FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Stretched too thin

Jump to newest
 

By *electableicecream OP   Man
over a year ago

The West

How many concurrent correspondences can you keep up with it before you start to feel a bit stretched and simply can't engage with everyone even though you would like to.

How do you prioritise ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *reyToTheFairiesWoman
over a year ago

Carlisle usually

I think of it as polysaturated.

Everyone is different. People need different amounts and kinds of attention at different points.

I can manage 3 amazing connections apparently. I thought 2 would be my limit. Then there's more casual ones dotted about as well.

But everyone is different.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ansoffateMan
over a year ago

Sagittarius A

I got to 8 and then had an ADHD overload and hit reset.

I'd say it depends on the quality. 1-3 has been my ideal historically.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ornucopiaMan
over a year ago

Bexley

I assumed this was going to be about condoms!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I assumed this was going to be about condoms!"

I was thinking pizza bases

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I can get quite hyper for a while chatting to multiple men on different platforms. Over lockdown it was regularly half a dozen or more and there have been times since. I text very fast. But I don't like myself much when I'm doing that, so I don't anymore. I'd prefer just one very good chat.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"How many concurrent correspondences can you keep up with it before you start to feel a bit stretched and simply can't engage with everyone even though you would like to.

How do you prioritise ?

"

Work or fab or friends?

Work? Easy, we barely speak.

Friends - easy, I don’t have many.

Fab - not as easy. Although not talking to many, if I want to reply properly, I need to sit and type it properly and try not to fuck yo soelli g and grammar as I normally type one handed.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"How many concurrent correspondences can you keep up with it before you start to feel a bit stretched and simply can't engage with everyone even though you would like to.

How do you prioritise ?

Work or fab or friends?

Work? Easy, we barely speak.

Friends - easy, I don’t have many.

Fab - not as easy. Although not talking to many, if I want to reply properly, I need to sit and type it properly and try not to fuck yo soelli g and grammar as I normally type one handed. "

One handed? Not with both thumbs?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

East Sussex

Three probably.

Family will always come first in this order

Mr N

Children

Dad

Then friends

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *electableicecream OP   Man
over a year ago

The West

I should have specified that I mean on fab or dating apps.

I can enjoy two intense hot chats at the same time but anymore and the intellectual effort dampens the hotness and I don't the bandwidth.

Getting to know people for meets I've found about three is enough to be able to take really read, retain and respond sincerely.

I do like a sprinkling of longer term correspondences that play out over months rather than hours or days. People I know I'm going to meet but not when.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

East Sussex

On fab for a get to know you kind of thing, two is probably our maximum.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *ornucopiaMan
over a year ago

Bexley


"I assumed this was going to be about condoms!

I was thinking pizza bases "

What would I know about pizza?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top