Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Only 12th level intellects for me please "Haha haven't heard that reference in a while. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Is it necessary to state on a profile I can not say as it’s every individuals prerogative I guess, HOWEVER, I doubt any intelligence can be quantified without some sort of IQ test so that’ll make for an interesting first meet | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bright enough to give informed consent" Gillick Principles and Fraser Guidelines... Important I guess given context of FabSwingers... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I demand nothing less than genius level! ….or failing that, at least the presence of a discernible pulse." What about opposable thumbs, that always seems important to me  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I demand nothing less than genius level! ….or failing that, at least the presence of a discernible pulse. What about opposable thumbs, that always seems important to me "Thumbs indeed have their uses….   | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Though I am only the holder of a bachelors degree, I expect ask my partners to have at least attempted a PHD. Or else what will we talk about?" Now Mr Pickle, I have always assumed that on a meet you will talk continuously (no idea why I assumed this, think maybe the number of threads you start) and so like me the partner may never get a look in, and consequently your partner need not display the lack of a Phd, since, even a fool is considered wise if (s)he keeps silent | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Though I am only the holder of a bachelors degree, I expect ask my partners to have at least attempted a PHD. Or else what will we talk about? Now Mr Pickle, I have always assumed that on a meet you will talk continuously (no idea why I assumed this, think maybe the number of threads you start) and so like me the partner may never get a look in, and consequently your partner need not display the lack of a Phd, since, even a fool is considered wise if (s)he keeps silent" No PHD place, no Pickle. You’re obviously completely wrong about me. I’m an excellent, attentive and inquisitive date. I mostly actually like the people I’m dating though. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Though I am only the holder of a bachelors degree, I expect ask my partners to have at least attempted a PHD. Or else what will we talk about?" Bachelor? I thought you had a girlfriend  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Though I am only the holder of a bachelors degree, I expect ask my partners to have at least attempted a PHD. Or else what will we talk about?" PhD in what though? I'm highly intelligent in my field of expertise, absolute Muppet when it comes to physics  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Though I am only the holder of a bachelors degree, I expect ask my partners to have at least attempted a PHD. Or else what will we talk about? Bachelor? I thought you had a girlfriend "no. I have a fiancé. No girlfriends anymore. They all broke up with me 
Wanna be one? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Though I am only the holder of a bachelors degree, I expect ask my partners to have at least attempted a PHD. Or else what will we talk about? PhD in what though? I'm highly intelligent in my field of expertise, absolute Muppet when it comes to physics "Are you any good at biology? PHD in anything. Except economics. I hate economics students. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Though I am only the holder of a bachelors degree, I expect ask my partners to have at least attempted a PHD. Or else what will we talk about? Bachelor? I thought you had a girlfriend "Bachelor degree is another name for undergraduate degree. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyways to answer the OP, I'm not sexually attracted to intelligence. I've yet to come across anyone I thought phwor the brains on them. But I do find intelligence to be important for the maintenance of a relationship. But intelligence to me will vary to what someone else's definition of intelligence is. " What are you sexually attracted to then? *gets notebook out* | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I try my level best to avoid those profiles. Those who are truly sapiosexual don't need to state that they're sapiosexual on their profile. It's a 'hook' term." I hear you. (But if they’re particularly hot I can ignore it.) | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I try my level best to avoid those profiles. Those who are truly sapiosexual don't need to state that they're sapiosexual on their profile. It's a 'hook' term." Absolutely. It is grossly simplistic - ignoring questions about what is intelligence, how are various types of intelligence expressed or assessed, who is qualified to make those decisions blah blah - and is just be a term of egotistical onanism by the user. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I try my level best to avoid those profiles. Those who are truly sapiosexual don't need to state that they're sapiosexual on their profile. It's a 'hook' term. · I hear you. (But if they’re particularly hot I can ignore it.)" • I see your point but I just can't bring myself to having sex with a good looking dullard. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think it's just another trendy term in all honesty. And that's fine. Maybe they mean they like engaging conversation? Maybe they are genuinely turned on by intelligence and value it over looks. It's an admittedly dull descriptor and sometimes I do find myself thinking 'are you?' but fuck it. It goes along with using authentic, nice people etc etc. They're not saying they're intelligent - they could be as thick as pig's poo and still get a stiffy/wide on when they see displays of intelligence. " Don't see a lot of people here getting horny about displays of intelligence to be fair. Usually a baser reason | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I try my level best to avoid those profiles. Those who are truly sapiosexual don't need to state that they're sapiosexual on their profile. It's a 'hook' term. · I hear you. (But if they’re particularly hot I can ignore it.) • I see your point but I just can't bring myself to having sex with a good looking dullard.
"Anyone who actually falls for your constant conflation of delightfulness and intelligence is helplessly pandering to your fetish for coquettish naivety. Or maybe its all in the shoes. pt | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
To spontaneously make a joke that peels off in layers of belly laughter. And you are elated with that omg that's so true!
These are all forms of intelligence, in my eyes and all can turn me on. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think it's just another trendy term in all honesty. And that's fine. Maybe they mean they like engaging conversation? Maybe they are genuinely turned on by intelligence and value it over looks. It's an admittedly dull descriptor and sometimes I do find myself thinking 'are you?' but fuck it. It goes along with using authentic, nice people etc etc. They're not saying they're intelligent - they could be as thick as pig's poo and still get a stiffy/wide on when they see displays of intelligence. " There's a very strong likelihood that a self advertised sapiosexual is thick as mince. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sapiosexual is a very personal thing. I clad myself as one, but I don’t require a partner to have a degree before I meet them, just that they can engage in substantive, meaningful conversation about things other than sex. Politics, current affairs, literature etc. And preferably avoid text speak or bad grammar To some it may be an ‘Ick’ or a red flag but that’s ok - horses for courses. "Exactly this!!! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is sapiosexual to be added to the 'list' along with 'professional'? " Yep! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Someone I can share discourse on quantum mechanics." And I'm out | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sapiosexual is a very personal thing. I clad myself as one, but I don’t require a partner to have a degree before I meet them, just that they can engage in substantive, meaningful conversation about things other than sex. Politics, current affairs, literature etc. And preferably avoid text speak or bad grammar To some it may be an ‘Ick’ or a red flag but that’s ok - horses for courses. "I think most people here would run from that as you've acknowledged. But not all of us want meaningless bonks. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This site is so unwelcoming sometimes it really is. If you're not interested in a profile, why can't it be just that - a zero interest profile? It doesn't have to be a red flag or anything daft like that. How does that feel to people reading this stuff (ie the majority of people who will never want to post here). Sexuality in terms of representation has exploded in recent years. It is FAR from a binary thing, whatever the majority traits are. I think we'll reach extinction before people get to grips with it honestly I do. It's like there is no interest in understanding it. pt" Don't understand your issue. No interest in understanding what? It's a word. It sounds a bit pretentious. So what? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does an `ology count?" Depends on the letters before haha | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This site is so unwelcoming sometimes it really is. If you're not interested in a profile, why can't it be just that - a zero interest profile? It doesn't have to be a red flag or anything daft like that. How does that feel to people reading this stuff (ie the majority of people who will never want to post here). Sexuality in terms of representation has exploded in recent years. It is FAR from a binary thing, whatever the majority traits are. I think we'll reach extinction before people get to grips with it honestly I do. It's like there is no interest in understanding it. pt Don't understand your issue. No interest in understanding what? It's a word. It sounds a bit pretentious. So what? " I'm partly taking up the general view here of what a lot of people generally think perhaps.. I'm just saying it's a genuine sexuality to many people (who could be reading), not actually 'just a word'. And it does seem that understanding things often matters least to me sometimes, which is why I get so negative about things in general sometimes. pt | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is sapiosexual to be added to the 'list' along with 'professional'? Yep!" Good to know. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They need to say "Hi, wanna fuck" in at least 7 languages. "Hola, quisieras coger? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This site is so unwelcoming sometimes it really is. If you're not interested in a profile, why can't it be just that - a zero interest profile? It doesn't have to be a red flag or anything daft like that. How does that feel to people reading this stuff (ie the majority of people who will never want to post here). Sexuality in terms of representation has exploded in recent years. It is FAR from a binary thing, whatever the majority traits are. I think we'll reach extinction before people get to grips with it honestly I do. It's like there is no interest in understanding it. pt Don't understand your issue. No interest in understanding what? It's a word. It sounds a bit pretentious. So what? I'm partly taking up the general view here of what a lot of people generally think perhaps.. I'm just saying it's a genuine sexuality to many people (who could be reading), not actually 'just a word'. And it does seem that understanding things often matters least to me sometimes, which is why I get so negative about things in general sometimes. pt" It's your choice to react as you do. And fwiw I don't think people have an issue with needing to be attracted to someone's mind - the word Sapiosexual is somewhat pretentious and not all of us need to label our sexuality in that way. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They need to say "Hi, wanna fuck" in at least 7 languages.
Hola, quisieras coger? "Ooh, fancy  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
If you can answer a simple question with any degree of grammatical success then you pass grade 2
If you know their from there - grade 3 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This site is so unwelcoming sometimes it really is. If you're not interested in a profile, why can't it be just that - a zero interest profile? It doesn't have to be a red flag or anything daft like that. How does that feel to people reading this stuff (ie the majority of people who will never want to post here). Sexuality in terms of representation has exploded in recent years. It is FAR from a binary thing, whatever the majority traits are. I think we'll reach extinction before people get to grips with it honestly I do. It's like there is no interest in understanding it. pt Don't understand your issue. No interest in understanding what? It's a word. It sounds a bit pretentious. So what? I'm partly taking up the general view here of what a lot of people generally think perhaps.. I'm just saying it's a genuine sexuality to many people (who could be reading), not actually 'just a word'. And it does seem that understanding things often matters least to me sometimes, which is why I get so negative about things in general sometimes. pt It's your choice to react as you do. And fwiw I don't think people have an issue with needing to be attracted to someone's mind - the word Sapiosexual is somewhat pretentious and not all of us need to label our sexuality in that way. " -Most of these type of terms sound like this, so what can you do? Blame the Greeks. I don't see why this has to be inherently pretentious in any way. It could only be pretentious per example in my view. Sapiosexuality involves having to go that route all the time - to the point where the mind is the only sexual attraction that some sapiosexuals have. That's *why* it has the type of name it has. It's not just a fancy way of saying you find intelligence sexy! A lot of people feel like that! There are plenty of forum and groups (even dating sites) for people with this type of sexuality of course, but they are entitled to be on Fab too without any kind of criticism hanging over them. Obviously nobody is asking anyone to use a term that doesn't properly apply to them (or even forcing anything at all). To me it just sounds like people with some similarities are needlessly worrying the term is being pushed on them, or that people are somehow lording over them - or being pretentious or whatever - but modern life seems full of such needless worries to me. To some people the term simply applies. pt | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I consider it more as a brag by the poster, who considers themselves intellectually above the majority of the population and feel the need to point it out. Don't get me wrong, we all have our own level and preferences, I for one dislike "text speak " , but I don't have to brag about it. I can filter them out without condescending everyone. " Honestly, it's not a brag it's just a thing. Pass by if it doesn't attract you yourself. pt | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I prefer worldly knowledge gained from life experiences, working, and adventures rather than academically knowledge. I once dated (briefly) an Actuary, and I was well out of my depth
"As long as people know that sapiosexuality doesn't have to have anything to do with academic knowledge. Nor do sapiosexuals actually have to be particularly intelligent or even looking for the same! pt | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think it's just another trendy term in all honesty. And that's fine. Maybe they mean they like engaging conversation? Maybe they are genuinely turned on by intelligence and value it over looks. It's an admittedly dull descriptor and sometimes I do find myself thinking 'are you?' but fuck it. It goes along with using authentic, nice people etc etc. They're not saying they're intelligent - they could be as thick as pig's poo and still get a stiffy/wide on when they see displays of intelligence. There's a very strong likelihood that a self advertised sapiosexual is thick as mince." Why? Even if they are they can still be sapiosexual. It’s being attracted to intelligence, not being intelligent yourself. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This site is so unwelcoming sometimes it really is. If you're not interested in a profile, why can't it be just that - a zero interest profile? It doesn't have to be a red flag or anything daft like that. How does that feel to people reading this stuff (ie the majority of people who will never want to post here). Sexuality in terms of representation has exploded in recent years. It is FAR from a binary thing, whatever the majority traits are. I think we'll reach extinction before people get to grips with it honestly I do. It's like there is no interest in understanding it. pt Don't understand your issue. No interest in understanding what? It's a word. It sounds a bit pretentious. So what? I'm partly taking up the general view here of what a lot of people generally think perhaps.. I'm just saying it's a genuine sexuality to many people (who could be reading), not actually 'just a word'. And it does seem that understanding things often matters least to me sometimes, which is why I get so negative about things in general sometimes. pt It's your choice to react as you do. And fwiw I don't think people have an issue with needing to be attracted to someone's mind - the word Sapiosexual is somewhat pretentious and not all of us need to label our sexuality in that way. -Most of these type of terms sound like this, so what can you do? Blame the Greeks. I don't see why this has to be inherently pretentious in any way. It could only be pretentious per example in my view. Sapiosexuality involves having to go that route all the time - to the point where the mind is the only sexual attraction that some sapiosexuals have. That's *why* it has the type of name it has. It's not just a fancy way of saying you find intelligence sexy! A lot of people feel like that! There are plenty of forum and groups (even dating sites) for people with this type of sexuality of course, but they are entitled to be on Fab too without any kind of criticism hanging over them. Obviously nobody is asking anyone to use a term that doesn't properly apply to them (or even forcing anything at all). To me it just sounds like people with some similarities are needlessly worrying the term is being pushed on them, or that people are somehow lording over them - or being pretentious or whatever - but modern life seems full of such needless worries to me. To some people the term simply applies. pt" | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This site is so unwelcoming sometimes it really is. If you're not interested in a profile, why can't it be just that - a zero interest profile? It doesn't have to be a red flag or anything daft like that. How does that feel to people reading this stuff (ie the majority of people who will never want to post here). Sexuality in terms of representation has exploded in recent years. It is FAR from a binary thing, whatever the majority traits are. I think we'll reach extinction before people get to grips with it honestly I do. It's like there is no interest in understanding it. pt Don't understand your issue. No interest in understanding what? It's a word. It sounds a bit pretentious. So what? I'm partly taking up the general view here of what a lot of people generally think perhaps.. I'm just saying it's a genuine sexuality to many people (who could be reading), not actually 'just a word'. And it does seem that understanding things often matters least to me sometimes, which is why I get so negative about things in general sometimes. pt It's your choice to react as you do. And fwiw I don't think people have an issue with needing to be attracted to someone's mind - the word Sapiosexual is somewhat pretentious and not all of us need to label our sexuality in that way. -Most of these type of terms sound like this, so what can you do? Blame the Greeks. I don't see why this has to be inherently pretentious in any way. It could only be pretentious per example in my view. Sapiosexuality involves having to go that route all the time - to the point where the mind is the only sexual attraction that some sapiosexuals have. That's *why* it has the type of name it has. It's not just a fancy way of saying you find intelligence sexy! A lot of people feel like that! There are plenty of forum and groups (even dating sites) for people with this type of sexuality of course, but they are entitled to be on Fab too without any kind of criticism hanging over them. Obviously nobody is asking anyone to use a term that doesn't properly apply to them (or even forcing anything at all). To me it just sounds like people with some similarities are needlessly worrying the term is being pushed on them, or that people are somehow lording over them - or being pretentious or whatever - but modern life seems full of such needless worries to me. To some people the term simply applies. pt" What an illuminating read. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This site is so unwelcoming sometimes it really is. If you're not interested in a profile, why can't it be just that - a zero interest profile? It doesn't have to be a red flag or anything daft like that. How does that feel to people reading this stuff (ie the majority of people who will never want to post here). Sexuality in terms of representation has exploded in recent years. It is FAR from a binary thing, whatever the majority traits are. I think we'll reach extinction before people get to grips with it honestly I do. It's like there is no interest in understanding it. pt Don't understand your issue. No interest in understanding what? It's a word. It sounds a bit pretentious. So what? I'm partly taking up the general view here of what a lot of people generally think perhaps.. I'm just saying it's a genuine sexuality to many people (who could be reading), not actually 'just a word'. And it does seem that understanding things often matters least to me sometimes, which is why I get so negative about things in general sometimes. pt It's your choice to react as you do. And fwiw I don't think people have an issue with needing to be attracted to someone's mind - the word Sapiosexual is somewhat pretentious and not all of us need to label our sexuality in that way. -Most of these type of terms sound like this, so what can you do? Blame the Greeks. I don't see why this has to be inherently pretentious in any way. It could only be pretentious per example in my view. Sapiosexuality involves having to go that route all the time - to the point where the mind is the only sexual attraction that some sapiosexuals have. That's *why* it has the type of name it has. It's not just a fancy way of saying you find intelligence sexy! A lot of people feel like that! There are plenty of forum and groups (even dating sites) for people with this type of sexuality of course, but they are entitled to be on Fab too without any kind of criticism hanging over them. Obviously nobody is asking anyone to use a term that doesn't properly apply to them (or even forcing anything at all). To me it just sounds like people with some similarities are needlessly worrying the term is being pushed on them, or that people are somehow lording over them - or being pretentious or whatever - but modern life seems full of such needless worries to me. To some people the term simply applies. pt" You're making it seem more pretentious. And no, I don't think anyone on the thread is worried about the term being pushed on to them. That's a bit esoteric for Fab. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is it just a variation on fancying your teacher? "Only if it's your physics teacher. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This site is so unwelcoming sometimes it really is. If you're not interested in a profile, why can't it be just that - a zero interest profile? It doesn't have to be a red flag or anything daft like that. How does that feel to people reading this stuff (ie the majority of people who will never want to post here). Sexuality in terms of representation has exploded in recent years. It is FAR from a binary thing, whatever the majority traits are. I think we'll reach extinction before people get to grips with it honestly I do. It's like there is no interest in understanding it. pt Don't understand your issue. No interest in understanding what? It's a word. It sounds a bit pretentious. So what? I'm partly taking up the general view here of what a lot of people generally think perhaps.. I'm just saying it's a genuine sexuality to many people (who could be reading), not actually 'just a word'. And it does seem that understanding things often matters least to me sometimes, which is why I get so negative about things in general sometimes. pt It's your choice to react as you do. And fwiw I don't think people have an issue with needing to be attracted to someone's mind - the word Sapiosexual is somewhat pretentious and not all of us need to label our sexuality in that way. -Most of these type of terms sound like this, so what can you do? Blame the Greeks. I don't see why this has to be inherently pretentious in any way. It could only be pretentious per example in my view. Sapiosexuality involves having to go that route all the time - to the point where the mind is the only sexual attraction that some sapiosexuals have. That's *why* it has the type of name it has. It's not just a fancy way of saying you find intelligence sexy! A lot of people feel like that! There are plenty of forum and groups (even dating sites) for people with this type of sexuality of course, but they are entitled to be on Fab too without any kind of criticism hanging over them. Obviously nobody is asking anyone to use a term that doesn't properly apply to them (or even forcing anything at all). To me it just sounds like people with some similarities are needlessly worrying the term is being pushed on them, or that people are somehow lording over them - or being pretentious or whatever - but modern life seems full of such needless worries to me. To some people the term simply applies. pt You're making it seem more pretentious. And no, I don't think anyone on the thread is worried about the term being pushed on to them. That's a bit esoteric for Fab. " Well you used a Greek word so I assume we're having fun now. Cue more Greek words maybe. pt | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is it just a variation on fancying your teacher?
Only if it's your physics teacher."Which are the ones with the sandals? Maths? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Interesting thread, I would never use the term as I wouldnt be sure I was using it correctly, but I reckon it is me! I love clever people, but clever in ways I think are clever, mostly to do with books and the knowledge gotten from books, rather than "doing maths'clever. I can sit there doe eyed at their feet and listen to them drone on about clever things. Even if they looked like hulk in his green form I reckon I could still be interested. Brain fucker indeed. "Maybe you are? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is it just a variation on fancying your teacher?
Only if it's your physics teacher.
Which are the ones with the sandals? Maths? "Just remembered my primary maths teacher turned out to be a nonce. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is it just a variation on fancying your teacher?
Only if it's your physics teacher.
Which are the ones with the sandals? Maths?
"The Classics. pt | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is it just a variation on fancying your teacher?
Only if it's your physics teacher.
Which are the ones with the sandals? Maths? "Sandals and a ty jacket will be geography | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is it just a variation on fancying your teacher?
Only if it's your physics teacher.
Which are the ones with the sandals? Maths?
Sandals and a ty jacket will be geography "I cant get twEed | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is it just a variation on fancying your teacher?
Only if it's your physics teacher.
Which are the ones with the sandals? Maths?
Just remembered my primary maths teacher turned out to be a nonce.
"Surely you mean.. actually never mind. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is it just a variation on fancying your teacher?
Only if it's your physics teacher.
Which are the ones with the sandals? Maths?
Sandals and a ty jacket will be geography "With the leather patches? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is it just a variation on fancying your teacher?
Only if it's your physics teacher.
Which are the ones with the sandals? Maths? "I think that's Geography? Maths is the chalk dust all over their jacket? This may be purely anecdotal. I am just remembering my Physics teachers legs and when we had argument in class and she slapped me. I'd took the piss on some homework she set: Ideas for new renewable energy resources. She said if everyone thought like you we would never have made it out of the caves. I said: If we never made it out of the caves we wouldn't have this energy crisis. I guess she wasn't sapiosexual? There's no accounting for taste. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Corduroy must be History and Philosophy then. Sandals making it Ancient History and Aristotle etc. I like this thread now. "I felt my heart tug following a lecturer that was carrying a certain bag I find irresistable. I couldnt work out his subject but it must have been something earthy and meaningful. I dont even need your intellect, just your chattels | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Corduroy must be History and Philosophy then. Sandals making it Ancient History and Aristotle etc. I like this thread now.
I felt my heart tug following a lecturer that was carrying a certain bag I find irresistable. I couldnt work out his subject but it must have been something earthy and meaningful. I dont even need your intellect, just your chattels
"A woman who finds a satchel attractive? On Fab? I can can scarcely believe it! pt | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"For me it’s about stimulating me mentally without being lewd or crude. It’s about teasing each other with words and building up a scenario, tantalising and building up the anticipation of what’s to come. It’s not about intelligence, it’s about how creative you can be with words, using your imagination to build the tension until you actually meet and then put it into action. " All that is actually intelligence. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"For me it’s about stimulating me mentally without being lewd or crude. It’s about teasing each other with words and building up a scenario, tantalising and building up the anticipation of what’s to come. It’s not about intelligence, it’s about how creative you can be with words, using your imagination to build the tension until you actually meet and then put it into action. All that is actually intelligence." Or is it charisma? And people mistake themselves as lusting for intelligence as infact lusting for someone who has a way with words? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"For me it’s about stimulating me mentally without being lewd or crude. It’s about teasing each other with words and building up a scenario, tantalising and building up the anticipation of what’s to come. It’s not about intelligence, it’s about how creative you can be with words, using your imagination to build the tension until you actually meet and then put it into action. All that is actually intelligence. Or is it charisma? And people mistake themselves as lusting for intelligence as infact lusting for someone who has a way with words? " Of course it's intelligence. As are my posts. Even if no one reads the fucking things. pt | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"For me it’s about stimulating me mentally without being lewd or crude. It’s about teasing each other with words and building up a scenario, tantalising and building up the anticipation of what’s to come. It’s not about intelligence, it’s about how creative you can be with words, using your imagination to build the tension until you actually meet and then put it into action. All that is actually intelligence. Or is it charisma? And people mistake themselves as lusting for intelligence as infact lusting for someone who has a way with words?" Having a way with words surely requires intelligence? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
LvM | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"For me it’s about stimulating me mentally without being lewd or crude. It’s about teasing each other with words and building up a scenario, tantalising and building up the anticipation of what’s to come. It’s not about intelligence, it’s about how creative you can be with words, using your imagination to build the tension until you actually meet and then put it into action. All that is actually intelligence. Or is it charisma? And people mistake themselves as lusting for intelligence as infact lusting for someone who has a way with words? Of course it's intelligence. As are my posts. Even if no one reads the fucking things. pt" Swearing is a sign of intelligence too.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"For me it’s about stimulating me mentally without being lewd or crude. It’s about teasing each other with words and building up a scenario, tantalising and building up the anticipation of what’s to come. It’s not about intelligence, it’s about how creative you can be with words, using your imagination to build the tension until you actually meet and then put it into action. All that is actually intelligence. Or is it charisma? And people mistake themselves as lusting for intelligence as infact lusting for someone who has a way with words? Of course it's intelligence. As are my posts. Even if no one reads the fucking things. pt Swearing is a sign of intelligence too.
"Thank you, I think I even agree. I have days on here where I'd love to answer half the posts I see in pure invective lol. Secretly I know some words even nicecouple might frown upon  pt | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
