Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
![]() | Back to forum list |
![]() | Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest | ![]() |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Depends how you look at the dynamic of it. Ownership is not all and entirely negative. It can have it's place in a partnership. A man (or woman) reclaiming their position as the main sexual partner in their relationship. Mutually reclaiming. Not reclaiming the person as property. " I missed out a few words that would expand here and there but you get the gist of it. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's a dominant thing, he plants his seed after his seed to be the superior seed. We sow the seed, nature grows the seed and then we eat the seed." You eat your baby?? ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You eat your baby?? ![]() I mean, someone’s got to. Right? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Depends how you look at the dynamic of it. Ownership is not all and entirely negative. It can have it's place in a partnership. A man (or woman) reclaiming their position as the main sexual partner in their relationship. Mutually reclaiming. Not reclaiming the person as property. " I like this explanation and I think that's probably how it's used a lot (when people aren't poly but are enm). I once had a ditsy mare want to have reclaim sex with my partner of the time. She was just a fb. My dislike of the term definitely comes about from that incident. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There's not an ownership element with us as we are both in this together and play as a couple so it's not really the case for us that one person is "letting" or "allowing" the other one to play. For us the reclaim sex is about reconnecting with each other after playing with others and the confirmation that even though we enjoy swinging, it's an extra to what we already have as a couple. Also we often chat about everything that happened on the way home from a meet or a club night and are usually pretty horny again by the time we get home. " This ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is it reinforcing the element of ownership in relationships? ‘You’re mine‘ ‘I let you sleep with other people’ etc? By the way this is genuine- I was having this conversation and I wonder from a swinger’s perspective? As a poly person I do struggle with the wording so want to understand it more. ![]() Being Poly is less to do with sex than it is with emotional attachment, caring etc ... People are free to have sex with others in that poly family. No one owns your body or your sex and has no claim to it above other people. Those type of problems usually come about when one of the partners in not poly or the person claiming to be poly simply means they want to do what ever they want WITH who ever they want. That's not really poly as in general poly does not pick up 'incidentals' or randoms but has sex within their group , who are all known to each other ... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Also, I will say so what!? So what if it is about ownership. For some it might be, if that is their dynamic. It's what they both like and both enjoy. Both feel comfortable and themselves in using. Just because it's questionable wording and outlook makes zero difference as long as it 1. Between consenting adults 2. Legal in all variations. That's as a general so what, not directly to the OP and their question. " This is a fair point. It's absolutely between the people in the relationship to decide which term suits them and their dynamic. J | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is it reinforcing the element of ownership in relationships? ‘You’re mine‘ ‘I let you sleep with other people’ etc? By the way this is genuine- I was having this conversation and I wonder from a swinger’s perspective? As a poly person I do struggle with the wording so want to understand it more. ![]() Not every poly person has a group nor do they have a polycule or a similar set up. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's a dominant thing, he plants his seed after his seed to be the superior seed. We sow the seed, nature grows the seed and then we eat the seed." Then what happens Neil? ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Also, I will say so what!? So what if it is about ownership. For some it might be, if that is their dynamic. It's what they both like and both enjoy. Both feel comfortable and themselves in using. Just because it's questionable wording and outlook makes zero difference as long as it 1. Between consenting adults 2. Legal in all variations. That's as a general so what, not directly to the OP and their question. " At a guess, I'd say the wording could ring alarm bells with some relationships - as you say, if it's all consensual then crack on, but we know that's not the case in all relationships, even those which are ostensibly open. Putting this in a historical context in which married women were literally property not that long ago in terms of human history, and I think questioning the wording is understandable. Mrs TMN x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's a dominant thing, he plants his seed after his seed to be the superior seed. We sow the seed, nature grows the seed and then we eat the seed." The science behind this is spot on. The urge a man has to 'reclaim' is heavily led by this. I'd say though, it can be to reclaim his place as the lover, or their relationship together. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's a dominant thing, he plants his seed after his seed to be the superior seed. We sow the seed, nature grows the seed and then we eat the seed. Then what happens Neil? ![]() Someone got it! ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Reclaim is one label for it, which is common for hotwives and hothusbands dynamics. Compersion is how I see it, from a poly point of view. Celebrating that the person I love, has had a wonderful time with another person that they care about x" This is how I describe it as a person practising ENM. For me, it’s a celebration of their excitement post physical intimacy with another person they share life with. As a nosy cow, I love hearing every last detail of their experience during said celebration. It is not a focus on one of us being put back into ‘focus’ or claiming the person. Perhaps that paints my view of it as antonymous of ownership. In my opinion, this will vary largely based on the individual dynamic within the relationship as well. As a whole, in my relationships we have clear communication about a lack of ownership of individuals in terms of freedom to do what you wish with others because you own your own body rather than asking permission or being given the ability to make other connections. I reckon in hotwife/hothusband dynamics this would be more prevelent hence the label. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Also, I will say so what!? So what if it is about ownership. For some it might be, if that is their dynamic. It's what they both like and both enjoy. Both feel comfortable and themselves in using. Just because it's questionable wording and outlook makes zero difference as long as it 1. Between consenting adults 2. Legal in all variations. That's as a general so what, not directly to the OP and their question. " Exactly this ...while to others the wording might be problematic. Long as the people who are in the dynamic know what it means to them and both consent. It really doesn't matter. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There's not an ownership element with us as we are both in this together and play as a couple so it's not really the case for us that one person is "letting" or "allowing" the other one to play. For us the reclaim sex is about reconnecting with each other after playing with others and the confirmation that even though we enjoy swinging, it's an extra to what we already have as a couple. Also we often chat about everything that happened on the way home from a meet or a club night and are usually pretty horny again by the time we get home. " Perfect way to explain! ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I can't say I've ever had it so I've no idea. Think I'm missing out! Mrs " ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm poly so reclaim doesn't make sense. We have reconnection sex. Connecting with each other after we go do our own things. " Yeah this makes more sense than literally reclaiming the person. Depends on the relationship. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We sow the seed, nature grows the seed and then we eat the seed." "Cor, that looked just like a negative reality inversion". "Yes, it did a bit..." ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Also, I will say so what!? So what if it is about ownership. For some it might be, if that is their dynamic. It's what they both like and both enjoy. Both feel comfortable and themselves in using. Just because it's questionable wording and outlook makes zero difference as long as it 1. Between consenting adults 2. Legal in all variations. That's as a general so what, not directly to the OP and their question. " Is polyamerouse relationship just another name for swinging (relationship). I know swinging is a broad term in the modern day and many people who engauge in swinging activates may not call themselves as swingers. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Also, I will say so what!? So what if it is about ownership. For some it might be, if that is their dynamic. It's what they both like and both enjoy. Both feel comfortable and themselves in using. Just because it's questionable wording and outlook makes zero difference as long as it 1. Between consenting adults 2. Legal in all variations. That's as a general so what, not directly to the OP and their question. Is polyamerouse relationship just another name for swinging (relationship). I know swinging is a broad term in the modern day and many people who engauge in swinging activates may not call themselves as swingers." No, polyamory is having multiple emotional romantic relationships. Swinging is multiple sexual partners. Generally ethical non monogamy seems to be used as an umbrella for both but swinging is not necessarily non monogamous and there is romantic exclusivity in a lot of cases. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Also, I will say so what!? So what if it is about ownership. For some it might be, if that is their dynamic. It's what they both like and both enjoy. Both feel comfortable and themselves in using. Just because it's questionable wording and outlook makes zero difference as long as it 1. Between consenting adults 2. Legal in all variations. That's as a general so what, not directly to the OP and their question. Is polyamerouse relationship just another name for swinging (relationship). I know swinging is a broad term in the modern day and many people who engauge in swinging activates may not call themselves as swingers. No, polyamory is having multiple emotional romantic relationships. Swinging is multiple sexual partners. Generally ethical non monogamy seems to be used as an umbrella for both but swinging is not necessarily non monogamous and there is romantic exclusivity in a lot of cases. " I thought what you mentioned above is poligomy. Poligomy was having multiple romantic relationships, a polgymist is someone who has multiple wives or husbands. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" No, polyamory is having multiple emotional romantic relationships. Swinging is multiple sexual partners. Generally ethical non monogamy seems to be used as an umbrella for both but swinging is not necessarily non monogamous and there is romantic exclusivity in a lot of cases. I thought what you mentioned above is poligomy. Poligomy was having multiple romantic relationships, a polgymist is someone who has multiple wives or husbands. " Nope. Poligomy isn't a word I'm afraid. Polygomy is marrying multiple people. Polyamory is having multiple romantic relationships. Some people who are polyamorous may engage in polygomy but many don't. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" No, polyamory is having multiple emotional romantic relationships. Swinging is multiple sexual partners. Generally ethical non monogamy seems to be used as an umbrella for both but swinging is not necessarily non monogamous and there is romantic exclusivity in a lot of cases. I thought what you mentioned above is poligomy. Poligomy was having multiple romantic relationships, a polgymist is someone who has multiple wives or husbands. Nope. Poligomy isn't a word I'm afraid. Polygomy is marrying multiple people. Polyamory is having multiple romantic relationships. Some people who are polyamorous may engage in polygomy but many don't. " If you're going to correct someone's spelling should you check your own spelling first? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" No, polyamory is having multiple emotional romantic relationships. Swinging is multiple sexual partners. Generally ethical non monogamy seems to be used as an umbrella for both but swinging is not necessarily non monogamous and there is romantic exclusivity in a lot of cases. I thought what you mentioned above is poligomy. Poligomy was having multiple romantic relationships, a polgymist is someone who has multiple wives or husbands. Nope. Poligomy isn't a word I'm afraid. Polygomy is marrying multiple people. Polyamory is having multiple romantic relationships. Some people who are polyamorous may engage in polygomy but many don't. If you're going to correct someone's spelling should you check your own spelling first? " I didn't? Just stated the word poligomy doesn't exist as poster used it in a different setting to polygamy so I thought they thought they were different words for different things. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We class it as reclaim sex but not in an ownership kind of way. He knows I'm his and he is mine (as a couple) I am the only one who plays- hubby loves it. It is an intense love making session " That's exactly how it is with us - word for word! ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We are showing our love for each other and making our connection even stronger. No ownership - just bonding more. K" Best answer so far | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Reconnecting 121 again ... more about BELONGING together rather than one owning the other." Sounds lovely. ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don’t care how it’s classified, sex with my hubby after I’ve had sex with someone else is great ![]() Same here as per the classification, after the M has left our MFM fun, the reclaim interaction we have is simply amazing, by interaction I mean the hot sex x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top | ![]() |