Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The number of guys (not all guys and I'm sorry to the ones who don't) for yet another guy thread but..... I've notice there seems to be an increase in guys who just can't/won't accept no for an answer. If they can't in a message, I dread to think what they would be like in person. Rant over " This is one of the reasons we blocked single guys up until recently. One got very abusive to the words no thank you. Others just would not let up after we said not for us sorry. I hate blocking anyone but the amount if guys we blocked who just would not accept no was verging on the rediculous. As you said sparkle if they cannot accept no in a message it could end up getting very risky for a single lady in a meet with them. Joanne. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The elusive fear of being rejected Take it on the chin Move on.. No means exactly this " Rejection is a daily event here. Man up boys and just accept it | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Whether or not they can't accept it makes no difference to the outcome. Say no thanks to them and then never message them again. That's it, conversation over. They might continue to send you messages at which point you can block them. In my experience everyone I've ever politely declined has been very accepting and understanding... though the occasional one might try asking "why"... but if I'm not responding it really doesn't matter what they say. " My main point of the post was how they would be during a meet if that's how they behave online x | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The number of guys (not all guys and I'm sorry to the ones who don't) for yet another guy thread but..... I've notice there seems to be an increase in guys who just can't/won't accept no for an answer. If they can't in a message, I dread to think what they would be like in person. Rant over " It coincides with the amount of threads making guys feel like shot when we shouldn’t feel like shit. It’s not my fault assholes exist. And you know what, some still are assholes, and let’s all agree, there will be some as lot of assholes in the future. But just ignore the fuckers. And they’ll go away, and hopefully find each other. Op, you’ve been around for a while, you should know this by now. *Woody is not in the mood for another man bashing thread. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"Some guys can’t do grammar. " You're a shit shot | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The number of guys (not all guys and I'm sorry to the ones who don't) for yet another guy thread but..... I've notice there seems to be an increase in guys who just can't/won't accept no for an answer. If they can't in a message, I dread to think what they would be like in person. Rant over It coincides with the amount of threads making guys feel like shot when we shouldn’t feel like shit. It’s not my fault assholes exist. And you know what, some still are assholes, and let’s all agree, there will be some as lot of assholes in the future. But just ignore the fuckers. And they’ll go away, and hopefully find each other. Op, you’ve been around for a while, you should know this by now. *Woody is not in the mood for another man bashing thread. " Hence why I apologised to the ones who don't x | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Whether or not they can't accept it makes no difference to the outcome. Say no thanks to them and then never message them again. That's it, conversation over. They might continue to send you messages at which point you can block them. In my experience everyone I've ever politely declined has been very accepting and understanding... though the occasional one might try asking "why"... but if I'm not responding it really doesn't matter what they say. My main point of the post was how they would be during a meet if that's how they behave online x" Probably quite happy they finally got a meet Then probably a total wanker (or worse) when it doesn't go their way. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The number of guys (not all guys and I'm sorry to the ones who don't) for yet another guy thread but..... I've notice there seems to be an increase in guys who just can't/won't accept no for an answer. If they can't in a message, I dread to think what they would be like in person. Rant over It coincides with the amount of threads making guys feel like shot when we shouldn’t feel like shit. It’s not my fault assholes exist. And you know what, some still are assholes, and let’s all agree, there will be some as lot of assholes in the future. But just ignore the fuckers. And they’ll go away, and hopefully find each other. Op, you’ve been around for a while, you should know this by now. *Woody is not in the mood for another man bashing thread. " Which other men bashing threads are there? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The number of guys (not all guys and I'm sorry to the ones who don't) for yet another guy thread but..... I've notice there seems to be an increase in guys who just can't/won't accept no for an answer. If they can't in a message, I dread to think what they would be like in person. Rant over " Another thing I don’t understand here that I read often . It’s not attractive not taking no for an answer . I’m always polite if I’m not a fit for someone and that’s that | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Whether or not they can't accept it makes no difference to the outcome. Say no thanks to them and then never message them again. That's it, conversation over. They might continue to send you messages at which point you can block them. In my experience everyone I've ever politely declined has been very accepting and understanding... though the occasional one might try asking "why"... but if I'm not responding it really doesn't matter what they say. My main point of the post was how they would be during a meet if that's how they behave online x" ,,, i would imagine they would be pushy maybe a little aggressive who knows pretty dam scary for a lady,, | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The number of guys (not all guys and I'm sorry to the ones who don't) for yet another guy thread but..... I've notice there seems to be an increase in guys who just can't/won't accept no for an answer. If they can't in a message, I dread to think what they would be like in person. Rant over " But if someone says yes then you get a different person? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Whether or not they can't accept it makes no difference to the outcome. Say no thanks to them and then never message them again. That's it, conversation over. They might continue to send you messages at which point you can block them. In my experience everyone I've ever politely declined has been very accepting and understanding... though the occasional one might try asking "why"... but if I'm not responding it really doesn't matter what they say. My main point of the post was how they would be during a meet if that's how they behave online x" Ok so if that's how they act online then surely that's where it starts and ends. There's no purpose in hypothesising about a potentially dangerous situation that you have already seen would have been unwise in going ahead with. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yes, I've noticed many still haven't accepted no after the umpteenth message. " Why do you allow them to keep pestering? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Grace and manners dictate that rejection should be handled like a gentleman not an uncouth youth " I think the term is 'with grace' I used that term with family the other day. Didn't think about it until the Rush album. But it applies to So much. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"They get one chance to come back then I block them. " Agree - and I report if they swear at me, abuse me or post nasty status updates after a polite no. Moderates do seem to kick them off tbh! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The number of guys (not all guys and I'm sorry to the ones who don't) for yet another guy thread but..... I've notice there seems to be an increase in guys who just can't/won't accept no for an answer. If they can't in a message, I dread to think what they would be like in person. Rant over " My block list is rapidly growing. I feel exactly the same. Not accepting a polite no thank you or acknowledging your reasons or not have a social. I'm not putting myself into j that situation in real life. Concerns me. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Depends if your playing yes means no and no means yes game " What's that now? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The number of guys (not all guys and I'm sorry to the ones who don't) for yet another guy thread but..... I've notice there seems to be an increase in guys who just can't/won't accept no for an answer. If they can't in a message, I dread to think what they would be like in person. Rant over " I just reply there's no way I would risk someone who can't take "no" for an answer as they are likely to be dangerous on a meet. Some don't really think about what they're doing and so apologise when it's spelled out to them. Some just prove how risky a meet with them would be. Saves me wasting any time on them. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Whether or not they can't accept it makes no difference to the outcome. Say no thanks to them and then never message them again. That's it, conversation over. They might continue to send you messages at which point you can block them. In my experience everyone I've ever politely declined has been very accepting and understanding... though the occasional one might try asking "why"... but if I'm not responding it really doesn't matter what they say. My main point of the post was how they would be during a meet if that's how they behave online x" I dread to think... I had this recently with a guy I went on a social with. All fine, then tried inviting himself round, I said no, he didn't understand why I didn't want him to pop round at 8am when I had plans for lunch... just didn't have any respect for my other commitments/schedule, told me he wasn't trying to be pushy, then persisted offering lunch, a spa day etc etc. So I asked him what he was going to teach his daughter about setting boundaries and men who can't take no for an answer. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Whether or not they can't accept it makes no difference to the outcome. Say no thanks to them and then never message them again. That's it, conversation over. They might continue to send you messages at which point you can block them. In my experience everyone I've ever politely declined has been very accepting and understanding... though the occasional one might try asking "why"... but if I'm not responding it really doesn't matter what they say. My main point of the post was how they would be during a meet if that's how they behave online x I dread to think... I had this recently with a guy I went on a social with. All fine, then tried inviting himself round, I said no, he didn't understand why I didn't want him to pop round at 8am when I had plans for lunch... just didn't have any respect for my other commitments/schedule, told me he wasn't trying to be pushy, then persisted offering lunch, a spa day etc etc. So I asked him what he was going to teach his daughter about setting boundaries and men who can't take no for an answer." Did he reply after that? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The number of guys (not all guys and I'm sorry to the ones who don't) for yet another guy thread but..... I've notice there seems to be an increase in guys who just can't/won't accept no for an answer. If they can't in a message, I dread to think what they would be like in person. Rant over " Solution is very simple .. block | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"If only there was a block button or some kind of message filter system Woe is me" Fab should think about adding these things then women wouldn't have to go to the forums. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"If only there was a block button or some kind of message filter system Woe is me Fab should think about adding these things then women wouldn't have to go to the forums." Lol haaa i should have read the forum before my reply... spot on | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So did you forget to block or do you just keep them unblocked for attention.. " something us men dare not say. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"If only there was a block button or some kind of message filter system Woe is me" Agree. It's time for ALL women and couples to use the block ALL men message filter. No men will ever be able to message first again. Problem solved! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So did you forget to block or do you just keep them unblocked for attention.. something us men dare not say." Someone messages, she says no, they give her grief. How does the block button help AFTER the bad behaviour? It stops that person from messaging further. It doesn't stop the next. But some have to find a way to avoid putting any blame on the person who was unpleasant. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"If only there was a block button or some kind of message filter system Woe is me" If only some men didn't behave like cockwombles. Don't blame women for mens' behaviour. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"If only there was a block button or some kind of message filter system Woe is me Agree. It's time for ALL women and couples to use the block ALL men message filter. No men will ever be able to message first again. Problem solved! " #allmen | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"If only there was a block button or some kind of message filter system Woe is me Agree. It's time for ALL women and couples to use the block ALL men message filter. No men will ever be able to message first again. Problem solved! #allmen " No tall men | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"If only there was a block button or some kind of message filter system Woe is me Agree. It's time for ALL women and couples to use the block ALL men message filter. No men will ever be able to message first again. Problem solved! #allmen " No. …. But also yes. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Probably gonna get battered for this but why should women have to block all men just because some men are dicks?" They shouldn’t have to, but since you can’t change all men’s behaviour you either have to accept that it’ll happen or take steps to protect yourself The same way that lions at the zoo shouldn’t attack people, but because we can’t stop them doing it we put a fence up | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Only on here can one read about how many times a women has to say no, when there is a block button? Beggars belief." This ^^. Not interested - block. Never had any issues. Makes for a simple life . I like a simple life. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Probably gonna get battered for this but why should women have to block all men just because some men are dicks?" They don’t. Just block the ones who message that you have no interest in. I really don’t get how many threads there are about this. It really is quite easy. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Probably gonna get battered for this but why should women have to block all men just because some men are dicks?" The same way I decided to send the odd message out there. Some accounts will ignore you. Some won’t. We’ve got to realise some people will do things the way we do and we have the same mindset, and some just won’t hold a door open for you even though you right behind them walking into a shop. Ie - they only think about themselves. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Only on here can one read about how many times a women has to say no, when there is a block button? Beggars belief. This ^^. Not interested - block. Never had any issues. Makes for a simple life . I like a simple life. " Oi. No common sense on ‘ere Take your fancy pancy logic somewhere else! It’s not welcome in these ‘ere parts | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Probably gonna get battered for this but why should women have to block all men just because some men are dicks?" You shouldn’t. But, it’s the only tool available to silence those types. One could shout that some men should change their behaviour instead. But that’s a pipe dream, as even the most idealistic person in the world knows that there’s always gonna be that unsavoury element. There’s no re-educating some. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Probably gonna get battered for this but why should women have to block all men just because some men are dicks? They don’t. Just block the ones who message that you have no interest in. I really don’t get how many threads there are about this. It really is quite easy. " Anything but expecting men to take some responsibility for their behaviour | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Only on here can one read about how many times a women has to say no, when there is a block button? Beggars belief. This ^^. Not interested - block. Never had any issues. Makes for a simple life . I like a simple life. Oi. No common sense on ‘ere Take your fancy pancy logic somewhere else! It’s not welcome in these ‘ere parts " Yeah I realised that a long time ago! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Probably gonna get battered for this but why should women have to block all men just because some men are dicks? They don’t. Just block the ones who message that you have no interest in. I really don’t get how many threads there are about this. It really is quite easy. Anything but expecting men to take some responsibility for their behaviour " Yeah because lots of threads will do that. You want the hassle of it all then crack on. I don’t. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Probably gonna get battered for this but why should women have to block all men just because some men are dicks?" I don't think anyone said women have to block all men. It's an option that is available that would drastically reduce the volume of abusive messages. It's an option and not the only option that's available but it's one that changes the dynamic in fab. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Probably gonna get battered for this but why should women have to block all men just because some men are dicks? They don’t. Just block the ones who message that you have no interest in. I really don’t get how many threads there are about this. It really is quite easy. Anything but expecting men to take some responsibility for their behaviour Yeah because lots of threads will do that. You want the hassle of it all then crack on. I don’t. " It's a hassle for you to acknowledge that some guys behave like arseholes? But just not to you so it's ok? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Probably gonna get battered for this but why should women have to block all men just because some men are dicks? They don’t. Just block the ones who message that you have no interest in. I really don’t get how many threads there are about this. It really is quite easy. Anything but expecting men to take some responsibility for their behaviour Yeah because lots of threads will do that. You want the hassle of it all then crack on. I don’t. It's a hassle for you to acknowledge that some guys behave like arseholes? But just not to you so it's ok?" What on earth are you on about? You don’t half twist things. I’m just here for a laugh yes. No hassle. I’m very happy with the way I do things. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Probably gonna get battered for this but why should women have to block all men just because some men are dicks? They don’t. Just block the ones who message that you have no interest in. I really don’t get how many threads there are about this. It really is quite easy. Anything but expecting men to take some responsibility for their behaviour " #allmen | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Probably gonna get battered for this but why should women have to block all men just because some men are dicks? They don’t. Just block the ones who message that you have no interest in. I really don’t get how many threads there are about this. It really is quite easy. Anything but expecting men to take some responsibility for their behaviour Yeah because lots of threads will do that. You want the hassle of it all then crack on. I don’t. It's a hassle for you to acknowledge that some guys behave like arseholes? But just not to you so it's ok? What on earth are you on about? You don’t half twist things. I’m just here for a laugh yes. No hassle. I’m very happy with the way I do things. " Did I twist things? Or just state the truth? Ok Nora. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Probably gonna get battered for this but why should women have to block all men just because some men are dicks? I don't think anyone said women have to block all men. It's an option that is available that would drastically reduce the volume of abusive messages. It's an option and not the only option that's available but it's one that changes the dynamic in fab. " Yes, someone did. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Probably gonna get battered for this but why should women have to block all men just because some men are dicks? They don’t. Just block the ones who message that you have no interest in. I really don’t get how many threads there are about this. It really is quite easy. Anything but expecting men to take some responsibility for their behaviour Yeah because lots of threads will do that. You want the hassle of it all then crack on. I don’t. It's a hassle for you to acknowledge that some guys behave like arseholes? But just not to you so it's ok? What on earth are you on about? You don’t half twist things. I’m just here for a laugh yes. No hassle. I’m very happy with the way I do things. Did I twist things? Or just state the truth? Ok Nora. " Yep you most certainly did. It’s a hassle to deal with the arseholes so I block them hence you’re right it doesn’t happen to me. Understand now? Maybe my wording wasn’t the best. Apologies. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Probably gonna get battered for this but why should women have to block all men just because some men are dicks? I don't think anyone said women have to block all men. It's an option that is available that would drastically reduce the volume of abusive messages. It's an option and not the only option that's available but it's one that changes the dynamic in fab. " Yeah it’s been said | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some people seem to have missed the point of the thread (typical fab) I have been on the site long enough to know how to use the filters provided. I was just voicing my opinion (which I believe everyone is entitled to do) about how they would behave on a meet if they can't take a simple no online.....really shouldn't have bothered!" Sorry, typical bloke, can’t read. Words hard, pictures needed Let’s be thankful these types of guys tend to out themselves way before they get on to a meet. Imagine yikes | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Probably gonna get battered for this but why should women have to block all men just because some men are dicks? They don’t. Just block the ones who message that you have no interest in. I really don’t get how many threads there are about this. It really is quite easy. Anything but expecting men to take some responsibility for their behaviour " Which men need to take responsibility? I accept the op is just venting some steam, but where is this going to help by posting in the forum where most of us men will read it and be in complete agreement. Not once have I ever read a guy com in here and confess they have done this and honestly apologised and told they will never do it again. …. *waits Nobody said they are sorry yet? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Probably gonna get battered for this but why should women have to block all men just because some men are dicks? They don’t. Just block the ones who message that you have no interest in. I really don’t get how many threads there are about this. It really is quite easy. Anything but expecting men to take some responsibility for their behaviour Yeah because lots of threads will do that. You want the hassle of it all then crack on. I don’t. It's a hassle for you to acknowledge that some guys behave like arseholes? But just not to you so it's ok? What on earth are you on about? You don’t half twist things. I’m just here for a laugh yes. No hassle. I’m very happy with the way I do things. Did I twist things? Or just state the truth? Ok Nora. Yep you most certainly did. It’s a hassle to deal with the arseholes so I block them hence you’re right it doesn’t happen to me. Understand now? Maybe my wording wasn’t the best. Apologies. " Why did you come on the thread, Nora? Perhaps it's time to do another "how wonderful men are" thread? Because a few pesky women dared to say that some guys don't behave well here. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some people seem to have missed the point of the thread (typical fab) I have been on the site long enough to know how to use the filters provided. I was just voicing my opinion (which I believe everyone is entitled to do) about how they would behave on a meet if they can't take a simple no online.....really shouldn't have bothered!" You can express your opinion by all means. You also have to allow others to express theirs in reply and allow others to express opinions that may disagree with yours. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"Probably gonna get battered for this but why should women have to block all men just because some men are dicks? They don’t. Just block the ones who message that you have no interest in. I really don’t get how many threads there are about this. It really is quite easy. Anything but expecting men to take some responsibility for their behaviour Yeah because lots of threads will do that. You want the hassle of it all then crack on. I don’t. It's a hassle for you to acknowledge that some guys behave like arseholes? But just not to you so it's ok? What on earth are you on about? You don’t half twist things. I’m just here for a laugh yes. No hassle. I’m very happy with the way I do things. Did I twist things? Or just state the truth? Ok Nora. Yep you most certainly did. It’s a hassle to deal with the arseholes so I block them hence you’re right it doesn’t happen to me. Understand now? Maybe my wording wasn’t the best. Apologies. Why did you come on the thread, Nora? Perhaps it's time to do another "how wonderful men are" thread? Because a few pesky women dared to say that some guys don't behave well here. " . I’ll leave you to it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"… I was just voicing my opinion (which I believe everyone is entitled to do) about how they would behave on a meet if they can't take a simple no online.....really shouldn't have bothered!" I avoided answering that, simply because of the answers are a subject often encouraged to avoid in here. I like logging in here daily. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The number of guys (not all guys and I'm sorry to the ones who don't) for yet another guy thread but..... I've notice there seems to be an increase in guys who just can't/won't accept no for an answer. If they can't in a message, I dread to think what they would be like in person. Rant over " I don’t bother worrying what they would be like in person, as I wouldn’t be meeting them. But for those that do meet them they could behave any number of ways, just the same as the polite ones who take no for an answer online could. I avoid unwanted online interaction by using the block button freely and regularly, making my Fab experience much more enjoyable. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Probably gonna get battered for this but why should women have to block all men just because some men are dicks? They don’t. Just block the ones who message that you have no interest in. I really don’t get how many threads there are about this. It really is quite easy. Anything but expecting men to take some responsibility for their behaviour Which men need to take responsibility? I accept the op is just venting some steam, but where is this going to help by posting in the forum where most of us men will read it and be in complete agreement. Not once have I ever read a guy com in here and confess they have done this and honestly apologised and told they will never do it again. …. *waits Nobody said they are sorry yet? " Hang on, Woody. How many threads a day where men "vent steam" about their dick size or women not politely saying thank you or woe is me Im not getting any meets? Do you ask each one of them "where is this going to help?". Because I haven't seen you do that. Why can't a woman vent about frustrating behaviour from some guys who are unlikely to even be on the forum? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some people seem to have missed the point of the thread (typical fab) I have been on the site long enough to know how to use the filters provided. I was just voicing my opinion (which I believe everyone is entitled to do) about how they would behave on a meet if they can't take a simple no online.....really shouldn't have bothered!" I often think that, hence why I rarely start threads these days. The forums never change eh | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"One thing about men on fab, they’re gonna cry about women talking about their experiences with men being shitty. That or they’re going to jump through hoops to say that they’re not one of those guys. " #allmen | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"One thing about men on fab, they’re gonna cry about women talking about their experiences with men being shitty. That or they’re going to jump through hoops to say that they’re not one of those guys. #allmen " Are you one of those guys, Rex? I wonder | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"One thing about men on fab, they’re gonna cry about women talking about their experiences with men being shitty. That or they’re going to jump through hoops to say that they’re not one of those guys. #allmen Are you one of those guys, Rex? I wonder " I don’t send messages asking for meets. Nice try | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"One thing about men on fab, they’re gonna cry about women talking about their experiences with men being shitty. That or they’re going to jump through hoops to say that they’re not one of those guys. #allmen Are you one of those guys, Rex? I wonder I don’t send messages asking for meets. Nice try " Tbf, I wasn’t suggesting you can’t take no for an answer. I’m not that horrid. Only that you might be in the #NotAllMen brigade | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The number of guys (not all guys and I'm sorry to the ones who don't) for yet another guy thread but..... I've notice there seems to be an increase in guys who just can't/won't accept no for an answer. If they can't in a message, I dread to think what they would be like in person. Rant over It coincides with the amount of threads making guys feel like shot when we shouldn’t feel like shit. It’s not my fault assholes exist. And you know what, some still are assholes, and let’s all agree, there will be some as lot of assholes in the future. But just ignore the fuckers. And they’ll go away, and hopefully find each other. Op, you’ve been around for a while, you should know this by now. *Woody is not in the mood for another man bashing thread. Hence why I apologised to the ones who don't x" No need to apologise it is what it is unfortunately | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"…… …. *waits Nobody said they are sorry yet? Hang on, Woody. How many threads a day where men "vent steam" about their dick size or women not politely saying thank you or woe is me Im not getting any meets? Do you ask each one of them "where is this going to help?". Because I haven't seen you do that. ….." Keep an eye out. I try not to white night men or women, but I post my opinions. This just got at me at the wrong time, and I’m sticking to my feelings last night. It just hit when a guy was already feeling shit. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"One thing about men on fab, they’re gonna cry about women talking about their experiences with men being shitty. That or they’re going to jump through hoops to say that they’re not one of those guys. #allmen Are you one of those guys, Rex? I wonder I don’t send messages asking for meets. Nice try Tbf, I wasn’t suggesting you can’t take no for an answer. I’m not that horrid. Only that you might be in the #NotAllMen brigade " Schoderings right there ^^ | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"…… …. *waits Nobody said they are sorry yet? Hang on, Woody. How many threads a day where men "vent steam" about their dick size or women not politely saying thank you or woe is me Im not getting any meets? Do you ask each one of them "where is this going to help?". Because I haven't seen you do that. ….. Keep an eye out. I try not to white night men or women, but I post my opinions. This just got at me at the wrong time, and I’m sticking to my feelings last night. It just hit when a guy was already feeling shit. " Lol, I will. Although I avoid those threads usually. I'm sorry you are/were feeling shit - it didn't seem your usual vibe. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"One thing about men on fab, they’re gonna cry about women talking about their experiences with men being shitty. That or they’re going to jump through hoops to say that they’re not one of those guys. #allmen Are you one of those guys, Rex? I wonder I don’t send messages asking for meets. Nice try Tbf, I wasn’t suggesting you can’t take no for an answer. I’m not that horrid. Only that you might be in the #NotAllMen brigade Schoderings right there ^^ " I liked you more in person. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Whether or not they can't accept it makes no difference to the outcome. Say no thanks to them and then never message them again. That's it, conversation over. They might continue to send you messages at which point you can block them. In my experience everyone I've ever politely declined has been very accepting and understanding... though the occasional one might try asking "why"... but if I'm not responding it really doesn't matter what they say. My main point of the post was how they would be during a meet if that's how they behave online x" Exactly. this is quite a scary thought | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Thanks to all who got the point x" Sparkle you are beautiful and you and everyone here deserves respect. Its not like you are asking for anything special! X | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think say no in person and they would run away with their tails between their legs then slag you off to their mates." Personally I think they would try and coerce the other person. All I can say is I'm glad they out themselves on here first | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"One thing about men on fab, they’re gonna cry about women talking about their experiences with men being shitty. That or they’re going to jump through hoops to say that they’re not one of those guys. " Agreed. A thread to let off some steam and get some answers. I wouldn't block all men as I have rarely contact first on here. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The sky is blue The grass is green Men are dickheads All falsifiable statements; the exceptions prove the rule. Would anyone like a cup of tea?" Are you making one? Yes please | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think say no in person and they would run away with their tails between their legs then slag you off to their mates. Personally I think they would try and coerce the other person. All I can say is I'm glad they out themselves on here first " Many people think coercing someone into agreement is the same as consent | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think say no in person and they would run away with their tails between their legs then slag you off to their mates. Personally I think they would try and coerce the other person. All I can say is I'm glad they out themselves on here first Many people think coercing someone into agreement is the same as consent " Yup. We are taught to try to persuade people round to our way of thinking or to take certain action in many areas of life, e.g. professional. But it doesn't apply in matters of sexual consent. No is no. End of. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Mummy’s boys, not used to being told no, I’m surprised half of them don’t get their mum to message and ask “ what’s wrong with my son ? “ The mr " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"As a bi guy my biggest issue is guys that act nice then can’t take no for an answer during the meet I’ve lost how many times I’ve met a guy with the understanding we are doing X, then right away without asking they start trying to do Y Z and everything else Frankly, I’m very thankful when they let me know via message they are that type. The problem is when they can hide it " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"If only there was a block button or some kind of message filter system Woe is me Agree. It's time for ALL women and couples to use the block ALL men message filter. No men will ever be able to message first again. Problem solved! " that wouldn't affect me, as I do not write to any women on this site, the real world offers realistic chances, less entitlement and politeness to each other. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The sky is blue The grass is green Men are dickheads All falsifiable statements; the exceptions prove the rule. Would anyone like a cup of tea? Are you making one? Yes please " Hey heartbreaker, how do you like yours? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think say no in person and they would run away with their tails between their legs then slag you off to their mates. Personally I think they would try and coerce the other person. All I can say is I'm glad they out themselves on here first Many people think coercing someone into agreement is the same as consent Yup. We are taught to try to persuade people round to our way of thinking or to take certain action in many areas of life, e.g. professional. But it doesn't apply in matters of sexual consent. No is no. End of. " Especially professionally. And I wonder if that attitude spills beyond the professional. Idk. But I do know that yeah, lots of people (mostly women) I know and even myself have encountered people that try and coerce a yes out of you. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The sky is blue The grass is green Men are dickheads All falsifiable statements; the exceptions prove the rule. Would anyone like a cup of tea? Are you making one? Yes please Hey heartbreaker, how do you like yours? " Wet and hot darling… like my men | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So did you forget to block or do you just keep them unblocked for attention.. something us men dare not say. Someone messages, she says no, they give her grief. How does the block button help AFTER the bad behaviour? It stops that person from messaging further. It doesn't stop the next. But some have to find a way to avoid putting any blame on the person who was unpleasant. " The way I hear it from others and I would do is if I thought no not for me, I would just block, why reply as there are so many threads concerning this issue, as much as why can't I get a meet threads. Why come to the forum to complain when you can just block, or filter, no excuse for this thread that I can see. Except as another female poster thought is it just about ego? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So did you forget to block or do you just keep them unblocked for attention.. something us men dare not say. Someone messages, she says no, they give her grief. How does the block button help AFTER the bad behaviour? It stops that person from messaging further. It doesn't stop the next. But some have to find a way to avoid putting any blame on the person who was unpleasant. " No not at all, the angry guy or lady who has been refused, would reply to find their message has been blocked simples. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"If only there was a block button or some kind of message filter system Woe is me If only some men didn't behave like cockwombles. Don't blame women for mens' behaviour." Blame, no I just block. it wouldn't even get to a second message with me, so how come it is for you? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Probably gonna get battered for this but why should women have to block all men just because some men are dicks?" Their choice, and I can see why, I can't see why some do not block first time abuse that can be avoided the second time. there are plenty of profiles that state x or y is blocked. so this seems like something else to me. by the way how many views has everyone had today? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Probably gonna get battered for this but why should women have to block all men just because some men are dicks? They don’t. Just block the ones who message that you have no interest in. I really don’t get how many threads there are about this. It really is quite easy. Anything but expecting men to take some responsibility for their behaviour Yeah because lots of threads will do that. You want the hassle of it all then crack on. I don’t. It's a hassle for you to acknowledge that some guys behave like arseholes? But just not to you so it's ok?" She knows that, that is why she blocks and has no hassle and no need to come here and moan about it, | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Thanks to all who got the point x" I got the point. Repetitive behaviour like this becomes exhausting to deal with. I also know this can be virtually dealt with using sufficiently tight messaging filters. Women who block all men from messaging and "hunt" for what they like rarely experience this. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Thanks to all who got the point x I got the point. Repetitive behaviour like this becomes exhausting to deal with. I also know this can be virtually dealt with using sufficiently tight messaging filters. Women who block all men from messaging and "hunt" for what they like rarely experience this." That would put them at risk of facing rejection. Not something many women want to face If the choice is between receiving nasty messages or having to do the messaging themselves, very few are gonna pick the one that takes actual effort | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Thanks to all who got the point x I got the point. Repetitive behaviour like this becomes exhausting to deal with. I also know this can be virtually dealt with using sufficiently tight messaging filters. Women who block all men from messaging and "hunt" for what they like rarely experience this. That would put them at risk of facing rejection. Not something many women want to face If the choice is between receiving nasty messages or having to do the messaging themselves, very few are gonna pick the one that takes actual effort " There's a third option. See if you can guess what it is. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Whether or not they can't accept it makes no difference to the outcome. Say no thanks to them and then never message them again. That's it, conversation over. They might continue to send you messages at which point you can block them. In my experience everyone I've ever politely declined has been very accepting and understanding... though the occasional one might try asking "why"... but if I'm not responding it really doesn't matter what they say. My main point of the post was how they would be during a meet if that's how they behave online x" Not defending them in any way shape or form is it's indefensible, but there may be an element of "keyboard warrior" here and they might be timid in real life. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Thanks to all who got the point x I got the point. Repetitive behaviour like this becomes exhausting to deal with. I also know this can be virtually dealt with using sufficiently tight messaging filters. Women who block all men from messaging and "hunt" for what they like rarely experience this. That would put them at risk of facing rejection. Not something many women want to face If the choice is between receiving nasty messages or having to do the messaging themselves, very few are gonna pick the one that takes actual effort There's a third option. See if you can guess what it is. " There’s only a 3rd option if you can control what other people do Most people learn at quite a young age that you can’t control others actions, only your own | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Thanks to all who got the point x I got the point. Repetitive behaviour like this becomes exhausting to deal with. I also know this can be virtually dealt with using sufficiently tight messaging filters. Women who block all men from messaging and "hunt" for what they like rarely experience this. That would put them at risk of facing rejection. Not something many women want to face If the choice is between receiving nasty messages or having to do the messaging themselves, very few are gonna pick the one that takes actual effort There's a third option. See if you can guess what it is. There’s only a 3rd option if you can control what other people do Most people learn at quite a young age that you can’t control others actions, only your own " It would just so nice if you acknowledged it just once. Instead of the "men are animals" analogy. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Thanks to all who got the point x I got the point. Repetitive behaviour like this becomes exhausting to deal with. I also know this can be virtually dealt with using sufficiently tight messaging filters. Women who block all men from messaging and "hunt" for what they like rarely experience this. That would put them at risk of facing rejection. Not something many women want to face If the choice is between receiving nasty messages or having to do the messaging themselves, very few are gonna pick the one that takes actual effort There's a third option. See if you can guess what it is. There’s only a 3rd option if you can control what other people do Most people learn at quite a young age that you can’t control others actions, only your own It would just so nice if you acknowledged it just once. Instead of the "men are animals" analogy. " People are animals and we can’t control anyone’s behaviour, just our own. As upsetting as that might be | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Why should we change our behaviour because men won't change theirs? I don't want to assume the worst of every man I say no to and block him when he hasn't actually done anything wrong. I don't want to block all men - because I don't want to "hunt" them. I want to politely reply "no thank you" and for men not to be dicks about it. Note: A small minority of men. Who are most likely not in the forum because generally speaking forum men are not dicks. " I'm only gonna address your first point...because it's actually the only thing we can control. And it's empowering | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Thanks to all who got the point x I got the point. Repetitive behaviour like this becomes exhausting to deal with. I also know this can be virtually dealt with using sufficiently tight messaging filters. Women who block all men from messaging and "hunt" for what they like rarely experience this. That would put them at risk of facing rejection. Not something many women want to face If the choice is between receiving nasty messages or having to do the messaging themselves, very few are gonna pick the one that takes actual effort There's a third option. See if you can guess what it is. There’s only a 3rd option if you can control what other people do Most people learn at quite a young age that you can’t control others actions, only your own It would just so nice if you acknowledged it just once. Instead of the "men are animals" analogy. People are animals and we can’t control anyone’s behaviour, just our own. As upsetting as that might be " What's upsetting is getting grief for being polite. When the number of weekly threads by men complaining that women are rude far outnumbers this kind of thread. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Why should we change our behaviour because men won't change theirs? I don't want to assume the worst of every man I say no to and block him when he hasn't actually done anything wrong. I don't want to block all men - because I don't want to "hunt" them. I want to politely reply "no thank you" and for men not to be dicks about it. Note: A small minority of men. Who are most likely not in the forum because generally speaking forum men are not dicks. I'm only gonna address your first point...because it's actually the only thing we can control. And it's empowering " Might be for you. I don't find it empowering. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Thanks to all who got the point x I got the point. Repetitive behaviour like this becomes exhausting to deal with. I also know this can be virtually dealt with using sufficiently tight messaging filters. Women who block all men from messaging and "hunt" for what they like rarely experience this. That would put them at risk of facing rejection. Not something many women want to face If the choice is between receiving nasty messages or having to do the messaging themselves, very few are gonna pick the one that takes actual effort There's a third option. See if you can guess what it is. There’s only a 3rd option if you can control what other people do Most people learn at quite a young age that you can’t control others actions, only your own It would just so nice if you acknowledged it just once. Instead of the "men are animals" analogy. People are animals and we can’t control anyone’s behaviour, just our own. As upsetting as that might be What's upsetting is getting grief for being polite. When the number of weekly threads by men complaining that women are rude far outnumbers this kind of thread. " Maybe because men make up the majority of the users on the site and the forum, and men are doing the majority of the messaging, so they take the majority of the rejection As for grief for being police, I can only say that’s awful and I’m sorry it happens to anyone. And as other have said, it’s not just men, I’ve had nasty replies from women, couples and men. It’s not right, but sadly it’s something that happens | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"Why should we change our behaviour because men won't change theirs? I don't want to assume the worst of every man I say no to and block him when he hasn't actually done anything wrong. I don't want to block all men - because I don't want to "hunt" them. I want to politely reply "no thank you" and for men not to be dicks about it. Note: A small minority of men. Who are most likely not in the forum because generally speaking forum men are not dicks. I'm only gonna address your first point...because it's actually the only thing we can control. And it's empowering Might be for you. I don't find it empowering. " I'd say it's the very definition of empowerment. But I don't think you'll agree | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Why should we change our behaviour because men won't change theirs? I don't want to assume the worst of every man I say no to and block him when he hasn't actually done anything wrong. I don't want to block all men - because I don't want to "hunt" them. I want to politely reply "no thank you" and for men not to be dicks about it. Note: A small minority of men. Who are most likely not in the forum because generally speaking forum men are not dicks. I'm only gonna address your first point...because it's actually the only thing we can control. And it's empowering Might be for you. I don't find it empowering. I'd say it's the very definition of empowerment. But I don't think you'll agree " It is empowering, as you get to see that others behaviour is just that others behaviour. What we have Control over is how we respond or react to others behaviour. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Thanks to all who got the point x I got the point. Repetitive behaviour like this becomes exhausting to deal with. I also know this can be virtually dealt with using sufficiently tight messaging filters. Women who block all men from messaging and "hunt" for what they like rarely experience this. That would put them at risk of facing rejection. Not something many women want to face If the choice is between receiving nasty messages or having to do the messaging themselves, very few are gonna pick the one that takes actual effort There's a third option. See if you can guess what it is. There’s only a 3rd option if you can control what other people do Most people learn at quite a young age that you can’t control others actions, only your own It would just so nice if you acknowledged it just once. Instead of the "men are animals" analogy. " The whole men are animals thing is so tiring. They choose to behave in this way, it is not something that is innate in all men, there is not some primal drive that forces men to not accept being told no. Anyone putting forward the idea that this is the case is an apologist for bad behaviour. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Thanks to all who got the point x I got the point. Repetitive behaviour like this becomes exhausting to deal with. I also know this can be virtually dealt with using sufficiently tight messaging filters. Women who block all men from messaging and "hunt" for what they like rarely experience this. That would put them at risk of facing rejection. Not something many women want to face If the choice is between receiving nasty messages or having to do the messaging themselves, very few are gonna pick the one that takes actual effort There's a third option. See if you can guess what it is. There’s only a 3rd option if you can control what other people do Most people learn at quite a young age that you can’t control others actions, only your own It would just so nice if you acknowledged it just once. Instead of the "men are animals" analogy. The whole men are animals thing is so tiring. They choose to behave in this way, it is not something that is innate in all men, there is not some primal drive that forces men to not accept being told no. Anyone putting forward the idea that this is the case is an apologist for bad behaviour." That’s just a fundamental misunderstanding of the point though Bad behaviour isn’t acceptable, obviously But you can’t control other peoples behaviour, only your own. That means either accepting your gonna get shitty messages sometimes or taking measures the reduce them by either blocking people or using messaging filters | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Thanks to all who got the point x I got the point. Repetitive behaviour like this becomes exhausting to deal with. I also know this can be virtually dealt with using sufficiently tight messaging filters. Women who block all men from messaging and "hunt" for what they like rarely experience this. That would put them at risk of facing rejection. Not something many women want to face If the choice is between receiving nasty messages or having to do the messaging themselves, very few are gonna pick the one that takes actual effort There's a third option. See if you can guess what it is. There’s only a 3rd option if you can control what other people do Most people learn at quite a young age that you can’t control others actions, only your own It would just so nice if you acknowledged it just once. Instead of the "men are animals" analogy. The whole men are animals thing is so tiring. They choose to behave in this way, it is not something that is innate in all men, there is not some primal drive that forces men to not accept being told no. Anyone putting forward the idea that this is the case is an apologist for bad behaviour. That’s just a fundamental misunderstanding of the point though Bad behaviour isn’t acceptable, obviously But you can’t control other peoples behaviour, only your own. That means either accepting your gonna get shitty messages sometimes or taking measures the reduce them by either blocking people or using messaging filters " You don't see how putting the onus on the people who are victims of bad behaviour to be the people who mitigate against it is problematic? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Thanks to all who got the point x I got the point. Repetitive behaviour like this becomes exhausting to deal with. I also know this can be virtually dealt with using sufficiently tight messaging filters. Women who block all men from messaging and "hunt" for what they like rarely experience this. That would put them at risk of facing rejection. Not something many women want to face If the choice is between receiving nasty messages or having to do the messaging themselves, very few are gonna pick the one that takes actual effort " I'd agree with this. I've spoken to a few forum friends before who stated they don't like rejection with one mentioning being terrified of it. It's much easier taking a passive approach and filtering through all the garbage they're inundated with rather than being proactive and risking disappointment. I'll add that despite a lot of the attention being negative the constant solicitation / adulation (even if fake) makes for an ego boost. All that disappears with very tight filters. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So did you forget to block or do you just keep them unblocked for attention.. something us men dare not say. Someone messages, she says no, they give her grief. How does the block button help AFTER the bad behaviour? It stops that person from messaging further. It doesn't stop the next. But some have to find a way to avoid putting any blame on the person who was unpleasant. The way I hear it from others and I would do is if I thought no not for me, I would just block, why reply as there are so many threads concerning this issue, as much as why can't I get a meet threads. Why come to the forum to complain when you can just block, or filter, no excuse for this thread that I can see. Except as another female poster thought is it just about ego?" Not complaining at all and certainly not done for an ego boost....I was making an observation | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Thanks to all who got the point x I got the point. Repetitive behaviour like this becomes exhausting to deal with. I also know this can be virtually dealt with using sufficiently tight messaging filters. Women who block all men from messaging and "hunt" for what they like rarely experience this. That would put them at risk of facing rejection. Not something many women want to face If the choice is between receiving nasty messages or having to do the messaging themselves, very few are gonna pick the one that takes actual effort There's a third option. See if you can guess what it is. There’s only a 3rd option if you can control what other people do Most people learn at quite a young age that you can’t control others actions, only your own It would just so nice if you acknowledged it just once. Instead of the "men are animals" analogy. The whole men are animals thing is so tiring. They choose to behave in this way, it is not something that is innate in all men, there is not some primal drive that forces men to not accept being told no. Anyone putting forward the idea that this is the case is an apologist for bad behaviour. That’s just a fundamental misunderstanding of the point though Bad behaviour isn’t acceptable, obviously But you can’t control other peoples behaviour, only your own. That means either accepting your gonna get shitty messages sometimes or taking measures the reduce them by either blocking people or using messaging filters You don't see how putting the onus on the people who are victims of bad behaviour to be the people who mitigate against it is problematic?" No, it’s realistic. We can’t control other peoples behaviour. It sucks I gotta lock my door at night too. But I can’t control other people behaviours I know the ultimate answer is to live in s society where we don’t get nasty messages and I can leave my front door unlocked, but since we don’t then we have to take steps to protect ourselves, or accept the risk of not doing so | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Thanks to all who got the point x I got the point. Repetitive behaviour like this becomes exhausting to deal with. I also know this can be virtually dealt with using sufficiently tight messaging filters. Women who block all men from messaging and "hunt" for what they like rarely experience this. That would put them at risk of facing rejection. Not something many women want to face If the choice is between receiving nasty messages or having to do the messaging themselves, very few are gonna pick the one that takes actual effort I'd agree with this. I've spoken to a few forum friends before who stated they don't like rejection with one mentioning being terrified of it. It's much easier taking a passive approach and filtering through all the garbage they're inundated with rather than being proactive and risking disappointment. I'll add that despite a lot of the attention being negative the constant solicitation / adulation (even if fake) makes for an ego boost. All that disappears with very tight filters." A very uncomfortable truth many don’t want to admitt | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I do hate this. I find it so hard to tell someone that I'm not interested, it makes me feel so guilty. Instead, I mark as unread and hope they just think they got lost in the messages, as that does tend to happen a lot. But if they keep messaging, I do reply with a kind message or just simply block. Which again, still makes me feel bad. But it bothers me so much, when I've messaged someone to let them know that I'm not interested, if they then keep messaging. I already feel bad enough, don't make it worse! So then it's a simple block. It's the worst thing about fab, the guilt I feel for maybe making someone feel rejected, as I suffer big time with rejection sensitivity, so I'm very aware how I could make others feel. " You are stunning. If I ever messaged you and you rejected me I wouldn't become abusive or persistent I'd accept it and be grateful you at least replied. Don't feel bad for saying no. X | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Thanks to all who got the point x I got the point. Repetitive behaviour like this becomes exhausting to deal with. I also know this can be virtually dealt with using sufficiently tight messaging filters. Women who block all men from messaging and "hunt" for what they like rarely experience this. That would put them at risk of facing rejection. Not something many women want to face If the choice is between receiving nasty messages or having to do the messaging themselves, very few are gonna pick the one that takes actual effort There's a third option. See if you can guess what it is. There’s only a 3rd option if you can control what other people do Most people learn at quite a young age that you can’t control others actions, only your own It would just so nice if you acknowledged it just once. Instead of the "men are animals" analogy. The whole men are animals thing is so tiring. They choose to behave in this way, it is not something that is innate in all men, there is not some primal drive that forces men to not accept being told no. Anyone putting forward the idea that this is the case is an apologist for bad behaviour. That’s just a fundamental misunderstanding of the point though Bad behaviour isn’t acceptable, obviously But you can’t control other peoples behaviour, only your own. That means either accepting your gonna get shitty messages sometimes or taking measures the reduce them by either blocking people or using messaging filters You don't see how putting the onus on the people who are victims of bad behaviour to be the people who mitigate against it is problematic? No, it’s realistic. We can’t control other peoples behaviour. It sucks I gotta lock my door at night too. But I can’t control other people behaviours I know the ultimate answer is to live in s society where we don’t get nasty messages and I can leave my front door unlocked, but since we don’t then we have to take steps to protect ourselves, or accept the risk of not doing so " …I would have thought it was common sense …I got called a frigid cunt for turning someone down so we blocked and problem solved no hassle and no dramas .. I very much doubt these idiots speak to women in real life their more likely to be sat behind a keyboard wanking over pictures.. We attend a lot of group socials and clubs and we have never had any issues with men … | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Thanks to all who got the point x I got the point. Repetitive behaviour like this becomes exhausting to deal with. I also know this can be virtually dealt with using sufficiently tight messaging filters. Women who block all men from messaging and "hunt" for what they like rarely experience this. That would put them at risk of facing rejection. Not something many women want to face If the choice is between receiving nasty messages or having to do the messaging themselves, very few are gonna pick the one that takes actual effort There's a third option. See if you can guess what it is. There’s only a 3rd option if you can control what other people do Most people learn at quite a young age that you can’t control others actions, only your own It would just so nice if you acknowledged it just once. Instead of the "men are animals" analogy. The whole men are animals thing is so tiring. They choose to behave in this way, it is not something that is innate in all men, there is not some primal drive that forces men to not accept being told no. Anyone putting forward the idea that this is the case is an apologist for bad behaviour. That’s just a fundamental misunderstanding of the point though Bad behaviour isn’t acceptable, obviously But you can’t control other peoples behaviour, only your own. That means either accepting your gonna get shitty messages sometimes or taking measures the reduce them by either blocking people or using messaging filters You don't see how putting the onus on the people who are victims of bad behaviour to be the people who mitigate against it is problematic? No, it’s realistic. We can’t control other peoples behaviour. It sucks I gotta lock my door at night too. But I can’t control other people behaviours I know the ultimate answer is to live in s society where we don’t get nasty messages and I can leave my front door unlocked, but since we don’t then we have to take steps to protect ourselves, or accept the risk of not doing so " The longer bad behaviour is accepted then the longer it will continue. For men it is largely annoying, for women it is potentially a whole lot more serious. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The longer bad behaviour is accepted then the longer it will continue. For men it is largely annoying, for women it is potentially a whole lot more serious." facts | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Thanks to all who got the point x I got the point. Repetitive behaviour like this becomes exhausting to deal with. I also know this can be virtually dealt with using sufficiently tight messaging filters. Women who block all men from messaging and "hunt" for what they like rarely experience this. That would put them at risk of facing rejection. Not something many women want to face If the choice is between receiving nasty messages or having to do the messaging themselves, very few are gonna pick the one that takes actual effort There's a third option. See if you can guess what it is. There’s only a 3rd option if you can control what other people do Most people learn at quite a young age that you can’t control others actions, only your own It would just so nice if you acknowledged it just once. Instead of the "men are animals" analogy. The whole men are animals thing is so tiring. They choose to behave in this way, it is not something that is innate in all men, there is not some primal drive that forces men to not accept being told no. Anyone putting forward the idea that this is the case is an apologist for bad behaviour. That’s just a fundamental misunderstanding of the point though Bad behaviour isn’t acceptable, obviously But you can’t control other peoples behaviour, only your own. That means either accepting your gonna get shitty messages sometimes or taking measures the reduce them by either blocking people or using messaging filters You don't see how putting the onus on the people who are victims of bad behaviour to be the people who mitigate against it is problematic? No, it’s realistic. We can’t control other peoples behaviour. It sucks I gotta lock my door at night too. But I can’t control other people behaviours I know the ultimate answer is to live in s society where we don’t get nasty messages and I can leave my front door unlocked, but since we don’t then we have to take steps to protect ourselves, or accept the risk of not doing so …I would have thought it was common sense …I got called a frigid cunt for turning someone down so we blocked and problem solved no hassle and no dramas .. I very much doubt these idiots speak to women in real life their more likely to be sat behind a keyboard wanking over pictures.. We attend a lot of group socials and clubs and we have never had any issues with men …" Keyboard warriors. Loud behind their phone, quiet as a mouse in person I’ve taken so many rejections I can’t count, but I never saw the point in wasting energy being nasty after, even if I was annoyed/upset, it’s my issue to deal with | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Thanks to all who got the point x I got the point. Repetitive behaviour like this becomes exhausting to deal with. I also know this can be virtually dealt with using sufficiently tight messaging filters. Women who block all men from messaging and "hunt" for what they like rarely experience this. That would put them at risk of facing rejection. Not something many women want to face If the choice is between receiving nasty messages or having to do the messaging themselves, very few are gonna pick the one that takes actual effort I'd agree with this. I've spoken to a few forum friends before who stated they don't like rejection with one mentioning being terrified of it. It's much easier taking a passive approach and filtering through all the garbage they're inundated with rather than being proactive and risking disappointment. I'll add that despite a lot of the attention being negative the constant solicitation / adulation (even if fake) makes for an ego boost. All that disappears with very tight filters. A very uncomfortable truth many don’t want to admitt " That's like saying women shouldn't wear short skirts if they don't want to be sexually harassed | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So did you forget to block or do you just keep them unblocked for attention.. something us men dare not say. Someone messages, she says no, they give her grief. How does the block button help AFTER the bad behaviour? It stops that person from messaging further. It doesn't stop the next. But some have to find a way to avoid putting any blame on the person who was unpleasant. The way I hear it from others and I would do is if I thought no not for me, I would just block, why reply as there are so many threads concerning this issue, as much as why can't I get a meet threads. Why come to the forum to complain when you can just block, or filter, no excuse for this thread that I can see. Except as another female poster thought is it just about ego?" You deffo not got the point of the thread have u? X | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
back to top |