Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You want to look up your own thread and can't remember the sodding title of it? " . Was it involving being shit in a cupboard? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You want to look up your own thread and can't remember the sodding title of it? . Was it involving being shit in a cupboard?" *Shut | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You want to look up your own thread and can't remember the sodding title of it?" • Was it called "Berate My Cock"? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"https://m.fabswingers.com/forum/lounge/1471963" Thank you!!!! What would I do without you Nero. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You want to look up your own thread and can't remember the sodding title of it? " I know it's a huge pain replying to some OP's when over half the words of their post are in their unseeable title! Seriously though, people need to cut down on this bate and hook method of titling imo. It's been used for some more serious threads of late, just out of force of habit I think. It can be an accidental wind-up for some fabbers though I feel - not everyone wants to just land in certain subjects. It can somewhat trivialise threads we intended to be more earnest too I think. pt | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You want to look up your own thread and can't remember the sodding title of it? I know it's a huge pain replying to some OP's when over half the words of their post are in their unseeable title! Seriously though, people need to cut down on this bate and hook method of titling imo. It's been used for some more serious threads of late, just out of force of habit I think. It can be an accidental wind-up for some fabbers though I feel - not everyone wants to just land in certain subjects. It can somewhat trivialise threads we intended to be more earnest too I think. pt" Oh well if they don’t like it they don’t have to click on it do they they could just scroll past instead of getting the arse with everyone | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You want to look up your own thread and can't remember the sodding title of it? I know it's a huge pain replying to some OP's when over half the words of their post are in their unseeable title! Seriously though, people need to cut down on this bate and hook method of titling imo. It's been used for some more serious threads of late, just out of force of habit I think. It can be an accidental wind-up for some fabbers though I feel - not everyone wants to just land in certain subjects. It can somewhat trivialise threads we intended to be more earnest too I think. pt Oh well if they don’t like it they don’t have to click on it do they they could just scroll past instead of getting the arse with everyone " Now where would the fun be in that? All I have to say to those that dislike Clickbait is Too bad, so sad | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You want to look up your own thread and can't remember the sodding title of it? I know it's a huge pain replying to some OP's when over half the words of their post are in their unseeable title! Seriously though, people need to cut down on this bate and hook method of titling imo. It's been used for some more serious threads of late, just out of force of habit I think. It can be an accidental wind-up for some fabbers though I feel - not everyone wants to just land in certain subjects. It can somewhat trivialise threads we intended to be more earnest too I think. pt Oh well if they don’t like it they don’t have to click on it do they they could just scroll past instead of getting the arse with everyone " Some Ppl aren't picky about what arses they upset.... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You want to look up your own thread and can't remember the sodding title of it?" You did a thread? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You want to look up your own thread and can't remember the sodding title of it? " All the time! Though I very rarely have need to actually look for them because they are mostly pointless, actually very pointless. And so few respond to them. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I thought looking up threads was illegal " How else are you gonna bump them | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You want to look up your own thread and can't remember the sodding title of it? I know it's a huge pain replying to some OP's when over half the words of their post are in their unseeable title! Seriously though, people need to cut down on this bate and hook method of titling imo. It's been used for some more serious threads of late, just out of force of habit I think. It can be an accidental wind-up for some fabbers though I feel - not everyone wants to just land in certain subjects. It can somewhat trivialise threads we intended to be more earnest too I think. pt Oh well if they don’t like it they don’t have to click on it do they they could just scroll past instead of getting the arse with everyone " You mean click out of it? It probably makes no odds at the end of the day. It does become force of habit though I think, threading this way. pt | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I thought looking up threads was illegal How else are you gonna bump them " In a kind, inoffensive way | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You want to look up your own thread and can't remember the sodding title of it? I know it's a huge pain replying to some OP's when over half the words of their post are in their unseeable title! Seriously though, people need to cut down on this bate and hook method of titling imo. It's been used for some more serious threads of late, just out of force of habit I think. It can be an accidental wind-up for some fabbers though I feel - not everyone wants to just land in certain subjects. It can somewhat trivialise threads we intended to be more earnest too I think. pt Oh well if they don’t like it they don’t have to click on it do they they could just scroll past instead of getting the arse with everyone Some Ppl aren't picky about what arses they upset.... " Just a note to a certain user. I can't block you from the forum so leave off unless you actually have something to say please? Just refer to something (anything, as long as it's there) - ie in future. Honestly, it's in the rules. pt | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You want to look up your own thread and can't remember the sodding title of it? I know it's a huge pain replying to some OP's when over half the words of their post are in their unseeable title! Seriously though, people need to cut down on this bate and hook method of titling imo. It's been used for some more serious threads of late, just out of force of habit I think. It can be an accidental wind-up for some fabbers though I feel - not everyone wants to just land in certain subjects. It can somewhat trivialise threads we intended to be more earnest too I think. pt" It's such a pain when you click on a "what chocolate thread" and it turns out someone shit the bed | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You want to look up your own thread and can't remember the sodding title of it? I know it's a huge pain replying to some OP's when over half the words of their post are in their unseeable title! Seriously though, people need to cut down on this bate and hook method of titling imo. It's been used for some more serious threads of late, just out of force of habit I think. It can be an accidental wind-up for some fabbers though I feel - not everyone wants to just land in certain subjects. It can somewhat trivialise threads we intended to be more earnest too I think. pt Oh well if they don’t like it they don’t have to click on it do they they could just scroll past instead of getting the arse with everyone Some Ppl aren't picky about what arses they upset.... Just a note to a certain user. I can't block you from the forum so leave off unless you actually have something to say please? Just refer to something (anything, as long as it's there) - ie in future. Honestly, it's in the rules. pt" Think he was talking to me pet | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You want to look up your own thread and can't remember the sodding title of it? I know it's a huge pain replying to some OP's when over half the words of their post are in their unseeable title! Seriously though, people need to cut down on this bate and hook method of titling imo. It's been used for some more serious threads of late, just out of force of habit I think. It can be an accidental wind-up for some fabbers though I feel - not everyone wants to just land in certain subjects. It can somewhat trivialise threads we intended to be more earnest too I think. pt Oh well if they don’t like it they don’t have to click on it do they they could just scroll past instead of getting the arse with everyone Some Ppl aren't picky about what arses they upset.... Just a note to a certain user. I can't block you from the forum so leave off unless you actually have something to say please? Just refer to something (anything, as long as it's there) - ie in future. Honestly, it's in the rules. pt Think he was talking to me pet " I was talking to you Fluffy | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You want to look up your own thread and can't remember the sodding title of it? You did a thread? " Do I need to do more? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You want to look up your own thread and can't remember the sodding title of it? I know it's a huge pain replying to some OP's when over half the words of their post are in their unseeable title! Seriously though, people need to cut down on this bate and hook method of titling imo. It's been used for some more serious threads of late, just out of force of habit I think. It can be an accidental wind-up for some fabbers though I feel - not everyone wants to just land in certain subjects. It can somewhat trivialise threads we intended to be more earnest too I think. pt" Sorry if I upset you, wasn't my intention. I'll try think of something much more interesting soon | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You want to look up your own thread and can't remember the sodding title of it? I know it's a huge pain replying to some OP's when over half the words of their post are in their unseeable title! Seriously though, people need to cut down on this bate and hook method of titling imo. It's been used for some more serious threads of late, just out of force of habit I think. It can be an accidental wind-up for some fabbers though I feel - not everyone wants to just land in certain subjects. It can somewhat trivialise threads we intended to be more earnest too I think. pt Sorry if I upset you, wasn't my intention. I'll try think of something much more interesting soon " Comedy threads are always welcome! Interesting is what I don't really want as click bait I guess. pt | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You want to look up your own thread and can't remember the sodding title of it? I know it's a huge pain replying to some OP's when over half the words of their post are in their unseeable title! Seriously though, people need to cut down on this bate and hook method of titling imo. It's been used for some more serious threads of late, just out of force of habit I think. It can be an accidental wind-up for some fabbers though I feel - not everyone wants to just land in certain subjects. It can somewhat trivialise threads we intended to be more earnest too I think. pt Oh well if they don’t like it they don’t have to click on it do they they could just scroll past instead of getting the arse with everyone Some Ppl aren't picky about what arses they upset.... Just a note to a certain user. I can't block you from the forum so leave off unless you actually have something to say please? Just refer to something (anything, as long as it's there) - ie in future. Honestly, it's in the rules. pt Think he was talking to me pet I was talking to you Fluffy " . Well that's too 'in' or clever for me then I'm afraid. It felt like I was being called an arse either way as there was only Fluffy and myself in the post. Context, please. pt | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |