Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do you want people to like you for you? Or do you mind if they seem to only or mainly like you for a specific feature (hair colour, penis size, body size/ shape, age etc)? I sometimes question myself. I feel like maybe I’m being a bit sensitive and snowflakey. Obviously I snap out of it but I’m keen to hear other perspectives. Particularly of those that don’t really care what someone likes/ desires them for I guess. I’m off work today so doing some thinking. " Morning op Try not to do to much thinking it can turn into over thinking | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do you want people to like you for you? Or do you mind if they seem to only or mainly like you for a specific feature (hair colour, penis size, body size/ shape, age etc)? I sometimes question myself. I feel like maybe I’m being a bit sensitive and snowflakey. Obviously I snap out of it but I’m keen to hear other perspectives. Particularly of those that don’t really care what someone likes/ desires them for I guess. I’m off work today so doing some thinking. " People like me for me and nothing else. If they cannot accept me for me it is how life is op | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think that a lot of people court approval via their physical features though. " That's human nature though. People 'like' to be considered attractive and desired. But that doesn't take into account personality at all. Looks will only get you so far, unless People are just after a conversationless, purely physical interaction. But some are happy with that of course. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think that a lot of people court approval via their physical features though. That's human nature though. People 'like' to be considered attractive and desired. But that doesn't take into account personality at all. Looks will only get you so far, unless People are just after a conversationless, purely physical interaction. But some are happy with that of course." It surely is human nature. Otherwise we'd all have one candid photo and verifications attesting to our charity work and kitten rescuing abilities | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don’t think I’ve ever really put much thought into it. I like me. The people that matter to me like me. May seem odd but I’m not really that bothered about anyone else really. " I'm of a similar mind. I like to think that I'm more than just a body to the people I engage with sexually but that's 99% social conditioning. Intellectually I know they can't possibly know the real me | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't care to be someone's fetish. I used to get a lot of messages from young guys wanting me to play mummy. I can't do anything about my age, but I don't want that to be the only thing someone meets me for. Same thing with being fat. I've had messages from guys who just want fat - the fatter the better - and they don't give a shiny shite about anything else. I'm afraid it's a huge turn-off for me." Same. This is my feeling. I here possible I avoid people that give off these vibes. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not to get all philosophical, but what is 'me'? I'm just a sum of my (inner and outer) parts. I guess I'm implicitly accepting the physicalist explanation of mind/consciousness. Anyway, I don't mind at all. I'm happy if they like whatever they do about me. I'd be miserable if I wanted people to like *everything* about me. It'd also contradict something I think and have said before - the only person who can tolerate all of me is myself " Rare I come across anyone who considers 'the hard problem' even psychiatrists. What is your view on what consciousness is? A trick the brain plays on itself, when it reaches a certain level of complexity? Your next paragraph made me smile. I think it is a challenge too, accepting oneself; not simply a choice. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I find this hard to answer, because I am not sure I relate to the process of breaking things down to their constituent parts. Or I am not sure it is beneficial. As an example. I like a flower, I may find its petals appealling: if I pull off a petal - then it is not the same sensation. How many petals do I need to pull off before it ceases to be a flower? When I can experience myself in that way, warts and all (so to speak) then I tend to experience others holistically too. Which creates the conditions for connection, at least the part I can play in that." I like this analogy. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"People only pretend to like me because I'm a wet hole with big boobs. Or to try and get gossip from me or use me to do stuff for them at work. No point being bothered by it. " At least you’re still a wet hole at your age | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"People only pretend to like me because I'm a wet hole with big boobs. Or to try and get gossip from me or use me to do stuff for them at work. No point being bothered by it. At least you’re still a wet hole at your age " I take umbrage at that comment. Not sure why. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"People only pretend to like me because I'm a wet hole with big boobs. Or to try and get gossip from me or use me to do stuff for them at work. No point being bothered by it. At least you’re still a wet hole at your age I take umbrage at that comment. Not sure why. " It was a terrible comment I apologise x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"People only pretend to like me because I'm a wet hole with big boobs. Or to try and get gossip from me or use me to do stuff for them at work. No point being bothered by it. At least you’re still a wet hole at your age I take umbrage at that comment. Not sure why. It was a terrible comment I apologise x" It was to Outsider actshually. I'm just being a nob cos I'm ancient | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"People only pretend to like me because I'm a wet hole with big boobs. Or to try and get gossip from me or use me to do stuff for them at work. No point being bothered by it. At least you’re still a wet hole at your age I take umbrage at that comment. Not sure why. It was a terrible comment I apologise x It was to Outsider actshually. I'm just being a nob cos I'm ancient " I know it was haha. I’m apologising for the offence I caused x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"People only pretend to like me because I'm a wet hole with big boobs. Or to try and get gossip from me or use me to do stuff for them at work. No point being bothered by it. At least you’re still a wet hole at your age I take umbrage at that comment. Not sure why. It was a terrible comment I apologise x It was to Outsider actshually. I'm just being a nob cos I'm ancient I know it was haha. I’m apologising for the offence I caused x " She'd probably laugh too | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"People only pretend to like me because I'm a wet hole with big boobs. Or to try and get gossip from me or use me to do stuff for them at work. No point being bothered by it. At least you’re still a wet hole at your age " Barely. But men don't care what they fuck. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"People only pretend to like me because I'm a wet hole with big boobs. Or to try and get gossip from me or use me to do stuff for them at work. No point being bothered by it. At least you’re still a wet hole at your age Barely. But men don't care what they fuck. " I'm not offended. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not to get all philosophical, but what is 'me'? I'm just a sum of my (inner and outer) parts. I guess I'm implicitly accepting the physicalist explanation of mind/consciousness. Anyway, I don't mind at all. I'm happy if they like whatever they do about me. I'd be miserable if I wanted people to like *everything* about me. It'd also contradict something I think and have said before - the only person who can tolerate all of me is myself Rare I come across anyone who considers 'the hard problem' even psychiatrists. What is your view on what consciousness is? A trick the brain plays on itself, when it reaches a certain level of complexity? Your next paragraph made me smile. I think it is a challenge too, accepting oneself; not simply a choice." I'll start off by saying this is how I view the world - it's a philosophical position I resonate with most and there's no right or wrong. It's easier to say what it's not - I don't accept the soul/spiritual aspects from religion(s) and the psychoanalytic conscious/sub-conscious/un-conscious babble from Freud and Jung (it's pseudoscience imo). I prefer the naturalist/physicalist position - consciousness is just the name we've given to the electrical impulses in our brain that make us feel ourselves. And I don't think humans are unique in that - we're just like all other animals, and thus, by extension, they're conscious too. The brain doesn't need to play any tricks, even if we are in a simulation, accepting that we 'exist' is still perfectly valid. Consciousness is just a side effect of brain evolution is what my answer would be I guess. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not to get all philosophical, but what is 'me'? I'm just a sum of my (inner and outer) parts. I guess I'm implicitly accepting the physicalist explanation of mind/consciousness. Anyway, I don't mind at all. I'm happy if they like whatever they do about me. I'd be miserable if I wanted people to like *everything* about me. It'd also contradict something I think and have said before - the only person who can tolerate all of me is myself Rare I come across anyone who considers 'the hard problem' even psychiatrists. What is your view on what consciousness is? A trick the brain plays on itself, when it reaches a certain level of complexity? Your next paragraph made me smile. I think it is a challenge too, accepting oneself; not simply a choice. I'll start off by saying this is how I view the world - it's a philosophical position I resonate with most and there's no right or wrong. It's easier to say what it's not - I don't accept the soul/spiritual aspects from religion(s) and the psychoanalytic conscious/sub-conscious/un-conscious babble from Freud and Jung (it's pseudoscience imo). I prefer the naturalist/physicalist position - consciousness is just the name we've given to the electrical impulses in our brain that make us feel ourselves. And I don't think humans are unique in that - we're just like all other animals, and thus, by extension, they're conscious too. The brain doesn't need to play any tricks, even if we are in a simulation, accepting that we 'exist' is still perfectly valid. Consciousness is just a side effect of brain evolution is what my answer would be I guess." I...erm.. didn't understand any of that. Where's Hansoffate? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not to get all philosophical, but what is 'me'? I'm just a sum of my (inner and outer) parts. I guess I'm implicitly accepting the physicalist explanation of mind/consciousness. Anyway, I don't mind at all. I'm happy if they like whatever they do about me. I'd be miserable if I wanted people to like *everything* about me. It'd also contradict something I think and have said before - the only person who can tolerate all of me is myself Rare I come across anyone who considers 'the hard problem' even psychiatrists. What is your view on what consciousness is? A trick the brain plays on itself, when it reaches a certain level of complexity? Your next paragraph made me smile. I think it is a challenge too, accepting oneself; not simply a choice. I'll start off by saying this is how I view the world - it's a philosophical position I resonate with most and there's no right or wrong. It's easier to say what it's not - I don't accept the soul/spiritual aspects from religion(s) and the psychoanalytic conscious/sub-conscious/un-conscious babble from Freud and Jung (it's pseudoscience imo). I prefer the naturalist/physicalist position - consciousness is just the name we've given to the electrical impulses in our brain that make us feel ourselves. And I don't think humans are unique in that - we're just like all other animals, and thus, by extension, they're conscious too. The brain doesn't need to play any tricks, even if we are in a simulation, accepting that we 'exist' is still perfectly valid. Consciousness is just a side effect of brain evolution is what my answer would be I guess. I...erm.. didn't understand any of that. Where's Hansoffate? " Haha, I'm sorry Sally, I've become accustomed to reading (and I guess using) jargon. The psychoanalytic part - you don't need to understand it - I don't think the people who made it up understood it either! Physicalism is the view that the only things that exist are physical things. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've never bothered if someone likes me or not, I like me which means more than anything x" Me likes you to and me bothered so should be also x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do you want people to like you for you? Or do you mind if they seem to only or mainly like you for a specific feature (hair colour, penis size, body size/ shape, age etc)? I sometimes question myself. I feel like maybe I’m being a bit sensitive and snowflakey. Obviously I snap out of it but I’m keen to hear other perspectives. Particularly of those that don’t really care what someone likes/ desires them for I guess. I’m off work today so doing some thinking. " No. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not to get all philosophical, but what is 'me'? I'm just a sum of my (inner and outer) parts. I guess I'm implicitly accepting the physicalist explanation of mind/consciousness. Anyway, I don't mind at all. I'm happy if they like whatever they do about me. I'd be miserable if I wanted people to like *everything* about me. It'd also contradict something I think and have said before - the only person who can tolerate all of me is myself Rare I come across anyone who considers 'the hard problem' even psychiatrists. What is your view on what consciousness is? A trick the brain plays on itself, when it reaches a certain level of complexity? Your next paragraph made me smile. I think it is a challenge too, accepting oneself; not simply a choice. I'll start off by saying this is how I view the world - it's a philosophical position I resonate with most and there's no right or wrong. It's easier to say what it's not - I don't accept the soul/spiritual aspects from religion(s) and the psychoanalytic conscious/sub-conscious/un-conscious babble from Freud and Jung (it's pseudoscience imo). I prefer the naturalist/physicalist position - consciousness is just the name we've given to the electrical impulses in our brain that make us feel ourselves. And I don't think humans are unique in that - we're just like all other animals, and thus, by extension, they're conscious too. The brain doesn't need to play any tricks, even if we are in a simulation, accepting that we 'exist' is still perfectly valid. Consciousness is just a side effect of brain evolution is what my answer would be I guess. I...erm.. didn't understand any of that. Where's Hansoffate? Haha, I'm sorry Sally, I've become accustomed to reading (and I guess using) jargon. The psychoanalytic part - you don't need to understand it - I don't think the people who made it up understood it either! Physicalism is the view that the only things that exist are physical things." As long as you and Hans understand! I will admit defeat. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not to get all philosophical, but what is 'me'? I'm just a sum of my (inner and outer) parts. I guess I'm implicitly accepting the physicalist explanation of mind/consciousness. Anyway, I don't mind at all. I'm happy if they like whatever they do about me. I'd be miserable if I wanted people to like *everything* about me. It'd also contradict something I think and have said before - the only person who can tolerate all of me is myself Rare I come across anyone who considers 'the hard problem' even psychiatrists. What is your view on what consciousness is? A trick the brain plays on itself, when it reaches a certain level of complexity? Your next paragraph made me smile. I think it is a challenge too, accepting oneself; not simply a choice. I'll start off by saying this is how I view the world - it's a philosophical position I resonate with most and there's no right or wrong. It's easier to say what it's not - I don't accept the soul/spiritual aspects from religion(s) and the psychoanalytic conscious/sub-conscious/un-conscious babble from Freud and Jung (it's pseudoscience imo). I prefer the naturalist/physicalist position - consciousness is just the name we've given to the electrical impulses in our brain that make us feel ourselves. And I don't think humans are unique in that - we're just like all other animals, and thus, by extension, they're conscious too. The brain doesn't need to play any tricks, even if we are in a simulation, accepting that we 'exist' is still perfectly valid. Consciousness is just a side effect of brain evolution is what my answer would be I guess. I...erm.. didn't understand any of that. Where's Hansoffate? Haha, I'm sorry Sally, I've become accustomed to reading (and I guess using) jargon. The psychoanalytic part - you don't need to understand it - I don't think the people who made it up understood it either! Physicalism is the view that the only things that exist are physical things. As long as you and Hans understand! I will admit defeat. " No, please don't! Help me get better at communicating - is there something that's still unclear? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not to get all philosophical, but what is 'me'? I'm just a sum of my (inner and outer) parts. I guess I'm implicitly accepting the physicalist explanation of mind/consciousness. Anyway, I don't mind at all. I'm happy if they like whatever they do about me. I'd be miserable if I wanted people to like *everything* about me. It'd also contradict something I think and have said before - the only person who can tolerate all of me is myself Rare I come across anyone who considers 'the hard problem' even psychiatrists. What is your view on what consciousness is? A trick the brain plays on itself, when it reaches a certain level of complexity? Your next paragraph made me smile. I think it is a challenge too, accepting oneself; not simply a choice. I'll start off by saying this is how I view the world - it's a philosophical position I resonate with most and there's no right or wrong. It's easier to say what it's not - I don't accept the soul/spiritual aspects from religion(s) and the psychoanalytic conscious/sub-conscious/un-conscious babble from Freud and Jung (it's pseudoscience imo). I prefer the naturalist/physicalist position - consciousness is just the name we've given to the electrical impulses in our brain that make us feel ourselves. And I don't think humans are unique in that - we're just like all other animals, and thus, by extension, they're conscious too. The brain doesn't need to play any tricks, even if we are in a simulation, accepting that we 'exist' is still perfectly valid. Consciousness is just a side effect of brain evolution is what my answer would be I guess." I appreciate you making that initial statement. Hopefully, it also resonates for you when I say: I am quite happy to accept there are multiple viable world views. 'Resonate' does suggest perhaps that your choice is based on both critical analysis and what you feel to be true - or perhaps: an acknowledgement of your own cognitive bias? I have a few questions, which are explorative rather than challenging. I am not sure it will be apreciate having an in depth discusion on the thread though, so perhaps if you wish to continue we could DM? One question would be: In your view, at what point would an organism become conscious? I have no issue with defining consciousness a -side effct- rather than a trick. My thoughts around it being a trick are more to do with the cartesian duality that is still prevalent - even within Psychiatry- of the mind being something immaterial; separate from the brain. It is often cited as the reason why Mental health is considered to be something separate from physical health. I think if I recall it is also a Daniel Dennet quote. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not to get all philosophical, but what is 'me'? I'm just a sum of my (inner and outer) parts. I guess I'm implicitly accepting the physicalist explanation of mind/consciousness. Anyway, I don't mind at all. I'm happy if they like whatever they do about me. I'd be miserable if I wanted people to like *everything* about me. It'd also contradict something I think and have said before - the only person who can tolerate all of me is myself Rare I come across anyone who considers 'the hard problem' even psychiatrists. What is your view on what consciousness is? A trick the brain plays on itself, when it reaches a certain level of complexity? Your next paragraph made me smile. I think it is a challenge too, accepting oneself; not simply a choice. I'll start off by saying this is how I view the world - it's a philosophical position I resonate with most and there's no right or wrong. It's easier to say what it's not - I don't accept the soul/spiritual aspects from religion(s) and the psychoanalytic conscious/sub-conscious/un-conscious babble from Freud and Jung (it's pseudoscience imo). I prefer the naturalist/physicalist position - consciousness is just the name we've given to the electrical impulses in our brain that make us feel ourselves. And I don't think humans are unique in that - we're just like all other animals, and thus, by extension, they're conscious too. The brain doesn't need to play any tricks, even if we are in a simulation, accepting that we 'exist' is still perfectly valid. Consciousness is just a side effect of brain evolution is what my answer would be I guess. I...erm.. didn't understand any of that. Where's Hansoffate? Haha, I'm sorry Sally, I've become accustomed to reading (and I guess using) jargon. The psychoanalytic part - you don't need to understand it - I don't think the people who made it up understood it either! Physicalism is the view that the only things that exist are physical things. As long as you and Hans understand! I will admit defeat. No, please don't! Help me get better at communicating - is there something that's still unclear?" Don't worry about it on my account. Hans knows I don't always understand what he's talking about either. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not to get all philosophical, but what is 'me'? I'm just a sum of my (inner and outer) parts. I guess I'm implicitly accepting the physicalist explanation of mind/consciousness. Anyway, I don't mind at all. I'm happy if they like whatever they do about me. I'd be miserable if I wanted people to like *everything* about me. It'd also contradict something I think and have said before - the only person who can tolerate all of me is myself Rare I come across anyone who considers 'the hard problem' even psychiatrists. What is your view on what consciousness is? A trick the brain plays on itself, when it reaches a certain level of complexity? Your next paragraph made me smile. I think it is a challenge too, accepting oneself; not simply a choice. I'll start off by saying this is how I view the world - it's a philosophical position I resonate with most and there's no right or wrong. It's easier to say what it's not - I don't accept the soul/spiritual aspects from religion(s) and the psychoanalytic conscious/sub-conscious/un-conscious babble from Freud and Jung (it's pseudoscience imo). I prefer the naturalist/physicalist position - consciousness is just the name we've given to the electrical impulses in our brain that make us feel ourselves. And I don't think humans are unique in that - we're just like all other animals, and thus, by extension, they're conscious too. The brain doesn't need to play any tricks, even if we are in a simulation, accepting that we 'exist' is still perfectly valid. Consciousness is just a side effect of brain evolution is what my answer would be I guess. I...erm.. didn't understand any of that. Where's Hansoffate? Haha, I'm sorry Sally, I've become accustomed to reading (and I guess using) jargon. The psychoanalytic part - you don't need to understand it - I don't think the people who made it up understood it either! Physicalism is the view that the only things that exist are physical things. As long as you and Hans understand! I will admit defeat. No, please don't! Help me get better at communicating - is there something that's still unclear? Don't worry about it on my account. Hans knows I don't always understand what he's talking about either. " Okay, you'll be spared of further SEP-speak in this thread then | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not to get all philosophical, but what is 'me'? I'm just a sum of my (inner and outer) parts. I guess I'm implicitly accepting the physicalist explanation of mind/consciousness. Anyway, I don't mind at all. I'm happy if they like whatever they do about me. I'd be miserable if I wanted people to like *everything* about me. It'd also contradict something I think and have said before - the only person who can tolerate all of me is myself Rare I come across anyone who considers 'the hard problem' even psychiatrists. What is your view on what consciousness is? A trick the brain plays on itself, when it reaches a certain level of complexity? Your next paragraph made me smile. I think it is a challenge too, accepting oneself; not simply a choice. I'll start off by saying this is how I view the world - it's a philosophical position I resonate with most and there's no right or wrong. It's easier to say what it's not - I don't accept the soul/spiritual aspects from religion(s) and the psychoanalytic conscious/sub-conscious/un-conscious babble from Freud and Jung (it's pseudoscience imo). I prefer the naturalist/physicalist position - consciousness is just the name we've given to the electrical impulses in our brain that make us feel ourselves. And I don't think humans are unique in that - we're just like all other animals, and thus, by extension, they're conscious too. The brain doesn't need to play any tricks, even if we are in a simulation, accepting that we 'exist' is still perfectly valid. Consciousness is just a side effect of brain evolution is what my answer would be I guess. I...erm.. didn't understand any of that. Where's Hansoffate? Haha, I'm sorry Sally, I've become accustomed to reading (and I guess using) jargon. The psychoanalytic part - you don't need to understand it - I don't think the people who made it up understood it either! Physicalism is the view that the only things that exist are physical things. As long as you and Hans understand! I will admit defeat. No, please don't! Help me get better at communicating - is there something that's still unclear? Don't worry about it on my account. Hans knows I don't always understand what he's talking about either. " Let's not pretend I always know what I am talking about. It is certainly not an opinion I hold about myself. I am just interested in weird shit. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not to get all philosophical, but what is 'me'? I'm just a sum of my (inner and outer) parts. I guess I'm implicitly accepting the physicalist explanation of mind/consciousness. Anyway, I don't mind at all. I'm happy if they like whatever they do about me. I'd be miserable if I wanted people to like *everything* about me. It'd also contradict something I think and have said before - the only person who can tolerate all of me is myself Rare I come across anyone who considers 'the hard problem' even psychiatrists. What is your view on what consciousness is? A trick the brain plays on itself, when it reaches a certain level of complexity? Your next paragraph made me smile. I think it is a challenge too, accepting oneself; not simply a choice. I'll start off by saying this is how I view the world - it's a philosophical position I resonate with most and there's no right or wrong. It's easier to say what it's not - I don't accept the soul/spiritual aspects from religion(s) and the psychoanalytic conscious/sub-conscious/un-conscious babble from Freud and Jung (it's pseudoscience imo). I prefer the naturalist/physicalist position - consciousness is just the name we've given to the electrical impulses in our brain that make us feel ourselves. And I don't think humans are unique in that - we're just like all other animals, and thus, by extension, they're conscious too. The brain doesn't need to play any tricks, even if we are in a simulation, accepting that we 'exist' is still perfectly valid. Consciousness is just a side effect of brain evolution is what my answer would be I guess. I...erm.. didn't understand any of that. Where's Hansoffate? Haha, I'm sorry Sally, I've become accustomed to reading (and I guess using) jargon. The psychoanalytic part - you don't need to understand it - I don't think the people who made it up understood it either! Physicalism is the view that the only things that exist are physical things. As long as you and Hans understand! I will admit defeat. No, please don't! Help me get better at communicating - is there something that's still unclear? Don't worry about it on my account. Hans knows I don't always understand what he's talking about either. Okay, you'll be spared of further SEP-speak in this thread then " I need a lie down now... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m like marmite, some people love me and others hate me. I honestly don’t care either way what people think. If there’s only one or two attributes they do like about me it’s usually a fairly mutual feeling " That’s so rude | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do you want people to like you for you? Or do you mind if they seem to only or mainly like you for a specific feature (hair colour, penis size, body size/ shape, age etc)? I sometimes question myself. I feel like maybe I’m being a bit sensitive and snowflakey. Obviously I snap out of it but I’m keen to hear other perspectives. Particularly of those that don’t really care what someone likes/ desires them for I guess. I’m off work today so doing some thinking. " Is this just a question about if people like you for sexual reasons or also for general reasons? Such as if person A was spreading (possibly untrue) gossip about person B and person B wasn't aware and didn't know why people were being off with them. For example. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do you want people to like you for you? Or do you mind if they seem to only or mainly like you for a specific feature (hair colour, penis size, body size/ shape, age etc)? I sometimes question myself. I feel like maybe I’m being a bit sensitive and snowflakey. Obviously I snap out of it but I’m keen to hear other perspectives. Particularly of those that don’t really care what someone likes/ desires them for I guess. I’m off work today so doing some thinking. Is this just a question about if people like you for sexual reasons or also for general reasons? Such as if person A was spreading (possibly untrue) gossip about person B and person B wasn't aware and didn't know why people were being off with them. For example." No hahaha. This is about if people like you because they find you overall genuinely attractive physically or mentally whatever. Or if they only like you because you’re an older woman or you’ve got a 9 inch black cock or if you are a ‘bbw’ etc. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do you want people to like you for you? Or do you mind if they seem to only or mainly like you for a specific feature (hair colour, penis size, body size/ shape, age etc)? I sometimes question myself. I feel like maybe I’m being a bit sensitive and snowflakey. Obviously I snap out of it but I’m keen to hear other perspectives. Particularly of those that don’t really care what someone likes/ desires them for I guess. I’m off work today so doing some thinking. Is this just a question about if people like you for sexual reasons or also for general reasons? Such as if person A was spreading (possibly untrue) gossip about person B and person B wasn't aware and didn't know why people were being off with them. For example. No hahaha. This is about if people like you because they find you overall genuinely attractive physically or mentally whatever. Or if they only like you because you’re an older woman or you’ve got a 9 inch black cock or if you are a ‘bbw’ etc. " and also does it bother you is the question I think. Does it matter to you what someone likes you for | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do you want people to like you for you? Or do you mind if they seem to only or mainly like you for a specific feature (hair colour, penis size, body size/ shape, age etc)? " The phrase couldn’t give a rats arse applies to me darling. Because if they don’t then that’s all good by me. I’m still going to be me | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do you want people to like you for you? Or do you mind if they seem to only or mainly like you for a specific feature (hair colour, penis size, body size/ shape, age etc)? The phrase couldn’t give a rats arse applies to me darling. Because if they don’t then that’s all good by me. I’m still going to be me " I only like you because you’re a cougar. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do you want people to like you for you? Or do you mind if they seem to only or mainly like you for a specific feature (hair colour, penis size, body size/ shape, age etc)? The phrase couldn’t give a rats arse applies to me darling. Because if they don’t then that’s all good by me. I’m still going to be me I only like you because you’re a cougar. " Do you? That’s good by me. I’m a teeny tiny cougar | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do you want people to like you for you? Or do you mind if they seem to only or mainly like you for a specific feature (hair colour, penis size, body size/ shape, age etc)? The phrase couldn’t give a rats arse applies to me darling. Because if they don’t then that’s all good by me. I’m still going to be me I only like you because you’re a cougar. Do you? That’s good by me. I’m a teeny tiny cougar " I am not telling you what I like about you, that’s moist | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do you want people to like you for you? Or do you mind if they seem to only or mainly like you for a specific feature (hair colour, penis size, body size/ shape, age etc)? The phrase couldn’t give a rats arse applies to me darling. Because if they don’t then that’s all good by me. I’m still going to be me I only like you because you’re a cougar. Do you? That’s good by me. I’m a teeny tiny cougar I am not telling you what I like about you, that’s moist " Is it moist already? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do you want people to like you for you? Or do you mind if they seem to only or mainly like you for a specific feature (hair colour, penis size, body size/ shape, age etc)? The phrase couldn’t give a rats arse applies to me darling. Because if they don’t then that’s all good by me. I’m still going to be me I only like you because you’re a cougar. Do you? That’s good by me. I’m a teeny tiny cougar I am not telling you what I like about you, that’s moist Is it moist already? " I’ve been told not to answer that | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do you want people to like you for you? Or do you mind if they seem to only or mainly like you for a specific feature (hair colour, penis size, body size/ shape, age etc)? The phrase couldn’t give a rats arse applies to me darling. Because if they don’t then that’s all good by me. I’m still going to be me I only like you because you’re a cougar. Do you? That’s good by me. I’m a teeny tiny cougar I am not telling you what I like about you, that’s moist Is it moist already? I’ve been told not to answer that " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do you want people to like you for you? Or do you mind if they seem to only or mainly like you for a specific feature (hair colour, penis size, body size/ shape, age etc)? I sometimes question myself. I feel like maybe I’m being a bit sensitive and snowflakey. Obviously I snap out of it but I’m keen to hear other perspectives. Particularly of those that don’t really care what someone likes/ desires them for I guess. I’m off work today so doing some thinking. Is this just a question about if people like you for sexual reasons or also for general reasons? Such as if person A was spreading (possibly untrue) gossip about person B and person B wasn't aware and didn't know why people were being off with them. For example. No hahaha. This is about if people like you because they find you overall genuinely attractive physically or mentally whatever. Or if they only like you because you’re an older woman or you’ve got a 9 inch black cock or if you are a ‘bbw’ etc. and also does it bother you is the question I think. Does it matter to you what someone likes you for" Suppose it depends on if they reveal what box I'm ticking. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It definitely helps if people don't hate you I find. pt" I’ve never had sex with someone that hates me. Yet. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I want people to like me for me. I know I provide great entertainment though so it's unlikely people won't like me. F" I like you. You’re nice | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I want people to like me for me. I know I provide great entertainment though so it's unlikely people won't like me. F I like you. You’re nice" She hasn't let you see the otherside of her | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I want people to like me for me. I know I provide great entertainment though so it's unlikely people won't like me. F I like you. You’re nice She hasn't let you see the otherside of her " The side you’ll be seeing tonight | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"On here I assume that any attraction initially is going to be physical and therefore somewhat superficial. If it's someone I'm meeting more than once I like to think that I do more than tick a box for them. But for one offs that really doesn't bother me in the slightest as I'm probably doing the same. " There’s definitely a physical attraction here. Yep. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |