messages telling me that I am far too old for them, I check their profile and lo and behold they seek people between 18 - 99. I am only 83 so well inside their age parameters. " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why is it a red flag? Yeah 99 is a bit ridiculous, but if someone has a nicely written, active and photo'd profile, why would be casting a wide net be an issue? Wait, what? So no one 98-99 on here... damn it! I look it today if that interests you " Haha you might be called on to prove that | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s depends on the person and if I’m attracted to them. The only “18”year olds on here that have messaged me have been scammers. " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I said both as I see it this way. You fill in the forms for your details for your profile and it's just another part of the form, I get that leaving it at 18-99 allows the inbox to be wide open and that's the individuals choice, but (I will get a bashing) realistically, it could be changed to 98, 97, 96 etc to show its at least been looked at" Okay, you've convinced me to set age filters. My reasoning before was similar to some others mentioned here, the rest of my profile is clearly filled out so it's not like I didn't even look at the age filter. Realistically, I'm not going to be receiving messages but mostly initiating myself, so the range didn't matter anyway. Plus, I started off with a Bayesian approach - better to have a wider range lest I offend someone I'm attracted to by excluding their age! Now, with more data, I can narrow the range | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why is it a red flag? Yeah 99 is a bit ridiculous, but if someone has a nicely written, active and photo'd profile, why would be casting a wide net be an issue? " It's a red flag if a man in his 40s is into 18 year olds. For me anyway. (And vice versa for older women/very young men). And "wide net" can be interpreted as just being indiscriminate. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I said both as I see it this way. You fill in the forms for your details for your profile and it's just another part of the form, I get that leaving it at 18-99 allows the inbox to be wide open and that's the individuals choice, but (I will get a bashing) realistically, it could be changed to 98, 97, 96 etc to show its at least been looked at Okay, you've convinced me to set age filters. My reasoning before was similar to some others mentioned here, the rest of my profile is clearly filled out so it's not like I didn't even look at the age filter. Realistically, I'm not going to be receiving messages but mostly initiating myself, so the range didn't matter anyway. Plus, I started off with a Bayesian approach - better to have a wider range lest I offend someone I'm attracted to by excluding their age! Now, with more data, I can narrow the range " All about the data | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I said both as I see it this way. You fill in the forms for your details for your profile and it's just another part of the form, I get that leaving it at 18-99 allows the inbox to be wide open and that's the individuals choice, but (I will get a bashing) realistically, it could be changed to 98, 97, 96 etc to show its at least been looked at Okay, you've convinced me to set age filters. My reasoning before was similar to some others mentioned here, the rest of my profile is clearly filled out so it's not like I didn't even look at the age filter. Realistically, I'm not going to be receiving messages but mostly initiating myself, so the range didn't matter anyway. Plus, I started off with a Bayesian approach - better to have a wider range lest I offend someone I'm attracted to by excluding their age! Now, with more data, I can narrow the range All about the data " In Meghan's voice: Because you know I'm all about that data, that data, no guesses | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I always used to leave my ages wide open simply because I will chat to any age. Chatting is not meeting." You're right it's not but we learned quite quickly that a lot of people thought if we chatted we would meet them for sex. It became easier to limit our age range and who we spoke to. Its a shame because we genuinely hoped to make friends alongside the sex bit | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I said both as I see it this way. You fill in the forms for your details for your profile and it's just another part of the form, I get that leaving it at 18-99 allows the inbox to be wide open and that's the individuals choice, but (I will get a bashing) realistically, it could be changed to 98, 97, 96 etc to show its at least been looked at Okay, you've convinced me to set age filters. My reasoning before was similar to some others mentioned here, the rest of my profile is clearly filled out so it's not like I didn't even look at the age filter. Realistically, I'm not going to be receiving messages but mostly initiating myself, so the range didn't matter anyway. Plus, I started off with a Bayesian approach - better to have a wider range lest I offend someone I'm attracted to by excluding their age! Now, with more data, I can narrow the range All about the data In Meghan's voice: Because you know I'm all about that data, that data, no guesses " Are you singing it? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I said both as I see it this way. You fill in the forms for your details for your profile and it's just another part of the form, I get that leaving it at 18-99 allows the inbox to be wide open and that's the individuals choice, but (I will get a bashing) realistically, it could be changed to 98, 97, 96 etc to show its at least been looked at Okay, you've convinced me to set age filters. My reasoning before was similar to some others mentioned here, the rest of my profile is clearly filled out so it's not like I didn't even look at the age filter. Realistically, I'm not going to be receiving messages but mostly initiating myself, so the range didn't matter anyway. Plus, I started off with a Bayesian approach - better to have a wider range lest I offend someone I'm attracted to by excluding their age! Now, with more data, I can narrow the range All about the data In Meghan's voice: Because you know I'm all about that data, that data, no guesses Are you singing it? " I did in my mind, yes. Just to see if it'd rhyme - pretty good if I may say so myself. Don't have her vocal range to try it aloud (so I'm listening to it instead)! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I always used to leave my ages wide open simply because I will chat to any age. Chatting is not meeting. You're right it's not but we learned quite quickly that a lot of people thought if we chatted we would meet them for sex. It became easier to limit our age range and who we spoke to. Its a shame because we genuinely hoped to make friends alongside the sex bit" Different dynamic maybe as you're a couple? As a man on fab my messages aren't unmanageale. Real world, I am more often approached by younger women than my own age too. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I said both as I see it this way. You fill in the forms for your details for your profile and it's just another part of the form, I get that leaving it at 18-99 allows the inbox to be wide open and that's the individuals choice, but (I will get a bashing) realistically, it could be changed to 98, 97, 96 etc to show its at least been looked at Okay, you've convinced me to set age filters. My reasoning before was similar to some others mentioned here, the rest of my profile is clearly filled out so it's not like I didn't even look at the age filter. Realistically, I'm not going to be receiving messages but mostly initiating myself, so the range didn't matter anyway. Plus, I started off with a Bayesian approach - better to have a wider range lest I offend someone I'm attracted to by excluding their age! Now, with more data, I can narrow the range All about the data In Meghan's voice: Because you know I'm all about that data, that data, no guesses Are you singing it? I did in my mind, yes. Just to see if it'd rhyme - pretty good if I may say so myself. Don't have her vocal range to try it aloud (so I'm listening to it instead)! " She has vocal range? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I said both as I see it this way. You fill in the forms for your details for your profile and it's just another part of the form, I get that leaving it at 18-99 allows the inbox to be wide open and that's the individuals choice, but (I will get a bashing) realistically, it could be changed to 98, 97, 96 etc to show its at least been looked at Okay, you've convinced me to set age filters. My reasoning before was similar to some others mentioned here, the rest of my profile is clearly filled out so it's not like I didn't even look at the age filter. Realistically, I'm not going to be receiving messages but mostly initiating myself, so the range didn't matter anyway. Plus, I started off with a Bayesian approach - better to have a wider range lest I offend someone I'm attracted to by excluding their age! Now, with more data, I can narrow the range All about the data In Meghan's voice: Because you know I'm all about that data, that data, no guesses Are you singing it? I did in my mind, yes. Just to see if it'd rhyme - pretty good if I may say so myself. Don't have her vocal range to try it aloud (so I'm listening to it instead)! She has vocal range? " Don't you think so? Not a fan I'm assuming lol | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |